A-10 Warthog Thunderbolt II scenes from Terminator Salvation (HD 720p)

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 вер 2024
  • Combat intro to Terminator Salvation plus the A-10 scenes from the movie.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 895

  • @ClubBlendi
    @ClubBlendi 10 років тому +1970

    This is why we cant retire the A-10! Otherwise, how will we fight the terminators in the future!

    • @richardched6085
      @richardched6085 7 років тому +60

      +ClubBlendi A-10 Rotary Cannons that Fire Plasma Rounds..... That would be amazing.

    • @HacksignKT
      @HacksignKT 5 років тому +5

      kek

    • @mansharker8
      @mansharker8 5 років тому +35

      The Warthog uses Depleted Uranium as its ammo...its harder than steel, and what Cameron used in her shotgun shells, when she blew Cromarties face off in TSCC. Sarah used the same ammo in a Barret 50 BMG when she shot the original T800 in Genesys. the T600s arent as heavily armored as the later T700 and T800.....so thats why they get shredded by the rounds.

    • @Autechltd
      @Autechltd 4 роки тому +29

      @@mansharker8 plasma is cool and all, but firing off shards of super compressed dead stars at the bad guys at a rate of 3600 rounds per minute sounds metal as fuck.

    • @MikoyanGurevichMiG21
      @MikoyanGurevichMiG21 4 роки тому +8

      Even the UH-1s and OH-6 choppers have survived well into the future

  • @MrGemini180
    @MrGemini180 7 років тому +1766

    I liked the fact that this takes place in the early stages of the war before Skynet released terminators with laser guns. I also like how the Resistance started out strong with access to jets and helicopters

    • @bamb0ostick
      @bamb0ostick 4 роки тому +247

      I would imagine the Resistance had to start using plasma weapons against the more armored T-800s. We already see that you needed anti-tank weapons to take down a single one.

    • @spooks196
      @spooks196 4 роки тому +111

      @@bamb0ostick yeah they took the plasma weapons from downed hk's and terminators.

    • @lt.x-02s-wyvern25
      @lt.x-02s-wyvern25 4 роки тому +104

      I like to think that even in 2029 they resistance still had them but they're numbers were low to which they were used sparringly and were placed in heavily defended resistance bases as the fights we see in T1 and T2 are resistance members launching offensives against skynet facilities or resistance cells out in skynet territory doing whatever they can by themselves without support

    • @Mr-Ad-196
      @Mr-Ad-196 4 роки тому +20

      Hrmmm yeah I do thing early part of this salvation skynet was using mass produce T600 that far weaker terminator it took so well place shoot do kill it.

    • @Saicofake
      @Saicofake 4 роки тому +72

      FocusFanatic the resistance war is a much more interesting story that the stupid genisys and dark fate.

  • @CasualMobileGamer
    @CasualMobileGamer 10 років тому +334

    John Conner: "Evasive Maneuvers now!"
    A-10 Pilot: No Shit Sherlock.

  • @ct92404
    @ct92404 7 років тому +155

    1:52 I love seeing the A-10 blow that Hunter-Killer out of the sky like it was nothing :)
    Skynet wasn't always "invincible," sometimes people did kick its ass.

    • @olotocolo
      @olotocolo 2 роки тому +13

      Skynet wasnt invincible in any of the movies. It sent terminators in time because it was loosing. Badly.

    • @nursestoyland
      @nursestoyland Рік тому +1

      @@olotocolohuh, I thought it was to prevent the resistance from existing

    • @raulalexandrubota
      @raulalexandrubota Рік тому +7

      ​@@nursestoylandwell yeah because the resistance was the reason skynet was losing badly.

  • @NightRaider001
    @NightRaider001 4 роки тому +43

    Here’s how you already know Marcus is a Terminator before the big reveal later down the movie. He literally fell off a speeding HK transport several dozen stories off the ground and hit the waters and literally bounced off without a scratch.

  • @mkhalishsidie610
    @mkhalishsidie610 7 років тому +219

    Terminator : pew pew pew
    A-10 : BBRRRRRRTTTT!!!!!

  • @dardo7893
    @dardo7893 9 років тому +191

    I really enjoyed this film ! Much more than genisys...

  • @blah979
    @blah979 9 років тому +451

    Two planes being chased by one plane would NEVER EVER fly in the same direction.

    • @NerdCraft360
      @NerdCraft360 8 років тому +52

      I was surprised when they didn't split, I mean wtf

    • @ZC.Andrew
      @ZC.Andrew 8 років тому +20

      +blah979 They were in a CANYON......!!!!

    • @T--kq3pj
      @T--kq3pj 8 років тому +83

      +blah979 what? At least one of them said "ok breaking off". Doesn't that mean to fly away from your partner? They simply din't had time, hunter was too fast.

    • @ZC.Andrew
      @ZC.Andrew 8 років тому +26

      T-1000 LOL yes, this. Haha! THey had a few seconds to react, and they were in a fuckin canyon!! They were boned as soon as the Hunter launched

    • @blah979
      @blah979 8 років тому +11

      +Captain Goomba Pulls stick back, not in canyon anymore.

  • @MikMoen
    @MikMoen 7 років тому +146

    Isn't it battlefield 101 to destroy the anti-air capability immediately? If those giant AA terminators were targeted first then the A-10s wouldn't be at such risk.

    • @danielzaba9913
      @danielzaba9913 7 років тому +40

      They probably didn´t have the supplies to take it out...the missile was to open a breach so their men could go in. and the A-10s and helicopters probably could not take it out.

    • @unicornlion8078
      @unicornlion8078 6 років тому +7

      Yeah as if this a real battle, not some fictional Hollywood battle.

    • @TheFacelessStoryMaker
      @TheFacelessStoryMaker 4 роки тому +7

      Yeah you'd think a SEAD (Suppression of Enemy Air Defenses) run would've been priority considering how valuable those A-10's likely are.

    • @HaloDude557
      @HaloDude557 4 роки тому +4

      It’s also a bit of a joke that the AIs couldn’t shoot down a missile. Humans have CRAMS which are effective enough, I couldn’t imagine AI tech in the same category.

    • @vacciniumaugustifolium1420
      @vacciniumaugustifolium1420 4 роки тому +3

      @@HaloDude557 it was like an Exocet missile, extremely close to the Ground so maybe their radar system didn't saw it until it was too late ?
      Idk

  • @Saicofake
    @Saicofake 10 років тому +125

    If the movie had just focused on the fucking resistance and warefare, I think it would not suck so bad. I mean C'MON. We are finally in the future, from where it supposedly began! Show the terminators all out battles and stuffs man!

    • @SargeRho
      @SargeRho 9 років тому +5

      Lord Zuko Remember that they messed with the timeline repeatedly, changing things all the time. This future isn't the same future that was in T1, 2 and 3.

    • @GoldenValleyPictures
      @GoldenValleyPictures 6 років тому +4

      Where are the purple lasers!!!!!!!!

    • @LS-oq3qh
      @LS-oq3qh 6 років тому +4

      I totally agree with you. If Terminator:salvation focused on the resistance like Star Wars:Rogue One, it would have been a refreshing shine of grace on the dying Terminator saga.

    • @GoldenValleyPictures
      @GoldenValleyPictures 6 років тому +2

      I know in this timeline they don't but they could at least show some technology going into that direction. I need me some purple lasers.

    • @unicornlion8078
      @unicornlion8078 6 років тому

      TonyBehindTheCamera yeah as if we have such technology. The resistance are nothing more than beggars who are unable survive.

  • @STRK3R1234567
    @STRK3R1234567 11 років тому +50

    A-10's DONT EXPLODE! They get hit, loose a quarter of their wing, half of their elevator, one engine, and all electrical power then shrug it off and go home. The A-10 warthog is the CHUCK NORRIS of all airplanes. NO ONE blows up Chuck Norris.

    • @commandplay
      @commandplay 5 років тому +3

      Maybe after getting hit with a plasma bolt they will.

    • @tlshortyshorty5810
      @tlshortyshorty5810 4 роки тому +1

      luke wilson The F-22 or the SU-57 would be the John Wick of combat aircraft. This is the Rambo or the Commando.

  • @MarkTheGreat555
    @MarkTheGreat555 7 років тому +59

    The A-10 was a good choice of plane for this movie since it was rather appropriate for the kinds of enemy they were fighting which are mostly ground based HK-tanks and T-600'.s I can't imagine them using an F-15,F-16, or F-22 because they would be overpowered in-terms of speed maneuverability against the aerial HK's machines. The AV-8B harrier would've also been an good choice against aerial HK's given their size and VTOL capabilities they both posses.

    • @ryancamara5689
      @ryancamara5689 Рік тому +6

      Acc it’s good for a different reason, they’re cheap and low tech, so easier to maintain than a f-15 or 22. Being overpowered against ur enemy when you’re basically fighting a war against the machines isn’t exactly a bad thing bug this is also a nuclear apocalypse with limited resources equipment and vehicles available to everyone so it’s not like the resistance can shop around

    • @twistedyogert
      @twistedyogert Рік тому

      I'm also surprised that obsolete aircraft weren't more common too.
      Were P-51 mustangs duking it out with the HK air units?
      Wouldn't piston driven fighters be easier to maintain than jets?

    • @ryancamara5689
      @ryancamara5689 Рік тому +3

      @@twistedyogert see there a small problem with that tho, if slow moving jets are being shot down with ease what do u think is gonna happen to a p-51?
      It’s also a matter of where are they gonna find all the equipment to manage a fleet of ww2 era aircraft, at least jets have former military bases to scavenge from

    • @TheNappalorian
      @TheNappalorian Рік тому

      Supposedly they also had Apaches fighting the Aerials when the war first started

    • @VenusLancer
      @VenusLancer Рік тому

      @@ryancamara5689 dude the P-51 have literally the same max speed of a A-10 (380-385 knots)

  • @silverdart333
    @silverdart333 4 роки тому +32

    The last true Terminator movie....

  • @GamezforNoobz
    @GamezforNoobz 8 років тому +13

    "Vanguard this is Blackjack-Six. Missile inbound to skynet target, TTO One-One seconds."

    • @GamezforNoobz
      @GamezforNoobz 8 років тому +2

      "Danger close."

    • @mjcandy9153
      @mjcandy9153 5 років тому +3

      2 problems: TTO is Time to Objective, which is used on personell not ordinance. He should've used TOT which means Time on Target.
      And "Danger Close" is used when deploying ordinance when friendlies will be within 100m of the impact zone? Nobody was that close. The SOF team was still on helos at least 1/2 a mile out and the planes are moving to daat to get caught in the frag pattern of their own ordinance.

  • @WhatAreColors
    @WhatAreColors 7 років тому +5

    God I love the second scene. The A10 Planes are probably super valuable for the resistance, hard to maintain, hard to even take for a test flight without alarming HKs. They also have barely any chance, they really are like flying empty cans compared to the machines. Still two of them go for it, and they actually kill the first HK like fucking gangsters. The huge machine gun fucks up the walker pretty much beyond repair and after that their first pass is over and they obviously never get a second one.

  • @Verkili
    @Verkili 10 років тому +86

    I'm looking at the subtitles and all I can think to myself is...
    "Man, is the Russian word for 'eject' really 3 times as long as English?"

    • @hellcatdave1
      @hellcatdave1 10 років тому

      vybrasyvat

    • @JekaZMD
      @JekaZMD 9 років тому +1

      katapul'tiruysya

    • @JekaZMD
      @JekaZMD 9 років тому +1

      ***** there is no, it will just be the same word only spelled in chirilic.

    • @hellcatdave1
      @hellcatdave1 9 років тому

      JekaZMD Cyrillic....

    • @JekaZMD
      @JekaZMD 9 років тому +4

      hellcatdave1
      ok, cool. The way I wrote it is also correct, only in another language.

  • @falcon-ng6sd
    @falcon-ng6sd 3 роки тому +3

    Skynet: "We have armored tiltjet aircraft - you're toast, humans!"
    Human Resistance: BRRRRRRT!

  • @Ben82077
    @Ben82077 4 роки тому +7

    Terminator 2 movie, 50,000 rounds expended at the T-1000
    Terminator Salvation: Conners puts two rounds into a semi crushed T 600’s head...it’s dead. The future’s easy.

    • @TheFacelessStoryMaker
      @TheFacelessStoryMaker 4 роки тому +1

      Well the T-600's were weaker plus it was in the impact zone of the cruise missile AND was blasted with the 30mm cannon on the A-10. So a burst of what I assume 7.62mm rounds would finish it.

    • @venpirethevampire
      @venpirethevampire 4 роки тому

      @@TheFacelessStoryMaker Yeah A-10 uses 30mm Vulcan Cannon that fires Depleted Uranium Rounds. It is actually impressive since if Skynet's armor was normal that harvester would be ripped into half

  • @harambespirit3065
    @harambespirit3065 9 років тому +25

    Is it just me or I heard a BBRRRTTTT at 0:26

  • @adrianlindsaylohan
    @adrianlindsaylohan 14 років тому +1

    this film truly diserves a Oscar for special effects, or cinematogrophy, or art direction. and a lenghthy DVD special edition

  • @Zero2267
    @Zero2267 13 років тому +5

    I love how this movie actually showcases Human Military hardware as being able to destroy Terminators and Hunter Killer vehicles. The U.S Military is the most powerful military force in the history of mankind, a nuclear war shouldn't get rid of all that military technology we have. If we get scenes like this but on a full-scale war like scene as in the intro of Terminator 2 then that would be an awesome movie.

  • @awesom6588
    @awesom6588 3 місяці тому

    The A10 actually was depicted pretty well in this movie, takes 50% losses on a gun run, gets immediately slaughtered when enemy aircraft engage it

  • @wommytiseau3974
    @wommytiseau3974 6 років тому +2

    Seriously? THIS is the movie where the sound designer was actually correct with the A-10? The movie itself is so completely meh, and the sound designer told McG:
    “Yeah, the movie is about as mediocre as it gets, but can we at least not fuck something up for once in production?”
    So so weird.

  • @darkjediMIK
    @darkjediMIK 5 років тому +2

    That first scene with all the Hueys needed more Flight of the Valkyries

  • @JamaicanMan18
    @JamaicanMan18 13 років тому

    @ourtimelost plus you gotta remember that judgement day left several billion people alive, there wasnt a nuke on every small town and whatnot, so outside of the major skynet areas, theres likely alot of small towns and maybe a few small cities left that could have left considerable resources left.

  • @MerchantIvoryfilms
    @MerchantIvoryfilms 13 років тому

    The first 5 min of this movie is what the last 1 hour and 55 min should have been like.

  • @grant21999
    @grant21999 8 років тому +5

    My fav scene in the movie

  • @doggonemess1
    @doggonemess1 13 років тому +1

    @Drakki100 It was designed specifically to destroy Soviet tanks. The entire aircraft was built around the 30mm cannon in the nose. Of course, being designed to attack tanks means that the aircraft was also ideal for numerous ground attack missions. I don't think there is a record of an A-10 engaging in a dogfight, but I could be wrong. Against an enemy with similar turning capabilities, I don't see why they couldn't perform air combat.

  • @chancellorpalpatineakathes6130
    @chancellorpalpatineakathes6130 5 років тому +1

    Correct me if I’m wrong but the use of The A-10 and other Cold War era vehicles like that helicopter was primarily because those were the only older hardware that didn’t get jacked and fried?

  • @RACKEMDADDY
    @RACKEMDADDY 7 років тому +3

    That M.O.A.B bomb tho!

    • @richardched6085
      @richardched6085 7 років тому +3

      RACKEMDADDY it was a bunker buster not an MOAB. Judgement Day happened in 1997/2004 they didn't have MOABs yet.

  • @callofdutyguy9
    @callofdutyguy9 13 років тому +1

    I think the whole movie should have been a a war movie with large scale battles

  • @1airplane21
    @1airplane21 12 років тому

    well the tank of most modern jet fighters have nitrogen pumped into the tanks as the fuel is used up to prevent fires. Also I might be wrong but im pretty sure the has self fueling fuel tanks( or it would be a good ground attack aircraft) so when it was hit the fuel can usually still seal it self to prevent leaks. Jet fuel has a high flash point so risk of fire is lower. So fires are not really that likely

  • @wizzzer1337
    @wizzzer1337 14 років тому

    actually, while A-10s are easy to maintain F-16s are also a good rugged choice. there is a reason so many different countries use it and its the only jet that can be used in Alaska. and since there are thousands of them in the US airbases inventory it would make sense the ressitance would use F-16s as well.

  • @mangler117
    @mangler117 12 років тому

    A-10's are built to survive having one of its engine's blown off and up to a third of one of its wings blown off. The pilot is encased in the "titanium bathtub", even the glass is built to resist 20 mm cannon fire.

  • @SuperIllusiveman
    @SuperIllusiveman 13 років тому

    1:57 If I remember correctly, the rounds from the main gun of a A-10 hits with the same kinetic force as a round from the main gun of an Abrams battle tank. Why was that robot still in one piece?

    • @0bsidianPrime
      @0bsidianPrime 4 роки тому

      All has gone to shit man. The humans were lucky to find whatever base(s) that contained undamaged A-10s, they probably already used all the DU rounds up, and only had the ability to make basic 30 mm rounds.

  • @wizzzer1337
    @wizzzer1337 15 років тому

    Wow, this is so much better than the Transformers A10 scene.... here you understand where the A10s are shooting at, IT SOUNDS LIKE A GAU-8, it looks fast and it feels just right.

  • @Ultra_Sauce
    @Ultra_Sauce 4 роки тому +3

    That ship not getting shredded from 2 A-10’s ripping into it is some serious bullshit

  • @lmos26
    @lmos26 12 років тому

    I was never a hardcore simmer, I dabbled in F.4.0 back in the 90's but i didnt have the passion for the aircraft. However my passion for the A-10 was plenty enough motivation to push me to learn.UA-cam has GREAT tutorials out their and anyone else that shares this passion wouldnt waste a moment in mastering the game. Save NAV for last and focus on startup procedures then basic gun runs, then goto using your MFCDs and TGPDS > Mavs and so on. Its DAMN close to the real thing. almost mil qual

  • @brumpotungus464
    @brumpotungus464 6 років тому

    So John has that little screen he’s using to watch the whole fight between the planes and terminators, and it’s actively tracking all moving objects from a birds eye view, so I’m gonna assume that the resistance has some sort of satellite array, or at least 1 or 2 satellites orbiting around earth? And if so, how has skynet not taken them out, considering the fact that skynet actually does have orbiting satellites?

  • @ChadTheCreator
    @ChadTheCreator 14 років тому

    I love how, even though Humanity was vastly blown during Judgement Day, the Humans can still kick a little ass. The carpet bombing was epic.

  • @maestro-zq8gu
    @maestro-zq8gu 6 років тому +2

    A-10's weren't meant for air combat.

  • @matthew_natividad
    @matthew_natividad 9 років тому +19

    R warthogs the only aircraft they had in the war against the machines?

    • @geonerd
      @geonerd 8 років тому +10

      +matthew natividad They are the only ones left. (Darwinian selection at its finest!)

    • @ZC.Andrew
      @ZC.Andrew 8 років тому +21

      +matthew natividad They are probably the only ones hardy enough to still survive without a massive overhead, and also have the most resistance to EMP attacks and such.

    • @matthew_natividad
      @matthew_natividad 8 років тому

      Captain Goomba really?

    • @ZC.Andrew
      @ZC.Andrew 8 років тому +12

      matthew natividad Oh who knows, makes the most sense to me. Modern fighters need a LOT of babysitting, would be more vulnerable to Skynet themselves, and are fragile as Hell. This sort of war needs Warthogs. Yeah. Who knows. I am talking out of my ass, but sounds legit.

    • @richardched6085
      @richardched6085 7 років тому +15

      matthew natividad modern fighters are networked. A-10s are not. Plus this was all the Resistance had aside from a few Apache Helicopters. The majority of Connor's unit was a gurrilla force.

  • @FedoReds88
    @FedoReds88 4 роки тому

    A movie wrongly underrated.

  • @TRheraklesTR
    @TRheraklesTR 4 роки тому +1

    *if you came for only BRRRT: **1:56*

  • @WilliamAftonstudios
    @WilliamAftonstudios 4 роки тому

    SKYNET: WHY DO I HEAR BOSS MUSIC???!!!
    A-10: BRRRRRRRTTT METAL MOTHERFUCKERS!!!!

  • @stealthy1498
    @stealthy1498 3 роки тому

    No wonder that last pilot went down. She had to be told how to live her own life step by step.

  • @mikeclark2224
    @mikeclark2224 9 років тому +17

    they're being chased by one enemy, why didnt they pull a "Hey i go left, you go right"? You know how to use one of the most complicated machines in the world that only a few hundred people know how to use, and your not smart enough to win a 2 Vs 1??

    • @geonerd
      @geonerd 8 років тому +1

      +Mike Clark Because Hollywood is da stoopid...

    • @jagerlionruiz8639
      @jagerlionruiz8639 7 років тому +1

      It's an advanced AI, there's a reason why humans don't have air superiority in these movies.

    • @GigaPlaya
      @GigaPlaya 6 років тому

      The terminator plane can stop in mid-air, turn and hover. The A10 can't.

  • @seni577
    @seni577 13 років тому

    The first scene is the best film! Finally, for me

  • @TheReaperODST
    @TheReaperODST 11 років тому

    to be fair theres going to be some areas that werent hit by the nukes on judgment day, so some military vehicles and aircraft would be in working order, though im douting that theyd have the fuel or ammo to keep them runing for long

  • @survivor686
    @survivor686 9 років тому +8

    Now...lets see the f-35 pull this off

    • @A-G-F-
      @A-G-F- 9 років тому +15

      A-10 fits better against robots

    • @RajarajanPanneerselvam
      @RajarajanPanneerselvam 9 років тому +10

      +survivor686 Skynet would already fried the electronics of F35

    • @matthew_natividad
      @matthew_natividad 7 років тому +1

      But wood f35s b available before judgement day?

    • @dongchankim2417
      @dongchankim2417 6 років тому

      mathew navidad, Good point!

    • @hujack3747
      @hujack3747 5 років тому

      tkoshy F-35 would hack sky net and shut down the server, that’s how the resistance win the war

  • @utley
    @utley 4 роки тому

    The first scene wasnt hud tape from the A-10, was from a cruise missile.

  • @Prongsie93
    @Prongsie93 13 років тому

    @smka13 Skynet most likely still requires fuel for various things. It's believable that the Resistance has made some raids to acquire the liquid money.

  • @zaikoji
    @zaikoji 10 років тому +4

    a movie with great action set pieces.
    but the supposedly calculating and merciless machine still can't resist monologuing at the end, and consequently loses.
    when will bosses, both human and computer, learn to go for the quick kill..

    • @SargeRho
      @SargeRho 9 років тому

      zaikoji Not any time soon.

  • @CaptainRichardReiben
    @CaptainRichardReiben 14 років тому

    @SpartanAceMe2 That may be true about the F-22 but the Resistance could have easily fixed those problems with their best mechanics to make it operable. The F-18 is good but it's an outdated plane. The 1 advantage of the F-22 is it's stealth capabilities.

  • @kevintang2605
    @kevintang2605 4 роки тому

    The cameraman survives all of this

  • @CaptainRichardReiben
    @CaptainRichardReiben 14 років тому

    @lostMachinima Most likely a Cruise missile though it looks different with that camera in the nose. Must have been a modified weapon created by the Resistance.

  • @ProjectSun91
    @ProjectSun91 13 років тому

    1:57 It looks like most of those 30mm rounds from that first burst of that GAU-8 have missed for some reason since I only see a few detonations of those rounds hitting that Harvester.

  • @ghostreaper2978
    @ghostreaper2978 4 роки тому

    0:25 Mobius One coming in clutch.

  • @SCARRIOR
    @SCARRIOR 4 роки тому

    This movie was the best

  • @big131
    @big131 4 роки тому +1

    I’ll take this reboot over what we got now. This movie is fantastic compared to the new ones.

  • @nvsnake1489
    @nvsnake1489 3 роки тому

    If the resistance had surface to surface missiles, it would've made more sense to use them on the air defense so the Warthogs could engage their targets without getting lasered down.

  • @Dacrowzam2007
    @Dacrowzam2007 3 роки тому +1

    Isnt the A10 for Close Air support?

  • @tlshortyshorty5810
    @tlshortyshorty5810 4 роки тому

    Should have brought some dedicated fighters like F-16s as escorts for the A-10s.

  • @ObzTicle
    @ObzTicle 3 роки тому

    Calmest pilots ever.

  • @zaccrowe4317
    @zaccrowe4317 4 роки тому +1

    :30 Sir, isn’t this danger close for the task force?
    Since when does Connor care about danger close.

  • @rubberbandman200
    @rubberbandman200 13 років тому

    @doggonemess1 there isnt a dogfight ever recorded cuz none never hapend, this plane wasnt built to dogfight but im sure it can, but it wouldnt be the best at it...im sure the a10 doesnt have a lead computing gun sight any way

  • @AkiyamaKatsuko
    @AkiyamaKatsuko 4 роки тому +1

    2:33 How many Gs did they pull there?

  • @andrew9371
    @andrew9371 5 років тому

    The A-10 Thunderbolt survived congress! there is no way a mere machine empire can defeat it!

  • @СумеречныйАнгел-э5е
    @СумеречныйАнгел-э5е 11 років тому

    when i watch this scene on the cinema my mind thought that this could be a great movie...then...i sleep like a baby with my popcorn on the floor..

  • @Truck_person
    @Truck_person 5 років тому

    A-10s dont go down that easily

  • @danielbeita9277
    @danielbeita9277 4 роки тому

    Camouflage are awesome!

  • @habbennagen
    @habbennagen 8 років тому

    Favorite scenes

  • @YoungBrada
    @YoungBrada 13 років тому

    Cool video nice job love A-10's

  • @peytonmiller1456
    @peytonmiller1456 12 років тому

    ok did she call the other pilot wild eagle or wild weasel?
    computer dosent have good audio at the moment.

  • @MrZebros
    @MrZebros 4 роки тому

    Gau-8 my favorite hand gun to gunfight :)

  • @kimskis
    @kimskis 13 років тому +1

    A-10's are cool and tough vehicles, but are they really THAT agile in Air-to-Air combat and are they even designed to fight enemy aircraft?

    • @0bsidianPrime
      @0bsidianPrime 4 роки тому

      They can be equiped with air-to-air missiles, and some well placed BRRRRTs can ruin an aircraft's life, so I think it comes down to inginuity.
      The agility *does* seem a bit far fetched, but then again I have never seen an A-10 have to evasive manuvears irl. 🧐

  • @06196012
    @06196012 14 років тому

    but it still does a good job of providing CAS support to troops on the frontline.
    I personally know soldiers who have had the support of the a10 when they are fighting on the field.
    Besides the a10 has one advantage that few aircraft have and that is that they can operate from rought airfields and heavily damaged one s and that is why the resistance chose to use this in their army

  • @4thdimensionai972
    @4thdimensionai972 4 роки тому

    I just hope they had factory for weapon despite that they can't replace it and its valuable

  • @SynarG
    @SynarG 7 місяців тому +1

    Why are those 30 mm rounds doing so little dmg?

  • @glennfield
    @glennfield 4 роки тому

    damn this movie was cool

  • @marcleslac2413
    @marcleslac2413 4 роки тому

    Laser guns no, I want my fucking missiles and 30mm gatling gun that goes BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRT

  • @Shinransa
    @Shinransa 3 роки тому

    If they make a new movie just don't try to do the time travel thing again and just do the war in the future because it's so much more interesting and at least you can't royally fuck it up.
    Also, if I was in a resistance against killing machines I'd want A-10s

  • @omegaerwin5417
    @omegaerwin5417 4 роки тому

    Just realizing that a ground assault might have been a better way to go if the air defenses were that strong and humanity was low on resources

  • @pompuslompus964
    @pompuslompus964 4 роки тому

    I didn’t realize the terminator crafts were that fast

  • @markrobertson6664
    @markrobertson6664 4 роки тому

    Impressive. Very nice. Let’s see Paul Allen’s attack aircraft.

  • @суборбитально-летящий-эчпочмак

    Приятно, что звуки залпов такие же, как в реальности. А то в тех же трансформерах будто какой-то м249 стрекочет, но никак не тридцатимиллиметровая семистволка

  • @ShiftyDrums
    @ShiftyDrums 8 років тому

    such a BRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRReeeze to the feeling :

  • @florinivan6907
    @florinivan6907 2 роки тому

    You'd think Skynet a supercomputer would invest more into jamming and or 'spoofing' human electronics. The robots would be so much better at this than us. Just as WW2 was an intel war first and foremost same here. Of course an entire movie about humans trying to encrypt messages against machines that are by default better at this than us wouldn't be very cinematic.

  • @nuttex
    @nuttex 13 років тому

    @MarkTheRide More interesting question is how that A-10 at 0:32 appeared literally out of nowhere.

    • @0bsidianPrime
      @0bsidianPrime 4 роки тому

      It was coming out of the general angle of the sun, most things generally just appear when close to the sun.

  • @lloyd9710
    @lloyd9710 4 роки тому

    connor is on the ground like they would say that on a combat radio net

  • @nuttex
    @nuttex 14 років тому

    BTW, that's the video with Russian subtitles.

  • @borgship3357
    @borgship3357 8 років тому

    thank you

  • @pratik1568
    @pratik1568 5 років тому

    In the timeline of this movie the a10 must be atleast a 100 years old

    • @NyuuMikuru1
      @NyuuMikuru1 4 роки тому

      Big Chungus Yeah well, it is a nuclear waste and getting parts are rare.

  • @dickiewongtk
    @dickiewongtk 4 роки тому

    I like the design of the aerial hunter killer more.

  • @Af40sg
    @Af40sg 14 років тому

    @smka13 air to air above 20000 ft no its like shootin fish in a barrel but put them on the low altitude around 1500 around cayons or mountains easy guns

  • @h3lldiv3r
    @h3lldiv3r 11 років тому

    i would actually expect that two a10 are powerful enough to bring down the prison plane ...

  • @millsyinnz
    @millsyinnz 4 роки тому

    I couldn't get how the resistance had the infrastructure to maintain a fleet of A10's.

  • @username88094
    @username88094 3 роки тому

    2:14 well no fucking wonder the second pilot died, he went the same way as the first pilot when he said breaking off!

  • @kmahoney63
    @kmahoney63 12 років тому

    Cover Your Ass. It means making sure you can blame someone else if shit goes south.

  • @impactodelsurenterprise2440
    @impactodelsurenterprise2440 4 роки тому +1

    So the A-10 has air to air capability?

    • @0bsidianPrime
      @0bsidianPrime 4 роки тому

      A bit, with some Air-to-Air missiles, well placed shots, and creativity, A-10 is pretty damn decent.