Battle of Algiers (1966)excuses for justifying torture

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 лип 2015
  • Algerian war of independence,rationalization of the torture,Colonialism,Imperialism
    I do not own, nor do I or intend to profit from this content whatsoever. "Copyright Disclaimer Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, allowance is made for "fair use" for purposes such as criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing. Non-profit, educational or personal use tips the balance in favor of fair use."
    All right reserved to:Director: Gillo Pontecorvo

КОМЕНТАРІ • 106

  • @atulyadora-laskey7056
    @atulyadora-laskey7056 3 роки тому +161

    The French actor who played the Colonel, Jean Martin, was the only truly "professional" actor in movie. Before the movie, Martin was blacklisted in France for signing a manifesto against the Algerian war. Brave man who put on a great perfomance.

    • @moira932
      @moira932 3 роки тому +20

      He was also a para himself in indochine

  • @garrison6863
    @garrison6863 5 років тому +81

    Excellent film in every way. Intelligent, fair, well directed and edited. Jean Martin as the colonel is simply first class.

    • @reyking3006
      @reyking3006 4 роки тому +19

      i'am algerian and i agree, the best movies are the ones that are not biased, this movie simply told the truth, no side was perfect in this battel

    • @inferno0020
      @inferno0020 3 роки тому +4

      no macho bullshit, no sugarcoat of reality on both sides.

  • @jordanwilliams8235
    @jordanwilliams8235 3 роки тому +48

    This scene is written so freaking well. Really intelligent dialogue

  • @PhilippeRR1
    @PhilippeRR1 5 років тому +65

    The Colonel's last sentence says it all. "Should FRANCE stay in ALGERIA?" If the answer had been yes, we would've had to accept the consequences --which were unacceptable. Many a French soldier went mad because of these "consequences" (some officers, like Massu, actually ended up adopting Arab orphans of war to redeem themselves). DE GAULLE could not accept these consequences either. That, among other reasons, is why he went for auto-determination on September 16th 1959. Of course, had FRANCE followed a One Class of Citizen Rule policy from the very beginning, the Algerian War of Independence would've never occurred. DE GAULLE's June 4th 1958 speech came 13 years too late.

    • @andreinarangel6227
      @andreinarangel6227 5 років тому +24

      De Gaulle never wanted to embrace the "once class of citizen rule" for the simple reason, and I'm paraphrasing him, if the savages were allowed to become French citizens en masse, his home town of Colombey-les-Deux-Églises would've become in 20 years "Colombey-les-Deux-Mosques".

    • @markhenley3097
      @markhenley3097 4 роки тому +4

      @@andreinarangel6227 Yes he simply wanted France and the French people to leave Algeria. That's why he also didn't try to make the Algerian government give the French people any rights or protect them during the Oran Massacre.

    • @MrJuvefrank
      @MrJuvefrank 4 роки тому

      @@markhenley3097 De Gaulle sounds pretty non chalant.

    • @paullisanti8673
      @paullisanti8673 3 роки тому

      Very Dignified Response. BTW, my mother was born in Rouen, and her last name was Poitrenaud. Almost like yours-

    • @Fifi-jb3yx
      @Fifi-jb3yx Рік тому +3

      Oh no poor baby french soldiers crying because they raped and tortured people :(

  • @nicholasroyer9066
    @nicholasroyer9066 3 роки тому +24

    That last 30 seconds says it all. for just about every war and conflict and misunderstanding: "do you want what you're fighting for? If so, then accept the consequences, and carry on.

    • @atulyadora-laskey7056
      @atulyadora-laskey7056 3 роки тому +25

      You're right, but I think the point of that line in context of the movie was that it was always going to be impossible to do a "nice" version of colonialism/imperialism. It's an act that is inherently violent and always leads to more violence.

    • @woodworkerroyer8497
      @woodworkerroyer8497 3 роки тому +3

      @@atulyadora-laskey7056 True. I don't know if it is 100% impossible for imperialism to be peaceful though. I could see a large, rich country taking a developing nation under its wing and helping it (giving trade, etc), but I have never heard of such a thing happening. (But, I'm no expert, so maybe I just haven't heard about one.)

    • @atulyadora-laskey7056
      @atulyadora-laskey7056 3 роки тому +11

      @@woodworkerroyer8497 I agree. In theory yes, but in practice it always leads to a exploitative and violent situation.

    • @kingmacbeth9704
      @kingmacbeth9704 3 роки тому +3

      All trade in all forms generally lead to exploitive situation. Humanity overall practically spirals down to exploitation. If you sell a product to someone while knowing he could walk a block down to buy a good for a lower price is also exploitation.
      At the end, no matter what relationship will be between countries, all long term trade will inevitably most likely end in exploitation be from an NGO or a state owned prop

    • @chrisc5275
      @chrisc5275 Рік тому +1

      Mealy mouthed politicians are never prepared to accept the consequences. They leave that to soldiers.

  • @AjaxOileo
    @AjaxOileo 5 років тому +27

    The Algerian war of independency in a nutshell.

  • @aubonstudios4558
    @aubonstudios4558 2 місяці тому +2

    I know comment sections are always filled with praise of movies they show but this is probably my single favorite scene of any movie ever.
    It gets to the heart of fighting political battles: what do you believe most of all? And if you know you believe it, you must know that everything else you pretend to care about is second order.
    In this case, the general was clear in the way the journalists were not. He knew exactly what he wanted, to force the people of Algeria to live under French rule.
    I never sided with the French in this movie. I find it impossible too. But the general knew exactly what he was doing and why.

    • @HoussamNekkaa
      @HoussamNekkaa Місяць тому

      Do you respect nazis too ?

    • @aubonstudios4558
      @aubonstudios4558 Місяць тому

      @@HoussamNekkaa Ok that is absolutely touche. Respect was way too strong of a word. I'll edit.

  • @WhocaresWhy44
    @WhocaresWhy44 8 місяців тому +3

    Lizard Cammies and Persol Sunglasses. Military Haut Couture. Colonel Mattieu walks at the head of the column. It is implied "If you wish to offend France then offend me. France and I are the same."

  • @kingmacbeth9704
    @kingmacbeth9704 3 роки тому +17

    Israel and Palestine summed up

    • @eaglesfan226
      @eaglesfan226 Рік тому +4

      🇺🇸 🇮🇱
      Two countries, similar system
      🇺🇸 🫂 🇵🇸 #PalestinianLivesMatter

  • @RassBrass
    @RassBrass 4 роки тому +17

    It’s Ironic that he’s talking about their fight against Nazism.

    • @RassBrass
      @RassBrass 4 роки тому +16

      Alien Alien I feel a little insulted. I have family members who died fighting the French imperial army. My father faught against the French colony. My maternal grand father fought the Nazis in Corsica in 1943 and in Italy In 43/44, with the third Algerian ( French ) infantry division. Before he returned to Algeria and was among the first to start the liberation war against the French colony, his house was burned to the ground in 1956 and was jailed for 3 years.

    • @RassBrass
      @RassBrass 4 роки тому

      Then you’re watching the wrong videos. You should be on TikTok

    • @Smogshaik
      @Smogshaik 4 роки тому +3

      @Alien Alien Oh but it is ironic. He's using the fact that he fought against the Nazis as a justification. To me it shows how messy war ist and how really nothing stops countries from becoming oppressive forces. An oppressive force is even likely to turn its opposition into one as well.

    • @markhenley3097
      @markhenley3097 4 роки тому +3

      @@RassBrass So he died fighting Napoleon? That's the only time France had an Imperial Army.

    • @RassBrass
      @RassBrass 4 роки тому +6

      Prins van Oranje France second colonial empire began with the conquest of Algiers in 1830.

  • @DrGrove
    @DrGrove 8 місяців тому +9

    Legit, the same thing is happening in Palestine today.

    • @girlishgamer1
      @girlishgamer1 4 місяці тому +4

      Exactly, this movie explains why things like Hamas exist in the first place, because of the oppression over their lives.

  • @smokyondagrass2353
    @smokyondagrass2353 7 років тому +34

    best scene of that whole movie.
    that question "should France stay in Algeria, of yes then you must accept the consequences"
    that question could be used in many foreign policy decisions to this day.
    "should south Vietnam be a non-communist country"
    should the u.s prop up a democratic regime
    should they U.N. promote democracy and human rights
    etc.
    though this movie did heavily simplify the war to the point the movie lost the lessons that we should learn of that conflict.

    • @ravishingravi
      @ravishingravi 5 років тому +3

      smokyondagrass What lessons were to be learnt ?

    • @garcalej
      @garcalej 4 роки тому +9

      @@ravishingravi
      1. You cannot win ANY war if there is no political will on the home-front to bear the costs of "winning", no matter how effective or brutal the tactics employed. Before committing to a policy of militarized action, any responsible government must first question the rational for said action. Is the cause itself a just one? Is the mandate they are trying to impose based on reality or just wishful thinking?;
      2. Violent tactics against civilians by either side very often have the opposite intended effects; it stiffens the resolve of the enemy to fight, leads to escalating acts of retaliation, and reduces the amount of sympathy outside parties have for the combatants (Note how the French truly start to lose war when they begin gunning down civilians, while the FLN gains more credibility abroad through acts of civil disobedience than they do through terror);
      3. Native inhabitants fighting against an occupier tend to have an advantage in moral and knowledge of the terrain that can mitigate or entirely negate the advantages said occupier has in materiel, training, and weapons, more so when that warfare is asymmetric warfare; and
      4. The most important battles are often waged far away from the actual battlefields, in the minds and imaginations of those people, politicians, artists, and policy-makers, whose opinions and decision making will ultimately decide the outcome of the conflict. However you choose to do it, you must CONTROL THE NARRATIVE

    • @RoyalKnightVIII
      @RoyalKnightVIII 4 роки тому +2

      "democratic"? A regime yes but democratic? Diem was many things and a Democrat was not one of them.

    • @smokyondagrass2353
      @smokyondagrass2353 4 роки тому +1

      @@RoyalKnightVIII I meant democratic regimes in a general term, but I should have put democratic in quotations

    • @smokyondagrass2353
      @smokyondagrass2353 3 роки тому +1

      @@BurntPlaydoh fair point, the first casualty of war is truth.

  • @Alain-Delon
    @Alain-Delon Місяць тому

    Respect to Tobey Maguire. Our grand brother.

  • @chicagorhtours
    @chicagorhtours Рік тому +2

    Beautiful - outstanding. This film was banned in France for supposedly taking the Algerian FLN terrorist side - but... I think this French Colonel Massu counter terrorist man has the best lines. Hell yes, fight terror with counter terror.

    • @343-3
      @343-3 9 місяців тому +2

      i wonder who started the terror? is it the algerians who invaded france or the other way around?, focus when sharing your ideas and opinions with others, it is often how fools are exposed "when they open their mouths".

    • @Isupremacy
      @Isupremacy 7 місяців тому

      Are you saying the terrorists are the ones who decided to fight for their country and freedom and free their people from mass genocide and inhumane treatment and the rape of women from french soldiers?

    • @mohamedalahmadani5174
      @mohamedalahmadani5174 Місяць тому

      Maybe I misunderstood, but are you calling the Algerians ter*or*sts for fighting for their country against the French foreign invaders?

  • @inferno0020
    @inferno0020 4 роки тому +13

    I think many rightwinger simply misinterpret what Colonel Matthieu said. He didn't say he enjoy tortures. Colonel Matthieu said it clearly: when the FLN wants to throw us out and we want to stay.
    It is not like Rightwingers that don't bother to have any clear objective and treat tortures like a state-run horror show.

    • @eaglesfan226
      @eaglesfan226 10 місяців тому +2

      Whatever. What soldiers call their job when they know perfectly well torture is against the Geneva convention, I call hypocrisy.

  • @inferno0020
    @inferno0020 4 роки тому +22

    He is no-bullshit and well-articulated. Even if you disagree with him, he has a point.

    • @mateloman
      @mateloman 2 роки тому

      What point ? Torture?? Asshol !!!!!!

    • @brucesnow7125
      @brucesnow7125 Рік тому +7

      oh UA-cam commenters and their love of fascists

    • @ravishingravi
      @ravishingravi Рік тому +3

      ​@@brucesnow7125oh UA-cam commentator and their penchant for knee jerk ad hominem.

    • @psychopates
      @psychopates 7 місяців тому

      @@brucesnow7125Your mom is gay

  • @imammasri_1858
    @imammasri_1858 7 років тому +20

    Cette film est banni en France. Je suis un Arabe-Muslim et je dis encore, "Vivre Algeria!!"

  • @chrisconnell8464
    @chrisconnell8464 Рік тому

    Bill O Reilley and other talking heads copied this exact speech with "Do you want to win the war on terror....yes or no?"

  • @ravenrose5712
    @ravenrose5712 2 роки тому

    Why did they stay in Algeria?

    • @redarkhon482
      @redarkhon482 3 місяці тому +2

      Ressources and investment, especailly in early 20th century when oil was being discovered.
      They didn't want to just remain in Algeria, they wanted Algeria without the Algerians.

  • @florinivan6907
    @florinivan6907 2 роки тому +5

    'those who call us fascists' there's more than one type of fascist. And there ain't no rule stating 'fascists' can't kill each other l.

    • @user-li8wj3lt2l
      @user-li8wj3lt2l 2 роки тому +1

      I like how term "fascism" has been bastardized to describe any politically incorrect group. Anything that's bad just goes into this bag now))

    • @eaglesfan226
      @eaglesfan226 10 місяців тому +2

      I’m sick of those bastards using the Holocaust to get away with the war crimes. This does not make them any better than the Nazis we fought in the war.

  • @tiivc
    @tiivc 3 роки тому +17

    Thank God French imperialism has been kicked out of Algeria so there's no torture there anymore!

  • @eaglesfan226
    @eaglesfan226 4 роки тому +8

    That’s like my Dad taking sides when all I wanted was to end the Arab Israeli war peacefully.

    • @MrJuvefrank
      @MrJuvefrank 4 роки тому

      That blue and yellow object on the left side of your name looks like a kitty-cat.

  • @chalmers3485
    @chalmers3485 6 років тому +10

    If only men like these would take charge

    • @seanmcmanus2777
      @seanmcmanus2777 6 років тому +43

      Men like them are in charge

    • @algeriaanalysis4328
      @algeriaanalysis4328 5 років тому +19

      But they've lost evenually...long live my great Algeria.

    • @seanmcmanus2777
      @seanmcmanus2777 4 роки тому

      @Alien Alien Try the Pentagon or the State Department

    • @markhenley3097
      @markhenley3097 4 роки тому +1

      @@seanmcmanus2777 Right now corrupt bureaucrats are in power.

    • @seanmcmanus2777
      @seanmcmanus2777 4 роки тому +11

      @@markhenley3097 You think pen pushers taking kickback didn't exist in 1958?

  • @mistervanwyk7405
    @mistervanwyk7405 Рік тому +3

    WWII, French in Algeria, USA in the Vietnam war, Portuguese colonial wars, Rhodesian Bush war, South Africa border war, ..... All the same story...... The armed forces were winning the war but in the end lost. Sometimes the WINNERS lose and the LOSERS win, and everytime this happen they are in fact, always the good guys and.. the whole world and sometimes even their own politicians are against them.... And in the end we find out that they are and were the good guys since the very beginning.

    • @aristo80
      @aristo80 Рік тому

      So ein Unsinn.

    • @farazsaleh
      @farazsaleh 11 місяців тому +4

      FLN=Hamas in Palestine
      May the Palestinian Armed Resistance be a way to achieve Liberation just like how Algerian Armed Resistance was one🤍✨
      🇵🇸❤️🇩🇿

    • @yosawin3018
      @yosawin3018 10 місяців тому

      You have Boer flag in your pfp so ofc you sympathize with these disgusting colonial overlords.
      And prove what exactly? That the condition was horrible and after that terrible colonization and war, everyone suffered despite the national liberation movement victory? If people had accepted the boots, they wouldn't rebel in the first place.

    • @yacine.3_2023
      @yacine.3_2023 8 місяців тому

      mental gymnastics