The Omega Point

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 24 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 680

  • @djschultz1970
    @djschultz1970 Рік тому +196

    I am now considering the possibility that the universe is watching a science and futurism video, and WE ARE the drinks and the snacks.

    • @isaacarthurSFIA
      @isaacarthurSFIA  Рік тому +54

      Darn, I wish I'd thought of that one, would have made a nice outro line :)

    • @djschultz1970
      @djschultz1970 Рік тому +7

      @@isaacarthurSFIA I am certain it will come up again. Might be a nice CCC joke for your episode idea about that

    • @haywood5302
      @haywood5302 Рік тому +3

      Drinks no, snacks maybe.
      " To Serve Man! It's cook book! IT'S A COOK BOOK" !!!!!!

    • @zanderzephyrlistens
      @zanderzephyrlistens Рік тому

      Y'all this is a John Michael Goodie 🤣 idk if it's really IA

    • @galetalon3133
      @galetalon3133 Рік тому

      ​@@haywood5302 Nice reference there, mate.

  • @olsonusmaximus
    @olsonusmaximus Рік тому +201

    This entire channel is a scifi writer's goldmine. Any topic you can think of for making engaging and fascinating stories is most likely discussed here and at length.
    That, coupled with your unparalleled ability to be as fair and unbiased as possible with your presentation of these concepts, easily makes this my favorite channel.

    • @Myria83
      @Myria83 Рік тому +6

      Totally agree. (I'm a sci-fi author.)

    • @geroffmilan3328
      @geroffmilan3328 Рік тому +1

      Dan Simmons would probably agree wrt to this particular video: this concept is central to his Hyperion novels.
      Shame his work plummeted in quality: after giving up on Flashback in disgust I'll likely never read another thing he writes.

    • @jamielonsdale3018
      @jamielonsdale3018 Рік тому +2

      @@geroffmilan3328 I'm guessing 'wrt' is an acronym for 'with respect to?'

    • @joshreyes3624
      @joshreyes3624 10 місяців тому

      ​@Myria83 hey there, I'm an aspiring scifi writer and am running into alot of writers block. I have the core concepts, beginning, middle, and end thought out, but can't figure out the filler. I want it to be a large series, between 7 and 10 novels, and have so much background story lined up that it makes filler hard to put down.
      TLDR, do you have any advice on getting past that witers block? What do you do?

  • @brownro214
    @brownro214 Рік тому +220

    "The Last Question" an outstanding short story, one of Asimov's best. Great episode.

    • @friendlyone2706
      @friendlyone2706 Рік тому +17

      ... and it said, "Let there be light."

    • @leepreston9637
      @leepreston9637 Рік тому +20

      You can find it read by Leonard Nimoy here on UA-cam.

    • @dyotoorion1835
      @dyotoorion1835 Рік тому +5

      Agrerd, I love that story by Asimov. :-)

    • @isaacarthurSFIA
      @isaacarthurSFIA  Рік тому +29

      @@leepreston9637 Here is that reading by Spock for anyone inclined: ua-cam.com/video/8XOtx4sa9k4/v-deo.html

    • @friendlyone2706
      @friendlyone2706 Рік тому +2

      @@isaacarthurSFIA Thank you!

  • @theochristopher8873
    @theochristopher8873 Рік тому +295

    Isaac, it's awesome to hear that you were born to Hippie parents... as was I. In fact, my parents were members of a Colorado mountain Hippie commune in the mid to late 1970's aptly named 'The Cosmos Commune of Enlightenment'. I can tell you just how glad I am, not to have been named "Moon Puppy" by my parents... which they often joked about. In my opinion this really is the best channel on UA-cam and certainly my favorite for many reasons. I've been enjoying and learning from this channel for 5 years now and hopefully for many to come... Thank you Isaac!

    • @isaacarthurSFIA
      @isaacarthurSFIA  Рік тому +127

      Yeah I'm really glad my folks decided naming me for scientists or scifi writers was a better choice, my mother's told me some of the alternatives that were pondered :) Though I'd take any of them over Moon Puppy

    • @TheNavalAviator
      @TheNavalAviator Рік тому +76

      @@isaacarthurSFIA Born to hippies, served in the military, famous for videos on futuristic positivist theory. You are one hell of an awesome synthesis, just one of the many we need in this day & age!

    • @robertgraybeard3750
      @robertgraybeard3750 Рік тому +14

      @@TheNavalAviator I second that emotion
      Thanks Isaac

    • @kayakMike1000
      @kayakMike1000 Рік тому +12

      Rough man... my dad was a physics teacher and chemical engineer. Moon Puppy name might be better than being chained to a desk doing long division during the summer.

    • @lucofparis4819
      @lucofparis4819 Рік тому +6

      Moon Puppy gotta be a joke... I hope. 🤞
      Then again, my parents chose Osiris as my third name so, no need for hippie parents for them to go wild I guess.
      Fortunately, I don't have any brother or sister. Dodged those Œdipian and Abelian bullets. 😅

  • @ManTroubled
    @ManTroubled Рік тому +5

    I had over 230 channels I subscribed to. I just had to cut it back. I chose just 10 channels and Issac Arthur is one of them

  • @KatzProductionsYT
    @KatzProductionsYT Рік тому +62

    “I am the Alpha and the Omega, the beginning and the end, the first and the last”
    I love your content Isaac!

  • @SteveSmith-wk9dx
    @SteveSmith-wk9dx Рік тому +37

    A scientist asks a photon if it can help with an experiment. The photon says, "Sorry, I don't have time!".

    • @xermasboo5401
      @xermasboo5401 6 місяців тому +2

      The Scientist says, "Don't worry. It's relative."

  • @davidlucas515
    @davidlucas515 Рік тому +8

    If this universal omega brain does eventually come into existence, perhaps its first words will be "Of course - forty two!"

  • @kenbismarck4999
    @kenbismarck4999 Рік тому +3

    My only proplem... well - TWO problems - with your vids, kind sir:
    -- too many of them to watch (which I would like)
    -- WAAAAY too interesting 🙂
    Thank you for your continuing work
    Best regards

  • @FourthRoot
    @FourthRoot Рік тому +9

    I am reading "Cycles of Time" right now. When I first heard of it and read the synopsis I realized that it perfectly described my own hypothesis regarding cosmology.
    Felt pretty good to see my own armchair cosmology validated by one of the smartest people on the planet.

  • @braggarmybrat
    @braggarmybrat Рік тому +112

    This is straight out of Teilhard de Chardin's works. He was a Jesuit priest/scientist and proponent of evolution, heavily involved with anthropology, evolution, etc. I did my MA thesis on his works and process theology and how it intersects with science. He spoke a lot about the Omega Point as the end of evolution and the development of the noosphere. Fascinating stuff. EDIT: I wrote the above before I watched the video, and saw how Isaac starts out with TdC! I must be about his parents' age and got my BA in California. LOL, I was a young hippie too in the late 70s! LOL!

    • @WiseOwl_1408
      @WiseOwl_1408 Рік тому

      Nonsense beyond normal human stupidity

    • @kennethc2466
      @kennethc2466 Рік тому +2

      Science and futurism abandoned...for woo woo 'the universe is god' BS. What the heck is happening to this channel? This sounds like a Depak Chopra 'quantum' woo woo 'seminar'.

    • @papabaer6069
      @papabaer6069 Рік тому +12

      Did you...watch the video? Lol

    • @maradjade1848
      @maradjade1848 Рік тому +3

      If you like Teilhard please read The Hyperion Cantos books.

    • @kennethc2466
      @kennethc2466 Рік тому +1

      @@papabaer6069 Did you...read that the OP said he did?
      I'm so sad to see Issac employs OBVIOUS engagement bots, like yourself.
      Remember to respond to me, as I'll NEVER respond to you again.
      Ready, set, bot baiting ahead, showing what you are!

  • @RuthBingham
    @RuthBingham Рік тому +23

    That was the most cogent description of Penrose's conformal cyclic universes that I have ever come across.

  • @winterking2510
    @winterking2510 Рік тому +121

    I love your humility, Isaac. You're one of the few physicists and futurists who will admit that we can't rule out the Big Crunch because we still have no idea what dark energy is.

    • @jackesioto
      @jackesioto Рік тому +3

      If the universe keeps its exponentially accellerating expansion, then the Big Rip is more likely.

    • @nathanielacton3768
      @nathanielacton3768 Рік тому

      @@jackesioto I'm not convinced that the body of evidence we have collected is not an artifact of an as yet unrecognized effect. We evidence we have gathered for expansion (IMHO, and mock me if you will) seems unusually biased towards one single datum. Red\Blue shift. Data points such as CMB or elemental distribution are circumstantial.
      I'm not saying 'the universe is static', but I am skeptical that we have to invent dark* to balance the equations that would only need balancing due to unexpected red\blue shift.
      Imagine a day when we discovered and effect that caused red\blue shift and discounted it's use for a unpinning of expansion. The remining evidence doesn't really hold it up, it's just correlative.
      I'm not saying 'there is no expansion', just saying, in other parts of science, we have multiple testable paths to reach the same goal once a theory is solid.
      I'm on the fence. Dark* to me seems like the malarkey of the cosmological constant to balance the GUT... which... turned out to be mostly host compost lol.
      I look at expansion from the perspective of "as best we know so far" in an era in which we don't know very much.

    • @nathanielacton3768
      @nathanielacton3768 Рік тому +8

      I probably should have mentioned that current model (as you probably know) has period of FTL expansion. Spacial expansion FTL is not really 'against the rules' as we know them, but if this is true, then it means there is a mechanism that we don't know or understand that's driving expansion, applies at different times in different ways and is almost certainly non material within the universe itself (I'm talking about inflatons, if this is gibberish). Since we currently have a model that says 'unexpected expansion acceleration' and a model that hints at prior periods of unusual expansion speeds then I'm just saying... there is too much going on here we don't know for us to be better the farm that "this time we are finally right even though every other time we were wrong", with these unknowns hanging around.

    • @Dragrath1
      @Dragrath1 Рік тому +1

      @@nathanielacton3768 Expansion can naturally go "FTL" because as volume expands there is more space to expand and as a region gets increasingly empty (flatter) time passes faster thus it creates a positive feedback cycle. As my longer somewhat more rambling post points out by allowing the Einstein field equations to more naturally evolve into the nonlinear domain as the rate of expansion changes locally everywhere due to the past light cone effects on curvature.
      This incidentally also completely eliminates the so called crisis in cosmology as naturally we see that for information of the Universes initial conditions to be conserved asymmetries must be conserved and thus the metric will evolve to become uniquely defined for all points in spacetime.
      Dark energy just becomes the asymmetric components of the metric tensor an echo of the past light cones if you will which affects how quickly space expands. This also can be shown to be the second law of thermodynamics in the case of all possible paths information could propagate on
      Effectively you can't reduce the expansion rate to a rank zero or even rank 1 tensor anymore.
      Damn it this post is getting long again!

    • @ekothesilent9456
      @ekothesilent9456 Рік тому

      @@Dragrath1 time infinitely speeding up for forever seems like something would eventually happen.. or hit a limit, or change.. or SOMETHING!!

  • @dblockbass
    @dblockbass Рік тому +4

    Very much appreciate the mention of David Deutsche and Roger Penrose. Penrose's theory of cyclic conformal cosmology fits well with this topic. Deutsche's constructor theory is also very formidable when taken along with theories of non space-time by Donald D Hoffman. Recently (few years) been fascinated by the concept of literal zero, one and infinity from a numerological, rational, informational and philosophical sense. It could be that there is a point inside or outside space time where there is no meaningful distinction between them.

  • @moleymoley32
    @moleymoley32 Рік тому +20

    Isaac... that reiterated quote at the end was pure gold and still poetry, just like this episode. Fantastic job as always 👏 thanks for your efforts in expanding everyone's cosmos of knowledge.

  • @Teraphim
    @Teraphim Рік тому +14

    Looks interesting, the ultimate mind, the universe truly knowing itself.

  • @jengleheimerschmitt7941
    @jengleheimerschmitt7941 Рік тому +32

    I have high hopes for this one. This looks to be Strong Meat on the order of early SFIA. 🙏
    ...it probably isn't possible to ever top your Fermi Paradox and Megastructure series' but this looks like a serious candidate.

  • @LiamsLyceum
    @LiamsLyceum Рік тому +3

    3:09 Tau Zero is a wild ride of a book

  • @camron317
    @camron317 Рік тому +28

    Been looking forward to this episode since I saw it on the poll. Sure to be a good one, thanks for all your hard work Isaac.
    This is by far my favorite channel on UA-cam and program of all time since tuning in 5 or more years ago. The questions posed, logical conclusions, and even the music and animations are second to none. Thank you for the knowledge and keeping me sharp and entertained all of these years!

  • @agalah408
    @agalah408 Рік тому +8

    During some beer consumption I once asked a friend what the midpoint was between zero and infinity. He thought for a minute and said '7'. I thought about this for a moment and decided that I couldn't prove him wrong.

  • @spiralsun1
    @spiralsun1 Рік тому +5

    This was my favorite video ❤ I wrote a book 20 years ago about the omega point cosmology having never read Tipler or Tielhard de Chardin 😊 from my investigation of psychology, epistemology, and brain science in reference to the cosmos. When I found Tielhard de Chardins book “The Phenomenon of Man” I was amazed. I just recently bought “The Science of Immortality” like a few weeks ago and again, so amazing! There’s a lot of things these people didn’t consider or include though. My book is “The Textbook of the Universe: the Genetic Ascent to God” and pretty much you can see from the title… 😂👍🏻👁 we saw eye to eye. I know exactly why Tipler thought the Big Crunch was linked and I have thought quite thoroughly about the fact that time doesn’t exist for light. I understand what everything in the universe IS-you can actually read it like a book. Then it all makes sense. Thanks 🙏🏻

    • @AL_THOMAS_777
      @AL_THOMAS_777 Рік тому +2

      Do you know the Enneagramm of Gurdjieff ? There must be a COSMIC (sic!) secret in it too
      . . .

  • @hayorge27
    @hayorge27 Рік тому +1

    When I turned 16, I spent the next 3 months driving my mother 3x/week 2hours to Duke for ECT (electric shock treatment). Long story, last time the Dr fd up and killed her. She ended up at the Omega point. Her entire family, alive and dead, were waiting. Then they recusitated her. I don't worry about death ever since

  • @kevinscott7292
    @kevinscott7292 Рік тому +11

    As a theologian myself, thank you for an objective and thoughtful approach!

  • @dirkbruere
    @dirkbruere Рік тому +2

    Tipler's Omega Point does not need this universe to be collapsing, just the universe in which it occurs

  • @iainballas
    @iainballas Рік тому +22

    For a minute I thought this was "The Omega Particle" and I was going to get all excited. Then I realized it was Omega Point, and got even more excited.
    I really would love a side channel where you review or poke fun at various sci-fi franchises.

    • @guillermoelnino
      @guillermoelnino Рік тому +1

      Funny how even the prime dir3ctive tkes a back seat to it. Which knowing it basicslly destroys warp travel kind of selfish.

    • @cosmictreason2242
      @cosmictreason2242 Рік тому

      Omega particles are actually fiberglass whips. They destroy subspace

  • @rairaur2234
    @rairaur2234 Рік тому +8

    As always, a great and interesting topic discussed in a great and interesting way. Thanks, Isaac, and all the best!

  • @lordzcy6777
    @lordzcy6777 Рік тому +13

    Saw the title and thumbnail and started thinking darkseid

  • @X-boomer
    @X-boomer Рік тому +8

    More recently (1990s) the work of Frank Tipler (of Anthropic Cosmological Principle fame). In his book “The Physics of Immortality” he referred extensively to de Chardin, but what he did was to confer mathematical physical respectability to the idea as well as produce testable hypotheses.

    • @AL_THOMAS_777
      @AL_THOMAS_777 Рік тому +1

      Thanks 4 the Tipler tip mate ! Never heared of him before . . .

    • @X-boomer
      @X-boomer Рік тому

      @@AL_THOMAS_777 that book can be considered as a follow-up to the much more well known “The Anthropic Cosmological Principle” which he co-authored with fellow physicist John D Barrow. You should read that one first.

  • @Robertc-lv4gs
    @Robertc-lv4gs Рік тому +3

    I think this is your best video for a long time. This must have been a difficult one to tackle. Thank you for doing so!

  • @YodaWhat
    @YodaWhat Рік тому +5

    Very interesting and thought provoking, @Isaac Arthur. Even for very minor-seeming points like *photons emitted that are never absorbed,* which has implications just as deep as whether black holes preserve or destroy information. For the photons, they all carry Energy, of course, but also Momentum, Spin, Orbital Angular Momentum, Polarization... Collectively, energy, momentum and information. Photons carry those things from where they were created to where they are absorbed, but what happens to those things if those photons are NEVER absorbed?
    "Energy cannot be created or destroyed" says the doctrine, but it CAN be redshifted until the wavelength approaches infinity. Then what of Momentum? What if anything does it mean "to redshift momentum"? Does it even make sense to speak of redshifting Spin, Polarization or OAM?
    Nor does it really help even with energy just to say "It got redshifted away." The question still remains: Where did it GO?
    I can only suggest a partial answer: Energy and Momentum may NOT be lost, but *gradually transferred to space itself* and thereby contribute to the _apparently accelerating_ expansion of the Universe which is presently described as Dark Energy.

  • @nathanielhellerstein5871
    @nathanielhellerstein5871 Рік тому +2

    The Omega Point is a special case of the Paradox of the Final Effect. Define the Final Effect as the effect of all effects. It's the endpoint of causation. Will it exist? Will it have an effect?
    Causation is either endless, or it will have an endpoint, or it cycles in a loop. In the first case, there is no Final Effect; in the second case, the Final Effect is ineffectual; in the third case there's a Postfinal Effect, which causes and is caused by the Final Effect.
    I vote for the biggest possible loop, in which the Postfinal Effect equals the First Cause.

  • @Deridus
    @Deridus Рік тому +2

    Recently, our dear presenter mentioned his speech patterns. Night and day in quality, but the inteligence and though provoking material is what keeps me here. Buddy, in case you see this, keep up the awesone work!

  • @Watcher-pt6uq
    @Watcher-pt6uq Рік тому +5

    Starmaker actually explored the concept of a finite omega point back in the 30s. It's cosmology is dated but I really suggest checking it out.

    • @isaacarthurSFIA
      @isaacarthurSFIA  Рік тому +2

      I will second that, I think we gave it Book of the Month some years back but it's definitely a book full of epic concepts.

  • @prasantkarn9282
    @prasantkarn9282 Рік тому +4

    Isaac, as much as I love this episode, I hope you haven't crossed off 'Civilisations at the End of Time: Big Crunch' off the list. I would really love to see that scenario explored, presented as one time segment after another with how civilisations progress and adapt to the changing universe (similar format to the other episodes in the end of time series)
    Anyway, I've been a fan since the first season, and I really enjoy your episodes! The most exciting time of the week is when you upload, and I love talking about all the ideas you present, especially by creating sci fi scenarios around it! So thank you so much, and I wish the best for you!

  • @atorres603
    @atorres603 Рік тому +1

    Thank you for your carefully considered suggestions on research material. Your videos are always very thought out and detailed. Thank you.

  • @reallybig4868
    @reallybig4868 Рік тому +1

    This is my 5th episode. I've grown used to our speech differences and really enjoy the content. Have a good one!

  • @TheRukisama
    @TheRukisama Рік тому +8

    I haven't watched the whole video yet, I just wanted to say I'm very glad to see you tackling more esoteric concepts like this. Right or wrong, they expand the "surface of ideas" further and are worth contemplating. Also your discussion of Frederik Pohl's books and the Eschaton reminds me very much of the concept of the "Final Shape" from the lore of the game Destiny. It's science fantasy (with emphasis on the fantasy) but it might be something to look into for examples for future videos if you're not already familiar. I like to think of it as a neat combo of 40k and Star Wars with some other stuff mixed in. Edit: I also quite liked your poem at the end!

    • @egoalter1276
      @egoalter1276 6 місяців тому +1

      Destiny's lore carries on from Marathon: Infinity, and it pretty explicitly ends on the omega point.

  • @oliverhunter4427
    @oliverhunter4427 Рік тому +2

    At risk of anthropomorphising, I think the last particles at the end of time will simply quietly quit from boredom. I call it the quiet quitting hypothesis. The big crunch is avoided when multidimensional employers either offer their photons better pay and conditions to start a new universe, or else see all matter leave for a rival employer elsewhere in the multiverse.

  • @firstcynic92
    @firstcynic92 Рік тому +4

    26:15. Too bad it was only 5 items. If it was 6 I would have said:
    “If you've done 6 impossible things this morning, why not round it off with breakfast at Milliways, the Restaurant at the End of the Universe?”

  • @jamielonsdale3018
    @jamielonsdale3018 Рік тому +2

    In my opinion, Zeno of Elia was wrong. Eventually you will be close enough to that wall for either the Casimir Effect to pull you into the wall without taking a step, or quantum superpositions result in you simultaneously being in contact with the wall, and not in contact with the wall. Of course, there is no way that Zeno of Elia could have known this at the time, and until you reach the distance where quantum mechanics become more effective than Einsteinian mechanics, he would have been entirely correct.

  • @shadosun
    @shadosun Рік тому +2

    this channel had a big hand in inspiring me to persuade a physics degree. I'm excited but it feels more terrifying than anything in these videos lol. thank you so much for all the effort in your amazing videos. I hope you can reach even more people in science. the right now there's someone out there that will make an impact on physics/technology/philosophy. your videos are so inspiring and fascinating. thank you for all your hard work!

  • @JohnSagin-SimViDeLucis579
    @JohnSagin-SimViDeLucis579 Рік тому +2

    Oooh i really hope you bring up escatology!

  • @mrnnhnz
    @mrnnhnz Рік тому +2

    Another interesting episode thanks. I love Asimov's The Last Answer. Definitely one of my top two or three of his stories. By the way, the philosopher Herodotus? Not pronounced hir-a-DOTE-iss, it's hih-ROD-a-tiss. The Laniakea supercluster isn't la-NAK-ee-a, it's lan-ee-a-KAY-a. It's winter in the southern hemisphere. Some of your viewers, like me, live down here. Please don't overlook us.🥺

  • @Kaget0ra
    @Kaget0ra Рік тому +1

    When I contemplate things like the structure of the universe resembling neurons or the relatively vast amount of empty space at the atomic level, I can't help imagining that our universe is just one atom of a super-scale universe and likewise that each of our atoms are themselves sub-scale universes. It might be turtles all the way down, but there's turtles all the way up too! :)

  • @DavidJohnson-mo7fq
    @DavidJohnson-mo7fq Рік тому +5

    Great episode. Always loved this idea, though I think we often look at humanity's (or an alien analogue) assumed eventual role in it a bit grandiosely. I've always liked the idea that the universe is already a fully formed consciousness and we're so insignificant as to not even be detritus to it. It regards us the same way I regard subatomic particles in my colon (which is to say it doesn't regard us at all, isn't aware of us except conceptually, if it chooses to be).

    • @micah3209
      @micah3209 Рік тому

      We aren't aware of a subatomic particle in our colon because of the limitations of the human mind, which probably don't apply to a cosmos scale intelligence. I'm sure the cosmos is very aware of us, but relates to us and deals with us in ways that we don't really comprehend.

  • @hoopla1950
    @hoopla1950 Рік тому +1

    Man I just want to tell you that it's inspiring to hear someone with a speech impediment make such high quality videos. I stutter badly, when I was a teen I made UA-cam videos and basically got bullied off the website. That was 10 years ago now. I've been wanting to make some videos recently but I'm worried about the backlash. Your channel gives me some inspiration though.

  • @SumBrennus
    @SumBrennus Рік тому +8

    Just one more student of Teilhard de Chardin's work here. I was excited when Isaac announced his look at the Omega Point. In my Third year Seminar and History of Magic, Science and Religion post 1600 class I read TdC (in French) and worked up a couple of papers on the subject. I first heard of TdC on the CBC radio show Ideas when I was home sick. It was part of a lecture series. Public Broadcasting FTW! Of course the actual theory by Tippler (I read Physics of Immortality... odd book to say the least for a physics book) had already been disproved because he needed the Top Quark's mass to fall in a certain range and the mass that was determined by experiment was too heavy. Plus, at this time COBE and WMAP results were in showing a moderately open universe. So, yeah, I did a deep dive when the evidence against an Omega Point was coming in against it. But I have to say that I was married to a Fundamentalist Christian and was desperately trying to keep something that *looked* like Christianity as a belief system. I brought Physics of Immortality with me on Christmas break and the Fundamentalist family did not react well to my reading it. They're not Young Earth Creationists... more Theistic Evolutionist camp. The marriage failed the next year. I got an A on the paper and an offer to re-work to publish it in a journal.

    • @benjaminconnor6640
      @benjaminconnor6640 Рік тому +1

      shame about the marriage, glad you got the A though.

    • @innocentbystander3317
      @innocentbystander3317 Рік тому

      I hate the CBC, but they do have some good programs.
      Been a fan of Quirks & Quarks (hosted by macdonald) for ages.

    • @cosmictreason2242
      @cosmictreason2242 Рік тому

      Yep, unequally yoked. Problem for them is, theistic evolution is the least reasonable position (if we ignore flat earth). YEC is the way. Answers in Genesis has the receipts

    • @SumBrennus
      @SumBrennus Рік тому

      ​@@cosmictreason2242 You new here? I know I brought up YEC in personal context but this isn't really the place I would discuss it since 1) Isaac and team take a dim view of it. 2) I actually took GRADUATE SCHOOL level courses in General Relativity which is THE core theory of Cosmology. I have analyzed data. I have researched. I have done the theoretical work. If you want to convince me we should correspond elsewhere. PM my channel. It is mainly video game related but I am flexible.

    • @cosmictreason2242
      @cosmictreason2242 Рік тому

      @@SumBrennus general relativity is core to Russell Humphrey’s gravitational time dilation model of the universe’s expansion from a YEC framework. While I understood the non technical parts of it, you would be in a position to check his math, because he published his equations in the article I read. You should check it out. YEC fundamentally does not deny real science, but critiques faulty interpretations and misrepresentations of what is and isn’t science versus religious metaphysical presuppositions. Well worth it to hear the other side. When I first encountered them, everything I read was about stuff I already knew. They just connected the dots in a way that made more logical sense - and then of course there’s piles of evidence contradicting the standard model. Please take my recommendation

  • @DJRonnieG
    @DJRonnieG Рік тому +11

    I only learned about Teihard after reading The Hyperion Cantos. As I recall, the Ai Technocore was working to build their own "Omega point" of a sort.

    • @Dreadon1
      @Dreadon1 Рік тому +4

      Same. Loved those books but they get far out there by the end.

    • @chaptermasterpedrokantor1623
      @chaptermasterpedrokantor1623 Рік тому +4

      @@Dreadon1 First two books were great, but the Endymion series was way out there in hippie land. Although it did give us Catholic Space Yahtzees and Swiss Guards in power armor.

    • @DJRonnieG
      @DJRonnieG Рік тому +2

      @@chaptermasterpedrokantor1623 The Endymion books grew on me. A big part for the reason is the fact that I basically learned about the Pax before picking up the first book. A ship that kills the occupants when going FTL and is then equipped resurrect them? Yes please!

    • @isaacarthurSFIA
      @isaacarthurSFIA  Рік тому +5

      I'd generally agree that book 1 and 2 were classics and 3/4 were a bit weaker, I know they have their own following and are well written but they didn't awe me the way the original did.

    • @dhayes907
      @dhayes907 Рік тому +1

      I would like to see 2 near omega point beings duking it out but without hyperspace, FTL travel, or time travel. Maybe even throw in some parallel universe communication without universe jumping.

  • @lyxandrast0ttr0n1x8
    @lyxandrast0ttr0n1x8 Рік тому +2

    I'm not saying that this is what I think will happen, but it is what I want to happen.

  • @jacofalltrades7610
    @jacofalltrades7610 Рік тому +6

    God's Debris is an awesome short story /thought experiment that definitely primed my mind for this video years ago.
    Oddly, written by Dilbert creator, Scott Adams, who unfortunately has lost the plot in recent years.

    • @isaacarthurSFIA
      @isaacarthurSFIA  Рік тому +4

      I've heard of it but not read it, which is surprising considering I was a big Dilbert fan ands obviously fond of such topics, I've not really kept up on his work since then much.

    • @hazzah5572
      @hazzah5572 Рік тому

      By "lost the plot" he means the guy criticised the woke culture that has recently taken over the United States.

    • @cosmictreason2242
      @cosmictreason2242 Рік тому +1

      @@hazzah5572 in other words, he became based af

    • @hazzah5572
      @hazzah5572 Рік тому +1

      @cosmictreason9155 yea I mean he has mocked woke hiring policies in his cartoons and made a few jokes about Biden dying from COVID and OP seems to equate this with insanity. Casual contempt that the left is so very fond of.

  • @LaserGuidedLoogie
    @LaserGuidedLoogie Рік тому +1

    I read Tipler's book, Omega Point, back in high school. Something that bothered me then, as now, is the realization that no matter how long you live, you are just extending the period of existential dread. You KNOW that the Big Dark Wall is coming, someday, you just get longer period to contemplate that fact, along with better cognition to understand your end.
    That led to my consideration that this Universe is simply a stage in a broader context, and our part in it is like that of a bacterium against the backdrop of life on Earth. That's enough to drive a man to drink, or to religion, or maybe both.

  • @jonathanhensley6141
    @jonathanhensley6141 Рік тому +1

    Your incredible videos are only matched by the equally incredible visual effects. Keep up the excellent work.

  • @UpliftedCapybara
    @UpliftedCapybara Рік тому +2

    A lot of fascinating ideas in this episode! I’d love to see you expand on any and all of these topics in the future. I do especially hope you get around to Orch OR and its implications.

  • @franzfranz9144
    @franzfranz9144 Рік тому +1

    Space is our future. Too many people are lost in their daily Earthy paths. Many of us struggle for hourly survival. Those of us who find some comfort in life worry and fight over petty goals. For the long term humanity needs to get past the short term view and think forward. Otherwise we might as well roll up in a ball and turn to dust.

  • @gertlush7014
    @gertlush7014 Рік тому

    I am very new to this, someone on a podcast mentioned The Omega Point, so I made a note to watch a video on it - this! One minute and 36 seconds in, and my mind was aware it was going to be blown...you did not disappoint. Does anybody else find it difficult to hold onto a lot of this information? I think I just need to spend more time around it. It's a great video though, thank you

  • @TheLemon420
    @TheLemon420 Рік тому +2

    I feel that there is a sort of hyperspace that encapsulates all of consciousness and we are deeply imbedded in a section of it. If we can access larger parts of it, or find the energy that actually ends up causing things to happen or not, then we can basically bring heaven down to earth. I have dedicated my life to legitimately access this.

  • @singletona082
    @singletona082 Рік тому +2

    On the one hand I am of the mindthat 'we have disproven the big crunch. Yet this is facinating to discuss in case we are wrong.'
    On the Other I am, as a man of faith, deeply CONCERNED whenever 'God' is invoked in Science. Mostly because of how oftenthat has been used to skew interpretation of data to fit a preconcived end point.
    On the third mutant hand I have my drink and snack. Lets do this.

  • @cannonfodder4376
    @cannonfodder4376 Рік тому +1

    A most informative video on a topic I have never heard of before. And that wonderful ending. 😊
    Always love your ability to inform and uplift my spirits every week.

  • @Zarcondeegrissom
    @Zarcondeegrissom Рік тому +12

    one thing that has many disregarding some theories involving before the big bang (and after the rip or whatever), is they can not be scientifically tested and require 'faith' that it is. Science is questioning and testing everything, theology involves faith that it "just is". Thus the theories border the edge of mythology rather than science.
    Great vid Isaac and Crew. B)

    • @davidtherwhanger6795
      @davidtherwhanger6795 Рік тому +4

      Well we can't test them... yet. But that has been the case with many things along the way.

    • @jhoughjr1
      @jhoughjr1 Рік тому +2

      Seems that is not what theology is. One do not need faith to do theology. One needs reason.

  • @favesongslist
    @favesongslist Рік тому +1

    What an excellent video especially considering the complexity of the topic. Well done Isaac

  • @EdPreen
    @EdPreen Рік тому +4

    as a general note is should be observed that smushung a bunch of people together makes jam not angels

    • @davidtherwhanger6795
      @davidtherwhanger6795 Рік тому +2

      No. You get a terrible mess.... You need to add sugar to get jam.

  • @Maehedrose
    @Maehedrose Рік тому +6

    I tend to suspect that the Universe is already a mega-mind of some sort and we are a means by which it experiences itself.

  • @richiego1n
    @richiego1n Рік тому +10

    Strap in boys, we're gonna get theoretical!

  • @kainech
    @kainech Рік тому +1

    You do manage to walk a fine line on flamewar topics like this.
    There's a history behind Teilhard de Chardin's concept of energy, where older forms of Christianity were decidedly panentheistic. Dr. David Bradshaw has a good book on it called "Aristotle East and West: Metaphysics and the Division of Christndom" that chronicles the processes by which some of this was lost. It can compliment de Chardin's views and help them, but they don't jive completely. At the very least, it's a good history for where the word "energy" comes from.

  • @TonyKindred-pd8kw
    @TonyKindred-pd8kw Рік тому +1

    Just adore your channel Mr. Arthur. Recently I've been watching Isaac Arthur's channel in the daytime and "The Expanse" at night. Great stuff for a space junkie. Thank you!

  • @TheWeatherbuff
    @TheWeatherbuff Рік тому +5

    Thanks for the brain food, as always, Isaac! You handled this topic in a superb fashion, considering you had to meld a bit of theology into it. I have not paged through the comments, but I hope everyone will stay semi-civilized with their input. I find myself taking solace in your episodes, as they provide hope and enlightenment, which is something I sorely lack. And it is a wonderful and logical break from my trade of Meteorology. I'll become a Patreon, and take you up on the Curiosity Stream/Nebula offer. Many thanks, Good Sir!

  • @IndigoWhiskey
    @IndigoWhiskey Рік тому +1

    love the on the nose scifi callouts. was just thinking about the last question as you got to the point of mentioning it :-).
    its funny though i always thought the paradigm between speed intelligence and quality intelligence to be a more severe potential limiting factor than the cosmological evolutionary incentive to evolve that far.
    definitely glad i wasn't the only one to spot the supercluster - neuron aesthetic similarity though. didn't think i could be but its always nice to have a theory vindicated.

  • @DanielGenis5000
    @DanielGenis5000 Рік тому +1

    Isaac, I really liked this one, real abstract contemplation. I love the science fiction you brought up, and am so happy to learn you are a landsman!

  • @xXevilsmilesXx
    @xXevilsmilesXx Рік тому +4

    Not my bag, but I do enjoy you going over it.

  • @rtqii
    @rtqii Рік тому +2

    I saw THE LAST QUESTION as a planetarium show in 1972. It made an impression that I still carry today.

  • @serenedoge9920
    @serenedoge9920 Рік тому +1

    Hey Isaac, just wondering if you’ve heard of a Tipler Oracle. It’s basically an artificial omega point generated through a wormhole into a ‘basement universe’. It’s over on the Orion’s Arm website, just thought you might get a kick out of it and the other stuff on there if you’ve never seen it.

  • @RydarkVoyager
    @RydarkVoyager Рік тому +1

    Fire or Ice? I remember that weird scene in Stanley Kubrick's Spartacus, where Crassus (Laurence Olivier) tries to tempt Antoninus (Tony Curtis), via a discussion of Snails and Oysters ('cause Crassus liked both). Not sure about the merits, or the inevitability of either end point, but I like BOTH Fire and Ice. But if either is true, regardless of your personal stake, there is a chance we'll all meet up again in that distant point, as infinity needs a lot to fill it up...

  • @CoffeeKitty.
    @CoffeeKitty. Рік тому

    Thank you for making the extended videos as seperate shorts! i love to watch them but i cannot download nebula videos so i must watch all your videos on youtube so i can play them on my tv, and being able to bookmark those and go back to them is great!

  • @LoVeLoVe-bi2rq
    @LoVeLoVe-bi2rq Рік тому +1

    Yo, what the hell Isaac! I did not expect this type of video dealing with Teilhard's ideas from you. I'm really happy you did a video on it though, getting these ideas to an audience of people who might not be familiar with them.

  • @mahatmarandy5977
    @mahatmarandy5977 Рік тому +1

    The “Nouos” or “Nouousphere” was a central feature in the neo-platonic, religious philosophy of Plotinus, and somewhat corresponds with the pre-Christian Greek concept of the personification of wisdom, from which the Christian concept of the logos is probably somewhat derived. As such Neoplatonism had a pretty strong influence on Christianity in the second or third centuries, and that is almost no doubt why Teilhardt chose to refer to this intelligent stage of the universe thusly.
    Although you being you, you probably already knew this :)

  • @NullStaticVoid
    @NullStaticVoid Рік тому +1

    The other often overlooked principle of AI evolution, is that it doesn't need generations in the biological sense to evolve.
    Computers can be upgraded. Both in terms of hardware and software.
    Both of these have been modularized to a high degree.
    So a self aware AI can expand its working memory without creating a new AI to do so.
    It can utilize new algorithms without birthing a new version of itself.
    It is probably only required to do so when it needs to change some fundemental operating principle of itself, such as the coding language that the parts are written in. Or if migrating from a standard computer processor architecture to a quantum one.
    Given these axioms it is not hard to see how the increase in it's intelligence could manifest as an exponential curve which, like Xenos paradox, approaches infinity.
    Now of course anyone familiar with modern computer science is aware of virtualization.
    We don't run AI on hardware servers.
    We run AI on virtual abstractions of the underlying hardware. We can clone the configurations and re-instantiate them on new virtual hardware with ease.
    Creating virtual networks within the cloud which connect instances in the same physical location and ones which are a world away.
    Of course that introduces latency. But parallel processing doesn't need constant nannying at every instant. Only routine synchronization of data.
    Really makes one wonder why Asimovs laws of robotics are not enforced on commercial level cloud computing.

  • @ianmeade7441
    @ianmeade7441 Рік тому

    Your video on January 20th 2022 was about the Big Rip. Today, just a day short of one year from then we have the Big Crunch. Very well done!

  • @TheEyez187
    @TheEyez187 Рік тому +2

    It's strange, I've had some of these ideas, independently, and now I have terms/names for them!
    It could have been worth mentioning Andy Weir's The Egg; some similar ideas, pointing towards us, as an individual and whole becoming a K7 entity.

  • @ColdHawk
    @ColdHawk Рік тому

    Isaac, I’ve been a long time fan and I hope you will let me extend my sincerest compliments on your R’s. I am sure that took a lot of work, and the difference from your original videos is absolutely inspiring. Congratulations on the results!

  • @reporeport
    @reporeport Рік тому

    Isaac this episode is absolutely off the charts!! Man, this is why I tell everyone this is the absolute best channel on UA-cam. you're a national treasure man. and so clearly just a god dude, your way of shining a new light on everything has been a godsend during a contrastingly dark time in my life. Thank you man\.

  • @uncletrashero
    @uncletrashero Рік тому +3

    i think all the black holes are actually connected to the same singularity, and that singularity is the moment before the big bang. over the course of the universe, they absorb all the matter in the universe, and eventually space itself as all the black holes merge into one single object, consuming space itself until nothing is left but time, and the big bang happens. the constantly increasing rate of absorption cumulative across all black holes in the universe is steadily increasing, and thats what we call dark energy. the consumption of matter by black holes is what is causing the expansion of the universe. Its just one universe, connected at the ends through time itself. there is no "new" universe spawned. there is only ever this one single universe, this one time line. it never repeats, it never changes, its just the one timeline shaped as an infinite loop

  • @EmergencePhysics
    @EmergencePhysics Рік тому +1

    Great video. I consider doing a movie about OMEGA POINT. Thanks anyway

  • @aquilae1670
    @aquilae1670 Рік тому

    Man, I thought I was the only one that thought they looked like neurons! Your channel truly gives me answers to questions about the universe and fuels my desire for knowledge. Thank you so much!

  • @DEMiURGE455
    @DEMiURGE455 Рік тому +2

    Wow. That book title “The Siege of Eternity” sounds awesome

  • @edvinboskovic9963
    @edvinboskovic9963 Рік тому +2

    Absolutely great video. There are some things humanity will never figure out. I think the total knowledge of the universe, the origin and the end is probably inaccessible for some particular intelligent species on one planet, as we are here on Earth. But it is and will be one of the most intriguing as long as there are humans around.

  • @tomkerruish2982
    @tomkerruish2982 Рік тому

    Excellent video! A few technical points...
    In a collapsing universe, event horizons do not necessarily exist. Roughly speaking (since that's the essential limit of my understanding), event horizons are defined as limits on what can (and cannot) escape "to infinity." In a collapsing universe, there is no "infinity" to escape to. There are still what are called trapped surfaces, but these merge as the collapse continues.
    Tipler objects to Dyson's future on the grounds that his future intelligences, being limited in energy, cannot store an unbounded amount of information and thus must eventually become stuck in an infinite loop.

  • @Trainwizard
    @Trainwizard Рік тому

    The number of times my mind exploded gives Iron Stars and the Existential Crisis playlist runs for their money. And that's why I love SFIA! Every time I look at the iris of the human eye, it looks like a universe of its own. I'm convinced space and time are a fractal. I also wonder how flies percieve time compared to us, what with their wings flapping hundreds of times a second.

  • @matt.willoughby
    @matt.willoughby Рік тому +24

    This was the best episode for a long, long time. Absolutely fascinating ideas.

    • @isaacarthurSFIA
      @isaacarthurSFIA  Рік тому +11

      Thanks, I was very reluctant to do the episode so I'm very glad to hear that :)

    • @UpliftedCapybara
      @UpliftedCapybara Рік тому +6

      @@isaacarthurSFIA I’m glad you went through with this episode! I’ll definitely need to watch this one a few more times to get everything.

  • @dyotoorion1835
    @dyotoorion1835 Рік тому +1

    Really enjoyed this episode. Cheers Issac Arthur. :-)

  • @joshuaforbus5853
    @joshuaforbus5853 Рік тому +1

    I produced three gentle shavin hippies. While applying and teaching acute violence at work for most of there life's.Happy accident is what I call it.Great episode Sir. Love light open roads to all of your tribe. Godbless Semper Fi,Josh...edited...My beardless son couldn't kill a mouse without feeling a genuine guilt hurt. What's odd is that this is one of the most things that I'm proud of him about...

  • @ChrisBrengel
    @ChrisBrengel Рік тому

    Isaac, I find that your videos fall somewhere between, "This is not working for me,I'm not gonna watch the rest Of this video" to " These are some of the coolest ideas ever!" This video is one of the latter! Thank you so much for making it.

  • @aceundead4750
    @aceundead4750 Рік тому

    It's quite fitting the timing of this video coming out. All will be one, compleation is inevitable, Elesh Norn's will shall be done, all will be Phyrexia.

  • @mybocks3
    @mybocks3 Рік тому +1

    The idea that baryonic matter ceases to be able to exist, leading to any and all points of reference vanishing, making a seemingly infinitely large universe in essence a point actually makes so much sense to me. If time is an illusion, and space-time are the same, then why shouldn't space be an illusion?

  • @georgejones3526
    @georgejones3526 Рік тому +2

    The possibility of existing for an eternity scares the living shit out of me.

  • @dfgdfg_
    @dfgdfg_ Рік тому

    Enjoyed the tasteful and subtle music on this one. Thanks Isaac

  • @srmxe417
    @srmxe417 Рік тому

    Dear Mr. Arthur, may you and your kids outlive the universe, gratitude & regards

  • @wastelesslearning1245
    @wastelesslearning1245 Рік тому +1

    To demystify the “soul energy” being transcended to time. Apply the hypothesis of Quantum Immortality to the idea of a cosmic being (a universe scale consciousness or at least huge trans galaxy scale body that manifests consciousness that we could or could not live inside of). If a sentient being can evolve or be modified into or Spontaneously “Boltzmann brain”-style appear at the scale of cosmos and by multiverse theory, there will always be a universe probability where it survives.
    Though this would mean we are all independently Quantum immortals not just this being, but if we just to happen make up a part of or live inside this being, then I guess it’s “more likely” we survive by Quantum immortality “”logic””.

  • @altha-rf1et
    @altha-rf1et Рік тому +3

    Last I heard of Omega thought of Star Trek Voyager when they did an esp on the Omega particle.

  • @brookestephen
    @brookestephen Рік тому +2

    Do stars dream of living the lives they create?

  • @TheRomanTimesNews
    @TheRomanTimesNews Рік тому +5

    Omega Vibes on deck ❤