This is so ridiculous that someone can deem what’s Canadian or not Canadian enough. It’s completely subjective… I can’t believe this was even proposed.
@Kenny Omega's DorsaI Cavity Wrong tyrant! You nor government should NOT decide what is so called "Canadian. Roads and schools are Anot the same as stuff we watch onli e on your own devices that should be our choice alone and not government to decide. They do NOT know what is best for us. We don't even know or have a clear definition of "canadian" that likely as liberal government and senators have done will be pro-liberal, woke and cotnetn by minority of canadian population and not the people and yt race that represent the majority of canada.
When a country's economy is not flourishing, when the cost of living is at record highs, Canadian art and entertainment content diminishes considerably. What's the point of increasing optics for Canadian art and entertainment when artist are too busy trying desperately to survive and are unable to produce arts and entertainment?
You should be judged by the merit of your work not have the government put its finger on the scale. Linus Tech Tips is perhaps one of the most influential content providers on UA-cam because of the merit of his work. Forcing content providers to go through bureaucratic nonsense to prove their "Canadianess" is essentially a Monty Python skit that content providers will have to endure. It's unnecessary and ultimately will push Canadian providers who fail to jump though those hoops down the prioritized provider list. This is a law in search of a problem rather than a problem in search of a legal solution.
@@HoagMurkula or Google accounts registered in Canada.. if logged into Google they still are able to figure out your geo location based on other inputs
It passed the house with the support of the ndp, bloc, majority of the green party and the liberals. Sad day for canadian internet users and content makers. Today is the start of the not free internet Where the crtc gets to decide what we see, and what gets made.
@@JoElMa22 any content not considered "canadian" enough by liberal governmnet while be deprioritized and unpromoted and censored from its recommendation and algoritms. It says so in the bill which you should read and not believe liberal lies.
Listen the best Canadian artists comics and musicians make it big in USA anyway. I have always been so proud of them but if I want to see content from other countries that is my right. JJ is right this bill is a solution looking for a problem. JJ also referred to ideology which is what it is really about I.e. giving government the levers to direct the narrative and suppress so called “disinformation “ aka conservative thought.
The first Canadian I’ve ever heard to truly pronounce about as “aboot”. I try to convince my American friends that we typically pronounce it as “aboat”….but now this guy ruined all my hard work.
I heard something about the bill only showing Canadian UA-cams on UA-cam. And blocking you from watching non-Canadian UA-camrs. Can I have clearance on that and wether if its true or not?
not limited to only Canadian you tubers but when you search for something it'll try recommending only Canadian stuff to you. You'd have to search harder for non Canadian content. As opposed to getting the best video out there. It reminds me of how china said no UA-cam no google, you have to use the china versions. but a baby step version
Been noticing this the day the bill passed. It's rather frustrating and interesting at the same time...I keep finding small Canadian content creators both on UA-cam searches and on my fyp TikToks
@@jagsosa4414 not just Canadian content, it's what the CRTC deems as Canadian content. The CRTC can and has been used as a tool of censorship by not permitting certain programming due to it not being "Canadian enough" by arbitrary standards.
I’d like to agree with the elevator pitch portion of the video in that content consumers deserve to have control over the content viewing experience… which we do not have. I love political and cultural content, and I’d love to see more Canadian content but somehow I get american political content shoehorned into my feed. The notion that algorithms are working in anyone’s favour but UA-cam’s is ridiculous to me, and that is exactly why I believe some intervention is warranted. Not that I agree with all the stipulations of C11 but I don’t agree with the hysterical backlash it gets either.
More like NAY and shameful by govt dictstors to decide what we watch is "canadian" or not and same thing for canadian creators to be censored by govt with content that they are against. A sad day for canadian freedom like free speech to censor disagreeing opinion such as conservstive thought or content we enjoy that will be removed nd replace for garbage content made by government that we hate and dont want to watch.
I would say the Bill would help Canadians making any sort of content, not particularly content related to Canada, to get financial help from Canada. Like songs by BNL, Anne Murray, Sarah McLachlan, and so forth, are they really singing Canadian culture? Or are their songs keep getting airtime on Canadian radios simply because the songs were made by Canadians, which benefitted those traditional content creators. Otherwise all radios and TVs would be just American music and TV. And wouldn't those UA-camrs who are Canadians get more ad views and therefore more money from advertisers in Canada? Isn't that great for a Canadian who just starts out making content?
@@aztaska The government deciding what you can and cannot see is censorship. It's #1 goal is the children, parents are struggling to put food on the table because we're taxed to death and have to work more, so the kids get their iPad and see only LGBT and BLM shit! They want to shutdown dissent, and ultimately control what you see! Leftists talk about inclusivity and tolerance, but only from their power hungry, virtue signalling point of view. They can't stand that their are people out their like myself who still hold traditional values and beliefs. They hate it! We already have the CBC, CTV, Global, etc, brainwashing the masses, and now enter bill C-11.
Dude I wanna watch content because it’s good content. I don’t care where it was made. Also making content on UA-cam is different then traditional tv media, all you need is a $40 phone to record and post content. Who the hell needs finance aid to create content when all u need is a $40 phone. This bill is ONLY benefiting large legacy media company’s.
the problem is it would push bad content artificially higher. people wont watch something that is bad and that will refelct in statistics. like saying no one bought a product that was designed for winter when it was only shown to people in hot climates. it causes a chain reaction that results in hard to find good content for the user and less revenue for the creator.
There was this hilarious moment on LTT where Linus was saying "It's basically a money-grab" until one of his writers came up and said "I got my start through a program funded by the CRTC"... and yeah, that is exactly the point, no one realizes what it does until it directly affects them or something they do. Some may not want it but there are many that owe their livelihoods to the additional funding for programs, tv/filmmaking, education ect... CRTC is not some boogeyman out to censor things... people are absolute BS alarmists in that regard.
This bill will not fundamentally change our online experiences.... if anything, it will improve access for content creators to other Canadians by prioritizing it over foreign content...
Sooooooooooooooooo We didn't care if they controlled TV or the Radio but god forbid they start to regulate internet content which is essentially taking over through streaming tv shows? Sorry but if there is an issue with this then shouldn't the issue have been with them controlling Radio and TV before this was even mentioned? Makes you wonder why wasn't this guy really lobbying before? Oh because it didn't personally affect his $$$$$$$$$$$$$$. That being said I am entirely against censorship but I am also against idiocy and when I see people like this I can't stand them. Sorry but all credibility is lost when you essentially say you have been fine with the censorship on TV and Radio but god forbid they apply it to the internet.
This is so ridiculous that someone can deem what’s Canadian or not Canadian enough. It’s completely subjective… I can’t believe this was even proposed.
@Kenny Omega's DorsaI Cavity you v💉
@Kenny Omega's DorsaI Cavity Wrong tyrant! You nor government should NOT decide what is so called "Canadian. Roads and schools are Anot the same as stuff we watch onli e on your own devices that should be our choice alone and not government to decide. They do NOT know what is best for us. We don't even know or have a clear definition of "canadian" that likely as liberal government and senators have done will be pro-liberal, woke and cotnetn by minority of canadian population and not the people and yt race that represent the majority of canada.
It went thru lmfao, Canada is going down the drain.
I know right? It straight up sounds like something from a south park episode
So c-11 has been passed to the dismay of most average Canadians. The "public", aka Bell and Rogers, have spoken for us all on the matter.
When a country's economy is not flourishing, when the cost of living is at record highs, Canadian art and entertainment content diminishes considerably. What's the point of increasing optics for Canadian art and entertainment when artist are too busy trying desperately to survive and are unable to produce arts and entertainment?
You should be judged by the merit of your work not have the government put its finger on the scale. Linus Tech Tips is perhaps one of the most influential content providers on UA-cam because of the merit of his work. Forcing content providers to go through bureaucratic nonsense to prove their "Canadianess" is essentially a Monty Python skit that content providers will have to endure. It's unnecessary and ultimately will push Canadian providers who fail to jump though those hoops down the prioritized provider list. This is a law in search of a problem rather than a problem in search of a legal solution.
Would a VPN help with this?
I hate the thoight that the government would control the media we consume as Canadians.
Yes
Yes a vpn would bypass c11, unless they change c11 to apply to vpn service providers
@@HoagMurkula or Google accounts registered in Canada.. if logged into Google they still are able to figure out your geo location based on other inputs
@@HoagMurkula only to VPN services that based in Canada. Services like ExpressVPN, NordVPN, ProtonVPN, etc are international.
@@HoagMurkula turdeau has a death wish
It passed the house with the support of the ndp, bloc, majority of the green party and the liberals. Sad day for canadian internet users and content makers. Today is the start of the not free internet
Where the crtc gets to decide what we see, and what gets made.
You mean WEF which is over half of Trudeaus cabinet
this will kill some of my favorite youtubers..
Same
How?
They must be shitty youtubers then.
@@JoElMa22 any content not considered "canadian" enough by liberal governmnet while be deprioritized and unpromoted and censored from its recommendation and algoritms. It says so in the bill which you should read and not believe liberal lies.
Listen the best Canadian artists comics and musicians make it big in USA anyway. I have always been so proud of them but if I want to see content from other countries that is my right. JJ is right this bill is a solution looking for a problem. JJ also referred to ideology which is what it is really about I.e. giving government the levers to direct the narrative and suppress so called “disinformation “ aka conservative thought.
The first Canadian I’ve ever heard to truly pronounce about as “aboot”.
I try to convince my American friends that we typically pronounce it as “aboat”….but now this guy ruined all my hard work.
I heard something about the bill only showing Canadian UA-cams on UA-cam. And blocking you from watching non-Canadian UA-camrs. Can I have clearance on that and wether if its true or not?
not limited to only Canadian you tubers but when you search for something it'll try recommending only Canadian stuff to you. You'd have to search harder for non Canadian content. As opposed to getting the best video out there. It reminds me of how china said no UA-cam no google, you have to use the china versions. but a baby step version
@@jagsosa4414 thank you
Been noticing this the day the bill passed. It's rather frustrating and interesting at the same time...I keep finding small Canadian content creators both on UA-cam searches and on my fyp TikToks
It is for more then just UA-cam and it is censorship
@@jagsosa4414 not just Canadian content, it's what the CRTC deems as Canadian content. The CRTC can and has been used as a tool of censorship by not permitting certain programming due to it not being "Canadian enough" by arbitrary standards.
What will prevent other country to do the same and block Canadian content
I've lived in Canada for 37 years and I've never heard anyone without a thick maritime accent say 'aboot' that hard. It sounds forced.
I was thinking the same lol
idealized and politicized objectives, JJ hit the nail on the head there. That's primarily the REAL reason.
Do they control what pops up in your search as well, or just the recommendations I wonder….
Sounds like we need another trucker movement.
Awesome This is VANCOLOUR / Chek Media to have invited a few youtubers i watch including DownieLive, Uytae Lee and now JJ!
Hmm what is an internet version of blocking the streets
I’d like to agree with the elevator pitch portion of the video in that content consumers deserve to have control over the content viewing experience… which we do not have. I love political and cultural content, and I’d love to see more Canadian content but somehow I get american political content shoehorned into my feed. The notion that algorithms are working in anyone’s favour but UA-cam’s is ridiculous to me, and that is exactly why I believe some intervention is warranted. Not that I agree with all the stipulations of C11 but I don’t agree with the hysterical backlash it gets either.
He summarizes the problematic at 6:55
BTW this bill already passed so yay.
More like NAY and shameful by govt dictstors to decide what we watch is "canadian" or not and same thing for canadian creators to be censored by govt with content that they are against. A sad day for canadian freedom like free speech to censor disagreeing opinion such as conservstive thought or content we enjoy that will be removed nd replace for garbage content made by government that we hate and dont want to watch.
WELCOME TO CANUCKISTAN
Il still watch other content and van canadien content if I have too
Vancouver is the furthest left province both geographically & politically. That’s why it’s a dump.
Sic semper tyrannis
Stop complaining and tell us what we creators can do to counter it ? VPN ? Travel around places temporarily ?
Why the f*** does he say about like that I'm from Alberta I don't say a boot I say about
I would say the Bill would help Canadians making any sort of content, not particularly content related to Canada, to get financial help from Canada. Like songs by BNL, Anne Murray, Sarah McLachlan, and so forth, are they really singing Canadian culture? Or are their songs keep getting airtime on Canadian radios simply because the songs were made by Canadians, which benefitted those traditional content creators. Otherwise all radios and TVs would be just American music and TV.
And wouldn't those UA-camrs who are Canadians get more ad views and therefore more money from advertisers in Canada? Isn't that great for a Canadian who just starts out making content?
It is censorship
@@alaska3300 "Skip Ad" is censorship. Think about it.
@@aztaska The government deciding what you can and cannot see is censorship. It's #1 goal is the children, parents are struggling to put food on the table because we're taxed to death and have to work more, so the kids get their iPad and see only LGBT and BLM shit! They want to shutdown dissent, and ultimately control what you see! Leftists talk about inclusivity and tolerance, but only from their power hungry, virtue signalling point of view. They can't stand that their are people out their like myself who still hold traditional values and beliefs. They hate it! We already have the CBC, CTV, Global, etc, brainwashing the masses, and now enter bill C-11.
Dude I wanna watch content because it’s good content. I don’t care where it was made. Also making content on UA-cam is different then traditional tv media, all you need is a $40 phone to record and post content. Who the hell needs finance aid to create content when all u need is a $40 phone. This bill is ONLY benefiting large legacy media company’s.
the problem is it would push bad content artificially higher. people wont watch something that is bad and that will refelct in statistics. like saying no one bought a product that was designed for winter when it was only shown to people in hot climates.
it causes a chain reaction that results in hard to find good content for the user and less revenue for the creator.
it 's to stop us watching porn !
How do you pay your taxes ..blogger boy?
There was this hilarious moment on LTT where Linus was saying "It's basically a money-grab" until one of his writers came up and said "I got my start through a program funded by the CRTC"... and yeah, that is exactly the point, no one realizes what it does until it directly affects them or something they do. Some may not want it but there are many that owe their livelihoods to the additional funding for programs, tv/filmmaking, education ect... CRTC is not some boogeyman out to censor things... people are absolute BS alarmists in that regard.
Closed video after 5:27. We don't need your fake/exaggerated abootit. I've never heard a Canadian say this outside of a joke.
Sounds like an over reaction to change. You haven't convinced me one way or the other.
This bill will not fundamentally change our online experiences.... if anything, it will improve access for content creators to other Canadians by prioritizing it over foreign content...
We’ll see. Your PM is an egomaniac, so I can see this getting weird.
You mean Liberal Government propaganda...
@@StevieSosa that's just the slander of the opposition talking...
@@77feyonx simp
@@77feyonx No, it's a fact that the whole world sees.
I am about too bust
Sooooooooooooooooo
We didn't care if they controlled TV or the Radio but god forbid they start to regulate internet content which is essentially taking over through streaming tv shows?
Sorry but if there is an issue with this then shouldn't the issue have been with them controlling Radio and TV before this was even mentioned?
Makes you wonder why wasn't this guy really lobbying before? Oh because it didn't personally affect his $$$$$$$$$$$$$$.
That being said I am entirely against censorship but I am also against idiocy and when I see people like this I can't stand them.
Sorry but all credibility is lost when you essentially say you have been fine with the censorship on TV and Radio but god forbid they apply it to the internet.