3:22 How cool is that, 4 ad-libs in different times but almost the same. First comes Oslo right at the start of the Ankle Breaker, then comes Bucharest, then Munich and Buenos Aires ends it with a slight variation. I love it, really love it
only if amateurs were here Cologne (start only) Berlin Madrid Barcelona Oviedo Toulouse Bremen super short short moonwalk snippet Monza Rome (not sure if theres a sinnpet)
Vocals suck in bucharest, cologne and munich has better vocals. He's also more exhausted, copenhagen has crazy energy. For 1992 my favorite is oslo and copenhagen and 1993 is santiago
imma rank these performances real quick: 6. Bucharest, possibly the worst Billie Jean performance from this tour and in general competes with some late 1997 performances as the worst Billie Jean performance. 4/10 5. Bremen, I like the vocals, boring choreography, awesome freestyle. 6/10 4. Buenos Aires, these vocals are badass, especially the ad libs, and the dancing is everything Bucharest aimed to be and failed hard. 7/10 3. Copenhagen, mad energy, great moonwalks, tired vocals thought the ad libs are great. 8/10 2. Munich, MJ's extremely precise here, and his vocals are absolutely golden here. 8.5/10 1. Oslo, great energy, great dancing, great vocals, badass at times and and extremely smooth performance overall, though Stockholm is better. 9/10
@@M7keSonic Dangerous Era, where he was at his prime in terms of dance and without debate (Panther dance). Take a good look at 6:50 at the quality of his gesture compared to the others and I'm not even talking about the moonwalk. The dangerous era is too underrated he dances better than in bad.
@@Notion_concept I was like you when I first became an MJ fan, but after nearly 3 years of being an MJ and having the ability to watch every single Billie Jean performance available and having done that a couple months ago I can safely say: the HIStory Tour was MJ's peak. But anyway, back to the Bucharest argument, at 6:50 I can see that Bucharest is not as good as Munich, Oslo or Copenhagen at that section, the execution is decent at best. The moonwalk in Bucharest isn't that great when you have watched every single Billie Jean performance available, trust me, there are better. MJ is sick at Bucharest btw, no wonder he sounds pretty hoarse at times I do agree the Dangerous Tour is better than the Bad Tour, but the HIStory Tour wins both imo
3:22 How cool is that, 4 ad-libs in different times but almost the same. First comes Oslo right at the start of the Ankle Breaker, then comes Bucharest, then Munich and Buenos Aires ends it with a slight variation. I love it, really love it
Copenhagen also has a quiet and quick adlib
3:43
6:36 damn audio buggin lmao
0:00 idk why i love that beat👵
Nice Comparison next Wanna Be Starting Something history tour
Romania, Bucharest 1992 and Argentina Buenos Aires were the best, including the Moonwalks
😎♥️♥️ Michael Jackson the Best 😎♥️😎
Mil vezes o.melhor. O inigualável. A lenda
Love everyone of them.
Wao 👍 i love you Michael Jackson ♥️💖🥰🥰
Hola soy tu fan y la pregunta es a donde encontraste en munich 92 de billie jean
2:57 7:32 7:35
Rip me we all love you
Nice video 😎❤✌
only if amateurs were here
Cologne (start only)
Berlin
Madrid
Barcelona
Oviedo
Toulouse
Bremen super short short moonwalk snippet
Monza
Rome (not sure if theres a sinnpet)
Oye bro como encontraste esa versión de munich 92 de Billie Jean
Aowww every time😂😂
In my apinion Bucharest 1992 DVD is the best
True that
I think it's the worst
Bucharest, the best Billie Jean performance ever! Second comes Cologne and third Munich's !
Vocals suck in bucharest, cologne and munich has better vocals. He's also more exhausted, copenhagen has crazy energy. For 1992 my favorite is oslo and copenhagen and 1993 is santiago
And in which application did you mount this video?
imma rank these performances real quick:
6. Bucharest, possibly the worst Billie Jean performance from this tour and in general competes with some late 1997 performances as the worst Billie Jean performance. 4/10
5. Bremen, I like the vocals, boring choreography, awesome freestyle. 6/10
4. Buenos Aires, these vocals are badass, especially the ad libs, and the dancing is everything Bucharest aimed to be and failed hard. 7/10
3. Copenhagen, mad energy, great moonwalks, tired vocals thought the ad libs are great. 8/10
2. Munich, MJ's extremely precise here, and his vocals are absolutely golden here. 8.5/10
1. Oslo, great energy, great dancing, great vocals, badass at times and and extremely smooth performance overall, though Stockholm is better. 9/10
Hater of Bucharest Bucharest is the best performance here
@@Notion_concept how is Bucharest the best?
@@M7keSonic Dangerous Era, where he was at his prime in terms of dance and without debate (Panther dance). Take a good look at 6:50 at the quality of his gesture compared to the others and I'm not even talking about the moonwalk. The dangerous era is too underrated he dances better than in bad.
@@M7keSonic The beginning of Bucharest is also more original and different from the others 0:45
@@Notion_concept I was like you when I first became an MJ fan, but after nearly 3 years of being an MJ and having the ability to watch every single Billie Jean performance available and having done that a couple months ago I can safely say: the HIStory Tour was MJ's peak.
But anyway, back to the Bucharest argument, at 6:50 I can see that Bucharest is not as good as Munich, Oslo or Copenhagen at that section, the execution is decent at best. The moonwalk in Bucharest isn't that great when you have watched every single Billie Jean performance available, trust me, there are better. MJ is sick at Bucharest btw, no wonder he sounds pretty hoarse at times
I do agree the Dangerous Tour is better than the Bad Tour, but the HIStory Tour wins both imo