@@chrismayer3919 Because of Renault, Dacia has come to this way, today. Almost everything is came from the French brand like chassis, engine, gearbox and some other parts too. Only design is different between them.
These are marked down not because of their safety, but because they don't come with things like pedestrian avoidance, and auto emergency brake, and lane assist as standard. The cars themselves are safe, but not enough nanny state equipment, and I think that's wrong. I think the results should be how safe the actual car is in an accident, how likely you are to survive, not how little Timmy feels after he's crossed between two parked cars and got ploughed, because he was never taught not to be stupid, pisses me off.
This is BS. For example, on the crashing test, Dacia Sandero got 4 stars. If you are inside, you are pretty safe. The car got in the end 2 stars because it doesn't detect cyclists and pedestrians and it doesn't have lane assist. The Euro NCAP standards are higher now and they don't involve only the security of the passengers.
Why car manufacturers are even allowed to sell these cars? Imagine how many lives could be saved with higher requirements from the car structure (type of steel, absorption of force, etc.)
Good question. Chinese cars are probably safer and cheaper, but they get all sorts of negative marketing unlike the EU made cars that are garbage but do not get the negative marketing.
they sell cars like that so they can build better cars (better materials better safety etc) without those cars we would not have new safe cars, sad truth.
Euro NCAP and IIHS are not government bodies. These vehicles do meet government standards for safety, but obviously those are minimal. Keep in mind that even the cars that do badly on these tests are much safer than any car that’s probably more than a decade old.
Do some research, structurally most low star cars are fine, it's the lack of useless driver aids that ruin scores. Eg base model car, no driver aids 2 stars. Top spec model, alarm warning you stay in a lane, let's give this puppy 5 stars. Ncap logic...
These crash tests become less credible as they evolve. The obstacles are provided to avoid the reinforcements that the manufacturers provide. As this impactor element in the shape of a half 8 to avoid hitting the mediant pillar of the vehicle, or this non-deformable structure which hits the vehicle in the very lower part. Segment A cars and low cost cars are all more dangerous than others. That's not a scoop. You are not equal based on your income. My advice: Don't drink, don't use a smartphone while driving, wear your seat belt, don't drive without a license and respect the driving code. Or ... Don't use a car. And if you stay at home, watch out for earthquakes and falling trees.
TBH, these cars might have a poor NCAP rating but I can't help but be impressed at just how robust these low-end cars are. Compared to the deathtraps I learnt to drive in in the 1970s, these cars are rock solid!
I tend to agree. No noticeable cabin cell deformation like just a few years ago. So the basic construction seems quite solid. Some of the side impacts however worries me somewhat.
The electronic assistant systems only value a 1/4 into the final result of a NCAP Crash test. German here, working for ADAC. And visual results can be deceiving. It is the impact absorption that counts, (which sensors record) Most damage is done by missing absorption. Also, these are the Latin American Versions. The built-quality tends to be worse in 2nd/3rd world countries. I. E. Compare a Suzuki Vitara (Brezza or Maruti from India) against a Vitara Maygar (Hungary) from Europe. Same goes with a Swift. Renault is also building safer cars in Europe, but bad ones in other countries. Non the less, Dacia (Renault in Latin America) isnt safe in any country no matter the year of testing.
Most of them don’t even look that bad. I’m sure there’s more to it than just looks of course, but it just goes to show how good cars have gotten at safety.
This may be a bit misleading. Euro-NCAP rating also includes stuff like "is there a warning light if you do not use the seatbelt?" Another example are missing "Isofix" child seat attachment points. If there are none - or even if they are there but not easy to find - the car will get less points. AFAIK you can get e.g. max 4 stars if one of these features are missing. Thus the crash safety may be still decent but minor issues may give a poor rating.
Everything is relative, these look very good compared to when crash testing really took off around the turn of the millennium, have a look at the Fiat Seicento crash tests if you really want to scare yourself. Active safety is a huge thing now too in terms of making sure you are going more slowly at the point of impact, even if you don't see it coming, your car will.
The Seicento was about before the crash test boom, as was the Cinq and Rover 100, they were bad in a crash, and not safe, but what about previous 5 star cars that are getting marked down, not because they are physically unsafe to be in, but because they didn't come with driver aids as standard? I know technology is ever evolving, but marking an actual cars safety cell as a death trap, because an option isn't ticked as standard boils my piss a bit.
@@fuzzy-daddy83 I agree. Renegade, was 5* on initial test. Gets three now because it doesn’t come standard with every single safety interference. The Ypsilon got one star!
Sometimes it's not your fault. Driver in the oncoming lane falls asleep and crosses the center line. Or a deer crossing the road and you crash into a tree trying to evade etc. Your own behaviour is very important but not in all cases.
I didn't see any unsafe car for the passengers. NCAP standards and adac standards are getting higher and higher. Renault laguna use to have 5 stars. Today it would have 0 stars.
On constate que le système de notations est mal conçu ! La zoe est tres sure pourtant elle ne decroche rien , je prefere un accident en zoe plutôt qu'avec un range rover dans un virage ..
a vehicle's build & structural integrity should be a primary deciding factor in a crash test . . . safety measures like ABS EBD & airbags are only half the job done . . . the amount of ultra high strength steel used in a vehicle should be increased to a regulated 35% - 40% . . .
@@keaujibaha2594 lol no they have not. VW were some of the biggest bullshitters when it came to safety in the late 90s to early 00s. Even before that VW pretended to care about safety when in fact they did not. It was only after all the NCAPs started that VW started to get series about safety unlike say Renault or Volvo who were already both very serious about the safety of there cars and were building the safest cars even back then.
В России любят Duster, Logan, Honda вот эту)) Печально, конечно. Лучше купить старого немца, который возможно не заведется, чем машину в кредит, которая тебя угробит.
The test for HRV in this video is made by IIHS, not Euroncap. For side crash test, IIHS use a cart that has around 3 tons, basically double than the cart form Euroncap wich has around 1.4 tons
I think all cars are like this . There was an accident involving a rolls royce phantom and a honda jazz the phantom burst into flames killing all ita occupants the honda suffered no injury nor very very serious damage
@@peaceonearth8693 and yet, perversely, in many states (and all of Canada where I now live), there are ZERO roadworthiness tests. In the UK, with very few exceptions, once a car reaches 36 months old, it must, by law, be comprehensively tested every 12 months thereafter by a certified, standardized, approved testing centre who will check all relevant safety systems including brake performance and wear, lightbulb operation and beam pattern, suspension condition and wear, exhaust emissions, seatbelt wear and operation, etc. Here in Canada, unless your car is showing blatantly visible signs of unroadworthiness (which, let’s face it, at 80kph with the overworked, underpaid police officer travelling in the opposite direction to get his lunch, are just about impossible to spot) your car can join the many thousands of other worn out shitheaps I see every day. From illegal brake light modifications, uncovered LED light bars, tyres protruding out beyond the bodywork, leaking exhaust systems, worn brake pedal rubbers, worn seatbelts, dazzling headlight pattern from the numerous front end impacts over the years, cracked windshields, worn tyres, rusty brake lines, cracked suspension bushes on these ancient beaters I see all the time, the neglected maintenance is shocking. The crazy prices of the second hand car market and the price and unavailability of new cars means that people hang on to their old 1980s golfs and Volvos long after the UK (and most of Europe) would have consigned them to the scrap heap or forced the owner to keep up with the basic maintenance items above. I have viewed used cars from just 5 years ago here that are riddled with issues that the current owners happily claim to have ignored because the repairs would be too expensive and there’s no real need to worry about broken fog lights, intermittent failure of windscreen washer jets, split wiper blades, tyres with barely any tread left, etc. There are plenty of shitboxes in the UK for sure, but at least you know that, with a new MOT before you buy, the major points have been addressed and there has been no period of more than 12 months in its life when the car wasn’t considered safe to be on the roads (except in unusual circumstances if the car has been withdrawn from the roads - which will clearly be on record). So I’d take a brand new Dacia over being surrounded by clapped-out bangers like I see every day. If you can’t afford to keep your car and other road users safe, you shouldn’t be driving.
@@stefanvalentin9157 it’s not that people want cheap car, the problem is that most people can’t afford expensive cars! Do you even know how much new car costs?
I'd add almost the entirety of Suzuki's indian line up. alto , espresso , swift dzire , wagon R , ciaz , celerio , ertiga , ignis , XL6 , fronx etc. Would rather have a crash in a 20 year old merc or volvo then any of those.
My uncle has an old civic, and when I was with him, he was like oh i dont have a bonnet really (it was smallish), but the dacia spring really said i dont have a bonnet same with the Suzuki swift
North americans doesn't use to buy the european and asiatcs shit, just the very weel made, and still, it remains under severe criticism for any suspicion of poor quality or lack of safety
The reason you don’t see these in USA isn’t just because they might be less safe than a lot of USA vehicles. It’s instead mostly because consumers in the USA vs Europe have different needs and wants, and different regulations. In general European vehicles are smaller and lighter (and sometimes cheaper) and that makes it harder to engineer them to be safe.
@@SmilodonHuntingDeer Tiago,a small car weighs almost 1000kgs.And I don't want a Maruti Tin Can even it has 11 Airbags! When structural rigidity is compromised, what's the use of Airbags? And you must tell me why Maruti refuses to send it's cars for testing by GNCAP????
@@wolffury5019 Don't talk about cars Tested in Global NCAP in a Euro NCAP Video. Tiago will Patheticly Fail in Side Impact, Side Pole, Small Overlap and Pedestrian Tests. Or maybe even Whisplash.
Dacia belongs to Renault, Dusters are badged Dacia in Europe , Renault in the rest of the world. Note that Dusters use different platforms in different countries.
Why have a Dacia, when if you spend a few thousand pounds more, you can buy a Renault. As Dacia are essentially knock off cheap versions of Renault cars...... without the extra bits..... including, er...the safety. Ahem.
I would like to see the same price range for vw seat Skoda peugeot fiat were are they? Just recently a range rover killed a well known person from our musical industry do I need to say more?
Did you notice that all those Death Traps have Coffin Black interior colors… hmm just like every other automobile on the road today. Death Black or Depressing Grey colors from 1990. 🤮💀💀💩👺☠️☹️🤬😫😩😢😭😩😡
I disagree, Honda HRV and Mitsubishi Eclipse performed well, but I agree with the terrible results of Dacia lineup, mainly Duster, it are cheap, bad engineering and fatal traps
The entire Dacia model range made it here 💀
💀
Is Dacia and Renault one and the same?
@@chrismayer3919 Yes
I've never heard of them until now, now I know why 💀
@@chrismayer3919 Because of Renault, Dacia has come to this way, today. Almost everything is came from the French brand like chassis, engine, gearbox and some other parts too. Only design is different between them.
5:44 At least three rim didn’t fall off like the Renault/Dacia
Bro really 💀
These are marked down not because of their safety, but because they don't come with things like pedestrian avoidance, and auto emergency brake, and lane assist as standard. The cars themselves are safe, but not enough nanny state equipment, and I think that's wrong. I think the results should be how safe the actual car is in an accident, how likely you are to survive, not how little Timmy feels after he's crossed between two parked cars and got ploughed, because he was never taught not to be stupid, pisses me off.
This is BS. For example, on the crashing test, Dacia Sandero got 4 stars. If you are inside, you are pretty safe. The car got in the end 2 stars because it doesn't detect cyclists and pedestrians and it doesn't have lane assist. The Euro NCAP standards are higher now and they don't involve only the security of the passengers.
Wonder if James May still wants a Dacia...
Seeing honda's name is extremely surprising
Why car manufacturers are even allowed to sell these cars? Imagine how many lives could be saved with higher requirements from the car structure (type of steel, absorption of force, etc.)
Good question. Chinese cars are probably safer and cheaper, but they get all sorts of negative marketing unlike the EU made cars that are garbage but do not get the negative marketing.
they sell cars like that so they can build better cars (better materials better safety etc) without those cars we would not have new safe cars, sad truth.
Euro NCAP and IIHS are not government bodies. These vehicles do meet government standards for safety, but obviously those are minimal. Keep in mind that even the cars that do badly on these tests are much safer than any car that’s probably more than a decade old.
Do some research, structurally most low star cars are fine, it's the lack of useless driver aids that ruin scores. Eg base model car, no driver aids 2 stars. Top spec model, alarm warning you stay in a lane, let's give this puppy 5 stars. Ncap logic...
Because the criminal is the former president. Carlos Ghosn only thinks of his own interests
Краше тест проводить надо на 120 км /ч
After watching this would you dare set foot in a dacia
These crash tests become less credible as they evolve. The obstacles are provided to avoid the reinforcements that the manufacturers provide. As this impactor element in the shape of a half 8 to avoid hitting the mediant pillar of the vehicle, or this non-deformable structure which hits the vehicle in the very lower part. Segment A cars and low cost cars are all more dangerous than others. That's not a scoop. You are not equal based on your income. My advice: Don't drink, don't use a smartphone while driving, wear your seat belt, don't drive without a license and respect the driving code. Or ... Don't use a car. And if you stay at home, watch out for earthquakes and falling trees.
A fiat panda vould perform better than the dacia spring
No way!
The Fiat Panda is an old design and a death trap compared to a Spring.
Its a brom of Tha honda HR V
cars are not made for crashing...train is the safest travel ever... cars notso safe... if everybody could go by bus or train all would be safer...
Luckily i dont live in asia, south america, or Roemania XD lol jk
I dare to see a Suzuki swift with a baby on board sticker
FR!!!
TBH, these cars might have a poor NCAP rating but I can't help but be impressed at just how robust these low-end cars are. Compared to the deathtraps I learnt to drive in in the 1970s, these cars are rock solid!
Rock solid is the problem
There not supposed to be
The Dacia are safe. The reason for lower ratings is that they don't have the High tech electronic aids. Radar breaking Pre collision detection etc.
I tend to agree. No noticeable cabin cell deformation like just a few years ago. So the basic construction seems quite solid. Some of the side impacts however worries me somewhat.
exactly. but 98% of people don t know this...sadly
The electronic assistant systems only value a 1/4 into the final result of a NCAP Crash test. German here, working for ADAC. And visual results can be deceiving. It is the impact absorption that counts, (which sensors record) Most damage is done by missing absorption.
Also, these are the Latin American Versions. The built-quality tends to be worse in 2nd/3rd world countries. I. E. Compare a Suzuki Vitara (Brezza or Maruti from India) against
a Vitara Maygar (Hungary) from Europe. Same goes with a Swift.
Renault is also building safer cars in Europe, but bad ones in other countries.
Non the less, Dacia (Renault in Latin America) isnt safe in any country no matter the year of testing.
Only the sandero stepway is kinda safe with the 70% occupant safety rating, the others are actually dangerous
Most of them don’t even look that bad. I’m sure there’s more to it than just looks of course, but it just goes to show how good cars have gotten at safety.
Its funny because all of these 0-star cars by todays standards would have been 4 or 5-star cars 20 year ago.
Try 8 years ago. Every four years 5 stars becomes the minimum for 3 stars when they update the scoring.
This may be a bit misleading. Euro-NCAP rating also includes stuff like "is there a warning light if you do not use the seatbelt?" Another example are missing "Isofix" child seat attachment points. If there are none - or even if they are there but not easy to find - the car will get less points.
AFAIK you can get e.g. max 4 stars if one of these features are missing.
Thus the crash safety may be still decent but minor issues may give a poor rating.
Caraca, a Dacia/Renault está de PARABÉNS. Pqp! E esse Kwid vende pra cacete.
Everything is relative, these look very good compared to when crash testing really took off around the turn of the millennium, have a look at the Fiat Seicento crash tests if you really want to scare yourself. Active safety is a huge thing now too in terms of making sure you are going more slowly at the point of impact, even if you don't see it coming, your car will.
The Rover 100 is even worse. Disintegrates
The Seicento was about before the crash test boom, as was the Cinq and Rover 100, they were bad in a crash, and not safe, but what about previous 5 star cars that are getting marked down, not because they are physically unsafe to be in, but because they didn't come with driver aids as standard? I know technology is ever evolving, but marking an actual cars safety cell as a death trap, because an option isn't ticked as standard boils my piss a bit.
@@fuzzy-daddy83 I agree. Renegade, was 5* on initial test. Gets three now because it doesn’t come standard with every single safety interference.
The Ypsilon got one star!
@@angrymuffinsbthe holden commodore!!! Is the worst
All cars are the same when you drive save at normal speed and without alcohol and drugs! Then you get no accident. I do it for 35 years now! 😊
Sometimes it's not your fault. Driver in the oncoming lane falls asleep and crosses the center line. Or a deer crossing the road and you crash into a tree trying to evade etc. Your own behaviour is very important but not in all cases.
I didn't see any unsafe car for the passengers. NCAP standards and adac standards are getting higher and higher. Renault laguna use to have 5 stars. Today it would have 0 stars.
On constate que le système de notations est mal conçu ! La zoe est tres sure pourtant elle ne decroche rien , je prefere un accident en zoe plutôt qu'avec un range rover dans un virage ..
how does the Zoe pass safety regulations?
a vehicle's build & structural integrity should be a primary deciding factor in a crash test . . . safety measures like ABS EBD & airbags are only half the job done . . . the amount of ultra high strength steel used in a vehicle should be increased to a regulated 35% - 40% . . .
just need to put rollbars like sport car ( hidden behind plastic ) , race drivers don't die during crash nowadays
This is why I only drive VW they’ve always been using high strength steel
But they're wearing helmets and harnesses.@@stephen10.
@@keaujibaha2594 lol no they have not. VW were some of the biggest bullshitters when it came to safety in the late 90s to early 00s. Even before that VW pretended to care about safety when in fact they did not. It was only after all the NCAPs started that VW started to get series about safety unlike say Renault or Volvo who were already both very serious about the safety of there cars and were building the safest cars even back then.
Least safe don't mean not safe
В России любят Duster, Logan, Honda вот эту))
Печально, конечно. Лучше купить старого немца, который возможно не заведется, чем машину в кредит, которая тебя угробит.
0:13 you can see the driver head is out
4:02 why did that make me laugh 😂 the way the car hit the pole 💀
8:13 Arm Ripped 💀
i know the hrv received a poor rating in iihs side but why was it given a 5 star by euro ncap 2015?
The test for HRV in this video is made by IIHS, not Euroncap. For side crash test, IIHS use a cart that has around 3 tons, basically double than the cart form Euroncap wich has around 1.4 tons
IIHS uses a heavier "vehicle" to simulate the fact that big trucks are common in the USA
always better a new car, even if Dacia. Results are not so bad. If you can buy mb, BMW, audi lucky you. Ps. I m a Mazda owner
I think all cars are like this . There was an accident involving a rolls royce phantom and a honda jazz the phantom burst into flames killing all ita occupants the honda suffered no injury nor very very serious damage
CRV looked like a marginal/acceptable tbh, though ig you could say that when in reality the sensors say something completely different
5th car is Indias one of the top selling car
bro the rims on the dacia looks like they are just a piece of plastic
All European models mostly non will make it to USA an European higher crach safety standards
How do most of these cars have front airbags, but don't have side airbags?
Ah, that's why Dacias are cheap, criminal really that Renault couldn't be bothered.
If the cars are this bad, how are they able to be sold?
the standards are incredibly high now
@@peaceonearth8693 and yet, perversely, in many states (and all of Canada where I now live), there are ZERO roadworthiness tests. In the UK, with very few exceptions, once a car reaches 36 months old, it must, by law, be comprehensively tested every 12 months thereafter by a certified, standardized, approved testing centre who will check all relevant safety systems including brake performance and wear, lightbulb operation and beam pattern, suspension condition and wear, exhaust emissions, seatbelt wear and operation, etc.
Here in Canada, unless your car is showing blatantly visible signs of unroadworthiness (which, let’s face it, at 80kph with the overworked, underpaid police officer travelling in the opposite direction to get his lunch, are just about impossible to spot) your car can join the many thousands of other worn out shitheaps I see every day. From illegal brake light modifications, uncovered LED light bars, tyres protruding out beyond the bodywork, leaking exhaust systems, worn brake pedal rubbers, worn seatbelts, dazzling headlight pattern from the numerous front end impacts over the years, cracked windshields, worn tyres, rusty brake lines, cracked suspension bushes on these ancient beaters I see all the time, the neglected maintenance is shocking.
The crazy prices of the second hand car market and the price and unavailability of new cars means that people hang on to their old 1980s golfs and Volvos long after the UK (and most of Europe) would have consigned them to the scrap heap or forced the owner to keep up with the basic maintenance items above.
I have viewed used cars from just 5 years ago here that are riddled with issues that the current owners happily claim to have ignored because the repairs would be too expensive and there’s no real need to worry about broken fog lights, intermittent failure of windscreen washer jets, split wiper blades, tyres with barely any tread left, etc.
There are plenty of shitboxes in the UK for sure, but at least you know that, with a new MOT before you buy, the major points have been addressed and there has been no period of more than 12 months in its life when the car wasn’t considered safe to be on the roads (except in unusual circumstances if the car has been withdrawn from the roads - which will clearly be on record).
So I’d take a brand new Dacia over being surrounded by clapped-out bangers like I see every day. If you can’t afford to keep your car and other road users safe, you shouldn’t be driving.
They are very cheap, that’s why. Most people want cheap cars, they don’t care how safe the car really is
@@williambone for good reason as well
@@stefanvalentin9157 it’s not that people want cheap car, the problem is that most people can’t afford expensive cars! Do you even know how much new car costs?
How do these junkers get past the requirements for side air bags?
I'd add almost the entirety of Suzuki's indian line up. alto , espresso , swift dzire , wagon R , ciaz , celerio , ertiga , ignis , XL6 , fronx etc. Would rather have a crash in a 20 year old merc or volvo then any of those.
Renault losing ground(
My uncle has an old civic, and when I was with him, he was like oh i dont have a bonnet really (it was smallish), but the dacia spring really said i dont have a bonnet same with the Suzuki swift
Poor 2 star rating
Renault😂😂😂 French Qualité 😂😂😂 🤮🤮🤮🤮🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
You're probably safer on a bike than on a Dacia.
The Dacia has 4 stars on passager security. It got bad evaluated because It do not install sensors to detect cyclist or pedestrians
There's a reason why Dacia cars are so cheap - now you know. I always thought they were too good to be true.
I think they look as good as the others
no rating for swift......damn~
James May would be very upset over the Dacia's ratings lol
Seat Ibiza EuroNcap 5 yıldız 👍
The Zoe shocks me the previous one had side airbags and more safety tech than the new one
dacia , per chi se ne intende ;-)
Dacia 💀💀💀 un petit accident tu rejoins johnny
Jte jure 😭
I bet my go-kart would nail this test, built that puppy myself.
Most of these are not sold in the U.S.............for a reason.
Thanks to effort made by NHTSA.
Na , dann erkläre mal den Grund , möchte das auch wissen !!
North americans doesn't use to buy the european and asiatcs shit, just the very weel made, and still, it remains under severe criticism for any suspicion of poor quality or lack of safety
Obscene import taxes to keep the US auto industry running is the reason.
The reason you don’t see these in USA isn’t just because they might be less safe than a lot of USA vehicles. It’s instead mostly because consumers in the USA vs Europe have different needs and wants, and different regulations. In general European vehicles are smaller and lighter (and sometimes cheaper) and that makes it harder to engineer them to be safe.
Because brands whit poor calcification don’t care, they still selling but l wish they sell less units
Search for euro ncap results and you will be surprised
We need the safety of our fam not mileage and looks nice ?
Wow that was fail
1:26 Unreasonable speed and fun fact the tire saved the driver
Wonderful video
Wonderful video
Most of these cars aren't available in Canada meh
🌺❤️❤️❤️❤️
I would take any of these over anything rover.
0:01 Bad news.
You say that Dacia is not good for crash test. Look at the windshield 1:30 , it 's not even broken in frontal crash .
It's not "him saying it" it's the crash test score it received. The state of the windshield means nothing when your dead.
Maybe if the French actually worked instead than riot and protest their cars wouldn’t be so bad.
Today I have booked a TATA Tiago in Red color with 4 srar GNCAP rating!😁😁😁
Technically a 0 Star rated car if Tested in Euro NCAP
the tiago has only 2 airbags it dosen t have 7 airbags like the suzuki s cross buy a car with 7 airbags
@@SmilodonHuntingDeer Tiago,a small car weighs almost 1000kgs.And I don't want a Maruti Tin Can even it has 11 Airbags!
When structural rigidity is compromised, what's the use of Airbags?
And you must tell me why Maruti refuses to send it's cars for testing by GNCAP????
@@wolffury5019 Don't talk about cars Tested in Global NCAP in a Euro NCAP Video. Tiago will Patheticly Fail in Side Impact, Side Pole, Small Overlap and Pedestrian Tests. Or maybe even Whisplash.
@@25StevyLovesDaddyTata All Tata cars will fail in pedestrian safety tests
God motow septy driver thes.
I thought a Duster was a Dacia. (Not Renault)
Dacia belongs to Renault, Dusters are badged Dacia in Europe , Renault in the rest of the world.
Note that Dusters use different platforms in different countries.
its like all latam cars
Renault is owned by a supervillain
That's why Renault doesn't care anymore of Dacia
Why have a Dacia, when if you spend a few thousand pounds more, you can buy a Renault. As Dacia are essentially knock off cheap versions of Renault cars...... without the extra bits..... including, er...the safety. Ahem.
Not even one german car
And...
@footballcoreano The safest car is Peugeot I love this ❤️❤️♥️♥️❤️❤️♥️♥️
@footballcoreano japanese cars are safe!!!
@clemathieu JT I was so dumb
What's with the music??
Oh no anyway
The side is bad maybe the roof is bad and like everything else but the front that was not that bad I don’t know what you’re talking about bad😂😂😂
You forgot fiat cars
😂 they even need to submit to the crash test something so obvious
And forgot to add the Chinese cars.
I would like to see the same price range for vw seat Skoda peugeot fiat were are they? Just recently a range rover killed a well known person from our musical industry do I need to say more?
Did you notice that all those Death Traps have Coffin Black interior colors… hmm just like every other automobile on the road today.
Death Black or Depressing Grey colors from 1990.
🤮💀💀💩👺☠️☹️🤬😫😩😢😭😩😡
I disagree, Honda HRV and Mitsubishi Eclipse performed well, but I agree with the terrible results of Dacia lineup, mainly Duster, it are cheap, bad engineering and fatal traps
Tests results disagree with you…