So when the youtube community lands on the moon (before anyone else) it will be on a mix of Apollo, Soyuz and Arduino based equipment. All sponsored by Keysight and Rage Shadow Legend.
@@i_care_because_you_do швейцарская фирма cornavin (сайт cornavin watches) в своих часах cornavin de luxe 23 камня использовала советские механизмы часов Полет. кстати на выставке советские Полеты брали приз как самые тонкие часы в мире, так-то
@@i_care_because_you_do так же читайте скандал с Franck Muller, который закупил 20 000 «Полётов» без маркировки и это было в 2005-м году, даже далеко уже не СССР. нагуглить легко информацию. И да, Швейцария всегда импортировала часовые механизмы из других стран и под брендом продавала втоидорога, это основной их бизнес
Just read Ken’s blog…..what an amazing combination of extremely talented, dedicated and tenacious folks Marc and his team are! The pool of talent that seamlessly meld into Marc’s technology challenges and the passion they share in each project and indeed their stage of the project is infectious. The amount of historically important technology that would otherwise not have be restored to its original working condition for prosperity is amazing. The skills and knowledge that currently exist with the passionate desire to locate, acquire and restore important historically rare equipment is truely remarkable. Equally so the way Marc pulls this all together and shares the experiences as though you are in the basement with him and the talented team of merry engineers.
Видел эту штуку в музее космонавтики в городе Байконур, когда служил там в армии в 1989 году. Там все было так устроено. Видел радиостанцию КВ диапазона на трех транзисторах с кварцевым калибратором на 1 кГц. Странная штука, но она работала.
I have been building a cosmetic replica of the globus for a film, and your videos with Ken have been a real help. Thank you for making something so informative and detailed about this obscure piece of space history!
If I asked Ken to reverse engineer a napkin, I’d get back x-rays of the fibers, measured drawings of all the dimensions, a pdf of the material it’s made out of, including chemical composition, and a 47 page document of use cases for it and a YT video on how to implement them. And he’d tell me it’s not quite done.
Merci de nous dévoiler ces trésors d'ingénierie. Et un grand merci à Master Ken et Eric et toute l'équipe que vous formez. (Marc traduira...?) Vous êtes super. Et ce que vous faites est super. Merci.
I think the Blue Light says "Please return your seat backs and tray tables to their fully upright and locked position for landing!". Thank you for another great video.
This has been a fascinating series. What an incredibly beautiful and intricate machine. It's interesting how Soviet technology was often different from that used by NASA... probably due to all the secrecy.
I have not seen parts 1 and 2. I love electro-mechanical devices - when I was 13 I created an e-m entry alarm for my room, from relays and a motor with a cam I created. Kudos to you guys, who have a truly superior and amazing ability to reverse engineer devices.
I am always amazed by Ken. Obviously an exceedingly brilliant engineer. There’s one thing I have observed about this device. I would hope once it’s in a panel and I guess you’re in a space suit, that you wouldn’t hear this loud clicking noise all the time on the mission. I think that would drive me nuts😊. Thanks again for another great video.
I don't understand the negative comments about Russian space hardware - not engineers obviously. It might have been less sophisticated but it worked and also represents the primary "ground control" Soviet thinking which was the same in the US for Mercury but evolved into a more spacecraft centric control model through Gemini, Apollo etc.. Soyuz has an incredible success rate also.
@@535phobos Possible. I might've stumbled upon a bad source. Some claim the overload during launch is 1-7g, other say 4g. The most reliable source i found after your reply is an official video of modern Soyuz launch with telemetry. It shows 4g at the end of stage 1. watch?v=UNlglX8IiFo However, that was about modern Soyuz. During the Gagarin's flight the 3rd stage shut down half a second too late and that gave the craft 22m/s extra velocity. That's 4.5g of acceleration when Soyuz only runs at 3g. So acceleration could've been higher at other points as well. Maybe not 7g though. Still, even 4g with vibrations is not insignificant.
@@vantuz8264 In the second world war anti aircraft shell were developed with valve proximity fused. Solid metal presents less of a challenge.... probably.
Whoooooooa, you got a real deal Soyuz control panel? Most impressive! May be crude compared to Apollo, but still a thing of beauty and a joy for ever. The Mercury instrument looks interesting too. Hope you'll be able to work on one at some point. Landing zone confirmed!
When it was designed, it was top notch mechanical computer prowess It servers as a mechanical backup to the main computer, so as long as it do it's job, there is no need to fix it either.
зЗабавно что такие концевики "микрики" были наверное дома у каждого кто хоть как-то интересовался электроникой или поделками электрическими. Получается что мой крестный батя в свои жигули замутил управление разбрызгивателями омывайки лобового стекла теми же самыми микро выключателями которые стояли в космическом корабле!) Это потрясающе) 😎
It took a long time for digital computers to get good enough to replace these. Early computers did not have much working memory and struggled with floating point calculations.
Buran made uncrewed spaceflight in 1988 on computer with next characteristics: 4 MHz processor, 128 KB RAM, 16 KB permanent program memory)) That is, the power of this computer was enough to fly into space and automatically land on an airfield without engines.
The Globus is a beautiful machine. It’s literally hardware, and pretty impervious to unexpected flaws. The main limitation is being locked into one immutable task. There is no chance for an elegant hack such as the one which saved the Apollo 14 LM descent by patching around sensing of the short circuited abort button. … not that a hack would likely be needed in the context of Globus’s operation.
And you’d be right! There was an American version of the Globus too used in Mercury! And it was a wind-up instrument! I think used for the few early or suborbital flights only, so it’s exceedingly rare. The Globus on the other hand was used from 1961 to 2002, so gobs of them have been produced.
Apparently the earlier. They used the clicking as a confirmation that the capsule had separated properly, as the separation triggered the start of the Globus. I suppose it must have been much quieter with the cover on and behind the thick control panel.
@@awatt I never thought about it before, but I had an office in the back of a computing equipment platform room and there was an annunciator and strobe for the Simplex fire alarm in there because the machine noise drowned out the unit in the hallway outside. The speaker emitted a constant sort of digital grinding sound with a faint sound of the fire tone in the background. I chalked it up to lax design, but perhaps that was intentional verification the thing was functional. It was irritating enough that I played a radio at low volume to cover it up. In a similar vein, a Vax 11/750, one of the machines I cared for, had a big red fault light on the front. The light was kept lit a little bit constantly to verify it wasn’t burned out. The only problem was that Digital’s idea of lit a little bit was still pretty bright and more than once I spooked myself glancing over and thinking the fault light might be on.
Damn boi were do you find all your stuf Your doing a great ting documenting all this stuf. Sad that all this information can't be shared when it's needed the most After a world wide blackout
I could switch that back and forth from landing to orbit, all day. I must be part rat though, that consistent clicking in the background makes me want to run away.
For people who criticizes this unit for its limitations: please notice that in russian it is called literally as "space navigation indicator". So the unit does NOT pretend to be any kind of advanced smart universal digital "computer".
If you don't have the landing angle from mission control perhaps you can guess one and switch back and forth between the two modes and see where you land and adjust to suit...
@@Viktor-g8 Спасибо. Телевизионное анимационное шоу Симпсонов (американское) представляло собой сатиру на старый советский мультфильм эпохи «железного занавеса» и использовало песню, звучащую как эта.
I'm curious how exactly this was used in flight. I imagine they would place the globus in landing mode and when the landing point gets to the desired landing zone, they would initiate the deorbit burn.
To expand on this a bit, mission control would send them the various landing opportunities for each day. They were sent the orbit number, the time for the burn, and the landing angle (ugol posadki), and it's this angle that they input into the instrument to use in landing mode. This angle would depend on the orbital altitude.
I find your (necessary) expertise in things electronic fascinating and unreachable (to me), insofar as the _black arts_ necessary to revive these old _doodly-do_ space-boxes. I note from the Soviet engineers a lack of sensitivity to considerations of human-machine interface. Can you imagine living in a spherical refrigerator for days, surrounded by slow but sure death, relying on a mechanism the cosmonaut cannot turn off, going _clack-clack-clack_ until s/he would want to breathe vacuum to end the duress, if the mission were long enough?
About the "old" instrument: in an documentation about russian space program and the sojuz they said (if I remember correctly) that the sojuz hasn't changed much over the years, because the russians are quite pragmatic. If it works, why change it and create new problems?
It is not the only reason, to be honest. The bureaucratic procedures to confirm that the new equipment was reliable enough to fly into space were very tedious (and largely meaningless). So, why do something if you can do nothing? But when it was necessary, they worked as hard as they could. A good example is the development of spacesuits for the Soyuz-Apollo mission
But this device only marginally "works". It's not a general navigation instrument. It's a map display that shows what should be happening if the craft is on the nominal flight path, limited to a circular unperturbed orbit at a single fixed inclination. It's sole degree of freedom is a minor correction for the altitude (orbital period). Even for that it requires two adjustments, with the second being the externally calculated angle of the landing point. "It's simpler and just as good" can sometimes be true, but often it's just a coping mechanism. This is a beautiful instrument and a wonderful piece of history, but it was a dead end. It wasn't going to get the soviets to the next level of space travel.
The markings on the ball make it seem that it is just a shop-purchased school globe - it indicates the year, the scale, even major shipping routs, which wouldn't be useful in space, but was marked in all geography textbooks back in the time. Am I correct to assume that Soviet and US borders are actually hand-pained with a red sharpie?
I see. Since the "Globus" ball has no hole in the pole, I'd say is is purpose-made, but delivered from a civil globe factory. Mercury Program Earth Path Indicator, on the other hand was indeed bought in a corner shop - it even has a hole in the pole, where the axis used to be!
Thank you for the interesting material and congratulations to both gentlemen for their inquisitiveness. By the way - have you thought about how the engineers at CCCP came up with it. I am writing from Poland and we have encountered various Soviet devices here many times - they were always built differently than those from Western Europe and the USA. It's a different philosophy and way of thinking. The devices work, but they are quite difficult to repair. Greetings to Russian engineers! Привет российским инженерам!
So when the youtube community lands on the moon (before anyone else) it will be on a mix of Apollo, Soyuz and Arduino based equipment. All sponsored by Keysight and Rage Shadow Legend.
PCB boards manufactured by JLCPCB and PCBWay
But they will not wear space suits - but fancy pants! 😁
Also PCBWAY, and vintage HP test equipment
You mean Raid? 🤣
Add relay & uniselector switching equipment and vintage display technologies! And blinkenlights.
I felt like a reasonably intelligent person until I found this channel.
Some of us didn't even feel that so imagine how we feel now.
@@snizami Hahhahahah. 😅
The Swiss should just launch an all mechanical space program to promote their watch industry!
And their main principal of neutrality and sovereignty. Something that russia is rather lacking these days.
The Clockwork Rocket!
@@i_care_because_you_do швейцарская фирма cornavin (сайт cornavin watches) в своих часах cornavin de luxe 23 камня использовала советские механизмы часов Полет. кстати на выставке советские Полеты брали приз как самые тонкие часы в мире, так-то
@@i_care_because_you_do так же читайте скандал с Franck Muller, который закупил 20 000 «Полётов» без маркировки и это было в 2005-м году, даже далеко уже не СССР. нагуглить легко информацию. И да, Швейцария всегда импортировала часовые механизмы из других стран и под брендом продавала втоидорога, это основной их бизнес
Japan proved that if you just want to get into a simple orbit, you don't even need active
В 80х присутствовал вовремя сборки таких приборов! Крутил и вертел ручки! 😮😢
7:43 raw joy from seeing a light go on. I love this guys.
Just read Ken’s blog…..what an amazing combination of extremely talented, dedicated and tenacious folks Marc and his team are! The pool of talent that seamlessly meld into Marc’s technology challenges and the passion they share in each project and indeed their stage of the project is infectious.
The amount of historically important technology that would otherwise not have be restored to its original working condition for prosperity is amazing. The skills and knowledge that currently exist with the passionate desire to locate, acquire and restore important historically rare equipment is truely remarkable.
Equally so the way Marc pulls this all together and shares the experiences as though you are in the basement with him and the talented team of merry engineers.
Thanks. I’m blushing!
Carl must be bored being out of the loop in Florida.
I wholeheartedly agree, TheFleetz. Everyone on that team is Top Shelf, no doubt about it!
We miss Carl, but he is having the time of his life restoring space equipment at the Cape Canaveral museum!
Agreed! I'd love to be in the basement to assist, even if it's just passing a screwdriver to Marc!
Видел эту штуку в музее космонавтики в городе Байконур, когда служил там в армии в 1989 году.
Там все было так устроено. Видел радиостанцию КВ диапазона на трех транзисторах с кварцевым калибратором на 1 кГц. Странная штука, но она работала.
На плате расположены три реле РЭС-10,транзистор П213 или П217 германиевый,также два диода д237.
Там транзистор П217. Я в детстве собирал схемы, использующие этот транзистор.
Congratulations Marc, Ken and the whole team on another successful restoration. We celebrate the engineers, and learn from them, thanks to you.
This is out of the world piece of instrumentation. This must be delivered to a museum!
I have been building a cosmetic replica of the globus for a film, and your videos with Ken have been a real help. Thank you for making something so informative and detailed about this obscure piece of space history!
If I asked Ken to reverse engineer a napkin, I’d get back x-rays of the fibers, measured drawings of all the dimensions, a pdf of the material it’s made out of, including chemical composition, and a 47 page document of use cases for it and a YT video on how to implement them.
And he’d tell me it’s not quite done.
I don't know what and how you did the job. The Globus mechanism is so beautiful. Thank you for the reverse engineering. Wonderful job Sir!
Merci de nous dévoiler ces trésors d'ingénierie. Et un grand merci à Master Ken et Eric et toute l'équipe que vous formez. (Marc traduira...?)
Vous êtes super. Et ce que vous faites est super. Merci.
I just wish I could 'like' this video more than once! Fabulous. Thank you Marc, Ken and colleagues!
The indicator states "МЕСТО ПОСАДКИ" in Latin alphabet would be "MESTO POSADKI" ~ place of touchdown.
MESTO POSADKI
@@jonasthemovie
Landing place.
МЕСТО НОСЯКИ!
@@volo870 МЕСТО ПОСАДКИ
@@TzOk Место насадки?
I think the Blue Light says "Please return your seat backs and tray tables to their fully upright and locked position for landing!". Thank you for another great video.
or "hold space to slow down"
After further research, it also says “no smoking” and “keep your arms and legs inside at all times”. Russian is such an efficient language.
@@CuriousMarc Does it also give an audible Ding when it illuminates, to cover the no smoking part? lol
This has been a fascinating series. What an incredibly beautiful and intricate machine. It's interesting how Soviet technology was often different from that used by NASA... probably due to all the secrecy.
A trilogy to surpass Star Wars 👌Wonderful work!
I have not seen parts 1 and 2. I love electro-mechanical devices - when I was 13 I created an e-m entry alarm for my room, from relays and a motor with a cam I created. Kudos to you guys, who have a truly superior and amazing ability to reverse engineer devices.
What a cool, tiny piece of history. Thanks for the restoration!
Incredible!!! The instrument and your ability to decipher it and give it life again!
Optimistic worldview. Thank you for both the video and that.
What an absolutely fantastic little machine. Thank you so much for sharing!
Wow. This looks so interesting from a watch collector point of view!
Great job figuring out how the Globus works and making it functional again. You guys are great. I'll have to swing by Ken's blog later.
A beautiful demonstration of an amazing instrument!
Thanks, I realy liked to get some of an understanding of it!
Ken and Marc..... you are the master engineers!
C'est tellement beau, merci pour vos vidéos passionnantes
Marc - Agreed - good engineering is good engineering and should be applauded for it's achievement.
This is "Landing point" lamp (or "Mesto posadki" on russian). "Fasten seatbelt" on russian seems like Пристегните ремни (Pristegnite remni).
I am always amazed by Ken. Obviously an exceedingly brilliant engineer. There’s one thing I have observed about this device. I would hope once it’s in a panel and I guess you’re in a space suit, that you wouldn’t hear this loud clicking noise all the time on the mission. I think that would drive me nuts😊. Thanks again for another great video.
What an amazing piece of work and history, thank you for sharing!
All right, it's working! Now let's build a rocket for it! 😊
As this rate, they will assemble a frankenstein Soyuz and an Apollo to go with it in the next 50 years or so lol
absolutely fantastic
I don't understand the negative comments about Russian space hardware - not engineers obviously. It might have been less sophisticated but it worked and also represents the primary "ground control" Soviet thinking which was the same in the US for Mercury but evolved into a more spacecraft centric control model through Gemini, Apollo etc.. Soyuz has an incredible success rate also.
Not bad considering there are only a few countries that did this at all.
What makes these devices even more amazing is the fact that they have to work after a few minutes of vibrations and 7g overload.
I dont think the Soyuz pulls 7g at any point. Maybe the landing, but at this point the computer isnt needed anymore.
@@535phobos Possible. I might've stumbled upon a bad source. Some claim the overload during launch is 1-7g, other say 4g.
The most reliable source i found after your reply is an official video of modern Soyuz launch with telemetry. It shows 4g at the end of stage 1.
watch?v=UNlglX8IiFo
However, that was about modern Soyuz. During the Gagarin's flight the 3rd stage shut down half a second too late and that gave the craft 22m/s extra velocity. That's 4.5g of acceleration when Soyuz only runs at 3g. So acceleration could've been higher at other points as well. Maybe not 7g though.
Still, even 4g with vibrations is not insignificant.
@@vantuz8264
In the second world war anti aircraft shell were developed with valve proximity fused. Solid metal presents less of a challenge.... probably.
I'm glad that this "Globus" hadn't worked so it gave a brilliant oppurtunity to open it and appreciate it's electromechanical beauty.
I am amazed with that thing!!!!
Whoooooooa, you got a real deal Soyuz control panel? Most impressive! May be crude compared to Apollo, but still a thing of beauty and a joy for ever.
The Mercury instrument looks interesting too. Hope you'll be able to work on one at some point.
Landing zone confirmed!
When it was designed, it was top notch mechanical computer prowess
It servers as a mechanical backup to the main computer, so as long as it do it's job, there is no need to fix it either.
Прекрасная работа! Интересно посмотреть живьем, это будет музей или частная коллекция?
That's a good question - I believe a private collection.
Great job in reverse engineering this storied piece of cosmonaut history.
This is the best channel on UA-cam! Thanks for sharing this!
Wow, you guys managed to fix it finally and make it work again! That is amazing! Congratulations on this momentous achievement.
nice that somebody can see something special old soviet relics..
Never ceases to amaze
Good on you Marc and Master Ken.
зЗабавно что такие концевики "микрики" были наверное дома у каждого кто хоть как-то интересовался электроникой или поделками электрическими. Получается что мой крестный батя в свои жигули замутил управление разбрызгивателями омывайки лобового стекла теми же самыми микро выключателями которые стояли в космическом корабле!) Это потрясающе) 😎
you have to add links to these videos in wikipedia's article
- AWESOME!!!
- Great job, team.
Master Ken, Fixes it again.... 👍👍👍
I need one of these for the dash in my Subaru, Way cooler than Google Maps.
This is an impressive piece of hardware.
Ken is the god of reverse engineering!
The force is strong with Master Ken
amazing work guys. And, in a sci-fi universe a species went into space with “The Clockwork Rocket” (Greg Egan) :-)
It took a long time for digital computers to get good enough to replace these. Early computers did not have much working memory and struggled with floating point calculations.
Buran made uncrewed spaceflight in 1988 on computer with next characteristics: 4 MHz processor, 128 KB RAM, 16 KB permanent program memory)) That is, the power of this computer was enough to fly into space and automatically land on an airfield without engines.
The Globus is a beautiful machine. It’s literally hardware, and pretty impervious to unexpected flaws. The main limitation is being locked into one immutable task. There is no chance for an elegant hack such as the one which saved the Apollo 14 LM descent by patching around sensing of the short circuited abort button. … not that a hack would likely be needed in the context of Globus’s operation.
Ken's last comment: "Maybe it says fasten seat belts? I'm no sure....?" 🤣😂
9:55 Was just thinking, I'm pretty sure at least 1 Mercury spacecraft had something similar to this gadget :D
Thanks for sharing this!
And you’d be right! There was an American version of the Globus too used in Mercury! And it was a wind-up instrument! I think used for the few early or suborbital flights only, so it’s exceedingly rare. The Globus on the other hand was used from 1961 to 2002, so gobs of them have been produced.
I’m trying to decide if that solenoid clanking would be reassuring in its constancy or it would quickly drive me crazy. The latter. 😊
Apparently the earlier. They used the clicking as a confirmation that the capsule had separated properly, as the separation triggered the start of the Globus. I suppose it must have been much quieter with the cover on and behind the thick control panel.
Some nuclear power plants broadcast a click similar to this to let everyone know that the intercom is working and that there are no alarms.
@@CuriousMarc Thank you Marc. And thank you for your work preserving engineering history.
@@awatt I never thought about it before, but I had an office in the back of a computing equipment platform room and there was an annunciator and strobe for the Simplex fire alarm in there because the machine noise drowned out the unit in the hallway outside. The speaker emitted a constant sort of digital grinding sound with a faint sound of the fire tone in the background. I chalked it up to lax design, but perhaps that was intentional verification the thing was functional. It was irritating enough that I played a radio at low volume to cover it up.
In a similar vein, a Vax 11/750, one of the machines I cared for, had a big red fault light on the front. The light was kept lit a little bit constantly to verify it wasn’t burned out. The only problem was that Digital’s idea of lit a little bit was still pretty bright and more than once I spooked myself glancing over and thinking the fault light might be on.
In hushed voices "... Tech Sargent Ken...."
Ken is such a beast
The Globus is ready to fly again!. Das Vedania!, with the Potato water and "Seatbelts!!".
The one thing I never knew I wanted to own.
Facinating…. 🤯
Let's celebrate achievements of humanity.
Master Ken consistently reminds me how much I wish I could apply a multiplier to my IQ.
You have to hand it to the old Soviet engineers who devised the need for all the mechanical technology on Soyuz craft.
Yet another comment echoing everyone else's -- this is so cool, thank you, guys, etc.
UUUUUUAAAUUUUUU
Fantastic
"Oddly anachronistic" It's kinda hard to know which time period this actually belongs in, I do love it so :)
Damn boi were do you find all your stuf
Your doing a great ting documenting all this stuf.
Sad that all this information can't be shared when it's needed the most
After a world wide blackout
I could switch that back and forth from landing to orbit, all day. I must be part rat though, that consistent clicking in the background makes me want to run away.
For people who criticizes this unit for its limitations: please notice that in russian it is called literally as "space navigation indicator". So the unit does NOT pretend to be any kind of advanced smart universal digital "computer".
what a pretty color EL
👍 FANTASTIC !!! 🍺🍺🍺😁
If you don't have the landing angle from mission control perhaps you can guess one and switch back and forth between the two modes and see where you land and adjust to suit...
Can You set it so it tracks ISS location 24/7 at Your desk? Inclination is not very off...
It'd be cool to get one of these and sync it up with the position of the ISS just to sit on a desk and click away the position
Congratulations, comrades! Let’s celebrate and have some vodka!
you guys inspire me that no electronics troubleshooting is ever too hard
That music sounds like the theme song from the cartoon Worker and Parasite...
Это музыка из русской песни "Полюшко поле"
@@Viktor-g8 Спасибо. Телевизионное анимационное шоу Симпсонов (американское) представляло собой сатиру на старый советский мультфильм эпохи «железного занавеса» и использовало песню, звучащую как эта.
I had to type the cyrillic letters into google translate. "МЕСТО ПОСАДКИ" translates to "LANDING LOCATION"
Magnificent
I'm curious how exactly this was used in flight. I imagine they would place the globus in landing mode and when the landing point gets to the desired landing zone, they would initiate the deorbit burn.
That's it.
Exactly.
To expand on this a bit, mission control would send them the various landing opportunities for each day. They were sent the orbit number, the time for the burn, and the landing angle (ugol posadki), and it's this angle that they input into the instrument to use in landing mode. This angle would depend on the orbital altitude.
Круто!
I find your (necessary) expertise in things electronic fascinating and unreachable (to me), insofar as the _black arts_ necessary to revive these old _doodly-do_ space-boxes.
I note from the Soviet engineers a lack of sensitivity to considerations of human-machine interface. Can you imagine living in a spherical refrigerator for days, surrounded by slow but sure death, relying on a mechanism the cosmonaut cannot turn off, going _clack-clack-clack_ until s/he would want to breathe vacuum to end the duress, if the mission were long enough?
All function, no form
Yeah, that's my kind of engineering
The loud clicking must have driven the cosmonauts nuts.
About the "old" instrument: in an documentation about russian space program and the sojuz they said (if I remember correctly) that the sojuz hasn't changed much over the years, because the russians are quite pragmatic. If it works, why change it and create new problems?
It is not the only reason, to be honest. The bureaucratic procedures to confirm that the new equipment was reliable enough to fly into space were very tedious (and largely meaningless). So, why do something if you can do nothing?
But when it was necessary, they worked as hard as they could. A good example is the development of spacesuits for the Soyuz-Apollo mission
The world changes. There was nothing "wrong" with Stradivarius violins. If you're missing components you use current components.
But this device only marginally "works". It's not a general navigation instrument. It's a map display that shows what should be happening if the craft is on the nominal flight path, limited to a circular unperturbed orbit at a single fixed inclination. It's sole degree of freedom is a minor correction for the altitude (orbital period). Even for that it requires two adjustments, with the second being the externally calculated angle of the landing point.
"It's simpler and just as good" can sometimes be true, but often it's just a coping mechanism.
This is a beautiful instrument and a wonderful piece of history, but it was a dead end. It wasn't going to get the soviets to the next level of space travel.
@@1djbecker My comment was about the sojuz spacecraft, not about a single instrument or device.
10:26: МЕСТО ПОСАДКИ
Двигатель ДПМ стоит лайк
It would be sweet to repurpose the Globus to always show the ISS position for example.
Do you think you could get one of the Mercury devices and restore it? Was that device used on Gemini too?
“Curious Marc” : 21st century ‘Dexter’s Lab’.
The markings on the ball make it seem that it is just a shop-purchased school globe - it indicates the year, the scale, even major shipping routs, which wouldn't be useful in space, but was marked in all geography textbooks back in the time.
Am I correct to assume that Soviet and US borders are actually hand-pained with a red sharpie?
If you have to unexpectedly ditch in the ocean I'd probably pick near a major shipping route given the choice.
I see. Since the "Globus" ball has no hole in the pole, I'd say is is purpose-made, but delivered from a civil globe factory.
Mercury Program Earth Path Indicator, on the other hand was indeed bought in a corner shop - it even has a hole in the pole, where the axis used to be!
@@volo870 Да, это так. У меня дома есть такой же
As for the closing comments: I still think the Russian version looks better than the American equivalent. Æsthetically they won this one. 😊
Thank you for the interesting material and congratulations to both gentlemen for their inquisitiveness. By the way - have you thought about how the engineers at CCCP came up with it. I am writing from Poland and we have encountered various Soviet devices here many times - they were always built differently than those from Western Europe and the USA. It's a different philosophy and way of thinking. The devices work, but they are quite difficult to repair. Greetings to Russian engineers!
Привет российским инженерам!
The words are pronounced "mesto posadki" (place of landing).
Flat earthers would be going nuts over this. 😂