ETHER 🌀 The ETHER exists, a simple experiment you can do

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 741

  • @DieterSoegemeier
    @DieterSoegemeier 29 днів тому +4

    5 years later and I still love this explination of the Aether.

  • @treizTUBE
    @treizTUBE 4 роки тому +63

    His point about light slowing down as it passes through a substance and accelerating as it leaves just blew my mind. I've observed this countless times and never stopped to think about it.

    • @tristanhigman6680
      @tristanhigman6680 2 роки тому

      No you didn’t idiot

    • @exclamationpointman3852
      @exclamationpointman3852 Рік тому

      Yes. This is interesting.

    • @NiteTrain345
      @NiteTrain345 3 місяці тому

      The physics behind this phenomenon is known.

    • @w.p.9509
      @w.p.9509 Місяць тому +1

      Light slows down in a medium: When light enters a substance like glass, water, or any transparent medium, its speed decreases compared to its speed in a vacuum. This happens because light interacts with the atoms and molecules of the medium. The slowing occurs due to the medium's refractive index (n), defined as: n = c/v, where c is the speed of light in a vacuum, and v is the speed of light in the medium. For example, in glass (n≈1.5), light travels at about two-thirds its speed in a vacuum. Light "accelerates" as it exits: When light leaves the medium and re-enters a vacuum (or air), its speed returns to c, the speed of light in a vacuum. This is not a true "acceleration" in the mechanical sense (as if a force is acting on the light). Instead, the speed of light is simply dependent on the properties of the medium it is traveling through. The energy of the light remains unchanged as it exits the medium, consistent with the law of conservation of energy.

  • @blakeeiu
    @blakeeiu 2 роки тому +129

    I realized in my first year as a physics grad student that most of modern physics was B.S. I realized very quickly that relativity was a sham and that we should have continued working on aether based theories.

    • @SolitarySwans
      @SolitarySwans 2 роки тому +16

      I told one of these psuedo space scientists that it was all BS and eh he said where are you credentials so I said that I have a mind of my own and it it adequate in imaginative thinking but not so good at parroting dogma 😆👍🕉️🙏

    • @TheZooman22
      @TheZooman22 2 роки тому +8

      I changed to Electrical engineering. Now I just dabble in the dark arts , in the shadow of Master Ken.

    • @handledav
      @handledav 2 роки тому +1

      relativity is aeþer

    • @mightyconker3903
      @mightyconker3903 Рік тому

      Modern physics.. and the rest of academia, {very obvious in art and architecture, or when biologists won't say male and female 🤡), The whole banking system, history in general, music...
      The same cabal has been running the show for a very long time.
      The earth is flat

    • @mightyconker3903
      @mightyconker3903 Рік тому

      Oh and germ theory..
      You cough up bits of dead cells.
      The body can excrete them in many ways.
      Those bits of dead cells aren't "viruses" waiting to recombine insure your body and kill cells.
      They just did an uno time reverse

  • @racerfe5948
    @racerfe5948 6 років тому +88

    'The coronal discharge proved that there must be a MEDIUM besides air in the space composed of PARTICLES immeasurably smaller than those of air' - Nikola Tesla, New York Herald Tribune.... EDIT: 'Ether is an ultra-rarified gas' - Nikola Tesla..... 'What is considered empty space is just a manifestation of matter that is not awakened. There is NO EMPTY SPACE on this planet nor in the universe.' - Nikola Tesla

    • @flatplaneoregon4605
      @flatplaneoregon4605 6 років тому +4

      @Racer FE
      Man you always find/know the best quotes.
      Well done

    • @racerfe5948
      @racerfe5948 6 років тому +17

      @Achaeos Salisbury 'It (ether) cannot differ in density, ether being incompressible' - Nikola Tesla .... 'these experiments demonstrate the fact that a gaseous medium upon which vibration is impressed by rapid changes of electrostatic potential is rigid' - Nikola Tesla.... this means the ether which is the medium that fills all space is an incompressible gas in which dielectricity, magnetism and electricity propagate through in the form of longitudinal and transverse waves.

    • @racerfe5948
      @racerfe5948 6 років тому +1

      I would say, no.... @Achaeos Salisbury

    • @racerfe5948
      @racerfe5948 6 років тому +2

      I would say no because I don't believe teleportation is possible but... look into Eric Dollard's work. He seems to believe that it is possible. @Achaeos Salisbury

    • @freemocean489
      @freemocean489 5 років тому +2

      UniversalExpanse can nothingness have a behavior, such as a wave or perturbation?

  • @Gleem
    @Gleem 6 років тому +94

    "Like screaming SATAN in a church" what an analogy so true!! So many people think the NULL Result was "Nah we didn't find it" hahaha

    • @codetech5598
      @codetech5598 6 років тому +6

      No, it's like turning on a light in a room invested with cockroaches.

    • @tomasotreasaigh111
      @tomasotreasaigh111 5 років тому +1

      You would get a FAR greater reaction if you shout FIRE!!

    • @jaybiswasyoutubechann1831
      @jaybiswasyoutubechann1831 5 років тому +1

      Gleem is my chair also ether or only the air around it.

    • @leoki4804
      @leoki4804 5 років тому +3

      Since we regard the Ether respectfully. It’s more appropriate to say Christ in a synagogue.

    • @benjaminhoover6427
      @benjaminhoover6427 5 років тому +1

      go hence, Brother, with yourself, to all churches and preach your lesons of reform!

  • @stefan110712
    @stefan110712 Рік тому +9

    If this is true and you know how it's working why don't you show us I don't get it why don't you show us

  • @NiveusLuxLucis
    @NiveusLuxLucis 5 років тому +26

    Glad you brought up the spooky action at the distance. When I was obsessed with astronomy and studying stuff in space, physics, facts bla bla this one fact shuttered everything for me. I had a sense that there was a lot of baloney in what I was studying and the presentations I was going to, always having a certain narrative / agenda and the fact that spooky action at a distance is proven fact is something that's simply too big to ignore, but the human ego (collective) of the current society is simply too big to accept the truth.
    This reality is fantastical and magical, just like from a movie but we believe otherwise, we are limiting our self's with false believes.

    • @TruthisWITHIN
      @TruthisWITHIN 3 роки тому +3

      Well said. I’m now starting to look into the Aether theory.

    • @NiveusLuxLucis
      @NiveusLuxLucis 2 роки тому +2

      ​@@msmontana1961 Because it's "unexplainable", it's not covered up but brushed a side with a pretty explanation. There is wealth of interesting phenomena that are totally mysterious to us, most of the time not worth looking into because somebody has to pay for that research and it doesn't meet the short term goal of PROFIT. The pursuit for profit has created a rotting society, it's a part of all industries.

  • @SilverTiger1981
    @SilverTiger1981 3 роки тому +11

    For those who are interested, he's right. The Michelson-Morley experiment was not set up to refute the ether, and it was definitely not an absurd experiment. It was first conducted by Albert Michelson in 1881, its purpose was pretty straight-forward: if the earth moves around the sun at 67,000 mph, and this movement is conducted through a medium that fills all of space through which light propagates (known as "luminiferous ether"), then a light beam discharged into the forward-westward direction of the earth's supposed motion would have its speed impeded to a degree that is proportional to the speed of the earth.
    With an expected fringe gap of 0.4 across the peaks, it was a failure, measuring only 0.02 (5% of the expected motion), which was considered a null result, but which we now know to be the actual measurement of ether flow. The crux at the end of it was that the earth was not moving.

    • @NiteTrain345
      @NiteTrain345 3 місяці тому

      The experiment was to confirm the Aether. They were surprised when they didn't find evidence of the Aether.

    • @ServantoftheMostMerciful_99
      @ServantoftheMostMerciful_99 2 місяці тому

      Its not moving?
      What then is the earth

    • @jamesfernandez5121
      @jamesfernandez5121 2 місяці тому

      @@ServantoftheMostMerciful_99 not a planet lol

    • @ServantoftheMostMerciful_99
      @ServantoftheMostMerciful_99 2 місяці тому

      @@jamesfernandez5121 what is it then?

    • @33Stripes
      @33Stripes 2 місяці тому

      ​@@ServantoftheMostMerciful_99 technically there is no term that exists for it, since it is one of a kind.

  • @royledford5673
    @royledford5673 5 років тому +66

    Whether I agree or disagree on various topics, Dude...YOU MAKE ME THINK.

    • @user-gl1lr2qn6y
      @user-gl1lr2qn6y 5 років тому +8

      I wish more people thought like you. Give it about 5-10 years more disinformation and the whole nation might begin to say the same thing.

    • @ChadDidNothingWrong
      @ChadDidNothingWrong 5 років тому +6

      I know. I like reading about alternative theories of magnetism, etc...
      Regardless of how unlikely, there is ALWAYS a chance that SOME aspects of the accepted models could be misinterpretations of the data.... So this is valuable.

    • @royledford5673
      @royledford5673 5 років тому +6

      Ditto both Travis & Jon. I am told the true measure of intellect lies in the capacity to reason to a conclusion...as opposed to from one. Mainstream Academia is notorious for just exactly THAT.

    • @csaitruthorg393
      @csaitruthorg393 4 роки тому

      Einstein in his 1920 lecture has stated that space without ether is unthinkable for then space would not possess any physical qualities when in reality it possesses numerous qualities. The Michelson-Morley experiment failed to detect ether because it is present from above the KARMAN LINE i.e. outer space. To know about the various physical qualities of space and irrefutable presence of ether in outer space you must watch the video in my you tube link. ua-cam.com/video/kFSemmlKOb8/v-deo.html Please subscribe and share our channel so that more and more people become aware of the truth.

    • @alexandermurcia5525
      @alexandermurcia5525 4 роки тому +4

      Roy Ledford they didn’t refute the eather, they proved they Earth doesn’t move.
      It proved that there is no rotating around the sun.

  • @truthquest1194
    @truthquest1194 9 місяців тому +2

    The ether exists. The Michelson Morley proved the earth does not move. I am a Geocentrist.

  • @bandogbone3265
    @bandogbone3265 4 роки тому +24

    Static magnetic fields extend farther than some might think. Years ago, while playing with magnets and LEGO with my grade-school son, we built a two-foot long truss structure, mounted neodymium magnets on its ends, suspended it from a chandelier by a six foot long thread attached to its center, balanced horizontally, and waited for it to come to rest pointing North. I still had another magnet in my pocket, and when I walked into the next room, my son exclaimed, "hey, it moved again!" I found I could go down the hall and into another room, about 20 feet away, and make the suspended structure move by flipping the magnet over in my hand, back and forth. I guess those equations and Gauss meters need an update!

    • @Blazeww
      @Blazeww 2 роки тому +5

      So. In reality don't magnetic fields move at light speed and effect other fields. So that little magnets field effects way further than 20ft. Might not be able to measure it with anything but it might even effect the farthest stars. Odd to how gravity never goes to zero for any object at any distance...
      So even if its field doesn't reach into the universe so weakly we cant measure it. It still effects the furthest stars.

  • @martinlicht1969
    @martinlicht1969 5 років тому +23

    Thanks for sharing common sense and the voices of greats like Charles , Oliver, Nikola, and the others. I always remember Ed Leedskalnin...he loved riddles and used them to inspire folks to think. His book Magnetic Current points out the ether with his magnetic current experiment showing instantaneous action at distance using a magnet having small field and causing an array of hanging, magnetized wires to begin moving at several yards away. He indicated that electricity is a hybrid of magnetism and understood the sun and moon as partners in leveraging mother natures wheel works.
    Thanks for really drilling down on all this..I know it's frustrating that we were all thrown under the bus regarding education..and when Ed said things are far different than your text books indicate, he was smeared away like a smashed fly on a windshield.
    I'm old now and glad to see you holding up the voice of reason, logic, common sense...and the only way it can be.

  • @beenthereonce
    @beenthereonce 6 років тому +52

    Bring back the Ether! Of course, it never went anywhere except outside the narrative of modern "science".

    • @soostdijk
      @soostdijk 5 років тому +5

      arachnipope space is by definition void of properties but in math everything is possible, even bending nothing. At least Newton still had some common sense with his apple :)

    • @csaitruthorg393
      @csaitruthorg393 4 роки тому

      so so so true Einstein in his 1920 lecture has stated that space without ether is unthinkable for then space would not possess any physical qualities when in reality it possesses numerous qualities. The Michelson-Morley experiment failed to detect ether because it is present from above the KARMAN LINE i.e. outer space. To know about the various physical qualities of space and irrefutable presence of ether in outer space you must watch the video in my you tube link. ua-cam.com/video/kFSemmlKOb8/v-deo.html Please subscribe and share our channel so that more and more people become aware of the truth.

    • @csaitruthorg393
      @csaitruthorg393 4 роки тому

      Einstein in his 1920 lecture has stated that space without ether is unthinkable for then space would not possess any physical qualities when in reality it possesses numerous qualities. The Michelson-Morley experiment failed to detect ether because it is present from above the KARMAN LINE i.e. outer space. To know about the various physical qualities of space and irrefutable presence of ether in outer space you must watch the video in my you tube link. ua-cam.com/video/kFSemmlKOb8/v-deo.html Please subscribe and share our channel so that more and more people become aware of the truth.

    • @csaitruthorg393
      @csaitruthorg393 4 роки тому

      @@arachnipope Einstein in his 1920 lecture has stated that space without ether is unthinkable for then space would not possess any physical qualities when in reality it possesses numerous qualities. The Michelson-Morley experiment failed to detect ether because it is present from above the KARMAN LINE i.e. outer space. To know about the various physical qualities of space and irrefutable presence of ether in outer space you must watch the video in my you tube link. ua-cam.com/video/kFSemmlKOb8/v-deo.html Please subscribe and share our channel so that more and more people become aware of the truth.

    • @csaitruthorg393
      @csaitruthorg393 4 роки тому

      @@arachnipope Einstein in his 1920 lecture has stated that space without ether is unthinkable for then space would not possess any physical qualities when in reality it possesses numerous qualities. The Michelson-Morley experiment failed to detect ether because it is present from above the KARMAN LINE i.e. outer space. To know about the various physical qualities of space and irrefutable presence of ether in outer space you must watch the video in my you tube link. ua-cam.com/video/kFSemmlKOb8/v-deo.html Please subscribe and share our channel so that more and more people become aware of the truth.

  • @isaact.blades355
    @isaact.blades355 5 років тому +7

    Does anyone know if there a video anywhere of this experiment being executed?

  • @nicolegagnon4642
    @nicolegagnon4642 5 років тому +10

    Fascinating....me and my roommate will be talking about this for days!

  • @widewinger1454
    @widewinger1454 2 роки тому +2

    No such thing as a total vacuum in space. We calculate & feel the Sun's effects by measuring such things as plasma or solar wind speed & density.

    • @KenTheoriaApophasis
      @KenTheoriaApophasis  2 роки тому

      theres NO PRESSURE at all, still a total vacuum definitionally

    • @widewinger1454
      @widewinger1454 2 роки тому +1

      @@KenTheoriaApophasis If a vacuum existed we would be measuring it.

    • @BeefyMcBeefFace
      @BeefyMcBeefFace Місяць тому

      ​@@KenTheoriaApophasis there is... it's not measurable though. That's all.

  • @MrForlines
    @MrForlines 5 років тому +3

    Let's not forget, ether can be purchased as well it comes in a can....

    • @kaloyancholakov3725
      @kaloyancholakov3725 Місяць тому

      You also buy air with every bag of chips but that is another topic.

  • @FinalAffliction
    @FinalAffliction 2 роки тому +1

    Do you know what that symbol beside ether really means?

  • @eu29lex16
    @eu29lex16 2 роки тому +4

    I mean, many scientists are all like "Well Einstein showed why relativity is good and why ether doesn't exist, so Tesla was wrong, cuz he was not a actual scientist, like Einstein was, he just a engineer/inventor/techwizard" Me : wait a minute, but Einstein also added ether to his theories ! Scientist : Well yeah, Einstein was wrong too, I like his original theory more ! Me : Yeah, you are just being subjective about things .

  • @spectralvalkyrie
    @spectralvalkyrie 3 роки тому +5

    Im grateful for you.
    We will never know how Schrodinger's cat fares when the person that loves it the most prays for its life after finding out psychopaths put it in a box.

  • @jimcarrey7006
    @jimcarrey7006 5 років тому +34

    I'm pretty sure another word the dopple quantum gang use for aether would be "dark matter", which nicely correlates with your don't talk about satan reference.

    • @hellucination9905
      @hellucination9905 5 років тому +9

      It's like a modern religion. An mathematical theology.

    • @lightsclockwork5596
      @lightsclockwork5596 3 роки тому +1

      @@hellucination9905 If you drop a ball from 1.2 meters in the air, how long will it take to hit the ground under Earth-normal gravity? To make it easy you can ignore air resistance and only worry about being accurate to the millisecond.

    • @nowonmetube
      @nowonmetube Місяць тому

      Dark matter is something completely different.

  • @jarretcalmenson2742
    @jarretcalmenson2742 6 років тому +21

    Ken, recall the experiment with the quartz crystal being able to feel the field from further away. Question, with testing ether pertibation on the TV 80 feet away, could a quartz crystal be used in sone way, somewhere inbetween the neodymium magnet and the TV to enhance the field pertibation, whereby increasing the effect on the TV? Thank you.

    • @JennySimon206
      @JennySimon206 5 років тому +5

      I had found some articles saying they discovered a new type of magnetism that behaves like a liquid using qusrtz crystals. I told Ken about it in a live chat and now I can't find them anymore.... grr...

    • @DougieD_Funk
      @DougieD_Funk 2 роки тому

      @@JennySimon206 who is ‘they’?

  • @EvolveWithConnor
    @EvolveWithConnor 2 роки тому +3

    Question we see heat waves from a fire or heat on cement does that have to do with disruption of the ether

    • @Hydroverse
      @Hydroverse 10 місяців тому +1

      That's hot air rising in a turbulent fashion as the cooler air must flow in to take the hot air's place.
      If you want to see matter warping light, then take a flat sheet of material, and create a millimeter-sized pinhole. Bring it close to your pupil, and keep your focus on an image through the hole (preferably a grid). Then proceed to move the hole around as you maintain focus on the image. You should see a lens-like distortion.

  • @oak4901
    @oak4901 Рік тому +3

    The Michaelson-Morley experiment actually proved the existence of the Aether! (speed of propagation in a medium is independant of direction)

  • @dukepalatinemmxx2098
    @dukepalatinemmxx2098 4 роки тому +10

    I have been meditating, properly, for basically all my life, I am nearly 60, I got this information in my intuitive mind 20 years ago. I've been exploring the inner recesses of my own mind intensively and simultaneously, as I exponentially got to know my true being, the workings of the Universe were revealed as well, as per the inscription at Delphi: 'Man know thyself and ye will know God and the Universe', I have personally experienced this.
    And the knowledge that I 'got' from 'somewhere' matches 100% with all that you are saying, as a rare, logical and thinking Scientist.
    The Electric Universe Thunderbolts YT and Energy Wave Theory YT channels also matches elegantly with the accurate electro- magnetic Cosmological view of our dynamic Universe.
    It's wonderfully rare and enjoyable to listen to an intelligent human such as yourself speaking your mind.
    Whatever the Aether is scientifically, first and truly it is information, consciousness, intelligence and creativeness in its very essence, the nothing out of which everything miraculously appear...

  • @RobertSpreadborough
    @RobertSpreadborough 4 роки тому +14

    The Ether connects your mind to this reality - happy days:-)

  • @PRACTICALBUSHCRAFTSURVIVAL
    @PRACTICALBUSHCRAFTSURVIVAL Рік тому +1

    great info...p,s can you tell me where you got the fire effect on your iMac thank you

  • @michaelhiggins6462
    @michaelhiggins6462 5 років тому +4

    Ether is truly reality of all constant and consumed energy,thank you.

    • @pand0ras
      @pand0ras 5 років тому +1

      you can't consume energy, unlessyou are chuck norris.

  • @rdpurdom
    @rdpurdom 2 місяці тому +1

    Do we have any idea what ether is composed of?

  • @logos1.618
    @logos1.618 6 років тому +9

    Ken, these videos are awesome and I really appreciate the fact that there is someone to go to when Plotinus is hard to conceptualise. Thank you for your work, I love this deep comprehension. Everything else in the world seems so minute in comparison.

  • @Nicholas_Shaw.
    @Nicholas_Shaw. 6 років тому +9

    Love it when you hit them all the way through the ether and out of the park.

  • @aljawisa
    @aljawisa 5 років тому +3

    It would be nice to see this experiment on youtube.

  • @jasonlyu2184
    @jasonlyu2184 5 років тому +5

    Particles are just small swirls in aether. Eletric field and magnet field are other kinds of swirls in aether. You can get anti gravity by pushing aether downward.

    • @DieterSoegemeier
      @DieterSoegemeier 5 років тому

      Anti gravity is the opposit of gravity.{ Opposits attract }. You want to fly through the aether then you have to push your self away, that means that you need a gravitational field to push agenst the other gravitational field { likes repel } Experiment;- Get 2 large magnets, get a friend to hold one and you hold the other. Then each of you go sit in a rubber dingy each in a large pool full of water/aether, now hold the magnets up so they are facing each other so you are holding the north pole/gravity towards your frends magnet and your friend holding the soutj pole.antigravity towards you and see what happens? end result is you come together more quickly the closer you get.
      Now seporate the magnets and this ti,e get your friend to face the north pole/gravity side of kis magnet towards your north pole/gravity magnet, now what is the result, the result is that you both push away from each other very quickly.
      conclusion is;- Gravith is a pushing force.

  • @AaronAJaeger
    @AaronAJaeger 6 років тому +12

    Eureka! A field is where the horses and cows are raised and feed.

  • @nfg_racing7968
    @nfg_racing7968 2 роки тому +1

    I know this is an older video but this is one of the problems with our science when fail to prove something the first time it just simply can't exist which is bull crap

  • @TrevsTravelTales
    @TrevsTravelTales 5 років тому +3

    Meditate on the ether and you will see that energy exists everywhere, less dense or power full in between solid seen objects. I have seen it many times.

  • @deyanaclark7132
    @deyanaclark7132 9 місяців тому

    This video was fantastic. I loved everything about it. He is such a personality and idk how I came across the word Aether but it brought me here and I don’t regret it. Thank you for the eye opening message

  • @theganymedehypothesis4057
    @theganymedehypothesis4057 5 років тому +1

    So you're saying that the magnet could only directly affect the cathode ray tube to a distance of a foot and a half to three feet or so max and therefore what you have when you wave that same magnet from 20 or more feet distance from the CRT is that the matnet is causing ether perturbations which affect the CRT, do I have that right?

  • @peteshea155
    @peteshea155 3 роки тому +1

    AETHER stems from Aristarchus, the divided tree of life. AETHER and flat and stationary enclosed earth surface go hand in hand.

  • @KarenB
    @KarenB 6 років тому +43

    The ether is undeniable. So true.

    • @mrMacMilli2000
      @mrMacMilli2000 6 років тому

      i kno something eles ... undeniable

    • @codetech5598
      @codetech5598 6 років тому

      @@mrMacMilli2000 Yes, it is undeniable that the Earth is shaped like a ball.

    • @mrMacMilli2000
      @mrMacMilli2000 6 років тому

      @@codetech5598 Hell. goto . collect 200 or wut ever . i dont care

    • @mrMacMilli2000
      @mrMacMilli2000 6 років тому +1

      @Joe Chang vacuum is undisturbed Aether ... you cant vacuum away Aether. lol

    • @mrMacMilli2000
      @mrMacMilli2000 6 років тому +2

      @Joe Chang its Nothing and Everything. its the underlying substance of everything.

  • @periurban
    @periurban 5 років тому +12

    The experiment you describe does not prove the aether. It proves action at a distance. But you haven't shown the mechanism. Furthermore, the close field influence that you demonstrate by waving your hands near your head is entirely arbitrary. The equations show a falling off with distance, but a highly sensitive distant receptor might well pick up the field without any need for aether. But it would be nice to see you do this experiment yourself.

    • @larrybryant4827
      @larrybryant4827 5 років тому +1

      periurban , What would be suitable “proof”. Given that the credibility of the greatest minds that have ever graced this planet have supported the Aether concept, I believe we need to turn your argument around toward the supporters of Relativity, which Tesla describes as "a beggar wrapped in purple whom ignorant people take for a king."

    • @Tbonyandsteak
      @Tbonyandsteak 5 років тому +1

      The field are not even defined.
      They try to do it with particles.
      Totally bogus......
      There is still a field

    • @meh11235
      @meh11235 5 років тому

      please prove relativity..oh wait, it's a theory...that is incomplete

    • @larrybryant4827
      @larrybryant4827 5 років тому

      Me H , Watch the lectures at this link: ua-cam.com/video/MmppxVo-rkk/v-deo.html
      He outlines in a straight forward manner why Relativity is wrong !

    • @gilesleggett
      @gilesleggett 5 років тому

      Dude you failed because you used the word 'field' without defining it. Nearly though.

  • @Directory1
    @Directory1 10 місяців тому +1

    I'm back for a review thank you.

  • @erichbojarzin369
    @erichbojarzin369 6 років тому +6

    Two things. I used to have an old Marshall guitar amp with a speaker cabinet that had 4 10” speakers each with a 4” magnet. If the speaker cabinet was beside our old tube TV it would completely warp the television picture. Secondly, I was told years ago that if you found just static on an old tube TV and turned the contrast all the way down so the static picture was just a few bright spots racing around a black field that that was background radiation in space.

    • @markg1051
      @markg1051 5 років тому

      I think that what you'll find is that the random bright spots on the screen are same white noise on a visual spectrum as the white noise you get from a high gain Marshall amp or any high gain distortion pedal. Turning down the contrast reduces or removes smaller or weaker noise pulses which emphasizes the strong ones. You could probably ge a similar effect in audio if you feed a noisy high gain pedal into a noise gate pedal with an adjustable threshold which can be set so that only the strongest noise pulses break through over the threshold guitar - not needed for this.
      Without getting to technical, at least in electronic audio amplifying devices there is a constant amount of this background white noise all generated by various components making up an electronic item. If you have heard or are aware of a term "signal to noise ratio" you maybe able to imagine how with the background noise being constant and relatively low in level a clean amp with lower gain will always be less noisy than the one with much more gain. A good way to visualise the effects of gain in an amplifier is to compare it to a magnifying lens, it zooms in and sees the rough floor surface, the more gain or magnification, the rougher the view of things you are looking at.
      Hope you're still playing that Marshall!

    • @stevesims2243
      @stevesims2243 3 роки тому

      analog circuits (tubes) can only approach zero noise. Digital circuits are eponentially cleaner. Analog can pick up dirty emf from many different sources, especially with the gain turned up.

  • @mikematthews8573
    @mikematthews8573 3 роки тому +2

    When Prince introduced ' Purple Rain' it took your Mind to the Ethereal! What it meant was Royals Reign thru History, but His Story is not our story...

  • @jkmurphy3
    @jkmurphy3 6 років тому +21

    I think the kiddies are calling it “dark matter” now.....
    Man walks into a bar with a 2x2x2 neo.
    Man sticks to the bar.....
    Bartender says what can i get you.
    Man says . . . . Help!

    • @killer1963daddy
      @killer1963daddy 4 роки тому

      Exactly what I was thinking....you must have transmitted to me through the aether lol!. Or not so lol.....I'm glad this guy misspelled aether...or I would not have found this dude. Or maybe he did that to me through the starting fluid called ether.....that'll really fry your gray matter!

  • @aquavitae3824
    @aquavitae3824 6 років тому +2

    Thank you Ken for all your faithful work. Humanity is so much better for it!

  • @w.p.9509
    @w.p.9509 Місяць тому

    The effect he describes (that a magnet can influence a CRT screen at a greater distance than expected) can be explained without the ether. The magnetic field of a magnet does decrease with distance, but it does not disappear completely. Furthermore, a CRT screen is extremely sensitive to electromagnetic disturbances, even from weak fields.

  • @sciencevigilante6133
    @sciencevigilante6133 Рік тому +1

    Ken is a living legend

  • @sammygibson3045
    @sammygibson3045 3 роки тому +1

    The ether filled the empty space and it goes through all solid things including our bodies. Remember matters is liquid!

  • @1danacom
    @1danacom 5 років тому +4

    From Harold Waldwin Percival’s Book - “Thinking & Destiny”
    THE POINT OR CIRCLE
    SECTION 1
    “From the form plane the physical universe may be like a speck. The form plane is as much vaster than the physical plane as the ocean is vaster than the sponge in it. Yet the matter of the form plane can be understood only by that matter of the form plane which is in some part of the physical plane. The ether, that is, the solid matter of the form plane, can be perceived and dealt with from the physical plane only through a point. The ether is entered through a point just as from a point or points in the ether comes the whole physical universe.”

  • @nicholaslozenski5149
    @nicholaslozenski5149 6 років тому +12

    All the evidence in Scientific research suggests that all matter/enwrgy is just one substance, literally their is no division in nature in the absolute sense.

    • @ProdigyLunatic
      @ProdigyLunatic 5 років тому +1

      @Penseur Radical you do realize the whole point of science is to observe theorized ideas using mathematics/technology. Sure you can say mathematics/technology is a human construct. But the whole point of it is to use external/verifiable techniques outside ourselves to "prove" the best we can with the proposed math/technology.
      This is the closest thing we have to objective thinking/reasoning/definition. Without the subject "us" polluting the results. Now, if you want to talk about how scientists interpret their findings then sure. That's a discussion that should be had by the majority to reduce bias as much as possible.
      I do "believe" that spirituality is one part of the pie, asking the fundamental questions that plague our modern/pre-historic walk on this existence. Science is there to take those questions and use math to create technology to confirm "to the best of our knowledge/technology" that what was theorized in that moment. for the observer to be true.

    • @Sciurus
      @Sciurus 5 років тому +1

      One substance like the Prima Materia of the Alchemists? Maybe they werent all cranks after all like the academics would lead us to believe... maybe it is time to look over those Emerald Tablets of Thoth again!

  • @rfpcs1
    @rfpcs1 5 років тому +9

    The Earth's magnetic field has an effect on Color Tube TV's they have a builtin degaussing coil other wise your color would be off , even turning those TV's while on can cause a shift on the colors/

  • @nihorothereal
    @nihorothereal 5 років тому +3

    Unfortunately I watched till the end and still did not hear any answers offered in the beginning to be answered here. Whole video is just blah blah blah. And even calling me names. If you give a statement and do not back it up with anything, just repeat, repeat, repeat, you are a preacher for some weird religion. Ether exists, ether exists. Well, it might, but you did not provide anything, even a hypothesis to back it up.

    • @onewordhereonewordthere6975
      @onewordhereonewordthere6975 4 роки тому

      It will not let me comment to a comment. 💡that is not a good sign for peer review plus you watch his eyes he. reads. script from the right side !
      Holy Wood !
      At its beast/ best !

  • @Timschannel2
    @Timschannel2 4 роки тому +2

    I agree the Ether exists. There is no ether wind. The Michelson Morely expierement accidentally proved that the Earth is stationary without a doubt.

  • @Bakedchats
    @Bakedchats 5 місяців тому

    This was fascinating, although way outside of my understanding. I was just introduced to the word Ether (in this context) today and it's a lot to get my head around.

  • @mightyconker3903
    @mightyconker3903 Рік тому +1

    What is "outer space"?

  • @thealanscottmycandless6014
    @thealanscottmycandless6014 2 роки тому +2

    Would auditory hallucinations help explain the ether? How can I hear a sound in my mind, that sounds like it's outside of my mind, without an "outside" force present? Unless the "sound" is always present IN the ether. Not a particle or wave but a "bubble". A glass onion of sound bubbles. Condensed by conscious perception? Some sort of acoustic levitation of Ether that's a result of magnetism in some fashion I don't fully comprehend. Sonoluminesence and Cymatics also have something to do with this dance of matter and light we call the Human Experience. Harmonics and Musical Wizardry a foot. The silence in between the notes, string the song together.

  • @lvitch
    @lvitch 6 років тому +2

    Easiest way to prove the either is Z. The impedance ratio of free space in a vacuum. Its a physical constant. The 377. Done.

  • @Lunachick711
    @Lunachick711 9 місяців тому

    What is the difference between ether and aether

    • @rw2452
      @rw2452 5 місяців тому

      Either iether

  • @Hossupinya
    @Hossupinya 5 років тому +4

    Thank you for all of your work my friend.

  • @r2com641
    @r2com641 5 років тому +28

    Just make an experiment rather than talking about it

  • @NotAnnaJones
    @NotAnnaJones 3 роки тому

    You sound so much happier here in these videos then in the new ones. I think this pandemic has been kicking all our asses. Chin up!

  • @rogerfurer2273
    @rogerfurer2273 5 років тому +3

    See also: Ether-Drift Experiments at Mt. Wilson by Dayton C. Miller in1920s. Although much maligned and concealed, this information is now somewhat available. He found evidence for ether in statistically significant data, much greater than Michelson-Morley.

  • @70wolfnipplechips41
    @70wolfnipplechips41 5 років тому +8

    I'm curious about your thoughts on the Electric Universe theory. You know so much about magnetism and electricity, you would be able to see the implications and possibilities far better than I do.

    • @70wolfnipplechips41
      @70wolfnipplechips41 5 років тому

      @@metaphysicalmigraine694 They go well with badger's spleens😋

    • @karlp8484
      @karlp8484 5 років тому +2

      I am familiar with the Electric Universe Theory. I see no significant difference between what he says and that theory. If there is I challenge anybody to tell me what it is. "Sound of crickets chirping"

    • @Chaunton
      @Chaunton 4 роки тому +1

      @@karlp8484 one thing I've noticed: Wal and friends are talking about an electric dipole gravity. That is one thing that is different. Ken recognizes it as dielectric acceleration. I find the Thunderbolts either ignore dielectricity or they lump it in with electricity. If both concepts are present, I don't see/hear a differentiation. Electricity has always fascinated me. Now it's only really dielectricity.

  • @jd-qy1mn
    @jd-qy1mn Рік тому

    idk why but this guy looks like a credible physics source

  • @traviskeith3802
    @traviskeith3802 5 років тому +2

    Did you ever give the deffenition of ether? If not could ether be part or all of the fabric of space?

    • @studionomad6206
      @studionomad6206 5 років тому +2

      ether is considered to be basically the fabric of space, but its usually imagined to be like a fluid

  • @Derek-Moran
    @Derek-Moran 5 років тому +2

    Are there any implications with this experiment if you were using an MRI machine ?
    Are powerful MRI machines causing effects at great distance, that people are not aware of ?
    Every time I have had an MRI, I feel really "spun out" for at least an hour - the more time in the machine, the worse I feel afterwards.

  • @MrAj198
    @MrAj198 5 років тому +3

    I really enjoyed this video, thank you for posting it.

  • @BrettHoustonTube
    @BrettHoustonTube 2 роки тому

    Why not grab an old tube TV and film the demonstration so one can see?

  • @martinlicht1969
    @martinlicht1969 5 років тому

    Awesome experiment..will do with my grandchildren...thanks and stay well..

  • @danielneal2507
    @danielneal2507 5 років тому +1

    What the michelson-morley experiment did was prove that the Earth does not spin as modern "science" states, I don't believe the Earth is flat but it does prove that we exist in a geocentric model

  • @EricMathiasen
    @EricMathiasen 6 років тому +1

    Honest question: If magnets could influence tube television at such a distance, why weren't tube TVs experiencing massive influence by all the magnetic field disruptions near them? I'm not sure where you live, but where I live is pretty dense, where there are probably several hundred (at a bare minimum) magnets of strength equivalent to a 2-inch magnet within 80 feet at any given time. Many would be stationary, but not a small number would be in cars going by. I had tube televisions in every place I lived, including the place I currently live, until maybe five years ago, and didn't see interference on it that seemed in any way related to anything nearby short of a lightening strike so I'm just curious why it wouldn't be more apparent.

    • @esterhammerfic
      @esterhammerfic Рік тому

      I think you poked a hole in what he's saying, hence no response

  • @stevesims2243
    @stevesims2243 3 роки тому +1

    The ether is plasma.All plasma is just electrically charged atoms and molecules. Like charges attract, opposites separate. The sun is a charge separation engine, and the charges remain separated for a time because electrons travel faster than protons. Plasma makes up the ether. Scientism says plasma is the 4th state of matter. I say it is the first. Space is not a vacuum; it's a disbursed plasma field.Principle of diffusion. The electrical volativity of plasma enables it to congeal along magnetic lines, ergo the Northern Lights. The heliosphere is plasma at various concentrations. The Russians proved the Sun is a solid ball much smaller than the electrically-boiling corona that we see. Only concentrated plasma emits visible light. Lightning is an example. Comets are another. When comets move vertically through the heliosphere, they collect plasma on the way in, and emit it on the way out. Comets are capacitors (as is the sun), and can discharge when they get within range of a planet. This is action at a distance. The discharge is lightning, a.k.a. plasma. It's a plasma discharge, resulting in craters. The crater-pocked bodies orbiting the sun are the result of a much more plasmicly-active time. Correlation of mythologically-recorded "battles in the heavens" are simply discharges between the planets. Jupiter and Saturn are brown dwarfs by definition, as they give off more heat than they receive. They are plasma generators. As the myths tell, the giants each took turns, or sometimes shared, the role of central sun. I think it was the old Chronos Magazine where it was postulated that the current Solar system is the result of the merger, or slow collision, of two separate sol systems, Saturn being the secondary, or inferior, and therefore gave up its mantle, or corona, plasma crown. It's up to unreported history to reveal the exact makeup of those two separate systems. However, Jupiter and Sol were the two original members of the solar system.
    Most of this information can be found in the works of James McCanney, astrophysicist who coined the term Electric Universe, and who was blackballed from Cornell U. where Mr. Billions, Carl "Satan" Sagan, was head of the astronomy department. Cornell is one of the Nasa repositories, and all universities must regurgitate the same old tired myths of biggus bangus and gravity supremus. Holy Blackwash from your sinister brothers at the Ka, Ba, and LaLa Land. Greetings, fellow msuhrooms. They keep us in the dark and feed us b.s. © Stephen E. Sims 7/20/21

  • @GarnettLeary
    @GarnettLeary 6 років тому +1

    This is interesting. I need this analyzed further. I understand the concept but I’m not 100% on why it works. The fuzz on the screen is obviously “space noise” so to speak. I’m interested on wether or not two viewers will witness the same influence. I doubt it. Thoughts? I’m not near a television for two weeks so If anyone wants to test please let me know your results.

  • @michaelpinkston4628
    @michaelpinkston4628 4 роки тому +1

    Why does everyone mention the Michaelson Morely experiment but not Dayton Miller

  • @humwishdom
    @humwishdom 2 роки тому

    What is the difference between the ether and the astral?

    • @bounchofbeaners1868
      @bounchofbeaners1868 2 роки тому +3

      the aether is within the 3rd dimension it is part of the physycal world.
      we as humans exist in the 4th dimension because we are not bound by physycal reality but rather by time.
      asteral is within the spiritual dimension which is the 5th dimension..it is not bound by time nor space but by 6th dimension limitations.. which are not understood yet..

    • @humwishdom
      @humwishdom 2 роки тому

      @@bounchofbeaners1868 Thanks, yeah we can't even visualize things in 5 dimension with out minds.

    • @AstralApple
      @AstralApple 2 роки тому

      The astral plane is like a planetarium I think, and the inside of our cranium is where the sonoluminescence impacts. I think you have to seal the mind in order to tune into that plane. That means you have to completely contain the imagination. Whenever you feel a thought or envisioned idea stirring, you have to use vortical cymatic music theoretical vibrations to champion it. Then your mind may go into (a strange) overdrive ironically, and you may see yourself from outside your body i.e. astral projection. But if you do the technique properly, your body will be completely invisible, or at least you will sometimes argue that you can't see your body at all. That's when things get intriguing because you could in theory actually lose track of your physical body.
      Ken talks about disembodied beings. I don't believe in disembodiment, but I do believe in deluding one's self into losing track of it. Astral projection may be the art of losing one's own self, like an ultimate fool.

  • @risalatsabbir9689
    @risalatsabbir9689 5 років тому +1

    michelson said in his article about that experiment :
    "This conclusion directly contradicts the explanation…which presupposes that the Earth moves"
    michelson wanted to measure the earths speed around sun and it was null.

    • @risalatsabbir9689
      @risalatsabbir9689 5 років тому

      @@Paygelove yea but people are so dumb they dont want to accept the truth and rather they try to prove the false explanations which they were taught from childhood. They try so hard

    • @Bird_in_camera
      @Bird_in_camera 5 років тому

      What experiment was that from, can you give the URL for that scientific paper.

  • @bridgendesar
    @bridgendesar 5 років тому +1

    Isn't a radio wave the same thing?

  • @TimothyOng98
    @TimothyOng98 3 роки тому +3

    Ether= quantum foam, quantum field, zero point energy, cosmic background energy

  • @bo64hellfire
    @bo64hellfire 5 років тому

    The hilarity in an ad with NDT for Mind Master Class being played for this does not escape me.

  • @aaddebruijn3355
    @aaddebruijn3355 5 років тому +1

    How do you explain superposition, from your point of view?

  • @kittywampusdrums
    @kittywampusdrums 5 років тому +1

    Then why doesn't magnets from other sources in the house than what you're holding influence the TV too? -_-

  • @marvindelacruzreddamienstudios
    @marvindelacruzreddamienstudios 7 місяців тому +1

    I love the screen saver.

  • @christinamorin1914
    @christinamorin1914 4 роки тому

    I’m very amateurish in this conversation, but what if you created a vacuum big enough to put either a tv in and manipulate it with the magnet from the outside of the vacuum or a device to move a magnet inside the vacuum to influence the tv outside of the vacuum? Or even both in the vacuum? Whichever way puts a vacuum between the two. Wouldn’t that prove that the effect isn’t caused by molecules bumping into each other in a domino effect wave in the air?

  • @mrsudarshan6249
    @mrsudarshan6249 5 років тому +2

    Why should I wave with a magnet and look in telescope to see influence on a cathode tube TV, when it never has worked indoors?

  • @cornellete
    @cornellete 4 роки тому +1

    I wish you had visual animations to help some of us better visualize what you're saying. I love listening to you even as I have no idea what you're saying most of the time. It would be so neat to have a visual aid!

  • @joanking8708
    @joanking8708 5 років тому +4

    One's 3d body has an etheric template

  • @m.c.4674
    @m.c.4674 4 роки тому +1

    In physics, a field is a physical quantity, represented by a number or tensor, that has a value for each point in space and time. Wikipedia

    • @m.c.4674
      @m.c.4674 4 роки тому

      space and time doesn't make any sense

  • @samsonsimpson7648
    @samsonsimpson7648 5 років тому +13

    How you opened this monologue discussing the either was perfect “scientist” just change the name of age old concepts they call it the quantum wave theory now

    • @joshjgraham
      @joshjgraham 5 років тому +9

      Samson Simpson I’ve also heard professors talk about the “elements” of the ancients - air, water, earth, and fire - and how they were ignorant for not knowing what elements really were. But actually, if you just use “states of matter” in place of the word “elements”, they were spot on.

    • @thedevilsadvocate5210
      @thedevilsadvocate5210 5 років тому +1

      How is the states of matter appropriate?

    • @joshjgraham
      @joshjgraham 5 років тому +6

      The Devil's Advocate The 4 states of matter: Solid=earth, liquid=water, gas=air, plasma=fire

    • @samsonsimpson7648
      @samsonsimpson7648 5 років тому +2

      Ismee meant to keep people away from the truth and the power behind the technology

  • @deenababie
    @deenababie 2 роки тому

    Curious your thoughts on ether and plasma. Are they the same? I am trying to get more information on this subject but it is hard to find the actual info.

  • @Sugarxspicenails
    @Sugarxspicenails 3 роки тому +1

    This seems like an awesome experiment to try out!! Has anyone in the comments tried this?

    • @isomatic
      @isomatic 3 роки тому

      of course they havent

  • @IAMSIRIUS44
    @IAMSIRIUS44 3 роки тому +1

    Screaming out satan in the middle of church🤣🤣funny as hell

  • @acewoodworking428
    @acewoodworking428 6 років тому +1

    Ok. I’m not a super religious person. But you explaining mother nature doesn’t care what you call her is like the dude that asked god what his name was. I am that I am.

  • @ganeshapsychedelicrock4027
    @ganeshapsychedelicrock4027 2 роки тому

    So Quantum Computing, the same?

  • @JP-xy7yd
    @JP-xy7yd 6 років тому +1

    So next up. How do we bypass the time dimension. F=1/T ?If George van tassel isn’t full of it

    • @capnskull
      @capnskull 6 років тому

      Solve for T. Then manipulate F with scalar electromagnetic frequencies.

  • @hollenlandscaping
    @hollenlandscaping Рік тому +1

    this dudes friggin awesome

  • @suzipaloozie8242
    @suzipaloozie8242 5 років тому

    You are an intelligent person. Not just smart. Intelligent. Very hard to find these days...

  • @itsdaGloobyshow
    @itsdaGloobyshow 6 років тому +1

    If you've looked into the Poly Magnet company they 3d print magnets with north and south poles on one side creating mechanisms such as springs and locks through designs is there any way to get your hands on one and use it on the ferrocell?

    • @KenTheoriaApophasis
      @KenTheoriaApophasis  6 років тому +1

      that tech has been around since the 1960s

    • @itsdaGloobyshow
      @itsdaGloobyshow 6 років тому

      @@KenTheoriaApophasis oh wow I had no idea, that's amazing! Id love to see a segment on these if you could some day! One more thing, if I were to search for a job or just study, where should I begin in order to get a fuller understanding? PS You've been a great help in opening my eyes and I really appreciate all of your videos

  • @Gebbryrainman
    @Gebbryrainman 3 роки тому +2

    How does a pressurized atmosphere exist in a near absolute vacuum of "outer space" without a container to prevent pressure equilibrium? Please don't say gravity.

    • @TheRealCreepinogie
      @TheRealCreepinogie 3 роки тому

      It doesn't, there is a gradual transition. It works the same way water pressure is higher the deeper you go underneath the surface.

  • @psyopswitch
    @psyopswitch 22 дні тому

    When i was 10 my dad had a ham radio with a big antenna with a. magnet. When my brother wouldnt let me watch the TV, I would get that magnet and walk around our small living room. I could mess it up enough to annoy him. Such a shame I didn't have anyone that could teach me what I was doing. I loved degaussing it too.