The SC remained silent in the following cases. 1.When allegations made through media owned by then CM on PINK DIAMOND and Under ground treasures in 'Laddu potu' ( allegedly blamed CBN by then Govt) 2. Naarasura Raktha Charitra widely published shamelessly by the media owned by Jagan 3.when CBN was arrested and jailed 53 days by then CM witoout evidences. Now same SC is admolishing present CM for his commitment to restore sanctity of Prassdam at TTD. So, SC must honour the sentiments of HINDU DEVOTEES including judges of HCs & SC who keep visiting on protocol. Courts, in what direction they take up the matter and how fast they solve it is not known. If Govt also reluctant on solving the issue, who will protect the interests of devotees? Tackling the issue by CM and Govt can not be attributed to politicisation. If so, SC would have interfered when Non - Hindus were made trust members, chairman, EO and other Officials amidst protests from devotees.
Supreme Court lawyers and chief justice families get VIP treatment and Darshan within few minutes still they didn't have any gratitude towards the lord Venkateshwara Swamy. But the common devotee who spends hours and days to get Darshan crying helplessly for the Swamy. It's better to trust the common devotee than Supreme Court chief. When court support criminal activities it may save the criminals but lost it's credibility.
Present bench hearing Laddu matter may have to change as one of the Judges appeared on behalf of Jagan previously so he should say NOT BEFORE ME. Comments made by AP CM before are based on NDDB test report.
The SC remained silent in the following cases.
1.When allegations made through media owned by then CM on PINK DIAMOND and Under ground treasures in 'Laddu potu' ( allegedly blamed CBN by then Govt)
2. Naarasura Raktha Charitra widely published shamelessly by the media owned by Jagan
3.when CBN was arrested and jailed 53 days by then CM witoout evidences.
Now same SC is admolishing present CM for his commitment to restore sanctity of Prassdam at TTD.
So, SC must honour the sentiments of HINDU DEVOTEES including judges of HCs & SC who keep visiting on protocol.
Courts, in what direction they take up the matter and how fast they solve it is not known. If Govt also reluctant on solving the issue, who will protect the interests of devotees?
Tackling the issue by CM and Govt can not be attributed to politicisation. If so, SC would have interfered when Non - Hindus were made trust members, chairman, EO and other Officials amidst protests from devotees.
Supreme Court lawyers and chief justice families get VIP treatment and Darshan within few minutes still they didn't have any gratitude towards the lord Venkateshwara Swamy.
But the common devotee who spends hours and days to get Darshan crying helplessly for the Swamy.
It's better to trust the common devotee than Supreme Court chief.
When court support criminal activities it may save the criminals but lost it's credibility.
సిటింగ్ జడ్జి గారితో విచారణ చేస్తే కాస్తాయి నా నమ్మకం ఉంది
Cbi, కి నిబద్దత లేదు మోదీ pm గా ఉన్నంతవరకు
Present bench hearing Laddu matter may have to change as one of the Judges appeared on behalf of Jagan previously so he should say NOT BEFORE ME. Comments made by AP CM before are based on NDDB test report.
మా కిట్టు బాబు సలహాలు తీస్కోండి
బతినులు అమ్ముకోండి
Naa observation venkata Krishna bokka 😢😢😢
మీ టీవీ సుత్తి చాలు ఏమి జ్ఞమార బాబు
Nivuchudaku
THURSDAY SUPREME COURT TELUSTADI ANDARI KUTRALU INCLUDING YELLOW MEDIAS KUTANTRALU
Jagan dabbulu Baga Pani chesindi