MyHeritage actively steals genealogy info generated by free services, sometimes even trying to sell you ancestral info that you yourself found while doing hard research on another platform. Per a user on Reddit who visited their offices a year or two back, the company is based out of a "boiler room" style office. It's also been said that, as soon as the company has your contact information, they'll hound, call, and pester users for more money.
Wouldn't it have been more practical to invade using cargo ships and converted civilian airliners? They would appear as standard vessels and can carry enormous quantities of men and supplies.
Just found this channel and thanks for all the laughs. Analyst here, and the Russian sub thumbnail baited me in. I should say, now that the rest of the world can see how pathetic Russian war machines are nothing more than a Dollar General(a cheap store for poor people in America) to equate their projects. I really wished they tried to build any of these subs. Cutting to the good part: would one of these subs actually make it to our shores? No. 😅😂 If anyone is alarmed by these projects, rest assured that Russia has destroyed itself internally. Most of their remaining stock has been depleted in Ukraine. If they can recover fiscally, it will be decades before they are a threat to others...and by others, NATO countries, not former Soviet states. It was great for you to deliver this without laughing the entire time.
Project 621 was intended to carry T-34s, not T-35s. The T-35 is a failed multi-turreted heavy tank from the 1930s whereas the T-34 was a widely successful medium tank which would've been much more suited given its size and smaller crew.
IJN cruiser submarines like Type-B1were carrying scout planes since 1940s, they even made 3 x I-400 Class carrier submarine carrying 3 x large fighter bombers..
@@MichaelBailey-y1d And the Japanese should be Buying the British a beer... Check out the British M-Class Submarine. M1 (1918) = 305mm Battleship gun, M2 (1925) = Aircraft Carrier. On that note... @FoundAndExplained... there's a unique video for you. Few have talked about it in detail.
So todays video we put a ton of work into! it took some very talented people many weeks to make and I hope you appreciate it :) thanks so much for watching!
These aren't science fiction. They are just big underwater cargo ships. all the tech needed for this existed and in fact Japan had something like this only a little smaller for aircraft.
Oh if life were only so simple. You also need money, lots and lots of money which neither the Soviets, and definitely not the Russians have. The US could theoretically build an armed spaceship that can fly to Mars, however coming up with the several trillion is the tricky part.
Well, an underwater landing ship, while perfectly feasible, was never built for various reasons, so a scenario in which it was built would be fiction, and it would be a piece of technology, therefore falling under the category "science fiction." Perhaps you mean that the design wouldn't be especially futuristic, since it would be perfectly feasible with the technology of the day. But science fiction does not have to be futuristic.
World In Conflict (1:03) and Freedom Fighters. two games that pull from this "what if" concept, one storming Seattle and the other NYC, with these massive transports. the opening of Freedom Fighters with these subs emerging and the soviet chorus singing was phenomenal.
USA had a submarine "Project Conform" at about the same time. It has gone more into stealth direction. Some of the futuristic projects by France are going in this direction too. Would be nice to see something about this kind of submarines here.
Pretty sure they can start them when the doors are open and after the troops are ashore. Not like they are going to be landing under fire... it's meant for a stealth landing
@@Kraken_Mybutt This design is not possible, as someone who works on subs i can tell you this design is a flop. It says 700 crew, with all that load there inst enough room to fit that many people, you'd need a submarine that like at least a quarter to half a mile feet long. Plus you wouldn't start the tanks in compartment because the fumes would literally just kill the sailors, you couldn't expel that much contaminated air while under the surface. Besides this cant be a stealth mission, the size of this sub and the propulsion would be so fucking loud.
@@Jeremy-su5yq fair enough. But no need to carry vehicles... the Belgorod is already 600 feet long and the US loses track of it all the time. They could fit a whole lot of soldiers in that.
@@Kraken_Mybutt The Belgorod is built for ~100 submariners. And that’s to keep the submarine operational. It can’t carry more than a couple fully geared soldiers. It’s just not designed to.
It is not a horrible idea but landings are limited to place where they could off load. Today this could be done with Troops, light vehicles and drones. It would allow a amphibious operation while other areas were invaded at the same time. Granted any target would need to be highly distracted and blinded to miss such an invasion.
they'd be wiped out en-mass. 480 troops even multiplied by 50 subs could not form a survivable beachhead. US mil aircraft would obliterate them and they would have no defense against that. Air DOMINANCE REQUIRED to make such amphibious landing
@@Marcus-p5i5s it depends on a lot of factors but probably not as far as I know no country has D-Day style Coastal defenses or even military bases that are significantly fortified so this would be a sneak attack weapon that could easily push into a number of areas such as ports airfields industrial zones etcetera and as we see the Russians are not opposed to losing massive amounts of numbers of people
@@ChristopherSloanetoday those types of defenses aren't needed in the USA. There is no nation nor even ANY combination of countries that can put enough air power, sea power and supply lines in place to successfully land anywhere on the US mainland. Not even Hawaii or Alaska
@@Marcus-p5i5s yeah guy since I served in the military for 8 years and I might not know everything I'm just going to disappoint you right now and tell you that America is not a fortress and given the right conditions anybody could put troops anywhere on anybody's land in a matter of 12 hours it just depends on how much you're willing to risk to do it
@@ChristopherSloaneLMAO! No, you don't much of ANYTHING about amphibious assaults against such an opponent. Also auto fail for argumentum ab auctoritate
I think the missions of these subs can be found in the book, Red Storm Rising where instead of subs, civilian ships masquerading as US ones but filled with paratroopers in the inside.
@@datadavisno the Soviet Airborne troops were used because they were an elite unit. They came ashore on hover craft and easily overran the (Company or maybe it was a battalion) US Marines on Iceland. The base had also been hit very hard by cruise missiles. I do wonder what the status of Soviet Naval Infantry was in the 1980’s and why they were not used in the novel.
Few and under equipped. The Russian (and by extension Soviet) Navy and everything related to it has always been poorly trained and funded (with the exception of it's Soviet era submarine fleet).
I knew when I was 10 that I wasn't crazy for building Lego™ amphibious assault submarines! Planes included, top was the flight deck with a sealed hangar below, but with a smaller capacity than a regular aircraft carrier. It was awesome.
Not going to lie. Of all the projects that I've seen on this channel, I'd say this is one of the few that could actually work with a bit of modern-day reworking!
Popular Mechanics did a few articles on conceptual transport submarines, including one back in the 00s on a similar infantry carrier submarine. I think they called it the Commando Attack Sub, and it was designed to carry Marines in its big, bloated body and deploy fast attack boats to get them to shore.
Even as an ex soldier I find it strange warring another country. I don't want to invade, harm or take away another family's lifestyle. Also who am I to judge another person's culture. . In fact I should check it out and see their point of view and learn something
I love the Boarding Torpedo from Warhammer 40 000. For those that dont know its a armored troop transporter that has Space Marines in it. This is fired at a enemey ship and the troops disembark and are used to fight in the space ship and try to take out the captian and the bridge controling the ship.
This is what I call a great video 🤌 Cool invention, good pacing, great structure, awesome graphics (no "whatever happend"), the whole package 👌 As for the ultimate "Sub-Carrier" video, I definitely recommend 👉 It's 30min of epic 3D, sci-fi level super submarines, that somebody actually tried to build👌👌👌
I’m honestly surprised they have never made giant land based or submarine destroyer/aircraft carriers. Massive and slow, but built to just be almost invincible.
How would it create mines? Was it supposed to have an onboard munitions factory? Maybe it would have been more efficient to just carry a store of mines?
I'd imagine that such a super-sub would be extremely noisy, and easily picked up on sonar. Plus, a sub that big, probably couldn't dive that deep compared to other subs. The long the sub is, the harder it is to make a hull that can resist pressure laterally.
It would have been very impractical to have submarine like the 717 but not gonna lie if I was on a beach and I saw that submarine intentionally beat itself, I would be shitting bricks
This is a great film. But I do wonder about the practicalities. Not just in finding appropriate landing approaches but the fact your still going to need a serious follow-up force close behind, bringing up logistics, exploitation forces etc. But a very interesting idea!
The data on the US one should be declassified, however I recall hearing about this recently. The US Started an effort to build an undersea aircraft carrier in WWII, but it missed the war and they couldn't figure out the hatch, but they kept working on it as a troop transport but determined it wasn't worth it. So they opted to abandon it in favor surface ships because they figured it would be too big to be practical. But they do use it for marines and seal teams.
Especially given the absolutely appalling safety record of Soviet/Russian submarines, even when they don't have whole battalions of troops and all their ammo onboard
How about this! In the Robotech universe, there was a colossal ship called the SLV-111 Daedalus, a Beachmaster-class submersible assault landing vessel (roughly as huge as the Mega-Ark from 2012!), capable of carrying up to 150 Destroid units to the battlefield, the Daedalus later became the right arm unit for the SDF-1's modular transformation.
USA has underwater detection systems around it. So submarines approaching it would most likely be detected. Noise the submarine makes underwater would be enough alone to get detected.
All this thing is missing is a nuclear capable main rail cannon that when stowed is part of an aircraft runway. 1 million lives lost to save ten million.
Dude, you completely missed IJA cargo submarine force consist of Type-3 'Maru - Yu' boats, design to transport 23 tons of freight & 40 troops, nearly 400 planned but 38 went out of production into action, you cannot miss this part of history when talk about cargo submarines.
I mean, it sou ds good, but a couple factors come up against this design immediately- Amphibious landing craft have a crazy small amount of draft, whereas Subs are the model of deep draft. Also, can you imagine trying to clean/scrub and or generate the amount of breathing air required for over 700 people?
@@kalebthehistorian5928 Who, Scott Ritter the twice convicted child diddler? Or Elon Muskovite going through his middle-life crysis? The cesspool is large and a couple of Lord Haw Haws fiercely supporting Russia’s invasion won’t change anything
@@kalebthehistorian5928A war intended to last a couple of weeks has stretched on for years. Perhaps you and other analysts believe it’s hopeless, but it’s gone far worse for Russia than they originally expected, and still haven’t won.
Love found and explained and want us to make more videos like this? Then check out our sponsor MyHeritage + 14-day free trial
bit.ly/FoundandExplained
MyHeritage actively steals genealogy info generated by free services, sometimes even trying to sell you ancestral info that you yourself found while doing hard research on another platform. Per a user on Reddit who visited their offices a year or two back, the company is based out of a "boiler room" style office. It's also been said that, as soon as the company has your contact information, they'll hound, call, and pester users for more money.
We are all fail junkies. Please do a video on the politics and logistic fails behind the Australian SSN-AUKUS submarine program.
Wouldn't it have been more practical to invade using cargo ships and converted civilian airliners? They would appear as standard vessels and can carry enormous quantities of men and supplies.
Just found this channel and thanks for all the laughs. Analyst here, and the Russian sub thumbnail baited me in. I should say, now that the rest of the world can see how pathetic Russian war machines are nothing more than a Dollar General(a cheap store for poor people in America) to equate their projects. I really wished they tried to build any of these subs. Cutting to the good part: would one of these subs actually make it to our shores? No. 😅😂 If anyone is alarmed by these projects, rest assured that Russia has destroyed itself internally. Most of their remaining stock has been depleted in Ukraine. If they can recover fiscally, it will be decades before they are a threat to others...and by others, NATO countries, not former Soviet states. It was great for you to deliver this without laughing the entire time.
A Bendigo lad.
Sounds like granddad was a bend and go to by the sounds of
Project 621 was intended to carry T-34s, not T-35s. The T-35 is a failed multi-turreted heavy tank from the 1930s whereas the T-34 was a widely successful medium tank which would've been much more suited given its size and smaller crew.
Thanks for the correction
Uses T-34/85 3D models, writes T-35. 🤦♂️.
I caught that too.
@@CAP198462to be fair post war the only T-34 variant worth anything was the T-34/85
@@jameson1239 i mean that goes for basically any tank with a lot of gradually improved variants, the newest will be the best
The T-34 was the most mass produced tank of WW2. That's the only thing it had going for it. Well, that and German stupidity.
Fun fact: there are more planes in the ocean than submarines in the sky.
that IS a fun fact
Not if you look at aircraft as submarines that can fly.
Planes are basically submarines because theyre cylinder shaped
What a surprise!
@@realherobrine5636basically both are pressurized and air locked so yeah
12:00 please tell me im not the only one who hears him say "717" funny
Sounds like he accidentally said "171" and then dubbed it over
@@HugoLumanthats it.
you aren't..
@@HugoLumansounded more like a stitching of the audio kinda like YTPs.
Me too 😂
Maybe a Mix Misstak? 😅
The fact that one of the designs is called "Project 626" itches that Disney movie part of my brain.
It had me in Stitches.
It's not that special to be honest, they named a good deal of their naval projects "Project #"
Jumba describes his "evil experiment" it with his Russian accent.
[Palpatine has entered the chat]
Japan: It's crazy to think we can fit a plane into a submarine😬😬😬
USSR: hold my vodka👹👹👹
I think it's the Russians who should be buying the IJN a beer! Check out the WW2 Japanese submarine class I-400, which carried 3 Aichi M6As.
Hold my palinka
The difference is that the Japanese Imperial Navy actually built and deployed submarine aircraft carriers; the Russians just dreamed…
IJN cruiser submarines like Type-B1were carrying scout planes since 1940s, they even made 3 x I-400 Class carrier submarine carrying 3 x large fighter bombers..
@@MichaelBailey-y1d And the Japanese should be Buying the British a beer...
Check out the British M-Class Submarine. M1 (1918) = 305mm Battleship gun, M2 (1925) = Aircraft Carrier.
On that note... @FoundAndExplained... there's a unique video for you. Few have talked about it in detail.
So todays video we put a ton of work into! it took some very talented people many weeks to make and I hope you appreciate it :) thanks so much for watching!
Thank you for the effort, I really appreciate it. 👍
Looks great!
Looks like something out of the C&C Red Alert Series.
Please don't remind me of those good old days ..... EA has ruined C&C
About as practical too.
The Russian Ukrainian war is just the first level of the upcoming RA game.
Freedom Fighters.
literally opens with these subs.
That's no accident. "What if the crazy Cold War projects actually worked?" is the fundamental premise of Red Alert.
These aren't science fiction. They are just big underwater cargo ships. all the tech needed for this existed and in fact Japan had something like this only a little smaller for aircraft.
Oh if life were only so simple. You also need money, lots and lots of money which neither the Soviets, and definitely not the Russians have. The US could theoretically build an armed spaceship that can fly to Mars, however coming up with the several trillion is the tricky part.
Japans subs were a lot smaller than this monster.
Well, an underwater landing ship, while perfectly feasible, was never built for various reasons, so a scenario in which it was built would be fiction, and it would be a piece of technology, therefore falling under the category "science fiction." Perhaps you mean that the design wouldn't be especially futuristic, since it would be perfectly feasible with the technology of the day. But science fiction does not have to be futuristic.
World In Conflict (1:03) and Freedom Fighters.
two games that pull from this "what if" concept, one storming Seattle and the other NYC, with these massive transports.
the opening of Freedom Fighters with these subs emerging and the soviet chorus singing was phenomenal.
Such and amazing game! I wished Massive was around and made a sequel to WiC. The expansion Soviet Assault was great too.
@@joshuanida5457 "Slitherine Games" says hello with "Broken Arrow"
The ballast tanks would have to be huge on these for it to be able to submerge after unloading its cargo.
Basically a real life Ulysses but without the mini submarine pods
Why are submarines getting crazier and crazier with every episode on this channel 😅
Assault submarine. That phrase is chilling.
USA had a submarine "Project Conform" at about the same time. It has gone more into stealth direction. Some of the futuristic projects by France are going in this direction too.
Would be nice to see something about this kind of submarines here.
I've seen T-72s on startup. You want to put them in an airtight container? RIP, sailors.
Pretty sure they can start them when the doors are open and after the troops are ashore. Not like they are going to be landing under fire... it's meant for a stealth landing
have you seen them turret toss though?
@@Kraken_Mybutt This design is not possible, as someone who works on subs i can tell you this design is a flop. It says 700 crew, with all that load there inst enough room to fit that many people, you'd need a submarine that like at least a quarter to half a mile feet long. Plus you wouldn't start the tanks in compartment because the fumes would literally just kill the sailors, you couldn't expel that much contaminated air while under the surface. Besides this cant be a stealth mission, the size of this sub and the propulsion would be so fucking loud.
@@Jeremy-su5yq fair enough. But no need to carry vehicles... the Belgorod is already 600 feet long and the US loses track of it all the time. They could fit a whole lot of soldiers in that.
@@Kraken_Mybutt The Belgorod is built for ~100 submariners. And that’s to keep the submarine operational.
It can’t carry more than a couple fully geared soldiers. It’s just not designed to.
It is not a horrible idea but landings are limited to place where they could off load. Today this could be done with Troops, light vehicles and drones. It would allow a amphibious operation while other areas were invaded at the same time. Granted any target would need to be highly distracted and blinded to miss such an invasion.
they'd be wiped out en-mass. 480 troops even multiplied by 50 subs could not form a survivable beachhead. US mil aircraft would obliterate them and they would have no defense against that. Air DOMINANCE REQUIRED to make such amphibious landing
@@Marcus-p5i5s it depends on a lot of factors but probably not as far as I know no country has D-Day style Coastal defenses or even military bases that are significantly fortified so this would be a sneak attack weapon that could easily push into a number of areas such as ports airfields industrial zones etcetera and as we see the Russians are not opposed to losing massive amounts of numbers of people
@@ChristopherSloanetoday those types of defenses aren't needed in the USA. There is no nation nor even ANY combination of countries that can put enough air power, sea power and supply lines in place to successfully land anywhere on the US mainland. Not even Hawaii or Alaska
@@Marcus-p5i5s yeah guy since I served in the military for 8 years and I might not know everything I'm just going to disappoint you right now and tell you that America is not a fortress and given the right conditions anybody could put troops anywhere on anybody's land in a matter of 12 hours it just depends on how much you're willing to risk to do it
@@ChristopherSloaneLMAO! No, you don't much of ANYTHING about amphibious assaults against such an opponent. Also auto fail for argumentum ab auctoritate
I was not expecting the Doctor Who clip, but it is very on point for not just this project, but Cold War era thinking in general.
Project 626 realistically would have no way to unload T-34s off that loading ramp as they completely lack neutral steering and cannot turn in place
this is both untrue and also irrelevant
you don't need to neutral steer to turn, and they just have to drive in a straight line in and out
Stop using common sense lol. Biased, pro Russian military people will get upset with you lol 😂
The Project 717 walk-through was sublime! Really dig the music on that. The 3D model panning was excellent work, too.
I think the missions of these subs can be found in the book, Red Storm Rising where instead of subs, civilian ships masquerading as US ones but filled with paratroopers in the inside.
were they gonna parachute from the ships?
The invasion of Texas will be hilarious.
@@datadavisno the Soviet Airborne troops were used because they were an elite unit. They came ashore on hover craft and easily overran the (Company or maybe it was a battalion) US Marines on Iceland. The base had also been hit very hard by cruise missiles.
I do wonder what the status of Soviet Naval Infantry was in the 1980’s and why they were not used in the novel.
Few and under equipped. The Russian (and by extension Soviet) Navy and everything related to it has always been poorly trained and funded (with the exception of it's Soviet era submarine fleet).
I guess this is where Kojima got his inspiration for Arsenal Gear
The vultures have been fed and the world has seen our might. Now, clear the skies.
I knew when I was 10 that I wasn't crazy for building Lego™ amphibious assault submarines! Planes included, top was the flight deck with a sealed hangar below, but with a smaller capacity than a regular aircraft carrier. It was awesome.
Man, does that sub sound like a unit from C&C for surprise attacks. That would be nice ...
They can barely invade their neighbors.
Imagine chilling on the beach and then you see that
I can't wait to see the Bear Transports for the war-bears !
Yes, completely undetectable. Laughes in hydrophone, chuckles in active ping sonar, giggles in sub hunter, hahas in intelligence gathering.
🎶They came through the water in their submarine🎶
🎶Soviet troops packed like sardines🎶
The Big Brother of Submarine Alicorn hahahaha
So cool. Your videos and content is amazing! Please keep the high quality videos coming.
Our enemy’s realized a long time ago that they don’t need to invade, instead they cause chaos from within
At about 20 seconds you say “but what if there was another way” and I immediately thought squarespace.
It's hilarious that the sponsor segment is named "secret chapter"
Not going to lie. Of all the projects that I've seen on this channel, I'd say this is one of the few that could actually work with a bit of modern-day reworking!
Even today, no matter how many troops you land, if you don't supply a permanent stream of supplies
Popular Mechanics did a few articles on conceptual transport submarines, including one back in the 00s on a similar infantry carrier submarine. I think they called it the Commando Attack Sub, and it was designed to carry Marines in its big, bloated body and deploy fast attack boats to get them to shore.
Even as an ex soldier I find it strange warring another country. I don't want to invade, harm or take away another family's lifestyle. Also who am I to judge another person's culture. . In fact I should check it out and see their point of view and learn something
This is such a good video!
Thanks for watching!
I love the Boarding Torpedo from Warhammer 40 000. For those that dont know its a armored troop transporter that has Space Marines in it. This is fired at a enemey ship and the troops disembark and are used to fight in the space ship and try to take out the captian and the bridge controling the ship.
Next up drop pod tech lol
This Idea is just so dumb...Even if you got on Shore, you needed hundreds of these Things.
To carry enough Troops, and to supply these Troops.
Yeah this had no chance to ever succeed
“717!” 😂 12:02
It said 171 and had to cut it out hahah
This is what I call a great video 🤌
Cool invention, good pacing, great structure, awesome graphics (no "whatever happend"), the whole package 👌
As for the ultimate "Sub-Carrier" video, I definitely recommend 👉
It's 30min of epic 3D, sci-fi level super submarines, that somebody actually tried to build👌👌👌
This seems like a high tech movie intro...awesome
Glad you like it!
I’m honestly surprised they have never made giant land based or submarine destroyer/aircraft carriers. Massive and slow, but built to just be almost invincible.
I love UA-camrs like you and mustard
You forget to inlude Gergia into USSR at 1:39
I love these to show up as an enemy in an Ace Combat game, I can imagine some pretty good setpiece battles around the concept.
Those Soviet invasion subs are a James Bond movie's dream come true!
I mean, if you need top secret documents, best place to go is the War Thunder forums apparently
How would it create mines? Was it supposed to have an onboard munitions factory? Maybe it would have been more efficient to just carry a store of mines?
3:36 Russia wanted armored cores, but somebody mistook it for a design part
I'd imagine that such a super-sub would be extremely noisy, and easily picked up on sonar. Plus, a sub that big, probably couldn't dive that deep compared to other subs. The long the sub is, the harder it is to make a hull that can resist pressure laterally.
I can’t imagine the logistical nightmare of feeding hundreds of troops in a tiny metal tube
Turns out giant subs aren't quiet. :)
Huge reason why Japanese I-400 class cruiser subs were scrapped immediately after the war to avoid the technology falling into Soviets hands.
An invasion of armies can be resisted, but not an idea whose time has come.
We could never learn to be brave and patient if there were only joy in the world.
Submarines are so fascinating. You think the german type 21 would make an appearance in this channel?
Haha that doctor who scene turns out perfect for this
Without passion man is a mere latent force and possibility, like the flint which awaits the shock of the iron before it can give forth its spark.
"621...why are you underwater theres not any coral there get back to work"
6:45 348 tons is not equal to 3,480 tons
I have a question when do we get the long promised MiG 105 that was said to come „very soon“ when please ?
the water sim was actually quite bonkers, awesome rendering sims
This looks like some of Red Alert 2 unit. Would it blast hell match from massive speakers
Very entertaining and informative. Had no idea about these vessels until now.
It would have been very impractical to have submarine like the 717 but not gonna lie if I was on a beach and I saw that submarine intentionally beat itself, I would be shitting bricks
@foundAndExplained I love your videos and hope you don't quit keep up the good work
0:40 Alaska: 👀 and something is wrong with your map bro 1:25
so how much larger (longer) than the typhoon was this
This is basically Arsenal Gear from Metal Gear Solid, just without nukes
That right there was a violation 2:44 😭💀. At least you tried,
I think they should be reminded about their Cuban Missile Crisis.
This is a great film. But I do wonder about the practicalities. Not just in finding appropriate landing approaches but the fact your still going to need a serious follow-up force close behind, bringing up logistics, exploitation forces etc. But a very interesting idea!
I think you meant 59,000 tonns of displacement
The 717 just reminds me of 'the pentagon wars'. On paper, it can do everything! In practice, I imagine it would be a nightmare to live and work aboard
Knowing how well their one aircraft carrier is working out something tells me this never would have made it out the harbor.
The data on the US one should be declassified, however I recall hearing about this recently. The US Started an effort to build an undersea aircraft carrier in WWII, but it missed the war and they couldn't figure out the hatch, but they kept working on it as a troop transport but determined it wasn't worth it. So they opted to abandon it in favor surface ships because they figured it would be too big to be practical. But they do use it for marines and seal teams.
The US version of this and its test beds would make a great video. You could also do something on the US's submarine tanker design.
Wait … the torpedos fired backward?
Look like really expensive coffins.
Especially given the absolutely appalling safety record of Soviet/Russian submarines, even when they don't have whole battalions of troops and all their ammo onboard
How have I never heard of this
1:25 Why is georgia not a part of Soviet Union on the map?
Hey the next Submarine video you could make is about the IJN I-400 from WW2. It be cool to see you do a video on it.
We’d all love to see them try
Wolverines!
How about this! In the Robotech universe, there was a colossal ship called the SLV-111 Daedalus, a Beachmaster-class submersible assault landing vessel (roughly as huge as the Mega-Ark from 2012!), capable of carrying up to 150 Destroid units to the battlefield, the Daedalus later became the right arm unit for the SDF-1's modular transformation.
6:45
At 348 tons???
But your graphics states as 3,480 tons!!!
10x T-35 seems wrong...those were huge ''landship'' tanks...probably meant T-34
USA has underwater detection systems around it. So submarines approaching it would most likely be detected. Noise the submarine makes underwater would be enough alone to get detected.
Nope
Tbh this wasnt as a stupid idea as many would think I think this is pretty darn smart
All this thing is missing is a nuclear capable main rail cannon that when stowed is part of an aircraft runway. 1 million lives lost to save ten million.
Don't worry, Operation: Infinite Walrus and it's greatest soldier, Bill Dauterive will stop those submarines from coming over the Arctic.
Its a shame they fave him that evil placebo drug.
Man give it a railgun and it’s the Alicorn from AC7
Dude, you completely missed IJA cargo submarine force consist of Type-3 'Maru - Yu' boats, design to transport 23 tons of freight & 40 troops, nearly 400 planned but 38 went out of production into action, you cannot miss this part of history when talk about cargo submarines.
Did they finally patch the screen doors on these tubs??
I mean, it sou ds good, but a couple factors come up against this design immediately- Amphibious landing craft have a crazy small amount of draft, whereas Subs are the model of deep draft. Also, can you imagine trying to clean/scrub and or generate the amount of breathing air required for over 700 people?
It sounds a bit funny when you realize Russia can’t even win in its own backyard, let alone reach continents away
The Russians aren't the Soviet Union, you numpty, but both they and the Ukraine were once apart of it.
USSR is not = russia
Define "Can't Win" when pretty much everyone except Ukraine and certain "Experts" has basically said its hopless at this point.
@@kalebthehistorian5928 Who, Scott Ritter the twice convicted child diddler? Or Elon Muskovite going through his middle-life crysis? The cesspool is large and a couple of Lord Haw Haws fiercely supporting Russia’s invasion won’t change anything
@@kalebthehistorian5928A war intended to last a couple of weeks has stretched on for years. Perhaps you and other analysts believe it’s hopeless, but it’s gone far worse for Russia than they originally expected, and still haven’t won.
Before that could even
happen, they would have
to get them to WORK 1st
🤣🤣🤣and NOT LOSE
IT the PROCESS🤣🤣🤣