@Die Cast Racing with Von How are you going to handle the embarrassment when none of that happens? Biden is incredibly Centrist. Even the few actual Socialists aren't seeking to overturn Capitalism. Trump, on the other hand, has had nothing but praise for Russia and China.
Im not sure if you read all the comments but i think your show is great and i like how you take the time to really break down the machinations of the judicial branch and especially appreciate your efforts to remain centered and avoid applying partisan spin of either direction. I find your videos to be enlightening and educating . fairness honesty and very well informed are the impressions i am left with after a cursory evaluation of surface level character traits. I look forward to following your work in the months and years ahead.
The decision that should follow is for the states to have delegates go to vote however there hearts feel is best to defend and uphold the constitution of the United States of America.
@@zephirol4638 Correction, it's now a federal national issue affecting other states and election standards in relation to equal protection clause, constitutionally, unless of course the defendant states have electorally and politically succeeded from the union.
Why refuse the hearing of evidence, or auditing of machines? It should be standard practice! It's the surest way to substantiate or dismiss voter, state, or 3rd party fraud or interference!
@@hubbabubba5446 Eh what? Then why won't judges, SOS, and election officials permit signature audits, forensic audits, and hear and dispute evidence. Surely if this is an attack on election integrity than those things would prove the results of the election are valid and that Trumptards are lying or deluded.
R&R thank you for your educational and fair analysis of the law - keep up the great work of sharing court facts and details. I only hope that UA-cam doesn't censor your valuable content.
PENN Legislature should file AMICUS brief ALONG WITH Texas, because their citizens were harmed by the unconstitutional acts of their own Governor and Secty o State as well !!!!
How can Fulton County, GA residents legally prevent Ralph Jones Sr, the Voter Registration Manager from being involved in January's Senate runoff on Jan 5? His son, Jones Jr is running Warnock for Senator's campaign? This is a conflict of interest.
I like your comment in the beginning about judges not particularly interested in justice. Those of us gentle loving fathers who are continually disrespected in family court know this viscerally.
@@horowizard you think biden got more votes than lord Obama did ? Im telling you it just is not possible, moreover how can you think China Joe is going to act in America's favor concerning anything to do with China. I know the left loves to screech how corrupt Trump is, (as of yet still unable or unwilling to produce anything that even vaguely resembles credible or for that matter even circumstantial evidence. BTW, reruns of rachel maddow hardly qualify as either.) the problem you and i are faced with is that the political class have driven wedges between America's cotizens, effectively dividing the population. quite cleverly i might add but it is not to benifit the constituents of either side look at them, destroying small businesses across the country they are creating a class system of all poor some rich. Dems and Repubs cant even bring themselves to agree on putting money in the pockets of those they wont let work. This covid , yeah yeah tragic if you are under 70 yrs old , chances you survive , no bs, 99.4% not even close to any sane reason to slam on the brakes for the economic engine of the world. We both have the same needs and wants if we stopped being on either of their sides and decided to be on the same side we would to get to reap the benefits we have coming because our grandparents fought to keep US Constitution as the law governing this FREE NATION. They want to get rid of it because it guarantees you and me the right to pursue happiness. Dont get me wrong, i understand that pursuit can be challenging but if there is anyplace in the world where your personal efforts can overcome situations like being born into poverty, or even being without a mom and a dad or gtandparents that step up to do that job, still it's. FREEDOM US CONSTITUTION STYLE AMERICA. this cheat of an election is a clear signal they despise the fairness of our elections because they cant force their will on free people so they are done with fair play .and playing by the rules and neither you nor i are beneficiaries .this is really about them thinking that because they have half the people theyve lied to beleiving them( once again) that they can do anything they want to the other half and. If you wait til theyve secured power and then start to see what there terrible plan is and speak up against the horrors you too will be crushed. It happened to start with the same basic plays back in NAZI Germany . if they succeed in this effort there will be no more FREE AMERICA to beat back the tyrants this time.
The truth is that what the United States Supreme Court just did was refusal to grant Mike Kelly’s application for injunctive relief, which in effect would have put on hold the certification of Pennsylvania electors by the Governor and Secretary of State before the end of “Safe Harbor” deadline of December 8 as required by the Constitution. However, the substantive case challenging ACT 77 which permitted universal mail-in ballots is still pending before the Supreme Court on Merit.
If voting in other precincts was going to be an issue in Arizona, then why did they set polling places up just anywhere, and say that you could just vote where it was convenient? Sounds like a set-up at the outset.
John Gary: I don't know. I just know that before this year we had polling places in our specific precincts if you voted in person. This year was a first, that you could go vote wherever it was convenient in person. That was for the primaries and the election itself. But, we have been voting via mail-in ballot for over 20 years. But, since I wanted my vote to be scanned in to count for sure, voted in person. However they made us use Sharpies, and those votes were thrown out because they bleed through, so my vote didn't count. Also, he was saying that Arizona was going to throw the votes out where they were not offered in the correct precinct. But, it wasn't set up that way this year. Very puzzling ...
How are these Secretsry of states allowed to override their legislatures? Talk about opening "Pandora's box". Just let the SOS decide which laws they will follow and which ones they dont? Then make up their own rules? What the?
@@margarethawaters5792 For Texas to file a SCOTUS claim against another state(s) the claim must fall within this Supreme Court’s constitutional and statutory subject-matter jurisdiction. “Controversies between two or more States.” U.S. CONST. art. III, § 2, “The Supreme Court shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction of all controversies between two or more States.” TEXAS ARGUES THAT THESE STATE ELECTIONS ADVERSELY EFFECTED THEIR ELECTION WITH NO EXPLANATION AS TO WHY. IT WAS ADDED JUST TO CHECK THE BOX. TEXAS FAILS TO MEET THIS BAR. THIS IS NOT A CONTROVERSY BETWEEN STATES.
What happened with the man arrested after having been caught with hard drives computer etc and was he tapped into the recorder's office in Maricopa county?
If there's any kind of justice & accountability hopefully he's wearing a pink jumpsuit eating moldy balogna sandwiches in Maricopa county jail at the very least. Im going to research your question and update my findings here. Hold the line Patriots
the constitutional violation on election procedures needs to be handled by the federal court when the local politicians do not come to an agreement. is it not?
Actually, the SCOTUS wanted to use their time more wisely. The Texas case encompasses the issues the Kelly case did. Why hear both cases when the Texas case covers the Kelly case. They went for the bigger case that was more outcome determinative. Don't read anything into the rejection of the Kelly case. It will be addressed in the Texas case.
The other argument should have been; For every unconstitutional and illegal vote thats cast, it nullified one constitutional and legal vote and that on it's face disenfranchised legal voters 🗳
All these lawsuits seem to be self defeating. You sent one inconsequential lawsuit to the supreme court that set you up for all the lawsuits to be dismissed.
@Rowdy Gaines Yeah, Yeah keep drinking the Koolaid for your Severe Case of "TDS" if SCOTUS lets that happen then we will no longer have a Country and that will end in a Civil War. But that's exactly what you Leftists want!! Hahaha Good Luck 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 P.S Put my name at the Top of yours and AOC's list Hahaha 🤣😂🤣😂
Can the Secretary of States and state Supreme Court justices who have acted un-constitutionally be impeached and removed from office quickly in GA, PA, WN, MI? I am Australian so don't understand how un constitutional acts can be tolerated.
Lol, It sure is! You DO have to rub it maybe a lil hard for a bit AND the GENIE WILL pop out... Bigger than life! We The People control the levers of the Great & Mighty OZ 👍❤️✌️
It’s difficult to understand what, and why, some of the courts are making their decisions. Thanks for talking us them. However, you don’t have to be a rocket scientist to see what caused all the chaos in the system; you just have to be a thinking human over the age of puberty. Thanks for keeping us informed regarding the courts.🙋🏼♀️
@@kevitawhite-leslie4388Why is having to show an ID suppression? Or having to show proof of residence? These are basic requirements that every developed country has.
@@VictorNewman201 1. Google it - literally 100s of videos explaining it. 2. America is not a developed country. Developed countries are paying their citizens to stay home during a pandemic.
@@JL_Lux nancy pelosi is the reason many americans aren't getting covid compensation.......although her cronies are swimming in it, and she's refusing to help "the little people" unless she gets even more
People are not going to stand for this somebody better do something or they may have war. They cheated in Nevada here too. We have been praying for SCOTUS to save us
@@fidelmercado2621 The only date that matters is January 20th, that's the only day in the Constitution. Everyother date is statute, and merely a guide to help the process run in a smooth and timely manner. Additionally, the so called "Safe Harbour" day explicitly states that "so long as there are no disputes." There are many, Texas dropped a BIG one on the 8th, and several other states have joined them. IT. AIN'T. OVER.
How does the US protect Judges/Senators/Medical Professionals/Scientists/ MS Media Opinion and Producers from outside influence from other countries? What is the Law?
If the courts are shown that people are denied a vote they can go to the lower courts again, surely. How many votes can can be denied before it is counted?
If you do some research, in one year back when the Clintons were in state politics (probably about 40/50 yrs ago) 3 people on their staff mysteriously “died” when they got too close to a fraudulent truth.
2:24:37 I have zero respect for FDR when I found out he made it “illegal” for citizens to own physical gold except for 4 or 5oz, 1933. Then he ordered for people to turn in their gold, several months after which he raised the nominal price from $20/oz to $35/oz, devaluing the US dollar (Fed Res debt note) by 75%. Nail in the coffin when Nixon in 1971 took the rest of the world off the gold standard, especially when France’s Charles DeGaulle showed up on CA shores demanding their gold back, starting a run on physical gold in 1965. Unfortunately, many many politicians have sold out the US sovereigns. We’re in economic crisis because the entire financial system for which we work & save is based on Fed Res fiat garbage debt notes, currency. It has NOTHING to do with the “covid” exploitation.
In person ga voters had to show id and have signature match verification befire being able to vote ,that illegal mail in didnt they didnt show id or signature verification. Its treating demographic totally unfair vetting high standards to in person none for mail in. Eqaul protection plus disenfranchisement and deluded votes
From what I understand , the Kelly case was not rejected, the emergency part of it was rejected. So I assume it is still active but could take a long time and still be rejected.
I think its just not wanting to be the ones to overturn what is perceived to be the election results. You could call it cowardice (I do) but it's not necessarily due to blatant corruption.
Uh this doesn’t “happen all the time”. This has almost if not ever happened in Supreme Court history. States just don’t sue each other at the Supreme Court all the time as you portray.
Holly Allen this is new history. This has never happened. Now several states have joined Texas. Technically since this is original jurisdiction you could have live witnesses giving testimony before the Supreme Court. That never happens. Usually that happens in lower courts and the Supreme Court simply decides on the merits. I don’t think we’ll see witnesses here but it would be fascinating...
This is what you call a PERFECT INFORMATIVE REPORT. Congratulations!
Awesome! Excellent that S Dakota joined this suit!! I moved from Michigan to S Dakota......it’s like living in a different country! A GREAT one!
And you have a much prettier and nicer governor too.
Am watching from London England, stay with it please
Greetings from Philadelphia Pennsylvania.
Ive been to London twice. Fabulous.
🇺🇲♥️🇬🇧
I'm in Michigan, registered voter and I received 3 absenctie ballet forms... FRAUD!!!
Thank God for Texas! All Red States should join them!🇺🇸❤️
Love your show. I hope that these states in question do the right thing in the end.
Thanks for the daily show. Watching from Canada
Very grateful for the information and the education. Thanks and God bless you even more.
Thank you for staying informed and timely reporting.
Clear analysis and explanation of what’s going on. Thank you!
Thank you for doing this. Your explanations are greatly appreciated.
God Bless Texas
Thank you for explaining everything so clear. Great job 👍👍👍
Good clarity.. Educating us citizens in processes of USA legal system.
Thank you!
Thank you. I understand more now than before.
May God bless and protect you, your family and organization for your unending support of President Trump and the voiceless Americans.
Tom Nyama
Ghana
Thank you for the thoroughness of your reporting.
I've found this episode to be subpar.
This guy makes law understandable. I feel like i could be a lawyer! Good job
The Supreme Court has the future of this country on their hands.
@Die Cast Racing with Von How are you going to handle the embarrassment when none of that happens? Biden is incredibly Centrist. Even the few actual Socialists aren't seeking to overturn Capitalism. Trump, on the other hand, has had nothing but praise for Russia and China.
Im not sure if you read all the comments but i think your show is great and i like how you take the time to really break down the machinations of the judicial branch and especially appreciate your efforts to remain centered and avoid applying partisan spin of either direction. I find your videos to be enlightening and educating . fairness honesty and very well informed are the impressions i am left with after a cursory evaluation of surface level character traits. I look forward to following your work in the months and years ahead.
I live in Atlanta. So basically we’re getting screwed again for the runoff unless this is fixed?!
IMO. If Scotus rules in favor of Texas. The Senate runoff should not be necessary.
The decision that should follow is for the states to have delegates go to vote however there hearts feel is best to defend and uphold the constitution of the United States of America.
@@M3LTUP
Why wouldn’t it be necessary? They are not part of the lawsuit.
@@aethelwolfe3539
I think it will go to the house if Texas wins.
@@M3LTUP Texas doesn't have a chance. The Supreme Court is not going to allow one state to dictate how other states govern. Its a bad precedent.
Super!
Texas is the better lawsuit it covered all the 6 states and Ala. Ark. la. and SC joined Texas today in lawsuit
Link, please. I can't corroborate your claim anywhere.
@@Johnbobon
Black Sheep Comic Collector
20 minutes ago
@S B also Kentucky, South and North Carolina! Louisiana Arkansas Florida etc
@@jasonsherman89 did you forget the link?
It's not, because it's not a state to state issue. It will get insta denied.
@@zephirol4638 Correction, it's now a federal national issue affecting other states and election standards in relation to equal protection clause, constitutionally, unless of course the defendant states have electorally and politically succeeded from the union.
Thank God for Texas
Thanks so much for this channel! I so much look forward to learning about the law while watching your handsome face everyday! 😍
Dreaming to join Texas team, mr. PARROT!
Why refuse the hearing of evidence, or auditing of machines? It should be standard practice! It's the surest way to substantiate or dismiss voter, state, or 3rd party fraud or interference!
Because it’s not about election fraud; it’s about undermining the result and everyone except Trumptards understands that.
@@hubbabubba5446 Eh what? Then why won't judges, SOS, and election officials permit signature audits, forensic audits, and hear and dispute evidence. Surely if this is an attack on election integrity than those things would prove the results of the election are valid and that Trumptards are lying or deluded.
@@hubbabubba5446 it is about undermining the CROOKED result. i do wish to undermine that, but not for trump. i just happen to prefer the truth
Wow, so you mainstream media sheeple really believe that all these accusation came from thin air? Lol...incredible.
R&R thank you for your educational and fair analysis of the law - keep up the great work of sharing court facts and details. I only hope that UA-cam doesn't censor your valuable content.
Contact your State Attorney General tell them to join the Texas lawsuit, Our last gasp
Great analysis! Let’s hope SCOTUS takes the TX case.
PENN Legislature should file AMICUS brief ALONG WITH Texas, because their citizens were harmed by the unconstitutional acts of their own Governor and Secty o State as well !!!!
Trump lose soooo no
Thank you.
How can Fulton County, GA residents legally prevent Ralph Jones Sr, the Voter Registration Manager from being involved in January's Senate runoff on Jan 5? His son, Jones Jr is running Warnock for Senator's campaign? This is a conflict of interest.
Sue.
Love the new chat format. A lot easier to follow & less distracting. 😊
This is a great show. You sure nuf do talk good! Thanx
yeah, grueler is surprisingly coherent for a fast talker!
Thanks!
oh my going to be hard to wait till monday, have safe travels.
@@profribasmat217 naw the whole country can cry
I like your comment in the beginning about judges not particularly interested in justice. Those of us gentle loving fathers who are continually disrespected in family court know this viscerally.
The Texas lawsuit is outcome determinative which means EVERYTHING.
I finally feel good about this election. Bumbling Biden needs to concede.
In your fuckin' dreams!
@@horowizard you think biden got more votes than lord Obama did ? Im telling you it just is not possible, moreover how can you think China Joe is going to act in America's favor concerning anything to do with China. I know the left loves to screech how corrupt Trump is, (as of yet still unable or unwilling to produce anything that even vaguely resembles credible or for that matter even circumstantial evidence. BTW, reruns of rachel maddow hardly qualify as either.) the problem you and i are faced with is that the political class have driven wedges between America's cotizens, effectively dividing the population. quite cleverly i might add but it is not to benifit the constituents of either side look at them, destroying small businesses across the country they are creating a class system of all poor some rich. Dems and Repubs cant even bring themselves to agree on putting money in the pockets of those they wont let work. This covid , yeah yeah tragic if you are under 70 yrs old , chances you survive , no bs, 99.4% not even close to any sane reason to slam on the brakes for the economic engine of the world. We both have the same needs and wants if we stopped being on either of their sides and decided to be on the same side we would to get to reap the benefits we have coming because our grandparents fought to keep US Constitution as the law governing this FREE NATION. They want to get rid of it because it guarantees you and me the right to pursue happiness. Dont get me wrong, i understand that pursuit can be challenging but if there is anyplace in the world where your personal efforts can overcome situations like being born into poverty, or even being without a mom and a dad or gtandparents that step up to do that job, still it's. FREEDOM US CONSTITUTION STYLE AMERICA. this cheat of an election is a clear signal they despise the fairness of our elections because they cant force their will on free people so they are done with fair play .and playing by the rules and neither you nor i are beneficiaries .this is really about them thinking that because they have half the people theyve lied to beleiving them( once again) that they can do anything they want to the other half and. If you wait til theyve secured power and then start to see what there terrible plan is and speak up against the horrors you too will be crushed. It happened to start with the same basic plays back in NAZI Germany . if they succeed in this effort there will be no more FREE AMERICA to beat back the tyrants this time.
Thank you for the information!
I am fairly new to your show & now listen every morning. Super informative. 👍
The truth is that what the United States Supreme Court just did was refusal to grant Mike Kelly’s application for injunctive relief, which in effect would have put on hold the certification of Pennsylvania electors by the Governor and Secretary of State before the end of “Safe Harbor” deadline of December 8 as required by the Constitution. However, the substantive case challenging ACT 77 which permitted universal mail-in ballots is still pending before the Supreme Court on Merit.
That ..SCOTUS ...Answer ...was Short & Sweet
If voting in other precincts was going to be an issue in Arizona, then why did they set polling places up just anywhere, and say that you could just vote where it was convenient? Sounds like a set-up at the outset.
John Gary: I don't know. I just know that before this year we had polling places in our specific precincts if you voted in person. This year was a first, that you could go vote wherever it was convenient in person. That was for the primaries and the election itself. But, we have been voting via mail-in ballot for over 20 years. But, since I wanted my vote to be scanned in to count for sure, voted in person. However they made us use Sharpies, and those votes were thrown out because they bleed through, so my vote didn't count. Also, he was saying that Arizona was going to throw the votes out where they were not offered in the correct precinct. But, it wasn't set up that way this year. Very puzzling ...
Now I understand what this suit is about, Thanks. We shall se what SCOTUS says & hope I don't have to pull out my firearms!!!
Judge Alito and the Supremes? Lol, I thought it was Diana Ross!
He has a grate falsetto
I thought you had common sense?!
How are these Secretsry of states allowed to override their legislatures? Talk about opening "Pandora's box". Just let the SOS decide which laws they will follow and which ones they dont? Then make up their own rules? What the?
Steven Crowder tested and found that comments help more then likes in the algorithms. I would ask people to comment more than liking
Thanks for the tip.
Love your channel! Very insightful!
Go Ted .
Ted is campaigning for President. This is an impossible task.
@@fidelmercado2621 why?
@@margarethawaters5792 For Texas to file a SCOTUS claim against another state(s) the claim must fall within this Supreme Court’s constitutional and statutory subject-matter jurisdiction. “Controversies between two or more States.” U.S. CONST. art. III, § 2, “The Supreme Court shall have original and exclusive jurisdiction of all controversies between two or more States.” TEXAS ARGUES THAT THESE STATE ELECTIONS ADVERSELY EFFECTED THEIR ELECTION WITH NO EXPLANATION AS TO WHY. IT WAS ADDED JUST TO CHECK THE BOX.
TEXAS FAILS TO MEET THIS BAR. THIS IS NOT A CONTROVERSY BETWEEN STATES.
Patriots stand up and save America
What happened with the man arrested after having been caught with hard drives computer etc and was he tapped into the recorder's office in Maricopa county?
Who knows, maybe post an original source?
i hoping hes sitting somewhere with secret service as he should be
If there's any kind of justice & accountability hopefully he's wearing a pink jumpsuit eating moldy balogna sandwiches in Maricopa county jail at the very least.
Im going to research your question and update my findings here.
Hold the line Patriots
LOL, you believed that lie? Guess you're still waiting on the Obama Kenya birth certificate and Trump's tax returns. LOL.
@@pawel2003 doubt it
Thank you for doing these !
the constitutional violation on election procedures needs to be handled by the federal court when the local politicians do not come to an agreement. is it not?
So disappointed that Justice Alito put it on the docket and then dismissed it.
Actually, the SCOTUS wanted to use their time more wisely. The Texas case encompasses the issues the Kelly case did. Why hear both cases when the Texas case covers the Kelly case. They went for the bigger case that was more outcome determinative. Don't read anything into the rejection of the Kelly case. It will be addressed in the Texas case.
Kudos. I was thinking the same thing.
Thank you! You eased my mind!
@@michelleg7360 they didn’t even write a decision on the Kelly case because it was so bad
Defamation does not include mockery
Omg im so happy that ultimately justice will be done...great job patriots...we are the unsung heros
Y’all grandchildren are gonna be laughing at you in history class when they learn what you did
These cases should all be laughed out of court 1-49
Rule of Law!
1:04:00 I appreciated the scroll bar. It was interesting seeing others comments and information adding to the topic. Please put back on.
The other argument should have been; For every unconstitutional and illegal vote thats cast, it nullified one constitutional and legal vote and that on it's face disenfranchised legal voters 🗳
Of course!
All these lawsuits seem to be self defeating. You sent one inconsequential lawsuit to the supreme court that set you up for all the lawsuits to be dismissed.
Perhaps President Trump and Team Trump knew about this and that's why the President said more big news this week. We'll see what happens.
I like how you guys always over estimate his intelligence. That’s nice. 😊
Love this site. Very informative
"God Bless Texas" 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 Trump 2020 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
@Rowdy Gaines "Ah come on man" You can't honestly think this election was on the up and up and legit? Hahaha, Hahaha 🤣🤣😂🤣
@Rowdy Gaines Yeah, Yeah keep drinking the Koolaid for your Severe Case of "TDS" if SCOTUS lets that happen then we will no longer have a Country and that will end in a Civil War. But that's exactly what you Leftists want!! Hahaha Good Luck 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
P.S Put my name at the Top of yours and AOC's list Hahaha 🤣😂🤣😂
SCOTUS silence is deafening.
Amazing content keep it up
Can the Secretary of States and state Supreme Court justices who have acted un-constitutionally be impeached and removed from office quickly in GA, PA, WN, MI? I am Australian so don't understand how un constitutional acts can be tolerated.
Or somewhat bizarrely could the GA PA WI MI legislatures join Texas in the US supreme court
The US Constitution is not a Genie in the Bottle!
Lol, It sure is! You DO have to rub it maybe a lil hard for a bit AND the GENIE WILL pop out... Bigger than life!
We The People control the levers of the Great & Mighty OZ 👍❤️✌️
Texas case is HILARIOUS.
Louisiana joins in suit along side Texas thank you Jeff Landry A G
It’s difficult to understand what, and why, some of the courts are making their decisions. Thanks for talking us them. However, you don’t have to be a rocket scientist to see what caused all the chaos in the system; you just have to be a thinking human over the age of puberty. Thanks for keeping us informed regarding the courts.🙋🏼♀️
wouldn't the supreme court automatically reject the pa/kelly case for it's redundancy, since the tx/cruz case more comprehensively supersedes it?
"Unequal outcome?" You mean like voter suppression efforts by the counties that have occurred in Black/Brown communities for decades?
@@kevitawhite-leslie4388Why is having to show an ID suppression? Or having to show proof of residence? These are basic requirements that every developed country has.
@@VictorNewman201 1. Google it - literally 100s of videos explaining it. 2. America is not a developed country. Developed countries are paying their citizens to stay home during a pandemic.
@Hyrise Games really? Is that from Putin directly 😂
@@JL_Lux nancy pelosi is the reason many americans aren't getting covid compensation.......although her cronies are swimming in it, and she's refusing to help "the little people" unless she gets even more
I really enjoy this Channel. Please, keep up the good work.
The Kelly case for PA was not dismissed! The emergency injunction was denied.
Thank you 🙏 I am trying to help spread the word as well.
This sounds like semantics, but are you actually saying they could hear it sometime later?
People are not going to stand for this somebody better do something or they may have war. They cheated in Nevada here too. We have been praying for SCOTUS to save us
Pandora’s box was opened when they changed the voting rules
Probably should have started with the lawsuits then huh?
@@michaeldeichstetter3839 Probably indeed.
Fantastic capture, thank you for your hard work here
@Rowdy Gaines Nobody asked you
@Rowdy Gaines so happy for all your success, God bless
@Rowdy Gaines Dude just go away
The Texas suit isn't certioari, but complaint
Alright now that the decision is out and it’s a complete NO. When will you realize this guy has no idea what he is talking about!
Kelly's case wasn't denied, only the emergency injunction...
It passed the Safe Harbor deadline. That denial pretty much neutered the lawsuit.
@@fidelmercado2621 The only date that matters is January 20th, that's the only day in the Constitution. Everyother date is statute, and merely a guide to help the process run in a smooth and timely manner. Additionally, the so called "Safe Harbour" day explicitly states that "so long as there are no disputes." There are many, Texas dropped a BIG one on the 8th, and several other states have joined them.
IT. AIN'T. OVER.
@@JuenoMT you do realize that statutes are law and therefore EQUAL the constitution.
@@JL_Lux hahahahahaha, you're funny...
@@JL_Lux laws do not equal the constitution...laws have to answer to the constitution, therefore not equal...
The best reportage presentation on the Texas case, and I wonder if Ted Cruz couched the filing behind the scene.
How does the US protect Judges/Senators/Medical Professionals/Scientists/ MS Media Opinion and Producers from outside influence from other countries? What is the Law?
Influence? Are they getting phone calls? Threats? Do they agree freely? What does influence mean?
So because the issue should have been raised earlier, the Supreme Court will ignore the issue. That's pure lunacy.
Texas 😎
If the courts are shown that people are denied a vote they can go to the lower courts again, surely. How many votes can can be denied before it is counted?
Remember in South America there was a lot on news of JUDGES being murdered. Back then I thought it was terrible---NOW I KNOW WHY.
WTF?
My blood is boiling too, but no need to stoop to this. Delete it brother. Get a grip on yourself and think with your head not your heart.
It could be the reverse. What if they were good people and said no to bribery?
If you do some research, in one year back when the Clintons were in state politics (probably about 40/50 yrs ago) 3 people on their staff mysteriously “died” when they got too close to a fraudulent truth.
2:24:37 I have zero respect for FDR when I found out he made it “illegal” for citizens to own physical gold except for 4 or 5oz, 1933. Then he ordered for people to turn in their gold, several months after which he raised the nominal price from $20/oz to $35/oz, devaluing the US dollar (Fed Res debt note) by 75%.
Nail in the coffin when Nixon in 1971 took the rest of the world off the gold standard, especially when France’s Charles DeGaulle showed up on CA shores demanding their gold back, starting a run on physical gold in 1965.
Unfortunately, many many politicians have sold out the US sovereigns.
We’re in economic crisis because the entire financial system for which we work & save is based on Fed Res fiat garbage debt notes, currency.
It has NOTHING to do with the “covid” exploitation.
In person ga voters had to show id and have signature match verification befire being able to vote ,that illegal mail in didnt they didnt show id or signature verification.
Its treating demographic totally unfair vetting high standards to in person none for mail in.
Eqaul protection plus disenfranchisement and deluded votes
ALL mail-in votes had to be signature-checked and the only votes accepted were from registered voters.
@@rstevewarmorycom you have proof of that claim?
How can if the law is not followed then how can they not hear it
From what I understand , the Kelly case was not rejected, the emergency part of it was rejected. So I assume it is still active but could take a long time and still be rejected.
From what I heard and understand too is the Kelly case is on the docket.
Injunctive relief was denied the case is still pending I just looked it up.
I love transparency. Thank you. Just joined btw.
I’m starting to lose faith ..
Don't lose faith Trump planed all this he's not a stupid man he knew this would happen God has our backs
@@sarahrhodes7856 I hope it goes through, if Trump loses I will never vote again!
Me too
@@fluffycakes527 promise?
Who can you put up against Ted Cruz???? He is brilliant.
Some supreme court justices are compromised!
valid threats or payoffs ...
I think its just not wanting to be the ones to overturn what is perceived to be the election results.
You could call it cowardice (I do) but it's not necessarily due to blatant corruption.
Definitely interested in details
Uh this doesn’t “happen all the time”. This has almost if not ever happened in Supreme Court history. States just don’t sue each other at the Supreme Court all the time as you portray.
He makes many mistakes and is mostly biased towards trump.
I didn’t even know states could sue each other
TOTALLY agree. This is a landmark case!
Holly Allen this is new history. This has never happened. Now several states have joined Texas. Technically since this is original jurisdiction you could have live witnesses giving testimony before the Supreme Court. That never happens. Usually that happens in lower courts and the Supreme Court simply decides on the merits. I don’t think we’ll see witnesses here but it would be fascinating...
A few states sued Colorado over them legalizing weed, that’s the last I’ve heard of this happening. We all see how that turned out...
You had me 'til you said Mr. Green Eggs and Ham is talented. At anything.
SCOTUS only denied injunctive relief in the PA case. It did Not deny certiorari. Case is still pending.
Good content. This is why I joined your channel early on. Ty