Це відео не доступне.
Перепрошуємо.
Velshi: This single SCOTUS case could upend our entire regulatory system
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 сер 2024
- Under the Executive Branch, there are 15 departments, each of which is led by an appointed cabinet member. And within those departments, there are more than 400 distinct agencies and sub-agencies. This is the so-called “Administrative State” that the GOP has been pushing to reform for decades. These agencies, among other functions, are the regulatory bodies on which we rely in nearly every aspect of our daily lives. Last week, the Supreme Court accepted a case that has the potential to upend our governments entire regulatory system.
» Subscribe to MSNBC: on.msnbc.com/SubscribeTomsnbc
Follow MSNBC Show Blogs
MaddowBlog: www.msnbc.com/maddowblog
ReidOut Blog: www.msnbc.com/reidoutblog
MSNBC delivers breaking news, in-depth analysis of politics headlines, as well as commentary and informed perspectives. Find video clips and segments from The Rachel Maddow Show, Morning Joe, The Beat with Ari Melber, Deadline: White House, The ReidOut, All In, Last Word, 11th Hour, and Alex Wagner who brings her breadth of reporting experience to MSNBC primetime. Watch “Alex Wagner Tonight” Tuesday through Friday at 9pm Eastern.
Connect with MSNBC Online
Visit msnbc.com: on.msnbc.com/Readmsnbc
Subscribe to the MSNBC Daily Newsletter: MSNBC.com/NewslettersUA-cam
Find MSNBC on Facebook: on.msnbc.com/Likemsnbc
Follow MSNBC on Twitter: on.msnbc.com/Followmsnbc
Follow MSNBC on Instagram: on.msnbc.com/Instamsnbc
#SCOTUS #Velshi #GOP
To find out what is wrong with Americans look at our fatal attraction for fools.
🦆"Poor kids are just as smart as White kids," and ""I mean, you got the first mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and a nice-looking guy. I mean, that's a storybook, man." and “You cannot go to a 7-Eleven or a Dunkin' Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent.” and “I think the only reason Clarence Thomas is on the court is because he is black.” I can quote many racist things Biden has said.
Boy howdy! Joe Biden, Donald Trump, Adam Schiff, McConnell, Pelosi, all fools that have let our government get out of hand!
And we're foold because too many people confuse brash, bullying, asskicking and charisma for leadership.
@@filrabat1965 Perfectly said
And turning celebrities into politicians. Seems like a recipe for disaster...
Reagan was not quoting the Founders. He was quoting the ethos of the untaxed wealthy.
How does one mans wealth create the other man's poverty?
I bet you think Trump doesn't pay tax..
@@douglasreagan4979
Where do you think the money comes from?
@@jockyoung4491 Rich people spending, buying planes, building businesses, paying salaries. Where do you think money comes from? out of a Unicorn rump?
@@douglasreagan4979
I mean when someone makes money off of business, it comes from the consumers buying their product. If they had lowered their prices and increased salaries for workers, then they wouldn't have made so many billions.
I’m from an island in the Caribbean where we have a lot of written laws that only applies to the stupid people who wants to follow them, but doesn’t apply to people who has money to corrupt everyone. Imagine the caos and lack of rights. We, who suffer the deception of corruption in my sunny island, admire the USA for its regulatory system, efficiency and efficacy, where the rule of law applies…not anymore?
When USA goes to other countries to defend the democracy, is saying look at me. That’s what Americans need to keep in mind.
Thank you Ali Velshi and MSNBC for the compilation of records and data for this reporting.
Well said and thank you for the shout out and friendly reminder of how fragile democracy is and a lesson in humility.
Thank you for sharing your point of view😮
@@phillynurse9492 ❤
The Republicans are working really hard to destroy our regulatory agencies by de-funding them. They want to be free to abuse our environment to make the most possible money for themselves. They're sick, and so blind about their effect on the planet and our economy and people, that they MUST be stupid. If they're not stupid, then they are truly EVIL.
@@phillynurse9492 $248,041. That's the amt YOU TDS msLSD perverts OWE US Treasury for FAR LEFTIST DEMOCRATS INSANE SPENDING & BORROWING.
"only government is capable of tyranny." And I say the gop has the corner for tyranny.
Any large group of people can be capable of tyranny as well as the common bully.
"Government" is irrelevant, corporations are exactly the same thing. Only organization is capable of tyranny. Then again, only organization can stop it, as well. Rebellions, guerilla fighters, terrorist cells...all are organizations. And more often than not, they're as tyrannical, or worse, than whatever organization they're opposing (however justified such resistance might be).
VERO DISBAND THE REPUBLICAN PARTY
Was it Trump's DOJ & FBI appointed people who falsely accused him of Colluding with Russia & is a puppet of Putin? You never noticed that the Democrat majority in Congress actually carried out their partisan impeachment before their own investigation concluded.
What led to the faulty Crossfire Hurrican FBI investigation centered around the false accusations that Trump colluded with Russia to STEEL the 2016 Election?
This was tyranny committed by unethical dishonest democrats against the newly elected president.
The tyrannical democrats went so far as saying Trump committed a crime by asking the president of Ukraine a question.
Now it is your turn to give me some examples of GOP led tyranny if you can muster up some facts to support your claims as I have done for you in an attempt to educate you.
@@DoremiFasolatido1979 Indeed. That "only government is capable of tyranny" sound bite is so patently false that it doesn't even seem made with seriousness.
For exercising tyranny/being a tyrant what it's needed (the only necessary condition) is enough power. If someone/some group has enough power on a number high enough of human beings (to be a social/political matter), then ipso facto the possibility of tyranny arises (the concept became applicable). It doesn't matter how the power was obtained, what justification or legitimacy is attributed to it (if any), what it ultimately pretends, why, etc.,etc., etc.
Ray-gun was wrong of course, tyranny comes from multi-national corporations.
Tyranny comes from Citizens United.
Stop crashing the multinational corporations, that finance our Democrat party. The richest men in America are progressive Democrats. The vast majority of our large corporations are run by CEOs who are progressive Democrats. When we manage the government for 40 years, we gave these corporations, tax breaks, and in return they fund our Democrat party candidates you were running for state and federal office. Without the support of these wealthy, progressive Democrats and the CEOs behind these progressive corporations, we would be unable to compete with the Republicans. Leave these corporations alone.
@@cecilelaforce3686 - which is funded by multi-national corporations.
@@cecilelaforce3686 You don't know what tyranny means do you?
@@cecilelaforce3686 ~ Ah, yes. Thank the Koch Brothers although they’re not the government _per se_ but they have definitely influenced the rules.
The population has doubled since 1960 and per capita there are FAR fewer government employees in 2023.
If you ever try to build a commercial building you will know the red tape are much much much worse. My family have been doing this since the end of the 2nd world war, we all agree things are so much worse now than before. it is out of control
@@konigstiger3252I see no problem with regulations, of course there are more now than the 60's. Are you skirting regulations, you should not have any worries if not.
@@konigstiger3252 If you were the only person on the planet you could do what you want.
@@konigstiger3252 what kind of regulations? Build safer? Those kind?
If citizens were to wonder WHO was skirting safety regulations, WE would always wonder about COMMERCIAL BUILDERS FIRST. Donald J Trump is REKNOWNED FOR IT.
Reagan claimed to be against the big state, but he supported and expanded the Military-Industrial Complex, which was a state enterprise. Like a lot of right-wingers he was being disingenuous.
And even now, by McCarthy's own words the right want to literally cut EVERY aspect of gov't spending EXCEPT Defense, smh. But you gotta keep pumping several trillion dollars per decade into the hands of Boeing, Rytheon, Lockheed-Martin and all the others so they can return a miniscule portion of that money by way of bribes (oh, I mean "campaign donations").
Of course he did... you can't have a dictatorship unless you have a strong military willing to do your bidding.
Every last repuglikkkon President has been nothing but a disaster. But that still wouldn't be possible without control over Congress and the Senate.
he was also a bisexual....
@@letsRegulateSociopaths
I hadn't heard that about him... can you give me a link so I can read up on it...?
Can you please not quote Marjorie Traitor Greed?
But she's currently the most powerful person in Congress, with a firm grip on McCarthy's two leashes.
@@UnconventionalReasoning So should they give her more power??
@@wadap0 If they SCROTUS rules against the Dept of Commerce, *they* will give MTG more power. It is worth knowing that, as the consequence of a possible ruling. We can only get rid of her by acknowledging her power rather than ignoring it.
If the EPA is dismantled, the fishing industry won't have any edible fish left to regulate.
it is a case that was manufactured by Leonard Leo-- the Federalist Society
Once they became Morlocks. They can go back to eating each other. They got this.
They won't care if it edible as long as it sells to someone
@@davepc2u Yes, they can just change the food safety regs so toxic fish can enter the food chain.
@@AndyM_323YYY What FDA? It'll be gone too ...because China or something
Let's cut through the frosting. What is being decided is whether or not there is a thing called expertise. Whether it's possible for someone to know something, while at the same time another person does not.
This is being decided by six people who claim to have expertise on what a bunch of men were thinking 235 years ago.
@@UnconventionalReasoning the SC has stopped pretendin'
@@jorgegonzalez-larramendi5491 yes. Now they are prepared to assert their infinite knowledge on everything,
@@Patriot1789 _Everything!_
@@Patriot1789fr this comment section is full of a bunch of commies that want the president and his agencies to be a dictator lol. The supreme court is David and the executive branch is Goliath we are witnessing a biblical story my friends
There is a big difference between more regulation and better regulation.
Unless you believe that less regulation = better regulation :)
@@theodorepaul2610 I am all for smaller government and less regulation but I also acknowledge my fellow humans are all morons and there is a good reason many regulations exist.
As someone who lives in the Netherlands, I can agree on this statement. It's turning into a bureaucratic mess over here. That said, shutting down the department of education... doesn't sound like a good thing.
@@roadtrain_ Well they need to generate more voters who support far right extreme policies.
It is a pipe dream to think that government beurocrats can run industries better than the experts with careers in those industries. The government can never defend the regulatory nightmare it created on its actual merits, but as you show they can convince people that the fairy tale of good regulation is just a few elections away just like it has been for generations.
We need more regulation not less.
You need GOOD Regulation, not farcical claims by the rich and big business
We need for less regulation. We have seen the damage the regulation has done.
@@t.r.campbell6585 - yeah, who needs airbags on cars? Airlines should be able to fix their planes whenever they feel like it.
How stupid are you?
Yea exactly that’s why we should never vote for anyone in the GOP ever!🤷🏻♂️
@@t.r.campbell6585 troll
Regulatory systems are actually "Protect-People-From-Greedy-People-With-Power-Who-Don't-Care-What-They-Do-To-You-To-Get-More-Power" systems
Right?!? I love how our best and brightest want one worshipped for being job creators and geniuses, but when faced with the gentlest of regulation, suddenly they are crippled and can't possibly operate, let alone be competitive.
@@truthhurts9246 WELL, you do speak the truth when we elect people who take corporate cash and expect them to protect us from the effects of corporate greed. It is GOOD that you still acknowledge that the greedy rich are the problem, bolstering my point. Thanks
Depends upon who is in control of the agency what their objective actually is.
"Democracy doesn't work without civic engagement." --Justice Stephen Bryer. If voters aren't writing their representatives and contributing to public comments on legislative proposals then special interests fill the void regardless of who is in office.
@tuberific No amount of writing your reps and contributing are going to overcome the power of the lobbyist money.
Great reporting Alli!!!! Regulatory agencies are under attack. Keep the EPA
The rule of law -- the gov't itself -- is under attack.
What about the car you drive, the medicine you take, the food you eat.. etc.. They want to eliminate regulations to put more 🤑 money in their pockets. YOUR safety is not their first priority.
@@coragoodwin344 They private profit and socialize their wastes. So the taxpayer ends up cleaning up their messes.
The first obligation of gov't is protection of public health and safety.
What we have here is a peaceful protest by LEFTIST DEM RADICALS BLM & ANTIFA (while the city is n huge flames behind him).
If SCotUS dares take that step, they will soon find that they have adjudicated themselves out of a job. No regulation, no laws.
Big guy?
No, regulations will just have to be written narrowly in keeping with the intent of laws passed by Congress instead of being bastardized to suit the preexisting agendas of the bureaucracy.
Something has to be done, quickly about the court.
They'll play with fire until the house burns down.
@@simonelliot3712ah, the house gops are going to launch a big nuclear bomb over the us at the moment. There will be no house anymore to burn down and nothing to deregulate as well.
Thank you for explaining this to trump, Velshi. While trump tried to tear down these institutions. This is why scotus need term limits and court packing.
You are right on! The term limits on the Presidency was cut back from unlimited to 2 terms by R. Reagan. I believe that term limits on the Presidency should not exist, only one Presidency was beyond 1 term that was Franklin Roosevelt, however the American people should be able to keep a successful Presidency beyond 2 terms, if that President is predisposed to do so.
Look how business and corporate powers have increased with their wealth. Look how corporations influence government through lobbying and favors.
And foreign countries like China and their partners the Biden family.
We just gave them a $2trillion gift that puts us $2trillion more in debt.
I wish you, Mr. Velshi, were the 'decider.'
Scary.
13 scotus judges now, Senate!
No as you would have the country spilt apart. My state would leave the Union and the US army couldn't stop us.
democrats want to change the rules because they're losing.💙
@Varuda Zahira Like the Repug's have been doing ?
That kind of stacking ?
Heck yeah. Then when the Republicans get in. They can add 4 more. Eventually they can rebuild another 535 member congress out of the judicial branch.
The GOP house majority says f 0ff
Reagan impaired my adult life. I didn't vote for him, I was 18.
Reagan saved the World.
I voted for Anderson.
@@douglasreagan4979
🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
@@douglasreagan4979 from what? Equal prosperity?
@@douglasreagan4979 ...for the greedy.
Expand the SCOTUS! Otherwise this country will be destroyed from within.
Why didn't Democrats do it when they had both House and Senate.
@@JohnDoe-vy5hh Joe Manchin, Sinema
Just replace the ones that lied under oath to get there. Problem solved.
The duties of the Supreme Court are outlined in the United States Constitution, with the exception of these justices, deciding cases that might be unconstitutional.
@@RichardQuaid Not without a 67 senate majority. Otherwise they are untouchable.
Given the historical background, it’s hard to believe the Founders could have looked forward to the full flowering of unfettered capitalism. The Industrial Revolution was just starting with wholesale destruction of the environment still 100 years away. Slavery was a normal mercantile transaction. Feudal systems were still in place around the world. Anyone trying to justify today’s opinions and actions based on the Founders’ intent ignores completely our responsibility to apply the knowledge and sensibilities we possess now.
Which is the basis for the right wing. They hearken to a nebulous past time where things were "good." They refuse to grow, they refuse to change...two traits essential for life. They are the party of stagnation and ultimately death.
Yes, thank you for stating the facts clearly.
You make a very important point!!!
Well said!
Man, its not like a lot of the staggering environmental destruction and horrible working conditions were improving at the exact same rate as they continued to after all these agencies were made, it also just cant be that a lot of the stuff that wasnt being improved upon could be taken care of with targeted laws and without giving government agencies the extreme amount of power they have today to basically make their own laws and perform the job of the judicial branch largely for them, but no the founders were wrong, lets ignore our founding documents and the intentions of those who made them and make a super regulated socialist paradise just like all the other socialist countries, or maybe we can go for communism, dont want that but still want an overbearing out of control monster of a government we can always try fascism, i hear its fun, capitalism and a free society has created the best standard of living in history
Educating the people by telling them the truth... the ultimate requirement of the fourth estate.... keep telling the truth. Well done and thank you
Well said!
How's that work when only 50% of the population acknowledge the truth and the other 50% will never even hear it?
No, the sad thing is that people _DON'T_ want to be educated because it undermines what they _think_ is true... so you'll have to drag them kicking and screaming.
Absolutely frightening. Corporations care more about money than people. For Pete's sake, a drug cartel offered a better apology than the corporate bigwig that got caught for something at about the same time. 😮
Yes, and who does the gov hire to run those agencies?
Former Executives of those corporations... all in bed together... you've been played.
"Wasn't this the admonition of the Founding Fathers, that government tends to grow and take on power until freedom is lost." - Reagan
What "freedoms" was Reagan worried about? Freedom of corporations to pollute without government interference. Freedom of food manufacturers to disregard the amount of arsenic and rat feces in food sold to consumers. Freedom of banks and other financial institutions to rip off consumers. Freedom of employers to treat workers like garbage. And on, and on, and on.
Ikr?
I'm happy he's gone. He would be all over Fake news. Sitting right next to that other bad actor. What's his name. O they fired him.
Republicans are not only unpatriotic, happy to promote unfettered freedom for gun owners and corporations, but actually only care about individual freedom if it is male and white. And why not? They want to think like the men of the Revolution in 1776.
Freedom to steal money $$$ from our weapons defense budget.
How many trillion is it worth this week?
Then...after many senseless deaths (like what air pollution/ smog did)...the regulations will be re-instated.
People will have to die first.
And with this SCOTUS, they've probably already made their decision before even hearing the case.
The judges on the GOP nominee list are vetted by corporate fund raisers who raise hundreds of millions from corporate lobby groups via the federalist society
Well, yeah. That's why they took up the case
@@youareobscure Also, Alito will leak this one as well so that he can blame a leaker and giggle as he watches the population squirm as with the Roe decision. It gives him endless delight.
This is all about increasing corporate power and profit. Nothing to do with preventing “tyranny” which many corporations end up actually supporting.
Whinge more.
I had quite a few bosses that were tyrants.
and even more employees that were drama queens 24/7.
@@malachi- I had a few who treated me good while still maintaining a boss employee relationship. Guess which one I worked the hardest for.
@@mgreg8134 Haha... you're admitting they played you.
I know... I know...
@@malachi- The ones that were tyrants were sorry to lose me. The worst one when I left most of his other employees left also. They decided like I did that they didn't need his crap, a year later he was filing for bankruptcy. So tell me who got played.
Reagan also removed the 'Fairness Doctrine' and brought Murdoch into his fold. How has that worked out?
Can you play this information over and over to make sure people hear it!
Velshi is a treasure of MSNBC
😂😂😂😂😂
I agree. I am looking forward to MSNBC taking over the #2 spot from CNN in news media and eventually the #1 spot from Fox.
@@ryblack5032 troll
Most of these departments and agencies are only needed because corporations can't seem to regulate themselves. Health and safety have always taken a backseat to profits.
Over the course of Reagan's term the debt ceiling was raised 18 times, from $935 billion to $2.8 trillion.
These are people wanting anarchism/chaos.
No regulations would be the greatest thing that ever happened for US business. Without regulations, I could just dump the "unwanted accumulation of waste" from my septic tank company in the empty lot next to you house, or in the stream that drains into the local reservoir. That would be good, right?
Republican Party wants a reverse Chevron deference. Judges should defer to Big Money & Against ordinary Anericans
@I Themis And the EPA was even worse under dictator Trump than during the Reagan regime. We might as well have renamed it the Environmental Destruction Agency, based on who was running it, and how, and the laws and rules they were dismantling for their regulation hating wealthy GQP benefactors. Trump's EPA was worse than useless, it was actually a destructive force.
Judges should destroy Chevron and force Congress to pass laws instead of allowing agencies to do so.
The Republican party wants to put lawmaking back in the hands of lawmakers. The Democrats are the ones that want unelected bureaucrats to have unchecked power.
That's what we need destroy the department of education. Great way to move this country forward. Not to mention it wreaks of racism and classism.
The people who thought it was funny to intimidate justices at home are going to really regret it. This is way bigger than affirmative action. DOJ will be overwhelmed by appeals from administrative decisions. This is why they're desperate to remove Thomas.
Regulatory bodies are necessary to ensure the health, safety and well being of everyone. When companies fight or lobby to get rid of these agencies, it’s a sure bet it’s only to increase their own profits, usually at the expense of the everyday consumer.
Then again, who needs clean air or drinking water? Who needs cheaper insulin and drug prices? Who needs better and safer working conditions?Certainly not the American people it seems.
🤔 good questions, and we know the answers!
Thanks for your comment.
Who watches the watchers? Government agencies should not be able to run wild and essentially make law any more than corporations should.
Some citizens are so overwhelmingly stupid that they would vote against this. They would vote that corporations can pollute as much as they want while not owning a single share in said company. Because Republicans hate who they hate.
The Right is doing everything they possibly can to protect corporate polluters. The worst thing they've done is gutted monitoring programs for pollution so people won't know what's happening when cancers, neurodegenerative disorders, and deaths are concentrated in an area, and will have NO EVIDENCE from which to prosecute the polluter. Gutting WOTUS just opened up swamps and wetlands to become toxic chemical dumping grounds. Large polluters will make sure to locate near a wetland so they can dump their waste without penalty. Heck, we've even stopped penalties for massive oil spills under Trump.
At least it was nice to see Kavanaugh step up, accurately predict the outcome, and vote against weakening WOTUS.
@@wildmouse5888 government is elected, corporations are not. Like it or not, agencies still aline with the democratic process.
The value of regulatory agencies is simple...They represent all of us, not just one single entities values. We have seen that as a Nation there is no more important thing in domestic Ethics then to have regulation over business and our actions. Each of us is free and have rights, this is a given. Our rights stop when those freedoms and rights affect others. For Instance....Love canal affected all the people around it, and their lives directly...before it was addressed the businesses were free to dump toxic and poisonous waste straight into public waterways.
Businesses NEED ethical laws rules and a watchdog because Capitalism ends with Monopolies, Ultra-wealthy, ultra-poor, and Oligarchies if not monitored and kept in check. We saw this with the robber barons a bit over 100 years ago. Unions, trust-breaking, and other things to stop them owning everything was a priority for republican Teddy Roosevelt.
We Need Regulatory agencies, they are our eyes and ears...and fists for dealing with large powerful entities like the mega-corp that are popping up now again. They protect US, not the corps... it is too bad that people think in some cases that they are bad things. They CAN get to powerful and corrupt...but they work for us and they CAN be cut back IF this is found. They Work for US...corps work for their shareholders/owners.
With that being said, I am pretty sure the SCOTUS will back their corp overlords and take as much power away from them ( meaning US really) as they can.
🦆What kind of Business do you own ? I owned My own Business for 35 years here in California. The Government was always my enemy. Democrats act like they hate people who own their business. Democrats like working in Government.
Yep, in unbound grief, I concur with your outlook. We are doomed, by the results of 40 years of republican corruption and lies.
Regulators, don’t represent us, they represent industries in most cases. The FDA represents the drug industry, etc.
American Legislative Exchange Council. The regulatory agencies are supposedly meant to protect the common good. However, remember that many if not the majority of politicians are bought and even those that are not can be tricked, silenced, or left as a powerless minority. The agencies that are meant to protect us are often used as a tool of those that grease the right palms to either stifle the competition directly through carefully structured regulations written by corporate lawyers or by selective application/inspection. Remember the largest workplace raid in ICE history was retaliation for a large workers' rights lawsuit, and I remember a news story about a welding company that had safe conditions and paid market wages getting regularly raided while his competition which paid much less and had dangerous conditions was never inspected (likely because they greased the right palms).
That being said we at least have a measure of influence in government through our votes and the absence of government regulation does not mean an absence of 'other' regulation made by the most powerful entities in the resulting power vacuum. Prior to the labor movement plantation workers reasoned that there was often little difference between the conditions of their slaves and of northern factory workers. Heck, there was no limit on immigration in large part due to the need to constantly replace the workforce with whole and healthy workers and the cost for much work was in bodies as much as it was materials.
They do not represent all of us at all. Which regulatory agencies have any elected officials? This is remarkably delusional thinking. The administrative state is an abomination that dies with the fed reserve.
Watching from outside the US, I can't help but think I'm watching the rapid unravelling of another empire.
Because we are. We are also experiencing the turbo-charged expansion and increase of other empires into our personal lives, founded by multinational corporations.
From the inside, lol. They only make it seem like it. Everything’s fine, they really control nothing. I can list 1000 things that effect my life more than a politicians ruling. We still have people that build things. People that fix things. People that know things. No matter what happens, that can’t be taken away. The Americans that are strong and know how to build a prosperous life have nothing to worry about. Now or ever. Times may get tough but only in our sense of what regular should be.
Something you should know as a non-American. Our media gets paid more if they get more impressions. The best way to do that is to strike an emotion with a negative sediment. Its capitalism at its finest. Can’t really argue it but it makes everything seem bad when it’s not.
The US has up's a downs like everyone else, and the US doesn't have an Empire.
If only it were so easy to undo the deeply ingrained delusion of American Exceptionalism that keeps us from looking at our problems with any sensibility. Being rational, critical thinkers capable of discerning the truth from propaganda is difficult and boring. Listening to a demagogue tell us what or who to be angry at, well that's just good television.
That's because it use to be a people that worked together, but then the Left came along and did nothing but push, divide and conquer, go against everything the country was built on, constantly.
Wow! This is a super presentation and Mr. Velshi does a great job of making a complex subject understandable! Bravo!
That is plainly wrong. Without adequate regulation wealthy individuals, groups and corporations are perfectly capable of tyranny
Horrifying
1:40 Chevron only applies in civil cases. I'm a little disappointed you didn't mention the Rule of Lenity in regards to Criminal cases as context for your audience.
That would have been VERY helpful and the fact that it wasn't included is typical of the negligence of the mainstream media corporations and social media platforms in providing the full and accurate details of just about every news story that is reported these days.
Why is a criminal case idea relevant to the agencies making rules which rarely have criminal penalties?
This is less an issue of ambiguous law and more about delegated power.
@@UnconventionalReasoning It really isn't. I think the reason Luke brought the issue up was so that folks weren't making that mistake -- thinking that regulatory agencies were manipulating the law and doing an end run around criminal sanctions. People hear of things happening in the legal arena and they don't initially think about civil law. Instead they think it's about who and whether someone goes to jail.
@@larryk1865 Thank you for explaining that.
If the Court followed the same lax standard of allowing regulatory agencies to criminalize whatever they wished, I'm sure they would be glad to use it very often.
But what is being proposed is that the same rule apply to civil action and regulations. and why NOT? After all, it is the Congress that is responsible for passing laws, not regulatory agencies. I don't see any distinction between civil and criminal law in Article I of the constitution:
U.S. Constitution - Article I
All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.
Good piece. Thank you.
Thank you for bringing this to our attention.
Follow the money.
We will wait with baited breath until Harlan Crow gives us his judgement.
If you look into it, this case was not started with fish. It was started by Leonard Leo--- the Federalist Society.
So interesting and informative! Well explained. We need more reports like this. Thank you.
Reagan ruined us.
He sure got the ball rolling...faster...
First, he ruined California. Then he ran for president
And Newt Gingrich
Joseph McCarthy started it all with the Red Scare, and Reagan made it indellible. It was all in place, and then reinforced by the Bushes, and they all gave Trump an unwritten handbook. We HAVE so much to reverse.
Good. It needed to be upended because it was out of control.
YES!!! Enjoy the leftist tears. 😎👍
Excellent piece, "Mr. Business", Ali Velshi
Keep on keepin' on!
The most corrupt court in the land should be IGNORED until the corruption is rooted out. 😡
Absolutely
The "court" is illegitimate.
Needs to be expanded now.
Its all fun and games until that stacked court says its ok to line you up against a wall.
I'm a teacher, is this just the end for me?
Odds are good it will be at muzzle velocity.
Yes, sadly. Authoritarians need a poorly educated populace. But they're so dumb that they think that killing education today will affect the populace immediately.
let's hope
We had teachers before the Dept of Ed was a thing, we'll still need them after, if there is an after.
@@student1979oct Yes, and you can be one of the incompetent teachers. Good luck with 150 students a day.
So the American public should do without regulatory agencies and hope that corporations will do the right thing and engage in adequate testing? Yeah, right!! Regulations push innovation towards safer technology. It would be a big mistake to abolish the role of experts who are public servants.
And unregulated AI development and use thereof? Sounds like the start of the Terminator franchise. Or the 2002 movie Minority Report.
Most safety regulations are written in blood
@@Dragonx0562 It's best to close the barn door before the horses escape.
@@Dragonx0562 Which is why they're necessary.
Some states like Oklahoma have done away with testing and monitoring. The oil drillers want your tumors to be an unexplained surprise, and you'll have no data from which to launch a lawsuit against them. No monitoring, fewer lawsuits, no concern for the people's health and welfare. This country is being ruined!
Go Velshi! Love your program’s! Love MSNBC!
Excellent reporting, as usual. Thanks Mr Velshi.
We just sat there and let this corruption go
Reason was a creep
You are a creep Sharon. You don’t understand what you are talking about.
15 Departments and over 400 distinct agencies and sub-agencies ??? Sounds like a good reason to limit Government expansion !!!
Regan deregulated pharma, that was the beginning of the end of my life! I was a student at university my wife had beautiful baby boy Afgar 9 and 10 very active and alert . Four months later because of the pharmaceutical companies were no longer required to break the germ for a vaccine my son along wiyh a couple of million others had an adverse reaction, the lucky parents had their babies die, the rest of us have spent the last 40 years plus careing for the unfortunate children knee deep in diapers, physical abuse, siezures,and depression. Regan si gle handedly killed an entire generation of children just so more money could be made by Republicans and their doners.
so very informative. like the video
Anarchy international.
Stop bullying SCOTUS!
The Executive branch is supposed to enforce laws, not create them. Overturning Chevron will force Congress to actually do their job and pass the regulatory rules that the Executive agencies have been creating all these years.
If people could be trusted we would have less regulations.
IF people could be trusted. But they can't. They will act in their own best interest regardless of who it hurts (especially a distant person or an out-group member).
Funny, because govt cant be trusted
Our government is not too big. The problem is those in key positions are owned by the top rich in the United States.
Oh no! People accountable to the voter may actually have to make decisions as opposed to faceless bureaucrats!
That was fantastic. Thank you
The people who complain about regulations are usually the people who want to break those regulations. The Administrative State exists for a reason. Because over and over again we have proved incapable of regulating ourselves. When shortcuts and saving money become the number one goals, there goes safety and health. Businesses of all sorts PROVED that they were incapable of creating safe working environments and did nothing but exploit workers for profit. They still do every chance they get. Airlines couldn't regulate themselves or the skies. Automobile makers couldn't build safe cars. I mean, what kind of future do conservatives want for us? Look at the few institutions that regulate themselves . . . like the Supreme Court or local police departments. There is where you see chronic abuses! Those who complain about oversight are the ones who need it the most.
Yes, I agree. Thanks for your honest comment.
Delusional whining. You point to nothing and assume everything. Name the chain of events that supports your argument or cry at having no argument whatsoever. Do you even understand what regulation is? How does the supreme court regulate itself? Name the regulatory bodies of the US.
Oh, and you forgot the federal reserve in terms of unchecked regulatory control. Shill.
The SOLE Reason for the Administrative State exists is to control the lives and freedoms of US Citizens. NO ONE elected the bureaucrats who think THEY RUN THIS COUNTRY. If you really believe the Administrative State supports the freedoms guaranteed by our constitution you are simply ignorant. But the good news is ignorance can be cured. Stupidity cannot.
With the inferior court we have right now, democracy doesn't have a chance of surviving.
Good thing since we aren’t a democracy!
Democracy doesn't have a chance with a bunch of liberals who want to ignore the rules of democracy when it doesn't serve their interests.
He cut out tons of Parks and Recreation areas and jobs!!! Closed National Parks!!!
FDA it’s also the only agency in the country that manages medical drug products and certifies them. So reducing its regulatory power is like asking for trouble.
Keep in mind that states don’t manage drug approval processes.
I kind of like the answer of the experts so long as it doesn't break the Supreme law of the land. But we actually need real experts and leaders that won't be bought out by the corporations that are being served. Like for once, really tell the people the truth if they need to evacuate due to, I don't know. A train derailement that carried dangerous chemicals and burnt for days into the atmosphere of a small rural community.
What we can’t escape is the correlation between a smaller government with less regulations and banking failures, environmental disasters, mass murders, etc.
Justin Jones' latest video is, as always, brilliant! 👈😍👍
Lol while having the biggest spending on military I’m the world….
I don't know how you can stop this, I think it may be too late. The supreme Court has already been bought and paid for years ago. Go back to the date Clarence started accepting these gifts and that's the date they started plotting 😟
If i could only choose between an administrative state and a corporate state, I'd choose administrative every day of the week.
The only problem with Chevron is that it limits the ability of the courts to decide on cases because it says that the courts must defer to the agencies in cases of ambiguity. This makes the courts not have to do their job of judging difficult cases and just side with the agencies because they are supposed to according to chevron.
No, this is very a hyperbolic argument of what ending Chevron deference would do. It would NOT end regulation of industry or enforcement of laws. It would end the arbitrary creation by the administrative state of new regulations that are not given to them. Congress makes the laws and regulations and the executive branch enforces them. Go ahead shoot at me with “Oh! but they’re the experts not congress!!”
Then have your experts write a report with a list of recommended regulations to congress and have them pass into laws. That’s already how it works, but Chevron deference allows them to use ambiguous parts of laws that aren’t clarified and effectively interpret (create) new laws.
Looks like they’re still holding onto their delusion. 🤷♂️
It's exceedingly easy to be afraid of things you don't understand.
The absence of term limits for SCOTUS and no way to vote judges out is horrifying.
Imagine if all the regulatory agencies were gone....and Congress actually had to do something useful instead of pass pork laden bills and other crap. Imagine if Congress had to actually vote to expand regulations instead of some unelected bureaucrat simply deciding that something is now illegal just because they SAY it is.
Theyre pros at overgrthrowing but when the dust settles the same ones wil be standing there saying " i didnt thinkbit woukd be like this .
We need to vote against the administrative power of the Supreme Court, they certainly are not listening to We The People! 🤬🤬🤬
They listen only to their special interests and their personal whims.
Very informative!! Thanks
I have a question:
How can the government Stop our social security checks, that's not their money, that's the peoples money they and their employers paid in over many years!
It's not their money to deny us our payments of the money we've earned!
Can anybody explain that to me!😮
Because the market requires workers and social security allows workers to leave the market. And since the younger populations aren't having as many children as the prior, the number of workers is decreasing. So, rather than finding ways to reduce workers, they are pushing measures to force people to work longer.
Most regulations, not unlike unions, are intended to protect those of us that live and work with honesty and integrity as part of the 99% socioeconomic class. Weakening these protections will accelerate the country's descent into full-blown oligarchy.
Unions are some of the most corrupt entities in the country; especially public-employee unions.
Chevron deference is indeed a huge problem. The Administrative state is indeed too large and powerful. They regularly exceed their legal authority. On the other hand, the notion of automatic harmony is equally fraught.
It is the Congress that is responsible for passing regulations into law:
U.S. Constitution - Article I |
All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.
@@SeattlePioneer Yes, and in a pretend world, the city of Seattle is well-governed.
@@BobSmith-lb9nc Actually, the City of Seattle is doing pretty well, solving a number of the problems overwhelming Portland and San Francisco.
Just recently, the city has vacuumed up the vagrants living on the streets and RVs in my neighborhood. That gets ride of some rather significant nuisances.
It’s about time they dump that law
You are one of the best man!
I never thought I would think of the phrase "clear and present danger" in reference to The Supreme Court of the United States and its conservative strangle-hold on us.
VOTE BLUE! VOTE BLUE!
Speaking to Detroit autoworkers in October 1980, Republican presidential candidate Ronald Reagan described what he saw as the American Dream under Democratic president Jimmy Carter. The family garage may have still held two cars, cracked Reagan, but they were “both Japanese and they’re out of gas.”1 The charismatic former governor of California suggested that a once-proud nation was running on empty. But Reagan held out hope for redemption. Stressing the theme of “national decline,” he nevertheless promised to make the United States once again a glorious “city upon a hill.”2 In November, Reagan’s vision triumphed.
Love that there was no personal bias. Didn't use scare tactics or ask sensationalist questions. Just told us what was going on. We need a lot more of that.
That they're trying to dismantle the agencies that try to ensure we're doing the right things for the right reasons is not surprising. We prove, more often than not, that our own worse tendencies need to be monitored and managed. Because we _don't_ do the right things for the right reasons, unless we're told to.