I'd like to hear what Guelzo says today (in 2024) about how bad the division is. This video was made before we had our first non-peaceful transition of power.
I love Allen Guelzo, not only for being the superb historian and writer that he is, but even more so for being the Calvinist that he is. I devour every book and article that he writes, including for Banner of Truth and the Scottish Reformation Society Bulwark.
Dr Guelzo's judgment that a lack of interest in history betrays an incuriosity about God in the person who has no such interest is fascinating, something I'd never considered. Remarkable.
Why does Cairn University not have Presidential Historians like this alumnus and like: Walt Kaiser, Mark Noll, or David F.Wells and Gordon Hugenberger Ph.D.. Instead they have women and Men who have not published books or journal articles in reputable scholarly journala.
We don’t make a particular personality the target of our mud slinging. I like that. Would God that it were true now on August 2020. We now hope for an honest election year!Lincoln was a real leader in those turbulent times. Seward was a huge help. He had to use all sorts of emergency measures, because of the war. He accomplished very much with all of the challenges.
Well…. Is the question of whether elections can be trusted or not, such a dividing question that does create sufficient division to trigger violence? Has it not shown itself to be such an issue?
Current events say that the war Guelzo describes so eloquently is not over: Appomattox in the same vein as Versailles but in an entirely American sense with the past as prologue; last American Civil War shooting in anger battle (in Philip Sheridan's 5th military district) on 11/22/1963 taking the presidency in coup d'etat from Yankee Boston to Confederate Texas.
Sam McDonald or Sam Donaldson? And it wasn't so much the questions SD asked, it was his aggressive and disrespectful tone. He loved the limelight more than journalism.
This guy sounds like courtier. A Lincoln hagiographer. The southern states has every right to secede from the union when they believed that their vital interests were threatened by a tyrannical federal government.
I'd like to hear what Guelzo says today (in 2024) about how bad the division is.
This video was made before we had our first non-peaceful transition of power.
I love Allen Guelzo, not only for being the superb historian and writer that he is, but even more so for being the Calvinist that he is. I devour every book and article that he writes, including for Banner of Truth and the Scottish Reformation Society Bulwark.
Great video. Very smart man.
Dr Guelzo's judgment that a lack of interest in history betrays an incuriosity about God in the person who has no such interest is fascinating, something I'd never considered. Remarkable.
Dr. Guelzo explains the crux of the matter clearly and succinctly in the first few minutes.
Why does Cairn University not have Presidential Historians like this alumnus and like: Walt Kaiser, Mark Noll, or David F.Wells and Gordon Hugenberger Ph.D.. Instead they have women and Men who have not published books or journal articles in reputable scholarly journala.
At 18:45 I would add WWII as a time of giants; FDR, Marshall, King, Ike, Patton, MacArthur...
Did President Lincoln speech at Gettysburg & President Franklin Roosevelts to enter us in World War 2 speech had both equal are not?
We don’t make a particular personality the target of our mud slinging. I like that. Would God that it were true now on August 2020. We now hope for an honest election year!Lincoln was a real leader in those turbulent times. Seward was a huge help. He had to use all sorts of emergency measures, because of the war. He accomplished very much with all of the challenges.
Is that a 2nd Corps, Army of Potomac lapel pin on his jacket?
Well…. Is the question of whether elections can be trusted or not, such a dividing question that does create sufficient division to trigger violence? Has it not shown itself to be such an issue?
Current events say that the war Guelzo describes so eloquently is not over: Appomattox in the same vein as Versailles but in an entirely American sense with the past as prologue; last American Civil War shooting in anger battle (in Philip Sheridan's 5th military district) on 11/22/1963 taking the presidency in coup d'etat from Yankee Boston to Confederate Texas.
You're silly. Read Vincent Bugliosi's "Reclaiming History." You might be threatening yourself with learning something.
@@bobtaylor170 I've read everything/all Bugliosi relative to JFK.
Sam McDonald or Sam Donaldson? And it wasn't so much the questions SD asked, it was his aggressive and disrespectful tone. He loved the limelight more than journalism.
John Quincy Adams was roght about Jackson.
This guy sounds like courtier. A Lincoln hagiographer. The southern states has every right to secede from the union when they believed that their vital interests were threatened by a tyrannical federal government.
Put on your best civil war confederate reenactment uniform the go look in the mirror and tell yourself this; I lost
The swift possibility literally form because helium regionally pretend apropos a distinct spike. expensive, certain wall
Hell, everybody knows that!
Obviously
Best not to smoke meth before weighing in on such a discussion, Beulah…😱🙈🤣
Dude take your meds 😂😂😂