Ooh... I love them with my architectural heart! So much Openness, Interactive and mind/spiritual Awareness can be experienced through these spaces. You really can see and feel their main aim for their architecture while visiting their projects. And no fancy talks... just straight to the point!!!
The introduction was horribly long and pretentious. And the questions at the end were horribly formed and incoherent for a native English speaker let alone a Japanese speaker. I expected a lot more from Harvard. However I enjoyed the architecture and the unique and interesting approach Kazoo and Rye take.
Stephen Johnston Verbiage is the price of admission into much architectural discourse these days. It puts an end to wider public debate but makes architects seem clever and helps isolate their often flawed thinking from any sort of criticism.
Regarding their design for the Sydney New South Wales museum: They say the land of Australia has an "important history." (Art Newspaper). But the photograph that runs with the article shows just the ultra high tech ugly modern city skyline -- an architectural reality that has nothing to with the "land." It is not possible for them to undo that atrocity with one building. And if it's anything like some of the other buildings this partnership has done, it will be hideous. Look at The New Museum in NYC--awful. Looming and dominating like a monster over the old human scale buildings that DEFINE New York. Completely out of scale and proportion, with a tacky rainbow sign Horrible. Ridiculous. Godzilla, admit it.
The introduction was horribly long and pretentious. And the questions at the end were horribly formed and incoherent for a native English speaker let alone a Japanese speaker. I expected a lot more from Harvard. However I enjoyed the architecture and the unique and interesting approach Kazoo and Rye take.
6:25 to skip intro
0:00 SANAAの紹介 (Introduction about SANAA)
6:39 開会の辞 (Opening remarks)
8:06 金沢21世紀美術館 (21st Century Museum of Contemporary Art, Kanazawa)
19:27 ROLEXラーニングセンター (Rolex Learning Center Lausanne)
33:52 サーペンタイン・ギャラリー・パビリオン (Serpentine Gallery Pavilion)
39:06 豊島美術館 (Teshima Art Museum)
45:25 犬島「家プロジェクト」概要 (Inujima Art House Project)
47:53 犬島「家プロジェクト」F邸
50:44 犬島「家プロジェクト」石職人の家跡
51:44 犬島「家プロジェクト」A邸・S邸
52:42 犬島「家プロジェクト」中の谷東屋
52:49 犬島「家プロジェクト」C邸
53:12 犬島「家プロジェクト」I邸
53:58 House A (House A)
57:17 北鎌倉の住宅 (House in Kita-Kamakura)
1:01:08 すみだ北斎美術館 (The Sumida Hokusai Museum)
1:03:14 なかまちテラス(Nakamachi terrace)
1:04:07 ルーヴル＝ランス (Louvre-Lens)
Ooh... I love them with my architectural heart!
So much Openness, Interactive and mind/spiritual Awareness can be experienced through these spaces.
You really can see and feel their main aim for their architecture while visiting their projects.
And no fancy talks... just straight to the point!!!
Seen through it!
Geniuses! :) They can do what others have not even thought about. The introduction was eloquent and poetic.
students that ask questions to look smart and not to get smarter by hearing the answeres.
Not only student but the so called "academics" as well.
"Lightness and heaviness is almost the same" .... wow
Minute, please?
reading an introduction is a slap in the face
he's embarrassing
The introduction was horribly long and pretentious. And the questions at the end were horribly formed and incoherent for a native English speaker let alone a Japanese speaker. I expected a lot more from Harvard. However I enjoyed the architecture and the unique and interesting approach Kazoo and Rye take.
Stephen Johnston Verbiage is the price of admission into much architectural discourse these days. It puts an end to wider public debate but makes architects seem clever and helps isolate their often flawed thinking from any sort of criticism.
@@mrkeogh Well said!
Beautiful
What is Kazuyo's backround/childhood?
what do you think about corners?
Foot fetish Tarantino style
thanks
19:30 learning center, lausanne
Holy smokes... That introduction was cringe-worthy.
kaziiiiiiuyoooooi Sejayma.
Is there a written form of this lecture?
The video quality is very poor, why?
Dark during presentation in a movie hall
Harvard Graduate School Of Design Faculty Of Architecture Of Class 2023
that scott cohen chap talks a lot o' fluff.
What an absolutely horribly pretenttious introduction, so sad.
Regarding their design for the Sydney New South Wales museum: They say the land of Australia has an "important history." (Art Newspaper). But the photograph that runs with the article shows just the ultra high tech ugly modern city skyline -- an architectural reality that has nothing to with the "land." It is not possible for them to undo that atrocity with one building. And if it's anything like some of the other buildings this partnership has done, it will be hideous. Look at The New Museum in NYC--awful. Looming and dominating like a monster over the old human scale buildings that DEFINE New York. Completely out of scale and proportion, with a tacky rainbow sign Horrible. Ridiculous. Godzilla, admit it.
horrible questions!
The introduction was horribly long and pretentious. And the questions at the end were horribly formed and incoherent for a native English speaker let alone a Japanese speaker. I expected a lot more from Harvard. However I enjoyed the architecture and the unique and interesting approach Kazoo and Rye take.