One problem with this theory is that matter cannot be created or destroyed. The information paradox says that black holes destroy information and your theory says that black holes create duplicate of information, which also should not be allowed to happen. I think that black holes are literally made of information, That being the star that it used to be. The radiation that comes from the black hole is actually just information being released back into space so nothing is actually lost. For example if you fall in a black hole, you would obviously die but your information would eventually come out at some point before the death of the black hole. The reason why you can’t see anything coming out of them is because the bits of information that come out are very small and also you can’t see pure information.
Concerning the no-cloning theorem, the authors claim that it is not violated: arxiv.org/abs/1310.7914 The holographic principle & ER = EPR, that's all not established physics and I don't think that it's needed in this derivation which merely uses conventional physics which is the neat thing about it.
If nothing can escape the black-hole, then how can it give off gravity? The gravity should itself be stopped from being emitted because it moves in the same manner as the light. The entire paradigm fails because they NEVER even considered this basic point of logic. The 2017 Nobel prize was awarded for claiming to observe 2 black-holes orbiting one another. In order to orbit, they must emit gravity. That "prize" was given for the claim that gravity moved at light-speed. Google "INSTANT GRAVITY PROOF" for numerous other proofs against this blatant pseudo-science and sophistry. This garbage verbiage in the 'video' aside.
I'm not sure what you mean by "give off gravity"? A black hole is a spacetime geometry solving the Einstein field equations. In the most simple case, it is a static radially symmetric geometry known as the Schwarzschild black hole. There is nothing wrong with gravitational waves travelling at the speed of light. These are perturbations of the geometry which carry energy and hence they can carry information, so they better don't exceed the speed of light, otherwise something would be wrong with General Relativity which is based on Special Relativity which is based on the speed of light limit. Before you call the work of Nobel Prize winners pseudo-science I recommend you to study General Relativity instead of using what you call "basic point of logic" which seems to be the attempt to explain the world merely based on Newtonian mechanics.
Gravity is not “emitted,” it is a geometric curvature in spacetime. Black holes are a proven fact, and have been for decades now. You gotta love community college dropouts who think they know more about physics than actual physicists.
One problem with this theory is that matter cannot be created or destroyed. The information paradox says that black holes destroy information and your theory says that black holes create duplicate of information, which also should not be allowed to happen. I think that black holes are literally made of information, That being the star that it used to be. The radiation that comes from the black hole is actually just information being released back into space so nothing is actually lost. For example if you fall in a black hole, you would obviously die but your information would eventually come out at some point before the death of the black hole. The reason why you can’t see anything coming out of them is because the bits of information that come out are very small and also you can’t see pure information.
You haven't put the name of the speaker in the title of description. Great vid though.
But what about the no cloning theorem & the holographic principle & ER = EPR etc. ?
Concerning the no-cloning theorem, the authors claim that it is not violated:
arxiv.org/abs/1310.7914
The holographic principle & ER = EPR, that's all not established physics and I don't think that it's needed in this derivation which merely uses conventional physics which is the neat thing about it.
@@NomenNominandum got ya ... thanks
If nothing can escape the black-hole, then how can it give off gravity?
The gravity should itself be stopped from being emitted because it moves in the same manner as the light.
The entire paradigm fails because they NEVER even considered this basic point of logic.
The 2017 Nobel prize was awarded for claiming to observe 2 black-holes orbiting one another.
In order to orbit, they must emit gravity.
That "prize" was given for the claim that gravity moved at light-speed.
Google "INSTANT GRAVITY PROOF"
for numerous other proofs against this blatant pseudo-science and sophistry.
This garbage verbiage in the 'video' aside.
I'm not sure what you mean by "give off gravity"? A black hole is a spacetime geometry solving the Einstein field equations. In the most simple case, it is a static radially symmetric geometry known as the Schwarzschild black hole.
There is nothing wrong with gravitational waves travelling at the speed of light. These are perturbations of the geometry which carry energy and hence they can carry information, so they better don't exceed the speed of light, otherwise something would be wrong with General Relativity which is based on Special Relativity which is based on the speed of light limit.
Before you call the work of Nobel Prize winners pseudo-science I recommend you to study General Relativity instead of using what you call "basic point of logic" which seems to be the attempt to explain the world merely based on Newtonian mechanics.
Gravity is not “emitted,” it is a geometric curvature in spacetime. Black holes are a proven fact, and have been for decades now.
You gotta love community college dropouts who think they know more about physics than actual physicists.
Seriously, you're saying dumb shit on this video too?