Sir, I agree with you. NONE of the old astrologers (reputed) used Nakshatras. They came up with highly accurate predictions with Rasi chart, Navamsha and other div charts.
@@jyothiananth6075 pls ask any Old astrologer. In my case, I knew some famous Kerala astrologers (Namboodiris) and they never mentioned nakshatras! It is used only for Moon's movements and for dashas. In BPHS only 3 or 4 places there is mention most specifically in Longevity slokas. Kindly read those. Thanks
@@jyothiananth6075 From where you get such out of the world logic? Just because division methodology is similar doesn't make Navamsa & nakshatra as same!!
Nakshatra classify our DNA & RNA in simple word they suggest who really we are from few past life and have nothing to do with astrology. It seems they were made to classify people Good , Better, Best based on Moon position. We are living in a changing world where things are changing fast.The best thing I find is to make your 10th house strong by doing good Karma and see rest of all will change automatically..Hare Krishna 😀
Guru Braha makes good points…However, why would many Indians see the valid use of nakshatras? I think we should consider what people like Sanjay Rath and other Indians may say about expanding on their use as an innovation from the the past with Jyotish… If one wishes to say it’s not relevant to it, so be it. If one doesn’t wish you respect it’s use so be it as well. Yet, to say it shouldn’t be done because it isn’t relevant that is judgment that is right for a person to have but with tolerance that people can do so as well. I see it this way, India is fortunate to have a diverse representations of God, I see no point in say the light of Jyotish is limited only in 7 colors. My teacher is showing his wisdom but also inability to see their innovation even in understanding the basics. Accuracy is in the eye of beholder…and even scientists are critical to the perspective of the observer who is using the tool of science.
To me, it's obvious the nakshatras must be powerful. The nakshatra ruler of the moon sets up your entire life via it's dasha periods. Imo Claire Nakti is the only one doing serious work with the nakshatras most don't know how to approach the subject properly.
It is a bit unusual that he would accent using the sutras so much, and sticking to rules of jyotish, while he uses outer planets, such as Neptune, Uranus and Pluto - which are not used in jyotish 🤔 So, basically, in the case of nakshatras, he is making a whole argument by explaining that one should stick specifically to the rules and texts, and also, using only 1 chart as proof - his own - but in the case of the outer planets, it is ok to not apply the rules and the sutras. I am not saying the man is wrong, but unfortunately, I do not think he makes a compelling argument 🤷♀️
Good point... Uranus, Neptune, Pluto, Moon are big and outer planets which controls global population... NOTHING TO DO WITH OUR PERSONAL SELF AND DAY TO DAY LIFE.... HE IS JUST ANOTHER HYPOCRITE!
Jyotish and nakshatras are not opposed, they are not different and they are not in contradiction. Dare I say regardless of their source originally, they both work to profound effects. Jyotish is akin to the foundation, structure and layout of a house. The nakshatra are the pictures on the walls, the colours of the artifacts within the house and the music playing in the background. How can one say one is more accurate than the other? How can one say because the structure of the house is found in an engineering textbook it is the most true? How can one deny the reality of the art and music in the house?? When it comes to astrology, like the honourable man said, you can't learn from the words of the teacher the best insights must come to you directly. When you look upon the sky at night, do you see any houses? Do you see any signs? Or do you simply see stars and the Grahas? I'd say the way the sky presents itself is the way Jyotish truly is, one coherent, clear and beautiful melody not bothered by the many divisions humans can conjure up regarding it. From which text says what, to who quotes it. All irrelevant under the face of the sky. Is it true? Does it work? Those are the only questions that truly matter.
His main point is to follow the evidence, no matter where it leads. The Truth has to be at the top of your belief hierachy and everything must be put at its service. Personal testimonies or personal results/Truths are an absolute no no when it comes to scientific research. We must avoid getting stuck in a loop of self conforming theories if we are willing to take up astrology seriously. To be a legit astrologer you absolutely must have a sceptic and a scientific mind. And that in itself is an incredibly difficult thing to find or attain. Even most scientists are bad at science. Almost all ideas that a human mind produces or have produced, are wrong.
🫤 Koolaid seems strong among the populous- Im questioning myself what is wrong with people?? Nakshatras are the core and key to understanding the Vedas and life patterns What kind of Non-sense is this?? Its actually heresy and disrespectful to The foundation of Jyotish . As it is through Nakshatras that makes Hindu/ Jyotish stand out as a light against all other forms of Astrology. The reason there are only few sentences written because the Nakshatra knowledge was sacred and given orally to keep it protected. Now its knowledge can stand as a light to its rightful keepers who safe guarded the knowledge. You should know this Sir! What kind of acting is this? Because Hindus were excellent keepers of historic records and time, it is clearly easy now to see where false hood and changing history came from. The Nakshatras reign supreme and make the knowledge of Hinduism have a solid foundation among any other doctrines that were forged. Sorry if my words seem offensive but this presentation was disturbing. Brandi Mikayla-
Well I was struggling to find an argument there. The one you are trying to make seems to be that we somehow wanted to keep it secret. Firstly, I would like some evidence for that claim. Secondly, if this knowledge was such a secret, then why mention it at all? Third and final point, so the current breed of astrologers are dabbling with something they have no knowledge of, that even the great sages decided to guard and protect. Now, either the sages were wrong in keeping this a secret. Or the current astrologers have no clue with what they are dealing with. You need to address this inevitable conclusion of your line of argumentation.
Everybody is a hero nowadays.... And ofcourse an enlightened being! Everybody coming up with their own theories....😁🏆🎖️🏅🥇 How dare this character can DELETE nakshatras????????? The very basis and foundation of consciousness hehe🤭🤭
Thanks for this video. Agree to what James said. These days just because everyone wants to show himself as some unique astrologer, they unnecessarily complicate things which are not required at first place. Lagna & Navamsa chart are enough for experienced good astrologers to give solutions & predictions.
I'd just like to add here that Mr. Braha did mention two Nakshatras that made the normal functioning of planets difficult. He did say in another interview that in some readings, for example, he predicted a great period for the Jupiter Mahadasha because it was exalted in Cancer. However, it did not turn out to be true for the native. He said the reason was because the planet was in either Vishaka or Ashlesha. These two Nakshatras somehow distort how the planet should normally function. But doesn't go to prove that Nakshatras do have an astrological impact?
Always loved practical approach of james. May be thats the reason he does not speak highly of nakshatras as they are not that important for personal horoscopy. But thats not a reason to not study nakshatras. For example, bharani clearly explains james. Mother had difficulties, he is in a spiritual field, difficult childhood, good with money etc.
I may agree on some points but not all of them. If something doesn't work for someone to exclude is validity totally when is working for someone else is not correct, maybe the teacher or that school does not use the proper techniques. I love Varshaphala, I could not live without it ,I may say that 80% of accuracy with my techniques and Tropical rasis. About ayanamnsa and Naksatra padas; that is something to think, some astrologers tend to use them like butter and bread..... personally I do use Naksatras only for dasas... Anyway Braha has a lot of experience that is something to be very appreciated and is a very charismatic speaker and behaves like an actor :-)
Whatever thing has been said in this session is absolutely correct.....I am also a astrologer having 7 years of experience in this field ....for example if 10th House lord is in Ashlesha nakshatra than you can tell the field in which that person will work but questions like 1) when I will get the job....2) may I get government jobs etc these questions cannot be answered through nakshatra
I’ve also got a book by Dane Rudyar and didn’t understand a thing! I am also very confused as to which way to go..western Vedic I am leaning toward Vedic with tropical calculation like Ernst Wilhelm does ….but I am not sure 🙈
This video makes zero sense nakshatras are more than archetypes and sounds like he's just trying to discredit people finding sense with nakshatras becuase someone with anuradha in one house for example will not have the same or experience as someone with it in a different house. This is western astrology not vedic
Whatever thing has been said in this session is absolutely correct.....I am also a astrologer having 7 years of experience in this field ....for example if 10th House lord is in Ashlesha nakshatra than you can tell the field in which that person will work but questions like 1) when I will get the job....2) may I get government jobs etc these questions cannot be answered through nakshatra
Mentioned zero sutras. I respect your opinion but completely disagree nakshatras are literally what separate vedic from tropical. Also sutras say nakshatras give results, your experience does not invalidate othrr great astrologers and their experiences this is actually we ppl arr starting to leave tropical and western based astrology and going to vedic. Using vedic like how tropical does also doesn't work...
Whatever thing has been said in this session is absolutely correct.....I am also a astrologer having 7 years of experience in this field ....for example if 10th House lord is in Ashlesha nakshatra than you can tell the field in which that person will work but questions like 1) when I will get the job....2) may I get government jobs etc these questions cannot be answered through nakshatra
Not a single sutra mentioned by him, was aspectinig atleast few which I could applied and checked whether they are working or not, all blabbering and simple blabbering 😆
You two look so good together... Honestly, you two look so hot for each other, agreeing to each other... You two have great chemistry and understands each other so much!!! While he is talkative and chatty, you are a quiet receptive absorber, learner of new informations... And then when u speak Ma'am, he gets u instantly. You find him little crazy or erratic and u admire this, he is funny... And you as usual is a very receptive woman... ♋ Like.... Soo beautiful!!
James is simply brilliant & honest. This is one of the rare beings in this age.
I must admit this man is very candid about things other astrologers wont dare to say.
Thank you
Sir, I agree with you. NONE of the old astrologers (reputed) used Nakshatras. They came up with highly accurate predictions with Rasi chart, Navamsha and other div charts.
Navamsha is nothing but nakshatra pada..
@@jyothiananth6075 pls ask any Old astrologer. In my case, I knew some famous Kerala astrologers (Namboodiris) and they never mentioned nakshatras! It is used only for Moon's movements and for dashas. In BPHS only 3 or 4 places there is mention most specifically in Longevity slokas. Kindly read those. Thanks
Many thanks.
@@jyothiananth6075 From where you get such out of the world logic? Just because division methodology is similar doesn't make Navamsa & nakshatra as same!!
True, thanks for confirmation.
Nakshatra classify our DNA & RNA in simple word they suggest who really we are from few past life and have nothing to do with astrology. It seems they were made to classify people Good , Better, Best based on Moon position.
We are living in a changing world where things are changing fast.The best thing I find is to make your 10th house strong by doing good Karma and see rest of all will change automatically..Hare Krishna 😀
Guru Braha makes good points…However, why would many Indians see the valid use of nakshatras? I think we should consider what people like Sanjay Rath and other Indians may say about expanding on their use as an innovation from the the past with Jyotish…
If one wishes to say it’s not relevant to it, so be it. If one doesn’t wish you respect it’s use so be it as well.
Yet, to say it shouldn’t be done because it isn’t relevant that is judgment that is right for a person to have but with tolerance that people can do so as well.
I see it this way, India is fortunate to have a diverse representations of God, I see no point in say the light of Jyotish is limited only in 7 colors.
My teacher is showing his wisdom but also inability to see their innovation even in understanding the basics.
Accuracy is in the eye of beholder…and even scientists are critical to the perspective of the observer who is using the tool of science.
To me, it's obvious the nakshatras must be powerful. The nakshatra ruler of the moon sets up your entire life via it's dasha periods. Imo Claire Nakti is the only one doing serious work with the nakshatras most don't know how to approach the subject properly.
When an astrologer cannot predict anything which is the case more often than not, they try to bamboozle you with esoteric concepts of nakshatra, etc.
Always enlightening His word Nakastra I feel it’s for pinpointing the event 🙏
Thanks a lot
It is a bit unusual that he would accent using the sutras so much, and sticking to rules of jyotish, while he uses outer planets, such as Neptune, Uranus and Pluto - which are not used in jyotish 🤔
So, basically, in the case of nakshatras, he is making a whole argument by explaining that one should stick specifically to the rules and texts, and also, using only 1 chart as proof - his own - but in the case of the outer planets, it is ok to not apply the rules and the sutras.
I am not saying the man is wrong, but unfortunately, I do not think he makes a compelling argument 🤷♀️
Good point... Uranus, Neptune, Pluto, Moon are big and outer planets which controls global population... NOTHING TO DO WITH OUR PERSONAL SELF AND DAY TO DAY LIFE.... HE IS JUST ANOTHER HYPOCRITE!
Jyotish and nakshatras are not opposed, they are not different and they are not in contradiction. Dare I say regardless of their source originally, they both work to profound effects.
Jyotish is akin to the foundation, structure and layout of a house. The nakshatra are the pictures on the walls, the colours of the artifacts within the house and the music playing in the background. How can one say one is more accurate than the other? How can one say because the structure of the house is found in an engineering textbook it is the most true? How can one deny the reality of the art and music in the house??
When it comes to astrology, like the honourable man said, you can't learn from the words of the teacher the best insights must come to you directly. When you look upon the sky at night, do you see any houses? Do you see any signs? Or do you simply see stars and the Grahas?
I'd say the way the sky presents itself is the way Jyotish truly is, one coherent, clear and beautiful melody not bothered by the many divisions humans can conjure up regarding it. From which text says what, to who quotes it. All irrelevant under the face of the sky.
Is it true? Does it work? Those are the only questions that truly matter.
His main point is to follow the evidence, no matter where it leads. The Truth has to be at the top of your belief hierachy and everything must be put at its service. Personal testimonies or personal results/Truths are an absolute no no when it comes to scientific research. We must avoid getting stuck in a loop of self conforming theories if we are willing to take up astrology seriously. To be a legit astrologer you absolutely must have a sceptic and a scientific mind. And that in itself is an incredibly difficult thing to find or attain. Even most scientists are bad at science.
Almost all ideas that a human mind produces or have produced, are wrong.
Each one has a right to his/her own opinion according to their personal experience. Please honor it🙏
They say Kali Yuga is age of ignorance... one example is right here.
Naxatras links to Vedic astrology are tenuous and over-generalized at best!❤
🫤 Koolaid seems strong among the populous- Im questioning myself what is wrong with people?? Nakshatras are the core and key to understanding the Vedas and life patterns
What kind of Non-sense is this?? Its actually heresy and disrespectful to The foundation of Jyotish . As it is through Nakshatras that makes Hindu/ Jyotish stand out as a light against all other forms of Astrology. The reason there are only few sentences written because the Nakshatra knowledge was sacred and given orally to keep it protected. Now its knowledge can stand as a light to its rightful keepers who safe guarded the knowledge.
You should know this Sir! What kind of acting is this? Because Hindus were excellent keepers of historic records and time, it is clearly easy now to see where false hood and changing history came from. The Nakshatras reign supreme and make the knowledge of Hinduism have a solid foundation among any other doctrines that were forged. Sorry if my words seem offensive but this presentation was disturbing.
Brandi Mikayla-
Well I was struggling to find an argument there. The one you are trying to make seems to be that we somehow wanted to keep it secret.
Firstly, I would like some evidence for that claim.
Secondly, if this knowledge was such a secret, then why mention it at all?
Third and final point, so the current breed of astrologers are dabbling with something they have no knowledge of, that even the great sages decided to guard and protect. Now, either the sages were wrong in keeping this a secret. Or the current astrologers have no clue with what they are dealing with. You need to address this inevitable conclusion of your line of argumentation.
Everybody is a hero nowadays.... And ofcourse an enlightened being!
Everybody coming up with their own theories....😁🏆🎖️🏅🥇
How dare this character can DELETE nakshatras????????? The very basis and foundation of consciousness hehe🤭🤭
Thanks for this video. Agree to what James said. These days just because everyone wants to show himself as some unique astrologer, they unnecessarily complicate things which are not required at first place. Lagna & Navamsa chart are enough for experienced good astrologers to give solutions & predictions.
Thank you
I'd just like to add here that Mr. Braha did mention two Nakshatras that made the normal functioning of planets difficult. He did say in another interview that in some readings, for example, he predicted a great period for the Jupiter Mahadasha because it was exalted in Cancer. However, it did not turn out to be true for the native. He said the reason was because the planet was in either Vishaka or Ashlesha. These two Nakshatras somehow distort how the planet should normally function. But doesn't go to prove that Nakshatras do have an astrological impact?
Always loved practical approach of james. May be thats the reason he does not speak highly of nakshatras as they are not that important for personal horoscopy. But thats not a reason to not study nakshatras. For example, bharani clearly explains james. Mother had difficulties, he is in a spiritual field, difficult childhood, good with money etc.
Thank you
Marvelous
Thanks a ton
I may agree on some points but not all of them. If something doesn't work for someone to exclude is validity totally when is working for someone else is not correct, maybe the teacher or that school does not use the proper techniques. I love Varshaphala, I could not live without it ,I may say that 80% of accuracy with my techniques and Tropical rasis. About ayanamnsa and Naksatra padas; that is something to think, some astrologers tend to use them like butter and bread..... personally I do use Naksatras only for dasas... Anyway Braha has a lot of experience that is something to be very appreciated and is a very charismatic speaker and behaves like an actor :-)
💎✨
Nakshatras are based on the moon thag doesn't mean u can't apply it to ascendant, in fact many very capable astrologers use nakshatras ...
Whatever thing has been said in this session is absolutely correct.....I am also a astrologer having 7 years of experience in this field ....for example if 10th House lord is in Ashlesha nakshatra than you can tell the field in which that person will work but questions like 1) when I will get the job....2) may I get government jobs etc these questions cannot be answered through nakshatra
I’ve also got a book by Dane Rudyar and didn’t understand a thing!
I am also very confused as to which way to go..western Vedic
I am leaning toward Vedic with tropical calculation like Ernst Wilhelm does ….but I am not sure 🙈
This video makes zero sense nakshatras are more than archetypes and sounds like he's just trying to discredit people finding sense with nakshatras becuase someone with anuradha in one house for example will not have the same or experience as someone with it in a different house. This is western astrology not vedic
Whatever thing has been said in this session is absolutely correct.....I am also a astrologer having 7 years of experience in this field ....for example if 10th House lord is in Ashlesha nakshatra than you can tell the field in which that person will work but questions like 1) when I will get the job....2) may I get government jobs etc these questions cannot be answered through nakshatra
Please add your video English subtitles
Please go to transcript
Merci
Interesting. Not sure how I feel about this. But would this mean that using nakshatras for our mind state/mental states (following the moon) is ok?
Mentioned zero sutras. I respect your opinion but completely disagree nakshatras are literally what separate vedic from tropical. Also sutras say nakshatras give results, your experience does not invalidate othrr great astrologers and their experiences this is actually we ppl arr starting to leave tropical and western based astrology and going to vedic. Using vedic like how tropical does also doesn't work...
Whatever thing has been said in this session is absolutely correct.....I am also a astrologer having 7 years of experience in this field ....for example if 10th House lord is in Ashlesha nakshatra than you can tell the field in which that person will work but questions like 1) when I will get the job....2) may I get government jobs etc these questions cannot be answered through nakshatra
I think you should use more props James🤪
Not a single sutra mentioned by him, was aspectinig atleast few which I could applied and checked whether they are working or not, all blabbering and simple blabbering 😆
@megha ji no where it's mentioned he is discussing sutras
Please watch the video again and what he has given u can't even imagine...
Loved it!! Haha!!😆🚩
You two look so good together... Honestly, you two look so hot for each other, agreeing to each other... You two have great chemistry and understands each other so much!!!
While he is talkative and chatty, you are a quiet receptive absorber, learner of new informations... And then when u speak Ma'am, he gets u instantly.
You find him little crazy or erratic and u admire this, he is funny... And you as usual is a very receptive woman... ♋ Like.... Soo beautiful!!