Dynamics 16.7 Relative Acceleration

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 2 лис 2013

КОМЕНТАРІ • 21

  • @sibusisosithole9778
    @sibusisosithole9778 6 років тому +5

    WOW!! You're really great!, Thank God i found this channel. Please keep up the great work dear Sir.

  • @TheDomo101
    @TheDomo101 7 років тому

    Wish I would've found your video's sooner! Thanks a lot for the help, truly appreciated :)

  • @DartSlinger
    @DartSlinger 7 років тому

    Thank you SO much! This really helped me prepare for my Mechanisms and Kinematics final.

  • @scottyhungry75
    @scottyhungry75 10 років тому +1

    That was a really nice explanation. Thank you

  • @hamzanaeem9212
    @hamzanaeem9212 9 років тому +1

    Good job! made my concepts clear

  • @kimberlyw2591
    @kimberlyw2591 5 років тому +1

    Really wishing I had found your channel before T-3 hours to my final but better late than never

  • @tsavage5447
    @tsavage5447 5 років тому

    You are amazing!

  • @clashandhaggard
    @clashandhaggard 6 років тому

    thank you for this presentation.

  • @blexaarron
    @blexaarron 6 років тому

    Good example that hits every point.

  • @abdullah12319
    @abdullah12319 7 років тому

    Simple and clear explaination. Thank you very much

  • @abdalhalimzeineldeen1705
    @abdalhalimzeineldeen1705 5 років тому

    thank you, sir, you are amazing

  • @hubaibkhan7658
    @hubaibkhan7658 5 років тому +1

    Thank you Very much Sir. It was extremely helpful.

  • @edgargarza4791
    @edgargarza4791 3 роки тому

    very very clear!

  • @0568588527
    @0568588527 6 років тому

    God bless you

  • @mangolekale
    @mangolekale 3 роки тому +1

    Ok

  • @khavinvaing9952
    @khavinvaing9952 6 років тому

    May I know the book that you use, please?

    • @valeriecannon1787
      @valeriecannon1787 6 років тому +1

      Hibbeler Dynamics: Older Version of the Book not the 14th edition

  • @abdalhalimzeineldeen1705
    @abdalhalimzeineldeen1705 5 років тому

    anybody have the solution manual of this book ?????

  • @yojarroyo4046
    @yojarroyo4046 7 років тому

    why Wbc is pointing in that direction?

    • @claramelb7476
      @claramelb7476 4 роки тому +1

      He assumed the direction. If you assumed Wbc is CW you would have gotten a negative answer, which just means that your assumed direction (CW) is the other way (CCW)

  • @normanny7760
    @normanny7760 5 років тому

    i think the alpha is wrong
    (normal acceleration of point b should be -1.2j nt -7.2j