EYG a predictable, and useful, programming language by Peter Saxton

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 26 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 7

  • @000dr0g
    @000dr0g 8 днів тому +1

    truly inspiring. I listened to your podcast episode with Richard Feldman this morning, and I knew I had to learn more about your work. I love your separation of concrete syntax , AST and deployment contexts, since I have very strong opinions about syntax, but love even more to see the advances in semantics and their deployment. Brilliant!

  • @craftvscruft8060
    @craftvscruft8060 Місяць тому +6

    I'd been hoping to see more about EYG, thanks for hosting this!

  • @AQUTENOLEJ
    @AQUTENOLEJ Місяць тому +2

    I'm only 13:00 in, but, I think I'm having a hard time understanding what this is... is it just another functional language (a la haskell)? And what do you mean by "It has no syntax", 😅 I feel like everything i've seen was "syntax" . In any case, I am quite intrigued...

    • @petersaxton5183
      @petersaxton5183 Місяць тому +1

      I think a better statement than "no syntax" is to probably say "no parser". The program is saved as a JSON representation of the AST and not a source text file.

    • @AQUTENOLEJ
      @AQUTENOLEJ Місяць тому

      @@petersaxton5183 ahhhh! I see... that makes more sense to me (and it aligns with what we're seeing). I actually think thats quite interesting.... kinda like a batteries not included lsp starter. I dig it... I think the EYG team (probably just this guy? 🤔) need to do better messaging for their product though. Without the demo, I dont know if I'd even explore this project tbf.

  • @JoyceCrowder-n5w
    @JoyceCrowder-n5w Місяць тому

    Murphy Burgs

  • @Minhnhan89
    @Minhnhan89 25 днів тому

    Helo Chào ❤