2018 Soldering Microscope Comparison

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 1 жов 2024
  • Andonstar ADSM302 HD Microscope
    amzn.to/2CfmUvh
    suo.im/3KYdli
    Andonstar ADSM201 HD Microscope
    amzn.to/2CuRjsG
    Use this link to get $5 off your PCBWAY order of PCBs: www.pcbway.com...
    Here's an additional coupon code for $10, just enter 1ec9d870 after registering. The stainless steel stencil used in this video was only $10 so that's basically a free stencil.
    Koolerton 2.3” Microscope
    amzn.to/2CxyRQo
    Koolerton 4.3” Microscope
    amzn.to/2Cfmo0j
    Links to Equipment Shown in the Video:
    Helping Hand: amzn.to/2Ew5KLe
    Claw Clamp: amzn.to/2EwNAt0
    Camera Mount: amzn.to/2lDKDhI
    PCB Hotplate: amzn.to/2CuIjEg
    Hot Air SMD Rework Station: amzn.to/2CmEQs1
    Solder Paste: amzn.to/2C86h4G
    Soldering Iron: amzn.to/2EtFhOF
    Solder Wick: amzn.to/2C6Opaf
    Osciloscope: amzn.to/2CA6i2d
    195W Lab Power Supply: amzn.to/2C7ZsjF
    Spectrum Analyzer: amzn.to/2Ew9xYY
    SMD Tweezers: amzn.to/2Co7OHW
    Wire Racks I made my Bench with: amzn.to/2Cqj7yB
    See my instructables account for step by step guides to some of my projects: www.instructabl...
    Please support my channel to help me make more videos: / protog42
    FOLLOW:
    / protog42
    / protog42
    / protog42
  • Наука та технологія

КОМЕНТАРІ • 260

  • @trainingtheworld5093
    @trainingtheworld5093 5 років тому +106

    Some of the comments here are just plain mean. I thought this was a great video and it helped me. There are so many of these Chinese cameras out there and to see someone review them who is actually a technician is very helpful. Keep up the good work!

    • @ProtoG42
      @ProtoG42  5 років тому +11

      Thank you! I try not to let those type of comments get to me.

    • @jamesbrown2163
      @jamesbrown2163 5 років тому +8

      @@ProtoG42 Excellent review. I appreciate the effort you made. Ignore the dickheads. Well done Sir.

  • @mikeselectricstuff
    @mikeselectricstuff 6 років тому +9

    For a microscope for working (vs. inspection), latency and focus depth are more important than image quality. I bougtht a cheapo one to try & the latency is so bad it induces tremors as the brain tries to correct for the delayed image

    • @ProtoG42
      @ProtoG42  6 років тому +2

      mikeselectricstuff the two poor quality units had a noticeable latency. I did not notice any with the two andonstar units. I solder directly through the screen with them without any issues. What’s the best way to measure the latency? Film a stop watch?

    • @zaprodk
      @zaprodk 6 років тому

      I just shot a video of me turning on the lights and counting frames until the LCD updates. In 5 frames the LCD is updated partway, and after 6 frames a full update is done. So a delay of 240ms - not bad, not good either.

    • @mikiex
      @mikiex 5 років тому

      @@zaprodk Is that a good test? These cameras adapt based on the light is not an indication of the latency in normal use. The frame rate will probably decrease the lower light you use as it compensates exposure.

    • @zaprodk
      @zaprodk 5 років тому +1

      @@mikiex The "test" i did was with normal lab lighting + the two supplied lamps for reference.

    • @mikiex
      @mikiex 5 років тому

      @@zaprodk Which scope did you test?

  • @BrunoPOWEEER
    @BrunoPOWEEER 6 років тому +28

    Ohhhh I've been looking for a descent microscope for sometime and kinda gave up as I only found cheap&nasty or super expensive $3000+
    I'm LOVED this Andostar 302 HD.. looks like they've got everything right and a good price too (this is not expensive, it could easily cost 10x or more)
    Thanks for this reeeeeeally good and honest review... so much POWEEEEEERRR

    • @ProtoG42
      @ProtoG42  6 років тому +2

      Thanks man!

    • @scotshabalam2432
      @scotshabalam2432 5 років тому

      you can get a basic Amscope for 250, a much upgraded one at 600, or one with all the bells and whistles for 1000.

  • @vicv9503
    @vicv9503 5 років тому +7

    Thank you for this! but how about lag? do they have lag in the video? good job man

  • @agepbiz
    @agepbiz 5 років тому +2

    Nice review! Do you know if those resolutions are true resolution or if there is some shady upscaling going on like you often see on the cheapest cameras/microscopes?

  • @Chroniquesdemaker
    @Chroniquesdemaker 6 років тому +5

    Hi, can you tell me about where you bought your red magnetic stand for your microscope (G600) the first left with its forceps?
    Thank you

    • @deanschepers1188
      @deanschepers1188 4 роки тому

      Want to know also? Nice vid!!

    • @ProtoG42
      @ProtoG42  4 роки тому +1

      @@deanschepers1188 I used one Indicator holder: amzn.to/2Ew5KLe
      and attached one Claw Clamp: amzn.to/2EwNAt0
      I use these clamps for anything someone would use a helping hand for.

  • @robinrixon5241
    @robinrixon5241 4 роки тому +2

    I found this video extremely helpful and one of the best on UA-cam to compare these types of microscopes, which led me to get the even larger (but same camera) AD407 - however - I wish Andonstar would give real specifications instead of telling you what magnification you can get on a screen they don't supply (up to 270x on a 27" screen?). Unfortunately they also fail to tell you the minimum magnification you can expect - I'm an electronics hobbyist, and for the majority of soldering I do, 2-3x zoom would be great, otherwise I'll always be moving the work around - at full height, with the camera mounted on the lower lens ring, you will only see about 25-30mm of PCB - I could not view a whole Wemos D1 chip on screen at minimum zoom. For a product sold to aid with electronics (and clearly not aimed at professionals), the magnification offered feels far too high.

  • @talclipse
    @talclipse 5 років тому +3

    I graduated to a andonstar 302 from a 201.i used the 201 for several months and it does a fantastic job but i gotta say the 302 is leaps and bounds better not just a tad better.
    If you are spending more then $50 for a 201 just do yourself a favor and spend the extra $150 for the 302 cause its worth every single penny.

  • @learnelectronics
    @learnelectronics 6 років тому +3

    I have the Mustek G600 from Banggood, which I believe is the same microscope as the Koolertron 4.3.
    Nice video.

    • @ProtoG42
      @ProtoG42  6 років тому

      Yeah, that unit seems to be generic with several brand names. Thanks for watching!

    • @Nclght
      @Nclght 5 років тому

      @@ProtoG42 I have that one as well but I hate the base.... i can't seem to get a good understanding of the arm you are using.. which are the parts you used. Thanks Great video!

    • @ronalddavis
      @ronalddavis 3 роки тому +1

      @@Nclght that is a magnetic base for a dial indicator . the arm is called an indicator holder and looks like a noga knockoff

  • @deaultusername
    @deaultusername 6 років тому +16

    first 3 really look like modified dash cams, 1st one basically is.

    • @BillAnt
      @BillAnt 5 років тому

      You see, any way you cut it or dice it, one has to spend around $300-$500 for a really good optical binocular scope like an Amscope or Minvision. There are lots of drawbacks with these "cheap" ones, like lower quality sensors, narrow optical magnification if any (digital gets fuzzy), lack of working distance, and a slight video lag which some people can never get used to (myself included). These are just toys, as you've said more like modified dash cams. The old adage "You get what you pay for, certainly hold true when it comes to scopes. ;)

    • @charleshines6155
      @charleshines6155 4 роки тому

      I once had a cheap dash camera. It is easily worth it to get a known good one. Look for reviews. Don't pay any mind to the plainly obvious fake reviews that where they sound like some ecstatic old lady is dancing around singing their praises but the real ones that simply say if it was any good. Who knows you might see a ton of reviews that say JUNK, DO NOT BUY or something similar.

  • @wa9kzy326
    @wa9kzy326 5 років тому +4

    Great comparison video.. Exactly what I was looking for. Currently, I use an 8 Mpixel that produces an excellent picture. I use it professionally, on a shoestring budget. It was about $100 on Amazon. The pix appears on the computer screen. I did have to make a custom mount for it to be useful.The overall problem I have with all of these is that they produce a 2-D image, no depth perception. I did get "used" to it, but. I'm used to 3-D with a stereo microscope, but at 2kilobucks. I'm waiting for a VR hood for the stereo USB microscope.BTW, another reason why the advertised resolution is not met, is that the salespeople just plain have no clue what they're talking about.Thanks again.

  • @iMsMs
    @iMsMs 6 років тому +9

    Im really digging the Andonstar ADSM 302 HD. Bit pricey but the output quality is just amazing. Thank you for the review!

    • @ProtoG42
      @ProtoG42  6 років тому +1

      Yeah, it's awesome. Thanks man!

    • @hiteshsahu_
      @hiteshsahu_ 4 роки тому

      @@ProtoG42
      Is this their official website ? www.andonstar.com/

  • @martindoppelbauer7738
    @martindoppelbauer7738 2 роки тому +1

    The Levenhuk DTX rc3 actually has a 3 megapixel camera. It can produce 12 megapixel pictures but they are really just blown up and do not contain more information than 3 mp pictures.

  • @systemfive7
    @systemfive7 6 років тому +5

    Great stuff! Was looking for a decent microscope for smd work, and this was just what I needed to see! Thanks!

  • @ProtoG42
    @ProtoG42  6 років тому

    Use this link to get $5 off your PCBWAY order of PCBs: www.pcbway.com/setinvite.aspx?inviteid=57699
    Here's an additional coupon code for $10, just enter 1ec9d870 after registering. The stainless steel stencil used in this video was only $10 so that's basically a free stencil.

  • @ddimov2557
    @ddimov2557 6 років тому +5

    Hi there, thanks 10x for this review! Comes in handy as I am looking for a soldering microscope.
    Question: Does Andostar ADSM302 have any latency in the video?
    With other words, say you are soldering under the microscope, do you feel any delay between soldering and this being visualised on the screen for you. Do you need to artificially slow down yourself down in order to see/get soldering right or this latency completely unnoticeable? Is there any difference in the latency between the build in screen/monitor/USB?

  • @the_socompsp
    @the_socompsp 5 років тому +3

    MP (mega-pixel) IS important depending on what youre doing with the images.. if you are using them to look over the pic it took for faults and such then you would want a high MP cause that gives you a better ability to zoom in onto the pic after it has been taken, basically the higher the MP then the further you'll be able to zoom in before it starts to get fuzzy/loss of detail.

  • @stevenx3m
    @stevenx3m 6 років тому +1

    Both Andonstar models you show have 3MPx sensors and just upscale to 12MPx photos. The 302 model showed better photo, because of more magnification and you just had different angle of the light. When filming open microchip reflected light changes how it looks dramatically. Probably the lens is a little better, but overall it is not much different. Unfortunately both Andonstar models output only 720p to PC over USB. 1080p is only on HDMI. What I like on the 203 is the large enough display for actual work. I am still deciding which one to buy, but I guess it will be the 201 model as it is half the price or 302 and not that much worse if you use PC or monitor.

  • @modelllichtsysteme
    @modelllichtsysteme 4 роки тому +3

    Thank you for this review! It helped me a lot!

  • @sydmichel
    @sydmichel 6 років тому +1

    You seem to talk about the quality of "pictures" a lot but to be honest as a soldering aid I am not interested in how well it takes pictures. I need to know what it is like in use whilst soldering. ie, is there a decent working distance? Is there any latency between the camera and screen? Is the stand stable? will it maintain focus in use? what is the clarity of the screen in use?
    If there is going to be a part 2 to this comparison, could you please demonstrate the microscopes in use as soldering microscopes.
    I bought a cheap "soldering" microscope, the USB type that you plug into a computer and it was as much use as a chocolate coffee pot. The colors are off, it won't stay in focus, it wobbles all over the place in use and worst of all there is about a 200-millisecond latency on it. It's absolutely terrible.
    So I have ordered a good old-fashioned optical microscope for soldering work.instead. It has X20 and X40 lenses, a good focal distance and a good solid stand.

  • @ipadize
    @ipadize 3 роки тому +1

    12:12 thats a no brainer. Being able to have this much travel (or free space) will allow you to easily put a hot air gun between the microscope and the pcb

  • @RandomHacks
    @RandomHacks 6 років тому +4

    Nice comparison. I made an LED ring light that works with both andonstar microscopes and I also use a microphone boom arm instead of the original stand, you might like to check the videos on my channel.
    I added a battery to my adsm201, it has the pads for the battery on the PCB so you can just solder a small lithium battery, it's not that I need to use it outside or anything, it's mainly because the settings would reset everytime I disconnected the power. The adsm302 although it also can take a battery inside it already has a small backup battery to save the settings.

  • @the_eminent_Joshua_E_Hrouda
    @the_eminent_Joshua_E_Hrouda 5 років тому +1

    Great review. But not enough close ups of super tiny things. Can you find a 01005 SMD to zoom in on?? Or better: 008004. I'd like to see how close it can make them appear

  • @avejst
    @avejst 6 років тому +4

    Thanks for sharing 😀👍, I have thought about buying one of those microcops 👍

  • @ProtoG42
    @ProtoG42  6 років тому

    Here are more photos of a 2cm wide board taken with the 4 units:
    Andonstar ADSM302 taken @ 20.5cm i.imgur.com/uzFEcRA.jpg
    Andonstar ADSM201 taken @ 12cm i.imgur.com/Zh7Pf5I.jpg
    2.5" "Koolertron" Microscope taken @ 11cm with no light i.imgur.com/cVwB9KZ.jpg
    2.5" "Koolertron" Microscope taken @ 11cm with light at lowest setting i.imgur.com/gLUf2KR.jpg
    4.3" "Koolertron" Microscope taken @ 21cm i.imgur.com/9HJ58hx.jpg

  • @Nick-zp7hk
    @Nick-zp7hk 6 років тому +5

    Thank you very much for your time !!! Super !!!

    • @ProtoG42
      @ProtoG42  6 років тому

      Thanks for watching!

  • @decem_unosquattro9538
    @decem_unosquattro9538 3 роки тому

    I think its hard not to take a kick back.
    🤣👍🏻
    I mean if it was me what would I do?
    Geezez. 😆😂
    I'll just take the money.😎
    Ok cue the Bob Segar "Old time rock and roll.

  • @SteveStoltz
    @SteveStoltz 6 років тому +1

    I have the Andonstar ADSM201, and although it does record full 1080 when using the USB, the HDMI out is only 720 regardless of what it is set to. I was a little disappointed in that since using it with a 1080 monitor was my primary intention, the 720 still looks good but it wasn't what I paid for. Also there seems to be an issue with windows 7, I could get it to record but the program got an error trying to use the preview screen. In Linux it worked without a hitch, i must say there is a lot of lag though.

  •  2 роки тому

    Hello, thanks for the share. Can you tell me if it´s possible to have via HDMI only the image, without timer, icons, etc. I am thinking about use this ANDONSTAR AD407 for a art perfomance and I am looking for only the image. thank you very much.

  • @tomc.7353
    @tomc.7353 6 років тому +4

    What is minimum magnification of ADSM 302, 301, and 201?

  • @crashsitetube
    @crashsitetube 6 років тому +1

    I looked this microscope up up on ebay (price seems to range $300 - $400 US) and the spec does show a 12 MP photo resolution...but, also a 3 MP image sensor. The image looks really good in your video but, I really do question the interpolating of pixels. Thoughts?

    • @salaphysics6558
      @salaphysics6558 Рік тому

      @David - My own vision is limited and I didn't purchase one but, I agree with the presenter that the last microscope seems the best overall and the cost for all are very reasonable (I mean it's not like any of them are $50k - 100k or some crazy price tag like that).

  • @riccardoz2953
    @riccardoz2953 4 роки тому +2

    Thanks for the comparison of those 4 model. i really appreciated u used same items and show how it looks from each video.. thanks!

  • @ralfsautomotive
    @ralfsautomotive 3 роки тому

    Seems that cheap crap from china just is no good. Some people don't realize how much better resolution works when your eyes aren't that good anymore. I wear glasses and my eyes are tired and bad so a crisp resolution with a bigger screen is worth the money to me. Glad I found this video cause I was about to order a $40 one.

  • @mr2000jp
    @mr2000jp 2 роки тому

    i bought it g1200 , and used it for a month , and i regret it , the image quality is very bad , it never gives good balance between light and dark areas , the light is refleced directly to the camera when working with cicuit boards or electronics repairs , cannot see the parts clearly and the colors is not clear too , cannot tell if there is some thing dicolored or burned ,
    and after a month or so of usage , it died , it doesnt turn on , i opened it and tested the board , i found the circuit board to be shorting on the power area next to the charger port , and its poor design seems to have failed in short time because it generates lots of heat while it doesnt have and proper cooling ,
    its one of the worst microscopes in the market and no matter what price you pay for it , doesnt worth it
    never buy this model , you will end up throwing it in trash

    • @ProtoG42
      @ProtoG42  2 роки тому

      You seem like a bright, intelligent person! Please find the manufacturer and send them what you wrote; albeit modified a bit to make it more personal and specific. They will most likely send you a free replacement but the more important part is to let them know about the defects so they can potentially solve them. Voicing constructive criticism is great because you are helping other people avoid the mistake that you learned the hard way. The model I have is still working but I prefer my other microscopes as well. Don’t let people tell you that you get what you pay for. Products should not be defective; regardless of the price. Friendly reminder; a lesson learned should be a lesson shared! Have a good day bud!

  • @primus711
    @primus711 6 років тому +1

    i have the 1st andonstar from years ago 1600x1200 which had no lcd and was 15fps def getting on the 302 now

  • @aleksandardimitrijevic6575
    @aleksandardimitrijevic6575 6 років тому +2

    Nice review, lots of useful info.
    P.S.
    If AvE see you didn't assemble the ruler, shes gonna release the shmoooooo... :D

  • @takismail
    @takismail 6 років тому +1

    just got a cheap one as i only use for free friends repair work, waiting for it, but sure will suck.

  • @ThriftyToolShed
    @ThriftyToolShed 5 років тому +1

    Great video on the cheaper microscopes available. I actually use the first one you showed, it is cheap and cheaply made but it is very useful for me and I have used it on several electronics repair videos. If you look hard enough you can find it available with the silver ajustable stand up like the 3rd one you showed. I would love to have one like the 302 you showed. It looks really good. The older I get the more I love these little digital microscopes!

  • @choppergirl
    @choppergirl 3 роки тому

    The magnification on these looks to be too large to be usuable for reading bills, checks, mail, or books.
    I solder with a TS100, but I'm getting tired of all these reviews focusing on reading a number off a chip or looking at SMD components, when I would never use it for that. If something requires SMD soldering of components so tiny they were placed on there by an automated robot, it gets thrown away. I want to be able to be able to read my power bill and write out a check, not read a number off a RAm chip.

  • @tassie7325
    @tassie7325 Рік тому

    I don't understand why the ability and quality of taking photos is of any concern when you are talking about using microscopes to assist with soldering.

  • @hualani6785
    @hualani6785 5 років тому +1

    Helpful, Thanks. Everyone Ive been looking at tells you in the specs how low/close you’ll possibly need to be for figuring out your needed working distance& space. for many people thats major buying criteria especially for soldering work. Yes generics are available before being branded, but gains in savings may be lost in support especially in language options, etc.

  • @tassie7325
    @tassie7325 Рік тому

    I think it is unfortunate that you criticize a microscope for not having enough space beneath it to do soldering work when the microscope was designed for viewing, not working.

  • @LoudThoughts6545
    @LoudThoughts6545 2 роки тому +1

    Hello! I have a question I don’t feel is asked too often about these particular microscopes. I’m wondering if the ADSM302 is good for looking at plants, bugs, or just things around the house that you want to see up close? I’m interested in the scope for just fun and curiosity. Thanks in advance! 😊

    • @lord_haven1114
      @lord_haven1114 Рік тому +1

      They are all decent for that purpose. You don’t need much clearance just to look at bugs or plants or coins or whatever it is. The clearance matters if you have to work on something that you’re looking at, for instance soldering something.

  • @JoniSarahDuflo
    @JoniSarahDuflo 3 роки тому

    As an Electronic Technician, I don't understand the push for Videos and Pictures in a Microscope. For homework, I only want to use the microscopes to better see what I am doing on SMD boards. Unless you are required to document the work or rework you are doing, videos and pictures mean nothing to the Electronics Technician.

    • @pcb1962
      @pcb1962 3 роки тому

      Exactly, I can't imagine why I would ever want to record what I'm doing, I just want a good clear picture for soldering.

  • @darknessblades
    @darknessblades 5 років тому +1

    for simple soldering the right most one is quite easy and nice.
    you do need a custom 3d printed base depending on how large pcb's you want to solder

  • @garnettpetrey1334
    @garnettpetrey1334 2 роки тому

    Question. The one with the added base. Where can I get that base? I just ordered it and it should be here in a few days.

  • @joesphgross562
    @joesphgross562 3 роки тому

    You usually get what you pay for 90% of the time. I am getting the 302 right after this comment. I have been working this guy so I am at 170$ that's a steal honestly. I'm going to be using it for coins and that's plenty of enough space to move coins in and out plus i like the HDMI option. Thanks brother for the awesome review and actually showing the quality for comparison. Most reviews dont show live comparison like yourself.

  • @delatronics3257
    @delatronics3257 Рік тому

    I've got the black Andonstar and it is great; you can focus at a far enough distance so you can comfortably get your soldering iron in there.

  • @saeedsobhani4213
    @saeedsobhani4213 2 роки тому

    Amazing video, thanks, now I know what to purchase.

  • @CuriousTinkering
    @CuriousTinkering 2 роки тому

    So.... solder paste is just flux and a lot of microscopic solder balls? 🤯

  • @rteaw
    @rteaw 4 роки тому

    for adsm302 you said 12megapixels. but the amazon link description say 3megapixels. ?

  • @oobeeman
    @oobeeman 3 роки тому

    All your links show unavailable items and one really shady site.

  • @casting0925
    @casting0925 4 роки тому

    Andonstar ADSM302 HD Microscope
    ----Question can you run the Microscope display and the extra display while recording?

  • @uhadonejob
    @uhadonejob 5 років тому +1

    Thanks for the review. Didn't mention if the 302 has record capability.

  • @d32b44
    @d32b44 3 роки тому

    Fantastic! I was able to cancel my order for a cheapo $36 scope and decided the ADSM302 little brother 301 is a much smarter investment for my older eyes. Thanks for the great review

  • @michaelcloud9230
    @michaelcloud9230 2 роки тому

    Thanks for the review, I'm getting into watch repair and adsm302 looks to be what would give me the room to work on the watch.
    Has anyone used it for this by the way?

  • @cybernitemusic
    @cybernitemusic 4 роки тому

    I noticed you wearing a respirator. Do you recommend any respirator for soldering fumes? I don't wanna breathe in too much bad stuff. With Covid it's harder to find one but I still would appreciate any recommendation.

  • @platinumsteel6458
    @platinumsteel6458 4 роки тому

    This is the best Andonstar ADSM302 HD Microscope review out of all the others here on UA-cam..Very Helpful..We can see working distance Picture Quality and everything in detail man..I am going to buy this for sure within a month.good job.

  • @johnthecoop8285
    @johnthecoop8285 Рік тому

    Enjoyed your review in the microscopes, thanķs

  • @bufordmaddogtannen
    @bufordmaddogtannen 2 роки тому

    The lack of range in the 2nd microscope can be alleviated by locking the screw above the diffuser, instead of above the focus ring.

  • @talclipse
    @talclipse 6 років тому

    The andonstar 201 does not output true 1080p.
    I have a 1600x800 Samsung monitor that when feed a 1080p signal from my pc will nag the hell out of you with a message about the signal not being supported,it will display 1080p just fine tho.
    With the 201 hookup up to it i do not get this message at all so i am not sure what its outputting but its not 1080p.
    Also the image is so dang grainy.i think its really 640x480 being stretched cause if i switch the output on the 201 to vga 640x480 the monitor will crop the sides but the image quality is the exact same as when in 1080p just croped.

  • @deent5186
    @deent5186 Рік тому

    Perfect video and thank you for sharing ❤😊

  • @kamalennaaji6699
    @kamalennaaji6699 5 років тому

    HOW ABOUT THE ONE WITHOUT SCREEN IF anyone tryed one please tel me your opinion about it

  • @ProtoG42
    @ProtoG42  6 років тому +3

    Andonstar ADSM302
    amzn.to/2CfmUvh
    suo.im/3KYdli
    Andonstar ADSM201
    amzn.to/2CuRjsG
    Koolerton 4.3” Microscope
    amzn.to/2Cfmo0j
    Koolerton 2.3” Microscope
    amzn.to/2CxyRQo

    • @Neslekkim
      @Neslekkim 6 років тому

      Did you compare with the ADSM301?, specs looks like ADSM302, but $100 in price difference?

  • @ImLeeAT
    @ImLeeAT 4 роки тому

    Did you managed it to connect them to a PC and use a software where you can change contrast, brightness, color and so on?

  • @sfkeepay
    @sfkeepay 4 роки тому +2

    This is not intended to be harsh, because this video is genuinely useful and sincerely appreciated. But in the spirit of trying to be helpful, here are a few suggestions. Write out a script that 1. describes the goal of the video and gives us your specific evaluation criteria 2. shows the scopes and how they compare using the framework you set for us in part 1. and 3. wraps it all up with a few concise summaries and conclusions. This video (forgive me if I sound like a dick) spends a lot of time - yours and ours - unnecessarily. It meanders back and forth, mentions this and that randomly, etc. etc. With some more prep work, it could be a high quality, professional review.
    Btw, it took me 55 minutes to compose this comment. Lots of false starts, reworked sentences, entire parts deleted, others moved from back and forth. But I wanted to be as concise and clear as I could, so I took the time. That’s basically all I’m suggesting. That said, I’m glad you made the video as it really is helpful.

  • @irmadion4904
    @irmadion4904 4 роки тому

    Very nice comparison with all important details. That´s what the people need and not bla bla bla! Thank you Sir!

  • @butar12
    @butar12 5 років тому

    sir, can g600 (1st microscope) direct connect to monitor? i have monitor vga unused. hope your feedback sir, thx

  • @AnoNymous-dh2sv
    @AnoNymous-dh2sv 5 років тому

    A new flagship phone is better than 90% of those "microscopes". Technologically they are literally no better than good phone cameras on x8.
    i.e. they should be selling phone adapter/stands too. Especially the cheaper 2-3MP cameras here are a total waste of money.

  • @DemiGod3
    @DemiGod3 5 років тому

    Which one is best suited for electronics technician work based on fact that a solder iron have to be used under it at any given time when working on SMD's circuitry?

  • @MetalheadAndNerd
    @MetalheadAndNerd 5 років тому +1

    How do you prevent the soldering fumes from setting on the lens?

  • @johnmcook1
    @johnmcook1 3 роки тому

    im looking at the TOMLOV 7" LCD Digital Microscope

  • @chuckb2175
    @chuckb2175 3 роки тому

    how do you come up with 12 Mega pixels

  • @billysgeo
    @billysgeo 5 років тому

    Wouldn’t it better to get a cheap (80-90$) stereo microscope?

  • @nezbrun872
    @nezbrun872 6 років тому +3

    Thanks for taking the time to make the video. I have a few questions.
    How do these compare to a stereo optical microscope for rework and other manual soldering?
    What is the latency like on these devices, and general speed of the UI?
    What are the optical and digital zoom capabilities like?
    The views you show are quite close in, certainly more so than I'd generally use, and I regularly go down 0.4mm pitch and 0201 passives, sometimes even 01005 size. How well would these digital microscopes work with, day, a 2" diagonal target?
    Thanks again!

    • @ProtoG42
      @ProtoG42  6 років тому +1

      The UI is very similar for all of them and works fine. The cheaper unit seems to have more latency but not too bad. I’ll take more board photos a bit farther back this weekend and post them.

    • @nezbrun872
      @nezbrun872 6 років тому +1

      OK, many thanks. I'm particularly interested about the video latency, historically this is the reason I've not had much luck with these digital microscopes: I find I need immediacy for eye-hand co-ordination tasks like placing parts and manual soldering or rework. Regarding the zoom, if I can't see a reasonable board area of, say, one or two square inches, I end up spending time hunting myself which upsets my workflow. This is where an optical zoom function, preferably a parfocal zoom helps (parfocal = where the focus is maintained as you zoom in and out).

    • @ProtoG42
      @ProtoG42  6 років тому +1

      Have you used a digital microscope with a built in display? I find the usb units I've used have had a noticeable delay. I could try with a stop watch to see if I can pick up any latency. None of these 4 microscopes will zoom out enough to see 2 inches. I measured a little over 1 inch of viewing space. The 4x digital zoom on all of these will serve the purpose of a parfocal zoom.
      Here are more photos of a 2cm wide board taken with the 4 units:
      Andonstar ADSM302 taken @ 20.5cm i.imgur.com/uzFEcRA.jpg
      Andonstar ADSM201 taken @ 12cm i.imgur.com/Zh7Pf5I.jpg
      2.5" "Koolertron" Microscope taken @ 11cm with no light i.imgur.com/cVwB9KZ.jpg
      2.5" "Koolertron" Microscope taken @ 11cm with light at lowest setting i.imgur.com/gLUf2KR.jpg
      4.3" "Koolertron" Microscope taken @ 21cm i.imgur.com/9HJ58hx.jpg

    • @nezbrun872
      @nezbrun872 6 років тому

      Those stills are pretty revealing, the ADSM302 is by far the best one, I assume you're using each devices' built in lighting?
      I've used two USB streamed ones which were both useless except for taking stills. One of those is a C-Mount that mates with the trinocular port on my optical inspection microscope, and it has a live HDMI out at 1080p60. I have it hooked up to a 15" 1080p60 HDMI monitor on the bench, and the latency of this setup is such that I find it unusable: it's perhaps only 1/15s or so but it's enough that I find it quite offputting: I can potentially be working for several hours at a time with a microscope. It is possible that the latency is in the monitor, I'll have to try it with some different combinations of cameras and monitors.
      I did look at one of your videos a week or so ago where you did some placing without the aid of a microscope. I can do this down to 0402 particularly if I know the board, but for 0201 and below and placing fine pitch devices

    • @zaprodk
      @zaprodk 6 років тому +1

      Latency on the ADSM302 is approx. 240ms.

  • @robkelley1311
    @robkelley1311 6 років тому

    Anyway you can show how you made the base to the first one? I am purchasing that camera and would like to assemble the base like yours. I just cannot see how it's all put together. I'm a better visual learner. Thanks. Make a video of it?

  • @Jin-Ro
    @Jin-Ro 4 роки тому

    Glad I found this review. You sold me on the ADSM302, looks leagues better that the stuff I've been looking at. Thanks!

  • @yolisurich4025
    @yolisurich4025 2 роки тому

    Screen resolution is important try 4k.

  • @markharrisllb
    @markharrisllb 2 роки тому

    Very interesting. I have one like the last one with an 8.5” screen. My one complaint is that minimum magnification is 50x and sometimes I’d be happier with 10x. When I first got it part of me wished I’d bought one with eyepieces over one with a screen because I struggled a bit with depth, especially when using tweezers. However, it doesn’t take much practice at all to get used to using one. I am the ultimate amateur and was previously using a jeweller’s visor, the difference even a lower end microscope is phenomenal.

  • @valerijscheller3253
    @valerijscheller3253 3 роки тому

    Hy perewodi na russkii или слабо

  • @jimmyperkins97
    @jimmyperkins97 3 роки тому

    what kind of batteries does the remote take?

  • @tonymoor3647
    @tonymoor3647 3 роки тому

    Hi there, very interesting video, thanks ! I think the 302 is ideal for my needs, but I am wondering about the field of view (max and min). I would say that the biggest thing I would ever need to take a pic of would be 20mm squared. Even that would be unusually large. 99% would be under 10mm. Would be interested to know what you estimate this thing can go up to. Many thanks !

  • @zaprodk
    @zaprodk 6 років тому

    I just received my ADSM302 and i'm not impressed by the fact that you cannot use the HDMI-output and record at the same time. What a bummer!

    • @ProtoG42
      @ProtoG42  6 років тому

      I don't use an external monitor with it so I never even thought to try that.

  • @Termnz
    @Termnz 5 років тому +1

    This review made up my mind to buy one, keep up the good reviews

  • @Synth2000
    @Synth2000 5 років тому

    Hi, are these things good for regular soldering (no SMC but regular through hole stuff etc)?
    I am starting to be pissed off at my augment lent “second hand” and thinking about trying something more professional.

  • @georgethomas9436
    @georgethomas9436 5 років тому

    Thanks for the review. I am currently looking at the AM4115ZT Dino-lite for soldering electronic components. The cost for this is $630.00 usd.

  • @electronicajean727
    @electronicajean727 2 роки тому

    cual es el mejor microscopio para reparar celulares

  • @bens3067
    @bens3067 4 роки тому

    prices have come way down . i got the G600 on ebay for $35 with free shipping!

  • @AxelWerner
    @AxelWerner 5 років тому

    Did you say that ADSM302 does have 12MP ?!? because i can only find it as 3MP on amazon, and even that is expensive as phuck! >200EUR totaly overpriced for 3mp.

    • @paulreeder5241
      @paulreeder5241 4 роки тому

      I am a Commodore 64 fan thru and thru. First computer I ever bought. Played with it for 72 hours straight.
      I had everything that you could possible get for it. I also did the reset switch, toggle switches for device number on the 5-1/4" 1541 floppy drives. Got the 1571 3-1/2" floppy drive, and datasette. Fast hackem' was my favorite disc copy program. I also later, started repairing them for people. The chips were really easy to get. People would forget to turn the computer on LAST and burn out the kernel chip. Those were the days my friend.

    • @paulreeder5241
      @paulreeder5241 4 роки тому

      Oh yeah, I forgot to mention my favorite games were all of the Olympic games like "Summer Games" 1 and 2, "Winter Games", etc. and, of course, "Impossible Mission". lol

  • @Soupie62
    @Soupie62 5 років тому

    It would be nice to see each one "in action". Zooming in on a chip is marvelous, but in practice you usually have lower magnification.
    If the microscope can't capture video [and even if it can] then videos from an adjacent camera showing smoke blowing on sensors, or a soldering iron trying to reach a joint, make for a great visual aid to go with your comments.

  • @SURGE101
    @SURGE101 6 років тому

    When using the adonstar 302 , is it sensitive and wobble when moving around on the table?? Can you solder and move around without the camera losing focus and going crazy?jay

    • @ProtoG42
      @ProtoG42  6 років тому

      There is a noticeable lag with the cheaper units. I haven't noticed any lag with the two andonstar units when placing small smd components and soldering.

  • @derarchitekt4925
    @derarchitekt4925 6 років тому

    Can I use the 302 for hotair soldering? Or will I kill it the first time it's in use? :p

  • @valmejoserosignoli8083
    @valmejoserosignoli8083 3 роки тому

    how to change hps001 language

  • @donepearce
    @donepearce 5 років тому

    I preferred this one. This one was OK, but I didn't like this one much.

    • @ProtoG42
      @ProtoG42  5 років тому

      I rarely do product comparisons so I agree that I'm not the best at it. I'd love to learn from you. I'll watch your review when you get a chance to buy several products with your own money, prepare the tests, film the video, edit the video, and upload it for free.

  • @sorinmiliescu
    @sorinmiliescu 5 років тому

    Mate, there is no camera that has the sensor exposed to fumes! All camera sensors got a lens in the front of them, so actually the lens is exposed to fumes

  • @krisea3807
    @krisea3807 2 роки тому

    So hard to demonstrate ...

  • @kristianmendoza7000
    @kristianmendoza7000 5 років тому +1

    thank you for the demo.sir

  • @sjbolton72
    @sjbolton72 5 років тому

    thanks for the review, doesn't look like much has changed in this market since you posted this. My own research point me to the 302 as the one i need for mineral examination (and having a good image stored). Would also be good for stamp and coin collectors as well as all sorts of hobbies.

  • @alfredcalleja450
    @alfredcalleja450 4 роки тому

    Thanks for your video: I am looking for a digital microscope for SMD soldering and was bewildered by the number of options out there. Your video was very helpful and I enjoyed watching it.

  • @EvertvanIngen
    @EvertvanIngen 3 роки тому

    Just don't cheap out