How high is the airspace over a residential home?
Вставка
- Опубліковано 8 вер 2024
- 🔥Get Your Biggest and Most Common Drone Certificate Questions Answered by claiming our FREE Part 107 Guide NOW! - bit.ly/3iv3CbG
Get your drone and business related questions answered: askdroneu.com/.
Please do us a huge favor, "Like" this video and "Subscribe" to our channel.
UA-cam URL for this video - • How high is the airspa... .
Subscribe to the podcast on iTunes, and leave us a 5-star review while you're there: itunes.apple.c....
Join the #1 drone training platform and community for only $47 per month. Part 107 test prep, courses, videos, webinars, expert advice, business training, and so much more. Total, unlimited access to everything for one low monthly investment, plus you can cancel at any time. Check it out: www.thedroneu.....
Follow us:
Site - thedroneu.com/
Facebook - / droneu
Instagram - / thedroneu
Twitter - / thedroneu
UA-cam - / droneu
~-~~-~~~-~~-~
Please watch: "How FAA's NPRM for Remote ID for Drones Will Hurt Hobby Pilots or RC Pilots with Jon McBride"
• How FAA's NPRM for Rem...
~-~~-~~~-~~-~
Get Your Biggest and Most Common Drone Certificate Questions Answered by Downloading this FREE Part 107 PDF - thedroneu.clic...
1:30 to skip the commercial
I would pay like $20 for a pamphlet with all the legal statutes in a little book. As a commercial pilot.
This is a 2017 video, is it still valid on 3/14/2021
oh that is the field guide? Ill check into it. Undoubtedly, I need to buy it on your website.
I fly at 120ft high to designated view point then reduce height to do what I need to do and return home same way, fail safe is also set at 120ft altitude.
The FAA regulates all airspace to the ground. Even building a house you must conform to zoning and building codes that restrict height. In one case the FAA set a altitude restriction for an office building we doing that abutted a controlled airbase. And yes our Site and Landscape plans were part of the package that needed FAA approval. It is not silly for the FAA to regulate a tree when you are near an airport..
BostonClipper
How about airspace over an Indian reservation???
@@Tonofbrickz Def. check with a lawyer on that.
A drone flew in my yard past my windows and stuff, My dogs jumped at it to try and pull it down.
So what legal ground would I stand on if my drone is shot down over someone else's property while flying above their treeline? 2nd question is what if someone starts throwing around privacy stipulations?
Assuming its like most other cases i've seen online, they will be charged with criminal mischief for negligent use of a firearm, and have to compensate you in full for the cost of the drone. Cases of it happening are a lot less common than the news would have you believe.
When I fly over other houses, I fly at about 200 feet or more.....and from there you can't make out details on a person, with the wide angle camera my drone uses, people are to small to identify...
I just bought your audiobook bud!!!!!!
So long story shortlets say u have a 100ft×100ft lot/yard, you have 80~ft above air space around general tree top lines if that makes sence, but if you whunt to fly in a horizontal direction past your 100×100ft lot/yard you half to be above the surrounding trees? I guess it's kinda like a really big mushroom shape of airspace if u think about it.
This is how google maps was able to take a picture of everyone's property in almost the entire world.
San Francisco requires a permit for UAF filming. I'd like to know how legal that is.
A...guys....take a look at Civil Code Section 1708.8 et seq. (AS AMMENDED) California has regulated drone operation over peoples property. Here you must always get permisdion from the neighbors!
Does a helicopter need permission?
Dick Fantastic the new amended law specifically addresses Drones!
How about airplanes or hot air balloons?
Dick Fantastic again...the new law is soecific to drones!
It's an invalid law per the FAA.
CA CIVIL CODE 1708.8 (a) A person is liable for physical invasion of privacy when the person knowingly enters onto the land or into the airspace above the land of another person without permission or otherwise commits a trespass in order to capture any type of visual image, sound recording, or other physical impression of the plaintiff engaging in a private, personal, or familial activity and the invasion occurs in a manner that is offensive to a reasonable person.
(b) A person is liable for constructive invasion of privacy when the person attempts to capture, in a manner that is offensive to a reasonable person, any type of visual image, sound recording, or other physical impression of the plaintiff engaging in a private, personal, or familial activity, through the use of any device, regardless of whether there is a physical trespass, if this image, sound recording, or other physical impression could not have been achieved without a trespass unless the device was used.
(c) An assault or false imprisonment committed with the intent to capture any type of visual image, sound recording, or other physical impression of the plaintiff is subject to subdivisions (d), (e), and (h).
(d) A person who commits any act described in subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is liable for up to three times the amount of any general and special damages that are proximately caused by the violation of this section. This person may also be liable for punitive damages, subject to proof according to Section 3294. If the plaintiff proves that the invasion of privacy was committed for a commercial purpose, the person shall also be subject to disgorgement to the plaintiff of any proceeds or other consideration obtained as a result of the violation of this section. A person who comes within the description of this subdivision is also subject to a civil fine of not less than five thousand dollars ($5,000) and not more than fifty thousand dollars ($50,000).
(e) A person who directs, solicits, actually induces, or actually causes another person, regardless of whether there is an employer-employee relationship, to violate any provision of subdivision (a), (b), or (c) is liable for any general, special, and consequential damages res ...
leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/codes_displayText.xhtml?lawCode=CIV&division=3.&title=&part=3.&chapter=&article=
That's cool for folks living in Cali. Obviously doesn't apply for anyone living outside of CA but cool info.
But, you can look for local laws.
Yep, and locally, the only law that applies to my area is a state law. North Dakota Century Code29-29.4-01 which just restricts drone use of law enforcement, requiring them to have a warrant to use a drone in any surveillance capacity.
jrupprechtlaw.com/drone-laws is a good place to get information on all state and federal drone laws.
Still, good to know about California.
Once my mavic is 100’ above the ground you can’t hear it and unless it’s dead silent (no wind or traffic, ) you won’t even hear it! If I lost my video feed while over 100’ I would have a really hard time spotting it in the air ! This is how some loose there drones if they have a malfunction with there phone or tablet! That’s why I only use a Apple product for flying they rarely malfunction! So most people won’t even know a drone flew over them once even at 75’ you may not see it! You can’t complain about something you don’t know is there! And at that height the camera can’t see much detail they don’t have $100000.00 Super Military zoom lenses on them.
I see you are improving your videos with you advertising your sponcer shorter but to the point they expect yet covering this good question without the "Macho" demeanor. I do give you props on doing much better in the videos. Regarding the officer wanting to come on the show, I think it would be good for the general public but really it is common sense. Many officers still are not trained fully on drone laws set by the FAA however it is coming into the judicial system for their knowledge. The reason they are not is simple, most drone operations is CIVIL and very little reflect on CRIMINAL infractions and or crimes. Every state as its own state statutes so a Chicago officer can not tell you and or enforce say New Mexico Statutes where you are or say Florida Statutes where I am. All they can advise is like how you put it, how to communicate with police in general. FAA set the regulations but each state has to combine these regulations to the law makers who set and voted successfully on the statutes for the officers to enforce . If this officer comes on your channel, comes to educate communication with officers, I find this great but if he or she starts talking statutes, I would simply advise for everyone not living in the state of this officer, to take it with a grain of salt sort of speak and inquire the state statutes from the state that person is from while putting in the FAA regulations together to know exactly the legalities that person can safely fly legally.
It's just a matter of common sense and courtesy. If you calming explain what you are doing and why, 99% of the time people will work with you. Just don't be an Alpha Hotel as we say in the amateur radio community.
I have a drone that flys over my home and hovers over my backyard and videos my children playing and can video in my bathroom and bedroom windows...so would you be comfortable to someone flying a drone and videoing your wife taking a shower?
They operator need to respect your privacy
what bathroom has a window to look in the shower... Anyways, if you are actually telling the truth, video the drone, send a report to the police and you can prolly file a restraining order. Most of the stuff with these laws is common sense stuff like don't shoot the drone, and don't harras people by filming them and hovering in their lawn
you cannot fly a drone at an airport
You can if you get atc permission.