You have the right to travel, and fair enough. You can walk, ride a bicycle, take a bus, fly in a plane. I mean, assuming you are not under some form of bail restriction, have at it re: travel. But, if you are going to operate a motor vehicle on a public roadway, you are required to have a license, insurance, and your vehicle must be registered. This was all decided by SCOTUS in 1930, with their decision upholding the decision(s) of thousands of lower courts. Noting, after reiterating the right to travel in the inaugural paragraph, the decision goes on to explicitly and repeatedly grant municipalities (later interpreted to include the individual states as well) the right to regulate automobile travel in their geographic area. This includes traffic laws, the requirement(s) for insurance/registration, and the requirement for a driver's license. That's what the law says. I trust you are not simple-minded enough to try and excerpt a sentence or two out of a 5-6 page SCOTUS decision; and then hold that sentence or two out as being the law of the land. You're not doing that, right ?
“The right of a citizen to travel upon the highway and transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and business, differs radically and obviously from that of one who makes the highway his place of business and uses it for private gain, in the running of a stage coach or omnibus. The former is the usual and ordinary right of a citizen, a common right, a right common to all, while the latter is special, unusual, and extraordinary.” Ex parte Dickey
18 U.S. Code § 31. Definitions (6) Motor vehicle.- The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo. (10) Used for commercial purposes .- The term “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit.
@@AdamSmith-cf1tl Oh, I know, Pumpkin, I know. Oh, you're right. Oh are you ever right. Tell you what, happily go out and try this pile of horse droppings on the roadway. See what happens. Say, didn't 'ol Rick wind up in prison ? -There's your answer, son.
@@AdamSmith-cf1tl Pumpkin, Ithink you are leaving out the full read of the 1930 SCOTUS case. Check it out. Then, go visit Rick in prison. Maybe take him a couple packs of KOOLS so he can bribe his cellmates into leaving his "Sacred Place" un-molested for at least one night. You'll be there soon enough yourself.
NOT "all bs". All true. Show me valid refutations of his claims. DO you then submit to tyranny? WHAT specific claims does he make that are untrue. HOW do you dispute those claims? WHAT facts to you claim the refute them? You are a BS, intellectually dishonest, ad hominem "denier" with ZERO facts to back up your assertions. SHAME on you.
Yes. We've done that for decades. It's time we all found a better method. Manage our elected servants. Interact with them. Make our views known. Hold them accountable when they transgress. All it takes is enough of us united to that purpose. Thanks for watching and voicing your thoughts. You are a great American for doing so!
WHO does not "know the law". Rick? HOW?? Do YOU know he is wrong??? HOW is he wrong?? PROVE he is wrong!!! Your words are a blanket ad hominem attack with NO proof. Piss off.
@@veganskeletons4131 meaning he's not a lawyer. He's not legally permitted to practice law anywhere. He can't even give legal advice. Then again I don't know who would take legal advice from such an idiot who lost every case he's been involved in & doesn't understand the laws. Damn I know the law better than this idiot.
He does, in fact, make that claim. I have not seen evidence that it is true. Regardless, he does know the law, and his statements about it are true to the best of my ability to verify. I like Rick, and do consider him a friend, but am not blind to his . . . quirks.
Well now! Brings a whole new meaning to “Ya can’t fight city hall” doesn’t it now? About time we the people take back this Country and hold these SERVANTS accountable to their OATH of office..hooah!
@@Userxyz-z2d SERCO, is a staffing company, they are the company contracted to hires and fill the butts in the seats. There are many companies out there that do this. Infosys, Cognizant, Conduent. These companies hire and staff for a lot of government jobs, both at the local and federal level. I’ve worked for one of the companies that maintained EBT/WIC/EDC for half the states as well as one of the SSA accounts. Depending on the type of account, only those of us hired and who had cleared an extensive background check were allowed to support or even access Federal or accounts that processed actual transactions. Violating this would cost the company it’s contract. You don’t know what your talking about.
@@veganskeletons4131 he couldn't be more wrong about the law and you're a mark for falling for this. you should know you're inept now because you fell for this absolute nonsense.
I am in WA state and am disabled. I have the police threatening me with arrest and trespass for not wearing a mask repeatedly. Today I was kicked out of the only health clinic that accepts my insurance for "refusing to wear a face mask". They called police. Whidbey island transit has signs on their buses saying face mask policy is "the law"
So your choices are: a) Get better insurance *and* find a clinic on their plan that’ll treat you without a mask b) Persuade that clinic to let you in without a mask c) Sue the clinic, despite the very low chance of success and very low payout should you win d) Keep going and getting arrested, and sue the city/county with no hope of success, or e) swallow your pride and wear a mask. I know which one I’d do.
18 U.S. Code § 31. Definitions (6) Motor vehicle.- The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo. (10) Used for commercial purposes .- The term “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit.
@@ima9173 I don't understand what you are trying to say. This is the definition of "Motor Vehicle". When did this change? Why are you so eager to approve of a corrupt system that violates our rights?
@@AdamSmith-cf1tl You know damn well that you are REQUIRED to have a valid drivers license , insurance and have the vehicle/ automobile/ truck registered to operate / drive that vehicle / automobile/ truck on any state or federally maintained road or highway in the United States. Why do you play these stupid games ?
@@ima9173 The state is misapplying (through trickery, deceit and when necessary with violence) commercial code to those outside the purview of the original statutes. A free people do not need, nor would they ever seek, permission from those who style themselves as "servants" to a.) Own Property, b.) Use and Enjoy that Property, c.) To Travel in their Automobile on the roads paid for by fuel taxes and held in trust for the People, or to d.) exercise our God given rights. Do you seriously believe that our rights come from "government"? Here's a quick thought experiment for you... O.C.G.A. 50-3-9 (2010) Abuse of federal, state, or Confederate flag unlawful It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to mutilate, deface, defile, or abuse contemptuously the flag of the United States, the flag, coat of arms, or emblem of the State of Georgia, or the flag or emblem of the Confederate States of America by any act whatever. Does this mean it is a "crime" to burn a Confederate flag in the state of Georgia? The government lies about everything. Why wouldn’t they be lying about this? "Personal liberty largely consists of the Right of locomotion -- to go where and when one pleases -- only so far restrained as the Rights of others may make it necessary for the welfare of all other citizens. The Right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but the common Right which he has under his Right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Under this Constitutional guarantee one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another's Rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct." II Am.Jur. (1st) Constitutional Law, Sect.329, p.1135 Why would the preeminent encyclopedia of American Jurisprudence say this? It is clearly not a typo. The "government" is gaslighting you.
How does a constitutional scholar end up in jail? Tricky Ricky put on that sun hat a little too late....the sun fried his brain cells.
@@Userxyz-z2d 😂😂😂😂
@@Userxyz-z2d he will sue & win???
😂😂😂😂
He probably won't. Because he'd lose...like he's lost literally every case he's been involved in.
Btw...when u are asked to prove jurisdiction the judge has to be satisfied NOT the defendant or the d.a..lmao
@@Userxyz-z2d I mean, he served his sentence and never won any kind of appeal or suit. lol
@@IdahoDingbat is it public record? How can you prove your claim.
Rick Martin is not an attorney and never will be one
Neither is Rick Martin
You twist the truth Rick
Does he?
How?
I am genuinely curious.
You have the right to travel, and fair enough. You can walk, ride a bicycle, take a bus, fly in a plane. I mean, assuming you are not under some form of bail restriction, have at it re: travel. But, if you are going to operate a motor vehicle on a public roadway, you are required to have a license, insurance, and your vehicle must be registered. This was all decided by SCOTUS in 1930, with their decision upholding the decision(s) of thousands of lower courts.
Noting, after reiterating the right to travel in the inaugural paragraph, the decision goes on to explicitly and repeatedly grant municipalities (later interpreted to include the individual states as well) the right to regulate automobile travel in their geographic area. This includes traffic laws, the requirement(s) for insurance/registration, and the requirement for a driver's license. That's what the law says. I trust you are not simple-minded enough to try and excerpt a sentence or two out of a 5-6 page SCOTUS decision; and then hold that sentence or two out as being the law of the land. You're not doing that, right ?
“The right of a citizen to travel upon the highway and transport his property thereon, in the ordinary course of life and business, differs radically and obviously from that of one who makes the highway his place of business and uses it for private gain, in the running of a stage coach or omnibus. The former is the usual and ordinary right of a citizen, a common right, a right common to all, while the latter is special, unusual, and extraordinary.”
Ex parte Dickey
18 U.S. Code § 31. Definitions
(6) Motor vehicle.- The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.
(10) Used for commercial purposes .- The term “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit.
"Operate a motor vehicle" Lol... You clearly have no idea what you're blabbering about.
@@AdamSmith-cf1tl Oh, I know, Pumpkin, I know. Oh, you're right. Oh are you ever right. Tell you what, happily go out and try this pile of horse droppings on the roadway. See what happens. Say, didn't 'ol Rick wind up in prison ? -There's your answer, son.
@@AdamSmith-cf1tl Pumpkin, Ithink you are leaving out the full read of the 1930 SCOTUS case. Check it out. Then, go visit Rick in prison. Maybe take him a couple packs of KOOLS so he can bribe his cellmates into leaving his "Sacred Place" un-molested for at least one night. You'll be there soon enough yourself.
This guy loves to hear himself talk. But, its all BS
NOT "all bs". All true.
Show me valid refutations of his claims.
DO you then submit to tyranny?
WHAT specific claims does he make that are untrue.
HOW do you dispute those claims?
WHAT facts to you claim the refute them?
You are a BS, intellectually dishonest, ad hominem "denier" with ZERO facts to back up your assertions.
SHAME on you.
@@theangrycitizen It has all already been ajudicated. Rick lost. Took it right up the ying-yang. You are outside your jurisdiction.
America has failed us here. We glorify and reward behaviors like this
Yes. We've done that for decades.
It's time we all found a better method. Manage our elected servants. Interact with them. Make our views known. Hold them accountable when they transgress. All it takes is enough of us united to that purpose.
Thanks for watching and voicing your thoughts. You are a great American for doing so!
Isn’t there a saying “Ignorance of the law is Rick Martin”?
Any one can serve? Yup. But pay closer attention to the dismissal rate. Which is 100%.
This is funny
Defacto word-salad du jour... works every time!
This is going nowhere
Vague claims with zero facts to validate.
PROVE HIM WRONG.
SHAME on you for invalidated accusations.
All lawyers must be bar certified or go to jail you been there a few times
But you don't know the law
WHO does not "know the law". Rick? HOW?? Do YOU know he is wrong??? HOW is he wrong?? PROVE he is wrong!!!
Your words are a blanket ad hominem attack with NO proof.
Piss off.
@@theangrycitizen Try Hendrick v Maryland. Try the definition of driver in Blacks Law Dictionary ( not the 2nd edition that sovcits like to quote )
Rick Martin Stolen Valor /Felon. Felon fakery lawyer
I don't know if he's guilty of stolen valor but he is a constitutional lawyer not a bar lawyer.
@@veganskeletons4131 Funny how they try to cover up the original 13th amendment up. Certain channels are trying to make a joke of it as well.
@@Someguyto they are willfully ignorant
or they are "lawyers", they are part of the system that owns them
@@veganskeletons4131 meaning he's not a lawyer.
He's not legally permitted to practice law anywhere. He can't even give legal advice. Then again I don't know who would take legal advice from such an idiot who lost every case he's been involved in & doesn't understand the laws. Damn I know the law better than this idiot.
Isn't Rick Martin the dude who claims to have had a bunch of judges thrown in jail? 🤣🤣🤣
I think that was Ronnie Lee Davis (Bear's Law) he's still in prison.
He does, in fact, make that claim.
I have not seen evidence that it is true.
Regardless, he does know the law, and his statements about it are true to the best of my ability to verify.
I like Rick, and do consider him a friend, but am not blind to his . . . quirks.
Well now! Brings a whole new meaning to “Ya can’t fight city hall” doesn’t it now? About time we the people take back this Country and hold these SERVANTS accountable to their OATH of office..hooah!
I call bs
Vague and un-validated.
Yes mandate are laws states n cities has the right to impose mandates for public safety
10 th Amendment. This idiot actually posted that an automobile is not a motor vehicle
Do you know how to get ahold of of Rick?
I think he's still in prison. Might be out by now, though. Not sure.
I can get you in touch with him. Reach out to me.
(207) 951-5689.
@@theangrycitizen Isn't that the phone number for the gay bar ?
Try the psych ward
@@ButcherBird-FW190D the psych ward
he is absolutely right!
If Bar means British Accredited Registry, why are bar licenses only a US thing?
and why does SERVCO run our US Patent Office wen its owned by Britain?
@@Userxyz-z2d SERCO, is a staffing company, they are the company contracted to hires and fill the butts in the seats. There are many companies out there that do this. Infosys, Cognizant, Conduent.
These companies hire and staff for a lot of government jobs, both at the local and federal level.
I’ve worked for one of the companies that maintained EBT/WIC/EDC for half the states as well as one of the SSA accounts.
Depending on the type of account, only those of us hired and who had cleared an extensive background check were allowed to support or even access Federal or accounts that processed actual transactions.
Violating this would cost the company it’s contract. You don’t know what your talking about.
@@Userxyz-z2d they don’t
They are not only a "U.S. thing". There is a BAR association in every country that is a colony of the Crown.
It does not !
Dude you're not a lawyer. You're a cartoon character like marcel
you need to be a lawyer to know your rights ? if you're American you should be ashamed of yourself
He's a constitutional lawyer
@@veganskeletons4131 lol he's nothing actually
he's a convicted felon.
@@veganskeletons4131 he couldn't be more wrong about the law and you're a mark for falling for this.
you should know you're inept now because you fell for this absolute nonsense.
Lady bugsy ha ha ha
I am in WA state and am disabled. I have the police threatening me with arrest and trespass for not wearing a mask repeatedly. Today I was kicked out of the only health clinic that accepts my insurance for "refusing to wear a face mask". They called police.
Whidbey island transit has signs on their buses saying face mask policy is "the law"
Paul please go to our website at www.ConstitutionalLawGroup.US and submit our "request a consultation" form.
You have a solid cause of action.
@@theangrycitizen Thank you so much!
www.TheHealthyAmerican.org
@Vier Eiken nothing has changed
So your choices are:
a) Get better insurance *and* find a clinic on their plan that’ll treat you without a mask
b) Persuade that clinic to let you in without a mask
c) Sue the clinic, despite the very low chance of success and very low payout should you win
d) Keep going and getting arrested, and sue the city/county with no hope of success, or
e) swallow your pride and wear a mask.
I know which one I’d do.
Hendrick v Maryland
18 U.S. Code § 31. Definitions
(6) Motor vehicle.- The term “motor vehicle” means every description of carriage or other contrivance propelled or drawn by mechanical power and used for commercial purposes on the highways in the transportation of passengers, passengers and property, or property or cargo.
(10) Used for commercial purposes .- The term “used for commercial purposes” means the carriage of persons or property for any fare, fee, rate, charge or other consideration, or directly or indirectly in connection with any business, or other undertaking intended for profit.
@@AdamSmith-cf1tl try that in court
@@ima9173 I don't understand what you are trying to say. This is the definition of "Motor Vehicle". When did this change? Why are you so eager to approve of a corrupt system that violates our rights?
@@AdamSmith-cf1tl You know damn well that you are REQUIRED to have a valid drivers license , insurance and have the vehicle/ automobile/ truck registered to operate / drive that vehicle / automobile/ truck on any state or federally maintained road or highway in the United States. Why do you play these stupid games ?
@@ima9173 The state is misapplying (through trickery, deceit and when necessary with violence) commercial code to those outside the purview of the original statutes. A free people do not need, nor would they ever seek, permission from those who style themselves as "servants" to a.) Own Property, b.) Use and Enjoy that Property, c.) To Travel in their Automobile on the roads paid for by fuel taxes and held in trust for the People, or to d.) exercise our God given rights.
Do you seriously believe that our rights come from "government"?
Here's a quick thought experiment for you...
O.C.G.A. 50-3-9 (2010)
Abuse of federal, state, or Confederate flag unlawful
It shall be unlawful for any person, firm, or corporation to mutilate, deface, defile, or abuse contemptuously the flag of the United States, the flag, coat of arms, or emblem of the State of Georgia, or the flag or emblem of the Confederate States of America by any act whatever.
Does this mean it is a "crime" to burn a Confederate flag in the state of Georgia?
The government lies about everything. Why wouldn’t they be lying about this?
"Personal liberty largely consists of the Right of locomotion -- to go where and when one pleases -- only so far restrained as the Rights of others may make it necessary for the welfare of all other citizens. The Right of the Citizen to travel upon the public highways and to transport his property thereon, by horse drawn carriage, wagon, or automobile, is not a mere privilege which may be permitted or prohibited at will, but the common Right which he has under his Right to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness. Under this Constitutional guarantee one may, therefore, under normal conditions, travel at his inclination along the public highways or in public places, and while conducting himself in an orderly and decent manner, neither interfering with nor disturbing another's Rights, he will be protected, not only in his person, but in his safe conduct."
II Am.Jur. (1st) Constitutional Law, Sect.329, p.1135
Why would the preeminent encyclopedia of American Jurisprudence say this? It is clearly not a typo.
The "government" is gaslighting you.