@@SuperReview I like this version of the 64Audio tuning. Pleasant, natural, engaging without being colored. Good details, good soundstage and separation. I'm A-B ing with the Andromeda's, the Elysian-Effect Gaea.
@@JeffJacquesmd how do you find they compare to the andromedas in terms of technicalities? I got a pair of andromeda 2020's not too long ago, and I'm finding them thin (which ofc is expected from them lol). However, I really like how clear the details and separation is with that pair. Interested to hear how they compare on that front. Thanks!
Can you compare U4s vs Symphonium Audio Meteor. Graphs look almost the same. Also single bore internal design. Meteor has the same driver count with beautiful sound and note thickness + excellent treble extension.
The Meteor is much more about driving midbass, so there is soo much fun with like Snarky Puppy but I wouldn't play Joni Mitchell on them. U4s can do both. The main thing about the U4s is this crazily atmospheric presentation...✌️ 😁
@@SuperReview Yeah, they've said that they tuned all their iems with those tips, and for me i find those to have the best sound to my ears with the U12t, and deeper, while not really secure fit. I use JVC spiral dots now which sit in pretty much the same spot. But ear moisture and tia driver on the nozzle kinda sus.....
Great set and awesome review. Have been looking for a good upgrade from my tin t3 plus.. really confused between olina se, Galileo, hexa and some other models.. looking for good seperation, improvement in details while not loosing the great soundstage of the t3+ ... Can you recommend some balanced iem's around the 100 dollar price range that meet my requirements:) TIA
Just compared this to the Aful Performer 5 with a 15ohm impedance adapter measurement on your squig link and they graph very very similar... interesting, I will be trying it out once my Performer 5 arrives. Great review, too expensive for me though for just 4 drivers. My most expensive one right now is Variations. I don't know how much upgrade that would be to the U4s... I think I would rather save up and go full on flagship even if it is $2k or more...
Price doesn't necessarily correlate to quality, $2k doesn't mean it's going to be better. The Variations is already competing with these kilobuck and multi-kilobuck sets IMO, it's more a matter of preferences and tradeoffs moving up from the Variations. It's already one of the best IEMs you can get, and more expensive stuff may be better at one or other thing but likewise Variations may be better at others. The tuning on this is quite different from the Variations, it has a load more mid-bass, and less upper mids. So it's going to sound quite different, but not unequivocally "better".
Anything above $600-$700 you are paying for a specific sound, not always accurate sound reproduction, all these 1.5k+ IEMs are a no go for me personally due to this exact reason. With that money you can build a pretty nice home theater audio setup.
You miss the point. Equatiing drivers to.sound quality is an error. The real question is what sounds better? How does it sound better? Be precise. Tell us what music, what soundstage, what instrument separation. Describe what you are hearing. Otherwise its like equating horsepower to performance.
I also find the Kiwiears Orchestra lite has very similarly shaped upper mids (just a higher level) plus the highs look pretty similar too. The bass shelf on the orchestra lite is more like the stock P5, but EQing either to sound more like the 64audio (with or without the adapter) isn't that hard and the results are pretty great. The only additional tweak I did was remove the 3k dip, to make the mids more like Studio4. I'm sure there are technical differences, the U4S has a DD for one but on a pure resolution level they shouldn't be extremely far off. So if this IEM looks interesting but you can't afford over $1k then Orchestra like could be a great alternative along with P5.
I've always been interested in the 64 Audio gear. Had my eye on a used Trio for a while, but the price, even on the used market is so far above the 500-600ish price tag I've set for myself. The MEST MK2 is what I have contemplated if I wanted to go above said price point. How would these compare to the MEST for someone who likes punchy bass? 🤔
They have different strengths. Been a while since I heard MEST, but from memory it has more accentuated imaging, but a slightly artificial sound. U4s has a stronger sense of body behind its bass.
I’d love to know how this compares with the Symphonium Meteor? I was just about to buy the Meteor and saw this had just been released so now I’m holding off. I know they compete in different price brackets but I wonder if they sound pretty close factoring in diminishing returns etc?
@@SuperReview thanks! I heard that the gaea's were pretty versatile but kinda intense so I wasn't sure if they would be good for longer listening sessions.
I don't really like the U4s treble response which is too bright and peaky for my ear. I don't have a chance to demo the Supernova. Does Supernova treble response similar to U4s?
does this appear to be as technical capable as stuff like mest II? 1.1k price is not too bad but there are quite a few excellent sets with used price lower or around this point
When you said the imaging is so so, for that price, I lost all interest really, though I do like a brighter tune. I mean, so so for the price or just so so in general?
How do those multi BA sets conpare to this Tribrid set？Have you listened to these other sets? What music did you play, with what source? Some multi BA set, at whatever price point, needs to be tuned perfectly to out execute this excellently tuned set. Be precise.
@@JeffJacquesmd I completely missed that the U4s contains a DD. Still a tough sell, though. My modest IEM collection includes the all-BA Moondrop S8, the Thieaudio Monarch tribrid, the DD Sennheiser IE600, and the Tangzu Ze Tian Wu Heyday planar. All of these come in at less than $800, and, with the possible exception of the Heyday, I don’t think I would trade any of them for the U4s based strictly on reviews and technical specs (I haven’t heard the U4s). My source is an Astell & Kern SE180 with all of the available dac modules (ES9038PRO, AK4497EQ x 2,, ES9038Q2M x 4, AK4493SEQ x 2). I listen primarily to metal and rock.
Paring the U4S with a pure silver cable it´s the perfect synergy for vocals 👌 M15 module pure silver cable , it pushes the mids a bit forward and helps in separation and imaging
So i was right. After 2 weeks with the u4s, i finally sold them. They are nowhere near the Monarchs 2. These are on a completely different level. The Monarchs play in the u12t league, with just different tuning where the u4s are just fun, basshead iems but definitely less detailed and sophisticated. The u4s also sound less natural and realistic. Great for 600-900 bucks but they dont compete with top dogs.
@@SuperReviewThat's true, not being able to resell or lend to another person is a big point against going custom. On the other hand, the ideal fit from the custom would solve the issue of finding a tip that provides good support to the IEM.
@@resottolamontagna904 Yeah, just ignore all their propriatary technology like APEX, TIA, LID and excellent tuning and build quality. I have the U12t and it is well worth the price. Go back to your chifi that will end up failing in a few months time.
A fool and his $ are soon parted. If the target is great sound then put that money toward a nice 2.1 system and if you don’t have the room get a nice pair of open-backed headphones and a dac… so easy to do this well for under $500.
Hey, fine if you don't see the value in spending this amount on an IEM, I suggest not describing people who do as fools. Most people not in the audio hobby think it's silly to spend more than $30 on earphones. Not everyone has the same values and means.
@@SuperReview I am an audiophile and love the sound hobby. I also love your reviews. However there is not enough tech or development costs to warrant any iem costing more than $150. I am always on the hunt for great sound and it needs to have real value and if possible stand the test of time. Quality speakers, amps, preamps and even over-ear headphones can often last a “lifetime” and be passed on to others. Maybe I am just a different kind of audio hobbyist. I apologize if my use of an old albeit harsh yet succinct phrase offended anyone.
@@gordon2875 well , lol ... I own a solid variety of stuff , and honestly from a production standpoint , in my opinion , there is no materials in that product to make it worth that much money. You see the celebrities that endorse them? Look there first.
I just autoeqd my s12pro to this in the squig and it seems to be a very similar freq response, just having 2k to 10k a little toned down, which it can get pretty spicy on the s12 after a while...
@@SuperReview Hi, I mean, thanks to you and others we have this very large data base. Just go in there in search for an IEM with similar frequency response. The Truthear Hola is very close, as well as the Tangzu Wan'er. Also the a bit more expensive Kato is quite similar, offering a phantastic accessories package of great cable and nice box, besides the extremely beautiful shell and high comfort.
@@luistohe Exactly, even if you do not find any other cheaper stock IEM, use EQ, and besides some small resonances that might prevent it from working perfectly, your get very close to any frequency response. Why buy more IEMs, especially expensive ones?
The Monarch Mk2 is still better. Considering the u12t better than this, while the Monarchs are still very slightly better than the u12t, you can do the math yourself:)
I've listened to u12t and mmk2 and I much prefer u12t for sound and comfort tbh Edit: blorg's reply is a bit more sensible than mine, u12t just aligns with my preference more. To my ears and brain, it wowed me more with its imaging and technicalities than the mmk2 which just sounded like a more detailed version of my thieaudio legacy 3s
I think he went over the differences quite well, Monarch Mk2 is leaner, this is fuller. So there's preference there as to which you prefer, I like the MMk2 personally and would probably pick it if I had to pick only one but many find that style tuning quite lean. One the best things about MRS's reviews that he can explain these differences beyond/despite personal tonal preference.
There is not a single decent IEM of 64 audio, many have high level of distortion and strange frequency response, not talking about their absurdly high prices, but there is a sucker born every day and many gullible people with money.
@@SuperReview for overpriced IEMs that do nothing special. I assume you did not pay for it, but most of your audience will. And you make a living by shilling them. I did not say that you are not enjoying them, as much as you could a model for $20-50 with an almost identical frequency response.
Mystery cable reveal, and U4s vs. Helios, MEST mk2 in the audience Q&A 👉 ua-cam.com/video/v5IDe8Vcwl0/v-deo.html
Thanks for the review. I enjoy your content, and the channel in general. These are way too expensive for me but it is good to find out about them....
i already ordered mine a few days ago! really excited
Nice, what pushed you over the edge?
So did I Chris.
Wearing them as I listen to this vid.
Really, very, very good
i enjoying mine too! i cant get any tips to work except foam tips, with the foam tips the u4s is engaging and impactful.
Good to see you're rocking the hola cable, my audiophile friends are disappointed in me for using $20 zonie cable with U4S
The more and more I’ve been hearing about this after the stream, the more I’m leaning towards making it my next (and last?) iem
I said last iem everytime i got my next iem, and that’s happened 3 times and probably counting😂
@@beeguy300 lol
Ever since buying my Dunu SA6 last year, I’ve been pretty content (I really wanted to try this but it’s out of my iem budget)
@@Ben-ic1veHey long time ago but did u ever upgrade? In the exact same boat as you currently hahah.. wondering if it’s worth it
@@lewpeg no :)
Couldn’t stomach the cost
Would you mind compare U4S to IE 600? I daily drive the IE 600 and wondering how these 2 fare against each other. Thanks
I’m hoping to get the chance to try this, it looks like I might get a loaner unit. It looks so dope!
Seems up your alley 👍
Listening to this on the U4S a day after the stream。
Thoughts?
@@SuperReview I like this version of the 64Audio tuning. Pleasant, natural, engaging without being colored. Good details, good soundstage and separation. I'm A-B ing with the Andromeda's, the Elysian-Effect Gaea.
@@JeffJacquesmd how do you find they compare to the andromedas in terms of technicalities? I got a pair of andromeda 2020's not too long ago, and I'm finding them thin (which ofc is expected from them lol). However, I really like how clear the details and separation is with that pair. Interested to hear how they compare on that front. Thanks!
I wish collaborators would try to bring more supernova style tuning to the market. The Monarch MK2 tuning seems to be the default now in days
Which aspect of the Supernova tuning specifically?
@@SuperReview the midbass glide and the more subtle ear gain
I want to check out the new M12 modules with my U12T.
Same
Yeah, I'm surprised they aren't selling them separately, especially given they ship separately.
@@SuperReview Me, too - I looked as soon as I commented here 😐
Damn you got three hola cables? I myself brought two hola’s just for the awesome cable.
These things are gold.
Itsbso cool.their filters. Instead of placing dumpers behind the dd drivers. The dumper it's on the full chamber .
Can you compare U4s vs Symphonium Audio Meteor. Graphs look almost the same. Also single bore internal design. Meteor has the same driver count with beautiful sound and note thickness + excellent treble extension.
They are similar. I'd say Meteor has even less defined instrument separation and the bass is more dominant and less bouncy.
The Meteor is much more about driving midbass, so there is soo much fun with like Snarky Puppy but I wouldn't play Joni Mitchell on them. U4s can do both. The main thing about the U4s is this crazily atmospheric presentation...✌️ 😁
7:45 That's why the stock tips are short, so that they are flush with the nozzle and you can push that sucker in. But fit is very subjective.
Nozzle almost shoots past the end of the stock non-Spinfit tips 😅
@@SuperReview Yeah, they've said that they tuned all their iems with those tips, and for me i find those to have the best sound to my ears with the U12t, and deeper, while not really secure fit. I use JVC spiral dots now which sit in pretty much the same spot. But ear moisture and tia driver on the nozzle kinda sus.....
Deeper, meaning a good seal, is critical for these. Spinfits or Final Es seem to do the trick😊
@@JeffJacquesmd Well you can get a good seal in different insertion depths, but the sound is going to be different
@@Alepap. where did they say that? Sadly these tips don't work for me, spinfit 145 or the foam tips are great though.
Now I wonder if they'll make a universal version of my beloved A3T, best BA bass I've heard, but it's the only kilobuck set I've heard
very nice comparison part. 👌
Where is your Mest Mk2 review? I saw on your squiggling that you rated it a 5/5 but I can’t find your review.
No review, only heard it on demo a couple of times.
What cable do you have there? nice video bro
Truthear Hola cable 🙊
Great set and awesome review. Have been looking for a good upgrade from my tin t3 plus.. really confused between olina se, Galileo, hexa and some other models.. looking for good seperation, improvement in details while not loosing the great soundstage of the t3+ ... Can you recommend some balanced iem's around the 100 dollar price range that meet my requirements:)
TIA
You might consider simgot ea500 or new simgot e6ml too
Just compared this to the Aful Performer 5 with a 15ohm impedance adapter measurement on your squig link and they graph very very similar... interesting, I will be trying it out once my Performer 5 arrives.
Great review, too expensive for me though for just 4 drivers.
My most expensive one right now is Variations. I don't know how much upgrade that would be to the U4s...
I think I would rather save up and go full on flagship even if it is $2k or more...
Price doesn't necessarily correlate to quality, $2k doesn't mean it's going to be better. The Variations is already competing with these kilobuck and multi-kilobuck sets IMO, it's more a matter of preferences and tradeoffs moving up from the Variations. It's already one of the best IEMs you can get, and more expensive stuff may be better at one or other thing but likewise Variations may be better at others. The tuning on this is quite different from the Variations, it has a load more mid-bass, and less upper mids. So it's going to sound quite different, but not unequivocally "better".
Anything above $600-$700 you are paying for a specific sound, not always accurate sound reproduction, all these 1.5k+ IEMs are a no go for me personally due to this exact reason. With that money you can build a pretty nice home theater audio setup.
You miss the point. Equatiing drivers to.sound quality is an error.
The real question is what sounds better? How does it sound better?
Be precise. Tell us what music, what soundstage, what instrument separation. Describe what you are hearing.
Otherwise its like equating horsepower to performance.
I also find the Kiwiears Orchestra lite has very similarly shaped upper mids (just a higher level) plus the highs look pretty similar too. The bass shelf on the orchestra lite is more like the stock P5, but EQing either to sound more like the 64audio (with or without the adapter) isn't that hard and the results are pretty great. The only additional tweak I did was remove the 3k dip, to make the mids more like Studio4. I'm sure there are technical differences, the U4S has a DD for one but on a pure resolution level they shouldn't be extremely far off. So if this IEM looks interesting but you can't afford over $1k then Orchestra like could be a great alternative along with P5.
Hi Mark, are you using the stock eartips for the supernova?
No, using Spinfit W1s at the moment I believe.
Scoured the comments but did not see discussion on comparison to the 2022 yearphone, ie600?
I've always been interested in the 64 Audio gear. Had my eye on a used Trio for a while, but the price, even on the used market is so far above the 500-600ish price tag I've set for myself. The MEST MK2 is what I have contemplated if I wanted to go above said price point. How would these compare to the MEST for someone who likes punchy bass? 🤔
They have different strengths. Been a while since I heard MEST, but from memory it has more accentuated imaging, but a slightly artificial sound. U4s has a stronger sense of body behind its bass.
I’d love to know how this compares with the Symphonium Meteor? I was just about to buy the Meteor and saw this had just been released so now I’m holding off. I know they compete in different price brackets but I wonder if they sound pretty close factoring in diminishing returns etc?
ive heard both, the meteor is very smooth but has extremely good bass and treble. u4s is more intense imo but at the same time more impactful.
Yeah they are similar. I think U4s is better overall, but Meteor has a more unique charm to it. More physicality behind U4s.
@@SuperReview "unique charm" means what exactly ?
Does more drivers iem worth to buy and does it sounds better?
its like cores in pc processors
Damn dude how many hola's you bought for the cables xD
I'm not done 😅
lol no
I wish they would include ipx connectors on their universal fit iems
How come?
@@SuperReview I got ipx cables on my 64 A3E customs and fell in love with them
Hello, what rating would you give the Olina SE? 😊
Not sure, I've been told the copy I have isn't representative so don't think I've heard it.
Would you recommend these or the elysian gaea for a versatile daily driver?
They are quite opposites, but I think the U4s is easier to live with. Gaea is pretty intense to daily.
@@SuperReview thanks! I heard that the gaea's were pretty versatile but kinda intense so I wasn't sure if they would be good for longer listening sessions.
@@gjorGaea is really nice I’d suggest getting. before they sell out.
I don't really like the U4s treble response which is too bright and peaky for my ear. I don't have a chance to demo the Supernova. Does Supernova treble response similar to U4s?
squig.link/?share=Super_22_Target,64_Audio_U4s_(m20),7th_Acoustics_Supernova
Supernova is much smoother. Smoothest iem I have ever heard.
Thank you. I will pre order the supernova.
Where did you get those ear tips?
Softears Ultra Clears
Is this better than a bomb burrito?
Honestly, no IEM is.
Chipotle brings satisfaction no audio wave ever can
Better then listening to my wife
yes
I must be getting old, I read burrito bomb instead the first time.
does this appear to be as technical capable as stuff like mest II? 1.1k price is not too bad but there are quite a few excellent sets with used price lower or around this point
He compares in the Q&A (link in the pinned comment, skip to 21:57), says MEST has better imaging but this is more natural.
@@blorg8206 didn't see. big thanks.
When you said the imaging is so so, for that price, I lost all interest really, though I do like a brighter tune.
I mean, so so for the price or just so so in general?
Imaging is not its strength, something like the recently-reviewed Softears Studio4 is a wild contrast.
The U4s seems to be a tough sell for 64 Audio. There are a number of great multiBA sets out there at less than $1,000.
How do those multi BA sets conpare to this Tribrid set？Have you listened to these other sets? What music did you play, with what source?
Some multi BA set, at whatever price point, needs to be tuned perfectly to out execute this excellently tuned set.
Be precise.
@@JeffJacquesmd hybrid, not a tribrid. Tia is also BA.
@@JeffJacquesmd I completely missed that the U4s contains a DD. Still a tough sell, though. My modest IEM collection includes the all-BA Moondrop S8, the Thieaudio Monarch tribrid, the DD Sennheiser IE600, and the Tangzu Ze Tian Wu Heyday planar. All of these come in at less than $800, and, with the possible exception of the Heyday, I don’t think I would trade any of them for the U4s based strictly on reviews and technical specs (I haven’t heard the U4s). My source is an Astell & Kern SE180 with all of the available dac modules (ES9038PRO, AK4497EQ x 2,, ES9038Q2M x 4, AK4493SEQ x 2). I listen primarily to metal and rock.
Yeh, I think these USA companies are being eaten alive from the ground up.
@@maegnificant yes I’m aware, but I thought it being tubeless meant it was considered a different type of driver.
Thanks
Paring the U4S with a pure silver cable it´s the perfect synergy for vocals 👌 M15 module pure silver cable , it pushes the mids a bit forward and helps in separation and imaging
Nice cable btw 😅
Over here tryin to sell most of my stuff for an ie 600. Still searching for an iem equivalent of t60 argons
I haven't heard Argons so not sure which does that job better.
xenns top review ?
Does this have ANC? Thank you!
No, wired IEMs like this rarely have ANC. They block out sound passively.
So i was right. After 2 weeks with the u4s, i finally sold them. They are nowhere near the Monarchs 2. These are on a completely different level. The Monarchs play in the u12t league, with just different tuning where the u4s are just fun, basshead iems but definitely less detailed and sophisticated. The u4s also sound less natural and realistic. Great for 600-900 bucks but they dont compete with top dogs.
been listening to some limpbizkit here w a12t can say it doesnt miss that much in bass area
What does the last alphabet of the model name mean? This is 's' but other models are 't'.
Wish I could tell you.
I just noticed Super Review keep saying honestly today. Should I assume Super Review is not honest mostly?
Yep, sadly. (I also heard myself saying that a lot which is a sign I should've prepared better for the stream.)
52:42 budget segment? 🤐
Waw, Monarch Mk2 is lean, may come a little bit thin and bodiless. And the depth is on the average side. Looks like I have very different ears.
vs. U4s, definitely
@@SuperReview So you put these one vs another not both vs fidelity
what tips is he using here?
He has Softears Ultra Clears on.
Is the u6t better than the u4s
I haven't heard them back to back, but I remember liking U6t a lot.
‘Yo Adrian’
And I haven't even seen Rocky.
if you got 2500$ to spend on 1 IEM which one you will buy?
Supernova
Variations and the rest for cocaine and hookers
plase try kz pr1 pro they sound good
I couldn't listen to them for very long, too bright.
@@SuperReview you change the tip?
wifh the orginal tip i have very little fettiging and very little edgines
Why would anyone spend $1000+ dollars on this IEM instead of getting the custom fit A4S for the same price?
Personally I'm not interested in customs, why would I get a custom? Pain in the butt process + no one else can use it.
@@SuperReviewThat's true, not being able to resell or lend to another person is a big point against going custom. On the other hand, the ideal fit from the custom would solve the issue of finding a tip that provides good support to the IEM.
I love 64 audio but their prices are stupid
I agree totally. 1dd + 3ba for 1100 dollars...
@@resottolamontagna904 Yeah, just ignore all their propriatary technology like APEX, TIA, LID and excellent tuning and build quality. I have the U12t and it is well worth the price.
Go back to your chifi that will end up failing in a few months time.
A fool and his $ are soon parted. If the target is great sound then put that money toward a nice 2.1 system and if you don’t have the room get a nice pair of open-backed headphones and a dac… so easy to do this well for under $500.
Hey, fine if you don't see the value in spending this amount on an IEM, I suggest not describing people who do as fools. Most people not in the audio hobby think it's silly to spend more than $30 on earphones. Not everyone has the same values and means.
@@SuperReview I am an audiophile and love the sound hobby. I also love your reviews. However there is not enough tech or development costs to warrant any iem costing more than $150. I am always on the hunt for great sound and it needs to have real value and if possible stand the test of time. Quality speakers, amps, preamps and even over-ear headphones can often last a “lifetime” and be passed on to others. Maybe I am just a different kind of audio hobbyist. I apologize if my use of an old albeit harsh yet succinct phrase offended anyone.
Just 1100 usd.entry level.just ridiculous 😂😂😂👎👎👎👎
Maybe they sounds good and that's the most important thing to consider in a iem BUT .....they look like crap...
WAT
i absolutely refuse to be scammed out of 2 grand for a iem . There is no sound worth that much period. All HYPE
Im sorry, but your ears just can’t tell different. But it’s good, stick with more budget options is always good 😊
You're in luck! This is down from $2,000 to only $1,099. Almost half off! For a limited time only, grab it while you can...
@@gordon2875 well , lol ... I own a solid variety of stuff , and honestly from a production standpoint , in my opinion , there is no materials in that product to make it worth that much money. You see the celebrities that endorse them? Look there first.
@@blorg8206 What do you mean?The retail price itself is 1099
Scammed? Weird sense of the world.
Even if this may be the "cheapest" offering of 64 audio, why pay such an amount of money if you get the same frequency response for 20-100 US$?
What's the $20 IEM that sounds like this?
I just autoeqd my s12pro to this in the squig and it seems to be a very similar freq response, just having 2k to 10k a little toned down, which it can get pretty spicy on the s12 after a while...
@@SuperReview Hi, I mean, thanks to you and others we have this very large data base. Just go in there in search for an IEM with similar frequency response. The Truthear Hola is very close, as well as the Tangzu Wan'er. Also the a bit more expensive Kato is quite similar, offering a phantastic accessories package of great cable and nice box, besides the extremely beautiful shell and high comfort.
@@susokraut3169 dude, just because they look the same on a frequency graph doesn't mean they all sound the same...
@@luistohe Exactly, even if you do not find any other cheaper stock IEM, use EQ, and besides some small resonances that might prevent it from working perfectly, your get very close to any frequency response. Why buy more IEMs, especially expensive ones?
Yeah right, you never like anything
The Monarch Mk2 is still better. Considering the u12t better than this, while the Monarchs are still very slightly better than the u12t, you can do the math yourself:)
who said monarch mk2 is better than u12t
Is that like MMA math?
I've listened to u12t and mmk2 and I much prefer u12t for sound and comfort tbh
Edit: blorg's reply is a bit more sensible than mine, u12t just aligns with my preference more. To my ears and brain, it wowed me more with its imaging and technicalities than the mmk2 which just sounded like a more detailed version of my thieaudio legacy 3s
@@icarusix8750 same ive heard both and the mmk2 was disappointing while the u12t is shockingly good
I think he went over the differences quite well, Monarch Mk2 is leaner, this is fuller. So there's preference there as to which you prefer, I like the MMk2 personally and would probably pick it if I had to pick only one but many find that style tuning quite lean. One the best things about MRS's reviews that he can explain these differences beyond/despite personal tonal preference.
Dunu vulkan are 300 bucks with 6 drivers. Dont waist your money
If you just want 6 drivers, you can spend even less. Dunno what that has to do with the U4s.
There is not a single decent IEM of 64 audio, many have high level of distortion and strange frequency response, not talking about their absurdly high prices, but there is a sucker born every day and many gullible people with money.
Oh so I don't genuinely enjoy it, I'm just a sucker? For what exactly?
@@SuperReview for overpriced IEMs that do nothing special. I assume you did not pay for it, but most of your audience will. And you make a living by shilling them. I did not say that you are not enjoying them, as much as you could a model for $20-50 with an almost identical frequency response.
@@susokraut3169 Any other inaccurate predictions you'd like to add to that?
@@SuperReview I am not making predictions, let alone inaccurate ones, but stating obvious facts.
🫳🐰