КОМЕНТАРІ •

  • @LoffysDomain
    @LoffysDomain 7 місяців тому +2

    Nice! Now I can design my own 10 mm - 1200 mm 1.4f lightweight zoom lens

  • @CandyHam
    @CandyHam Рік тому +1

    Incredible, glad this exists

    • @Alex-hi2ej
      @Alex-hi2ej 4 місяці тому

      😂❤❤❤❤😂😂😂😂😂

  • @Basement_crusader
    @Basement_crusader Рік тому

    Does this support assemblies that have fiber optics? Can this handle several fiber optics on one assembly?
    Do you have a material library of optical materials?

    • @quadoa
      @quadoa Рік тому +1

      Quadoa can model fiber coupling efficiency, but not fiber propagation. Quadoa has an optical material library integrated.

  • @marzchart591
    @marzchart591 Рік тому +1

    Too bad there's no synchronised time dilation trichromatic anastigmat separation generator. Would buy it if it did.

    • @Larken42
      @Larken42 Рік тому +1

      I know, there’s not even a workable solution to eliminate sinusoidal deplaneration

  • @JanPBtest
    @JanPBtest Рік тому

    Windows only, good grief. Do you implement Buchdahl aberrations (mono- and chromatic)?

    • @quadoa
      @quadoa Рік тому +2

      Quadoa is running on linux as well

    • @JanPBtest
      @JanPBtest Рік тому +1

      @@quadoa Thanks, that's great! I'll try your demo version soon, looks like I need to upgrade my Linux box 🙂 The reason I asked about Buchdahl is that I wrote a program that calculates all of his aberration coefficients in full generality (any order, aspherics included, chromatic aberration coefficients, in any coordinates ("any" means "generalised paracanonical" in his terminology)). And I started playing with it and it's a rather interesting bag. High order aberration coefficients, like order 15 (Buchdahl would call it "order 7" as "n" for him means "order 2n+1" in modern terminology) can get very large, esp. with larger curvatures, a pattern already visible in his papers in which he calculates order 9 and 11 spherical aberration coefficients. But here is an interesting thing I ran across last week: I took a Zemax-optimised lens from the web and compared it to a Ludwig-Bertele-designed lens from US Pat. US3154628A (Example 4). Both are reasonably complex, 17 and 19 surfaces, respectively. Surprise: Bertele's design seems much better as far as the coefficients go. Even normalising for the larger surface curvatures, the difference in the coefficients is clear. I don't know what to think except being very impressed how Ludwig Bertele could do it with just logarithmic tables! And why Zemax wouldn't optimise better? Anyway, I thought this was interesting, sorry to talk your ear off.

  • @borsalinho
    @borsalinho Рік тому +1

    hot sh***te

  • @fffmpeg
    @fffmpeg 8 місяців тому

    do you support distortion optimization when working with anamorphic lenses

    • @quadoa
      @quadoa 7 місяців тому

      Yes, this is possible. If you need any help with setting up the merit-function please contact the Quadoa support.

  • @user-du9wx3pm2l
    @user-du9wx3pm2l 9 місяців тому

    Do you organize training to students? can it be downloaded with your permission?

    • @quadoa
      @quadoa 9 місяців тому

      There are organized Quadoa training seminars e.g. in Jena, Germany optonet-jena.de/events/master-optical-design/?lang=en . Quadoa offers free student licenses within the Quadoa Student Program. You can apply for a free student license here: www.quadoa.com/license-education