He's intentionally trying to mislead you.... the facts are laid out... Trump is guilty.... The transcript has been released and this guy has it or ignorant... RODECAST and other attorneys have it... broke it down.... The thing is... Each count is 4 yrs in prison... Even if he gets half knocked off during appeals, he will still do the max time of 20 yrs. In Ny, its 4 per but max 20 yrs. This guy is intentionally trying to sew questionable doubt... and the fact is ... THERE'S NO DOUBT. Notice he tossed out Cohen was a liar? Yes, Cohen is... but he lied for TRUMP.. he was a major trumper... as was Lev Parnas... But, trump threw them under the bus. As he will do to his bodyguard. Its not an accounting error.. He made a deal... And repaid Cohen.... after he took a 2nd mortgage on his home to help trump. This was why he was being repaid.... But....the second trump decided to screw him, Cohen came clean... It doesn't matter if Cohen lied ever now... the documents show reality... All Cohen was in this case was supporting the facts.... that were documented and signed by .... TRUMP .. On top... he paid Cohen over the amount reimbursement but taxes and more... .. This guy in the video knows this... he's playing ignorant for the Trumpicans. ... Again..... Cohen and Stormy weren't the strengths in the case.... DOCUMENTS were... And Defense called Pecker to help trump...it hurt him more. He admitted a catch and kill scheme, paid for previous stories but trump didn't reimburse him. So, in the emergency situation, Cohen stepped up after the Orange turd said, he'd make it worth his time if he helped him... Which the docs support that... .. Defense only called 1 witness that screwed him more. .. Note... every juror was approved by BOTH Defense and Prosecution... Infact... atleast 2 on the case were Trumpicans...but after the case.... unanimously voted to convict. ... This guy is paid for by the Republican superpac to intentionally mislead.... He claims to be democrat, donates a few hundred yrly but earns millions from them... Pure BSer.. 2 faced... Facts are facts.... the evidence show that.... He knew they were about to endict him so he intentionally pushed up his run for election to claim election interference... But.... If you watch his interview on FOX..... He literally admitted that fact.... Saying it wasn't election interference.... Wait.. WHAT?????? Watch it..... don't trust everything anyone says ... listen to his words.... He literally states he knew they were about to indict...... Jack smith was only called in for certain advisory services... do his thing... but didn't realize they had a few judges bought and paid for... Vs following the rule of law, doing what judges like in Russia do.... Here... its crooked crp and delay delay delay.... Trump will loose.... and will run to Russia.... .. Its up to the judge... could put him on a strict probation since he running for prez. 1st he has to do the probation/parole officer stuff... before July 11.. if it isnt done ..the judge will take matters into his own hands.... Trump has to provide medical, family history etc back to birth.. including mental evaluations ... To make sure he can handle any sort of incarceration... if needed. Shoot... the judge can force him into a mental hospital with his security to be evaluated. This could take 30 days... no outside contact. Midas touch is mostly a Dem channel but they have a lot of Republicans on,... and most are Legal scholars or lawyers... Defense, and Prosecution. .. If you want some legit legal advice without the word salad .. i have tge channels saved.. Also... there's some with Drs and such on that break down trump and bidens mental health.... Lucid vs not but clinical terms... 1 day a woman blacked out at his rally... he seemed to be genuinely caring... asked if they needed something... they said WATER.... He tells his crew, the second he was given water to give to the woman... he suddenly decided to drink it... basically not saying a word but saying FK YOU....im going to drink it... not ever caring or... his brain just forgot... like Alzeimers or ?? This is why he repeats and such .. but screws up not remembering the added lies. .. But, this guy is a schmuck as my grandpa would call him.. Yes, my GP was Lithuanian Jew... he'd call this putz much worse... Lol.. i grew up in a catholic home... but loved him to death. Oh.. he married 2 catholic wives. They chose what to believe... I'm in the middle... but... I'm hearing GP speak his mind in my head with his accent. Lol.. ..
I want to pop in and let the good Professor know that I love his Jewish neshoma, he’s an absolute blessing to everyone who stand for social justice, equality and the rule of law 🖖
What kind of dumb and destructive policy is it to never represent the same client more than once? Countering the weaponization of the courts should be a more important policy.
Mr. Dershowitz: Is Trump having difficulty retaining the best lawyers because the good lawyers are fearful of Government persecution (e.g., IRS audit etc.)?
I am 80 years old and I still operate a business. In the course of running the same business for 61 years, I have had to litigate many matters. And I have always gotten a settlement in my favor. I always tell people, "When you need a lawyer or a doctor, you need to hire the best". I was disappointed in Trump's team. I almost got the feeling that because they thought there was no crime, they could at least get a hung jury. I'm not sure that the best lawyers in our country could have managed to get even a hung jury. But we will never know. A better defense would have certainly helped in the appeal. Up until the start of the trial, I guess I was also so naive to think something like this whole thing could happen in the United States. I am a native of Texas and still live in the town where I was born. I have seen real crazy things happen in Justice Court, but never anything like this in a court of record. I live only 20 miles from the LBJ ranch and I knew LBJ personally. He and my father were good friends. I would have voted for him, but the election was on November 3, 1964 and I turned 21 on November 4. Everyone around called LBJ a crook and he did some things that were in the gray area. But I don't think he would have ever condoned the weaponizing of our legal system. Again, I hope Trump has better representation during the appeals.
Professor Dershowitz, I found a very informative video that you might be interested in seeing, it’s a confession in Arabic with English subtitles “Palestinian politician admits the Palestinians are originally from Egypt and Saudi Arabia live on tv”.
Dershowitz's argument that no one knows if Trump was at the Jan 2017 meeting between Cohen and Weisselberg where they negotiated Cohen's upcoming 2017 compensation is weak. Because there is no way that Cohen would accept Weisselberg having a voice in his compensation without Trump's knowledge and consent. Why would he? Cohen was no longer working for the Trump Org in 2017. And Trump was his client, not Weisselberg. Consider this circumstantial evidence: No one disputes that Cohen stopped representing the Trump Organization starting in 2017 and only represented Trump personally in 2017. No one disputes that Weisselberg worked for Trump and took orders from Trump and NOT Cohen. No one disputes that Cohen worked for Trump and took orders from Trump and NOT Weisselberg. No one disputes that Weisselberg and Cohen would have NO reason to negotiate with each other about Cohen's compensation as Trump's personal attorney UNLESS Trump told them to do it No one disputes that Weisselberg wrote down the payment plan for Cohen on Cohen's bank statement. No one disputes that the written payment plan was followed to the letter and Cohen submitted 12 monthly invoices to Trump for $35,000 each. No one disputes that Trump personally paid 9 of these invoices himself and never raised an objection or question about them. No one disputes that as an attorney, Cohen knows that any attorney-client agreement would have to be approved by the client themself (Trump). And an outsider like Weisselberg would have no authority to commit Trump to an attorney-client agreement. CONCLUSION--Both Weisselberg and Cohen would have required Trump to sign off on Cohen's compensation plan. They would NOT have hidden it from Trump. Cohen had a legal obligation to get Trump's approval. And Weisselberg would NOT jeopardize his job by intervening in the private business between Trump and Cohen
Couldn’t the jury also infer that the prosecution suborned perjury from Michael Cohen by excusing Weisselberg from testifying at this trial through his previous plea deal. In any event, you’re absolutely correct, Alvin Bragg pulled some incredibly shady things BEFORE this case ever went to trial.
Another good clip. But I would strongly suggest that Mr. Dershowitz print out Allen Weisselberg's name in large letters and have it taped below his camera/computer screen when taping since he has such a problem remembering it.
I respect AD but there are some concerns - first, focusing on Monday morning evaluations with hindsight is much easier than foresight; second, trying to frame this case in a rational legal environment is akin to Alice in Wonderland - no matter what the defense said or how they said it, would have made no difference - period; and third, I respect that you would not vote for Trump but you have not ruled out voting for Biden - given what Biden has done with lawfar at a minimum should make anyone unwilling to vote for Biden even though unwilling to vote for Trump. I respectfully suggest you cease trashing Trump’s defense lawyers - as one who has offered forensic economic testimony for almost five decades with much time spent in courts (though not as extensive as you or from a lawyer’s perspective), Monday morning analysis is far easier than being there as the game is being played. I think yours constant referring to Trump not have good attorneys is approaching pettiness.
Stop Alan.... why on earth would the Judge make a statement about witnesses that were not called... that may be a statement for the defense attorney....but certainly not from the Judge....
There were a million reasons the jury could have acquitted, and one reason to convict. And we see what the jurors chose.
Either his lawyer's are incompetent or secretly they're against him too. You need to break your code and defend him
More what? More lies?
The judge certainly wasn't going to allow effective closing arguments from the defense.
Yeah the lawyers aren’t very good.
Who?
@@robzombieshot Todd Blanche
let's stop analyzing this like it is a legitimate legal case. It was 100% a complete and utter sham.
You're Nick, it wasn't a legitimate trial.
They could have had a high jury. The defense was trash
He's intentionally trying to mislead you.... the facts are laid out...
Trump is guilty....
The transcript has been released and this guy has it or ignorant...
RODECAST and other attorneys have it... broke it down....
The thing is...
Each count is 4 yrs in prison...
Even if he gets half knocked off during appeals, he will still do the max time of 20 yrs.
In Ny, its 4 per but max 20 yrs.
This guy is intentionally trying to sew questionable doubt... and the fact is ... THERE'S NO DOUBT.
Notice he tossed out Cohen was a liar?
Yes, Cohen is... but he lied for TRUMP.. he was a major trumper... as was Lev Parnas...
But, trump threw them under the bus. As he will do to his bodyguard.
Its not an accounting error..
He made a deal...
And repaid Cohen.... after he took a 2nd mortgage on his home to help trump. This was why he was being repaid....
But....the second trump decided to screw him, Cohen came clean...
It doesn't matter if Cohen lied ever now... the documents show reality...
All Cohen was in this case was supporting the facts.... that were documented and signed by ....
TRUMP
..
On top... he paid Cohen over the amount reimbursement but taxes and more...
..
This guy in the video knows this... he's playing ignorant for the Trumpicans.
...
Again..... Cohen and Stormy weren't the strengths in the case.... DOCUMENTS were...
And
Defense called Pecker to help trump...it hurt him more.
He admitted a catch and kill scheme, paid for previous stories but trump didn't reimburse him. So, in the emergency situation, Cohen stepped up after the Orange turd said, he'd make it worth his time if he helped him...
Which the docs support that...
..
Defense only called 1 witness that screwed him more.
..
Note... every juror was approved by BOTH Defense and Prosecution...
Infact... atleast 2 on the case were Trumpicans...but after the case.... unanimously voted to convict.
...
This guy is paid for by the Republican superpac to intentionally mislead....
He claims to be democrat, donates a few hundred yrly but earns millions from them...
Pure BSer.. 2 faced...
Facts are facts.... the evidence show that....
He knew they were about to endict him so he intentionally pushed up his run for election to claim election interference...
But....
If you watch his interview on FOX.....
He literally admitted that fact....
Saying it wasn't election interference....
Wait.. WHAT??????
Watch it..... don't trust everything anyone says ... listen to his words....
He literally states he knew they were about to indict......
Jack smith was only called in for certain advisory services... do his thing... but didn't realize they had a few judges bought and paid for...
Vs following the rule of law, doing what judges like in Russia do....
Here... its crooked crp and delay delay delay....
Trump will loose.... and will run to Russia....
..
Its up to the judge... could put him on a strict probation since he running for prez.
1st he has to do the probation/parole officer stuff... before July 11.. if it isnt done ..the judge will take matters into his own hands....
Trump has to provide medical, family history etc back to birth.. including mental evaluations ...
To make sure he can handle any sort of incarceration... if needed.
Shoot... the judge can force him into a mental hospital with his security to be evaluated. This could take 30 days... no outside contact.
Midas touch is mostly a Dem channel but they have a lot of Republicans on,... and most are Legal scholars or lawyers... Defense, and Prosecution.
..
If you want some legit legal advice without the word salad .. i have tge channels saved..
Also... there's some with Drs and such on that break down trump and bidens mental health....
Lucid vs not but clinical terms...
1 day a woman blacked out at his rally... he seemed to be genuinely caring... asked if they needed something... they said WATER....
He tells his crew, the second he was given water to give to the woman... he suddenly decided to drink it... basically not saying a word but saying FK YOU....im going to drink it... not ever caring or... his brain just forgot... like Alzeimers or ??
This is why he repeats and such .. but screws up not remembering the added lies.
..
But, this guy is a schmuck as my grandpa would call him..
Yes, my GP was Lithuanian Jew... he'd call this putz much worse...
Lol.. i grew up in a catholic home... but loved him to death. Oh.. he married 2 catholic wives. They chose what to believe...
I'm in the middle... but... I'm hearing GP speak his mind in my head with his accent. Lol..
..
It would not have mattered. Trump could have had Clarence Darrow making his closing arguments and they still would have found him guilty.
Absolutely!
Trump better move his headquarters to a Red State. He can do as much Dirt as he wants and would never be charged let alone convicted....
@@benojenkins7981 people like you are not going to believe their eyes come november.
They scoured the New York law books to find something, anything!, with which to charge Donald Trump.
PROF. A DERSHOWITZ...SPOT ON, LET THE PEOPLE LEARN THE TRUTH.....
if the decision was pre-ordained, what difference does any Closing Argument make??
Trump needs a shark lawyer. His lead attorney comes off as a genteel gardener (Chauncy in Being There). Calling Roy Cohn!
Professor, you should volunteer for his appeal .
He should but wont He talks but he hasnt the true calibre
I want to pop in and let the good Professor know that I love his Jewish neshoma, he’s an absolute blessing to everyone who stand for social justice, equality and the rule of law 🖖
What kind of dumb and destructive policy is it to never represent the same client more than once? Countering the weaponization of the courts should be a more important policy.
Its because he is all talk and bluster and knows he hasntthe horsepower to win with Trump. His arguments are weak and at best hopeful.
I believe the defence was hampered by the judge on the missing witness and other areas as well.
Get off the fence Dersh, you see what is going. Do the right thing and support Trump and defend him
I doubt it would have made much difference. That court was hell bent on a guilty verdict, no matter what!
Mr. Dershowitz: Is Trump having difficulty retaining the best lawyers because the good lawyers are fearful of Government persecution (e.g., IRS audit etc.)?
If they are fearful they are not good lawyers IMO
I am 80 years old and I still operate a business. In the course of running the same business for 61 years, I have had to litigate many matters. And I have always gotten a settlement in my favor. I always tell people, "When you need a lawyer or a doctor, you need to hire the best". I was disappointed in Trump's team. I almost got the feeling that because they thought there was no crime, they could at least get a hung jury. I'm not sure that the best lawyers in our country could have managed to get even a hung jury. But we will never know. A better defense would have certainly helped in the appeal. Up until the start of the trial, I guess I was also so naive to think something like this whole thing could happen in the United States. I am a native of Texas and still live in the town where I was born. I have seen real crazy things happen in Justice Court, but never anything like this in a court of record. I live only 20 miles from the LBJ ranch and I knew LBJ personally. He and my father were good friends. I would have voted for him, but the election was on November 3, 1964 and I turned 21 on November 4. Everyone around called LBJ a crook and he did some things that were in the gray area. But I don't think he would have ever condoned the weaponizing of our legal system. Again, I hope Trump has better representation during the appeals.
Why didn't Trumps attorney have that witness. I heard judge didn't allow it, is thar true.
Weaselberg 🐿
Did the Trump team drop the ball in this case! So much missing.
Professor Dershowitz, I found a very informative video that you might be interested in seeing, it’s a confession in Arabic with English subtitles “Palestinian politician admits the Palestinians are originally from Egypt and Saudi Arabia live on tv”.
3rd, 3 June 2024
Dershowitz's argument that no one knows if Trump was at the Jan 2017 meeting between Cohen
and Weisselberg where they negotiated Cohen's upcoming 2017 compensation is weak. Because
there is no way that Cohen would accept Weisselberg having a voice in his compensation without
Trump's knowledge and consent. Why would he? Cohen was no longer working for the Trump Org
in 2017. And Trump was his client, not Weisselberg.
Consider this circumstantial evidence:
No one disputes that Cohen stopped representing the Trump Organization starting in 2017 and only
represented Trump personally in 2017.
No one disputes that Weisselberg worked for Trump and took orders from Trump and NOT Cohen.
No one disputes that Cohen worked for Trump and took orders from Trump and NOT Weisselberg.
No one disputes that Weisselberg and Cohen would have NO reason to negotiate with each other
about Cohen's compensation as Trump's personal attorney UNLESS Trump told them to do it
No one disputes that Weisselberg wrote down the payment plan for Cohen on Cohen's bank statement.
No one disputes that the written payment plan was followed to the letter and Cohen submitted
12 monthly invoices to Trump for $35,000 each.
No one disputes that Trump personally paid 9 of these invoices himself and never raised an objection
or question about them.
No one disputes that as an attorney, Cohen knows that any attorney-client agreement would have to be
approved by the client themself (Trump). And an outsider like Weisselberg would have no authority to
commit Trump to an attorney-client agreement.
CONCLUSION--Both Weisselberg and Cohen would have required Trump to sign off on Cohen's
compensation plan. They would NOT have hidden it from Trump. Cohen had a legal obligation
to get Trump's approval. And Weisselberg would NOT jeopardize his job by intervening in the
private business between Trump and Cohen
Couldn’t the jury also infer that the prosecution suborned perjury from Michael Cohen by excusing Weisselberg from testifying at this trial through his previous plea deal. In any event, you’re absolutely correct, Alvin Bragg pulled some incredibly shady things BEFORE this case ever went to trial.
Keep donating 💵 and voting 🗳️ DJT🇺🇸🎉
Another good clip.
But I would strongly suggest that Mr. Dershowitz print out Allen Weisselberg's name in large letters and have it taped below his camera/computer screen when taping since he has such a problem remembering it.
"Weasel" Berg.
I respect AD but there are some concerns - first, focusing on Monday morning evaluations with hindsight is much easier than foresight; second, trying to frame this case in a rational legal environment is akin to Alice in Wonderland - no matter what the defense said or how they said it, would have made no difference - period; and third, I respect that you would not vote for Trump but you have not ruled out voting for Biden - given what Biden has done with lawfar at a minimum should make anyone unwilling to vote for Biden even though unwilling to vote for Trump. I respectfully suggest you cease trashing Trump’s defense lawyers - as one who has offered forensic economic testimony for almost five decades with much time spent in courts (though not as extensive as you or from a lawyer’s perspective), Monday morning analysis is far easier than being there as the game is being played. I think yours constant referring to Trump not have good attorneys is approaching pettiness.
Vote maga 100%.
I do not feel that anything that was said would have changed the outcome. They would find him guilty no matter what was given as a defense response.
How can you still vote for Biden is beyond me...
Stop Alan.... why on earth would the Judge make a statement about witnesses that were not called... that may be a statement for the defense attorney....but certainly not from the Judge....
Allen why won't you take Trump as a client Are you afraid of your business will be ruined
Why cant you say Weisenburg's name.
You always, in every vid, trip over saying his name.
🙄