ovo je skoro koda slušam onog našeg specijalca za hibridno ratovanje - tok riječi nadire , ali smisao izmiče. I šta je tu zaključak nakon 2 sata ? Da li je ekologizam novi opijum za narod ili obrnuto, da li je premalo ili previše radikalan, da li je prepolitiziran, premalo politiziran ? Jebite me ako znam.
www.scientificamerican.com/article/earth-stopped-getting-greener-20-years-ago/ The declines challenge an argument often presented by skeptics of mainstream climate science to downplay the consequences of global warming: the idea that plants will grow faster with larger amounts of carbon dioxide. The argument hinges on the idea that food supplies will increase. It’s largely a red herring, as climate scientists have patiently explained for years. Rising CO2 does benefit plants, at least up to a point, but it’s just one factor. Plants are also affected by many other symptoms of climate change, including rising temperatures, changing weather patterns, shifts in water availability and so on.
love this guy
more people need to hear his perspective
brilliant. his critique not only applies to the discourse of the climate change...
Read his article about climate populism from last year. One of the best things I’ve ever read
dobar mi je ovaj lik.
The science says overshoot. Nevermind what politics say. Nature bats last.
ovo je skoro koda slušam onog našeg specijalca za hibridno ratovanje - tok riječi nadire , ali smisao izmiče. I šta je tu zaključak nakon 2 sata ? Da li je ekologizam novi opijum za narod ili obrnuto, da li je premalo ili previše radikalan, da li je prepolitiziran, premalo politiziran ? Jebite me ako znam.
This is so good!! Thank you.
6CO2 + 6H2O + light energy = C6H12O6 + 6O2
(Carbon Dioxide)+(Sunlight)=(Carbohydrates)+(Oxygen)
Carbon Dioxide is plant food
www.scientificamerican.com/article/earth-stopped-getting-greener-20-years-ago/
The declines challenge an argument often presented by skeptics of mainstream climate science to downplay the consequences of global warming: the idea that plants will grow faster with larger amounts of carbon dioxide. The argument hinges on the idea that food supplies will increase. It’s largely a red herring, as climate scientists have patiently explained for years. Rising CO2 does benefit plants, at least up to a point, but it’s just one factor. Plants are also affected by many other symptoms of climate change, including rising temperatures, changing weather patterns, shifts in water availability and so on.