For all those budding engineers out there, the water mitigates the risk of acoustic damage to sensitive instruments by attenuating the noise. Fascinating video. Thanks for sharing.
After the Rocket clears the Tower and is accelerating at full power, the 'sound pressure waves' of the different Rocket engine types blend together into a very unique sound. Even if you are 5 miles away, the sound is enormous. As Rocket gains altitude, there is no sound suppression system and you hear it full volume. Even when the Rocket is 25 miles up, you can still hear the engines.
Right?! I was at one of their concerts here in Houston in 2008 at the Toyota center. Lars was mentioning how they hadn't been to Houston in a really long time and that we wouldn't be disappointed. To this day, that was the loudest concert that stadium has had. Toyota center placed a decibel limit for all future concerts after Metallica performed because towards the end, it started raining nuts, bolts, and screws on the crowd and stage from all of the rigging above! I remember headbanging along and a bolt about the size of my pinky hit me in the back of the head. I thought someone behind me hit me until I started seeing people covering their heads with their hands. I believe this is why Metallica prefers to have outdoor performances or at least a bigger venue. You could say they made it rain metal.
I'm not sure how loud Metallica got when i was at one of their concerts here in Houston in 2008 at the Toyota center, but Lars was mentioning how they hadn't been to Houston in a really long time and that we wouldn't be disappointed. To this day, that was the loudest concert that stadium has had. Toyota center placed a decibel limit for all future concerts after Metallica performed because towards the end, it started raining nuts, bolts, and screws on the crowd and stage from all of the rigging above! I remember headbanging along and a bolt about the size of my pinky hit me in the back of the head. I thought someone behind me hit me until started seeing people covering their heads with their hands. believe this is why Metallica prefers to have outdoor performances or at least a bigger venue. You could say they made it rain metal.
Saw Metallica in 19 and 92. Like yours, it was the loudest show I have ever heard. The first three songs were impossible to understand, my ears could not adjust.
@@blazingguyop yes, true, but it's two different levels of exposure. Then how much cost savings you have by using salt water? And how much over dimensioning you have to put? Is it cost effective? Intelligent to do? I don't think so. You never start a trip with already a bad leg
For anyone mad that the water is wasted, I would like to remind people about the phenomenon known as the water cycle it is impossible to waste water, this water will eventually evaporate and fall back as rain thus refilling the water table this is how it has worked for billions of years and will continue for a lot more. (If we stop climate change, if not the water cycle will get dusrupted due to the increased frequency of droughts) we are using the same water that the first lifeforms on Earth used. The only reason your taught to not use too much water is so you don't use water faster than the reservoirs can fill up. This is why (in the U.S) during a drought they advise against using too much water and avoid using water to wash your car as the lack of rain means that the reservoirs can dry up the water isn't gone by any means once the drought ends the reservoirs will fill up again.
It does through a solid body of water, but a crucial aspect of these water deluge systems is that they produce billions of small water droplets which all absorb and redirect the energy. The spiral nozzles and direction and strength of each stream of water is designed to maximise the creation of droplets rather than just engulf the whole area with a solid wall of water.
The ultimate proof that Rocket launches needs to be re-evaluated. Just imagine 1 5 0 747 planes taking off at the same time using full power. This is the equivalent of one large Rocket going to space. Imagine what kind of Space Plane we could build. It could bring 10 times more resources to space and cost 100 times less than today's expenses. Looking forward to improved Space aeronautics for future generations.
Without extra information on the units, this is an amplitude graph. If the Y axis is in decibels it's an amplitude graph, if its in units of distance it's a velocity graph. Wave velocity changes depending on amplitude, frequency and phase position, with peak velocity occurring at zero crossings. Since the speed of sound is constant, both amplitude and frequency are required to calculate wave velocity. Wave velocity is inherently proportional to amplitude and frequency (∆Ydecibels/∆Xseconds = Velocity/second).
@@you2tooyou2too So looking at it again, I can put it more simply. Its not one of the other - both amplitude and velocity are two values shown on the same chart. Amplitude is the Y axis, and velocity is derived from the properties of the chart. Amplitude is the maximum and minimum value at the peaks and troughs. Velocity is represented by the slope at any given point. The velocity is the rate of change from peak to trough represents the particle velocity, its how rapidly the displacement occurs (or rather the energy behind it, because its also not frequency). With a square wave the change is instant, and the particle velocity is very high as the wave instantly changes 'polarity' for lack of a better word. Sure, the velocity is also changing in a sine pattern, but its a derived property from the graph we're looking at - its not wrong theyre two different properties and sine waves exist in all sorts of different systems.
by electronic device do you mean the ones in the rocket I'm sure there are also protection for those maybe there's a layer of protection that can dissolve vibrations .u mention sound waves travel more faster in fluid,what happen to the sound waves that travel in water when it got evaporated and as we know water can flow in a direction given it's shape Don't you think they also meant in a way if sound waves travel more faster in a fluid that air then they could use the water as a medium n give the direction where the sound waves would go and not damage the electronic ?
This whole video is doing a disservice to those who watch. You left out the water source and the launch locations and the abundance of fresh and salt water in the area where the launchs happen. Many of the rocket facilities are in the south where there is plenty of fresh and ocean water to dump into these platforms, so no people its not your drinking water getting wasted. It's not your farmland water getting evaporated. Chill
Why is this so USA limited? The Soviet developed R7 family of spacecraft do not seem to need water, except for protecting the concrete beneath the burners. Also the Chinese. Everything the USA does seems crude.
@@ImapatriotUSA ... Technically you are of course correct ... but you miss the point entirely (and not all rockers use the same fuels BTW). The video is about water emitting sound suppression systems built into the launch pad ... NOT the contents of the rocket engines exhaust (which does nothing to suppress sound) ... these are two (2) completely different things. Because of this the title of the video is incorrect.
It said MOST of the steam involved is from the condensing rocket exhaust (which is almost all steam). Some is from the deluge water boiled off by the heat of that exhaust. They did not explain, but I suspect the damage that is prevented, is from the acoustic energy that would otherwise reflect back up into the launch vehicle. The deluge must be turbulent, to disrupt & absorb that acoustic energy before it gets reflected. If (as suggested above) the wasted downward directed energies (kinetic & acoustic) were directed into some kind of storage system with low impedance, perhaps it would serve both to abate reflected acoustic damage, and salvage some of that wasted energy. Whether that is a practical idea, requires some technical and economic calculations.
You missed a third source of water. The liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen become water as they are combined in the combustion process to launch the rocket. Come on now!
You shouldn't burn in the subtitles, so large. Remember, some eccentric lunatics, like me, still watch videos on a proper screen rather than a mobile phone. Mobile first is great, in theory, but the world has forgotten that not all web browsing is done on a mobile device.
So, a year later, my friends in Phoenix, with their swimming pools, still have water coming out of their faucets. And I'm sure you've heard about the massive snowpack melting off and raising the lakes out there? Bunch of nervous nellies 🙄
They should take that extra takeoff power and have it turn a Tesla turbine to generate his/ Elon's battery Banks. Waste not. Or the energy could be stored in massive flywheels. It's easier to keep a mass moving, once it's moving. One only has to build on it from there....
It would be interesting to see how effective a 'waste energy' recapture system could be. Perhaps a huge 'windmill' or turbine below the launch vehicle (rather than or in addition to the deluge system, could drive a compressor or (yes) kinetic storage device for other purposes.
Not at all, the water isn't wasted, this is Florida, all you have to do is dig a small hole and within minutes you have a pond. It's brackish swamp/sea water that sits in the huge ponds at the launch complex, and after getting pumped to the pad it drains right back into those ponds. The "environmental impact" of the deluge system is zero.
Is the water really used (implying consumption) or merely moved from one location to another? I would think with the exception of humans and whatever water they have onboard, the amount of water on earth doesn’t change. Also, I highly doubt that water tower has anything to do with this.
It is used to absorb the acustic energy. Then whatever remains liquid flows back into the body of water it came from. If anything, there is a net gain of water due to the hydrogen and oxygen being burned into h2o. Uless that hydrogen and oxygen was created by seperating water in the first place. The water tower is for storage and to increase the water pressure
@@jasonswiatkowski9127 I think, maybe, you missed the point of my question and doubt. I understand what they’re doing and why they’re doing it. The water is utilized as a cooling and sound dampening medium, but it’s not lost or consumed. My point is more about how it’s misleading in that, although they’re “using” large volumes of water, none of it is lost.
It would be smart to just keep recycling the water that doesn't evaporate off. Other wise yes the water on earth is the same BUT the ratio of fresh drinking water vs salty ocean water is decreasing. So basically we are running out of drinking water.
@@prind142 1. I'm saying in general when we say that we are "running out of water" it's implies fresh water. Because the total water on Earth doesn't change much. 2. I really don't think they are using salty water around these Billion dollar rockets. Why would they ever risk the corrosion and getting the pipes calcified? After all, space X recycles their rockets and salty water would corrode them faster than normal. So overall, dumb idea to use sea water for this type of situation.
Half a million? Is that all? The Oil drilling related Fracking Service companies use 24X's that much on a directional oil well. EACH!! Yeap, taking 12million gals of usable water and turning it too waste!
⚙ Want to know more about the latest tech and innovations? Don’t Miss Out!
*SUBSCRIBE & HIT THE BELL* 👉bit.ly/SubscribeNowIE
"Stay hydrated" taken to a next level
You mean higher level?
I had no idea about the possibility of damage from sound waves. Cool.
Do the experiment with wine glass in home :) just have to find resonance frequency
@@Keschoo You're right, but I never connected the two, until now.
And that is the reason why spaceX wants to launch starship on the ocean.
Next time someone's mowing a lawn, listen closely, 1 inch close, your ears will hurt, but not because they blades will cut you
Because you missed physics class. 🤣
3:20 Those 1,7 million liters of water is way more than 1000 people would spend in a six days.
One of my passions for science is how it makes the simplicity of some things seem so great.
I would say that science reveals the actual greatness of seemingly ordinary and apparently "simple" things ;)
For all those budding engineers out there, the water mitigates the risk of acoustic damage to sensitive instruments by attenuating the noise. Fascinating video. Thanks for sharing.
After the first shuttle launch, the entire concrete pad had to be redone.
I live in Australia water is gold here I pay 250$ for 18 thousand litres of water.this video made my cry.
Collect those tears and desalinate them.
You realize this is in Florida right where the ocean is feet away and fresh water pours outta the sky almost daily and where nasa is located
@@GM6.7 okay well that's a win for NASA
@@iwillnotcomply2002 so how that water is used has literally zero impact on the water situation in Australia...
@@Ender240sxS13 yeah I know we're sounded in the stuff.
After the Rocket clears the Tower and is accelerating at full power, the 'sound pressure waves' of the different Rocket engine types blend together into a very unique sound. Even if you are 5 miles away, the sound is enormous. As Rocket gains altitude, there is no sound suppression system and you hear it full volume. Even when the Rocket is 25 miles up, you can still hear the engines.
Love how they used MetallicA!
Right?! I was at one of their concerts here in Houston in 2008 at the Toyota center. Lars was mentioning how they hadn't been to Houston in a really long time and that we wouldn't be disappointed. To this day, that was the loudest concert that stadium has had. Toyota center placed a decibel limit for all future concerts after Metallica performed because towards the end, it started raining nuts, bolts, and screws on the crowd and stage from all of the rigging above! I remember headbanging along and a bolt about the size of my pinky hit me in the back of the head. I thought someone behind me hit me until I started seeing people covering their heads with their hands. I believe this is why Metallica prefers to have outdoor performances or at least a bigger venue. You could say they made it rain metal.
I'm not sure how loud Metallica got when i was at one of their concerts here in Houston in 2008 at the Toyota center, but Lars was mentioning how they hadn't been to Houston in a really long time and that we wouldn't be disappointed. To this day, that was the loudest concert that stadium has had. Toyota center placed a decibel limit for all future concerts after Metallica performed because towards the end, it started raining nuts, bolts, and screws on the crowd and stage from all of the rigging above! I remember headbanging along and a bolt about the size of my pinky hit me in the back of the head. I thought someone behind me hit me until started seeing people covering their heads with their hands. believe this is why Metallica prefers to have outdoor performances or at least a bigger venue. You could say they made it rain metal.
Saw Metallica in 19 and 92. Like yours, it was the loudest show I have ever heard. The first three songs were impossible to understand, my ears could not adjust.
Questions:- IS THAT DRINKABLE OR SALTY WATER??
Neither.
Both but mainly fresh water. Saline would cause a lot of problems and other gasses would be created.
@@adrianbass5560 thanks sir...☺️
Pussyjuice
Cool thing is... evaporated water returns to earth in the form of rain... And fills the reservoirs used for drinking water.
It's not wasted.
Very interesting and informative.
I have a question how 1:20 much cold is water when it use on the rocket ?
What Irony. 0.41 is Russian rockets. They dont use water to dampen the sound vibration from rocket
This Video : they need gallons of water to launch rocket
Fast 9 : hold ma NOS
Do they use sea water or the fresh water?
If it's fresh water then I think it's not that good
Why use sea water around metals and concrete 🤔
@@andreabuzzolan9807 that's true but the launch base is always near sea
@@blazingguyop yes, true, but it's two different levels of exposure. Then how much cost savings you have by using salt water? And how much over dimensioning you have to put? Is it cost effective? Intelligent to do? I don't think so. You never start a trip with already a bad leg
@@andreabuzzolan9807 but even if it near to the sea it can easily get affected from sea water
So either way they have to maintain it
It's not like water has a one time use. The water is staying in the atmosphere and will one day come out of your tap.
For anyone mad that the water is wasted, I would like to remind people about the phenomenon known as the water cycle it is impossible to waste water, this water will eventually evaporate and fall back as rain thus refilling the water table this is how it has worked for billions of years and will continue for a lot more. (If we stop climate change, if not the water cycle will get dusrupted due to the increased frequency of droughts) we are using the same water that the first lifeforms on Earth used. The only reason your taught to not use too much water is so you don't use water faster than the reservoirs can fill up. This is why (in the U.S) during a drought they advise against using too much water and avoid using water to wash your car as the lack of rain means that the reservoirs can dry up the water isn't gone by any means once the drought ends the reservoirs will fill up again.
Wait till they start lunches from under water in the ocean !
Submarines have been capable of exactly that for decades.
Doesn't sound travel faster through water? I have so many questions!!
It does through a solid body of water, but a crucial aspect of these water deluge systems is that they produce billions of small water droplets which all absorb and redirect the energy. The spiral nozzles and direction and strength of each stream of water is designed to maximise the creation of droplets rather than just engulf the whole area with a solid wall of water.
Can i use this clip for my UA-cam Videos I'll give you Credit?
There is a thing called Water cycle dont you know?
Good info.
Can they not reuse of course not all of it but at least some of it by collecting it again after the launch?
The ultimate proof that Rocket launches needs to be re-evaluated.
Just imagine 1 5 0 747 planes taking off at the same time using full power.
This is the equivalent of one large Rocket going to space.
Imagine what kind of Space Plane we could build. It could bring 10 times more resources to space and cost 100 times less than today's expenses.
Looking forward to improved Space aeronautics for future generations.
Look up SpinLaunch.
any idea why they can't just put a huge basin of water below the rocket?
Because it would promptly blow right out
Instead of leaving a ROCK FLOATING IN SPACE in search of... know what, never mind.
i thought the excuse for using that much water would be it is salt water lol
I only bother about one thing-is it sea water or fresh water?
if thgey used salt water , would salt be left on launchpad ??
To all the water wasted commenters... It comes back as rain..... Water doesn't burn up forever lol
Most burning (including this) produces water!
1:55 that's not amplitude it's wave velocity
Without extra information on the units, this is an amplitude graph. If the Y axis is in decibels it's an amplitude graph, if its in units of distance it's a velocity graph.
Wave velocity changes depending on amplitude, frequency and phase position, with peak velocity occurring at zero crossings.
Since the speed of sound is constant, both amplitude and frequency are required to calculate wave velocity. Wave velocity is inherently proportional to amplitude and frequency (∆Ydecibels/∆Xseconds = Velocity/second).
@@yongewok Way to confused to refute. Amplitude is particle displacement. Wave velocity depends on density, not amplitude. ...
@@you2tooyou2too
So looking at it again, I can put it more simply. Its not one of the other - both amplitude and velocity are two values shown on the same chart. Amplitude is the Y axis, and velocity is derived from the properties of the chart.
Amplitude is the maximum and minimum value at the peaks and troughs. Velocity is represented by the slope at any given point.
The velocity is the rate of change from peak to trough represents the particle velocity, its how rapidly the displacement occurs (or rather the energy behind it, because its also not frequency). With a square wave the change is instant, and the particle velocity is very high as the wave instantly changes 'polarity' for lack of a better word.
Sure, the velocity is also changing in a sine pattern, but its a derived property from the graph we're looking at - its not wrong theyre two different properties and sine waves exist in all sorts of different systems.
We need to find another way for this , because it takes much more amount of water ! and we must need to save water
It's Florida... It's literally brackish swamp/sea water from ponds around the launch complex, and it drains right back into those ponds.
Your telling me Arrowhead got as loud as a rocket launch... Damn
But sound waves travel more faster(1481m/s in fluid) in fluid than in air(343 m/s) then how can they prevent from damage electronic device
You should work for NASA
by electronic device do you mean the ones in the rocket I'm sure there are also protection for those maybe there's a layer of protection that can dissolve vibrations .u mention sound waves travel more faster in fluid,what happen to the sound waves that travel in water when it got evaporated and as we know water can flow in a direction given it's shape Don't you think they also meant in a way if sound waves travel more faster in a fluid that air then they could use the water as a medium n give the direction where the sound waves would go and not damage the electronic ?
@@scarlet0017 can you explain more,or provide reference link, if any
@@ganeshjadhav-ls9zy sorry nvm what i mentioned before i only speak out my mind I'm not an expert who is still in high school
@@scarlet0017 Hey...it's ok you explain well. Don't say sorry😊
That’s why they should use TR-3B engines
Simple. Rockets are thirsty. Water you thinking?
Wait SLS has "the most powerful booster ever built"? I dont think so...
Which one is then? Saturn 5 was SLS. Did it specify which SLS it was referring to?
@@perryrush6563 Saturn 5 and SLS are two different launch vehicles. Also the Saturn 5 did not have a booster, just the main F1 engines.
Nice to know what they use our water for
This whole video is doing a disservice to those who watch. You left out the water source and the launch locations and the abundance of fresh and salt water in the area where the launchs happen. Many of the rocket facilities are in the south where there is plenty of fresh and ocean water to dump into these platforms, so no people its not your drinking water getting wasted. It's not your farmland water getting evaporated. Chill
Yes, It could have been better edited.
40 million people are worried about their water supply drying up, and then there is this. I love it.
Where are these 40 million people? California?
@@gregpeterman1102 Arizona, Nevada, California
@@gregpeterman1102 Cape Canaveral is basically in the Atlantic Ocean. It's not going to effect the water supply in Western states.
@@MelonheadSTL I didn't say it was/would. I was just questioning his statement that 40 million people are worried.
They never stated they were using fresh, clean water. I would look more in the direction of Nestle if you want a private company to blame
NICE one sir thanks Nagpur
It is because of vibration, water reduces this.
Why is this so USA limited? The Soviet developed R7 family of spacecraft do not seem to need water, except for protecting the concrete beneath the burners. Also the Chinese. Everything the USA does seems crude.
It enhances the firework show😅😅
Hmm, rockets do NOT eject water at all. However, the launching pad they lift off from does. ;)
@DiGiaCom Tech
You are incorrect.
2 H2 +O2 ---> 2 H2O that's 1st year chemistry.
@@ImapatriotUSA ... Technically you are of course correct ... but you miss the point entirely (and not all rockers use the same fuels BTW). The video is about water emitting sound suppression systems built into the launch pad ... NOT the contents of the rocket engines exhaust (which does nothing to suppress sound) ... these are two (2) completely different things. Because of this the title of the video is incorrect.
It said MOST of the steam involved is from the condensing rocket exhaust (which is almost all steam). Some is from the deluge water boiled off by the heat of that exhaust. They did not explain, but I suspect the damage that is prevented, is from the acoustic energy that would otherwise reflect back up into the launch vehicle. The deluge must be turbulent, to disrupt & absorb that acoustic energy before it gets reflected. If (as suggested above) the wasted downward directed energies (kinetic & acoustic) were directed into some kind of storage system with low impedance, perhaps it would serve both to abate reflected acoustic damage, and salvage some of that wasted energy. Whether that is a practical idea, requires some technical and economic calculations.
You got Frequency right, and Amplitude wrong.
You missed a third source of water. The liquid hydrogen and liquid oxygen become water as they are combined in the combustion process to launch the rocket. Come on now!
Ummm, he combined the 2 in the first major source of water. Watch again.
In acoustics "timbre" is pronounced more like "tambre" fyi
Pressure relief
Thanks bro
Yeah, so, I see what you tried to do there with the climate change and overpopulation comment at the very end. Thanks. 🤨
Yer I noticed that. Trying to blame everyone else for something they contribute to in a massive way.
@@adrianbass5560yet overpopulation and climate change are real problems that should be discussed. Dont let your own sensitive ego blind you from that
@@SevenPr1me We should all be malthusians like our leaders. Yes, death is good.
@@jonk5669 or you could just use critical thinking and logic
@@SevenPr1me Yup. The logical solution to over population is death.
Nestle is losing their minds over this.
Making rain nd thunder easy then catching the lights nd breathing the clouds
Honestly, we are so primitive when I comes to space exploration, this is like a beta version computer
Yep, riding the big bomb into space. Not me. No thanks
2:46 \m/ Metallica
If it's not drinking water I could care less
So they can't use ocean water? The water right next to the launch pad? They use water that's used for drinking?
You shouldn't burn in the subtitles, so large. Remember, some eccentric lunatics, like me, still watch videos on a proper screen rather than a mobile phone. Mobile first is great, in theory, but the world has forgotten that not all web browsing is done on a mobile device.
Be watered my friend
Good one
My parents said everytime a shuttle went up it rained up the east coast.
Ppl dont realize a lot of rain is artificial in here...
Because it runs on water !
Make a video with metric units and you may have a viewer. And use m3 not liters.
Well where would I be.
Nice!!!
Elon Musk's Facon Heavy will much more powerful than the SLS.
Amount of noise in this video as result of music and bad microphone is way more damaging and annoying than produced by those poor rockets
"Even louder than a metal band concert"
Duh! I'm pretty sure a ROCKET is louder than a concert.
No, its saying even AFTER the suppression the dB STILL louder then a metal concert
It all seems rediculously wasteful to me
Overpopulation problem?
@Artem
Overpopulation is a myth.
@@ImapatriotUSA I thay iths a human mythake. ;-)
Ammozing 😲
You know there's a major water shortage in the western part of the United States right people are mighty thirsty
So, a year later, my friends in Phoenix, with their swimming pools, still have water coming out of their faucets. And I'm sure you've heard about the massive snowpack melting off and raising the lakes out there?
Bunch of nervous nellies 🙄
plenty money for rockets but not enough money for pensioners.
Plenty money for rockets???rather care about how much money your country spends on war effort
Um much more money was wasted on the middle east
I saw Metallica. No water. What’s up with that? Maybe just a couple of garden hoses and I might have some hearing left?
They should take that extra takeoff power and have it turn a Tesla turbine to generate his/ Elon's battery Banks.
Waste not. Or the energy could be stored in massive flywheels. It's easier to keep a mass moving, once it's moving.
One only has to build on it from there....
It would be interesting to see how effective a 'waste energy' recapture system could be. Perhaps a huge 'windmill' or turbine below the launch vehicle (rather than or in addition to the deluge system, could drive a compressor or (yes) kinetic storage device for other purposes.
Cool video but "Rockets eject water"???
And SpaceX doesn't seem to "require water"
And the world get in drier!
This just proved “Virgin space ship” is very efficient in flight to space!!!
Don’t need all that wasted waters and less environmentally damaging!!!
Not at all, the water isn't wasted, this is Florida, all you have to do is dig a small hole and within minutes you have a pond. It's brackish swamp/sea water that sits in the huge ponds at the launch complex, and after getting pumped to the pad it drains right back into those ponds. The "environmental impact" of the deluge system is zero.
You, you really need to read and research before posting such drivel
Pog video! 🦾
Too lower level in all the rivers and lakes .
Is the water really used (implying consumption) or merely moved from one location to another? I would think with the exception of humans and whatever water they have onboard, the amount of water on earth doesn’t change. Also, I highly doubt that water tower has anything to do with this.
It is used to absorb the acustic energy. Then whatever remains liquid flows back into the body of water it came from. If anything, there is a net gain of water due to the hydrogen and oxygen being burned into h2o. Uless that hydrogen and oxygen was created by seperating water in the first place.
The water tower is for storage and to increase the water pressure
@@jasonswiatkowski9127 I think, maybe, you missed the point of my question and doubt. I understand what they’re doing and why they’re doing it. The water is utilized as a cooling and sound dampening medium, but it’s not lost or consumed. My point is more about how it’s misleading in that, although they’re “using” large volumes of water, none of it is lost.
It would be smart to just keep recycling the water that doesn't evaporate off. Other wise yes the water on earth is the same BUT the ratio of fresh drinking water vs salty ocean water is decreasing. So basically we are running out of drinking water.
@@tsurumonetally4531 Who said it was fresh water?
@@prind142 1. I'm saying in general when we say that we are "running out of water" it's implies fresh water. Because the total water on Earth doesn't change much.
2. I really don't think they are using salty water around these Billion dollar rockets. Why would they ever risk the corrosion and getting the pipes calcified? After all, space X recycles their rockets and salty water would corrode them faster than normal. So overall, dumb idea to use sea water for this type of situation.
Muy interesante
Man if everyone had a brain like mine we wouldn't be making shit
Meanwhile we got UFOs that can travel to the moon n back in 2 seconds
Bet its not sea water that's far more available just saying
It looks like it is mostly the local brackish ground water of Cape Canaveral, where this SLF was built.
Timbre is pronounced tamm-bur
Классное видео
Pam chocolate chips turned into water color paint on her face smooth to the touch . And yo raisenettes are still chocolate coated.
And how is SS going to deal with this. ??!!
The ISS that has been in orbit for decades??
I would expect compressed air to be more combustible then water
I believe air can be compressed indefinitely so it can ingite at any amount
Evaporated
16 months ago
Half a million? Is that all? The Oil drilling related Fracking Service companies use 24X's that much on a directional oil well. EACH!!
Yeap, taking 12million gals of usable water and turning it too waste!
@EdwinLipton
Its not turning H2O into waste. Its easily recoverable by nature or man.
@@ImapatriotUSA The nasty synthetic toxic sludge they use for fracking is never recovered, except perhaps by local drinking & irrigation wells.
0:03 is when you manage to find the sweet spot inside your waifu.
Thank you President Trump for reviving the 🇺🇸 Space Programs such a great honor to be born in this great Country
…As do fresh bongs. 😎
Anybody else think Space X is way more relevant than NASA?
NASA is like AMD or NVIDIA. SpaceX is like TSMC.
Why can't NASA build a maga spring and sling shot the rocket into space 🤔
Look up 'catapult space launch' an experimental 100yd dia. vacuum container 'sling shot' for orbital payloads.
😮🔥🔥🔥