The edits were inconsequential to he photograph and were super tiny. When I saw the circles of the "edits" I thought they were so completely petty and ridiculous. I'm sure more obviously photos are far far worse and yet get a pass. The media focuses on the wrong things and even those are exactly the full truth.
As a Brit, I am also surprised to see Lilibet wearing knee high socks, especially when you consider Meghan was so insistent on her little bridesmaids going barelegged during her wedding. Little girls usually wear tights on these occasions to avoid chafing caused by new shoes, and according to podcasts with royal experts this was one of the reasons for Meg and Catherine’s disagreement on the matter.
And don’t forget that they are in California and it’s hot in California. Plus I don’t believe for a minute she has either a boy or a girl. It’s hard to have that when you have a hysterectomy.. and as I understand with Royals, you can’t have surrogates they don’t count as a Royals
@@EmmasMom-vi8qf not to mention, every savvy eye saw how completely awful their relationship was on the trips they chose to highlight. This card is for the simpleminded that these two have no respect for, I.e. John Foe public. No one else can stop laughing.
There was when Cathrine was falsed to share a photo on mothers day, while going through chemo. Why dont they just give their and the kids titles back, they can send out what ever cards they want
Dad is sharp, knowledgeable, sensible, not petty, and just so dad-like… makes me miss my own … I love how he’s not getting sucked into derogatory stuff. He’s very balanced and masterful in his opinion sharing… top notch pops!
People need to remember the appalling treatment meted out to a seriously ill Princess Catherine when she attempted to perfect a photo she had indeed taken of her family. She was subjected to a worldwide onslaught, when her only crime was to placate a press that would give her no peace and privacy!!
Megaliar needs to be be treated the same way her and her bully squad treated poor princess Catherine and bullied her into coming out while fighting cancer and her surgery to make a statement because of the Mega trashes lies.
At the time poor Princess Catherine was savaged for her Mother's Day photo, H and M stated they'd "never make that mistake" They are liars, hypocrites, and the laughing stock of the world. Thank you Sidley family for the great analysis! ❤ #istandwithcatherine
Oh yes, they really went to town on Catherine, but boy, she's dealt with that 100%... Where the media had the royal photos were open to most of the media, they messed up big time, because Catherine now takes the royal photos herself and the MEDIA have now got to ASK Catherine if they can USE THEM... Karma is beautiful... Pick on Catherine Princess of Wales, and you will be punished big time... This was down to pure jealousy with SLUG and TURDBALL... and all their photos are noticeably photoshopped, they're that bad it sticks out like a sore thumb, so SLUG's 'attention to detail' and 'they never make that mistake', jeez, SLUG needs to look at EVERY PHOTO SHE'S IN TO SEE HOW PHOTOSHOPPED THEY ARE... flawless skin' 🚩'perfect makeup' 🚩'made to look 20 years younger'🚩🚩🚩 The errors are that bad, it's a joke, just like that 2024 Business Xmas Card... 🤢🤢🤢🤮🤮🤮🤮🪣🪣🪣🪣GB
The funny thing is that after all we know about their fake kids, they continuer to make fake photos and take us for stupid people. Well…They are the stupid ones.😁😁😁
Those children had titles from birth, they were styled as Earl Archie of Dumbarton and Lady Lilbet, accepted Rachel did want that, she wanted the same as Prince William children who are heirs to the throne. All Rachel has ever done is lie. And when the truth about the birth of those two come out, Rachel was similarly say she had to use a surrogate because the Royal family didn’t want black grandchildren.
According to my High School Biology class, red hair is a recessive trait. Markle's dominant dark coloring would result in children with dark hair (and eyes). Those aren't her kids.
"As a mother", two things stand out: there's zero chance your children will run to you (unless they're acting or never see the parents), and family dogs always want to be part of the action (read: centre stage).
I am amazed that the 3 year old is the same size as her 5 year old brother. I am am also surprised that somehow Archie’s brown hair is now ginger. The other strange thing is the little girl has very long hair, one child is wearing a summer dress but the boy is ready for winter
I love how your Dad’s opinion is based 100% on facts, and what he see through his own professional eyes. No conspiracy theories with Kirk, and that is such a relief.
Why doesn’t the main stream media put a kill notice on this holiday card photo?. It’s Absolutely, totally photoshopped pic . It’s like they are now wanting to be called out.
They do play games with their pictures and if their intentions are for bad attention Allegedly MeGain could care less how it looks as long as she gets full attention Desperation!!!!! My opinion of course 🥴🥴
I was just coming to post this exact thing! 2 years apart would be a much bigger difference in size. I have kids that are 21 months apart, and they were never this close in size.
Agree. This was the first thing that struck me. I have never seen such a big three-year-old. And Archie seems to be wearing the same clothes from another photo.
Meghan wouldn’t care about the real parents wanting Christmas pictures. Faces can’t be shown because they don’t look like Markle’s, Raglands, Spencers, or Windsors. If they were Meghan’s children, they’d look like her, pre-plastic surgery. Faces need to be hidden until they are old enough for their own plastic surgery. Also, neither child is a red-head.
I couldn’t wait for this video since seeing that picture! Some other things I noticed: Harry has 6 fingers on his right hand. Betty has a clubfoot and is quite big for a 3 year old. She is as big as 5 year old Archie. Meghan’s top half is facing Archie but her legs and feet are facing the opposite direction.
Not too long ago (NY before he flew to the U.K. for the Wellchild event?), the dimwit said that she’s supposed to be gifted with her mom’s hair and was so long that she could sit on her hair
Thank You Ladies and Mr Sidley. The Harkles are "SICK" - The children "will ALWAYS BE LITTLE" because that's how a Narcissist "operates". A shocking photo of this shocking family.
My thought is the summer clothes for rented girl and winter sweater for a rented boy. Plus the Diana scene recreation proves it is staged, which is really disturbing on so many levels.
Don’t forget, the Meg also had “Betty” cosplay Charlotte one July 4th - same white dress with small blue flowers, white knee socks, and red Mary Janes.
I totally agree. When Princess Charlotte was a toddler she often wore smocked floral dresses. Meghain is trying to make Lili look like Charlotte.👑🏴🇬🇧
A longer arm than the long limbed 5' 10" Diana, when you compare those two photos. Notice how even then William was trying to read his troubled mother's eyes.
Regarding the photo of the kids I read a comment from a person that said and I quote "lived in Montecito and that the blue acanthus and blue Mexican sage in the are blooming, that occurs April-June. THATS WHEN THE PHOTO WAS TAKEN. That explains Lily’s summer clothes, which is a different season than Meghan’s and Archie’s clothes. If everyone was present at that same time, in summer, everyone would have dressed for hot California weather."
If that photo was taken in April-June latest, that would make the girl in the photo barely three years old IF it's Lily. No three year old I ever knew grew that big.
@@sandradavies7804 I actually have more issues with the dogs... they are in so weird poses, I had a dog she would never be so relax like that in that situation of excitment.
@@tsukinoyousei That is true. If your dog is ignoring you, run around excitedly and it'll come running to see what's happening. This whole photo is shopped to the max.
It has been documented Harry was angry and jealous that William was the first to be embraced by Diana’s open arms on the ship (as seen in the photo) that he kicked William. You can see this on the footage that this photo was taken.
20:14 That photograph of Dianna was not without a story. Apparently Charles was thanking all the staff on the ship who had been working to take care of him and Dianna, she shot off up on deck without a word to the staff and ran to the boys,, hence the photo. It is Royal protocol to thank the staff, and I would say that is the polite thing for any of us to do, but Dianna got the photo and Charles got the backlash for not being a caring dad. If there is anything I am learning, it is that Charles is a very caring father, and he was brought up with protocols.
@RachelDavies-wn7ir I thought that the photo put out by Catherine was put on their social media. I may be incorrect. Since Meghan and Harry are not working royals, maybe the press doesn't care.
Why should there be? The Wales family are heir to the throne. They are important. This family are celebrities living in America. Totally irrelevant what they do no msm will think it's newsworthy.
Meghan has one arm thats looks 6ft long! One of them has no hand. Little Better looking like she is 6 years but the poor lass has a club foot! Harry is defying gravity by the way he is squatting..and the list goes on. Welcome Dad, good to see you and to listen to your expertise xx
@judyweinstock9972 Looks clubbed, poor little girl and the black dog looks like he has a hind leg in place of a front left one! Harry is drying the laws of gravity by squatting like that... maybe he was seated before he was transported out of one photo into another. They are such a stupid pair....why not say..the boy luves with his birth mother in UK and little Better was an adoption that went wrong...either that or they have two kids as prisoners
Hello from the UK. I always enjoy watching your videos - it's beautiful seeing you as a family with your dad. So nice to see normal American families on TV 😊😊😊. You're quite clearly a lovely and supportive family. Betty is dressed British, but it's a certain class. Only upper class children of aristocratic or landed gentry background dress like that. I'd say they represent less than 5% of how most children are dressed in the UK. It's very stuffy and old fashioned but the royals like to do it to keep up tradition. Please know most other British children are dressed a little more contemporary than that...😂 Merry Christmas to you and thanks for your broadcasts. I love them!
I think they really like perpetuating the mystery of the childrens' faces. They love teasing the press and people, in general. Very weird. Feels kind of middle schoolish to me.
Also this is an official "seasonal greeting" card from the Archewell organisation - so its meant to be a professional corporate card - very odd to include a personal family photo
@@goldenpig0711 yes. Pointing out the input of the black lab an Megan’s long arms. I would have not noticed. I was so interested in how Lilly was taller and bigger than Archie.
What little Betty is wearing is what my daughter wore at 5 in 1985. I made her dresses because she was so tall and thin, off-the-rack didn't fit her or were made for much older girls.
Your dad rocks. It's always a joy (and educational) when he comes on your show for a photo analysis. I agree with him. H and his dog were dropped into the pic. As for the children, they're borrowed or rented. And MM is cosplaying Diana. Great work, Nancy & Stephanie! ❤💚❤💚
In the 🇺🇸, typically when it is warm, a 3 year old girl would be wearing cute ankle socks with lace, or pretty sandals! JMO - 66 year old mother, grandmother, retired pre-school teacher.
Hello, Twins I know everyone else is saying the same thing about Lili. 1) She looks really tall for her age. 2)The sunshine is hitting everyone on different parts of their body, but not Lili? Why does she look like she's in a shadow? There should have been some sun on her head and on her shoulders. 3) Lili is not warmly dressed, but her mother and brother are wearing long sleeves. Thank you Daddy Sidley for helping out the girls with the photos!
Considering Me-again didn't want the flower girls in her wedding (in England) to wear tights , I find it hard to believe she would let her daughter wear knee high socks in CA. Also, little girls haven't worn knee high socks since the 70s. ALSO, Lili is very tall for a 3 yr old.
Archiedoll tiny for a 5yo boy by comparison. Also still wearing the same clothes. Same a Littlebucks, only changed the pigtails to as the miracle pilot described. A waterfall to her waist, as he mam's.
Your dad is fantastic! I didn't even notice Meghan's arm until he brought it up. What I did notice is that you both have your dad's smile😊❤. Thank you all! Debbie
Harry's face looks like it was stuck on someone else. And has Lilibucks been wearing that dress since July 4th? In Spare, H said Mugsy made her own clothes. Maybe she could make her 'daughter' a new dress.
I thought 'Meghan' looked like Princess Catherine this was probably the look she was going for I would like to see a blown up version to really check it all out.
I still don't believe those are the real children in the pic. Is Archie stunted in that pic? Why is it OK for Meghan to photoshop and not get called out, but Catherine did it once and got blasted and Getty images wouldn't post Catherine's pic
This is off topic but I want to say how much I really enjoy the videos with your dad. I lost my dad almost 3 months ago and I miss him so much everyday. Seeing the interaction with you three is heartwarming. Merry Christmas!
Nah, he gets a pass from me. My son's hair changed weekly, it felt like. Red, blond, mousey, gold. As an adult the hair decided to settle on dark brown (we parents have similar genetic make up as H&M)
You guys hit the nail on the head with every point I noticed IMMEDIATELY when seeing that horrible "family" photo. Especially the Charlotte cosplay. 😂😂😂 You KNOW Meghan throws plates whenever people compare Charlotte to Diana AND the Queen. Love it so much. 😂😂😂😂👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
True narcissism is the only thing they are celebrating in _that_ card. What it says to me is, “we love ourselves, SO much! And, oh yeah…we have children…kind of…sort of.”
I agree. How can you say who those children are? They could be anyone. With the Wales children, you can see who they are clearly,in pictures,there is absolutely no doubt however in this monstrosity it could be anyone.
I just had a thought: it doesn’t say those two children are supposed to be theirs. They could just be the neighbours kids or someone else’s. I wouldn’t bet on it actually being them. The girl is def older than 3.5 and to me the boy is the same age as her. „We never said those were our children, the British press did“ - read in Harry’s horrible voice 🙃
I thought Megs hated girls in tights and socks...remember the wedding argument with Cathrine Princess of Wales. This picture has definitely been altered.. Your Dad is right on the mark. But why hasn't this picture been slapped with a kill notice
*I love your dad visiting. Betty's clothes are definitely Charlotte's Cosplay! The knee* *socks in Calif? Puhleeeeeeeease. Merry Christmas Twins, Dad and Mom!* 🎄🎋
Your Dad is methodical, and intelligent. I felt when he mentioned 'forensic' photography, that I was in the presence of someone who is attuned to the details while not prejudiced to any agenda. He was very fair in that way. A delight to have him join you today.
I believe HazMatand Betty are from one picture and MeGain and Archie are from a separate photo. That explains the size difference between the kids, as well as why they’re dressed for different seasons.
I distinctly remember the July 4th pic of Lily…. She had knee high socks on as well… and a dress very similar. It was odd because the weather is hot then, no kid would want high socks! Also a kid would typically wear red white and blue and maybe shorts. This seems weirdly similar
every little girl in Calif is wearing pink for Taylor Swift or Ariana Grande as Glenda/Wicked ...Betty is dressed in her 70's little house on the prairie look with no bracelets or hairbows .......this is not even possible IMO....if a stranger was taking the photo ,the dogs would be looking at and smelling the stranger .....if that is really how tall the kids are ,they are definitely old enough to go to Disneyland with a Disney guide keeping crowds away from them just like Kim K and family does
Pulling in the Garbage Bins is SUCH a Dad thing to do! I also agree with your Dad that Harry and the Black Lab were photoshopped. You can plainly see the ring around them. I also agree that she will try to monetize Little Betty - and it will have something to do with the name of "Lilibet" since she trademarked the Name.
CA kids haven't dressed that way (with knee socks) since the 70's -- I know because that is what my early childhood photos look like! AND - it's the same kind of dress/outfit she put her in for the July 4th parade -- so I think Twins are 100% right -- Meghan is going to market little kids Holly-Hobby-esque/Prairie clothing.
Yep, me too…I was 3 in 1967 but I didn’t wear knee socks until 1st grade in 1970 and wore them thru 8th grade (we wore Catholic school uniforms-jumpers and then skirts, American jumpers-dresses, not sweaters).
@@sandraobrien8705 Adding to @r.bellbottom8964’s list - babies, toddlers are often dressed with Bobby socks (short) - older girls might wear tights (or bare legs and no socks) with dresses. The socks to the knee are very “Brady Bunch” - very old fashioned in CA’s (very) casual and warm climate.
Icu RN here - there is absolutely no way that girl is a 3 year old toddler.🇦🇺 Hi Stephanie, Nancy & Papa Kirk! Have a wonderful Christmas & New Year, love from Australia ❤❤
@ yes! Plus her head size vs her body is not that of a 3yo. At 3-4 years of age, the head is nearly adult-sized, but because the body is not, the head should appear disproportionately large.
And the media in the UK went nuts over Princess Catherine's photo edits? Where is the media to talk about Meghan's photoshoping?
The edits were inconsequential to he photograph and were super tiny.
When I saw the circles of the "edits" I thought they were so completely petty and ridiculous.
I'm sure more obviously photos are far far worse and yet get a pass. The media focuses on the wrong things and even those are exactly the full truth.
Right, did the AP put this shot out? After all, their standards are so high.
That was driven by Misan and that Boozy jerk. They were the ones who started screaming and both of them are guilty of photoshopping.
@@KallaLily83 she isn’t worth the print !
@@KallaLily83 she is not royal
Interesting how the girl is always in socks, but she wouldn't stand for the flower girls to wear them in her wedding.
And dorky knee socks, to boot. Has anyone worn knee socks here in the US for decades?
@@anj6787...think more a British thing
@@anj6787, especially in sunny California!
@@anj6787and same dress as 4th of July 2023
@@anj6787 Don't worry, I'm here for that 😆
The only thing missing from that card is Diana hovering from the tree in a winged Mary Poppins outfit.
Great visual, lol.
😂
😂😂
😂
Brilliant! 🤣🤣👏🏻👏🏻
As a Brit, I am also surprised to see Lilibet wearing knee high socks, especially when you consider Meghan was so insistent on her little bridesmaids going barelegged during her wedding. Little girls usually wear tights on these occasions to avoid chafing caused by new shoes, and according to podcasts with royal experts this was one of the reasons for Meg and Catherine’s disagreement on the matter.
And don’t forget that they are in California and it’s hot in California. Plus I don’t believe for a minute she has either a boy or a girl. It’s hard to have that when you have a hysterectomy.. and as I understand with Royals, you can’t have surrogates they don’t count as a Royals
@@KJClark-l4m
Agree one hundred percent
Talking of feet and shoes, is it just me or does it look as though meee gain has three feet?
@@ChristineRead-ck1uq Yes. Yes. It does.
@@ChristineRead-ck1uq not just you😂
Little Betty is dang near the same height as Archie!
That’s the biggest 3year old I have ever seen, she looks like she’s at least 6. No way is that kid three years old.
Agreed@@ginajennings1664
I said almost the same thing.
With Betty only a couple of months older than 2, there is no way that child in the photo is her. Unless she has been given growth hormones.
That was my first thought too 😂
My congratulations to the Harkle's for having their children delivered by Amazon drivers
Omg lol😂
Or AI.
🤣
Lol 😂 excellent content 🎅🏽🌲⛄️
😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂😂
In my opinion, the way the parents are greeting the kids, it looks like they are meeting up for the first time in ages!
I think the children look like they are running towards the Harold character but it's all a fake. My opinion.
You are right. They are meeting after not seeing each other for a long time. Your comment was the best tonight!
I was going to make the same comment!
Visitation day
The girl had to have long straight hair because Charlotte has.
That is the most self-serving Christmas card I’ve ever seen.
@@EmmasMom-vi8qf not to mention, every savvy eye saw how completely awful their relationship was on the trips they chose to highlight. This card is for the simpleminded that these two have no respect for, I.e. John Foe public. No one else can stop laughing.
It’s just pathetic. They think they can fool the public but they only make their plight worse! Shallow
makes Princess Catherine's mother's day card look like a masterpiece lol
If William had done this there would be so much backlash, this is unbelievable
There was when Cathrine was falsed to share a photo on mothers day, while going through chemo. Why dont they just give their and the kids titles back, they can send out what ever cards they want
My heart is breaking for him😢💔
@@dawnsparks9207 that made me cry so much😢
If this was Prince Williams Card it would be a Christmas card and not a Happy Holidays but also done with class.
Giờ thì không ai buồn phản ứng về họ ,chẳng thèm quan tâm họ là thứ gì ..lướt qua ..giải trí .
Their Christmas card is horrible! 😵💫
Holiday card 🙄
Horrible
@ShelleyMunroS those children are running in the wrong direction. . Why are they running towards them lol .
That’s their Christmas card ….geez 😂
They should put out 2 cards - family and charity work.
Dad is sharp, knowledgeable, sensible, not petty, and just so dad-like… makes me miss my own …
I love how he’s not getting sucked into derogatory stuff. He’s very balanced and masterful in his opinion sharing… top notch pops!
Watch Harry will say later...." We never said it was Archie or Lili!" 😂
“The British press said that” lol. 😂🇨🇦
😂😂😂❤❤
Fave comment.
😂😂😂
They will say the British Press said that LOL!
Why would anyone in their right mind fake photos of their children? These two are NUTS!!!
What children?
Stormy
Look Harry hands closely fake.
Whackadoodle is the correct word
Because they are faking the children.
But They haveNO Kids - they were allRENT A KIDSand herPregnancies were allFake !!!!
It's been photoshopped so badly that the errors can be seen from outer space.
😅😅😅😅😂😂😂
Haha best comment, love it 😂😂😂
very funny comment. 😅
Will it be checked like Kate's photo shopped Mother's Day photo I wonder.
Bahahaha... I wish I said that!
I really enjoyed your dad’s analysis . He’s a charming man and really supports you two.
I really like how thoughtful their das was when he thanked the audience for supporting “the girls”. 🎉 So sweet!! 😊
People need to remember the appalling treatment meted out to a seriously ill Princess Catherine when she attempted to perfect a photo she had indeed taken of her family. She was subjected to a worldwide onslaught, when her only crime was to placate a press that would give her no peace and privacy!!
I said the same thing
Well said
Exactly
Megaliar needs to be be treated the same way her and her bully squad treated poor princess Catherine and bullied her into coming out while fighting cancer and her surgery to make a statement because of the Mega trashes lies.
Precisely! Where are AFP fact checkers now?
At the time poor Princess Catherine was savaged for her Mother's Day photo, H and M stated they'd "never make that mistake"
They are liars, hypocrites, and the laughing stock of the world.
Thank you Sidley family for the great analysis! ❤
#istandwithcatherine
Her "freakish attention to detail"😂😂
🎯🎯🎯
Oh yes, they really went to town on Catherine, but boy, she's dealt with that 100%... Where the media had the royal photos were open to most of the media, they messed up big time, because Catherine now takes the royal photos herself and the MEDIA have now got to ASK Catherine if they can USE THEM... Karma is beautiful... Pick on Catherine Princess of Wales, and you will be punished big time... This was down to pure jealousy with SLUG and TURDBALL... and all their photos are noticeably photoshopped, they're that bad it sticks out like a sore thumb, so SLUG's 'attention to detail' and 'they never make that mistake', jeez, SLUG needs to look at EVERY PHOTO SHE'S IN TO SEE HOW PHOTOSHOPPED THEY ARE... flawless skin' 🚩'perfect makeup' 🚩'made to look 20 years younger'🚩🚩🚩 The errors are that bad, it's a joke, just like that 2024 Business Xmas Card... 🤢🤢🤢🤮🤮🤮🤮🪣🪣🪣🪣GB
@@hilaryoldfield7869 Great comment!
The funny thing is that after all we know about their fake kids, they continuer to make fake photos and take us for stupid people. Well…They are the stupid ones.😁😁😁
The children have light skin and hair. Wasn’t MM complaining their kids wouldn’t get titles because their skin color was too dark?
Those children had titles from birth, they were styled as Earl Archie of Dumbarton and Lady Lilbet, accepted Rachel did want that, she wanted the same as Prince William children who are heirs to the throne. All Rachel has ever done is lie. And when the truth about the birth of those two come out, Rachel was similarly say she had to use a surrogate because the Royal family didn’t want black grandchildren.
👍
According to my High School Biology class, red hair is a recessive trait. Markle's dominant dark coloring would result in children with dark hair (and eyes). Those aren't her kids.
Too bad their hair is no longer red or pin-straight
! lol.
MM herself has light skin --- and she made that stupid comment to Oprah about marshmallow-white Archie! 🤣 Psychotic!
Oh I just adore your dad
He’s such a good human
Love your reporting
Xoxoxo
❤❤❤❤❤
"As a mother", two things stand out: there's zero chance your children will run to you (unless they're acting or never see the parents), and family dogs always want to be part of the action (read: centre stage).
@@maceyjayne Look at the distance of the beagle on the right. If real -it either doesn’t know or like Meghan
So true. Kids don’t run with their arms out like that it’s so staged. That’s the first thing I thought
Yes. The dogs would be jumping on the kids in excitement
Best comment! Even in that Diana picture, it was her who was running to them and opening her arms.
@@maceyjayne 100%!
I am amazed that the 3 year old is the same size as her 5 year old brother. I am am also surprised that somehow Archie’s brown hair is now ginger. The other strange thing is the little girl has very long hair, one child is wearing a summer dress but the boy is ready for winter
Harry did say the girl has inherited Meghans long hair🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣
Great points.
Exactly what I thought about the size of lil Betty 😂
Thats no 3 year old girl.
Ha, ha, it's a miracle 'Lil Betty...
I love how your Dad’s opinion is based 100% on facts, and what he see through his own professional eyes. No conspiracy theories with Kirk, and that is such a relief.
Your dad is super professional and his analysis is clear. Please thank him for sharing his knowledge
Invisibet is dressed for summer and Archificial is dressed for fall 😂
Why doesn’t the main stream media put a kill notice on this holiday card photo?. It’s Absolutely, totally photoshopped pic . It’s like they are now wanting to be called out.
Look what they did to poor Catherine!!!! MSM stinks.
I feel like they are trolling us atp
They do play games with their pictures and if their intentions are for bad attention Allegedly MeGain could care less how it looks as long as she gets full attention Desperation!!!!! My opinion of course 🥴🥴
Absolutely perfect response!
That was my first thought how is it fair for them but not for Catherine
Those two kids don’t look like two years different in age. Lilly is as big as Archie.
Archie looks stick thin
He looks sickly. @@madmelwood3778
Archie hasn’t grown since last picture
I’ve just seen your comment, I said exactly the same.
@@CarolNaylor-ys3lo “Archie” has been the same for 3 years. He’s a member of the lollipop guild, apparently.
Photo was taken in April because that’s when the blue agapanthus are blooming.
That means "the kids" would have been 2 and 4 because their "birthdays" aren't until May and June. Tut, tut, RMM, you goofed again.
At least part of the photo. For sure photoshopped
@@carolbythesea so Betty must be about 6 feet by now.
Good catch
Good Catch!!!
I like very much how Mr. Sidley shows impartiality and is very polite.
Markle and Archie are wearing jumpers and the other two are in summer wear 😂
I noticed that too.
Goos catch!
Yep
And Archibald in the pic is wearing the same clothes Eugenies son was wearing in one of their photos.
Jumpers???? 🤭 I think you mean sweaters...
How often does a 3 year old and a 5 year old look to be the same height? Ridiculous narcissistic overload
And she is further back so actually this child would be taller than “Archie”.
I thought that
I was just coming to post this exact thing! 2 years apart would be a much bigger difference in size. I have kids that are 21 months apart, and they were never this close in size.
Agree. This was the first thing that struck me. I have never seen such a big three-year-old. And Archie seems to be wearing the same clothes from another photo.
I thought that was odd too. There's about 3 years different between the two but they are around the same size.
Because the kids real parents want to be able to send out cards with their kids on it and they couldn’t do that if Megan and Harry showed their faces.
Meghan wouldn’t care about the real parents wanting Christmas pictures.
Faces can’t be shown because they don’t look like Markle’s, Raglands, Spencers, or Windsors.
If they were Meghan’s children, they’d look like her, pre-plastic surgery. Faces need to be hidden until they are old enough for their own plastic surgery.
Also, neither child is a red-head.
Great point!
Your dad is a delight to the show. More dad during the holiday seasons ❤🎉
I couldn’t wait for this video since seeing that picture!
Some other things I noticed:
Harry has 6 fingers on his right hand.
Betty has a clubfoot and is quite big for a 3 year old. She is as big as 5 year old Archie.
Meghan’s top half is facing Archie but her legs and feet are facing the opposite direction.
Plus Harry’s body and legs look off.
Peggy, YES!!! Thank you for pointing that out!! Half is photoshopped and the other AI
Good spot on the fingers
Not too long ago (NY before he flew to the U.K. for the Wellchild event?), the dimwit said that she’s supposed to be gifted with her mom’s hair and was so long that she could sit on her hair
Yes 100 percent on the feet!!! Just screenshot and zoomed in!!
The dogs back leg looks like an antique chair leg😵💫😵💫
And the right hind leg is missing.
Yes I thought that too
Yes, exactly!!!
And each dog is standing absolutely still?? C'mon. They really do think we're dumb. 😂😂😂😂😂
I had a staircase spindle come to mind. Just very odd.
Thank You Ladies and Mr Sidley. The Harkles are "SICK" - The children "will ALWAYS BE LITTLE" because that's how a Narcissist "operates". A shocking photo of this shocking family.
Welcome Kirk!!!! We love you as well!!!
Nanny had to tell the kids, "Go on children... That's your mom and dad, (I think)..."
😂😂😂😂
Good one.! Archie and Lilli wouldn't be able to pick Harry and megdusa out in a police line-up.🥴
🤣🤣🤣
@@jeffmcconniel2838 their agent telling them to gleefully run towards them as if they were your own parents
😂😂😂😂 and they must have said: "Are u sure?"
My thought is the summer clothes for rented girl and winter sweater for a rented boy. Plus the Diana scene recreation proves it is staged, which is really disturbing on so many levels.
They couldn't get the dogs to act excited and part of the family---they just stood there, most unnatural, looks like they didn't get the script.
Don’t forget, the Meg also had “Betty” cosplay Charlotte one July 4th - same white dress with small blue flowers, white knee socks, and red Mary Janes.
@@thehutch7728 hates England and the monarchy - all the while using titles and dressing the dolls in British fashion.
I totally agree. When Princess Charlotte was a toddler she often wore smocked floral dresses. Meghain is trying to make Lili look like Charlotte.👑🏴🇬🇧
@@KittensWithHelmetsI know make it make sense
Loved having your dad on. He was great. What a sweet guy.
That long arm thing is hilarious! Good call Mr. Sidley
3 points
Meghan does have long arms and legs.
They look like Frankenstein monsters.
A longer arm than the long limbed 5' 10" Diana, when you compare those two photos. Notice how even then William was trying to read his troubled mother's eyes.
neanderthal arms🤣
That you Kirk Sidley, we appreciate your VERY keen eye and drop in visit ( and as well, the way you all love each other is so great. )
Regarding the photo of the kids I read a comment from a person that said and I quote "lived in Montecito and that the blue acanthus and blue Mexican sage in the are blooming, that occurs April-June. THATS WHEN THE PHOTO WAS TAKEN. That explains Lily’s summer clothes, which is a different season than Meghan’s and Archie’s clothes. If everyone was present at that same time, in summer, everyone would have dressed for hot California weather."
If that photo was taken in April-June latest, that would make the girl in the photo barely three years old IF it's Lily. No three year old I ever knew grew that big.
@@sandradavies7804 I actually have more issues with the dogs... they are in so weird poses, I had a dog she would never be so relax like that in that situation of excitment.
@@tsukinoyousei That is true. If your dog is ignoring you, run around excitedly and it'll come running to see what's happening. This whole photo is shopped to the max.
Except that knee socks aren’t really summer clothes.
I wish ya'll would let dad talk, he's the one with the great insight
We thought we did better this time
The dog in the middle - his tail is way down. Usually dogs with their families have their tails up.
Usually dogs are jumping and wiggling all over the place when people arrive
Good point
Are they afraid of something😂
@@puffpiece1375Yes. I was surprised at how calm they were.
It has been documented Harry was angry and jealous that William was the first to be embraced by Diana’s open arms on the ship (as seen in the photo) that he kicked William. You can see this on the footage that this photo was taken.
Yes, I was about to make this same point!
I noticed he didn't look thrilled.
Hazbeen is patheticly childish and petty. He’s supposed to be 40 something?
20:14 That photograph of Dianna was not without a story.
Apparently Charles was thanking all the staff on the ship who had been working to take care of him and Dianna, she shot off up on deck without a word to the staff and ran to the boys,, hence the photo.
It is Royal protocol to thank the staff, and I would say that is the polite thing for any of us to do, but Dianna got the photo and Charles got the backlash for not being a caring dad.
If there is anything I am learning, it is that Charles is a very caring father, and he was brought up with protocols.
Spot on mandysmith 🙌
And good manners
Yup! It is definitely trying to recreate that Diana ship reunion photo. How pathetic but true to the Markles form.
Thats what Lady C says , of course Lady C was not there and does not move in British Royal Circles , so its her opinion .
@@samporter2146 is that in regard to what Mandy smith said,because this is a known fact from the photographers and reporters who were there that day
"Archie's" legs look like he is standing on a skatingboard - but without the board.
will the photo agencies show this holiday photo the same energy as the Wales Mother's Day photo? will there be a k!ll order?
They only check the photos that are issued to them, the ones on social media or holiday cards escape scrutiny.
@RachelDavies-wn7ir I thought that the photo put out by Catherine was put on their social media. I may be incorrect.
Since Meghan and Harry are not working royals, maybe the press doesn't care.
@@RachelDavies-wn7ir we must issue it to them. IMMEDIATELY!!!!!
Why should there be? The Wales family are heir to the throne. They are important. This family are celebrities living in America. Totally irrelevant what they do no msm will think it's newsworthy.
Meghan has one arm thats looks 6ft long!
One of them has no hand.
Little Better looking like she is 6 years but the poor lass has a club foot!
Harry is defying gravity by the way he is squatting..and the list goes on.
Welcome Dad, good to see you and to listen to your expertise xx
ok I wasn't only one to notice the club foot look about the girl child, I also though the way the boys legs were he had Cerebral palsy
Yeah, what's with Betty's left foot?
@judyweinstock9972
Looks clubbed, poor little girl and the black dog looks like he has a hind leg in place of a front left one! Harry is drying the laws of gravity by squatting like that... maybe he was seated before he was transported out of one photo into another.
They are such a stupid pair....why not say..the boy luves with his birth mother in UK and little Better was an adoption that went wrong...either that or they have two kids as prisoners
@BlackCatPanther Exactly and thf Twins father thought he looked okay!!! I didn't..
@@patriciavines1526 I wish the truth about those children would come out already and put an end to all these games
I'm a self diagnosed dog expert lol
Anytime children are "running" dogs are all eyes on them, the dogs are showing zero excitement towards that
Yes. There seems to be zero excitement amongst the dogs.
They recognise and reflect moods especially in their pack/family
Bcos it was photoshop how to be excited😂😂😂😂
@@evelynn7827 exactly 💯
Great observation
The dogs look bored and or lethargic.
Hello from the UK. I always enjoy watching your videos - it's beautiful seeing you as a family with your dad. So nice to see normal American families on TV 😊😊😊. You're quite clearly a lovely and supportive family.
Betty is dressed British, but it's a certain class. Only upper class children of aristocratic or landed gentry background dress like that. I'd say they represent less than 5% of how most children are dressed in the UK. It's very stuffy and old fashioned but the royals like to do it to keep up tradition.
Please know most other British children are dressed a little more contemporary than that...😂
Merry Christmas to you and thanks for your broadcasts. I love them!
Thank you and Merry Christmas to you.
Who puts a blurry photo on their Christmas card of the back of children's heads? That's just bonkers.
😂
I think they really like perpetuating the mystery of the childrens' faces. They love teasing the press and people, in general. Very weird. Feels kind of middle schoolish to me.
She wants to monetize when they show their faces.
Also this is an official "seasonal greeting" card from the Archewell organisation - so its meant to be a professional corporate card - very odd to include a personal family photo
It's amazing they are in a sunny place and none of them ever have a shadow.
They're vampires..... No shadows...
They're vampires..... No shadows. 😂
Your dad is the greatest. Love seeing him and having him sharing his expertise! ❤
@@goldenpig0711 yes. Pointing out the input of the black lab an Megan’s long arms. I would have not noticed. I was so interested in how Lilly was taller and bigger than Archie.
Me too! Yay Kirk Sidley!!!
What little Betty is wearing is what my daughter wore at 5 in 1985. I made her dresses because she was so tall and thin, off-the-rack didn't fit her or were made for much older girls.
Thanks, Mr. Sidley, for your excellent analysis. It's always wonderful to have you as a star guest 🌟
Your dad rocks. It's always a joy (and educational) when he comes on your show for a photo analysis. I agree with him. H and his dog were dropped into the pic. As for the children, they're borrowed or rented. And MM is cosplaying Diana. Great work, Nancy & Stephanie! ❤💚❤💚
Thank you Susan
Your dad is adorable. The family dynamic is just so sweet.
In the 🇺🇸, typically when it is warm, a 3 year old girl would be wearing cute ankle socks with lace, or pretty sandals! JMO - 66 year old mother, grandmother, retired pre-school teacher.
Hello, Twins I know everyone else is saying the same thing about Lili. 1) She looks really tall for her age. 2)The sunshine is hitting everyone on different parts of their body, but not Lili? Why does she look like she's in a shadow? There should have been some sun on her head and on her shoulders. 3) Lili is not warmly dressed, but her mother and brother are wearing long sleeves. Thank you Daddy Sidley for helping out the girls with the photos!
Meghan’s foot looks wrong to me also ? Pointing towards the little girl but her upper body is pointing towards the boy ?
Age 3
They’re gaslighting us all and want us to know it. They think they’re laughing at our expense. They forgot he who laughs last, laughs best.
Because the sun is all on the Meg!!
Photo extraordinaire Kirk Sidley! 🤩 Yay! What a lovely surprise to see him joining you girls tonight 👏 🥰 xxx
Considering Me-again didn't want the flower girls in her wedding (in England) to wear tights , I find it hard to believe she would let her daughter wear knee high socks in CA. Also, little girls haven't worn knee high socks since the 70s. ALSO, Lili is very tall for a 3 yr old.
Archiedoll tiny for a 5yo boy by comparison. Also still wearing the same clothes. Same a Littlebucks, only changed the pigtails to as the miracle pilot described. A waterfall to her waist, as he mam's.
I still see little girls wearing knee high socks in my area of the USA.
It's not their kids and the Harkles looked like they photoshopped their faces onto the real parents of the two kids.
@@blueberrylatte3097 agreed, the entire picture is a very poorly photoshopped creation.
@@feoltmanns7624 is it part of a school uniform?
Little Betty is wearing the same dress she ware on 4th of July last year
Your dad is fantastic! I didn't even notice Meghan's arm until he brought it up. What I did notice is that you both have your dad's smile😊❤. Thank you all! Debbie
Harry's face looks like it was stuck on someone else. And has Lilibucks been wearing that dress since July 4th? In Spare, H said Mugsy made her own clothes. Maybe she could make her 'daughter' a new dress.
I’ve noticed h’s baby picture face stuck on the rent a kids
His head is too big for his body. The black dog is photoshopped in the photo too. Weird.
Did they “move” haz’s facial hair to the top of his head? He suddenly shaved because William is now growing a beard?
Harry looks constipated.
Megsy makes her own clothes?! No wonder they don’t fit worth a hoot.
They expect us to believe they are parents!
Yea right!!
It's quite sick really.
Some people pointed out that megs feet are pointing towards betty but she's reaching out with that extra long arm towards archie.
Harry and meghan are screwing with their critics. That woman isn't even meghan. What kind of crap are they pulling?
I wondered that. I didn't think it was her
Are we sure?
I thought 'Meghan' looked like Princess Catherine this was probably the look she was going for I would like to see a blown up version to really check it all out.
Woman looks or is made to look like PofW, Catherine. Weird, these Sussex weirdsmobiles
There's something different about her hair.
In UK little girls would normally be wearing ankle socks with summer dresses sometimes with little frills
Exactly! And if it’s cold enough to wear a thick jumper like Archie has on, a three year old girl would be wearing a cardigan, at least.
I agree Kathy 😎
Thank you, I've been saying that all day. Plus I've never seen socks pulled right up over the knee like that. Usually they end just below the knee.
Ladies, your dad wins the "Father of the Century" award yet again!
Stephanie, you look so much like your dad!
I saw this picture and thought of Mr. Sidley right away! I’m no photo expert and could tell it was fake. Thank you girls and Santa Kirk!
Thank you for Father Sidley's expert analysis! That little girl is older than 3 of 3 1/2 years old.
Yes and bigger than the older child almost.
Absolutely, the kids look about the same size and age!!!!👎🏻🇦🇺
way older looking as well as very tall for a 3 year old.
Yes that is no 3 yr old toddler, and why is Archie's hair straight and red now , I've seen a picture of him with dark curly hair WTF
@@Babette-cr2zudefinitely a five or six year old, and not a 3 yr old toddler
I still don't believe those are the real children in the pic. Is Archie stunted in that pic?
Why is it OK for Meghan to photoshop and not get called out, but Catherine did it once and got blasted and Getty images wouldn't post Catherine's pic
Oh yay! Thank you for sharing your resident wiseman, Mr. Sidley, with us ❤
This is off topic but I want to say how much I really enjoy the videos with your dad. I lost my dad almost 3 months ago and I miss him so much everyday. Seeing the interaction with you three is heartwarming. Merry Christmas!
We are so sorry for your lost.
Dad is such a great sport. He obviously loves his daughters.
Six fingered Harry...thanks Mr. Sidley for your analysis of the photo. Thanks ladies for sharing! ❤
Amazing how Archie’s hair colour changes constantly ! Light brown, red, brown again, and now brilliant red again !
Not only different colours but this kids hair looks way more straightened, no curls & way more skinny too
Yeal, I noticed that too. It was dark when he was smaller ,now it looks lighter.
@@Katz55-t6uneither one has kinks???
and his little sister is taller than him.
Nah, he gets a pass from me. My son's hair changed weekly, it felt like. Red, blond, mousey, gold. As an adult the hair decided to settle on dark brown (we parents have similar genetic make up as H&M)
So much for her “freakish eye for detail.”
You guys hit the nail on the head with every point I noticed IMMEDIATELY when seeing that horrible "family" photo. Especially the Charlotte cosplay. 😂😂😂 You KNOW Meghan throws plates whenever people compare Charlotte to Diana AND the Queen. Love it so much. 😂😂😂😂👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽👏🏽
True narcissism is the only thing they are celebrating in _that_ card.
What it says to me is, “we love ourselves, SO much! And, oh yeah…we have children…kind of…sort of.”
Ever since the pic came out I was waiting for Pop Sidley.
He is adorable.
Me too
I agree. How can you say who those children are? They could be anyone. With the Wales children, you can see who they are clearly,in pictures,there is absolutely no doubt however in this monstrosity it could be anyone.
Yes!!! I agree! Why is she wearing long white socks in California! Also, she seems super tall for a three year old! 🥴xxx
Harry, Meaghanand Archie are wearing fleece or sweaters.
Lily is in a short sleeve dress.
It’s winter now! It’s been mainly upper sixties lately (Fahrenheit).
Same as in the july 4th pic, but with red mary jane shoes in the summer, go figure
@@MeItsMeLol I don't think they would leave it this late in the year to take Christmas card photos, they aren't recent photos in my opinion.
@@Lynda-vq5yl , well I have no idea who is even in the photo. I was merely stating why someone would consider wearing knee socks in California.
I just had a thought: it doesn’t say those two children are supposed to be theirs. They could just be the neighbours kids or someone else’s. I wouldn’t bet on it actually being them. The girl is def older than 3.5 and to me the boy is the same age as her.
„We never said those were our children, the British press did“ - read in Harry’s horrible voice 🙃
They never announced those are their kids in the image. Could be just a family idea.
Who puts other people's kids on a Christmas card though? 🤔
@@desireeretiree the Harkles
Mr Sidley’s analysis is what we’ve all waited for! ❤
I thought Megs hated girls in tights and socks...remember the wedding argument with Cathrine Princess of Wales. This picture has definitely been altered.. Your Dad is right on the mark. But why hasn't this picture been slapped with a kill notice
*I love your dad visiting. Betty's clothes are definitely Charlotte's Cosplay! The knee*
*socks in Calif? Puhleeeeeeeease. Merry Christmas Twins, Dad and Mom!* 🎄🎋
Even British children generally are not dressed like this. It’s a very traditional old fashioned look that the royals tend to like
And wasn't she wearing a blue and white floral dress in the last pic of her...over a year ago
@@madmelwood3778 *Yes, but the one*
*had longer sleeves she wore red shoes*
*just like Charlotte's.* 🙄
Merry Christmas Trudy
@@sidleytwins4823 *Awww thank you*
*so much Nancy and Stephanie...You*
*made my day! You have the Merriest*
*of Christmas! Love, joy and Peace!* 🎄
Your Dad is methodical, and intelligent. I felt when he mentioned 'forensic' photography, that I was in the presence of someone who is attuned to the details while not prejudiced to any agenda. He was very fair in that way. A delight to have him join you today.
Mr Sidley (Dad), you’re awesome.🇦🇺😃🥰
I believe HazMatand Betty are from one picture and MeGain and Archie are from a separate photo. That explains the size difference between the kids, as well as why they’re dressed for different seasons.
Everybody loves Kirk Sidley… and his beautiful daughters 🥰
We love you Helen
I distinctly remember the July 4th pic of Lily…. She had knee high socks on as well… and a dress very similar. It was odd because the weather is hot then, no kid would want high socks! Also a kid would typically wear red white and blue and maybe shorts. This seems weirdly similar
But....if it's a Red, White and Blue event wouldn't Lilibucks be dressed in Emerald Green?
every little girl in Calif is wearing pink for Taylor Swift or Ariana Grande as Glenda/Wicked ...Betty is dressed in her 70's little house on the prairie look with no bracelets or hairbows .......this is not even possible IMO....if a stranger was taking the photo ,the dogs would be looking at and smelling the stranger .....if that is really how tall the kids are ,they are definitely old enough to go to Disneyland with a Disney guide keeping crowds away from them just like Kim K and family does
Agreed! I have a daughter and she’s never worn knee socks! She either wore tights or low socks with gym shoes. This whole thing is bizarre.
And Hazbeen was in same coloured shirt
Just when you think we can’t love the twins any more-we meet DAD!! Love this family!!
Love you too Lelia
@ Aww! So sweet! Thank you!
Pulling in the Garbage Bins is SUCH a Dad thing to do!
I also agree with your Dad that Harry and the Black Lab were photoshopped. You can plainly see the ring around them. I also agree that she will try to monetize Little Betty - and it will have something to do with the name of "Lilibet" since she trademarked the Name.
CA kids haven't dressed that way (with knee socks) since the 70's -- I know because that is what my early childhood photos look like! AND - it's the same kind of dress/outfit she put her in for the July 4th parade -- so I think Twins are 100% right -- Meghan is going to market little kids Holly-Hobby-esque/Prairie clothing.
Yep, me too…I was 3 in 1967 but I didn’t wear knee socks until 1st grade in 1970 and wore them thru 8th grade (we wore Catholic school uniforms-jumpers and then skirts, American jumpers-dresses, not sweaters).
@@sandraobrien8705 Sandals, flip flops, no-show socks with sneakers or other shoes, maybe anklets.
And leggings or jeans with a cute colorful t-shirt or sweat shirt depending the weather.
@@sandraobrien8705shorts and sleeveless tops in the summer. Long casual pants and a shirt and sweatshirt in an area like Montecito in the winter.
@@sandraobrien8705 Adding to @r.bellbottom8964’s list - babies, toddlers are often dressed with Bobby socks (short) - older girls might wear tights (or bare legs and no socks) with dresses. The socks to the knee are very “Brady Bunch” - very old fashioned in CA’s (very) casual and warm climate.
Christmas wishes to Mr Kirk Sisley and his Beautiful Twin Daughters ❤️🌹❤️🌹❤️🌹🇺🇸🍀🇨🇦🇬🇧🎁🎅🤶🦮
Merry Christmas to you Irene
@@sidleytwins4823 Christmas Wishes all the way with Santa 🌹🌹🎅🤶🎁🎁
Plus I must ask forgiveness for Getting your Surname Wrong (Sidley) 🥰
Icu RN here - there is absolutely no way that girl is a 3 year old toddler.🇦🇺 Hi Stephanie, Nancy & Papa Kirk! Have a wonderful Christmas & New Year, love from Australia ❤❤
She didn't have a toddler's chubbiness, even with slim children they keep some baby fat, she looked more like a four to five year old at the youngest.
@ yes! Plus her head size vs her body is not that of a 3yo. At 3-4 years of age, the head is nearly adult-sized, but because the body is not, the head should appear disproportionately large.
Merry Christmas and Happy New Year Liz
Fantastic analysis done by Dad,, thank you for coming on! 😊🎉