San Diego museum fires up Wright Flyer engine replica

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 16 гру 2021
  • A replica of the engine used in the first 1903 flights of the Wright Brothers in Kitty Hawk, North Carolina, is run briefly Dec. 17, 2021, on the anniversary of the first powered manned flight. The display was at the San Diego Air and Space Museum in Balboa Park, San Diego. For story and photos, see Times of San Diego.

КОМЕНТАРІ • 23

  • @humbertothebeliever2443
    @humbertothebeliever2443 2 роки тому +12

    Amazing the Brothers built this in their bike shop over a century ago. Sadly, that very shop is facing demolition for lack of maintenance and funding. Someone in Congress or a wealthy citizen should save that iconic building from destruction.

  • @fernandohood5542
    @fernandohood5542 Рік тому +6

    Imagine the skills of the engine builder and machinist back in the day.

    • @mmserver6890
      @mmserver6890 Рік тому

      Certain better than the skills of the camera person...jiggle jiggle jiggle...I was getting a headache.

  • @tsbrownie
    @tsbrownie 9 місяців тому +2

    Thank you. That was something to see/hear. It's hard to fully appreciate the effort put into that these days since a single cylinder 4 stroke 12 hp engine at 33 kgs (72 kbs) can be ordered online.

  • @chasebh89
    @chasebh89 2 роки тому +8

    Lubrication was more of a suggestion back then

    • @cass4114
      @cass4114 2 місяці тому

      with no lube wouldn't the eng size up?

  • @jamest.5001
    @jamest.5001 Рік тому +4

    Charlie Taylor who built the wrights engine , made the crank from a block of steel, and drilled holes and broke chunks out, to get a crude roughly crank shape. That could then be put in a lathe, it only took him 6 weeks to build the engine from scratch! With better valves and a intake cam, a( more modern carburetor, from say the 1920's like from a Model A ford );modern carburetor , I'm betting it could mske 25-30 hp, get a bit of overlap on the valves. Use the exhaust to pull in air to the cylinder from the intake, this could possibly be simulated by using weak springs on the intake, and making the valve heavier, so the leaving exhaust can possibly pull the intake valve open just before the piston passes tdc! And adding a simple oil pump to spray every with oil, and if it burns a exhaust valve , then it must not been sealing completely, the slightest hole or gap exposed to combustion, it will quickly start cutting like a torch! A blown head gasket can cut a notch out of the block and or head,
    But the engine can be made lighter, drill out the center of the rod journals,
    Possibly the main journals, lighten the pistons and rods, allowing for much lighter counterweights. And lighten the flywheel, put the majority of weight on the outer edge, so it can still store enough energy, it would be awesome if this could be a compression ignition oil burner! Beef up the crank and block a bit. Raise the compression to about 20:1. And thicker dome pistons, with oil squirters, and a oil cooler, design a light weight high pressure low volume fuel sprayer/injector, this injection could possibly be more efficient than the most modern engines, cleaner and more mpg, I think it could still make more than 12hp, and lots more TQ! Possibly 20hp and 50-60 ftlbs TQ! Allowing higher over driven gear ratio, spinning the props just as fast lower engine speeds, using a variable prop, use a governor to maintain RPM, keeping the props at speed, only change the angle of attack to regulate thrust, possibly mount a small flywheel on the shaft with the prop, to reduce stalling from sudden attack angle changes, but it's easy to say this when you have history to look at and learn from, being the first to do something is difficult!!
    Charlie Taylor and the wrights were awesome! ✌️

  • @EATSLEEPDRIVE2002
    @EATSLEEPDRIVE2002 11 місяців тому +1

    It seems they mounted the camera to the crankshaft as well

  • @yogibeer9319
    @yogibeer9319 2 роки тому

    So cool!

  • @chrismofer
    @chrismofer 9 місяців тому

    just awesome. the sound of the engine plus the abilities of the flyer would have made the first powered flight attempts very scary.

  • @yogibeer9319
    @yogibeer9319 2 роки тому

    That’s so cool!

  • @Robert-pg2id
    @Robert-pg2id 15 днів тому

    Did they fire up a replica of Gustave Whitehead's engine that flew 2 years before the Wright Brothers in 1901 in Bridgeport, Connecticut. ??

  • @hyzercreek
    @hyzercreek Рік тому

    Charlie made the crank shaft by hand

  • @JohnKSedor
    @JohnKSedor 2 місяці тому +1

    This video needs to be corrected to give Gustave Whitehead the credit for flying 2 years before the WRONG BROTHERS, and he did it in Bridgeport Connecticut in 1901. Whitehead may have even flown as early as 1899.!!

  • @davidcouch6514
    @davidcouch6514 Рік тому +1

    I recall an early 60’s “Mr. Science” type show in discussing the Wrights fashioned a carburetor from a Tomato Can. I remembered that aspect after 60 years. Maybe someone can conform the carburetor account.

    • @FarmerFpv
      @FarmerFpv 10 місяців тому +1

      It never had a carburetor.

    • @davidcouch6514
      @davidcouch6514 10 місяців тому

      @@FarmerFpv a 60.5 year “Oh”.

  • @shantisadan8888
    @shantisadan8888 11 місяців тому +1

    Have u heard abt shivkar ji ?

  • @yogibeer9319
    @yogibeer9319 2 роки тому

    👍🏻

  • @tebenedict
    @tebenedict Рік тому +1

    Alguém já voou com uma réplica do Flier e um motor de 12 HP?

    • @gabrieldegois8687
      @gabrieldegois8687 Рік тому +1

      this 12hp motor was bought when they went to france. No one in history never saw something comming off the ground with their original 8hp which they claimmed as making 53km flights back in the countryside.

    • @tebenedict
      @tebenedict Рік тому

      @@gabrieldegois8687 So it is. Allied to this finding of aeronautical engineering, even the modern one, together with the little evidence of the first flights, it is difficult to believe that they flew first.

  • @chrisholmes1589
    @chrisholmes1589 2 роки тому

    The Times can't afford a tripod or microphone?