good luck keeping up with future technological advancements, we as a species have come to a point in time technology wise where the next 10yrs is going to be equivalent to the last 100yrs of tech advancements.
1:47 You forgot to mention that the remaining 46% of Californian farmers never suffer labour shortages also just happen to be the farmers who pay their workers a fair wage.
I can recall my Father telling me about using bubbles on a ship's hull some 45 yrs ago. He was a marine engineer and inventor. Unfortunately he died soon after this.
For retro fitting, it's problematic. The issue with air under the hull in traditional propeller placement is propulsion. The propellers can become usless in air streams. Because they use water to produce thrust. It's a good idea and with redesign of traditional systems, it could easily increase thrust. I like it. ❤
If use the inlet water infront then eject out alone the hulls so it further accelerate and reduce drag It can make air craft carrier had boeing speed 500 miles per hour
I invented that when I was 15. I am 72 now, so, to me, this is old tech. ;-) Just goes to show that you should never think "If this hasn't been invented, it won't work."
This technology is unfortunately not new but stems back to over a thousand years or more! The Viking long boats used the same method except for the blower, the plank upon plank method of construction, where air would go along the hull in the channels formed of the plank’s laid up on each other. This was found in the Mediterranean vessels as well.
Thank you so much for this amazing video! Could you help me with something unrelated: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?
Is advaced technologies making us happier. Are we happier to day than in the 1960. Will this technologies make us happier in ten years? Is our earth gaming from this development?
The AI generated audio track IS PURE TRASH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! At least for Portuguese ,This AI MIX Spanish Whit English so its hallucinating as a HELL!! Too low precision used IMHO.
that radar jamming/spoofing drone is all fun and games until you try it against a nuclear power and they fire one off in retaliation thinking they're being invaded full force...
The bubbles under the hull was done 50 years ago and the authorities couldn’t classify it. They couldn’t decide whether it came under the aviation or marine authorities. It was proved to increase speed by less drag and save fuel by using less horse power to drive.
This is not new. Viking klinker-built ships did just that without a blower, which is what made them so fast. If you've ever been to a fjord you'll know that they are crystal clear and a bot builder would have been able to go underwater and see that the air was pushed under the front of the boat and pushed along the klinkers and out the back.
"replacing the work of dozens of labourers"... err 2. (I know how much labour it takes to feed 280 cows.) Go to Mars or Venus? One objective progresses science the other progresses both science and humanity - maybe combined efforts is the better strategy - its not as if Venus is going anywhere...
helium filled balloons for under water'''' think you got that wrong as the boianseiey between air and same volume helium is barely readable as to the cost air wins out. if you are attempting to educate at-least get it right. P.S. the computer that made this program did not make a mistake the humans that programed it did
UFOs create no friction by bending space around the spacecraft, whereas I wonder if instead of putting air bubbles under the boat, could they put them in front of the boat, so, that it would surround the boat causing a similar frictionless experience, ultimately allowing the vessel to go even faster?🚤
Hay un monton de IA que van de texto a voz mucho mejor que esta que usas en el video, es espantosa la voz se entiende poco sobretodo, porque no sabes usarla ya que escribis números y siglas y no texto uy las siglas diciendolas como suenan y no solo siglas. *mala muy mala elegir esta ia*
CO2 is GOOD for the environment. Plants/Trees/Fruits need CO2 to grow. Actually the level of CO2 is one of the lowest in the last 250,000,000 years. Pollution is bad, but CO2 is not pollution.
I'm really curious how you came to this conclusion. Let's make this a bit easier to relate to. You and I are walking around a tree in an otherwise empty field in the same direction. I'm twice as far from the tree as you are. How is it impossible for you to never be on the other side of the tree from me. You are still closer and we are both still walking around the tree in the same direction.
Fantastic program 💙
good luck keeping up with future technological advancements, we as a species have come to a point in time technology wise where the next 10yrs is going to be equivalent to the last 100yrs of tech advancements.
Using air on ships' bottoms has been known for many decades Bubbles have also been used with torpedoes.
Please review the Aptera solar electric vehicle in your next round.
1:47 You forgot to mention that the remaining 46% of Californian farmers never suffer labour shortages also just happen to be the farmers who pay their workers a fair wage.
And laborers picking crops are not feeding the farm animals. I really don't see a need for "dozens" of laborers needed to feed the herd.
The NASA/Venus mission is fascinating! Now, if they can only get their two astronauts back from the orbiting space station…
I can recall my Father telling me about using bubbles on a ship's hull some 45 yrs ago. He was a marine engineer and inventor. Unfortunately he died soon after this.
wonderful. Glad to see someone using their brain. If we can get a bit of this on, that should be fine for the emissions. Apply it to mass transit.
For retro fitting, it's problematic.
The issue with air under the hull in traditional propeller placement is propulsion.
The propellers can become usless in air streams.
Because they use water to produce thrust.
It's a good idea and with redesign of traditional systems, it could easily increase thrust.
I like it. ❤
If use the inlet water infront then eject out alone the hulls so it further accelerate and reduce drag It can make air craft carrier had boeing speed 500 miles per hour
Yes 🎉😊😊
I like your video however you need to find the updated Tech of spell check for your titles take a quick peek
That boat invention with bubbles released on the bottom of the ship to reduce fuel consumption….is genius. People congratulations to the inventor
I invented that when I was 15.
I am 72 now, so, to me, this is old tech.
;-)
Just goes to show that you should never think "If this hasn't been invented, it won't work."
Good idea
But the bubbles would cause the propellers to work harder for the same speed since they would reduce the specific gravity of the water
This technology is unfortunately not new but stems back to over a thousand years or more!
The Viking long boats used the same method except for the blower, the plank upon plank method of construction, where air would go along the hull in the channels formed of the plank’s laid up on each other. This was found in the Mediterranean vessels as well.
@@anthonykenny1320 That's why the propellers are not in the bubbles path.
@ that makes sense
Thank you so much for this amazing video! Could you help me with something unrelated: I have a SafePal wallet with USDT, and I have the seed phrase. (alarm fetch churn bridge exercise tape speak race clerk couch crater letter). Could you explain how to move them to Binance?
Pésima la traducción. Estoy seguro de que la Inteligencia Artificial tiene algo mejor que ofrecer.
Why would you use helium for flotation in water?
Stara technologia. W kajaku mam taką.
Is advaced technologies making us happier. Are we happier to day than in the 1960. Will this technologies make us happier in ten years? Is our earth gaming from this development?
Hi😊
Now I can use my air hockey table as a boat
9:22 this is another mono rail system.. over priced, low rider ability.. so not useful
Simpson's even proved this
I wonder if this system will have its own song.
I guarantee you that divers are NOT using helium filled balloons to guide artificial reefs to the ocean floor.
its expensive to buy
The AI generated audio track IS PURE TRASH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! At least for Portuguese ,This AI MIX Spanish Whit English so its hallucinating as a HELL!! Too low precision used IMHO.
😂😂😂 true
that radar jamming/spoofing drone is all fun and games until you try it against a nuclear power and they fire one off in retaliation thinking they're being invaded full force...
La traducción al español es pésima, es preferible escuchar el audio en ingles, se entiende mucho mejor que el audio traducido...
Helium balloons to float artificial reefs into place, just use air like everyone else and there are better ways to re-populate a reef.
Britestorm... inspired dns attack ala overwhelming an irondome-5000 rockets?
If Venus is on the opposite side of the Sun then there is a very big chance that Mercury or Mars will be the closest planetary neighbor.
lee-dar? I assume you mean Lidar (lie-dar)
So man has spent millions developing to solutions we never realised there was a problem 😂😂😂😂
The bubbles under the hull was done 50 years ago and the authorities couldn’t classify it. They couldn’t decide whether it came under the aviation or marine authorities. It was proved to increase speed by less drag and save fuel by using less horse power to drive.
Administration was the brake 😢
This is not new. Viking klinker-built ships did just that without a blower, which is what made them so fast. If you've ever been to a fjord you'll know that they are crystal clear and a bot builder would have been able to go underwater and see that the air was pushed under the front of the boat and pushed along the klinkers and out the back.
Nasa can't even land on the moon😂😂😂
NASA going to Venus.😅
“WIIL”? I think you mean “will”.
Min 1-2 i have that idea in 2004, but not continue to lab scale…….LOL
"replacing the work of dozens of labourers"... err 2. (I know how much labour it takes to feed 280 cows.) Go to Mars or Venus? One objective progresses science the other progresses both science and humanity - maybe combined efforts is the better strategy - its not as if Venus is going anywhere...
helium filled balloons for under water'''' think you got that wrong as the boianseiey between air and same volume helium is barely readable as to the cost air wins out. if you are attempting to educate at-least get it right. P.S. the computer that made this program did not make a mistake the humans that programed it did
UFOs create no friction by bending space around the spacecraft, whereas I wonder if instead of putting air bubbles under the boat, could they put them in front of the boat, so, that it would surround the boat causing a similar frictionless experience, ultimately allowing the vessel to go even faster?🚤
There may be UFO's out there but we are yet to see them. So far it's been all BS.
Hay un monton de IA que van de texto a voz mucho mejor que esta que usas en el video, es espantosa la voz se entiende poco sobretodo, porque no sabes usarla ya que escribis números y siglas y no texto uy las siglas diciendolas como suenan y no solo siglas. *mala muy mala elegir esta ia*
A child presented obama of a lamp she created powered bybsea water …shes gone so as her lamp
CO2 is GOOD for the environment.
Plants/Trees/Fruits need CO2 to grow.
Actually the level of CO2 is one of the lowest in the last 250,000,000 years.
Pollution is bad, but CO2 is not pollution.
Good try but aí Will never bê a person almost portuguese mb later
Funny, NASA can't even get the two astronauts back to their families.
Esa pista de audio en "español" es ridícula, insufrible 👎🏻
la IA todavia no sabe hablar. español the IA doesn't. stl know. how. to speak spanish
25,000per hr???that sounds made up.😅😂
Humanless automation sounds pretty flawed, and dangerous.
Yes pretty much but at the same time reduced work load so people can relax
it not GOING TO HAPPEN TO SPACE TRIP. BECAUSE US IS NOT ABLE TO DO THAT ON EATHER WAY MONEY AND TACH. US NASA IS OVER FOR SUCH MISSION.
No, Venus is never on the "other side" of the sun from Earth's perspective because it orbits closer to the Sun than Earth does,
Sometimes it's on the other side of the sun.
Got to love it when ppl talk crap they don’t know and it shows, lmfao
I'm really curious how you came to this conclusion. Let's make this a bit easier to relate to. You and I are walking around a tree in an otherwise empty field in the same direction. I'm twice as far from the tree as you are. How is it impossible for you to never be on the other side of the tree from me. You are still closer and we are both still walking around the tree in the same direction.
My shoes are brown because the sky is blue.
O vídeo é bacana,mas essa narração é uma porcaria.
Arrrrf ! ! ! Tinha que vir com essa ESTUPIDEZ FALACIOSA de "REDUÇÃO DE EMISSÃO DE CARBPNO" ? ! ! !
Parei de assistir na hora e deixei um 👎
adios
De você gosta tanto de carbono vá morar dentro de um cano de escapamento😂
Why can’t they build something for people’s health and fight Disease 🦠