One of my cars which I had in my teen years was an Olds 98 convertible. It was not the "Fiesta" but still was a gorgeous car. I was in high school in the mid 1950's when I had it. It was fire engine red with duals of course which were great sounding. It rmains one of my al time favorite cars along with the 5 '65 Buick Rivieras I had, 2 of which were GS's~my all time favorite car.
Exactly! How is a 1964 Mustang silly? And unless you’re from another planet, you’ve heard of the 1964 (actually 1964 1/2) mustang. Not only that. But it’s obvious that AI wrote this based on the formal wording.
@@dmandman9 Soulless, and backasswards. I never made it to the 2-minute mark, but seeing the Oldsmobile and Corvette was enough. Both are beautiful cars.
The title of your video is completely off base from what the video shows and is about. And I really hate the AI generated Franken car picture on the watch this video display
I agree Tom. I was born in 1935 and I owned a few of these so-called silly cars from the 50's. I could do my own engine replacing almost all by myself, but now, no way. I miss the old days for sure.
@@normanwyatt8761 My Dad and I rebuilt the engines on a 1950 Chevy and a 1960 Dodge in our carport back in the day. Today I lift the hood of my car and don't know what I am looking at. Cars when I was a kid were works of art and I always looked forward to seeing the new cars when they came out. Today not so much, they all look alike and not at all stylish! Cadillacs used to be Cadillacs but today they are little overpriced, upgraded Toyotas.
I'm a car lover, so I'm a bit confused by the title of this video. Did you title the video to draw more people in or do you not know what you're talking about? Some of these cars are considered classics.
An excellent review of "50s cars ; but I do not understand the title of your Show . Many set new concepts and engineering while others showed extreme styling.
You're showing a 1953 Chevrolet Corvette engine, talking about it being a 6 cylinder, yet you show what is obviously a V-8 engine. I can't watch any more. You have a great concept but did poorly in executing it.
This wonderful collage of mid century cars is spoiled by the misinformation and by the addition of customized & altered examples. And worse yet, the AI narrator calls these milestone cars, “silly” and at one point, “bizarre”. Two words that better describe this video. Nice try, though.
Aside from thee low fuel economy and th osteentatious styling I don't see what was "Silly" about some of the greatest dcars of all time? Something had to be positive about the 1960s and the cars were one of those things! Thy were so KEWL!!
I remember seeing most of these cars live and affording to drive them was inexpensive since gas was 25 and 35 cents per gallon during the fifties and sixties. The cost to buy for some wasn't too difficult if you earned at least 2.00 to 3.00 dollars per hours if my memory serve me correct.
I don't know about the Corvette being silly, but it was a poor car, when word got out about how bad the 1953 corvette was. The last new 1953 corvette never sold until 1959. GM couldn't give them away.
@@richardmerriam7044 I knew guys that owned MG's they had a 4 cylinder, yet they were sporty. The problem with the Corvette was not the size of the engine it was the fact that the car was a tank!
who comes up with this crap? The 1964 Mustang was "silly'????? The video does not match the narration, for the 1953 Corvette it describes an in line 6 but shows a V8. this is a stupid waste of time.
Let's face it: DRIVE TV MAKES GARBAGE CONTENT! They don't seem to understand the English language. The titles never match the content. The content shows little insight. This stuff just isn't very good. Life is way too short to waste on this crap.
If I watch it, I still consider, I can't stand Coupés that much and really hate Convertibles. You pay more for less car, for the well sortet crap. Sorry for my honesty. Bring back the urban Sedan... or Station Wagons nobody seems to care anymore.
Obviously this is a list made by someone who thinks tge cars made today are stylish. Most cars made today look very much alike unlike the actual styling of cars of tge 50s, 60s and 70s.
► Watch this video: 30 Silliest Pickups Trucks of All Time! You've Never Seen Before!: ➜ ua-cam.com/video/avJL7dxgF1E/v-deo.htmlsi=sCyKS9x_Nuz5Xrfs
One of my cars which I had in my teen years was an Olds 98 convertible.
It was not the "Fiesta" but still was a gorgeous car.
I was in high school in the mid 1950's when I had it.
It was fire engine red with duals of course which were great sounding.
It rmains one of my al time favorite cars along with the 5 '65 Buick Rivieras I had, 2 of which were GS's~my all time favorite car.
PACKARD STILL THE FINEST AMERICAN AUTOMOBILE IN HISTORY AND A WAR WINNER P-51 MUSTANG
BUILT BY PACKARD
GET OVER YOUR SELF FOOL
@@infodrivetv stop this! It's (probably) silly!
Ridiculous. These ar in no way "silly" cars. and I've seen all of them time and time again.
Agree !, All Great,,,,,,Young uns Don’t Know ….
Click bait. I bailed.
Exactly! How is a 1964 Mustang silly? And unless you’re from another planet, you’ve heard of the 1964 (actually 1964 1/2) mustang. Not only that. But it’s obvious that AI wrote this based on the formal wording.
I did too! I hate these kind of clik bate vidios that ridicule cars I love in it's title, but end up praising them in the video!!??
Bellísimos autos !!!
YOU NEVER EXPLAINED WHY THESE CATRS ARE SILLY.
That's because they're not. I saw the Oldsmobile and the Corvette and knew this was just clickbait.
@@jamesmcinnis208i also think AI wrote this. It’s soulless.
@@dmandman9 Soulless, and backasswards. I never made it to the 2-minute mark, but seeing the Oldsmobile and Corvette was enough. Both are beautiful cars.
The title of your video is completely off base from what the video shows and is about. And I really hate the AI generated Franken car picture on the watch this video display
The Packard Straight 8 had 9 main bearings not 5.
Whomever editted this I HOPE was fired! Where were the "silly cars?"
I agree Tom. I was born in 1935 and I owned a few of these so-called silly cars from the 50's. I could do my own engine replacing
almost all by myself, but now, no way. I miss the old days for sure.
@@normanwyatt8761 My Dad and I rebuilt the engines on a 1950 Chevy and a 1960 Dodge in our carport back in the day. Today I lift the hood of my car and don't know what I am looking at. Cars when I was a kid were works of art and I always looked forward to seeing the new cars when they came out. Today not so much, they all look alike and not at all stylish! Cadillacs used to be Cadillacs but today they are little overpriced, upgraded Toyotas.
When you gonna show something silly, stop clickbait just be honest!
I'm a car lover, so I'm a bit confused by the title of this video. Did you title the video to draw more people in or do you not know what you're talking about? Some of these cars are considered classics.
sick and tired of misleading video titles. Silly you say?
Whoever called those cars silly ,
Just don't know about real cars.
EXCELLENT
An excellent review of "50s cars ; but I do not understand the title of your Show . Many set new concepts and engineering while others showed extreme styling.
Silly?? I would love to have all of them.
You're showing a 1953 Chevrolet Corvette engine, talking about it being a 6 cylinder, yet you show what is obviously a V-8 engine. I can't watch any more. You have a great concept but did poorly in executing it.
CUBIC INCHES PLEASE
This wonderful collage of mid century cars is spoiled by the misinformation and by the addition of customized & altered examples. And worse yet, the AI narrator calls these milestone cars, “silly” and at one point, “bizarre”. Two words that better describe this video. Nice try, though.
Aside from thee low fuel economy and th osteentatious styling I don't see what was "Silly" about some of the greatest dcars of all time?
Something had to be positive about the 1960s and the cars were one of those things!
Thy were so KEWL!!
So tell me why these are the silliest cars
Why are these silly cars? The people producing this series of car videos have only a limited auto knowledge.
I remember seeing most of these cars live and affording to drive them was inexpensive since gas was 25 and 35 cents per gallon during the fifties and sixties. The cost to buy for some wasn't too difficult if you earned at least 2.00 to 3.00 dollars per hours if my memory serve me correct.
Didn't Corvette number one fall in a sinkhole? We'd better check that one out. We cannot depend on the publisher of this silly video
Once you get past the idiotic and misleading title, this is very enjoyable!
A corvette?
I don't know about the Corvette being silly, but it was a poor car, when word got out about how bad the 1953 corvette was. The last new 1953 corvette never sold until 1959. GM couldn't give them away.
Get rid of the AI !
With the 6 cylinder engine the 1953 Corvette was not much of a sports car. it was big heavy and Guttles.
GM didn't have time to develop their V8 before production. That's the reason for the BlueFlame 6.
@@richardmerriam7044 I knew guys that owned MG's they had a 4 cylinder, yet they were sporty. The problem with the Corvette was not the size of the engine it was the fact that the car was a tank!
Great cars terrible title for the video
Click bait. Nothing silly and I have seen them.
Not "silly" at all. Narration plus narrator is silly tho.....
All the transmissions delivered smooth power, all the designs innovative. Copy paste. Thumbs down.
who comes up with this crap? The 1964 Mustang was "silly'????? The video does not match the narration, for the 1953 Corvette it describes an in line 6 but shows a V8. this is a stupid waste of time.
Let's face it: DRIVE TV MAKES GARBAGE CONTENT! They don't seem to understand the English language. The titles never match the content. The content shows little insight. This stuff just isn't very good. Life is way too short to waste on this crap.
Just an opinion based to little or zero automotive knowlage.
If I watch it, I still consider, I can't stand Coupés that much and really hate Convertibles. You pay more for less car, for the well sortet crap. Sorry for my honesty. Bring back the urban Sedan... or Station Wagons nobody seems to care anymore.
Obviously this is a list made by someone who thinks tge cars made today are stylish. Most cars made today look very much alike unlike the actual styling of cars of tge 50s, 60s and 70s.