Why Can't Petrol Explode On Ships?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 19 чер 2024
  • Join our Exclusive Community over on Patreon: / casualnavigation
    Even though tankers carry thousands of tons of flammable fuel around the world, you don't hear of them exploding. Have you ever asked yourself why?
    If a car catches fire, it often results in a fireball. Why doesn't the same happen with ships?
    --------------JOIN OUR COMMUNITY---------------
    We have launched a new community of maritime enthusiasts over on Patreon.
    ★ / casualnavigation
    When you join, you will become part of an Exclusive Community, gain Early Access to our UA-cam videos*, receive Exclusive Content* and have influence over Community Videos*
    *Everyone becomes a part of our community, but additional rewards will depend on the tier you select.
    ---------------------WITH THANKS----------------------
    ★ Images used under license from Shutterstock.com
    Tanker - MaxWebb / Shutterstock.com
    World Map - Ekler / Shutterstock.com”
    ★ IMAGES
    Nitrogen Canisters - Jason Woodhead - CC-BY - creativecommons.org/licenses/...
    Nitrogen Tank - Andrechinn - CC-BY - creativecommons.org/licenses/...
    ★ Music & Sound Effects
    Music & Sounds Effects by Epidemic Sound (www.epidemicsound.com)
    ------------------------DISCLAIMER-------------------------
    All content on this channel is provided for entertainment purposes only. Although every effort has been made to ensure the content is accurate and up to date, it remains the responsibility of the viewer to determine its accuracy and validity. The content should never be used to substitute professional advice or education.
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 559

  • @baileywright1656
    @baileywright1656 4 роки тому +1687

    Learned something new this morning. I never thought of using the engine exhaust to get the CO2. I had just assumed they were using nitrogen.

    • @tolga1cool
      @tolga1cool 4 роки тому +33

      @joecugo wtf dude

    • @anthonyc4138
      @anthonyc4138 4 роки тому +2

      @joecugo lol

    • @anthonyc4138
      @anthonyc4138 4 роки тому +3

      @@tolga1cool what?

    • @baileywright1656
      @baileywright1656 4 роки тому +41

      @Jake Chen It isn't the fact that engines produce CO2 but the fact it can be re-purposed instead of being released to the environment :) Makes sense but sometimes the 'simple' option isn't the first one we think of, as in my case.

    • @julianreverse
      @julianreverse 4 роки тому +1

      @@berndknauer5211 What exatly has the free oxygen to to with your nitrogen production? :-D

  • @ohhi1134
    @ohhi1134 4 роки тому +916

    Human ingenuity never ceases to amaze me

    • @USSAnimeNCC-
      @USSAnimeNCC- 4 роки тому +26

      That why we conqure the world

    • @EternityWowStaff
      @EternityWowStaff 4 роки тому +40

      Too bad we are still killing each other instead of working together to maybe...let's say explore the space as a human race.

    • @siechamontillado
      @siechamontillado 4 роки тому +7

      Tell me Hoo-man, what is this thing you call 'love?'

    • @YagiChanDan
      @YagiChanDan 4 роки тому +22

      Never underestimate the persistence of stupidity.

    • @kinderboeken55
      @kinderboeken55 4 роки тому +5

      @@siechamontillado underrated comment

  • @Avionicx
    @Avionicx 4 роки тому +613

    I find it incredible that I don't have an interest in maritime study or whatever, and I can still enjoy these videos. You got me into learning about ships and how they worked, and sparked an interest in them. Keep up the awesome work!

    • @CasualNavigation
      @CasualNavigation  4 роки тому +45

      Thank Avionic7779x. It's great to hear you are enjoying the videos

    • @cr4zyj4ck
      @cr4zyj4ck 4 роки тому +3

      Haha, you didn't have an interest in ships, but now you do!

    • @Skwerll
      @Skwerll 4 роки тому +7

      The UA-cam algorithm works in mysterious ways

    • @bautistamercader4737
      @bautistamercader4737 3 роки тому +1

      @@Skwerll neural networks, three of them actually

    • @bautistamercader4737
      @bautistamercader4737 3 роки тому

      @@Skwerll I lookloke the grindy person which wants every body to use the right terminology.

  • @paulinbrooklyn
    @paulinbrooklyn 4 роки тому +593

    Five minutes ago, I hadn’t ever considered the issue other than the analogous one of fuel tankers on the highways and roads where I believe at least in the US, safety has been improved over time through requirements of triple walled tanks and I’m sure inspection, valve and service life requirements. But, getting back to ships, your video perfectly laid out the problem and the solution (including both the scientific and economic aspects thereof). Well done!

  • @ChrisGamingGR
    @ChrisGamingGR 3 роки тому +87

    I am an actual seafarer in tankers and this video helped me to better understand how the system works even simplified.. Wish it had other elements like PV V/V or PV Breaker.. This channel is gold! Also the sewage treatment helped me understand better..

  • @vaporisedair4919
    @vaporisedair4919 4 роки тому +35

    Nitrogen is actually used in liquefied gas carriers containing things such as LNG, or LPG. The nitrogen is generated by on board generators (separating from the outside air) but it’s only used for maintenance and during cargo operations, normally the tanks are slightly pressurised so no air can come in anyway.
    CO2 and water will freeze under the operating conditions of these carriers.

  • @Fjottle
    @Fjottle 4 роки тому +37

    I'm currently studying to become a deck officer so these videos are golden.

  • @ritvikvaishnav3472
    @ritvikvaishnav3472 4 роки тому +293

    It vexes me to see such a talented and wonderful creator like yourself have so little subscribers. I hope you make it big.

    • @CasualNavigation
      @CasualNavigation  4 роки тому +49

      Thanks Ritvik. I just do it for enjoyment anyway, but it's always nice to hear the content is enjoyed.

    • @alexismandelias
      @alexismandelias 4 роки тому +15

      It's not the quality, it's the topic. Not many people enjoy this kind of content, so you get low view count. Not many people watch because of food quality. Some (inducing me) do however watch not because of an interest in the subject but, conversely, the good quality makes me interested

    • @paddor
      @paddor 4 роки тому +6

      Didn’t check the # of his subscribers, but yeah, I love his content. Super talented! So well explained and animated. Cheers

  • @emperorkarlfranzprinceofal1465
    @emperorkarlfranzprinceofal1465 4 роки тому +75

    somehow your channel is such a comfy place despite the fact that the sea terrifies me like hell

  • @jayswarrow1196
    @jayswarrow1196 4 роки тому +25

    I once had that experience on a picnic, when friend performed a "magic trick" for me: he filled the generator tank to the top with the canister, light a match, took a swing with his hat over the tank (to draw vapors away) and threw the match right into the filler.
    I was blown away with the physics on that matter.

    • @dtibor5903
      @dtibor5903 2 роки тому +8

      Actually pure oxygen is more dangerous than most fuels. Pure oxygen can set on fire things that are normally are not flammable.

    • @LiborTinka
      @LiborTinka 2 роки тому +1

      @@dtibor5903 in that case the thing set in fire becomes the fuel

    • @afoxwithahat7846
      @afoxwithahat7846 2 роки тому +1

      @@LiborTinka for example, your skin.
      Usually you'd get burned instead of burning, but if you touch liquid Oxygen you're screwed.

    • @gerry5712
      @gerry5712 Рік тому +2

      @@afoxwithahat7846 The burn you'd get from touching liquid oxygen would be a very severe form of frostbite due to the extreme cold. Now if your clothing got saturated with liquid oxygen and encountered a spark that could cause a flash fire.

  • @xaiano794
    @xaiano794 4 роки тому +251

    2:05 - Spain are responsible for all fuel fires apparently.

    • @jimtaylor294
      @jimtaylor294 4 роки тому +22

      I knew it!!

    • @8vantor8
      @8vantor8 4 роки тому +17

      those bastards, WE GOT TA DO SOMETHING ABOUT EM

    • @peterson7082
      @peterson7082 4 роки тому +39

      Because no one ever expects them, they get away with it.

    • @Imoaninyourroomeverynight
      @Imoaninyourroomeverynight 4 роки тому +15

      So that's what happened to the USS Maine

    • @Mr-Ad-196
      @Mr-Ad-196 4 роки тому +20

      @@peterson7082 no one expect the Spanish inquisition hueheueheheh.

  • @sirBrouwer
    @sirBrouwer 4 роки тому +49

    I work in the petroleum industry and here the have a other alternative. make sure the tank is completely full with the product it self. then there cant get any oxygen in to it
    what you are talking about is here only used if a tank has to be made empty. then they do add nitrogen.

    • @CasualNavigation
      @CasualNavigation  4 роки тому +28

      Similar on ships. When the tank is full it is fine. Loading and discharging are the highest risk times

    • @sirBrouwer
      @sirBrouwer 4 роки тому +5

      @@CasualNavigation that i am aware of. here the biggest risk is the friction you get during the discharging.

    • @eastcorkcheeses6448
      @eastcorkcheeses6448 4 роки тому

      But the tank has to be emptied some stage , an oil tank that's permanently full ,and never emptied is worse than having no oil ,because you have to maintain the tank ,and theres a risk of leaking or fire ...

    • @sirBrouwer
      @sirBrouwer 4 роки тому

      @@eastcorkcheeses6448 they do empty the tanks for maintenance. that's with in a planning. but all the other time it is best to keep it full and on pressure. on land it's easy you can raise or lower the top of the tank that way it is always full with in the space used.

    • @bas6983
      @bas6983 4 роки тому +2

      Sorry to interfere. You can’t (are not allowed) to fill a shipstank upto 100%. 98% is the max. A floating roof system is very impractical. During the transfer the liquid is agitated and due to this biggest risk of static discharge is during the transfer and thats why you need to be fully inerted constantly at an oil tanker.
      During maintenance periods the tanks will be cleaned and gasfreed so safe acces is possible.

  • @tkvds
    @tkvds 4 роки тому +54

    Very interesting video, I hope it EXPLODES with views and likes!

    • @CasualNavigation
      @CasualNavigation  4 роки тому +8

      Thanks Tom. I enjoy making them regardless, but it's nice knowing people enjoy watching too

  • @mateuszmattias
    @mateuszmattias 2 роки тому +7

    In the late 70s and early 80s two sister ships the Berge Istra and the Berge Vanga both dissapeared within a few years. As far as I remember they carried iron ore AND crude oil on different occasions (a practice not in use anymore) and somehow residue from the oil caused gas to build up whereas at some point the iron content in the ore may have caused sparks.
    None of the ships have ever been found (they dissapeared on the high oceans at places thousands of feet deep, in an era long before GPS navigation), but it was assumed they exploded and sank with no survivors.

  • @black_jackledemon6298
    @black_jackledemon6298 4 роки тому +10

    As a welder and machinist we use these principles often when repairing tanks for various fuels, fluids or repurposing tanks (usually propane tanks) on a regular bases.
    Diesel and Hydraulic tanks are the least dangerous as they are closer on the scale to oil so flammable but not necessarily explosive.
    A flexible metal hose from the exhaust of a welding rig [truck] works more than well enough to be safe on those. And frankly convenient as you can see it come out the top most if the time as an indication it's full.
    Other fuels considered explosive we drain all of it which makes it more dangerous but pump in generous amounts of Argon because as a gas it's "heavy" so fills like something on the order of invisible water..
    No oxygen sources....no fire....no explosion.
    Still a dangerous way to make a living but somebody has to do it. 🤷‍♂️
    Excellent video explaintion for the general public so I hit the 👍 for you.

    • @julianbrelsford
      @julianbrelsford 2 роки тому +2

      Actual "explosives" may contain enough oxygen to combust without needing contact with an external source of oxygen - dynamite, gunpowder, etc

  • @vanceb1
    @vanceb1 2 роки тому +3

    I'm retired from the USCG and was a Marine Inspector for about 20 years. I was inspecting a sport fishing boat in San Pedro once and noticed some planking on the bow was a different color than the wood it was adjacent to. I asked the owner about it. He laughed and said it was from the Sansinena II explosion. When the ship blew up a valve flew through the air about a mile and landed smack on the bow of this guy's boat. It went right through the boat which then immediately sank. That must have been a heck of an explosion.

  • @greatcanadianmoose3965
    @greatcanadianmoose3965 4 роки тому +26

    Very good, the title is very descriptive, as soon as I saw the title, I knew how it worked. But your narration and visuals are absolutely stunning! Keep it up!

    • @CasualNavigation
      @CasualNavigation  4 роки тому +1

      Thanks Great Canadian Moose. Glad you enjoyed it

  • @drakeivy8
    @drakeivy8 4 роки тому +27

    Youre telling me i have to wait 2 WEEKS for another video?!?

  • @mariebcfhs9491
    @mariebcfhs9491 4 роки тому

    I love your videos, as a fellow mariner (used to) I can say that your knowledge is amazing, thank you for sharing with us!

  • @afh7689
    @afh7689 4 роки тому +2

    Clear and concise explanation and in a video that's not too long. Good job! 👍

  • @guillaumeromain6694
    @guillaumeromain6694 4 роки тому +6

    You'll never fail to amaze me by the quality of your videos. Content and delivery. Very pleasant to watch. Thank you! You definitely deserve a ten fold increase in subscribers

    • @CasualNavigation
      @CasualNavigation  4 роки тому +1

      Thanks Guillaume. Glad you are enjoying the content.

  • @odehrizkallah395
    @odehrizkallah395 4 роки тому +3

    good to have you back from your break, missed these vids

  • @midgetarmy1921
    @midgetarmy1921 4 роки тому +7

    Huh, random recommendation, and I was pleased.

  • @nadlisse9055
    @nadlisse9055 4 роки тому +4

    Casual Navigation animation his ship explosions.
    Ship: **Literally Dissapears**

  • @gasser5001
    @gasser5001 Рік тому +1

    Nothing like the thrill of learning something new on a Sunday morning.

  • @ferhatdoganolmez1423
    @ferhatdoganolmez1423 2 роки тому

    This channel is an one of the best sources that we seafarer uses most and also they make the topics easy to understand and fun.I am really grateful for this.

  • @coleedson5439
    @coleedson5439 4 роки тому +2

    Wooo new CN video
    Keep up the great work man

  • @hawky4397
    @hawky4397 4 роки тому +42

    The wendover productions of the seven seas

    • @peter_smyth
      @peter_smyth 4 роки тому +4

      What about a spin-off channel; half as deep?

  • @Naganix
    @Naganix Рік тому

    I've learned so much about ships from you channel, apreciate you man!

  • @Tuulos
    @Tuulos 3 роки тому +6

    Cars actually don't explode all that violently, the damage done by the explosion is surprisingly minor. The fire does most of the damage.

  • @arrowghost
    @arrowghost Рік тому +1

    As I watched Mythbusters the TV series, there's the thing called the Fire Triangle, and when sometimes they don't ignite, the Mythbusters need to adjust the gas ratio called Stoichiometry, like you said, between too lean & too rich.

  • @MervynPartin
    @MervynPartin 3 роки тому +13

    It might be worth pointing out that the inert gas, being a product of combustion is still mostly Nitrogen which is pretty much unchanged apart from small quantities of oxides produced. The combustion process of the Hydrocarbon fuel turns most of the oxygen into Carbon Dioxide and water vapour.
    During the scrubbing process, some of the Carbon Dioxide dissolves in the scrubbing tower so the percentage of Nitrogen in the inert gas becomes even higher- around 83-84%.with about 16%.
    There is always some residual oxygen- around 3%.
    I have not come across any installations using the main engine as a source of inert gas, these generally being shut down in port, but the gas being derived either from the flue gas of a boiler or a separate oil-fired inert gas generator.

    • @johnsnow9224
      @johnsnow9224 2 роки тому

      Thanks for the explanation, i was confused after watching this video whether Nitrogen is the most part of inert gas or Co2..i had a doubt so if we are not using a scrubber tower how much percentage of Nitrogen will be there in the exhaust of boiler? Thanks

  • @TheGrimsock
    @TheGrimsock 3 роки тому

    I know nothing about ships, and was not particularly interested in them until coming across this channel. Facinating stuff! Liked and subbed

  • @SMX815
    @SMX815 2 роки тому

    Another great video & love your research 😊👍

  • @adamwarren775
    @adamwarren775 3 роки тому +5

    3:49 Nuclear reactors release minimal to no CO2. The clouds they produce is from water used for cooling/turbines that has been treated.

    • @mtsranger
      @mtsranger 3 роки тому +3

      I think those are coal power plants.

    • @afoxwithahat7846
      @afoxwithahat7846 2 роки тому

      Those are cooling towers, they can be used in any system/powerplant that produces heat.

  • @99Ukkeli
    @99Ukkeli 4 роки тому +1

    I can look at all of these videos with a new perspective now as I'm working in the harbour of a Finnish oil refinery and I'm dealing with these ships every day at work✌🏼

  • @johnsawyer2516
    @johnsawyer2516 Рік тому +1

    All maritime technology explained in ways everyone can understand. Excellent channel.

  • @brendanpospischil3871
    @brendanpospischil3871 4 роки тому +1

    These videos are informative and great for relaxing before sleep.

  • @mitsvanmitsvanio6106
    @mitsvanmitsvanio6106 4 роки тому +2

    At last a channel having content for my job, I am a Fourth Mate. Very good representation of IG, one thing though your Tanker misses the BRAVO flag.

  • @Thegreenpig22
    @Thegreenpig22 3 роки тому

    Was watching a documentary about ferries and I felt like I knew a lot of things they were talking about because of watching your channel! 😁

  • @hernaninobleza3721
    @hernaninobleza3721 3 роки тому +1

    Ex seafarer here. Most oil tankers I know use exhaust gas from the boiler instead of the exhaust from the diesel engine. The diesel engine can not produce enough inert gas at a rate needed during cargo discharging operation. Also, it would be difficult to bring down the residual O2 content of the exhaust from a diesel engine to a level that is considered safe (

  • @vickyvonstein2331
    @vickyvonstein2331 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you Henry.

  • @cjhoyle
    @cjhoyle 4 роки тому +1

    Very very interesting! Thanks for sharing :)

  • @rijuviswanath1725
    @rijuviswanath1725 4 роки тому +2

    Very informative

  • @ikon8275
    @ikon8275 4 роки тому

    This is such a fascinating channel!

  • @blumac9801
    @blumac9801 4 роки тому

    Never thought I wanted this question answered

  • @rodrigues709
    @rodrigues709 3 роки тому

    Great explaining,
    Help us to learn more about oil tankers, because I like pretty much!

  • @siechamontillado
    @siechamontillado 4 роки тому +3

    Great video, though you forget what caused the explosion in the 1970's Los Angeles explosion, in the first place, was the infamous 'Disco Inferno.' Thank goodness disco is dead, saving many lives in the process.

  • @dirtypure2023
    @dirtypure2023 3 роки тому

    Your animations are really good. Big fan.

  • @billmead5052
    @billmead5052 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks for another interesting video!

  • @castle5892
    @castle5892 3 роки тому

    Great video, keep going!

  • @JavierCR25
    @JavierCR25 4 роки тому

    Wow!!! This is why I love this channel

  • @shubhamupman7260
    @shubhamupman7260 2 роки тому

    Great vid!!

  • @bieresnavigationettheories5846
    @bieresnavigationettheories5846 4 роки тому

    The ships conceptor are very clever! Just like your videos! Thank you for your work mate!

  • @serviotulio22
    @serviotulio22 2 роки тому

    excellent work, congratulations

  • @diggidong470
    @diggidong470 4 роки тому

    The gas can happily bubble through 🤣🤣 your speaking voice illustrated that very well!

  • @SimpleYev
    @SimpleYev 3 роки тому

    Great stuff! Thank you! =)

  • @andrewandrew6376
    @andrewandrew6376 3 роки тому

    Amazing work!

  • @StripeTheFerret
    @StripeTheFerret 2 роки тому

    I love your channel. Keep it up

  • @morphuk1
    @morphuk1 3 роки тому

    It's not something I've ever thought of. However, I found the video fascinating!

  • @CloroxBleach-ms7eo
    @CloroxBleach-ms7eo 4 роки тому +4

    I have never sailed in my live yet I watch your channel religiously lol

  • @svxnger
    @svxnger 3 роки тому +4

    That was the weirdest way someone has ever introduced a mathematical graph to me

  • @rahulbodh4706
    @rahulbodh4706 4 роки тому

    Your videos has been a great help for upcoming marine students.
    It's just request to u if you can do something on ANCHORING ,SEABED, MOORINGS.
    THANKS
    CHEERS
    KE

  • @far06c
    @far06c Рік тому

    Great video!!

  • @jonathandevries2828
    @jonathandevries2828 4 роки тому +1

    thanks commented, liked and subscribed!

  • @JeffreyHeydenKaye
    @JeffreyHeydenKaye Рік тому

    Love the explosion animations

  • @whatthehellcarrot2801
    @whatthehellcarrot2801 Рік тому +2

    This is very useful

  • @redroris4906
    @redroris4906 3 роки тому

    So helpful videos 👍

  • @vittoriovettraino2077
    @vittoriovettraino2077 4 роки тому +1

    Love you're videos, help me allot to understand nautical science. Can you possibly do a video on a tutorial of the Sextant? Or possibly the use of the nautical almanac, and example of use?

  • @galo7367
    @galo7367 Рік тому

    I really really look forward for a video for the inert gas system, please make one!!

  • @bobbobic8403
    @bobbobic8403 3 роки тому

    Keep up great work 😎😎

  • @jsveiga
    @jsveiga 4 роки тому

    Since you asked, 1991, I was camping at Ilhabela, Brazil, when a tanker (Alina P) exploded right in front of us. All the sky turned orange, and the thunder seemed endless. Quite the fireworks for the end of the year. A spark from the anchor chain started it. Only one casualty.

  • @b.s.3645
    @b.s.3645 Рік тому

    Literally a perfect video!

  • @denisivanov4610
    @denisivanov4610 2 роки тому

    As an engineer on board of ships, everything said is correct, but we are not using exhaust from Main Engine, or Auxiliary engines (generators), there are 2 options. One of them being Fired Steam boilers (using of their exhaust gases) and IGG (inert gas generator)

  • @jamieh9733
    @jamieh9733 2 роки тому

    Ok I've been watching a lot of sci shows just about every mainstream one there is but this is just as good if not a better channel with a very low following I couldn't imagine the videos that this creator could make with a higher volume of subscribers

  • @JAVTROOPER
    @JAVTROOPER 3 роки тому

    100% subscribing this channel

  •  4 роки тому

    Enjoyable presentation

  • @NomenNescio99
    @NomenNescio99 4 роки тому +8

    The narrators accent makes the content of these videos at least twice as interesting to watch.

  • @jjwwqq
    @jjwwqq 2 роки тому

    Very interesting.

  • @mirrorblue100
    @mirrorblue100 2 роки тому +2

    Some military aircraft have used a similar system in their fuel tanks to lessen explosive risks in combat.

  • @Agseight
    @Agseight 4 роки тому

    Nice. Good man. Please make also Gmdss videos. Thanks

  • @decdeclanlan
    @decdeclanlan 4 роки тому

    this video is great!
    Only nitpick would be that you should maybe think about using some more contrasting colours on something like the flammability graph.

    • @CasualNavigation
      @CasualNavigation  4 роки тому +1

      Thanks Declan. I always welcome constructive criticism.

  • @sofianossaltzidis3401
    @sofianossaltzidis3401 3 роки тому

    naval engineer here. This video is generally accurate but a few notes: the CO2 usd to turn the atmoshere inside the tanks into non flammable actually comes from the boilers not the actual main engine.We engineers have to constantly kee an eye on the ratio of fuel-air to maintain a healthy level of oxygen well bellow 8% which is the safety limit(usually kept bellow 5%).The exhaust gas from the engine cant be used because that way the only way to produce inert gas would be at the times the ship is actually moving which is not the case. The steam produced by the boilers feeds into the cargo pumps abd their exhaust gas to neutralize the atmosphere inside the tanks. Great video however and great channel

  • @oasist5969
    @oasist5969 4 роки тому

    Yeah, the inner gas is filling to the cargo oil tanks, such as the diesel engine exhaust gas or the N2 gas.

  • @edwardfoster7414
    @edwardfoster7414 3 роки тому +1

    Great video, presumably if the tank was full and there was no space for oxygen to mix with vapours that would also stop an explosion.

  • @anoimo9013
    @anoimo9013 2 роки тому

    nice explanation. just a detail is that engine exhaust is mostly nitrogen

  • @iamchrollo425
    @iamchrollo425 4 роки тому +4

    could you do some videos about marine diesel engines in upcoming weeks... would be really helpfull

  • @TCPUDPATM
    @TCPUDPATM 2 роки тому

    I like how the engine is a fancy V10.

  • @rafaellima6383
    @rafaellima6383 2 роки тому

    0:39 lol anyone else notice the shockwave knock over the Hollywood sign and trees?

  • @thothtahuti5509
    @thothtahuti5509 2 роки тому

    Thanks

  • @kkpdk
    @kkpdk 3 роки тому

    The last time, it started with a call from the support department. They wanted to know if I had a backdoor tool that could dump the memory from a particular industrial controller without turning it on, because this particular controller had been extracted from Panam Serena, a chemical tanker that had exploded in Porto Torres. Sadly it turned out that our controller had lost power 10 minutes before the bang, so we didn't have sensor data for them, but that also told them something.

  • @MichChief
    @MichChief 2 роки тому

    The Inert Gas Systems on tankships were originally designed and installed to prevent explosions during a process called Crude Oil Washing. Crude Oil is typically heated for loading aboard a tankship. After a lengthy voyage, the crude oil cools and this leaves a thick film on "walls" and "bottoms" of the cargo tank after discharging at the terminal. Owners and charterers realized this was lost profit (consider the vast surface area of these cargo tanks). Machinery was developed and a practice began to heat some of the cargo and "wash down" the tank surfaces with heated crude to remove the film of oil. The machinery was similar to a giant lawn sprinkler that sprayed in a spherical pattern. In the early days, crew dropped the "sprinklers" on long hoses, but eventually fixed systems were installed. So, how does this relate to Inert Gas Systems? Hot, sprayed oil in an almost empty oil tank with a rich oxygen atmosphere combined with a static electrical charge from the movement of the oil started causing explosions. Several vessels suffered casualties before the mystery was solved when the electrical charge was observed in shore side cargo tank mock - up (or so the story goes). Owners and operators not wanting to lose the profit from the washing operations looked the engineers to solve and the Inert Gas System was created. A video on the process of Crude Oil Washing could be informative and entertaining.
    Also, most diesel powered tankers will shut down their Main Engine in port. Very often a small Inert Gas Generator is installed (think a small boiler) and it's flue gas is scrubbed and pumped to the cargo tanks.

  • @ahhchoo8488
    @ahhchoo8488 3 роки тому

    Incredibly clever.

  • @thehandlesticks66
    @thehandlesticks66 3 роки тому

    Brilliant

  • @Armadauzbekistan
    @Armadauzbekistan 4 роки тому +34

    Meanwhile Iran: Excuse me?

  • @thequesomanishere
    @thequesomanishere 4 роки тому +1

    Using millions of small explosions to prevent a massive one. Incredible.

  • @LumadSugboanon1610
    @LumadSugboanon1610 4 роки тому +1

    The last time i heard a tanker explode is the collision of MT Vector and MV Doña Paz

    • @janicesullivan8942
      @janicesullivan8942 4 роки тому

      Wasn’t the Dona Paz a passenger ferry? Those poor passengers never had a chance.

  • @CuoreSportivo
    @CuoreSportivo 4 роки тому

    everyone from istanbul remebers the 1979 independenta explosion. it was in the middle of the bosphorus, shattered every glass in the town. massive accident.

  • @HesJustSteven
    @HesJustSteven 4 роки тому

    I love your videos, can you please do a video on the Halifax Explosion in 1917?

  • @ksavierkrajewski716
    @ksavierkrajewski716 4 роки тому +2

    I watched all your videos