A Look at ‘The Proof’

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 28 лис 2024

КОМЕНТАРІ • 4

  • @chriscockrell9495
    @chriscockrell9495 2 роки тому

    The beautiful part of freedom is that you can believe dumb stuff and make poor choices. If those aren’t things you are okay with, like allowing flat earthers, you are not for freedom, you are for imposing your beliefs and that is what you believe is freedom.

  • @bornfree3124
    @bornfree3124 2 роки тому +2

    Seems as when a public servant makes $$ off finding people guilty would be a conflict of interest, especially when the cop cites or arrest you and the judge finds you guilty, then they all get a percentage of the fines and court costs you are obligated and ordered to pay, thats without the exception of the bonds issued on the case.

  • @josephsmyth832
    @josephsmyth832 2 роки тому

    There’s a difference between an artificial and natural person. What is being used as positive law is the social sciences that involves game theory. Natural law involves natural philosophy in relation to Aristotle. It requires the intellectual virtues and nothing to do with logical fallacies. If truth and justice which are virtues aren’t sought than all we have is nihilism.

  • @josephsmyth832
    @josephsmyth832 2 роки тому

    Probabilities have to do with the social sciences and game theory