Thank you GG for doing this difficult reading. It’s reassuring to know that she may not have committed this crime. I’ve struggled from the beginning to believe that she did. It just didn’t feel right.
Doctors maybe not against her BUT DOCTORS PROTECT THEIR OWN before minions would be considered.some families were outraged against her..think she was fall guy or nature not used to telling fo to ppl who laid blame at her door
Thanks for that insightful reading. This story is so full of archetypal energy and mythological themes that you could use it as a case study in Jungian psychoanalytical theory. Collective psychosis in action.
It is interesting that you referred to these incidences as excess deaths. We have been seeing this recently across all age ranges and an increase in infant mortality would be in accordance with this. Finding a scapegoat to plant the responsibility for this on, would be very convenient and wouldn't threaten the profit margins of certain medical interventions.
so , so sorry for the loss of your friend , thank you so much , more people are asking if this lady did this or not , i'll be sending love to all innocent people involved , thanks so much , linda ❤
Thank you GG for going down this rabbit hole given your loss. I have ( still do) work in the area LL worked in and previous to these events worked in one of her neonatal training hsps ( toxic environment does not even begin to describe it). Upon hearing of this case, I ‘knew’ she was a convenient patsy and questioned her defence counsels inability to grasp the fundamentals of a ward and its working practices. Any event which happens, working shift, allocated staff and their assignments are pulled. The gender, prematurity, gestational ages and seasons of birth are investigated ( generally more boys died in neonatal period). But then the legal profession is loathed to question the narrative of the hypocratic based professional. Just look to the Bolam test which is a legal standard devised by doctors for doctors and policed by doctors. What other profession allows this? Thank goodness for David Davies because he is like a Rottweiler.
According to a podcast (Was There Ever a Crime), the Countess of Chester hosp was the filthiest place imaginable with sewerage coming into sinks, weekly plumbing issues etc when Lucy Letby worked there. Killer bugs on the loose.
During the summer, I listened to a programme detailing the case against LL. For every baby's death they put on her I could think of another reason for them, from my 14 years experience in neonatal. Then I wondered I'm a mere nurse not a doctor and I could give other reasons for these babies deaths and I could pick holes in the prosecution's case, so why couldn't her defence team do that? I think she is more than a scapegoat, I think she's been let down by people she put her trust in. Stephen King wrote a novel The Shawshank Redemption and people asked him why he had wrote something different to his usual horror genre. His rely was did people not think it a horror story to be sentenced to life imprisonment for a crime you didn't commit?
Is it possible that being a nurse has given you hands on experience, dealing with doctors and consultants, and this has had an effect on how you analyse all the information? You know that they will deform reality, to avoid acknowledging their mishaps, errors, lack of understanding, etc, etc. Whereas for the vast majority of us, doctors are highly respectable members of society and their word/opinion should be given tremendous weight.
@robinhood4640 Do you think I'm biased being a nurse who is supporting another nurse? I wouldn't say that's the case but I know the way things work in the NHS. Doctors will hang a nurse to save their own skins and doctors will always support doctors. Nurses don't always necessarily support nurses, there are plenty of nurses who will side with doctors and hang other nurses there's a lot of things in this case that don't add up to me. My experience means that I see things in a different light that maybe other people wouldn't see which raises questions for me that others wouldn't think to ask. There are other things that are being used to damn LL that I don't draw the same conclusion from eg she was on the shifts when these babies died so she killed them. I say no she worked full time which for a nurse is 37.5hrs a week. When you do twelve HR shifts the pattern is usually 4 shifts one week, 3 shifts the next. LL did extra shifts on top of her full time hrs so there were very likely weeks she was working more than 48hrs. Once you go over that 48hrs and things go wrong you are on your own, because your Trust and union will not stand by you. You know the rules and you broke them so you are on your own. Working time directive allows us to work up to 48hrs a week. If LL worked over that she was very foolish and left herself open. It also meant the likelihood of her being on shift when these babies died was quite high. The more hours you work the more likely it is you are on shift when these things happen. That's my counter arguement to her killing these babies because she was on shift when the babies died. It is clear the unit was short staffed which is why she was doing extra shifts. What I can't understand is why the unit wasn't closed to outside admissions and why they weren't transferring babies to other units when they were over their capacity ie funded beds? Why were they not transferring the sicker babies to another unit even if it was far away, in the interests of patient safety? Who was managing this unit and making the decisions to keep admitting babies that they safely could not care for? I worked in a unit that experienced a shortness of staff and our unit closed to outside admissions IE admissions from other neonatal units and we transferred sicker babies out even though it meant parents had to travel a much longer distance to see their baby, in the interests of patient safety. I know units that become short staffed and they reduce their number of beds depending on staffing numbers and level of care the babies need. I don't understand why this unit wasn't doing any of this and if LL was working over 48hrs a week, she made herself the perfect scapegoat for someone else's failings. Yes I think this case needs looked at again in a much wider context as in how this unit was being managed, who was making the decisions and why did they make the decisions they made. Also who knew what and when was it decided to blame LL and build a case against her? My own experience tells me there are a lot of unasked and unanswered questions here.
@@SanchaHaskins-hl6ng I would be more inclined to say you lack a bias, than you have one. What i am trying to say is, you aren't having the wool pulled over your eyes, because they are doctors, whereas the vast majority of society is. So those who haven't had experience with doctors have a bias against the non doctors, but you don't.
Thank you eventually doing Lucy, it all feels so wrong. All evidence circumstantial she's been denied appeal for no reason. Yes I have been nagging on every reading to cover Lucy, strong feeling of injustice. ! BTW it's pronounced as 'jacky' but spelt jacqui ( jacqueline).
Thank you Jacqueline… I get frustrated when I look to our justice system ( I studied law at uni also) and angry because I deeply know that branch of nursing.
Well the notes she written? Plus the drip bags were contaminated not circumstantial fact I think. If LL is Innocent, she should be freed do they go to the Lab technicians.
Ever since the verdict on Lucy, I have had a gut feeling that something here is very wrong. I call on Archangel Raguel (justice) to rebalance the energy and correct the outcome. Bless the little babies and their parents.🙏🙏🙏
thank you so much for this , i'd never have thought it was this bad , Black Belt barrister on YT , and others have said similar things , thanks so much , xxxx
There was a documentary about it a few months back and she was trusted by some of he colleagues as a great nurse, also a top neo- natal doctor's written testament about his knowledge of decades into the fragile nature of these very prem infants was not even read out in court
My dad died of a heart attack in the late 80s and his body was taken to that hospital. The day after the police rang me to tell me his body had gone missing . after a couple of days It turned out an undertaker had collected his body but the hospital hadnt made anÿ record of it
Remember they give jabs to babies now without consent were they testing new drugs etc and pinned the blame on a young lady who is not able to defend herself!? This whole thing completely stinks.😡
i'm so glad he did this reading , i had no idea it was like this , BlackBeltBarrister on YT and a few others have touched upon it , i hope she is freed asap 😕
Im so sorry to hear your story and totally understand." Video suggestion" Do we live on a prison planet? are there other planets like Earth that is a utopa?
I would love to see LL walk free. Someone contaminated the bags of saline with Insulin. I seem to remember. (I’m not a nurse. Then there were the guilty conscience notes admitting these things. I never heard her say “ I didn’t do any of this” I would have answered every question with I didn’t murder any babies. Not stand there being accused. She was her own worst enemy.
I have worked as a neonatal nurse for 14 yes and I can tell you it is very difficult to inject insulin into a baby's IV fluids without someone realising very quickly that something untoward is happening with the insulin. Medicines are more tightly controlled in Neonates and children's wards than adults. It is not as easy to contaminate fluid bags as it would be in adults. Why did that baby have high levels of insulin in its blood. We don't normally do insulin levels in Neonates. The only time I have known blood insulin levels to come back on a baby was when we had a baby that had consistently low blood sugars even after being fed. We did bloods for a hypo pack and it came back there was a metabolic reason for the blood sugars being low and a certain milk was recommended. Once the baby was on the correct feeds the blood sugars corrected. As for the notes she wrote, when a baby becomes very ill or dies on your shift and you are the one looking after that baby, even if this happens on the shift after yours, you do a lot of soul searching. You ask yourself was there something you missed, was there something more you could have done, and you read through your notes looking for what you missed. I can understand her notes because that's how any nurse would feel if they were working shifts and babies they were looking after were dying on those shifts. My gut instinct and my experience tells me more was going on in this unit than we are being told. They were understaffed and kept taking sick babies even putting themselves over their funded beds. Why were they not transferring out sicker babies and closing the unit to babies being transferred from other hospitals? That's a management failing and that could have contributed to those babies deaths. I agree with people who say she's a scapegoat because I think she is and I also think she foolishly worked over the working time directive of 48 hrs and didn't have a legal leg to stand on, when things went wrong. She worked full-time and did overtime or bank shifts. There would have been weeks she was over her 48hrs. She was the most likely scapegoat because the likelihood of her being on duty when these babies died or became unwell was increased because of these extra shifts( bank or overtime)."
I'm thinking about the number of people who were treated inappropriately when sick with covid. Effective treatments were banned and withheld, end of life treatments were given instead. Has there similarly been some 'less than optimum' standard of care imposed regards babies?
Yes but she failed to put a tube that had dislodged from a babies nose whilst the doctor was actually in the room and he asked her why she had not checked consistently enough and replaced it. When you are overseeing prematures surely your checking every five minutes or so
She might not have replaced the NG tube because the baby was not needing fed at that time. I was a neonatal nurse for 14 years and I would have replaced a displaced NG tube closer to the time the baby was to be fed as it is very traumatic for the little ones. You could replace it before hand but chances are the baby will pull that one out too, so to minimise trauma leave it closer to the time of a feed. That's my rationale anyway. As for doctors they don't know everything and I have yet to see a doctor pass a NG tube in neonatal.
Also, no we don't check every 5 mins. Before you feed by NG you check the tube hasn't moved and you are checking stomach ph before feeding. That is sufficient. You don't even do obs every 5 mins, every HR if need be but very rarely more frequent than that even for the most ill and premature babies.
@@SanchaHaskins-hl6ng My nephew has just come out of a neonatal unit and so your comment about the baby pulling the tube out rang true for me. That's exactly what he was doing.
The only other time you would have an Orogastric tube in for reasons other than feeding would be if a baby was on CPAP to allow the air that would accumulate in the stomach to escape. Otherwise that air would press on the chest making breathing more difficult. That tube would have to be replaced quickly should the baby pull it out but if you have a baby that lively it may not be a good idea to continue with CPAP. In my unit it was practice to pass an Orogastric or Nasogastric tube before a chest x-ray. Do we know if the baby in question was on CPAP or needing a chest x-ray?
The expert that the prosecution relied on to convict her . Has now said he doesn't think his expert opinion was now wrong .plus as you said babys were still ending up dead when she was not even there . I mean there is a lot of this evidence that totally doesn't add up . I feel terrible for the familys but this conviction is not safe . I belive it was hospital pratices and lucy was scapegoat and it was a very very poorly run hospital poor management. This lucy was pressured and under resources made her job and many others were struggling. I think it was another post office tainted blood scandel
She guilty! There is an inquiry going on now. You obviously know absolutely nothing about the case but have made up your mind and read the cards accordingly. Unsubscribed
@@Piper_demi. The inquiry has been set up to find out why Letby was allowed to go on murdering premature babies. The consultants wanted her off the unit much months before she was finally taken off. If management had listened to them, several lives could have been saved. If you are not following the Thirlwall Inquiry, I recommend it for some absolutely jaw-dropping behaviour (like the Post Office, in fact). The transcripts of each day are on the website.
Yes, it's the Thirlwall inquiry, but it's not an inquiry into Letby's innocence or guilt. Letby was found guilty by a jury who, having considered the evidence, concluded that she murdered these babies. The inquiry is looking at the practices within the hospital that allowed this to happen. This is a quote from the Daily Telegraph on 29th October: "At the beginning of the inquiry Lady Justice Thirwall said *the issue of Letby’s guilt was not in dispute* and that the inquiry would not ‘set about reviewing convictions’. This means that the evidence they are using in the inquiry must be the same evidence that was presented in court. It's the evidence that found Lucy Letby guilty. But that is *the* problem, maryc - it's the evidence that was presented in court that some professionals have disputed and which has led to concerns that Letby may not be guilty.
Sorry for your loss. This reading we chose for to hopefully uncover the truth, as l personally believe, she's the scape goat. Thank you for this. 🤗
I've had a feeling deep down since this story first broke that Lucy is innocent. Thank you for this reading.
Thank you GG for doing this difficult reading. It’s reassuring to know that she may not have committed this crime. I’ve struggled from the beginning to believe that she did. It just didn’t feel right.
I think those doctors who were against her should be looked at
Doctors maybe not against her BUT DOCTORS PROTECT THEIR OWN before minions would be considered.some families were outraged against her..think she was fall guy or nature not used to telling fo to ppl who laid blame at her door
My friend daughter is a nurse, and her daughter said she couldn't have done it, and she was right not to stand there and be told guilty
Thanks for that insightful reading. This story is so full of archetypal energy and mythological themes that you could use it as a case study in Jungian psychoanalytical theory. Collective psychosis in action.
It is interesting that you referred to these incidences as excess deaths. We have been seeing this recently across all age ranges and an increase in infant mortality would be in accordance with this. Finding a scapegoat to plant the responsibility for this on, would be very convenient and wouldn't threaten the profit margins of certain medical interventions.
so , so sorry for the loss of your friend , thank you so much , more people are asking if this lady did this or not , i'll be sending love to all innocent people involved , thanks so much , linda ❤
Thank you GG for going down this rabbit hole given your loss. I have ( still do) work in the area LL worked in and previous to these events worked in one of her neonatal training hsps ( toxic environment does not even begin to describe it). Upon hearing of this case, I ‘knew’ she was a convenient patsy and questioned her defence counsels inability to grasp the fundamentals of a ward and its working practices. Any event which happens, working shift, allocated staff and their assignments are pulled. The gender, prematurity, gestational ages and seasons of birth are investigated ( generally more boys died in neonatal period). But then the legal profession is loathed to question the narrative of the hypocratic based professional. Just look to the Bolam test which is a legal standard devised by doctors for doctors and policed by doctors. What other profession allows this? Thank goodness for David Davies because he is like a Rottweiler.
According to a podcast (Was There Ever a Crime), the Countess of Chester hosp was the filthiest place imaginable with sewerage coming into sinks, weekly plumbing issues etc when Lucy Letby worked there. Killer bugs on the loose.
Janetstead@ that doesn’t even shock me. It should but doesn’t since pertaining issues are brushed under the carpet.
Good lord what a messed up world we live in 😮
During the summer, I listened to a programme detailing the case against LL. For every baby's death they put on her I could think of another reason for them, from my 14 years experience in neonatal. Then I wondered I'm a mere nurse not a doctor and I could give other reasons for these babies deaths and I could pick holes in the prosecution's case, so why couldn't her defence team do that? I think she is more than a scapegoat, I think she's been let down by people she put her trust in. Stephen King wrote a novel The Shawshank Redemption and people asked him why he had wrote something different to his usual horror genre. His rely was did people not think it a horror story to be sentenced to life imprisonment for a crime you didn't commit?
Is it possible that being a nurse has given you hands on experience, dealing with doctors and consultants, and this has had an effect on how you analyse all the information?
You know that they will deform reality, to avoid acknowledging their mishaps, errors, lack of understanding, etc, etc. Whereas for the vast majority of us, doctors are highly respectable members of society and their word/opinion should be given tremendous weight.
@robinhood4640 Do you think I'm biased being a nurse who is supporting another nurse? I wouldn't say that's the case but I know the way things work in the NHS. Doctors will hang a nurse to save their own skins and doctors will always support doctors. Nurses don't always necessarily support nurses, there are plenty of nurses who will side with doctors and hang other nurses there's a lot of things in this case that don't add up to me. My experience means that I see things in a different light that maybe other people wouldn't see which raises questions for me that others wouldn't think to ask. There are other things that are being used to damn LL that I don't draw the same conclusion from eg she was on the shifts when these babies died so she killed them. I say no she worked full time which for a nurse is 37.5hrs a week. When you do twelve HR shifts the pattern is usually 4 shifts one week, 3 shifts the next. LL did extra shifts on top of her full time hrs so there were very likely weeks she was working more than 48hrs. Once you go over that 48hrs and things go wrong you are on your own, because your Trust and union will not stand by you. You know the rules and you broke them so you are on your own. Working time directive allows us to work up to 48hrs a week. If LL worked over that she was very foolish and left herself open. It also meant the likelihood of her being on shift when these babies died was quite high. The more hours you work the more likely it is you are on shift when these things happen. That's my counter arguement to her killing these babies because she was on shift when the babies died. It is clear the unit was short staffed which is why she was doing extra shifts. What I can't understand is why the unit wasn't closed to outside admissions and why they weren't transferring babies to other units when they were over their capacity ie funded beds? Why were they not transferring the sicker babies to another unit even if it was far away, in the interests of patient safety? Who was managing this unit and making the decisions to keep admitting babies that they safely could not care for? I worked in a unit that experienced a shortness of staff and our unit closed to outside admissions IE admissions from other neonatal units and we transferred sicker babies out even though it meant parents had to travel a much longer distance to see their baby, in the interests of patient safety. I know units that become short staffed and they reduce their number of beds depending on staffing numbers and level of care the babies need. I don't understand why this unit wasn't doing any of this and if LL was working over 48hrs a week, she made herself the perfect scapegoat for someone else's failings. Yes I think this case needs looked at again in a much wider context as in how this unit was being managed, who was making the decisions and why did they make the decisions they made. Also who knew what and when was it decided to blame LL and build a case against her? My own experience tells me there are a lot of unasked and unanswered questions here.
@@SanchaHaskins-hl6ng I would be more inclined to say you lack a bias, than you have one.
What i am trying to say is, you aren't having the wool pulled over your eyes, because they are doctors, whereas the vast majority of society is. So those who haven't had experience with doctors have a bias against the non doctors, but you don't.
Sorry for your loss. This story took a wierd turn when the mainstream circus happened.
Thank you eventually doing Lucy, it all feels so wrong. All evidence circumstantial she's been denied appeal for no reason.
Yes I have been nagging on every reading to cover Lucy, strong feeling of injustice.
! BTW it's pronounced as 'jacky' but spelt jacqui ( jacqueline).
Thank you Jacqueline… I get frustrated when I look to our justice system ( I studied law at uni also) and angry because I deeply know that branch of nursing.
Well the notes she written? Plus the drip bags were contaminated not circumstantial fact I think. If LL is Innocent, she should be freed do they go to the Lab technicians.
@@Cruella-Devilleyou obviously havent listened to this reading yet. Also lawyers are saying evidence was circumstantial.
Tip of the iceberg, harvesting.
strange Starmer shows up - he is a barrister, could be in the know... excellent reading, thank you - off to watch the Cattilicks now
Am off to see the catty licks too
Ever since the verdict on Lucy, I have had a gut feeling that something here is very wrong. I call on Archangel Raguel (justice) to rebalance the energy and correct the outcome. Bless the little babies and their parents.🙏🙏🙏
I feel they used her as a scapegoat
thank you so much for this , i'd never have thought it was this bad , Black Belt barrister on YT , and others have said similar things , thanks so much , xxxx
Sonia Poulton bringing this to light amongst others. Lots of information on her UA-cam.
There was a documentary about it a few months back and she was trusted by some of he colleagues as a great nurse, also a top neo- natal doctor's written testament about his knowledge of decades into the fragile nature of these very prem infants was not even read out in court
Our justice system is very anti-justice. Bloody shameful 😮😡
Sorry to hear what happened to you when you was younger GG 🙏🙏✝️✝️
Thank you watched it righ throughout along with the pope ❤
Justice May mean Justice for the parents against the hospital.
My dad died of a heart attack in the late 80s and his body was taken to that hospital. The day after the police rang me to tell me his body had gone missing . after a couple of days It turned out an undertaker had collected his body but the hospital hadnt made anÿ record of it
Something to do with the government..
Always thought things didn't ring true with this from the start
Remember they give jabs to babies now without consent were they testing new drugs etc and pinned the blame on a young lady who is not able to defend herself!? This whole thing completely stinks.😡
i'm so glad he did this reading , i had no idea it was like this , BlackBeltBarrister on YT and a few others have touched upon it , i hope she is freed asap 😕
Im so sorry to hear your story and totally understand." Video suggestion" Do we live on a prison planet? are there other planets like Earth that is a utopa?
Interesting , thank you 😀
I would love to see LL walk free. Someone contaminated the bags of saline with Insulin. I seem to remember. (I’m not a nurse. Then there were the guilty conscience notes admitting these things. I never heard her say “ I didn’t do any of this” I would have answered every question with I didn’t murder any babies. Not stand there being accused. She was her own worst enemy.
I have worked as a neonatal nurse for 14 yes and I can tell you it is very difficult to inject insulin into a baby's IV fluids without someone realising very quickly that something untoward is happening with the insulin. Medicines are more tightly controlled in Neonates and children's wards than adults. It is not as easy to contaminate fluid bags as it would be in adults. Why did that baby have high levels of insulin in its blood. We don't normally do insulin levels in Neonates. The only time I have known blood insulin levels to come back on a baby was when we had a baby that had consistently low blood sugars even after being fed. We did bloods for a hypo pack and it came back there was a metabolic reason for the blood sugars being low and a certain milk was recommended. Once the baby was on the correct feeds the blood sugars corrected. As for the notes she wrote, when a baby becomes very ill or dies on your shift and you are the one looking after that baby, even if this happens on the shift after yours, you do a lot of soul searching. You ask yourself was there something you missed, was there something more you could have done, and you read through your notes looking for what you missed. I can understand her notes because that's how any nurse would feel if they were working shifts and babies they were looking after were dying on those shifts. My gut instinct and my experience tells me more was going on in this unit than we are being told. They were understaffed and kept taking sick babies even putting themselves over their funded beds. Why were they not transferring out sicker babies and closing the unit to babies being transferred from other hospitals? That's a management failing and that could have contributed to those babies deaths. I agree with people who say she's a scapegoat because I think she is and I also think she foolishly worked over the working time directive of 48 hrs and didn't have a legal leg to stand on, when things went wrong. She worked full-time and did overtime or bank shifts. There would have been weeks she was over her 48hrs. She was the most likely scapegoat because the likelihood of her being on duty when these babies died or became unwell was increased because of these extra shifts( bank or overtime)."
I'm thinking about the number of people who were treated inappropriately when sick with covid. Effective treatments were banned and withheld, end of life treatments were given instead.
Has there similarly been some 'less than optimum' standard of care imposed regards babies?
So she was betrayed by the king (doctor A?) because the ward was overburdened...
When i seen this in the news i felt that she didn't do it. And just seen this to see if you got the same.
Yes but she failed to put a tube that had dislodged from a babies nose whilst the doctor was actually in the room and he asked her why she had not checked consistently enough and replaced it. When you are overseeing prematures surely your checking every five minutes or so
She might not have replaced the NG tube because the baby was not needing fed at that time. I was a neonatal nurse for 14 years and I would have replaced a displaced NG tube closer to the time the baby was to be fed as it is very traumatic for the little ones. You could replace it before hand but chances are the baby will pull that one out too, so to minimise trauma leave it closer to the time of a feed. That's my rationale anyway. As for doctors they don't know everything and I have yet to see a doctor pass a NG tube in neonatal.
Also, no we don't check every 5 mins. Before you feed by NG you check the tube hasn't moved and you are checking stomach ph before feeding. That is sufficient. You don't even do obs every 5 mins, every HR if need be but very rarely more frequent than that even for the most ill and premature babies.
@@SanchaHaskins-hl6ng My nephew has just come out of a neonatal unit and so your comment about the baby pulling the tube out rang true for me. That's exactly what he was doing.
The only other time you would have an Orogastric tube in for reasons other than feeding would be if a baby was on CPAP to allow the air that would accumulate in the stomach to escape. Otherwise that air would press on the chest making breathing more difficult. That tube would have to be replaced quickly should the baby pull it out but if you have a baby that lively it may not be a good idea to continue with CPAP. In my unit it was practice to pass an Orogastric or Nasogastric tube before a chest x-ray. Do we know if the baby in question was on CPAP or needing a chest x-ray?
@@pennylando3145❤
Please please please can ypu do the social care system 🙏 😢 😭 😫
The expert that the prosecution relied on to convict her . Has now said he doesn't think his expert opinion was now wrong .plus as you said babys were still ending up dead when she was not even there . I mean there is a lot of this evidence that totally doesn't add up . I feel terrible for the familys but this conviction is not safe . I belive it was hospital pratices and lucy was scapegoat and it was a very very poorly run hospital poor management. This lucy was pressured and under resources made her job and many others were struggling. I think it was another post office tainted blood scandel
Why did Delores O'Readon die in the bathtub with all of her clothes on. Did she commit suicide with alcohol
She guilty! There is an inquiry going on now. You obviously know absolutely nothing about the case but have made up your mind and read the cards accordingly. Unsubscribed
If it's so clear-cut , why the "inquiry "?
@@Piper_demi. The inquiry has been set up to find out why Letby was allowed to go on murdering premature babies. The consultants wanted her off the unit much months before she was finally taken off. If management had listened to them, several lives could have been saved. If you are not following the Thirlwall Inquiry, I recommend it for some absolutely jaw-dropping behaviour (like the Post Office, in fact). The transcripts of each day are on the website.
Which means you do know something.
What makes you so sure she is guilty?
Yes, it's the Thirlwall inquiry, but it's not an inquiry into Letby's innocence or guilt.
Letby was found guilty by a jury who, having considered the evidence, concluded that she murdered these babies. The inquiry is looking at the practices within the hospital that allowed this to happen. This is a quote from the Daily Telegraph on 29th October:
"At the beginning of the inquiry Lady Justice Thirwall said *the issue of Letby’s guilt was not in dispute* and that the inquiry would not ‘set about reviewing convictions’.
This means that the evidence they are using in the inquiry must be the same evidence that was presented in court. It's the evidence that found Lucy Letby guilty. But that is *the* problem, maryc - it's the evidence that was presented in court that some professionals have disputed and which has led to concerns that Letby may not be guilty.