Hi Jesse, thanks again for another great video that confirms what I think: those tools are worthless without a preliminary work. That said, I am curious to know if your quick or custom workflow also deliver content in other languages. Many thanks.
I've been using it to do seed articles as a test to see what grabs, in conjunction with larger articles with well researched SEO to my limited extent of knowledge of how to do that. I also use it to do sections of articles and then combine into one long article around 2,000 words for a complete answer. This strategy works in one my niches and I am still playing around in another niche and testing to see the best way it will work in that niche.
Man this is excellent. These furus telling everyone can type a few prompts into an AI chatbot and it magically spits out everything you need are going to fail in the long run. You have to put in SOME work if you want to rise to the top and beat the fly-by-night operators.
Hi Jesse. Loving the content brother. Keep it coming. Question for you. Are you planning on adding another course to your masterclass involving KW research and using the custom article workflow? I am signed up for the masterclass but have yet to use the custom article workflow. How would you rate it out the box, provided proper KW research is done?
Thanks for the comment! I'm focusing on the Maverick Method right now. Once that's finished then we'll jump into a real-life website use-case of the AI tools + Maverick Method concepts. It'll be very detailed just like it already is but with a website of mine. Provided proper KW research is done via headings and LSIs, the CAW is very good. I use it for websites right now. There are members who run their articles through different 3rd party tools and they are scoring super high on optimization scores etc.
Not yet - definitely something we are working on. I want to be able to click a button so that it only has one instance of a particular keyword so I can interlink properly. Still rolling out features. TY for the comment.
@@jessecunninghamv it is machine learning yes, but BERT converts words into embeddings, and understands words contextually as well.. BERT is used on most search queries where there is enough volume... where as no or low volume queries might not get BERT "yet".. this is how the occasional spam site makes it past the defense. But unedited raw AI output can be considered poor quality if it has several patterns that lead to poor user experience. So yes, google may deindex AI content if it has these patterns.. the patterns are things such as redundant/repeating sentences, rewording a statement a different way several times (still redundant)... excess use of exact match keywords etc
Great comment. So despite Google saying it doesn't have an issue with AI, do you think they may deindex regardless? Maybe use the veil of "helpful content"?
@@jessecunninghamv Theoretically yes they can deindex based on criteria they deem poor quality, saturation, etc. People think every piece of content that is published gets the same treatment and that simply isn't true. For over-saturated content, meaning google already has 150k pages indexed covering that specific query, google may have stricter criteria to index. If you're content is just repeating what they already have in index, they may simply say "we're good on this, thanks but we'll pass". It's all about money today, with trillions of pages indexed, they are looking to reduce the load. The landscape has changed but there are still gurus teaching 2017 SERP SEO. Also, as someone else said, don't drop too many post at once for existing sites that have been around and doesn't have a record of 50 posts in a day. Schedule 1 or 2 to drop every other day or so.
Great words. Great comment. Thank you for that. I'm experimenting the frequency of blog posts to see what gets indexed - hoping to walk that line of as many as possible without throwing "the switch" of deindexing.
Thanks for watching!! Sign up for the newsletter here: jessecunninghamseo.com/
I have been following you since you had 1k subs and i know this for sure- if one got information & right knowledge, anyone can grow.
Thanks!!!
Great gems dropped on this video. Appreciate it Jesse, just signed up for the newsletter.
Hi Jesse, thanks again for another great video that confirms what I think: those tools are worthless without a preliminary work.
That said, I am curious to know if your quick or custom workflow also deliver content in other languages.
Many thanks.
Thank you! It is 100% on the roadmap. Huge priority for us is to do languages.
@@jessecunninghamv Thats great, cant wait to use it!!
Hi Jesse, did you send out the newsletter?
I subscribed but didn't receive anything
I've been using it to do seed articles as a test to see what grabs, in conjunction with larger articles with well researched SEO to my limited extent of knowledge of how to do that. I also use it to do sections of articles and then combine into one long article around 2,000 words for a complete answer. This strategy works in one my niches and I am still playing around in another niche and testing to see the best way it will work in that niche.
The Custom Article Workflow?
@@jessecunninghamv oops no GPT. I want to use the custom article workflow but I'mm building up some money to use the API first
is web pilot the same as co-pilot?
Another informative video. Great Job Jesse!
Thanks Scott! I appreciate the kind words. They mean a lot - keepings the creative juices flowing!!
Man this is excellent. These furus telling everyone can type a few prompts into an AI chatbot and it magically spits out everything you need are going to fail in the long run. You have to put in SOME work if you want to rise to the top and beat the fly-by-night operators.
🚀🚀🚀thank you for the comment. It still takes hard work despite whatever tools we have today.
Custom Article Workflow does not show up, just the quick article workflow. PLEASE HELP
It shows up. Make sure you click on the button to toggle between the tools
Hi Jesse,
Do you acquire websites? If so how can I contact you?
I do at times. Feel free to reach out on the website homepage.
@@jessecunninghamv Contacted :)
Hi Jesse. Loving the content brother. Keep it coming. Question for you. Are you planning on adding another course to your masterclass involving KW research and using the custom article workflow?
I am signed up for the masterclass but have yet to use the custom article workflow.
How would you rate it out the box, provided proper KW research is done?
Thanks for the comment! I'm focusing on the Maverick Method right now. Once that's finished then we'll jump into a real-life website use-case of the AI tools + Maverick Method concepts. It'll be very detailed just like it already is but with a website of mine.
Provided proper KW research is done via headings and LSIs, the CAW is very good. I use it for websites right now. There are members who run their articles through different 3rd party tools and they are scoring super high on optimization scores etc.
@@jessecunninghamv Do you have an email I can reach you at? I have some specific questions from the MC.
Yeah 100% - it is in the about of this channel: www.youtube.com/@jessecunninghamv/about
hello, why it's not showing a custom Workflow?
I'll send the CAW link via newsletter.
@@jessecunninghamv Received your mail thanks for sending link .
Is there a work around to be able to specify the Keyword Density percentage in the CAW?
Not yet - definitely something we are working on. I want to be able to click a button so that it only has one instance of a particular keyword so I can interlink properly. Still rolling out features. TY for the comment.
Thanks for the quick response.
Already one of your students. This is just another channel I have.
Love the tool and the masterclass!
Nice!!!!! 🚀🚀🚀 feel free to reach out anytime
What extension are you using to get the page structure?
Which part of the video?
Sorry, at 5:36 you used the extension...
Got it - SEO META in 1 Click
Tha k you!
Where is the custom workflow i signed up to the newsletter
I'll send out a newsletter blast today. Thanks for the joining the newsletter.
@@jessecunninghamv much love ❤️
How to copy the text our of Quick Article Workflow with the Headin and markdown? Its blank text after copy it.
Are you using a block editor or just straight html WP editor? It's designed for elementor and gutenburg type of editors.
@@jessecunninghamv im using wp bakery editor
And it does not bring over the H2 formatting?
@@jessecunninghamv no it dosent
@@jessecunninghamv not even in elemtor for me idk why
Love to see the results of the voting 👍
Me too! Thanks for the comment 🚀🚀
When we wil get "custom workflow"??
It's available - are you on the newsletter?
@@jessecunninghamv no, how to get access??
jessecunninghamseo.com
@@jessecunninghamv Signup!! then what?
Ill shoot out a email later today
I think this time you buy a new camera
Been thinking about it. Suggestions?
waited your video from the last 4 days.
I'm back! Thanks for the comment.
You keep saying google doesn’t understand words… you do know google has been using NLP and BERT since 2019 right?
It understands words. Agreed. It understands words through math.
@@jessecunninghamv it is machine learning yes, but BERT converts words into embeddings, and understands words contextually as well.. BERT is used on most search queries where there is enough volume... where as no or low volume queries might not get BERT "yet".. this is how the occasional spam site makes it past the defense. But unedited raw AI output can be considered poor quality if it has several patterns that lead to poor user experience. So yes, google may deindex AI content if it has these patterns.. the patterns are things such as redundant/repeating sentences, rewording a statement a different way several times (still redundant)... excess use of exact match keywords etc
Great comment. So despite Google saying it doesn't have an issue with AI, do you think they may deindex regardless? Maybe use the veil of "helpful content"?
@@jessecunninghamv Theoretically yes they can deindex based on criteria they deem poor quality, saturation, etc. People think every piece of content that is published gets the same treatment and that simply isn't true. For over-saturated content, meaning google already has 150k pages indexed covering that specific query, google may have stricter criteria to index. If you're content is just repeating what they already have in index, they may simply say "we're good on this, thanks but we'll pass". It's all about money today, with trillions of pages indexed, they are looking to reduce the load. The landscape has changed but there are still gurus teaching 2017 SERP SEO. Also, as someone else said, don't drop too many post at once for existing sites that have been around and doesn't have a record of 50 posts in a day. Schedule 1 or 2 to drop every other day or so.
Great words. Great comment. Thank you for that. I'm experimenting the frequency of blog posts to see what gets indexed - hoping to walk that line of as many as possible without throwing "the switch" of deindexing.