They are not only bulky, but huge. Compare their size to anything. Remix mod resized them and they fit well, oh and they are now more fragile to armor damage (not a damage sponge anymore), also the gore.
A trend I notice in RA3 vs GenEvo fights is that RA3 factions are often disadvantaged in lower tier combat, especially in the infantry department when it comes to how efficient they are economically, though there are key exceptions. Red Alerts basic infantry and vehicles are favored in situations where they can leverage their unique attributes and special features over just unit spam alone (Conscripts are more damaging with molotovs, Imperial warriors depend on using their swords, Peacekeepers should have at least one using their riot shield to tank hits while exploiting mass AoE fire from the rest), and RA3's high tier unit roster and energy weapons trump nearly anything GenEvo factions can throw at them. Also, RA3 uniquely have access to Naval units and can exploit being in the water which is something GenEvo needs support powers, aircraft and/or artillery to even attempt combating. The big thing is that GenEvo and RA3 factions have very different design philosophies and balance when compared to eachother, which places each other at extreme advantage or disadvantage in different matchups.
The force that cut its teeth facing a global liberation army lost only when it had a shallower bag of tricks to draw from. Not once when the fight was an honest exchange of murder. It seems the armies of Generals are focused around the kill, measuring all by it for effectiveness. Mission by mission, success by success, they're in motion to win campaigns and return home. Whereas the Red Alert armies focus on the strategic reaching for anything they can, in the hope of finding the golden bullet that wins what seems like a never-ending cycle of new enemy after new enemy. Opposite sides of the same coin, I think.
Nah its a disproportionate designe , Rangers are made for versetality and adaptation so no way they be that hard to get killed by peacekeepers, while peacekeepers are made as tough tactical infantry for urban war, less adaptive but highly armored and precise in close combat, also adding flashbang and bulletproof shelid will mix things up , so as long as the ranger faces the peacekeeper , the peacekeeper will win absolutely but if talking about other attributes, the Ranger is more useful
Crusader vs Guardian Armament: 105 Rifled vs 90mm Smoothbore another nit pick would be laser crusaders vs mirage tanks .... mirage tanks should've been paired vs paladins...
Really goes to show RA3's soldier models are extremely bulky. Generals' original models are skinnier and more proportional in comparison
They are not only bulky, but huge. Compare their size to anything. Remix mod resized them and they fit well, oh and they are now more fragile to armor damage (not a damage sponge anymore), also the gore.
When the US had enough of the Allied nations.
Paladin tanks: Preserving Freedom
A trend I notice in RA3 vs GenEvo fights is that RA3 factions are often disadvantaged in lower tier combat, especially in the infantry department when it comes to how efficient they are economically, though there are key exceptions. Red Alerts basic infantry and vehicles are favored in situations where they can leverage their unique attributes and special features over just unit spam alone (Conscripts are more damaging with molotovs, Imperial warriors depend on using their swords, Peacekeepers should have at least one using their riot shield to tank hits while exploiting mass AoE fire from the rest), and RA3's high tier unit roster and energy weapons trump nearly anything GenEvo factions can throw at them.
Also, RA3 uniquely have access to Naval units and can exploit being in the water which is something GenEvo needs support powers, aircraft and/or artillery to even attempt combating.
The big thing is that GenEvo and RA3 factions have very different design philosophies and balance when compared to eachother, which places each other at extreme advantage or disadvantage in different matchups.
The force that cut its teeth facing a global liberation army lost only when it had a shallower bag of tricks to draw from. Not once when the fight was an honest exchange of murder.
It seems the armies of Generals are focused around the kill, measuring all by it for effectiveness. Mission by mission, success by success, they're in motion to win campaigns and return home.
Whereas the Red Alert armies focus on the strategic reaching for anything they can, in the hope of finding the golden bullet that wins what seems like a never-ending cycle of new enemy after new enemy.
Opposite sides of the same coin, I think.
@ShadowVR2 I think we agree. I just worded it fancily, here. How sway?
The American solder has the up of flash grenade which kill and infants instant kill
GLA vs Japan
Mad lads vs technology
pls make some more. I'd like to see how every RA factions fair against the GLA lol.
Nah its a disproportionate designe , Rangers are made for versetality and adaptation so no way they be that hard to get killed by peacekeepers, while peacekeepers are made as tough tactical infantry for urban war, less adaptive but highly armored and precise in close combat, also adding flashbang and bulletproof shelid will mix things up , so as long as the ranger faces the peacekeeper , the peacekeeper will win absolutely but if talking about other attributes, the Ranger is more useful
Rangers, lead the way!
What I find funny is you make the usa troops the UN colors and the UN troops USA colors
Howcome the rangers did not use their flashbangs?
This fight was personal.
Can you make China vs USSR fight?
Crusader vs Guardian
Armament: 105 Rifled vs 90mm Smoothbore
another nit pick would be laser crusaders vs mirage tanks .... mirage tanks should've been paired vs paladins...
Ranger it Advanced Soldier of US Army
Where re the drones ? i remember that USA can build drones for their tanks.
May be in the next update
How turn on RA3 fraction in this mod?
I used RA3 world builder
BRUH THIS AINT RIGHT MAN USA AND ALLIED ARE ONE I MEAN USA IS ALLIED AND ALLIED IS USA
civil war
How you crossover it?
I use Red Alert 3 world builder
FREEBRAM!!!!!!! XD
seriously shotguns vs assault rifles wtf the soviets have aks while the usa have m16/m4a1
anyone pros and cons of shotgun vs assault rifle