@@exterminator4808 Hello dear. Thanks for the kind words. Are nai nai yr NASA jane ki jrurat nai hai, UA-cam pe abhi bhi kuch channel hai jo 'science' sikhate hain. Learning a lot from them. Should I suggest you? So that you know science sikhne ke liye NASA jane ki jrurat nai hai?
@@harshitrajput6865 NASA me log science sikhne ke liye nahi jate hai, science me contribute karne ke liye jate hay, sarcasm samjha karo. Science is about facts and beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. Yeh topic kindergarden students ke liye nahi hai ki sabkuch all bright and colorful and attractive hona chahiye. Science science hai, tumhe maza nahi aa raha hai iska matlab yeh nahi ki topic bekar hai ya Professor bekar hai. As for this Professor, yeh thora slow bolte hai lekin speed 1.5-2 times karne se sab thik ho jata hai. I guess you don't need to know science to understand that. And the quality of his lecture is good, very good. Kaha kaha se yeh sab aa jate hai, sabkuch me inlogoko story chahiye. Jaise bachhe hai, bhulake khilana, sulana etc karna parta hai.
@@exterminator4808 Bro you were the one who said NASA chala ja science sikhne ko milega, now you're saying nasa log science sikhne nai jate I mean.. main toh tabse yhei bolra hu ki science sikhne ke liye NASA jane ki jrurat nai h, and I very well do agree on ki people go to nasa to contribute to science, no issues with that. 'Beauty lies in the eyes of beholder' bro ye saying ek context ke sath jati hai, iss context me ye fit nai hgi, it's like if someone's watching 💩 and he says it's bad, you're saying him beauty lies in the eyes of beholder. And it's not about being colourful and bright, it's about being interesting. Now that I understand this topic very well, I certainly know how bad this teaching is. Mene kabhi ye bat boli hi nai ki topic bekr hai ye tumne assumption liya, but I definitely meant ki teaching absolute pathetic hai, as a teacher your job is to make things interesting for students, and this is surely not something a student would enjoy watching, the views tell. I mean just look how prof. Is writing, as if his writing is saying, please write me better. Ek prof. Ka kam hai topic ko teach krna, interesting banana students ke liye, Verna ye sab toh ek engineer bhi janta hai, what's the diff then. And if this is something that looks 'good, very good' to you, then you ll be blown away if you see a Walter Lewin lecture. Alag dimension me na chle jao tum fir toh.
@@harshitrajput6865 As I said, this isn't Kindergarden. The job of a professor is to teach, not to "Babu, please look at this, look how interesting this is... come on you must learn this, this will help you in life... yada yada". If you have doubts, he will clear it. In case he or she cannot, then you get the chance to complain. Also if he isn't able to communicate or is unable to make you understand concepts, then you can complain. Your comment reminds me of those kids in 8-9 who have no interest in studying and are looking to blame the teacher for it in any way they can, to be very honest. This is goddamn college. Your proff ain't gonna spoonfeed you. And if you really want that kinda knowledge, go check out Mark Rober's channel. Lekin yeh apni jagah hai and woh apni jagah. Waha pe topics interesting and practical hai, but it lacks in details. I don't think you understand nor do I expect you to understand. And by the way, you say you understand the topic at hand i.e welding very well? Well where do you think my opinion that this professor is teaching well comes from? It sure as hell didn't drop from the sky.
1.5x is the answer
Thanks for the wonderful lecture Sir
thank u sir..
thanks sir
Thank u sir
People work so hard to get into this institute? Destroying the beauty of science
Tu ja na bhosrike,NASA me chale ja, bahut science sikhne ko milega. Like they will even consider taking you in!
@@exterminator4808 Hello dear. Thanks for the kind words. Are nai nai yr NASA jane ki jrurat nai hai, UA-cam pe abhi bhi kuch channel hai jo 'science' sikhate hain. Learning a lot from them. Should I suggest you? So that you know science sikhne ke liye NASA jane ki jrurat nai hai?
@@harshitrajput6865 NASA me log science sikhne ke liye nahi jate hai, science me contribute karne ke liye jate hay, sarcasm samjha karo. Science is about facts and beauty is in the eyes of the beholder. Yeh topic kindergarden students ke liye nahi hai ki sabkuch all bright and colorful and attractive hona chahiye. Science science hai, tumhe maza nahi aa raha hai iska matlab yeh nahi ki topic bekar hai ya Professor bekar hai. As for this Professor, yeh thora slow bolte hai lekin speed 1.5-2 times karne se sab thik ho jata hai. I guess you don't need to know science to understand that. And the quality of his lecture is good, very good. Kaha kaha se yeh sab aa jate hai, sabkuch me inlogoko story chahiye. Jaise bachhe hai, bhulake khilana, sulana etc karna parta hai.
@@exterminator4808 Bro you were the one who said NASA chala ja science sikhne ko milega, now you're saying nasa log science sikhne nai jate I mean.. main toh tabse yhei bolra hu ki science sikhne ke liye NASA jane ki jrurat nai h, and I very well do agree on ki people go to nasa to contribute to science, no issues with that. 'Beauty lies in the eyes of beholder' bro ye saying ek context ke sath jati hai, iss context me ye fit nai hgi, it's like if someone's watching 💩 and he says it's bad, you're saying him beauty lies in the eyes of beholder. And it's not about being colourful and bright, it's about being interesting. Now that I understand this topic very well, I certainly know how bad this teaching is. Mene kabhi ye bat boli hi nai ki topic bekr hai ye tumne assumption liya, but I definitely meant ki teaching absolute pathetic hai, as a teacher your job is to make things interesting for students, and this is surely not something a student would enjoy watching, the views tell. I mean just look how prof. Is writing, as if his writing is saying, please write me better. Ek prof. Ka kam hai topic ko teach krna, interesting banana students ke liye, Verna ye sab toh ek engineer bhi janta hai, what's the diff then. And if this is something that looks 'good, very good' to you, then you ll be blown away if you see a Walter Lewin lecture. Alag dimension me na chle jao tum fir toh.
@@harshitrajput6865 As I said, this isn't Kindergarden. The job of a professor is to teach, not to "Babu, please look at this, look how interesting this is... come on you must learn this, this will help you in life... yada yada". If you have doubts, he will clear it. In case he or she cannot, then you get the chance to complain. Also if he isn't able to communicate or is unable to make you understand concepts, then you can complain. Your comment reminds me of those kids in 8-9 who have no interest in studying and are looking to blame the teacher for it in any way they can, to be very honest. This is goddamn college. Your proff ain't gonna spoonfeed you. And if you really want that kinda knowledge, go check out Mark Rober's channel. Lekin yeh apni jagah hai and woh apni jagah. Waha pe topics interesting and practical hai, but it lacks in details. I don't think you understand nor do I expect you to understand. And by the way, you say you understand the topic at hand i.e welding very well? Well where do you think my opinion that this professor is teaching well comes from? It sure as hell didn't drop from the sky.
Lecture delivery is not attractive.
watch at 2x
worst........
worst comment