Hi Prem.. Thanks is a small word for all your videos.. You are an amazing content creator and mentor.. 💐💐💐 May I request you to please update the lecture on application validation and ruleset validation topic because I feel there is so much of confusion.
Then how can I refer Branch Activity from Alife activity am not able to do that even if I mention development rule set as pre requisiyte, how to do thta?
Hi prem in ruleset validation ruleset which is define as prerequisite and it should on same layer then only we can call that rule right and also the below layer
Hi Prem.. I didn't get the last point. Alife activity was not able to call Development activity even though Dvpt was added in the dependency ruleset because Dvpt ruleset is in the top layer.. bt the same didn't happen in case of ClaimsApp activity in Alife activity. But even Alife is the organization layer and ClaimsApp is implementation layer.. so, the context of layering is coming here in this case also, right.. wat else extra is being different here?
Valid question, please take these validations on application layering level. Since I created one Implementation application and included both implementation and organizational rulessets in the same application, that is why it is able to refer
Prem please tell How to delete complete application in pega like all instance of that application and all rulesets evrything of tht application which is associated with that application.
No Sucharitha, not always.. As I told in the video, if you have an enterprise application separately then you can change organizational rulessets in the enterprise application to application validation mode.. If else, it is better you keep it as ruleset validation itself..
Thanks Prem, waited for long time
Hi Prem.. Thanks is a small word for all your videos.. You are an amazing content creator and mentor.. 💐💐💐
May I request you to please update the lecture on application validation and ruleset validation topic because I feel there is so much of confusion.
good explanation and information! ty
Then how can I refer Branch Activity from Alife activity am not able to do that even if I mention development rule set as pre requisiyte, how to do thta?
Hi prem in ruleset validation ruleset which is define as prerequisite and it should on same layer then only we can call that rule right and also the below layer
yes you are right
Hi Prem.. I didn't get the last point. Alife activity was not able to call Development activity even though Dvpt was added in the dependency ruleset because Dvpt ruleset is in the top layer.. bt the same didn't happen in case of ClaimsApp activity in Alife activity. But even Alife is the organization layer and ClaimsApp is implementation layer.. so, the context of layering is coming here in this case also, right.. wat else extra is being different here?
Valid question, please take these validations on application layering level. Since I created one Implementation application and included both implementation and organizational rulessets in the same application, that is why it is able to refer
@@myknowpega you didn't tell us this in the video
thank you
@@saikumarbandi5937 in application creation video, he created all rulesets in implementation layer, it didn't need to be specifically told.
Nice
Thanks 😊
Prem please tell How to delete complete application in pega like all instance of that application and all rulesets evrything of tht application which is associated with that application.
why there is no opportunity for pega developer as a fresher
Hi Prem
Very good explanation.is there any advantage over using application validation or rulest validation
Hi
What is "ruledispatcherimpl.invoke-failed" error please help
which one is faster validation?
Hi Prem,
Is it necessary to change organization rulesets to application validation mode
No Sucharitha, not always..
As I told in the video, if you have an enterprise application separately then you can change organizational rulessets in the enterprise application to application validation mode..
If else, it is better you keep it as ruleset validation itself..
Little confusing
Nice