135 | SpaceX Starship - What's left until the launch?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 гру 2024
  • This Episode is sponsored by Brilliant
    The First 200 to join through the link will get 20% off the annual Premium subscription! brilliant.org/...
    Welcome to Episode 135 of What about it!?
    Today amongst other things I’ll explain to you, when we might see another attempt at a 15-kilometer flight from SpaceX’s Starship and why Rocket Lab recovering an Electron rocket booster is a huge deal for the whole space industry.
    RGV Aerial Photography - Become a Flight-Supporter!
    / rgvaerial
    Credit:
    ⭐SpaceX
    ⭐NASA
    ⭐RGV Aerial Photography on Twitter: @RGVaerialphotos
    ⭐Mary on Twitter: @bocachicagal
    ⭐www.nasaspacef...
    ⭐Nick Henning on Twitter: @NickHenning3D
    ⭐ErcX on Twitter: @ErcXspace
    ⭐Caspar Stanley on Twitter: @Caspar_Stanley
    ⭐Neopork on Twitter: @Neopork85
    ⭐Corey on Twitter: @C_Bass3d
    ⭐Wavetrex Infinity for awesome Photoshoppy of Elons name!
    Editing: Alex Potvin
    Starman animations by Tashanimation
    Thumbnail: @neopork
    ✔️Merchandise Store: shop.spreadshi...
    ✔️Patreon: / whataboutit
    ✔️Get a Tesla: ts.la/felix20632
    ✔️Facebook: / what-about-it-39770784...
    ✔️Twitter: @FelixSchlang
    ✔️My Camera: cutt.ly/OevQehy
    ✔️My Microphone: cutt.ly/YevQeM1
    ✔️My lighting: cutt.ly/OevQrxn
    ✔️My tripod: cutt.ly/9evQr4x
    📄Links for this Episode:
    www.spacex.com
    www.spacex.com...

КОМЕНТАРІ • 372

  • @Whataboutit
    @Whataboutit  4 роки тому +64

    What is SpaceX building in front of the orbital launch mount?

    • @rocketcello5354
      @rocketcello5354 4 роки тому +4

      Propellant pressurising facility maybe? idk

    • @spaceygamez
      @spaceygamez 4 роки тому +4

      Hi Felix, when do you think the 2020 starship presentation will be?

    • @jibbajabba4597
      @jibbajabba4597 4 роки тому +5

      What about it!? Hot Dog stand.

    • @lpedejong
      @lpedejong 4 роки тому +3

      A new tankfarm

    • @KnoppersBomber
      @KnoppersBomber 4 роки тому +6

      My bet is on a large stationary crane so they can stack the rocket on the launch pad.

  • @peeftribos
    @peeftribos 4 роки тому +49

    I love the fact that I am in my couch watching this amazing video, thinking about all people across the globe doing the same. GO TEAM SPACE

    • @peeftribos
      @peeftribos 4 роки тому +4

      Cheers from Brazil!

    • @PerisK4
      @PerisK4 4 роки тому +3

      I like your thought my friend. Greetings from Greece 🇬🇷🇬🇷🇬🇷

    • @gadfly5792
      @gadfly5792 4 роки тому +1

      Greetings from Georgia USA boyo!

    • @singular123er
      @singular123er 4 роки тому +1

      greetings from sudan

    • @pablolagos5532
      @pablolagos5532 4 роки тому

      Lol same, greetings from Chile!

  • @rossthiffairyan
    @rossthiffairyan 4 роки тому +149

    Rocket lab really hit the nail on the head going smaller then SpaceX. They have thier niche now. Good luck rocket lab!!!

    • @zackjoubert5207
      @zackjoubert5207 4 роки тому +9

      They couldn't have competed otherwise.

    • @rocroc
      @rocroc 4 роки тому +9

      SpaceX still has the technology of the Grasshopper and could easily compete with Rocket Lab if they choose to do so. SpaceX's goal is cost per kilogram and they think they can handle it all with Starship. I look at it and see no sense to it while Elon looks at it and sees differently. I think they will probably go with Elon:-)

    • @wrwhiteal
      @wrwhiteal 4 роки тому +3

      how can Rocket Lab can be successful or even survive orbiting a 300kg payload for $7.5 million while Starship can orbit 100,000 kg for $2 million?

    • @mitseraffej5812
      @mitseraffej5812 4 роки тому +3

      @@wrwhiteal . In my opinion Starship is a few years from being operational even for satellite launch. In the meantime Rocket Lab can carry on doing its thing. The other advantage Rocket Lab has is geographical . Very little air and sea traffic to restrict launch frequency in there part of the world.

    • @mitseraffej5812
      @mitseraffej5812 4 роки тому +2

      “their” part of the world.

  • @aaronak2005
    @aaronak2005 4 роки тому +4

    New WAI video, just what I needed on this cold and windy Alaska day! You never fail to keep us informed. Thank you Felix for all that you and your team do. Maria Pointer thank you too for your dedication and continuous video :-) Congrats Peter Beck and Rocketlab, one step closer!

  • @chrischeshire6528
    @chrischeshire6528 4 роки тому +42

    Mary is great. highly dedicated and a professional in the craft of photography. She belongs on the cover of Time magazine as Person of the Year!

    • @Dragn1089
      @Dragn1089 4 роки тому +4

      Mary really does have an eye for it. It really helps that she is knowledgeable about what she's filming. I wonder if people really appreciate how in touch she keeps us. If she wasn't able to film for a month or two, we would be lost. As would the many, many related channel that use her footage. Thanks so much Mary!

  • @odysseusrex5908
    @odysseusrex5908 4 роки тому +1

    I find it very interesting that, no matter how many times Beck says, in public, that the primary purpose of recovery for Rocket Lab is flight cadence, people still confidently post about how it will massively reduce their cost. Of course, in that interview clip, he did say there is a possibility of the economics changing, which is also interesting.

  • @neonempire1684
    @neonempire1684 4 роки тому +114

    I dunno Felix, I like my fuel terminals big!

    • @E4S65
      @E4S65 4 роки тому +4

      I love those comment suggestions shown on screen. Brilliant!

  • @BakuganBrawler211
    @BakuganBrawler211 4 роки тому +9

    Kind thanks to Felix and the team for all the work they do making these videos! Excelsior 🚀

  • @shaunhansard8211
    @shaunhansard8211 4 роки тому +3

    Well done WAI! You’re quickly becoming my favourite news channel! Keep up the great work! ...YOU ROCK!!!

  • @petebarnesTaiChi
    @petebarnesTaiChi 4 роки тому +1

    Great to see successful private companies in the space industry. Well done Rocket Lab for your successful recovery of the booster.

  • @soylentgreen6667
    @soylentgreen6667 4 роки тому +1

    It's really great to see another small company like spacex showing all the rino companies ,we know who they all are. The 21st century and how recovery of their rockets is the path forward in reaching for the stars. You and your team really do ROCK!!! 🖖.

  • @neonempire1684
    @neonempire1684 4 роки тому +60

    I'm showing love because I was told to

  • @phunkydroid
    @phunkydroid 4 роки тому +33

    Your closure list isn't up to date... they filed one yesterday for today, with static fire listed in the doc! Road is currently closed, could be SF in the next couple hours.

    • @Whataboutit
      @Whataboutit  4 роки тому +9

      It is. Look again. :) Watching LabPadre right now! :D

    • @timschafer2536
      @timschafer2536 4 роки тому +3

      And a static fire happened

    • @americankid7782
      @americankid7782 4 роки тому

      @phunkydroid the website has been updated and currently displays new closure dates.

  • @TobiasStevens137
    @TobiasStevens137 4 роки тому +1

    Thanks Felix and team, you rock!

  • @MrGunnarPower
    @MrGunnarPower 4 роки тому +1

    Thank you all for bringing us this hope for the future

  • @honilock577
    @honilock577 4 роки тому +2

    Can I just say that WAI probably has the best produced and made videos out there.. Tim Dodd's vids look cool too but here you can see the coop of people to bring you THE best explanation they can. Stay sharp WAI family, you rock!

  • @compassionandwisdom4311
    @compassionandwisdom4311 4 роки тому +1

    Schönen guten Tag Felix. I love your program you and your team is amazing. FYI it’s imprecise not unprecise.
    Keep up the amazing work.
    Lg from the Canadian in Ulm.

  • @treefarm3288
    @treefarm3288 4 роки тому +9

    I think 'leaving a footprint in space' is beyond Rocket Lab's abilities by an order of magnitude.

  • @christianpattison8238
    @christianpattison8238 4 роки тому +1

    Felix WOW awsom video really enjoyed the Rocket Lab section keep up the great work ..

  • @_aullik
    @_aullik 4 роки тому +7

    Thanks for adding Tim asking the hat question.

  • @Ten28film
    @Ten28film 4 роки тому +5

    Your work is amazing! Thank you!

  • @frankwegner303
    @frankwegner303 4 роки тому +1

    Hallo Felix, ich bin froh, erfahren zu haben, dass Du deutscher Herkunft bist. Deine Konversation mit Mo von Senkrechtstarter hat mir gut gefallen. Ja wir leben in einer spannenden Zeit, besonders die Entwicklung einer 100% ige Wiederverwendung einer Orbitalrakete. Genial. Ich folge Dir und den anderen UA-camrn aus technischer Neugier und Begeisterung. Herzlich Frank

  • @ThePeregrinKnight
    @ThePeregrinKnight 4 роки тому +5

    do more interview with people like Peter! loved it!

  • @EricBelardoCyber
    @EricBelardoCyber 4 роки тому +6

    Great job Felix!

  • @StarshipFairing
    @StarshipFairing 4 роки тому +7

    Starship can also do rideshare, but each satellite will get a boost stage for orbital maneuvers and all that. Cost/kg will be significantly lower than rocketlab to same dedicated orvit

    • @peterreedstrom2027
      @peterreedstrom2027 4 роки тому +2

      yes, but people will still use smallsat launchers for a while, at least until starship cadence gets to a high level

    • @sneakytom7416
      @sneakytom7416 4 роки тому +3

      There will be businesses for Rocket Lab, even after Starship reaches higher cadence level. Starship schedules will be tight for sure, and customers will be looking for alternatives. In business terms, you don't have only one supplier. You have many for backups.

    • @Mallchad
      @Mallchad 4 роки тому

      maybe its possible for starship to put electron in orbit.

    • @simongeard4824
      @simongeard4824 4 роки тому +1

      @@Mallchad Not even a challenge... a stacked Electron is about 17m tall, and a little over 1m wide. You could easily fit a dozen of them in the Starship payload bay...

  • @bassben7175
    @bassben7175 4 роки тому +4

    Thx for the Vid, watching the nasaspaceflight stream for the statickfire rn

  • @delinquentdesign
    @delinquentdesign 4 роки тому

    I see the wall molds being put up for thrust diversion being put in place to pour concrete walls above ground around the launch platform. They might backfill earth around those walls to contain the high pressures of the exhaust. In the end it should all be under ground. Makes sense since digging below ground you run into the problem with the water table being so high that you would have problems with ingress of water getting into the work area. Pretty smart build it up instead of under ground into the water table.

  • @udarasampath6066
    @udarasampath6066 4 роки тому

    Thank you very much WAI ❤

  • @Jess-dg6wo
    @Jess-dg6wo 4 роки тому +9

    Static fire 4 is a success.
    Elon on twitter says sn8 flight next week.

    • @buzzsaw838
      @buzzsaw838 4 роки тому

      30% chance of success he said, gonna cry in a corner

    • @Jess-dg6wo
      @Jess-dg6wo 4 роки тому +2

      @@buzzsaw838 i really hoped the sn8 survived.spend 1 months of my life watching her test.

    • @FINtr0ll99
      @FINtr0ll99 4 роки тому

      So many firsts in that flight, it'll be a miracle if it sticks the landing. Will be spectacular no matter what happens! I'm guessing it will land on it's back and that SN9 will succeed.

  • @dougkemme3800
    @dougkemme3800 4 роки тому

    Thanks Felix, love your presentations.

  • @Space_Maniac
    @Space_Maniac 4 роки тому

    Your vids come always in the good timing !
    Was getting nervous from talking to my crush and telling him i love him, started to worry, then this one notification popped
    You rock felix ! WAI go for launch !

  • @garthfarkley
    @garthfarkley 4 роки тому +1

    Great stuff.

  • @Orthanc6
    @Orthanc6 4 роки тому

    Real good point raised here, they won't have a flame-diverter or even launch pad for getting off the Martian surface. For this prototype testing phase it's fine to do what's convenient to make the tests they need, I'd suggest they just bite the bullet and make a flame diverter or some other system to deal with the exhaust. But eventually they will need to design either engines that are robust enough, or landing legs that are long enough to deal with not having any facilities to protect the rocket from it's own exhaust on Mars.
    Obviously the hope is to eventually build launch facilities on Mars, but that could only be after several if not dozens of previous trips. Otherwise, these are 1-way trips

  • @eddiewalpole
    @eddiewalpole 4 роки тому

    Never thought I will hear a phrase "exciting road closures"

  • @pedroascencio5773
    @pedroascencio5773 4 роки тому

    Gracias Susi por los subtitulos ❤🚀

  • @guypehaim1080
    @guypehaim1080 4 роки тому

    What they need is a conical protrusion under the test stand to deflect the engine blast outward instead of straight down. Then if the Martyte comes loose, it will fly outwards instead of upwards.

  • @tonka1802
    @tonka1802 4 роки тому

    You look and sound like you should/are captaining a Starship! Keep up the great content!

  • @ChrisVuletich
    @ChrisVuletich 4 роки тому

    Gotta love Tim Dodd asking the *real* questions!

  • @loukourt1388
    @loukourt1388 4 роки тому +1

    Check out the cows scattering as the Electron rocket takes off! Space Cows!

  • @kezhokezo5472
    @kezhokezo5472 4 роки тому +5

    Now that starship is at the launch pad, everything looks smaller, especially the aerial view of the tank farm next to starship😄

    • @carljohan9265
      @carljohan9265 4 роки тому +1

      Imagine what the full 122 meter stack will look like.

    • @kezhokezo5472
      @kezhokezo5472 4 роки тому

      @@carljohan9265 🤯🤯🤯

  • @epicdaniel508
    @epicdaniel508 4 роки тому +8

    7:00 still can‘t :c
    Thank you for the great update! You rock!

    • @Whataboutit
      @Whataboutit  4 роки тому +1

      You're very welcome, Daniel!!!

  • @tma2001
    @tma2001 4 роки тому

    You know Electron is a tiny rocket when a Falcon 9 can launch over 50x its payload to LEO when reused - recall each Starlink satellite is 260kg and SpaceX launch 60 of them at once!
    fun fact: SpaceX experimented with resuability via parachute but gave up in 2011 to pursue powered descent we all know and love :)

  • @MMTLP-JON
    @MMTLP-JON 4 роки тому +2

    6:45 - Now that's my kind of Space Humor..🚀 🤣😂 🚀 ❗

  • @Blackbird-jg5hi
    @Blackbird-jg5hi 4 роки тому +12

    Your make a good point about Starship not enjoying a thrust diverter/water suppression system waiting for them on Mars. Feels like a huge challenge to safeguard the engine "undercarriage" from debris damage.

    • @MPIronmanJC
      @MPIronmanJC 4 роки тому

      Hm, makes sense then that the first starships to land on mars should contain replacement raptor engines and undercarriage components in case subsequent ships need to perform repairs to be able to make the return trip.

    • @bindingcurve
      @bindingcurve 4 роки тому

      I think a lot of the debris at the landing site is going to get blown away on landing.

    • @peterkacandes5905
      @peterkacandes5905 4 роки тому

      Given the much lower gravity on Mars and the Moon, they’ve already shown that instead of using the main engines for the final landing and takeoff, they will use small versions of thrusters higher up on the Starship until they are high enough off the surface such that they can then ignite the main engines without danger of kicking up debris that could damage the vessel.

    • @poruatokin
      @poruatokin 4 роки тому

      @@peterkacandes5905 Nearly but not quite right. For Mars, they should not need to redesign the engine layout for this reason. However, for the lunar version (no atmosphere & half the gravity of Mars), someone calculated that the thrust from a Starship launch could blast lunar regolith with enough velocity to put it into lunar orbit thus endangering any future low orbit / lander missions. The high level engines are there to land / launch with minimum disturbance.

    • @peterkacandes5905
      @peterkacandes5905 4 роки тому

      @@poruatokin As I understand it, you still need to protect the main engines from rocks/debris that could be kicked up from an unimproved surface, as happened on the test stand with a prepared pad, regardless if it’s the moon or mars. Adding the upper level thrusters, despite the added weight/complexity seems likely to be a good way to address that problem, but I’m no rocket scientist and I trust they’ll figure it out one way or another. Seems like hardening the main engine bay against projectiles sufficiently will add at lot more weight than the upper lever thruster system.

  • @warhawkme6344
    @warhawkme6344 4 роки тому +1

    With the fuel line vault in one section I would say its to protect a set of valves or a supercooler system.

  • @christain9696
    @christain9696 4 роки тому +1

    I am a huge fan of Noam Chomsky... Amazing how rocket lab sent GNOME Chomsky into space! xD

  • @mr_universe4000
    @mr_universe4000 4 роки тому +1

    SpaceX is doing so much work so quickly! 😂 Great update Felix! 👍🏼😄

  • @mattgaming8717
    @mattgaming8717 4 роки тому

    Heli catch from rocket lab? Cant wait.

  • @EmbSys
    @EmbSys 4 роки тому

    What about... the launch mount? Don't you think the OLM might be the foundation for the massive crane which will lift and secure starship? Think about it. The drilling foundation provides the required torque, ... the missing flame diverter, ... it just makes more sense.

  • @arkheavyindutries
    @arkheavyindutries 4 роки тому +5

    6:33
    Maybe they want to relocate the fuel farm closer to the superheavy launch pad

  • @Smashmund
    @Smashmund 4 роки тому +1

    I love it.

  • @bazoo513
    @bazoo513 4 роки тому +3

    Yes, for Electron the main challenge is not damaging Rutherfords (not even nozzles) without re-entry burn like that Falcons perform.

    • @simongeard4824
      @simongeard4824 4 роки тому +1

      Indeed. The idea of a helicopter catch is the bit that amazes most people, but that's probably the easiest part of the operation. The hard part is getting it through re-entry in a re-usable condition, which is why they're not convinced about the cost savings... if the body is intact, they'll be able to increase cadence even if they need to replace all the engines, but they've obviously not going to save much money that way.

    • @bazoo513
      @bazoo513 4 роки тому

      @@simongeard4824 Yes. Some of the "old players" (Arianespace or ULA) is or was playing with an idea of returning only first stage engines, as the most expensive part.

    • @simongeard4824
      @simongeard4824 4 роки тому +1

      @@bazoo513 It was proposed for Vulcan, I believe...detach the engines from the tanks, and recover them by chute...

    • @bazoo513
      @bazoo513 4 роки тому

      @@simongeard4824 Ah, yes. Thanks.

  • @rammie656
    @rammie656 4 роки тому

    Keep up the good work Felix and Team!

  • @JohanMsWorld
    @JohanMsWorld 4 роки тому +9

    Thet still need a watertower, right?
    Jokws aside - They gonna need a lot of fixed infrastructure to support orbital launches including a huge crane. Johan.

    • @rocroc
      @rocroc 4 роки тому +1

      Super Heavy Orbital launches will never happen from Boca Chica using more than six engines. They are building a platform in the gulf and a full engine launch will happen there or in Florida. SX advertised earlier for Platform engineers and I presume the platform is well on its way. It looks to me like even these test launches will require a lot more infrastructure:-) That includes the Boca Chica "orbital" platform being built next to the two other test stands.

  • @alra_4777
    @alra_4777 4 роки тому

    Keep the great job!

  • @AndrewBlucher
    @AndrewBlucher 4 роки тому

    My thought on the "booster scaffold" is that it actually a welding robot that will weld the segments together as they are stacked.

  • @samalashivasurya5574
    @samalashivasurya5574 4 роки тому

    Space x is inspiration

  • @stanbrow
    @stanbrow 4 роки тому

    Fuel terminal would not normally be located in an enclosed building, at least unless the facility was much further North, and needed snow protection.

  • @ArchitekturTV
    @ArchitekturTV 4 роки тому +3

    Gerade dachte ich noch, was guck ich heute Abend bloß auf Netflix und dann „Bling“ geht die Glocke an 😊👍

    • @adrianewert3900
      @adrianewert3900 4 роки тому +1

      Bist du auch vom Interview mit Senkrechtstarter zu WAI gekommen?

    • @ArchitekturTV
      @ArchitekturTV 4 роки тому +1

      ne per Abo Glocke

    • @Whataboutit
      @Whataboutit  4 роки тому +2

      :D Es freut mich, dass wir zur Abendunterhaltung beitragen konnten!

    • @ArchitekturTV
      @ArchitekturTV 4 роки тому

      Danke sehr, jederzeit wieder ;)

    • @nekrugderzweite8298
      @nekrugderzweite8298 4 роки тому

      Kurze Frage, ist er jetzt also deutschsprachig oder nicht? Bin seit kurzem am rätseln ^^

  • @bostonquad2068
    @bostonquad2068 4 роки тому +1

    That was me with the blue helmet on

  • @joshuaphillips4842
    @joshuaphillips4842 4 роки тому +1

    2:28 This is the best DJ set up of all time!

  • @joeweb5581
    @joeweb5581 4 роки тому

    All the rebar by the orbital launch mount appears to be mats pre-tied to make placement faster. Can go in walls or an elevated floor structure.
    Thanks for the info and updates. I love seeing you have a new video to watch.
    Any way for a lunar lander interior update???

  • @stefanieschlang8975
    @stefanieschlang8975 4 роки тому +2

    I loved this episode!

  • @andreasknebel7453
    @andreasknebel7453 4 роки тому

    Hi Felix, do you have an idea, what the part was that looked like a flying flashlight visible at today's SpaceX Starlinklaunch? If you look at the Starlink Satellites immediately before deployment at about 29:20 - 29:30 of the official stream you can see a lighted piece of something soarin over the satellites. Any idea?

  • @InfamoussDBZ
    @InfamoussDBZ 4 роки тому +2

    You'll always sacrifice reliability for reusability when it comes to rockets until proven otherwise.

  • @Fatpumpumlovah2
    @Fatpumpumlovah2 4 роки тому

    1st off since at least 1 engine has been changed static fire tests must be redone, on top of that the pad is still not repaired (it was simply patched up) nor improved apon, with road closure dates recently approved there is no time for any of the above. so dont expect these road closures to be for anything other than static fires (on damaged, unrepaired, un-improved pad)

  • @sarius452
    @sarius452 4 роки тому

    amazing video

  • @fishfinger1699
    @fishfinger1699 4 роки тому +1

    i don’t wanna be nitpicky but please say ”booster number x” instead of ”booster serial number X”, thanks! keep up the amazing updates!!

  • @goncalomatos4767
    @goncalomatos4767 4 роки тому +3

    Well
    I'm showing love because I was told to :D

  • @omegalightning5715
    @omegalightning5715 4 роки тому

    I give it 5 years before we see a shipyard that resembles one from the Star trek movie released in 2010. Elon, good luck to you and all of those you send to leave us behind. Humans on Earth may die, but humanity will survive thanks to you.

  • @romanplays1
    @romanplays1 4 роки тому +12

    well. my body has wrecked itself thanks to my bloody cat waking me up 4 hours early. but this is worth me not sleeping just yet!

    • @Whataboutit
      @Whataboutit  4 роки тому +2

      Maybe cuddle and watch it while falling asleep? :)

  • @AlphaFoxDelta
    @AlphaFoxDelta 4 роки тому

    #ThankYouGabe

  • @capt4in1
    @capt4in1 4 роки тому

    For those who don't get the significance of the Gnome from Gabe Newell, in Half life 2: Episode 2 (a video game from Valve, also owned by Gabe Newell) you can earn an achievement if you carry a garden gnome found at the very beginning of the game, and put it on a rocket at the very end of the game.

  • @markwheeler8339
    @markwheeler8339 4 роки тому

    I'm fairly sure they're going to have a launch platform from every launch. Either from City to City & definitely from the moon or Mars! I mean they're going to have to have refuel facilities first...so its a no brainer

  • @mickmellir7107
    @mickmellir7107 4 роки тому

    Possibly a maintenance area for already completed starships so they don't have to stop building new ones to put damaged ones back in the highbay for repairs?

  • @hometechUK
    @hometechUK 4 роки тому

    They really need a flame diverter, it will help so much.

  • @dugongpoo
    @dugongpoo 4 роки тому

    This all looks so unreal. Firstly, they are building these outside. This never used to happen. They usually build spacecraft in zero contamination hangars, everyone wearing haz mat suits. Also, they just seem to be stacking the empty rings up and calling it a rocket. Where is all the complicated machinery that you normally see? It all seems so cartoonish. Admittedly, what they have achieved so far is really very impressive.

  • @luisalbeiromaldonado5422
    @luisalbeiromaldonado5422 4 роки тому

    Muchas gracias por agregar subtítulos en Español, así dan más ganas ver tus vídeos por qué se de que hablas jejeje
    Buen video 👌

  • @ARUNKUMARV-kh3eb
    @ARUNKUMARV-kh3eb 4 роки тому +2

    Is that everyday Astronaut at 14:12 Who was before that Felix ??

  • @nielsdeckmyn9139
    @nielsdeckmyn9139 4 роки тому +5

    What launch is the call out 'what about it, go for launch' from the intro from?

    • @charliejaxon4707
      @charliejaxon4707 4 роки тому +1

      It would be from the Apollo or early shuttle launches judging from the vid and audio quality :) just a guess

    • @Whataboutit
      @Whataboutit  4 роки тому +2

      Apollo :)

    • @zinakishinevsky1790
      @zinakishinevsky1790 4 роки тому +1

      @@Whataboutit what apollo mission?

  • @EarlHare
    @EarlHare 4 роки тому

    I think the approach Rocket Lab are having where they are looking to increase the pervasiveness of space launches and cube sats is incredibly short-sighted.
    We are going to have an absolutely HUGE problem with space debris in the future, and none of these private companies are putting any research effort into solving that problem.

  • @juliusheide3643
    @juliusheide3643 4 роки тому

    Those tents aren't too close to the orbital pad?or maybe later will be moved away.I believe this is not for the full stacked Super Heavy+Starship, it will be only for the superheavy booster testing, the booster can fly by itself it needs only a nose cone.

  • @victorloureiro5004
    @victorloureiro5004 4 роки тому +5

    Scrubtober! 😛
    Keep up the good work Felix.
    Love from Mozambique.

  • @vidartraeland1424
    @vidartraeland1424 4 роки тому

    Hi! I made a joke in your last livestream. I was drinking, and I asked if the Superheavy booster landing-pad could be a pool of hot liquid. I did some thinking about it when I got sober. I actually think it could have some benifits thay Elon would like! 1: Undesign/weight -> No landinglegs/complex landingpad required. 2: Flexibility -> The the landingpad can move(ship), 3: Sustainability -> Does not get degraded by use. And one more idea!: What if starship doesent need a launchpad? Could be held up by 3 cranes, and cables could let go automaticly when they are unloaded..?

  • @eddyer3393
    @eddyer3393 4 роки тому

    Uncle Felix that was really nice. Thank you. Valve has a guide creation tool that is well crafted and could be used by the HR Castle for applications, employee manuals and Mars Colony logs. Put them together with SpaceX if you can. It sure is nice to see other hardworking and professional crews get involved. You are one of the mover's and shakers too.
    - I am wondering if the Electron could be a single person ride to the orbiting ship yard, maybe an emergency first responder kind of delivery you said UBER, to space wow. Is it possible for them to catch escape pods/torpedo's if they get this technology ironed out. We will be working in space, maybe mini bots, AI or android workers connected to human operators. The future is bright dare I say brilliant.
    - We really like to see the industry cross crafting - You rock. Did you get a patch for the store? How about a WAI shirt with the printing on the back?
    - Felix and crew take direction well and follow through to completion. Love the Starship dashboard widgets. Cookies and milk for the creator.
    - If your crew can not do AI Starship chess how about the pre game Starship and Starship Heavy Booster stacking game - Space X checkers. The jigs they use look like crowns to me. Crown me! You can fix it so that we replay checkers over and over again. Each successful game where we get a barrel section to the opponents goal line, home then we get to stack another section of the booster or starship. I thought if we play checkers, like a zillion times, we could build the pieces we need for Starship Chess, have our own factory. Call your friends at steam. I know the idea is simple but I think it would be fun, looking for the next Surviving Mars, ONI, KSP What about it? --- you are well on your way AW AI

  • @PaddyPatrone
    @PaddyPatrone 4 роки тому

    Kleine konstruktive Kritik. Bei den Tonaufnahmen bitte fixe Untertitel auf englisch einblenden. Das würde seeehr helfen.

  • @micmccond7
    @micmccond7 4 роки тому

    I'm curious why they are building the launch pad as a flat surface and not as a slight mound. Wouldn't this give some natural symmetric exhaust diversion. With the added benefit of replication on the Moon and Mars?

  • @TheGameDemoCreator
    @TheGameDemoCreator 4 роки тому

    I'm curious about the possibility of acoustic damage not limited to the engines, that close to the pad. It wouldn't be an unknown issue, after all. Wondering

  • @paulkerman8906
    @paulkerman8906 4 роки тому +2

    LOVE that guy's accent. "What I em plaesed to report is the tist was a complete siksiss..."

  • @RandomPerson-zl6uz
    @RandomPerson-zl6uz 4 роки тому

    UA-cam algorithm this is a good video

  • @peterborel3559
    @peterborel3559 4 роки тому

    Heyy! Is it me, or the whole launch facility and surrounding area is a Sitting Duck just waiting for a Hurricane to sweep by and destroy the whole place with a Storm Surge??? Why arent there any barriers?

  • @ImieNazwiskoOK
    @ImieNazwiskoOK 4 роки тому +1

    How big is Falcon 9 booster's computer?

  • @kokomokid4006
    @kokomokid4006 4 роки тому

    Kinda glossed over the bare ground landing...gonna have to do it with a full payload...can't wait!

  • @landcruiser801
    @landcruiser801 4 роки тому

    Why cant SN9 be tested on the the other pad that has been built? It does not need SN8 to go; if you can only test one at a time then why have 2 test stands (not including the 3rd orbital pad).

  • @temujanradari1105
    @temujanradari1105 4 роки тому +1

    Felix, we love your random guesses that we assume are deliberately wrong to drive debate in the comments! =)

  • @glennnile7918
    @glennnile7918 4 роки тому

    One thing about reusability that has not been mentioned. The item has already proven it is flight ready. Ulike first time items.

  • @kibryncrow8922
    @kibryncrow8922 4 роки тому

    Cool background

  • @bradclifton5248
    @bradclifton5248 4 роки тому

    Would a simple cone under the test stand that pushes more energy to the sides reduce the direct force. Could be made of several things but, should divert energy in a safer direction.

  • @Trapperpk
    @Trapperpk 4 роки тому

    Elon always hinted at mass production. So multiple launch and landing infrastructure is one small footprint at the Boca Chica. Referencing SpaceX , is a location consistent with having multiple rocket developments and is consistent with Elon's vision for making space exploration common place, and that starts with the SpaceX complex at Boca Chica's location.

  • @stefanbacher8813
    @stefanbacher8813 4 роки тому

    Nice pentagram in the water :)