These YouTubers just RUINED their career...

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 20 кві 2024
  • The UA-cam channel WATCHER just announced they are leaving the platform and instead streaming their own streaming service where they will be charging fans to view their content...
    [CREDITS]
    [Music] www.purple-planet.com
    [Music] Kevin Macleod
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 1,2 тис.

  • @momokunn
    @momokunn 13 днів тому +3081

    They left buzzfeed just to become buzzfeed themselves

    • @katieartist94
      @katieartist94 13 днів тому +230

      I saw a comment on Twitter that said “you can take the boys out of Buzzfeed but you can’t take Buzzfeed out of the boys.” 💀 Sad but true💀

    • @isabelladeltigre2955
      @isabelladeltigre2955 13 днів тому +98

      You either die a hero or live long enough to become the villain 😔

    • @my0freedome
      @my0freedome 12 днів тому +7

      Why did they move from buzzfeed if u can’t afford your own content!

    • @DavidKen878
      @DavidKen878 9 днів тому +1

      @@my0freedome Tell me you’re a child without telling me you’re a child.

  • @hifibeef
    @hifibeef 13 днів тому +4976

    People are tired of paying for 900 subscriptions

    • @ghoultooth
      @ghoultooth 13 днів тому +147

      It’s essentially just cable TV at this point

    • @ooitscherry6851
      @ooitscherry6851 13 днів тому +151

      and god forbid you share an account

    • @KarlHamilton
      @KarlHamilton 13 днів тому +2

      901

    • @ChBoiiDangP
      @ChBoiiDangP 13 днів тому +27

      They literally have a service you can subscribe to so you can make sure you’re not subscribed to things.

    • @vianeygierut4944
      @vianeygierut4944 12 днів тому +20

      At this point, I’m paying the cable prices for all of the streaming platforms that I have.

  • @crazyinnocentturtle
    @crazyinnocentturtle 13 днів тому +2100

    Why didnt they just do a UA-cam membership

    • @norwaytoday
      @norwaytoday 13 днів тому +157

      Because UA-cam takes a 30% cut from the membership revenue... This way, they probably get to keep all the money to themselves...

    • @sierrarae1316
      @sierrarae1316 13 днів тому +141

      ​@@norwaytoday 30% 😱 that's CRIMINAL

    • @halfpine9952
      @halfpine9952 13 днів тому +9

      maximize profits

    • @trishamarie
      @trishamarie 13 днів тому

      @@norwaytodayit’s actually 48% because they also take the US taxes that UA-cam has to pay for themselves out of the creator’s cut. A lot of channels are being demonitized for reused content AKA commentary on other videos, and they said they may not even reapply because of the huge cut YT takes. One spilled the beans and told us it’s 48% total.

    • @gwentz23
      @gwentz23 12 днів тому

      @@sierrarae1316twitch takes 50% from anyone that isn’t partnered. plus i think (someone correct me if i’m wrong!) you can choose the subscription price on youtube? possibly? versus all the tiers on twitch are set prices. 30% is really good within the streaming industry

  • @xMorganbrittnyx
    @xMorganbrittnyx 13 днів тому +3272

    This sucks. I love them... But I'm not buying another streaming service.

    • @VandalSauvage
      @VandalSauvage 13 днів тому +59

      Same. They couldn’t have made a more horrible business decision.

    • @amelie983.
      @amelie983. 13 днів тому +29

      Agreed. Yes, I'm upset but I wish them nothing but success going forward

    • @SB-ht2uy
      @SB-ht2uy 12 днів тому +5

      Maybe they will become the next netflix lol

    • @POV18
      @POV18 12 днів тому +3

      Exactly. Looks like I'll be binging their old shit cause nah lol

    • @Antisocietyrules91
      @Antisocietyrules91 12 днів тому +1

      This 100%!

  • @Eszti2000
    @Eszti2000 13 днів тому +4660

    The way they speak about leaving UA-cam makes it sound like they are forced to quit. Like come on, no one is making them do this. At least be honest about why you are leaving

    • @tofuwiener
      @tofuwiener 13 днів тому +156

      no literally i was just thinking the same thing, the way they spoke was a little dramatic lmao

    • @addy5572
      @addy5572 13 днів тому +56

      I wonder if they had come to the end of a five year investment plan, time to pay up.

    • @KTannerPaisleyKK
      @KTannerPaisleyKK 13 днів тому +41

      Tubers who do this always come back. People like free most of us are poor😢

    • @foxesofautumn
      @foxesofautumn 13 днів тому +66

      All that stuff about appealing to advertisers… really? Has that ever been a problem for them? They’re a safe bet. They don’t do controversial stuff and haven’t expressed an interest in that.

    • @lalailm
      @lalailm 12 днів тому +17

      Did you hear them talking about how the costs are exceeding the revenue? What do you suggest they do? Suck it up? Stop paying employees? Settle for crappy, unoriginal and low production content, which is literally what is flooding on youtube today? What if they dont want to uninspired and uncreative work? And why should they feel guilty for wanting fair compensation for good work?
      I swear, the same people who complain about them being clueless for asking people to pay for their content bc 5,99 is a lot for some, are the same ones who dont WANT to take a moment and look at their side.
      Also no one is making YOU sign their platform. By they still have to find a way to pay their bills

  • @bbkeons
    @bbkeons 13 днів тому +4484

    And yet, they still have a full patreon, where the highest tier is $100/month?!?!?

    • @zivens.2407
      @zivens.2407 13 днів тому +402

      And Patrons don't get free subs to the new service. Just 40% off

    • @kristenclark82
      @kristenclark82 13 днів тому +205

      It’s giving greedy for sure

    • @Thenerdinyourclass
      @Thenerdinyourclass 13 днів тому

      @@zivens.2407it’s actually only 10% off as the sale price is 30% off

    • @dalishrogue3621
      @dalishrogue3621 13 днів тому

      @@zivens.2407ouch!

    • @libriansana8562
      @libriansana8562 13 днів тому +67

      Seems like Every youtuber has a patreon now... 😑

  • @savanahmaestas7663
    @savanahmaestas7663 13 днів тому +3169

    Why would anyone pay for the exact same content and no incentives. Career death

    • @CesarDraigcyfail
      @CesarDraigcyfail 13 днів тому +31

      Because they mentioned something about taking their old stuff off of UA-cam and putting it behind the paywall too.

    • @Seafairi
      @Seafairi 13 днів тому +83

      ​@@CesarDraigcyfail really? This feels like a slap to the face as a long time fan of theirs

    • @KTannerPaisleyKK
      @KTannerPaisleyKK 13 днів тому +8

      They should create their own UA-cam. We need free speech

    • @RuminatingRaptor
      @RuminatingRaptor 13 днів тому +10

      @@CesarDraigcyfail
      They didn't say that. They are leaving their old content on UA-cam.

    • @RuminatingRaptor
      @RuminatingRaptor 13 днів тому +12

      @@KTannerPaisleyKK
      You obviously don't know what free speech means. lol And if you think Watcher wouldn't have rules, you are wrong.

  • @melancholic_ghostsss
    @melancholic_ghostsss 13 днів тому +2527

    They originally tried to take down all their UA-cam content, but quickly went nooooOOOOoooo we're keeping it up, you guys just heard wrong💀

    • @pensivesoprano1637
      @pensivesoprano1637 13 днів тому +207

      Yeah, I was so confused about that. I 100% heard that they were going to take down all their streaming content and put it on their paid service. And then all of a sudden that's not the case anymore?

    • @melancholic_ghostsss
      @melancholic_ghostsss 13 днів тому +235

      @@pensivesoprano1637 They even said it in a variety article. They just took it back once everyone was mad about it and made it sound like they were never going to do that in the first place. This whole situation is going to be interesting considering they have a tour coming up in Europe👀

    • @tomatosoup4618
      @tomatosoup4618 13 днів тому +162

      And the way Ryan was basically like, "I know people have been hearing rumors that we're taking all out catalog down..." NOT RUMOR

    • @melancholic_ghostsss
      @melancholic_ghostsss 13 днів тому

      @@tomatosoup4618 EXAAACCTTTLLYYYY

    • @pensivesoprano1637
      @pensivesoprano1637 13 днів тому +39

      @@melancholic_ghostsss oh, wow! Thanks for validating me, I was feeling crazy 😅 Is there a link to the Variety article?

  • @tonitonibb
    @tonitonibb 13 днів тому +2204

    never would I ever think that the day where The Ghoul Boys would be on Tea Spill... but I agree with the mass, this is a really shitty move that seems extremely thought out and not at all at the same time...

    • @sandras2624
      @sandras2624 13 днів тому +28

      Yeah this is so disappointing and weird

    • @user-bl7kg7tj1c
      @user-bl7kg7tj1c 12 днів тому +6

      Same :(

    • @_TSC_46
      @_TSC_46 12 днів тому +5

      Really sucks I hate what’s happening

    • @steph15036
      @steph15036 12 днів тому +1

      dude same it’s like worlds colliding in the worst way 😔

  • @katieartist94
    @katieartist94 13 днів тому +1788

    I’ve followed them since their first Buzzfeed unsolved video, and I’m SHOCKED! They’d be the last company I’d expect to do this… they shot themselves in the foot and now their silence is deafening.

    • @dubyabalthazar4598
      @dubyabalthazar4598 13 днів тому +11

      Eh, who cares... ppl are gonna pay it or not. Then they'll make the appropriate shifts...it's up to their audience to show their vote by not paying

    • @hoziersexual
      @hoziersexual 13 днів тому +2

      Same!

    • @Chris-jn5gr
      @Chris-jn5gr 12 днів тому +41

      @@dubyabalthazar4598 reputation with ur fans is INSANELY important when it comes to branding and having a future as content creators. Saying "who cares" just shows how much ur missing the point of this almost unanimous backlash (a very hard thing to accomplish on the internet btw lmaoooo)

    • @baronvg
      @baronvg 12 днів тому +4

      Really? I guess my cynicism never let me get attached because I’m not even in the slightest bit surprised by any of this.

    • @TheGamer2001
      @TheGamer2001 11 днів тому +2

      I have seen them get more and more greedy watching them taking more and more irresponsible sponsorships, so, this was not such a big surprise for me.

  • @neutralman9124
    @neutralman9124 13 днів тому +1728

    Under 3million subscribers is nowhere near enough for this to be viable and their announcement having just under 200k dislikes is wild. They've ruined their careers.

    • @lisalasers
      @lisalasers 12 днів тому +43

      pretty sure colby still edits sam and colby’s videos. they have over 10m subscribers

    • @swancorpse
      @swancorpse 12 днів тому +6

      @@lisalasers i love those kansas boys so bad

    • @JenneeAmell
      @JenneeAmell 12 днів тому +20

      They’ve also been bleeding subscribers. Almost 100k so far.

    • @alyssaohnstad2169
      @alyssaohnstad2169 12 днів тому

      ​@engie3231 there was a browser extension (i think that's what it's called) on Google Chrome where you can see UA-cam dislikes. Not sure if it's still available

    • @jackcollinsmartin4210
      @jackcollinsmartin4210 12 днів тому +8

      ​@JenneeAmell Oh no, far more than that. Before the video was posted, they had over 3 mil. So yeah, oof 😂

  • @vulgaritar48
    @vulgaritar48 13 днів тому +957

    Just to nitpick, but it was Ryan and Shane who spent years building up a loyal supportive fanbase willing to follow them off Buzzfeed. I don't know who that other guy is.

    • @rezhaadriantanuharja3389
      @rezhaadriantanuharja3389 13 днів тому +121

      Steven Lim was quite popular with the hit series “Worth It”. However, his partner from the show didn’t join The Watcher and his personality in the new channel is the complete opposite of what he showed in Buzzfeed

    • @hoziersexual
      @hoziersexual 13 днів тому +12

      ​@@rezhaadriantanuharja3389pretty sure he recently did (don't remember his same, sorry).

    • @knitwitchpgh
      @knitwitchpgh 12 днів тому +56

      Facts. Steven has/had his following but MOST people followed for shane and Ryan

    • @Akihiko-senpai
      @Akihiko-senpai 12 днів тому +16

      @@rezhaadriantanuharja3389 it was andrew right? And also adam?

    • @daniethegirl029
      @daniethegirl029 12 днів тому +1

      10000%

  • @elineclaeys8226
    @elineclaeys8226 13 днів тому +1031

    Remember when there was the Try Guys Ned scandal and we all were praising Shane, Ryan and Steven for being unproblematic...
    Sigh

    • @localabsurdist6661
      @localabsurdist6661 12 днів тому

      Apparently Steven is also homophobic and racist…

    • @Miyawakiss
      @Miyawakiss 12 днів тому +54

      To be fair, that scandal is still way worse than this. But yeah, feels like they've betrayed their fans and loyal audience

    • @DankSouls37
      @DankSouls37 12 днів тому +37

      And the try guys handled it far better lol

    • @carlyb7870
      @carlyb7870 12 днів тому +13

      It’s literally just a subscription service. No part of this is problematic. They need consistent money to produce the content we want, a subscription service makes more sense. No part of that is scandalous or problematic 😂

    • @RedGreyV
      @RedGreyV 12 днів тому +7

      Don't praise anybody you don't know for anything and you will never be disappointed.

  • @KyleWoolridgeGrant
    @KyleWoolridgeGrant 13 днів тому +655

    If they are really set on producing high-budget content and it truly isn't affordable to them, they should have pitched their show to an existing streaming service. Expecting people to pay $6 a month to be able to watch one show is just silly.

    • @doomedjane
      @doomedjane 12 днів тому +16

      It very well could be a rumor but I saw someone mention Ryan had talked about this on their podcast how he had talked to a studio about this and they might have replaced him if he went through with it so he didn't pursue that

  • @AmeliaMastervally
    @AmeliaMastervally 13 днів тому +831

    Watcher on Tea spill? The crossover I literally never wanted but I'm getting 😢👍

    • @emmagray134
      @emmagray134 12 днів тому +2

      I felt the same way when the Try Guys tea was on here 😭

  • @kandisowens1880
    @kandisowens1880 13 днів тому +1588

    I truly blame steven. He's apparently the ceo now
    Edit: Thanks for the likes, you guys! I made this post in haste, and I also blame Shane and Ryan. Also, there is a funny update; they made an update video on the watcher channel backtracking (a little) lol

    • @waterpoptarts9740
      @waterpoptarts9740 13 днів тому +124

      steven always seemed quite nice and it's a shame (if he was the one that decided this) they went through with it

    • @kandisowens1880
      @kandisowens1880 13 днів тому +88

      @waterpoptarts9740 I thought the same, but my opinion soured when I started listening to their podcast

    • @waterpoptarts9740
      @waterpoptarts9740 13 днів тому

      ​@@kandisowens1880they have a podcast? I didnt realise😭 what kind of things did he say?

    • @sarar4270
      @sarar4270 13 днів тому +117

      @@kandisowens1880 oh i heard something about that podcast. he canceled it and admitted to being friends with racists and homophobes? is that right or wrong info?

    • @ghoultooth
      @ghoultooth 13 днів тому +231

      @@waterpoptarts9740I always had a dislike for him, not sure why but he always seemed kinda jealous about the success of Shane and Ryan. Not just that, no one really gave a rat’s ass about his food videos yet he still insisted on pumping them out and spending the funds on them

  • @originalbk
    @originalbk 12 днів тому +269

    Somebody commented under their Instagram post about this with, "Maybe the demons were Ryan and Shane all along." RIP.

    • @cornpeal8945
      @cornpeal8945 12 днів тому +13

      Lmao that’s kind of a dramatic statement-but I do feel sad they are leaving UA-cam. Sad for them and what they have built. I don’t see them having a strong future after this. Hopefully they can just go back to YT one day again…

    • @Balletified
      @Balletified 12 днів тому +14

      Another commenter: “the boos in the comments might actually prove ghosts exist”

  • @MissPinkElf13
    @MissPinkElf13 13 днів тому +316

    Pirating is always morally correct

  • @cee8ch
    @cee8ch 13 днів тому +143

    buzzfeed collapsed because of overhiring and mismanagement of funds. just sucks to see that they didn’t learn from their old employer’s mistakes.

  • @ko.8742
    @ko.8742 13 днів тому +314

    200k subs lost, 170k dislikes, 71k+ comments, none of these so far are positive on their side. Content creators should be reminded that being greedy will have a concequence.

    • @Meocross
      @Meocross 13 днів тому +41

      I am just WAITING for them to disable comments and hide dislikes just like every pathetic loser that could not be happy with their cake and eat it.

    • @ko.8742
      @ko.8742 13 днів тому +15

      @@Meocross They were brave for having their comments off to start with.

    • @hoziersexual
      @hoziersexual 13 днів тому +8

      Most of the comments are people saying they're either students and/or can't afford it.

    • @staytuned2L337
      @staytuned2L337 13 днів тому

      ​@@Meocross(they already are.)

    • @zoedunn2140
      @zoedunn2140 12 днів тому

      Because y’all are just broke and want everybody else to be too

  • @elineclaeys8226
    @elineclaeys8226 13 днів тому +481

    And don't forget they wanted to remove all the old content from UA-cam!
    The decision was quickly rolled back/denied but in the video it very much sounds like that was the original plan.

    • @ooitscherry6851
      @ooitscherry6851 13 днів тому +32

      that feels so cash grabby

    • @celestia486
      @celestia486 13 днів тому +20

      Wow.. so we wouldn’t have their past entertainment anymore? Yeah just forget all those years the fans made you who you are today just erase it that’s fine 😑

    • @perryrhinitis
      @perryrhinitis 13 днів тому +9

      It's heinous how they wanted to charge for videos that we've been watching for free for years

    • @jbw3624
      @jbw3624 12 днів тому

      ​@@perryrhinitis heinous really? 😂

  • @user-bi3vi2wx8x2
    @user-bi3vi2wx8x2 13 днів тому +556

    They called us poor, broke up with us, said they used us as a rung in a corporate ladder and basically said they're stepping on us for the last time pushing us into the ground. I feel sick to my stomach and personally insulted by the video.

    • @Meocross
      @Meocross 13 днів тому

      Speak with your mouse and with your wallet, these gremlins do not deserve your viewership anymore or your money.

    • @magicchirp1714
      @magicchirp1714 13 днів тому +23

      Even if they do come back to I don't think it will be like before.

    • @CainP
      @CainP 13 днів тому +3

      It's only Steven that called us that

    • @jknight9487
      @jknight9487 12 днів тому +7

      That was a painfully accurate description of everything. 😶

    • @Allie-x222
      @Allie-x222 12 днів тому +14

      @@magicchirp1714exactly, like the whole thing left a bad taste in my mouth. It’s just so unexpected and disappointing from a group of people whose values seemed to be the very opposite of this decision, that mind you, they sought no guidance or feedback on from their audience. As many people have said, a simple YT/instagram poll would’ve saved them from this awful decision.

  • @redcoffeez
    @redcoffeez 13 днів тому +1270

    shane and ryan blink twice if you need help

    • @TRE3URE
      @TRE3URE 13 днів тому +3

      Who's Ryan and Shane I'm new idk

    • @ImCedReacts
      @ImCedReacts 13 днів тому +145

      They're owners. Lim may be CEO but the move doesn't happen unless they approve. They're equally to blame. They made their bed, they can lay in it.

    • @gbaleebaker2198
      @gbaleebaker2198 13 днів тому +4

      *blink, blink*

    • @anasdyanee
      @anasdyanee 13 днів тому +106

      ​@@ImCedReactsagreed. I'm so sick of people blaming only Steven. I don't even like him; the only reason they're babying Ryan and Shane is because they feel a connection to them. Most people subscribe to Watcher because of them so they see Steven as this big bad villain. Just a reminder, they're all co-founders. Even if they voted, they needed 2 of them to agree for the decision to be made.

    • @mechanicalthephantomonial7757
      @mechanicalthephantomonial7757 13 днів тому +3

      I thought you were talking about shane dawson and ryan adams 😂

  • @bonsthoughts
    @bonsthoughts 13 днів тому +325

    they got fans all around the world (japan here) like do they also not realize this new platform wont be available to some of us :(

    • @pimduay
      @pimduay 13 днів тому +34

      Ikr, we basically forced to "deal with it" I feel so betrayed😢

    • @bonsthoughts
      @bonsthoughts 13 днів тому +8

      ⁠​⁠​⁠@@pimduayexactly!! no warning or anything, just dropped it out of nowhere ;-;

    • @bonsthoughts
      @bonsthoughts 13 днів тому +35

      also, IN THIS ECONOMY??😭

    • @pimduay
      @pimduay 13 днів тому +37

      @@bonsthoughtsYES! Such a slap in the face, did they forgot that's no subscriber = no money?
      And in third world country $5.99 isn't even minimum wage per day!
      "Every one can afford" is purely delusional

    • @Meocross
      @Meocross 13 днів тому

      You really think idiots swimming in money still have any braincells left? At this point they want enough money to buy hookers, cars and cocaine.

  • @sweetlikebubblegum_
    @sweetlikebubblegum_ 13 днів тому +570

    they need a better marketing team

    • @Disre.damn.spectful
      @Disre.damn.spectful 13 днів тому +52

      AND CEO and financial team

    • @perryrhinitis
      @perryrhinitis 13 днів тому +11

      @@Disre.damn.spectful Steven is their CEO 💀💀

    • @sarahm.8013
      @sarahm.8013 13 днів тому +17

      do they even have one... most of their employees are friends and family, i doubt the majority knows a thing about stuff like this or has a fitting degree

    • @lisalasers
      @lisalasers 12 днів тому +3

      i’m laughing because how are they gonna market this streaming service? come buy our content even though most of our fans didn’t

    • @Gr95dc
      @Gr95dc 12 днів тому +3

      @@sarahm.8013 oh don't we love nepotism? the thing that generates the most innovation (lol)

  • @amarikiera
    @amarikiera 13 днів тому +267

    its so sad considering they literally make so much from patreon already…

  • @kisshufan4ever
    @kisshufan4ever 13 днів тому +430

    We came for them not the high quality they could film it in a shed and we'd still watch. It'd just a kick in the teeth for the people who have been loyal since the buzzfeed days.

  • @southpark228
    @southpark228 13 днів тому +105

    This is the most Buzzfeed thing they’ve done since leaving Buzzfeed

  • @shinee-shawol
    @shinee-shawol 13 днів тому +405

    I was waiting for you to cover this. The whole situation is so gross. It's overflowing with greed.
    Edit: penguinz0 even did a cost breakdown estimate of their channel, and it's truly just ... there's literally no good reason for this. Been a fan of them since Buzzfeed but this immeadietly destroyed that love and support after all this time.

    • @tomatosoup4618
      @tomatosoup4618 13 днів тому +27

      Honestly, Steven is the culprit. I feel it. He hired his friends to make a version of Worth It when people only liked that show because BuzzFeed (a corporation) is paying for it. Now they want fans to do that for them?

    • @perryrhinitis
      @perryrhinitis 13 днів тому

      @@tomatosoup4618 nobody wants to see them wine & dine on the peoples' dime
      I watch Jolly and they've occasionally done international food tours and Michelin Star food reviews but I don't recall having to pay for all of that lol how come they could do it?

    • @kosherpenguin
      @kosherpenguin 13 днів тому +7

      Ooh, gonna check out that penguinz0 video next. Thanks!

    • @tangerinesandvaseline9415
      @tangerinesandvaseline9415 12 днів тому +2

      we must watch the same people lol i was gonna comment the same thing

    • @CapucineNighly
      @CapucineNighly 12 днів тому +1

      Ya, Charlie did a good breakdown. Dood has more employees and other side businesses going on and can still pay them all without paywalling his vids on youtube. And he'e more well known with more subs. Man it's just pure greed

  • @mayaflici374
    @mayaflici374 13 днів тому +232

    I think they just forgot why people tuned in and listened to their own vision too much.
    Not a lot of people subscribed to Watcher for Steven's series. The fact that his series looks the most expensive to produce just because he wants to try expensive food got people angry.
    On top of the "everyone can afford this" statement, because let's remember it's 5,99$ USD for 4 monthly videos

  • @bulkvanderhuge9006
    @bulkvanderhuge9006 13 днів тому +56

    They "have" to pay $1000 so Steve can eat a steak with gold foil on it.

  • @jocelynkaulitz
    @jocelynkaulitz 13 днів тому +93

    Bruh peacock costs 7.99 and it has waaaaay more features. They’re overcharging for sure.

  • @addy5572
    @addy5572 13 днів тому +135

    Saw a comment that said something to the effect of "i wonder if steven pitched a 5 year investment plan, and now that time is up and they need to pay out" increasingly that feels true.

  • @alexusmartinez4123
    @alexusmartinez4123 13 днів тому +262

    I’ve been watching Ryan & Shane since their Buzzfeed days. Unfortunately I won’t be “following them this one last time”. They really shot themselves in the foot with this business decision.

  • @ghoultooth
    @ghoultooth 13 днів тому +232

    Never like Steven and I wholeheartedly think he pushed for this. Especially because Shane has been vocal about disliking companies that do this. They don’t seem to grasp we enjoyed the simple comedy from Shane and Ryan, not the production quality

    • @ia490
      @ia490 13 днів тому +54

      Seems like Shane sold out though 😐

    • @knxa
      @knxa 12 днів тому

      ​​@@ia490Shane's wife ( Sara rubin) commented on Tumblr basically defending their decision so that goes on to show that both Ryan and shane were on board with this decision if Shane wasn't, his wife wouldn't have defended them.
      Not to mention, Ryan has always talked about making TV calibre content so, yea they're all grown men.

    • @paigew6707
      @paigew6707 12 днів тому +13

      Yes, Steven is the sole CEO, he handles the money and business side so that Shane and Ryan can handle the content. they revealed this on their podcast. I can’t stand Steven, never ever liked him.

    • @kokoko900
      @kokoko900 11 днів тому

      Nobody liked steven honestly

  • @pankreas2195
    @pankreas2195 13 днів тому +91

    If they wanna be Netflix level of quality, they should pitch their show to Netflix, not try to become a streaming service without having nearly as much appeal

  • @Etherealzyo
    @Etherealzyo 13 днів тому +229

    Greed is a terrible thing

  • @Breadsticks111
    @Breadsticks111 13 днів тому +88

    I am one of the people who only followed Watcher for Shane and Ryan. Their friendship was comedic but also endearing. I loved the simplicity of Buzzfeed Unsolved. Ghost Files is good but all the extra stuff is unnecessary in my opinion. Their chemistry was the magic.

  • @darksideofthemood
    @darksideofthemood 12 днів тому +16

    I noticed that when UA-camrs start doing " tv worthy" content people start leaving. No one wants that but the UA-camrs and their dream of grandeur.

  • @Ann-zj8nh
    @Ann-zj8nh 13 днів тому +72

    I was broken up with and insulted for being broke by my favorite channel lol. Loved the guys but honestly even if they backtrack and return to UA-cam I don't know if I'll come back...

    • @franzimaff3473
      @franzimaff3473 13 днів тому +9

      I absolutely relate to your sentiment... even if they apologise and decide to backtrack, I can't bring myself to watch them ever again. They broke all our trust its just unforgivable, in my opinion.

    • @caithenry8429
      @caithenry8429 12 днів тому +2

      Not after they tried to act like their plan wasn't to move all content behind a payway before the summer. That was the icing on the cake for me to unsubcribe.

  • @aespinkmoon
    @aespinkmoon 13 днів тому +130

    Never heard of them, but since the start of the video I was thinking “haven’t they heard of Patreon” only to find out they already have one 😭 clearly they also need to start paying a PR team as well

  • @BewareOfMpreg
    @BewareOfMpreg 13 днів тому +82

    When Rooster Teeth attempted to do the same with 40 million subscribers, they failed. The fact that they saw Rooster Teeth crash and burn, and still have enough arrogance to think that they would somehow manage to make this work is crazy. Was it the greed? Did they think that their fans would continue to be loyal after being called poor? 🙄

  • @aquari22
    @aquari22 13 днів тому +52

    They really thought going to World Tour, eating expensive food, and buying luxurious products out of our struggling af pocket was a good idea. 💀

  • @hhenry68
    @hhenry68 13 днів тому +105

    I really appreciated the link to the Try Guys and watching their TryPod over their main videos because I am the same way. I much prefer the dynamic between cast members in videos over high production rates

    • @TeaSpill
      @TeaSpill  13 днів тому +20

      Especially when they do the episodes in public!! Could easily watch for hours

  • @kisshufan4ever
    @kisshufan4ever 13 днів тому +193

    It's the fact that if your not American you can't get the content paid or un paid which really annoys me not to mention they already had a patreon.

    • @waterpoptarts9740
      @waterpoptarts9740 13 днів тому +3

      why not? that's so annoying 💔

    • @ghoultooth
      @ghoultooth 13 днів тому

      @@waterpoptarts9740I imagine the website is blocked in some countries, not just that but $5.99 is quite a lot when converted into local currency for a lot of people. Someone on the original video stated that in their currency, $5.99 would be a week’s worth of groceries

    • @jinxingxuelang
      @jinxingxuelang 13 днів тому +5

      they had patreon as well as youtube membership

    • @TheGoosebumpsGirl
      @TheGoosebumpsGirl 13 днів тому

      @@waterpoptarts9740many streaming services only work in certain countries or have different content depending on the country. I think Hulu only exists in America, and it would likely be significantly more expensive for them to make their service worldwide vs just in the US

    • @crying2emoji5
      @crying2emoji5 13 днів тому +2

      I had no idea that was the case!!! That is seriously screwed up

  • @raeseph
    @raeseph 13 днів тому +59

    genuinely like WHO is making their financial decisions? who is advising them? why are they not budgeting at ALL with what they have? out of the 25 employees they have PLEASE TELL ME THEY HAVE A DECENT ACCOUNTANT !!!!!

  • @mollyapteros
    @mollyapteros 13 днів тому +27

    The comments under their video are savage. These guys are wealthy influencers who have become so out of touch and now the people are done. Fumbled the bag big time.

    • @MemoriesofOctober
      @MemoriesofOctober 12 днів тому

      I saw it in Real Time 😂It was all Facts and the Comments were RAW!!

    • @rachellee.9389
      @rachellee.9389 10 днів тому

      Geez, I hope they don't 'influence' (and I can't say that word without mentally twirling my hair and saying, "I'm an INFLUENCER" amidst the sound of bubble gum cracking and popping) their subbies to crash & burn as horribly as they did.

  • @perryrhinitis
    @perryrhinitis 13 днів тому +34

    They could've done a simple poll about this and found out nobody wants another Netflix but only their stuff in it.

    • @rachellee.9389
      @rachellee.9389 10 днів тому +2

      This whole debacle was not about what we subbies wanted, it was about the money those narcissistic, big-headed losers wanted without working for it.

  • @Faye-vr6jc
    @Faye-vr6jc 13 днів тому +65

    the biggest comparison to this is GMM it has ALWAYS been free, it has always been focused on youtbe and the mythical society is OPTIONAL and not being subscribed to it doesnt makeme feel like i miss out on any rhett and link content

    • @onceyouwheeinyoucantwheeout
      @onceyouwheeinyoucantwheeout 12 днів тому +7

      My favorite UA-camrs. They know how to budget, manage and keep their fans entertained without doing greedy sht like other UA-cam channels. Watcher was one of my favorites but now they’re meh to me

    • @witchassbitch3
      @witchassbitch3 12 днів тому +2

      Exactly this. And I feel like smosh and the try guys do a pretty good job emulating that strategy in their own ways. There’s just so many other ways they could have approached this.

    • @genericname1622
      @genericname1622 12 днів тому +5

      I love them because they also used their resources to save channels from Defy, biggest one being Smosh. Seems a really chill company.

  • @beekay1137
    @beekay1137 13 днів тому +102

    "The you left youtube" such a true statement
    Never thought id see them here

  • @BakaPai
    @BakaPai 12 днів тому +25

    Imagine being a patron member and being told your subscription isn't lucrative enough.

    • @kaytea0963
      @kaytea0963 12 днів тому

      Exactly! Or buying merchandise over the years. Feels weird wearing my watcher gear now when I used to love the conversations that came up when people recognized the logos on the street.

  • @cherry_top
    @cherry_top 12 днів тому +37

    The thing that gets me is Dropout is the same price as Watcher. Dropout I’ve been subscribed to for over a year and a half and I have watched hundreds of hours of content and still have a backlog of things to watch- and there is new content coming every week. It is absolutely worth the money bc of the sheer amount of quality content they are producing. Watcher doesn’t have that- and by them not having that/ also not announcing what NEW series they will bring to the table, it’s really hard to make an informed choice on if buying it will be good. It also really rubs me the wrong way that they are removing all the previously free shows. This whole move stinks of greed and entitlement tbh :((

    • @caithenry8429
      @caithenry8429 12 днів тому +4

      And dropout still posts on UA-cam!

    • @zootchs.8991
      @zootchs.8991 12 днів тому +7

      I've been comparing this move to Dropout over and over again in my head, because I am a Dropout Fan. They don't have the depth of content, they don't have the budget friendly setup, they don't have any of the keys that makes Dropout a success while others who try this same approach utterly fail.

    • @guardianofcreativity4860
      @guardianofcreativity4860 10 днів тому

      I was thinking the same thing! Dropout is the only subscription service I have. There’s so much content, it’s all high quality entertainment, and they freshen things up with entirely new shows on occasion as well.

  • @AnoukiMorgenstern
    @AnoukiMorgenstern 13 днів тому +60

    I kinda stopped watching them when their stuff got too professional and well produced. We dont need fancy sets and setups, all we need is 2 dudes on a couch, filming themselves with their phone. I mean...there's a reason why I prefer youtube over TV ;;

    • @IvyHale151
      @IvyHale151 12 днів тому +3

      The more it was produced the less fun was being had. Ryan didn't even take the ghost hunting seriously anymore. What is even the point.

    • @kaytea0963
      @kaytea0963 12 днів тому +1

      I've felt like it's become more scripted as the production level has increased. Ryan and Shane frequently look off screen after being asked questions about whats on the cork board/Projector/etc. or even just a detail about the story they're sharing and they have no clue. Like they are given a script and don't actually read or look up the stories themselves anymore.

  • @VandalSauvage
    @VandalSauvage 13 днів тому +50

    I’m sure we were all thinking “Wait, is this a joke?” when we saw the title of their video. Ugh, such a dick move. I’ve supported these guys for years now but I’m not going to financially support them to enable their own shitty business decisions.

    • @Meocross
      @Meocross 13 днів тому

      This reminds me of kickstarter, i basically threw that site away once it turned into a money laundering platform, and these idiots think we have time for this shit?

  • @waterpoptarts9740
    @waterpoptarts9740 13 днів тому +114

    I haven't watched them in a while but this still makes me so sad, I get that there's a high cost of living atm but this still feels really bad. even the "unproblematic" youtubers seem to almost always end up doing something like this...
    edit: this channel is great, idk how you're so fast at making these videos haha

  • @adelaide8969
    @adelaide8969 13 днів тому +19

    Even Mr.Beast would get backlash from this. What makes them think they’ll big enough for this to be viable?

    • @petergriffiinbirdistheword
      @petergriffiinbirdistheword 13 днів тому +6

      I am a huge fan but I'm not following them off this platform, especially if I have to pay. I been supporting them for a long time. I'm poor af. They're on their own. 😂

  • @multifandomharlot
    @multifandomharlot 13 днів тому +48

    $5.99USD in my currency is close to $18. That extra $18 could do so much more for me than spending it on a streaming service.

  • @celthric38
    @celthric38 12 днів тому +9

    What's with "TV quality show" obsession? I don't get it. I don't even watch TV nowadays. Netflix yes, but that's more cinematic than TV. Their current content still feels like UA-cam. The good kind of UA-cam video. Maybe just me. Their move doesn't makes sense.

  • @Monica72215
    @Monica72215 13 днів тому +160

    I haven't watched them in a while but this still makes me so sad, I get that there's a high cost of living atm but this still feels really bad. even the \

  • @onceyouwheeinyoucantwheeout
    @onceyouwheeinyoucantwheeout 12 днів тому +15

    The question is what is wrong with patreon that they needed a paywall? It’s highly suspicious that they have 25 employees and complained about not making enough when they rack in at least a million views per video??? They should cut down their employees and look into what they could budget. Majority of us don’t need this quality production sht from them. Their content from the unsolved videos was what made them have a huge audience in the first place… they dun fcked up now… sigh

  • @Dauerglotzer123
    @Dauerglotzer123 13 днів тому +15

    Also, the fact they had a countdown to a big and exciting announcement... And the announcement is a paywall when they post less than weekly on average

  • @jinxingxuelang
    @jinxingxuelang 13 днів тому +36

    imo Steven is absolutely horrible CEO because he seems keener on making himself a big name like Shane and Ryan (like getting his own series on the new platform) than making sure the business thrives and is cost-effective. but it's not like Shane and Ryan had no say in this and i bet that the two could overrule Steven's decision if they wanted

  • @chantellewestlund1182
    @chantellewestlund1182 13 днів тому +36

    I've seen that Steven guy around on YT and always had a funny feeling about him..

    • @wendieghostie
      @wendieghostie 13 днів тому +1

      it's because he's always touted as the business guy, and business people are evil

    • @victoryv116
      @victoryv116 11 днів тому +2

      Yeah because I never liked him ..he always gives this very uncanny mean vibe

  • @Caseycastiels
    @Caseycastiels 13 днів тому +46

    omfg i was waiting for this. It makes me so sad that this is happening. I watched them on buzzfeed unsolved and also on watcher and i have been a long time fan. This is just so unfair honestly like nobody has 5.99.

  • @flyingninja96
    @flyingninja96 13 днів тому +79

    What a shitty move. I’m actually beyond bummed out

  • @crying2emoji5
    @crying2emoji5 13 днів тому +22

    First Charlie, now Tea Spill… if Coffeezilla makes a video about this, then Watcher is truly doomed.

  • @Oohkamitama
    @Oohkamitama 12 днів тому +6

    I actually liked their previous production better. The time when Ryan and Shane was just chilling in a dark room with a mannequin in the background and their text on screen

  • @kugisaki8027
    @kugisaki8027 13 днів тому +55

    never click so fast ( im just bored)

  • @Moonkat143
    @Moonkat143 13 днів тому +37

    I was planning on binging all their stuff when they finished their season and now I can’t 🌝

    • @celestia486
      @celestia486 13 днів тому +2

      I think you should be happy you didn’t binge and wait like I did because I’m very disappointed. Thought clicking on that video could 50/50 be a joke and still get entertained.. that didn’t end up happening

  • @lifekeepsflowing
    @lifekeepsflowing 13 днів тому +44

    I have been a fan of Ryan and Shane since 2016. I followed them from Buzzfeed to Watcher. I even watched their Podwatcher and now it feels like they are abandoning their loyal audience all for more money. The thing is though, I can’t afford it and even if I could I wouldn’t buy it out of principle. $5.99 is not adorable for everyone, they were already making money and had a patreon and now they are being radio silent as their fans are hurting and upset. It’s completely embarrassing and upsetting to see how Watcher is handling this. I truly believe the main person behind this terrible and detrimental business decision is Steven Lim. I thought the ghoul boys were better than this but it’s looking like I was wrong

  • @Cancus746
    @Cancus746 13 днів тому +10

    Also, unless one of them personally built this…they’ve already taken a huge loss on website design. This was such a foolish move.

    • @Squirrel0Ate0My0Head
      @Squirrel0Ate0My0Head 12 днів тому +1

      I've been thinking the same thing, the site looks nice but must have been pretty expensive. And I've already seen some older fans complain that there's no app for Roku or Fire TV or something since most older fans aren't watching on laptops- so they aren't even done sinking costs into the project

  • @kitkatlove89
    @kitkatlove89 13 днів тому +11

    It’s wild because they have Patreon, they have other means of making money without a subscription streaming service. The content doesn’t justify the means of the streaming service they have two specific niches of content and that’s food and scary. At least the Try Guys attempt to diversify their content while finding things that make them money.
    The channel thats most similar to Watcher in terms of production costs is Korean Englishman/Jolly. Their main thing is Korean Culture and Food. They fly out people to Korea multiple times in one year and vice versa to other countries, yet the only thing they’ve done is memberships on YT! They have provided consistent quality videos showing people Korean Culture and them exploring different areas of the world. They’re not struggling with money the way Watcher has..

  • @aehrlynn
    @aehrlynn 13 днів тому +19

    Their thumbnail looks like the Try Guys "What Happened" video 😂

  • @jbshiva865
    @jbshiva865 13 днів тому +18

    If they wanted more pay for their content they don't need to create a whole new streaming platform, there's Nebula for example, you can join a platform that already exists that does better revenue share with the creators and still get your fans to join you.

    • @IvyHale151
      @IvyHale151 12 днів тому

      There is even Flowplain from the Linus Tech Tips guys: also a site that gives more tk creators and won't permaban you without notice.
      They didn't do any research, they decided this and went with it blind

  • @specializedchemicals6669
    @specializedchemicals6669 13 днів тому +26

    we don't need another subscription in a world that even the smallest things that don't need one have one, even if it's for watcher. bad and tone deaf move from them. i'm surprised because shane always seemed to lean to an eat the rich kind of person. many people can't afford to waste that money on something for pleasure and something that doesn't fit as much variety/effort as other streaming services. especially for content that was once free and doesn't need more money put into it because the fan base would still love it if the content was made with dollar store crafts. i loved watching shane and ryan, but this is greed. i'll have to step back from watcher as someone who can't treat themselves to even a drink at a fast food place most of the time.

  • @phreaqueonaleash
    @phreaqueonaleash 13 днів тому +58

    I just... Why couldn't they do both? Release less Yt content, Yt teasers for full length videos?

    • @sillysir2
      @sillysir2 13 днів тому +11

      Isn’t that what Dropout does?

    • @Meocross
      @Meocross 13 днів тому

      How would they make MORE money if they didn't force people to jump to another platform, with the shitty excuse that youtube WITH ZERO PAYMENT GATES unlike online market platforms has become unsustainable.

    • @tomatosoup1304
      @tomatosoup1304 13 днів тому +2

      Right? That's what Pretty Much It does and it makes it so both YT videos and full length videos are enjoyable

  • @whodat1017
    @whodat1017 13 днів тому +21

    Why couldn’t they do a collaboration with tubi or another free platform.

  • @thisisacrappyusername892
    @thisisacrappyusername892 12 днів тому +4

    Tbh the first point should have been to cut costs, because the fans are ultimately there for three core elements: Ryan, Shane, Scary stories
    This is why you need business people as well as creatives, sometimes you gotta sacrifice the overall vision if youre not hitting bottom line

  • @Tararaoo1
    @Tararaoo1 12 днів тому +8

    Steven Lim ruined their channel

  • @BaybeeWaddles
    @BaybeeWaddles 13 днів тому +36

    Cannot express how disappointed I am that they have completely thrown away their fans due to financial greed. I resent financially well off people tell me what constitutes affordable. The theatrical video making this seem like a thoughtful decision rather than another money grab is infuriating.
    I always wanted Charlie to react to their videos, but I hate that it's because of this.

    • @SleepyLeeeee
      @SleepyLeeeee 12 днів тому +2

      They couldn't even act bothered by it.

  • @okchun
    @okchun 13 днів тому +19

    other streaming services are around the same price or slightly more for many many shows and movies but this is just for one series??

    • @amelie1448
      @amelie1448 13 днів тому

      They do multiple series but with a lot less episodes

  • @allhailkingboo
    @allhailkingboo 12 днів тому +5

    It’s giving “we’re butthurt that no networks want to pick us up so…”

  • @mayukhikhan8121
    @mayukhikhan8121 13 днів тому +7

    They used to be my absolute favourites at Buzzfeed. Their “Unsolved” videos were an essential part of my childhood. So sad to hear this turn of events.

  • @gingersnap931
    @gingersnap931 12 днів тому +3

    My grandma always said that any amount of money is a lot of money if you don’t have it. Some people can’t afford to feed their families and keep a roof over their head.
    I went off Watcher when a by one of them, I can’t remember who, said during the BLM movement that they had racist friends….yeah not people I wanna support

  • @elodieridesagain3018
    @elodieridesagain3018 12 днів тому +6

    To say the quiet part out loud. Nobody ever liked Steven.

  • @NooralainMirza
    @NooralainMirza 13 днів тому +21

    They got to Shane and Ryan too 😭

  • @grth-is6xv
    @grth-is6xv 11 днів тому +3

    What really bothers me is how some people have actually forgiven them for this, kinda like how a victim makes excuses for their abuser

  • @danavarrone
    @danavarrone 13 днів тому +5

    When I saw the thumbnail and title of their video I thought they were retiring, little did I know it was WORSE than that. Such a stab in the back to their audience and it came out of nowhere. I never expected them to be so greedy. So disappointed.

    • @MemoriesofOctober
      @MemoriesofOctober 12 днів тому

      This would’ve been a better decision Fr..2020 era Watcher was great 2024..Nah not paywall worthy content. Retirement would’ve been a respectable move.

  • @ajs8721
    @ajs8721 12 днів тому +2

    UA-camrs/Content Creators always need to remember who their core audience is. It seems like these guys got so caught up with “keeping up with the Joneses” and wanted to be on par with higher-level production companies that other companies became their new focus, not the audience anymore. To start a subscription service where subscribers only get 4 new videos a month at $6/month, is absolute lunacy. I already pay $6/month for my Peacock subscription. Yes, it’s $6, but I have access to 100s of TV shows and movies every month, NOT four.

  • @lune7298
    @lune7298 12 днів тому +2

    3:15
    Steven's idea of making things affordable for "anybody and everybody" forgets that not everyone lives in the USA. In Latin America, for instance, lots of folks earn less than $1000 a month, and in Venezuela, the average salary is just $145. It's a reminder that not everyone has the same financial privileges, especially in different parts of the world.

  • @loretta_3843
    @loretta_3843 12 днів тому +5

    It really looks like a move by people who have really forgotten what being an average, everyday person is and means. It really screams "over indulgence" to me. The only one putting these high production costs on their work is themselves. The extra bells and whistles aren't needed and speak of a loss of touch with reality. As if "This is beneath me, my work must be Oscar worthy material, I am an artiste after all." For people who talk about quality of production so much, it's a really bad look.

  • @ananyajoshi7080
    @ananyajoshi7080 13 днів тому +9

    This is so unfortunate, I used to love their dynamic so much!! Buzzfeed unsolved was such a great show.

  • @zivens.2407
    @zivens.2407 13 днів тому +16

    Not Spill covering the Watcher controversy 😂

  • @ia490
    @ia490 13 днів тому +8

    It's an insane move. Their content (as good as it can be) doesn't justify a whole ass streaming service. Like what???

  • @krishakoli3690
    @krishakoli3690 13 днів тому +11

    I could’ve NEVER imagined in a million years the ghoul boys would be in a TEA SPILL TODAY NOOOOO🤧

  • @wwzd2112
    @wwzd2112 13 днів тому +15

    I've been watching their contents since their buzzfeed days and really love shane & ryan so when they moved to watcher, i subscribed the channel as well, but oh boy with $6 in my country currency i can buy a whole week worth of grocery, so no thanks 😢😢

  • @maaretrahkonen7706
    @maaretrahkonen7706 13 днів тому +10

    If 10% of their subscribers pay that 5,99 they will get 1,8M every month. So probably this will be worth it for them.

    • @Zari-yari
      @Zari-yari 13 днів тому +3

      Yeah I keep wondering if this was their hope all along. Like they knew it would cause a big backlash, but are banking on 10% or whatever to sign up...
      They have a live show this week though. That's gonna be uncomfy.

    • @afriendorfoe
      @afriendorfoe 13 днів тому +3

      They're already making around that much now.

    • @Meocross
      @Meocross 13 днів тому +1

      Reminds me of youtube threatening us to disable our blockers on youtube until i threw their browser away.

    • @iamgem
      @iamgem 12 днів тому +3

      Sure but to maintain those numbers will be difficult considering their brand will be dragged through the mud

  • @orangejuice871
    @orangejuice871 13 днів тому +12

    I had the honor of watching this video as soon as it came out. Not gonna lie I was pretty sad when I first saw the title and I thought they were actually leaving for good. I cannot believe how strongly my opinion changed in only a few minutes of watching a video, and I cant believe they would do this. I always took them for the good soft guys like what the TryGuys are, but this? This is just evil and bad. Im gonna have to say goodbye to their humor and content cause I absolutely cannot afford to pay moeny just for a couple of videos KNOWING that they were already earning more than enough on UA-cam and that they just chose to be more greedy

  • @LibertineKr
    @LibertineKr 13 днів тому +7

    People need to stop talking like Shane and Ryan were forced to do this by Steven 😂 I know he's the least popular one but let's not get delusional from our parasocial relationship with them. We don't know them behind the scenes. "Ghoul boys would never 😢" What? Shane and Ryan are co-founders and owners of this company too. There's literally no way Steven alone could push this. I'm disappointed by all 3 of them.

    • @michaelahankins4295
      @michaelahankins4295 13 днів тому +1

      It's unfortunate. Hurts to have the wool ripped off like this.

    • @swampratguttergoblin
      @swampratguttergoblin 11 днів тому +2

      No fr I don't doubt Steven probably reached out with the idea bc he is absolutely the most out of touch and money grabbing of them all, but Shane and Ryan aren't helpless victims to him, they couldve said no, they could've made changes and hell if Steven was that bad, they absolutely could've left just like they did with BuzzFeed, they're grown men who made an awful joint decision and yeah they might regret BUT they still had choices, they made this one, willingly

  • @SheenaBeena06
    @SheenaBeena06 12 днів тому +5

    They’re literally charging the same amount I pay for SHUDDER!🙄

    • @dumpthecherries
      @dumpthecherries 12 днів тому +1

      My first thought too! Shudder originals slap! And on top of all the other movies and shows they have it’s worth it. No way Watcher is going to be putting out the same level or amount of og content.

    • @SheenaBeena06
      @SheenaBeena06 12 днів тому

      @@dumpthecherries exactly! I just think this is career suicide for them!