MongoDB versus ScyllaDB, in production at Numberly

Поділитися
Вставка

КОМЕНТАРІ • 7

  • @AlexFox-xr7gi
    @AlexFox-xr7gi Рік тому +18

    4 years later, first time I hear about Scylla

    • @richsoftwareguy
      @richsoftwareguy Рік тому +1

      Big ol nothing burger after 4 years. Team went with Clickhouse for better technical capabilities and closer to the metal.

    • @virenderverma_architect
      @virenderverma_architect Рік тому +1

      @@richsoftwareguy Can you explain more about

    • @user-qi5kb5th7y
      @user-qi5kb5th7y Рік тому +1

      ​@@richsoftwareguy you mean they replaced scylla with clickhouse? it wouldn't be possible, they are too different

    • @pelvispresley22
      @pelvispresley22 Рік тому +2

      @@richsoftwareguy from what i'm reading online Clickhouse is meant for OLAP workloads since it's column oriented, while Scylla or Cassandra are wide-column and meant for OLTP workloads. Different tech for different use cases here.

  • @Alberto_Cavalcante
    @Alberto_Cavalcante 10 місяців тому +1

    Very good, and thanks for the honesty in mentioning what is not so well

  • @get_downed_boi6270
    @get_downed_boi6270 11 місяців тому

    ya im dealing with all the sec filings for companies and mongodb really is slow af even on host!