This lecture covers the "utility" requirement of 35 USC § 101, including operable utility, beneficial (or moral) utility, and practical (or substantial) utility.
First of all thank you so much for all these videos they are truly splendid. However, i have 2 remarks/question concerning this one; i researched more and found this; 1) The date of the The Lowell vs Lewis case is 1817 not 1917. 2) The date of the Re Fisher case is 2005 not 2000. Therefore, the USPTO 2001 guidelines did not really ''follow up'' on the Re Fisher case. PS: Please someone correct me if i am in the wrong. A clarification would mean the world to me.
I was honored with earlier institution work getting "utility" app. on April 25, 2015 MSU-B COB and U of M Finals project and feasibility study plan strategies advocating disabled Rehabilitation-IT "renewable energy" industry accommodations on Domestic Shareholder, Stakeholder Independence interests. Take Stock, POTUS Trump!!
First of all thank you so much for all these videos they are truly splendid. However, i have 2 remarks/question concerning this one; i researched more and found this;
1) The date of the The Lowell vs Lewis case is 1817 not 1917.
2) The date of the Re Fisher case is 2005 not 2000. Therefore, the USPTO 2001 guidelines did not really ''follow up'' on the Re Fisher case.
PS: Please someone correct me if i am in the wrong. A clarification would mean the world to me.
Bestiality would be the Story “immoral” violation so Chimeric is out. Just depends on patent agent.
Would you be willing to hear a patent case. Would like to hear your opinion. If so, how can I contact you.
I was honored with earlier institution work getting "utility" app. on April 25, 2015 MSU-B COB and U of M Finals project and feasibility study plan strategies advocating disabled Rehabilitation-IT "renewable energy" industry accommodations on Domestic Shareholder, Stakeholder Independence interests. Take Stock, POTUS Trump!!