Why All The Planets Are On The Same Orbital Plane
Вставка
- Опубліковано 24 лип 2024
- Is it a coincidence? Or is something else at play here?
SUBSCRIBE for more space videos: goo.gl/WX4iMN
Patreon: goo.gl/GGA5xT
Facebook! goo.gl/uaOlWW
Twitter! goo.gl/VCfejs
Ethereum Wallet: 0x5F8cf793962ae8Df4Cba017E7A6159a104744038
Become a Patron today and support Astrum! Donate link above. I can't do it without you. Patreons can help pick the next Astrum Answers in a fortnightly poll. Thanks to those who have supported so far!
Astrum Spanish: bit.ly/2KmkssR
Image Credits: NASA/ESO/ESA/Sean Doran/Matthew Bate/Space Engine/NOAA/apbiolghs/UK Astrophysical Fluids Facility
Music Credits: Ketsa - Angel Falling, UA-cam Library - Mist
There seems to be some confusion about how there are some moons that orbit their planets retrograde. These are moons that are captured objects, objects whichs did not form alongside the planet. These are known as irregular moons, different from the regular moons which formed with the planet and thus orbit along its plane.
And Pluto's very different orbit (likely due to similar gravitational interactions with Saturn or Jupiter) was very much a part of why it was "voted off of Planet Island".
EDIT: snate56 has corrected me, that it was voted off for it's size. So... I guess size does matter...
EDIT #2: and Emilia Little has informed me that it simply hasn't cleared it's orbit. Let's see if IAU changes it's mind again in the next 10 after debating the value of using a word adopted from astrology: "planet."
Yep.. like Neptunes moon Triton, is that right?
@@nettyz833 yes exactly!
PRIMER FIELDS shape all galaxies.
All the 'planets' and 'moon' and all other luminous objects in the 'universe' rotate the same direction because they are floating in the liquid hydrogen layer approximately 120 miles above 'Earth'. These luminous objects are rotating around the 'North Pole'; 'Earth is in the center of the 'universe'. The 'stars' are simply crystalline minerals similar to diamonds that emit light when are electromagnetically charged. The 'planets' are artificial satellites as is the 'moon', all of which resist the flow of the liquid hydrogen. Sunlight is the effect caused by the interaction between the electromagnetic force field located about 250 miles above 'Earth'; there is an artificial satellite composed of superconducting material that creates a plasma field when interacting with the electromagnetic force field, which encloses 'earth'.
'Earth' ('existence' / 'reality') is created from electromagnetic energy and consciousness; each 'atom' that composes 'matter' is simply a force field; objects appear solid because one force field resists another. Bonus answer: the sky is blue because it is composed of liquid helium that is a fluorescent gas, as is argon, neon and xenon that each emit colors that create the sunrise and sunset. Our 'World' is simply an artificially created bio-habitat for biologically engineered organisms; we are in a 'zoo'.
I love learning astrophysics at 4am, when I can’t sleep. Thank you!
Me rn, at 4am, unable to sleep, watching Astrum, 2 weeks later. 🥺
@@apollonius7227 Me, at 3am, unable to sleep, watching Astrum, 2 days later :/
The places our minds choose to go when we can't sleep. Instead night was the Sumerians
It's 4:35 for me 🥲
Then dont watch this, its make believe lol.
mom: why is your room a mess?
me: let's go back billions of years ago ..
I'm still waiting my room to self organize itself
@@anothermouth7077 after the chaotic junk cancel each other out, you will be left with an organized room.
@Darth Quantum Yeah I guess "your room" is more of a CLOSED SYSTEM than a proto solar system, just like the 2nd law of thermodynamics postulates.
But if there were forces that "swirled" into your room with enormous power over enormous amounts of time, you "stuff" would take on a regular form (like your clothes in the dryer does) :)
Sounds like the start of a Sheldon Cooper answer
How much power ? Doc Brown said " 1.21 gigawatts ".
"As a matter of fact I DO know."
(5 minutes later)
"Oh, that I did NOT know."
Happens with everything I look at love theres always something to learn
I've always loved the simplicity of the demo with the lycra and marbles. Thanks for including it!
If the universe is self-organising, I guess that means I can sleep in.
Yes only for healthy amounts of time
It'll self organise you out of bed
Life.. finds a way..
Lead them to liberty or death.
R u buddha or hitler hahahahaha
Yes take a load off, I am! Then, coffee 😋
Hahahahaha like you were planning on organising the universe
Thanks for including the bit with the balls rolling on lycra. It really helped me understand the concept of objects self-organizing. Now I get why there are so many craters on planets and moons, even though we don't see impacts happening a lot.
4:12 Two planets get yeeted out the observable universe.
Ahahaah yes
Whitnessed in the simulation at 6:07 xD
Actually laughed out loud
Outta the solar system, jerk!
I witnessed my first total solar eclipse in 2017. I had been brushing up on solar system astronomy in preparation, so I had planetary positions and relative distances mapped out in my head, hoping I'd get to see a few during totality. What I didn't expect was when the sun and moon came into alignment, and all the planets came into stark visibility, was a remarkabe visceral conception of the solar system's scale and my tiny tiny position within it. Watching the wel-known moon creeping over the sun's disk in real time until at last it blotted it out completely, gave me just enough intuitive grasp of AU-scale to suddenly feel like I was standing on the floor of a solar-system -sized cathedral, looking up into a first person perception of the great vault. The shift in perspective was breathtaking and so vertigo inducing that I had to sit down for the rest of totality, as to not fall over. My total perspective vortex included actualy *seeing* the planetary plane al at once. It was extraordinaire.
Well if you're in the U.S. or Mexico on April 8, 2024, don't forget to bring a reclining lawn chair with ya.
Now I'm ready mates
@@6blak197enjoy!
This very question long bounced about in the back of my mind quite often. But usually at times when researching was not convenient. And then it would slip away. Thanks for this. 🌠The more you know…
is that the best fictional backstory you can come up with. Jesus Christ what else Haas long bounced around up there. researching is not convenient. lol. is that cos someone in the family using the laptop again. guess we'll have to wait till a more convenient time.
@@metalwellington Jesus christ, this guy.
Examples of when researching is not convenient: Driving, stuck in traffic, trying to fall asleep, whilst in work, whilst shopping, whilst changing the babies nappy, whilst cycling, whilst painting or other DIY, whilst gardening, whist waiting in a game lobby, whilst playing said game or waiting for it to load... Etc etc.
Edit: yes, and of course, when somebody else is using the laptop or computer.
"Out of chaos, comes order." - Swami Shinyone Incarnate
"The more you know…"
... the more angry you are at ignorant people?
Finish that sentence
After re-watching How the Universe Works so many times I began to feel a void for interesting space videos with awesome animation. That void has been filled by your channel. Thank you!
While I didn't expect to learn too much from this video, I gotta say a couple of the visualisations were quite impressive. They will definitely make an explanation easier next time I'm asked a similar question, TYVM!
👁 👁 I almost always had this question, but never really realised to ask it (YT or any-thing/-person else)
Same here. I popped down to the comments to mention how this very question pops into my head quite often. But usually at a time when researching the answer is not convenient. And then it goes out of my head again.
Thomas Kelly 🌚👉👈🌝
Ive always thought that was kind of funny. It's almost like a half formed thought. Something enough to make you wonder, but not enough to even consider pursuing an answer. It's like right between one's conscious thought and subconscious.
Same
Me too.
I just thought about this subject a few days ago. love your channel so much
I have watched this at least 300 times. Amazing animations and commentary. Thank you so much for creating this video. It must have taken a lot of time to create it
Great video but missed a lot of things: Venus actually spins opposite from all other planets in our solar system. Also, vast majority of star systems observed are NOT on a single plane. We still don't know why/how planar orbital systems like ours happen, but we know they are more unique/rare.
I think he was talking about the orbital path, not the spin of the planets.
@@JSSTyger yes Venus spins on the opposite orbital direction
@@mrpink878 Rotation about its own axis is not the same as the orbital path around the Sun. All of the planets go the same direction around the Sun.
@@JSSTyger you right, still though, our solar system is unique in how our planets are on one single plane
Awesome Alex, enjoy these immensely!
"Why do planets orbit in the same plane?"
*explains the entirety of planetary formation*
It doesn't answer why some things don't follow this rule or how Uranus has moons that go the opposite way
Retrograde planet's didn't form with the planet, but were captured. Sounds theoretical
Ethen Sun Randomness Yeah, this video needed not be longer than one minute.
Naturally. How else could you do it?
@@theoriginalshew yes it does. The particles orbiting Uranus just started spinning that way
These videos are always nicely made by a clearly enthusiastic individual. They are presented nicely and the viewer isnt instantly begged to 'like n subscribe'... and that alone is why i have subscibed :)
It's nice to think how similar this is to the "spontaneous" synchronization of metronomes ticking on a sliding surface. Conservation of momentum seems to create order in a lot of places we expected to see chaos.
FINALLY I can stop asking myself this question.
One down, 4 billion other questions to go. 😋
@@kinorai why not more than 4 billion?
@@Cat_in_Spacetime Let's say I'm starting with my fist couple of billions 😉
You didn't really have to wait for a YT video to answer that burning question.
Yes,same here. Now I can quit therapy, patch things up with the wife and kids,get some sleep. A great burden has been lifted.
Thank you, Alex. This update brightened up my day. In this bleak time, it's nice to be reminded that order could emerge from chaos. Long after we're gone, the cloud and dust from the remnants of solar system might be recycled in this way to form a new generation of stars. Our existence, including our crisis, is nothing but a petty blip in the vastness of the universe. Yes the knowledge gives me existensial crisis, but it's also awe inspiring.
I hope you and your little family is well and healthy. Take care.
Fun fact. In contemporary functional linguistics theories, human languages are also seen as emerging complex systems, with frequency of use playing a role analogous to that of gravity (frequent patterns attract more members, as in wept > weeped) up to a threshold. It is a highly quantitative, probabilistic view of language, and has great explanatory power =)
This question has been bothering me for years and no one I asked has been able to answer it. Thank you so much for posting it, makes so much intuitive sense. Liked the part about self-organizing emergent-systems as well.
And that demonstration was so wonderful. Thanks to the prof who did that.
mhm
I'm so glad that this came in my recommendation, I've always have so much liking in planetary science and computer science.
melodysheep, also one of the best!
All I can say is wow! So amazing to watch this. Specially the demo with the marbles ☺️👌
Lot’s of greetings, Dennis 🇳🇱
A recent video raised this question for me.
It turns out you had already answered it.
Thank you!
Gives the phrase circle of life a whole new meaning
Everything is a circle (✿☉｡☉)
so weak
Elipse of life, surely.
Except the cube.
@@yoooyoyooo yeah but you can walk a circle round a cube.
THANK YOU!! My whole life I was wondering this. I wasn’t sure if it was simply how it was drawn for a reference and it was more like an atom. But this confirms that the solar system is disc shaped.
You have made orbital patterns & solar spin comprehensible, thank you. Very cool
Thank you, Astrum! I have always wondered about this. And always, I’ve never gotten around to researching it. Thank you for explaining with visual aids, as well. You’re awesome!
I have been wondering about this for years. Thanks.
Ah Astrum 💓
Thanks for this when I had nothing to watch
These videos are amazing! Keep up the good work!
I feel almost emotional watching the animation of the creation of our moon at 6:35. It's just astounding that we know what we know.
Ever heard of Synestia?
There are new era moon formation theories coming out that are challenging the classical notion of how our moon in particular formed.
There’s also the Geonuclear formation theory.
It will be interesting to see which of the theories withstands the trial of time and science the most. So many viable candidates to explain how the moon is where it is.
Astrum is just a delightful pinch of straight to the point interesting information.
You forgot to mention the main key point- conservation of angular momentum.
Exactly. That’s literally the whole answer I was like when is he going to say it
Yah I was waiting for this as well.
Love your work. Merry Christmas!
nice work there buddy, keep up the good work
"Yea, yea, I got this one. The gas that forms the planets was all going around the same way, so obviously the planets will too."
Watches video.
"Oh, you explain WHY the gas was all going around the same way. Damn you are good!"
They showed the gas orbiting clockwise and the planets counter clockwise. Watch video again.
spoiler alert
Gas and dust*
This was me as well.
@@ctcook8374 you know that if you look at a clock from behind, then it will go counterclockwise from your perspective?
Me at 4am: I should get some sleep.
UA-cam: hey, why are all planets on the same orbital plane?
Me: I don't need sleep, I need answers
LMAO dammit, every night! 😆😆😆
I've had this question in my mind for 3 days. Thank you.
Thank you!
So the sayings, "go along to get along." And, "If you can't beat em, join em." Has a much larger meaning, and applicable to much more than our social lives? 😁👍
Nice. The logic of those 2 sayings is pretty heavy, now.
The lycra sheet demo was very clever and showed at once what was going on. Well done.
But that lycra sheet has an observable physical mass....space does not....does this mean that the blackness of space has a mass...because the Sun is suspended
But that lycra sheet has an observable physical mass....space does not....does this mean that the blackness of space has a mass...because the Sun is suspended
Just found this channel now after searching the question itself... subbed, lets see where this goes.
Got two answers from this video why the formation of star takes place from accreditation disk and why there is this much symmetry in our solar system. Thanks a lot 😊
When you showed us Saturn with its rings it made me wonder if any observations/readings were made to see if the rings are loosing matter or getting "thinner" with time.
I believe Saturn is slowly losing its rings
the Rings may just get thinner and eventually turn into moons. This might be the reason for Saturn now having more number of moons than Jupiter. It can have even more moons after every ring turns into moon!
That was before Cassini discovered that the small shepherd moons are adding mass to the rings through volcanic action.
@@patrickturner6878 I wonder why the hexagon exists on the north pole, surely this is electrical in nature, some sort of aurora formation.
@@MotesTV Nope. That is actual cloud formation and scientists aren't sure why it is there. The thermodynamics of the outer planets aee only just now starting to be understood.
I've always wondered this but never looked it up for some reason.
The universe provides anyway.
Fantastic video. Answered something I didn’t know I didn’t know. Many thanks.
3:10 ... space time Layed Out!!! so brilliantly intuitive ... massive thax n kudos f inventive-ness n presentation ....
This video explained to me the existence of those nebulae, like ones photographed by Hubble, which I've wondered about, then basically, it's order emanating from chaos.
I’ve had this question for so long but never knew the correct way to ask it or look it up thank you. Before watching I’m going to say that I think it’s from the spin of the bodies we orbit
Thank you, amazing explanation, i had had this question for years
so nice channel
i really really love this channel
it gave me so much knowledge
I've wondered about this forever
Pluto just there orbiting the sun on a 17 degree angle while everyone else is in a 0 degree angle :/
Neptune, not Pluto.
Pluto did coke
@@breastmilkgaming 😂😂😂
Maybe Pluto has a 0° orbit and the rest of the planets have a 17° inclination.
See Pluto? Even if you're not a planet, your glass can still be half full! 🤗
What about earth? 😏
Very informative. Good stuff
Always wondered. Thank you!
"Let's go back billions of years ago to before the solar system was formed"
Reported for inciting violation of causality.
hahahahahaha
Also, you will find that the planetary plane is 90 degrees from the sun's polar axis. If you take a weight on a string and spin it about as you rotate, you will find that the weight moves to this 90 degree angle from your axis of spin, and any force applied to change this angle will only be temporary.
"IF" my latest TOE idea is really true, (and I have a gravity test to prove or disprove that portion of the TOE idea, just not the resources to do so), but 'if' true, then the 'gem' photon is the energy unit of this universe that makes up space and time itself and would also potentially be it's own self causal event, and hence, the true eternally existent absolute somethingness that all things come from and are made up of.
Here is a copy and paste of a part of my comment to another individual on another YT channel in a discussion concerning 'cause and effect':
I can clearly see what you are saying about the effect of a cause in itself may be a cause for a later effect. And in that regard, yes it could be seen as being the same. But a 'cause' usually comes before an 'effect'. And in that context, if something never ever changes, the cause brings about an effect (no change) which in itself is a cause (no change) which then brings about an effect (no change),......., and both the cause and effect are identical and no change occurs.
But now, if some state of existence changes somewhere in the process, either via a cause that is not identical to the effect or an effect that is not identical to a cause, then change occurs. But for a change to occur that causes some later effect still puts a cause before an effect. One total state of existence changing to bring about another total but different state of existence.
Logically speaking, I can't see how one could have a different state of existence (effect) from a previous state of existence that was not identical (cause) to bring about the later different state of existence. And sure, that later effect might possibly be the cause to future effects and so on and so forth and possibly life happens and evolves in a cause/effect/cause/effect.... kind of way.
And in essence, 'if' for example my latest theory of everything is really true, that the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon is the basic energy unit of this universe that brings about everything in this universe, including even numbers themselves for math to do what math does, a singular energy unit with 3 different modalities, each modality acting 90 degrees from the other two, while the basic structure of the 'gem' photon itself never changes, it's the interaction with other 'gem' photons in existence whereby other future effects occur in a cause and effect kind of way. And sure, later effects become the cause of later effects and so on and so forth. But the pulsating, swirling 'gem' photons themselves would eternally exist as they themselves make up space and time itself. Eternally the same, but yet interactions with other like 'gem' photons brings about change. (But I fully acknowledge that this TOE idea is dependent upon the results of my gravity test.) But in the context of this discussion, it is a possibility at this time of how reality truly is.
In essence, the basic pulsating, swirling 'gem' photon would be both the 'cause' and the 'effect' all contained within itself and in that context, both the 'cause' and 'effect' would be identical.
* Added note: The universe ALWAYS existed in some form and did not have a beginning, nor might it ever end. The creation accounts in the Bible and other religion's belief systems, as well as the singular 'big bang' theory, are all just fairy tales.
Charles B. You are the perfect vehicle for the “Make your eyes glaze over” effect. I seriously doubt anyone read the bulk of your text but instinctively read the “* Added note:” conclusion. Which I partially agree with. I.E. the notation of a God and religions being fairy tales. However - the Big Bang Theory is not a Fairy Tale. It is a “Scientific Theory” … Think of it as food for thought based on currently understood facts and observations.
@@benthere4380 Well then:
a. How did the singularity eternally exist and then 'bang' one day?
b. Science says that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, a fundamental principal of physics. So, where did the one iota of energy come from to trigger the singularity to 'bang'?
c. What forces of nature existed to allow the singularity to exist and 'bang'?
d. What forces of nature allowed our current forces of nature to come into existence and stay in existence unchanged for so long?
And then also:
"IF" modern science is correct concerning the singular 'big bang' and how our current forces of nature came into existence, and that energy cannot be created nor destroyed, and that the universe is still expanding thereby making energy in this universe less and less dense:
a. What is going to occur to this universe and all in it probably 'when', not 'if', the forces of nature 'evolve'?
Edit: Since it was expansion of the singularity that supposedly brought our current forces of nature into existence and the singularity is still basically expanding. There would be no reasonable reason why the forces of nature shouldn't 'evolve' one day.
1. BPC: Blink, Poof, Change: In the blink of an eye the forces of nature 'evolve' and wipe out the entire universe and all in it, but yet we retain our consciousness somehow, someway, somewhere, in some state of existence? OR, and more probably:
2. BPG: Blink, Poof, Gone: In the blink of an eye the forces of nature 'evolve' and wipe out the entire universe and all in it, including our consciousness?
3. And possibly occurring in the very next moment of the expansion of this universe.
* So, is modern science truly correct concerning how our current forces of nature came into existence or aren't they? And if we all die in the end anyway, does anything or anyone ultimately matter anyway what is really true or not? At least one species truly has an actual conscious existence throughout all of future eternity for life itself to have continued meaning and purpose to, OR none do and life itself is all ultimately meaningless in the grand scheme of things. So, which is it?
I've been wondering this, but not sure how to Google it. Thank yoooou!!
Trial and error?
Going thru all of your content, as new fan. Your voice. Why? I dunno - keep at it, your content is amazing. Your voice is so soothing but I learn. I know I sound dumb, but I can't explain it. Thank you.
very informative, and how you explained it makes sense. thanks for the video
It's probably more accurate to say colliding objects average rather than cancel their momentum.
well but still
Average actually is more misleading.
The total momentum of the "system" (rings, moons or orbiting planets) is the SUM of the momentum of each individual sattellite.
Average would imply that after summing the momentum of the parts, you would divide by the total number of objects to get total momentum which is not correct.
" Cancelation" implies that objects with negative momentum (orbiting the opposite direction) will simply be subtracted from the total momentum of the system, canceling out some momentum of other particles moving on the positive direction.
An average would be the correct way to estimate the "total" velocity of the system, not momentum.
Fascinating...thank you! How does this square with the second law of thermodynamics that says that entropy of a system always increases? It seems to me that the system is actually getting more orderly, hence lower entropy. Silly question I'm sure, but foxed me.
The entropy of the system includes EVERYTHING in the system, and the entropy of all that hydrogen randomly moving and colliding in the sun (98% of the mass of the system) is enormous. Local low entropy elsewhere can't compete with that.
what a great question, and a even greater answer. Love your channel
Wowzers!
Yet another counter-example against the theory of entropy/inevitable disorder.
(Biological life being the most,err 'apparent'!)
Mr Astrum,your explanantions and presentations are brilliant.
How lucky we are to have you and others amongst us,sharing all this.
Shine on you crazy diamonds.
Thankyou thankyou thankyou!!!
"Its almost beautiful how in nature, you can have something so chaotic that will eventually form something rather calm and orderly"
Litterally my class from 5th Grade to 9th Grade
What..?
That’s how you know something is wrong with their little story... (and that they are lying)
God does exist. His evidence is everywhere in everything...
Just look at the game of life, order from chaos
Brian Cooley what’s your proof of his existence, millions of hours of research have gone into these hypotheses and they’re still not confident they are the truth. Why is one book which is thousands of years old definite proof of gods existence if this isn’t proof of science-based creation.
I must admit, I really thought that the Coriolis force would have a bigger effect. After all, the gas cloud would be in orbit around the center of the galaxy and, as it began to collapse, the outer parts, which would be moving faster, would "miss" then center and head to the leading part of the cloud in the galactic orbit. The inner part, moving slower, would head to the trailing part of the cloud. Much like what happens to a cyclone.
I thought Venus and Uranus had retrograde orbits?
@@buildingsheriff The orbital motion of Venus and Uranus around the sun is the same as for the other planets. The difference is, that Venus's axial rotation is upside down and Uranus's is turned by 90°
the coriolis is an "effect", not a force.
Incredibly well presented. Fascinating.
Awesome content. Thanks.
can't believe i never thought about this before
Very interesting video thanks! So, a question out of curiosity why Venus have a rotation different than the other planets? Could it be related with the fact that it doesn't have a moon also?
Always wondered this. Thank you for answering a life long question.
Pretty Awesome video! Didn't know that info!
That actually made a fair amount of sense in my little mind. Cheers!
Question:
Which direction the sun orbits the center of the galaxy?
Does the sun moves equator on or polar on? I mean can the planets be ahead of the sun in its orbits around the galaxy?
The planets orbits around the sun (which in turn, rotates along with our galaxy). I don't think we should look at space structurally. Meaning all things being always in motion, they can't be an "ahead" nor "backward"
At least I believe.
Videos like this make me tingle in the right places
Path of least resistance. It is the region of the least 'displacement' Much like the node points of a geometrical standing wave where matter tends to congregate within. The antinodal points of the standing wave impart a higher 'pressure' on the sand particles, resulting in their transition from a region of high pressure to low pressure.
For a minute I thought everything revolved around me, like 7 billion others.
Yes. It does all revolve around you. You are the center of the universe... just like all the rest of us snowflakes are. lol.
It's because of the Singularity.
@@con.troller4183 You are not even kidding. Theoretically, you are the centre of the universe. Nicceeee. Here's a high five for being awesome.
@@Messilegend1000
up HERE!
down THERE!
Cheers.
"Revolve" is not the best verbiage. Because the universe for you is the "center" not the "vortex" of your universe 😁😀
Kinda what ALOHA means 🤗
No...
It revolves around me
I’ve often wondered this myself because there’s no up and down in space. That’s a great visual aid with the lycra.
I'm not understanding what you are saying there's no up or down in space?
No matter what, all directions exist on this plane its as easy as this guy telling you the particles came from every direction to form the protostar
there is always a NORTH and a SOUTH, the south always brake more than north in all systems.
This episode was pure poetry. Thank you.
What an excellent video! Thank you.
Sounds like a “Grand Design,” which means that there must be a “Grand Designer!”
It's just PHYSICS, nothing more.
There are some Kuiper Belt objects orbiting perpendicular to the major planet's plane. Planet Nine, if it exists, orbits in a different plane too. I think there is still some mystery about why most planets orbit most stars in a common plane. There may be A LOT of planets in the universe that orbit stars in many different planets. We just aren't looking for them yet because of lack of technological tools. There are valid simulations of star formations that create many different planes of orbits around stars.
pluto isn't on the plane
I didn’t know if it was for sure if it was that way but now I know and that is amazing
Thank you! Very well demonstrated information 👍👍👍
Great explanation and watched several times to digest. I have been asking this question since the age of 14, decades ago. It’s something that was always astounded me. Science teachers at school, it seemed, couldn’t even grasp the concept. In particular, our solar system was always shown in 2D so when the question arose “what does it look like in 3D?”; there would always be this answer of “well it looks the same” but could never really get an answer of why.
Thank you so much for addressing this.
I have a question:
In the experiment with the balls, he gives them some initial momentum. If I understood it correctly, the direction with more initial momentum „wins“ over the other direction through the collisions of the balls. So, for this to happen in space, some initial momentum would be necessary as well. Where does this momentum come from?
Received from supernova burst? Or it always was there and goes right to Big Bang?
i actually did ask myself this but never bothered to look it and now here we are
All your videos are,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,Super cool and instructive and interesting,, thanks for all the Knowledge and your time
I ended up asking myself if one day the universe will even itself entirely.
No stars, only black holes. No asteroids, comets or dust, only planets and moons.
That's not far from the truth in the looooooong run when the universe dies in its heat death.
Even black holes will die because of hawking radiation
Wow very interesting point of veiw
I had asked the same question in Quora expecting a convincing answer. I get it in UA-cam. Thanks.
Thats because quora doesn't pay people to answer question . UA-cam is rewarding financially at the very least . But you have to wait for your unasked question to be "answered" , by being in your recommendation list . Or just search it up in their search engine , easier that way. Everything is documented these days. Nothing new under the sun.
Thank you. I have always wanted to understand how/why this occurs.
This was great i like never even thought about it radical my dude.
Funny how I was just wondering about this exact thing yesterday
I was today and THAT my friend is how strong the youtube algorithm has become
Thats God letting you know he's there
I was literally just telling the girl I talk to how all the planets and our moon follow the exact same line the sun does in the sky 2 days ago
Okay, if material in 3D space converges into what is essentially a 2D plane, does that mean that if you increased spatial dimensions, the result would always (eventually) be a 2D disk?
🤔
I see your point
this is this one of those weird things for me
something that you questioned about as a kid and got the answers to back then. but then years later, you forget you ever had that question - you have the answer yourself but forget that you already know it
Definitely a question I needed answered. I always wondered