The Great Liquidity Debate | Michael Howell & George Robertson on The Fed & Moneyprinting

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 3 лип 2024
  • Forward Guidance is sponsored by VanEck.
    Learn more about VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) vaneck.com/HODLFG.
    VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL) Prospectus: vaneck.com/us/hodlprospectus.
    __
    Michael Howell of Crossborder Capital and George Robertson of The Monetary Fronteir have two things in common: they both correctly predicted the renewed bull market in stocks and they both have been guests on The Forward Guidance podcast. That is where the similarities end, as Michael and George have entirely different explanations for what is driving the surge in equity prices. While Michael is renowned for his models on Global Liquidity and closely tracks the changes in central bank balance sheets (most notably the Fed’s), George dismisses the Fed entirely and thinks that monetary authorities have effectively zero influence on the economy and stock market. What ensues is a heated debate not just about what is driving the stock market and economy but about the very nature of money and credit creation itself. Recorded on April 10, 2024.
    __
    Follow VanEck on Twitter / vaneck_us
    Follow Michael Howell on Twitter / crossbordercap
    Follow George Robertson on Twitter / bickerinbrattle
    Follow Jack Farley on Twitter / jackfarley96
    Michael’s Substack t.co/7jRGW9iR0S
    George’s Substack themonetaryfrontier.substack....
    Michael’s Book www.amazon.com/Capital-Wars-R...
    Follow Forward Guidance on Twitter / forwardguidance
    Follow Blockworks on Twitter / blockworks_
    __
    Timestamps:
    00:00 Introduction
    00:32 Jack's Intro
    02:28 Michael's Opening Statement
    06:09 George's Opening Statement
    18:17 The Draining of The Fed's Reverse Repo (RRP) Facility
    24:59 VanEck Ad
    26:03
    28:38 The Portfolio Rebalancing Theory (I.E. How Quantitative Easing (QE) Theoretically Works)
    45:21 Duration Impact of U.S. Treasury Issuing Longer-Maturity Paper
    51:39 Spread Between Agency Mortgage-Backed Securities (MBS) Yield And 10-Year Treasury Yield
    01:12:09 There's A Distortion In The Yield Curve, That's For Sure"
    01:17:47 Beyond The Fed's Balance Sheet
    01:23:18 Jack's Comment On Cause And Effect
    01:25:07 Views On Markets: George And Michael Remain Very Bullish
    __
    Disclaimer: Nothing discussed on Forward Guidance should be considered as investment advice. Please always do your own research & speak to a financial advisor before thinking about, thinking about putting your money into these crazy markets.
  • Розваги

КОМЕНТАРІ • 224

  • @BlockworksHQ
    @BlockworksHQ  2 місяці тому +3

    Finally, you can easily access Bitcoin in a low-cost ETF with the VanEck Bitcoin Trust (HODL). Visit vaneck.com/HODLFG to learn more.

  • @cats_ARE_better_than_you
    @cats_ARE_better_than_you 2 місяці тому +94

    Michael: Here's my thesis and supporting data
    George: Trust me bro

    • @georgerobertson608
      @georgerobertson608 2 місяці тому +1

      what a nitwit statement come on help up come up with more

    • @cats_ARE_better_than_you
      @cats_ARE_better_than_you 2 місяці тому +4

      @@georgerobertson608 haha. Tell me more about the new magic 'private-sector-Fed' that will be created and other magical fantasies that I should just 'believe'. lol

    • @cats_ARE_better_than_you
      @cats_ARE_better_than_you 2 місяці тому +6

      @@georgerobertson608 only the US matters... trust me bro. It only makes up 4% of the world's population but the markets where the other 96% live do not matter.

    • @theguy9067
      @theguy9067 2 місяці тому +3

      "It's a fallacy" okay why?

    • @DegenerateSpeculator
      @DegenerateSpeculator 2 місяці тому +2

      🤔I think George was saying the FED is more of a cheerleader. I always think back to 2020 when they said they would purchase junk bonds, the markets front ran the FED and actually saved themselves. At the end of the day, the FED made a small purchase to save face but the heavy lifting was done by the markets as always

  • @rtra3863
    @rtra3863 2 місяці тому +118

    George=incoherent, inconsistent and contradictory
    Michael=well spoken, consistent and winning!

    • @DegenerateSpeculator
      @DegenerateSpeculator 2 місяці тому +3

      They both made solid points actually, despite the delivery

    • @d0cf1sh
      @d0cf1sh 2 місяці тому +18

      George came across as dismissive, where Michael has a long line of quant models over time backing liquidity as real

    • @silverschmerz4261
      @silverschmerz4261 2 місяці тому +16

      George Robertson = Word salad
      "USA is best. Now that I have your attention, follow my stock trading tips bro."
      LOL

    • @moonshinemagic1771
      @moonshinemagic1771 2 місяці тому +7

      TBH, George made a lot of sense in the second half of the interview (and even Mike agrees with him on a lot of points) - to see he didn't make sense is nonsense. Go back and watch.

    • @GrantLeeEdwards
      @GrantLeeEdwards 2 місяці тому +4

      You have it backwards. Unsurprisingly - herd mentality confuses pleasing, familiar tones for truth-value.
      Don’t be afraid of a little clank & jangle.

  • @sarawilliam696
    @sarawilliam696 2 місяці тому +210

    Investor skepticism surrounds the Fed's plan to maintain interest rates until inflation stabilizes. Personally, I'm unsure about investing $150k in my stock portfolio. I seek advice on the optimal strategy for navigating this market.

    • @Pamela.jess.245
      @Pamela.jess.245 2 місяці тому +2

      Investing in stocks can be a wise decision, especially if you have a reliable trading system that can lead you to fruitful days of success.

    • @KaurKhangura
      @KaurKhangura 2 місяці тому +1

      The issue is most people have the "I want to do it myself mentality" but not equipped enough for a crash, hence get burnt, no offense. In general, Financial Consultants are ideal reps for investing jobs, and at firsthand encounter, since Jan.2020, amidst covid outbreak, my portfolio has yielded massively in ROI, summing up to 7-figures as of today.

    • @PatrickFitzgerald-cx6io
      @PatrickFitzgerald-cx6io 2 місяці тому +1

      That's truly remarkable. I hope you don't mind pointing me towards their direction.

    • @KaurKhangura
      @KaurKhangura 2 місяці тому +1

      Certainly, there are a handful of experts in the field. I've experimented with a few over the past years, but I've stuck with ‘’Colleen Rose Mccaffery” for about five years now, and her performance has been consistently impressive.She’s quite known in her field, look-her up.

    • @PatrickFitzgerald-cx6io
      @PatrickFitzgerald-cx6io 2 місяці тому +1

      Thank you for this tip. It was easy to find your coach. Did my due diligence on her before scheduling a phone call with her. She seems proficient considering her resume.

  • @wayneatwell7039
    @wayneatwell7039 2 місяці тому +29

    At 11 minutes in I had no idea what George was talking about. Glad I checked the comments and saved myself 90 minutes. I have seen recent Howell interviews and know his thoughts, so not missing anything skipping the rest

  • @fabiodentamaro5941
    @fabiodentamaro5941 2 місяці тому +29

    Really difficult to understand George Robertson argumentations..

    • @theguy9067
      @theguy9067 2 місяці тому +7

      He doesn't have any

  • @VanessaFloyd-tt7yg
    @VanessaFloyd-tt7yg 2 місяці тому +161

    Certainly. Exchange-Traded Funds (ETFs) are popular for long-term investments due to their diversified nature. ETFs offer exposure to a wide range of assets, such as stocks, bonds, or commodities, which can help reduce risk. Some top choices for long-term investing include broad market index ETFs, sector-specific ETFs, and bond ETFs, as they provide potential for growth and income over an extended period while minimizing the risk associated with individual stocks.

    • @GrantJacobs-vt4zn
      @GrantJacobs-vt4zn 2 місяці тому

      Numerous compelling stocks span various industries for you to consider tracking. While it's not necessary to act on every prediction, enlisting the guidance of a financial advisor is advisable. They can assist you in determining optimal entry and exit points for purchasing and selling shares or ETFs, ensuring well-timed decisions aligned with your investment goals.

    • @user-pb8xf9if3c
      @user-pb8xf9if3c 2 місяці тому

      I agree, that's the more reason I prefer my day to day investment decisions being guided by an advisor seeing that their entire skillset is built around going long and short at the same time both employing risk for its asymmetrical upside and laying off risk as a hedge against the inevitable downward turns, coupled with the exclusive information/analysis they have, it's near impossible to not out-perform, been using my advisor for over 4years+ and I've netted over 2.8million.

    • @AndrewA.Peterson
      @AndrewA.Peterson 2 місяці тому

      Kindly share the details for reaching your advisor. With inflation negatively affecting my funds, I'm in search of a more lucrative investment strategy to optimize their performance.

    • @user-pb8xf9if3c
      @user-pb8xf9if3c 2 місяці тому

      Deborah Lynn Dilling covers things like investing, insurance, making sure retirement is well funded, going over tax benefits, ways to have a volatility buffer for investment risk. many things like that. Just take a look at her full name on the internet. She is well known so it shouldn't be hard to find her.

    • @AndrewA.Peterson
      @AndrewA.Peterson 2 місяці тому

      I greatly appreciate it. I'm fortunate to have come upon your message because investing greatly fascinates me. I'll look Deborah up and send her a message. You've truly motivated me. Thank you.

  • @wbltrack07
    @wbltrack07 2 місяці тому +35

    5 minutes in and George is making no sense. Not sure why he's invited on this pod

    • @stoneyj1a1
      @stoneyj1a1 2 місяці тому +1

      He seems to know what he's saying but nobody else does

    • @Nowhere-from
      @Nowhere-from 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@stoneyj1a1if George seems to know what he says you should enlighten us and explain. Other than that George is pure American hubris and flat out denial of the American reality: it's a 3rd word country by plenty of standards, especially standard of living of the average people or like 90% of population.

    • @freedomordeath89
      @freedomordeath89 2 місяці тому

      He has some good insights if you can get voer his personality, I love his twitter feuds ahahah

    • @icedmilo9271
      @icedmilo9271 2 місяці тому

      @@stoneyj1a1 Seems like he is just yapping away

  • @silverschmerz4261
    @silverschmerz4261 2 місяці тому +25

    George is that kid in class who forgot to read the book but has to give a book report in front of the class.
    "Yes, 'A Tale of Two Cities' was about, ummm, two cities. Yes. And ummm... they were really great cities. Awesome cities. Yea."

  • @tqbrowne
    @tqbrowne 2 місяці тому +13

    I gotta say, I’m more with Howell on this one. I really enjoyed this format as a fan of Howell and his work because it allowed for a bit of discovery into his process and assumptions. Thank you Jack and Blockworks!

  • @kameskettles7233
    @kameskettles7233 2 місяці тому +17

    Damn Jack, love your show but George's rambling is brain numbing. Needed you to redirect.

  • @badtaco2835
    @badtaco2835 2 місяці тому +23

    George is just as bad as he was in his first appearance

  • @netizenkane2230
    @netizenkane2230 2 місяці тому +2

    In the second part of the show, George, Michael, and Jack are saying the long end is discounted as part of Fed policy measures, which Michael is calling liquidity, while George has disagreed that this is a form of easing. Really good interview. The commenters saying that George doesn't make sense are not following his terminology. These are ex Solomon Bros. guys here people.

  • @carlrakes8077
    @carlrakes8077 2 місяці тому +12

    What is George saying!!?

    • @and1play5
      @and1play5 2 місяці тому +4

      No1 knows😭

  • @NicholasClones527
    @NicholasClones527 2 місяці тому +41

    I will be forever grateful to you, you changed my entire life and I will continue to preach on your behalf for the whole world to hear you saved me from huge financial debt with just a small investment, thank you Michelle Stewart.

    • @RebeccaLynn788
      @RebeccaLynn788 2 місяці тому

      Wow. I'm a bit perplexed seeing her been mentioned here also Didn’t know she has been good to so many people too this is wonderful, I'm in my fifth trade with her and it has been super.

    • @Troymatthew525
      @Troymatthew525 2 місяці тому

      She is my family's personal broker and also a personal broker in many families in United States, she's a licensed broker and a FINRA AGENT in United states

    • @OliverParker455
      @OliverParker455 2 місяці тому

      You trade with Michelle Stewart too? Wow that woman has been a blessing to me and my family.

    • @Harold560
      @Harold560 2 місяці тому

      I'm new at this, please how can I reach her?

    • @ElaineRich321
      @ElaineRich321 2 місяці тому

      I was skeptical at first till I decided to try. Its huge returns is awesome. I can't say much

  • @jayearl3591
    @jayearl3591 2 місяці тому +13

    Howell is the GOAT 🐐Would be great to see see a deflationist like Danielle DiMartino Booth or Hugh Hendry debate him

    • @diddy1302
      @diddy1302 2 місяці тому

      Hendry hasn’t got a Scooby

    • @jayearl3591
      @jayearl3591 2 місяці тому

      @@diddy1302 I agree, DDB would be the smarter option, but Hugh is entertaining.

  • @Law-of-love
    @Law-of-love 2 місяці тому +18

    George- most typical example of American “pseudo-intelligence “ - (I know nothing but can talk a lot) I have ever experienced. 🤕
    I am infinitely dumber for having wasted my time listening to any word salad he spewed 😢
    Strange how anything George can’t understand - “ doesn’t exist” ! 😮

  • @ariisaac5111
    @ariisaac5111 2 місяці тому +1

    Excellent debate from both sides of the argument. Very glad that block works hosts such extremely informative debates from such capable articulators of both sides of the argument, including the excellent host moderation and insightful questions. Please keep up the great work of such interviews!

  • @jvancek
    @jvancek 2 місяці тому +16

    George saying the federal reserve is required for democracy....all if his arguments are meaningless after that

  • @amandagreen8898
    @amandagreen8898 2 місяці тому +3

    Michael is truly a saint…….for patiently sitting through George’s utter nonsense 🤦‍♂️

  • @troy8231
    @troy8231 2 місяці тому +4

    George was misrepresenting Michael’s positions and using other views as examples that aren’t even Michael’s. 🤨

  • @iskundi8027
    @iskundi8027 2 місяці тому +10

    I will never be able to follow George’s logic

    • @theguy9067
      @theguy9067 2 місяці тому +5

      Because he doesn't supply any

    • @stoneyj1a1
      @stoneyj1a1 2 місяці тому

      ​@@theguy9067😂

    • @Nowhere-from
      @Nowhere-from 2 місяці тому +1

      ​@@stoneyj1a1again, enlighten us and explain George's logic.... forget it, I'll do it for you: George's logic is pure smugness, and yeah, hubris is always logical as it is superficial and supports simplistic arguments. Whenever reality doesn't agree hubris simply denies it.

  • @grokkinghumans
    @grokkinghumans 2 місяці тому +3

    Great interview! One point I wish they had discussed is the role of t-bills as collateral in offshore and shadow banking. More privately held t-bills means more collateral which leads to more lending. That's a plausible mechanism for why both the level and share of t-bills matter.

  • @samomarmd
    @samomarmd 2 місяці тому +11

    George Robertson 🤡 🌎 comments
    Confabulation inefficient trash talk

  • @JB-ty8vf
    @JB-ty8vf 2 місяці тому +1

    Holy COW can’t wait to see this!! Strong opinions!! What a GREAT PAIRING!!

  • @rallysportmotorclubrmc5290
    @rallysportmotorclubrmc5290 2 місяці тому

    Having worked in the BIS for 9 years. Michael is spot on here.👏🏼

  • @gmd9561
    @gmd9561 2 місяці тому +1

    Great episode. Solid arguments from both sides. I follow the work of both michael and george. Don't get why some in comments don't understand george.

    • @theonlyconstantischange123
      @theonlyconstantischange123 2 місяці тому +1

      Can u "explain like I'm 5" George's general stance? Seems somebody like u is needed here

  • @Fullstack_LP
    @Fullstack_LP 2 місяці тому

    This was a good format Jack: relatively loose and informal, long form, and good natured. Please host more of these.

  • @greggcal4583
    @greggcal4583 2 місяці тому +1

    Michael is someone to listen to.

  • @mc-kz8zn
    @mc-kz8zn 2 місяці тому +2

    This was fascinating. It shows how complex these topics can be, and how people can derive such vastly different views and opinions. Great pod...I really enjoyed listening to this debate! Also...how awesome would these two guys be in a debate with Janet Yellen and Jerome - let's make that happen! lol..

  • @mattanderson6672
    @mattanderson6672 2 місяці тому

    Thanks guys!!

  • @user-cu4eb2un5d
    @user-cu4eb2un5d 2 місяці тому

    Great debate guys 2 of the best!

  • @Lights_Darks
    @Lights_Darks 2 місяці тому

    Thanks for having both George and Michael on. Hmmm….sounds like WHAM!! Lol
    Leaned a lot from both of them.

  • @johnwhite9820
    @johnwhite9820 2 місяці тому

    Love when investors are secure enough to debate like this. Would love more. Well moderated, Jack

  • @MattCRHughes
    @MattCRHughes Місяць тому

    As someone who watched every one of Jeff Snider’s Eurodollar University YT videos for over a year, George is making identical arguments. This is a fascinating debate.

  • @investment6503
    @investment6503 2 місяці тому

    Oh boy, please bring these 2 bright minds back on the show very regularly!!! I haven’t enjoyed this kind of super constructive dialogue for a long time.
    I’m with Michael 100% about liquidity, but ain’t George adorable when he tried denying the existence of liquidity???😅
    I felt that George was making a few points, I just couldn’t wrap my head around his ideas… yet! However, he struck me with the idea that the Fed doesn’t exist!!! And he got me thinking that maybe he’s trying to say that the Fed is political after all even it says it doesn’t. Obviously, fiscal policy commands monetary policy, right? Or I’m wrong? I always have a biased view that Politics and Money are always connected if you dig hard enough. Anyone who tries to convince anyone else otherwise is just a fool of the system… anyway, very well-constructed discussion. Big thanks!!!

    • @garrettpatten6312
      @garrettpatten6312 26 днів тому

      George Gammon or whatever does a much better job imo showing and explaining that Reserves don't matter when it comes to M2 until we get to the covid bail out period. M2 grows by trillions while Reserves stay around 40 billion. It's not until 2021 that you see Reserves, Stocks, and M2 rise exponentially together. John Titus also has great work on this topic. As far as I can tell from this interview george is a uniformitarian kool aid drinker when it comes to the US and the dollar. I'm sure he makes good investments because most other investors are USA koolaid drinkers too. I don't think the dollar is going anywhere anytime soon but to act like there is no time component to the availability of capital (ie liquidity) makes no sense. If I make a million dollars over the course of my life at no point would I ever be a millionaire. So saying "but the money will be spent eventually" doesn't mean when or how doesn't matter lol

  • @JohnKasonde-zd3ig
    @JohnKasonde-zd3ig 2 місяці тому

    Michael Howell has a scientific approach to markets that is rooted in facts and empirical evidence.

  • @steviechang
    @steviechang 2 місяці тому

    spicy as promised. Excellently executed and moderated, Jack. Thanks for this

  • @alicegomez7232
    @alicegomez7232 2 місяці тому +115

    Given the current economic difficulties that the country is experiencing, how can we enhance our earnings during this period of adjustment? I cannot let my $680k savings vanish after putting in so much effort to accumulate them.

    • @Blitcliffe
      @Blitcliffe 2 місяці тому +1

      Well the bigger the risk, the bigger the reward and such impeccable decisions are better guided by professionals

    • @chrisbluebird5037
      @chrisbluebird5037 2 місяці тому +1

      Yes true, I have been in touch with a brokerage Advisor. With an initial starting reserve of $80k, my advisor chooses the entry and exit commands for my portfolio, which has grown to approximately $550k.

    • @wellsHannahh
      @wellsHannahh 2 місяці тому

      I’ve been looking to switch to an advisor for a while now. Any help pointing me to who your advisor is?

    • @chrisbluebird5037
      @chrisbluebird5037 2 місяці тому +2

      Amber Russell Bennett is the licensed advisor I use. Just research the name. You’d find necessary details to work with to set up an appointment.

    • @wellsHannahh
      @wellsHannahh 2 місяці тому +1

      I looked up her name online, went to her website, and sent her an email to arrange a meeting. I'm grateful.

  • @BatmanBoss
    @BatmanBoss 2 місяці тому +9

    I’m with Mike.

  • @michaelmincy4993
    @michaelmincy4993 2 місяці тому +2

    Will always listen to Howell. I don't think the other side believes in dollars created outside the US Eurodollar.

  • @patrickpk6299
    @patrickpk6299 2 місяці тому +3

    his point about govt spending driving up the market is true

    • @billybudapest3129
      @billybudapest3129 2 місяці тому

      Yes, but that is no insight, everyone listening already knew it.

  • @timothyjohnson4416
    @timothyjohnson4416 2 місяці тому

    One of the best shows on the internet and I believe both are arguing the point that our money system is broken. Bitcoin will be the currency and the network of the people's money. In time!!😎👍

  • @chuchiyang7031
    @chuchiyang7031 2 місяці тому

    Ty ❤

  • @AndrewMoraller
    @AndrewMoraller 2 місяці тому

    That was awesome!

  • @alexsmith3576
    @alexsmith3576 2 місяці тому

    Jack you are the GOAT. Love Michael Howell. Really was interested to hear George because I like out of the box perspectives, but it's hard to understand what he is trying to say. Sometimes I think there might be something there, and other times he seems to just get flustered people are not agreeing. Would love to see someone like Dr. Lacy Hunt instead discuss with Michael Howell. If I could see a dream discussion it would be Dr. Lacy Hunt and Joseph Wang. I really hope something like that happens.

  • @Weetorp
    @Weetorp 2 місяці тому +1

    George should not get more air time, he simply does not understand that Fed assets are outside the economy.

  • @user-eb3pi4tv9k
    @user-eb3pi4tv9k 2 місяці тому +5

    George not very articulate unfortunately.

  • @dave8212
    @dave8212 2 місяці тому

    Awesome!👍🏻💛

  • @JR-tp2rb
    @JR-tp2rb 2 місяці тому +2

    If George was an Astrophysicist he’d claim Black Holes don’t exist because he can’t see them. Right?

  • @vikrampansare8008
    @vikrampansare8008 2 місяці тому

    Mr. Robertson saying RRP isn't a facility even though it is explicitly referred to as such by pretty much everyone = huh? And that liquidity doesn't exist?? C'mon. Ability to roll debt in a massively over levered world is critical to keeping the system afloat.
    Overall, I'd say Dr. Howell came out the winner of this debate. He's not saying anything new, but his reasoning is clear, actionable, and backed up with plenty of data. It's rare you can say that a 'macro guy' made you money but that is the case with Dr. Howell.

  • @lexilamey365
    @lexilamey365 2 місяці тому +1

    If the liability is never repaid then its net money in the system. Debt printer go brrrr

    • @garrettpatten6312
      @garrettpatten6312 26 днів тому +1

      which on a large scale it literally never does it's only refinanced. M2 would have to grow at rates connected to the real world otherwise.

  • @karamsulaiman6605
    @karamsulaiman6605 2 місяці тому

    I was just thinking about the guy who was so ... on Blockworks Macro with Jack yesterday wondering who he was and what interview was that again!!!
    How is that possible!!! And here he is today and hence I got my answer.
    The world works in mysterious ways. Would love for them to have follow up discussion where they bring rigour, data and charts to the discussion for further conversation and clarity to the viewers!!!
    Would be highly entertaining and provocative for learning purposes!

  • @garrettpatten6312
    @garrettpatten6312 26 днів тому

    Okay George saying the real yeild curve is the future price of growing the economy - now that was a gold nugget.

  • @tpndtbk
    @tpndtbk 2 місяці тому

    Michael is the best!

  • @johnanon658
    @johnanon658 2 місяці тому

    Heck of a debate

  • @yeliangarcia4623
    @yeliangarcia4623 2 місяці тому

    So you're saying markets are complex adaptive dynamic systems...got it!

  • @jonathanliem9536
    @jonathanliem9536 2 місяці тому

    are they both just coming from different angles to identify the same thing: Sentiment/Confidence/Animals Spirits/etc?

  • @gaetancharbonneau3902
    @gaetancharbonneau3902 2 місяці тому

    Mr. Robertson is really something to figure out.

  • @dividenconquer2996
    @dividenconquer2996 2 місяці тому

    Michael Howell reminds me of Michael Caine. Well spoken and well mannered.

  • @dailydoseofnews4828
    @dailydoseofnews4828 2 місяці тому

    I strongly disagree with George and think that the variable rate countries will take the US down with em. But he does make a logical point and seems correct this far.

  • @Cecilia-
    @Cecilia- 2 місяці тому +1

    i have no clue what the 2nd guy said. We went through so many diff topics in 5 minute

  • @marcopriolo4480
    @marcopriolo4480 23 дні тому

    George is wrong about Canada's channel corridor system. This was changed to a floor system just like the USA back in 2020 when Covid happened.

  • @hume1234561
    @hume1234561 2 місяці тому

    I agree with both to some degree but I believe George is looking at things as they are whereas Michael is seeing them as they always has been.

  • @dustindavid5094
    @dustindavid5094 2 місяці тому

    Jack, what would be interesting is if you had a Lacy Hunt or Professor hanker join this type of debate. They are brilliant and claim the money supply is shrinking at the fastest rate in decades. I am trying to understand the difference between the money supply and global liquidity.

    • @garrettpatten6312
      @garrettpatten6312 26 днів тому

      liquidity in todays world is honestly the ability to pay debts when they come due. A liquidity crunch is the not the lack of assets it's a lack of cash when the bills come due. Look at SVB, they had their money in illiquid assets (albiet US treasuries which should be the most liquid asset in the world) but when the FED changed rates they had to sell those TBills at a loss to try and come up with cash to pay debts in real time. So did they not have the assets to back their liabilities? No but they didn't have the liquidity to pay their debts and depositors in the here and now when the demand came through. That's why having everyones savings tied up in homes an real estate is actually a negative as far as the velocity in the economy. If they would stop destorying the money people would just safe cash because it's 6-24 months more liquid than a house. So how do they solve that problem? Refinance. But who would refinance now? At a higher rate? No way. So that money is now locked up in thise homes. That reduces liquidity. Someone might have 300k dollars "saved in their home" but as soon as they don't have 2k cash on hand to pay the mortage they loose it all.

  • @gost9159
    @gost9159 2 місяці тому

    They’re basically saying the same thing differently

  • @BrianFrenchinternet-marketing
    @BrianFrenchinternet-marketing 2 місяці тому +1

    Jack such a great open.

  • @Bullypulpit
    @Bullypulpit 2 місяці тому

    6000 by year's end, thanks George!

  • @my0.02cents
    @my0.02cents 2 місяці тому

    im so glad i came to the comments i thought i was the only one who thought George was confidently talking shit

  • @pdoc1547
    @pdoc1547 2 місяці тому

    The irony of George telling Michael he is going to get wrecked is emblematic of that entire conversation.

  • @voonyeefong785
    @voonyeefong785 2 місяці тому

    Michael crystal clear on logic and won!!
    George, i just lost focus!

  • @christianng2828
    @christianng2828 2 місяці тому

    No better than Howell 💪🏻

  • @CJGification
    @CJGification 2 місяці тому

    George asks Mike to explain something
    Mike explains it clearly and with data to back it up
    George still doesn't believe him
    JFC

  • @dominicn
    @dominicn 2 місяці тому

    We should listen to all people regardless of their style. The liquidity argument seems to imagine a world where its debt function doesn't matter.

    • @aaronnorton2006
      @aaronnorton2006 2 місяці тому

      Of course it matters, but when your centrist bias of the U.S. blinds you to the debt (monetary spiral) it's in like George's position takes, you simply can't afford to think about liquidity in any other way than a market phenomena.

  • @jarrodnunn
    @jarrodnunn 2 місяці тому

    Mrkts went up and down before liquidity but now that central banks stepped in they take away dwnsde risk
    Seems like it matters now but its still debt to be paid later

  • @user-vi3sz3fg2r
    @user-vi3sz3fg2r 2 місяці тому +1

    Giddy-up.

  • @jaybarganier
    @jaybarganier 2 місяці тому

    The core of the issues with george’s argument is the fact that he views the US financial system as a completely closed system. “ there is no funding of the US Government.” Wow

  • @DesmondMiles333
    @DesmondMiles333 2 місяці тому

    Just a quick synopsis : George robertson and David hunter are best friends. MIchael Howell loves liquidity.

  • @KennethLSg
    @KennethLSg 2 місяці тому

    I cant follow George arguments at all. Im here to listen to Howard.

  • @dominicn
    @dominicn 2 місяці тому

    Jack ends it with saying the Fed doesn't matter in the long run effectively.

  • @lukejones7366
    @lukejones7366 2 місяці тому

    That's a spicy meatball!

  • @borsennews9261
    @borsennews9261 2 місяці тому

    In our county we say "if you talk to much you have less to say"... These Georg talks but I can't hear the point...

  • @libertysprings2244
    @libertysprings2244 Місяць тому

    Japan didn't prove qe doesn't matter. Japan had fiscal deficits but nowhere near the size the u.s. is doing, especially once considering the natural need for higher deficits once the country is built out and population near peak (much lower construction of homes and buildings). The u.s. is completely different and the fed's excessive qe is allowing congress to spend at such a high rate that inflation is bad. Japan never even got close to that. The only reason their debt to gdp is higher is because they hit peak construction investment way before we did and government had to spend more to keep the bubble from collapsing. In contrast, the u.s. is pumping in twice what they need to, causing the bubble to get so big it's almost unfathomable to me that Congress and the fed are allowing this insanity to destroy our once great country. It's making me so ill I can't even keep watching the video to think about it any more. Plus I don't care about stocks and crypto. Teeasuries is all you need to invest in and sleep well at night, with 5% in gold as insurance.

  • @JakeAllen3
    @JakeAllen3 2 місяці тому +3

    LETS GOO. George’s work always fascinating

  • @jhps1000
    @jhps1000 2 місяці тому

    Plunge protection team

  • @lorikennedy2601
    @lorikennedy2601 Місяць тому

    George is a bond trader. Spinning therory’s is easy, Managing money over decades isn't.

  • @janremus1539
    @janremus1539 2 місяці тому

    FOMC = monetary v Congress = Fiscal policy. FOMC QT Rates. Congress Infrastructure and Chips act and COVID relief. The debt will cause stock market to go up = 1 trillion every 100 days.

  • @katienolan6834
    @katienolan6834 2 місяці тому +2

    I would like to see Howell paired with someone up to his caliber of speaking. George may have good arguments, I don’t know enough about economics to say, but it was difficult to follow his chain of logic and his exasperated tone at times wasn’t helping.

    • @user-mn8ul9bf2g
      @user-mn8ul9bf2g 2 місяці тому +1

      It seems he realized early on he's outmatched and tried to be condescending which exposed his weak arguments even more.

  • @ivivivir
    @ivivivir 2 місяці тому

    If I have to 'believe', I prefer Michael as he has something to explain coherently. On the other hand, George only tries to link things that come to his mind as some type of pseudo theory.

  • @bobk6549
    @bobk6549 2 місяці тому +1

    George Robertson really does a poor job explaining his point of view.

  • @jeffc6745
    @jeffc6745 2 місяці тому

    7.5 trillion isn’t liquidity?

  • @GrantLeeEdwards
    @GrantLeeEdwards 2 місяці тому +2

    George always brings the cowbell. 👏

  • @nonexistent5030
    @nonexistent5030 2 місяці тому

    Ray Dalio of the largest macro hedgefund rarely discusses such arcane notions as liquidity. ...but were to believe its a useful notion because these two guys made a prediction, were lucky enough to be right, and used the word to support their thinking... mmmmhhhmm

  • @TLynx-is4jd
    @TLynx-is4jd 2 місяці тому

    Was checking out $ICP , that shit is insane,

  • @stoneyj1a1
    @stoneyj1a1 2 місяці тому +1

    This guy is wise but he talks in circles and uses a lot of jargon. Hard to make sense and understand his point.
    Howell speaks more to the layman.

  • @jeffc6745
    @jeffc6745 2 місяці тому

    There is no Fed effectively?! Tell that to people that are trying to be a home.

    • @garrettpatten6312
      @garrettpatten6312 26 днів тому

      It goes deeper than the interest rate - the only reason peoples "savings" must be represented in their nominal home price is because they keep ruining the money. If I knew I could start saving for a 300k house now it would still be 300k by the time I had saved up enough to buy it, there would be no rush to lock up 2k every month in a mortage for the next 30 fking years. I would save and invest and watch that money grow and be able to buy the house much faster - can't do that though, because by the time the average joe saves 300k the same house is worth 700k. By the time you save that it's worth 1.5 million. Maybe if no new homes are built the demand goes up do to scarcity, but it's basically shrinkflation. Homes are as shitty or worse as they've been since the 60s. What has changed in housing to justify these extreame price tags? Absolutely nothing. But because we can't just save the actual money, people are buying houses they don't need, locking all that capital up in the home and screwing over new families - all because they keep devaluing the currency.

  • @toltecsam8776
    @toltecsam8776 2 місяці тому

    So George says "Money Printer" doesn't matter? BS.

  • @prism7287
    @prism7287 2 місяці тому

    You always need an intellectual argument, George destroys it. It is more American vs non American thing to come up with models and explanations, maybe. You can't unsee what George said(King is powerful, nacked and does what it says). Thanks Jack.

  • @tonyb7275
    @tonyb7275 2 місяці тому

    So no more crashes no bear markets, a never ending bull market hmmmm, ok good luck with that

  • @TheJohnsonseviltwin
    @TheJohnsonseviltwin 2 місяці тому

    George seems super hung up on terminology...ie "It's not liquidity it's Money". One and the same George.