Does Noj Rants do good research?

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 5 лют 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 21

  • @vispian7688
    @vispian7688 4 години тому +4

    Noj is one of my all time favourites history channels. Remember when he first started focusing on Societ History before you started this series. And mentioned you as a reference point when it comes to polemical/cross referencing over bad history youtubers

  • @Topheragger
    @Topheragger 6 годин тому +7

    You should do an episode with/ on bad empanada, I really would love a deep dive into his research process or a scholarly dismantlement of his sources if that is more appropriate

    • @Kitsune2Megafan1086
      @Kitsune2Megafan1086 6 годин тому +6

      I would like to see that.

    • @veritasetcaritas
      @veritasetcaritas  5 годин тому +7

      His main channel generally has excellent research, but I have called out one of his videos for errors.
      ua-cam.com/video/wwemi8qoGzo/v-deo.html

    • @veritasetcaritas
      @veritasetcaritas  5 годин тому +4

      You might like this.
      ua-cam.com/video/wwemi8qoGzo/v-deo.html

  • @randomchannel-px6ho
    @randomchannel-px6ho 10 годин тому +21

    Bro stop reading my mind

  • @scottshapton
    @scottshapton 10 годин тому +7

    I don't have 2 hours to watch this today, and probably won't for many weeks. Please take this like as thanks for putting the answer in the thumbnail.

  • @firstnamelastname1148
    @firstnamelastname1148 15 хвилин тому

    Goat discussing Goat

  • @Topheragger
    @Topheragger 5 годин тому +3

    1:25:30 tikhistory does have an undergraduate degree in history. I would assume that means that he was ‘taught that method’. He has a series of videos on historiography in which he lays out in excruciating detail his qualms with the modern historical method and presents his own methodology through which he analyses history (I can’t be bothered to tell you what differences he makes because firstly I’m not a historian and I myself don’t know the academic standard and secondly it’s a lengthy video) I would assume that he perhaps makes some of his mistakes as a consequence of his fringe perspective on historical analysis and methodology and historiography.

    • @veritasetcaritas
      @veritasetcaritas  5 годин тому +1

      Yes very definitely. I may critique those historiography videos of his in the future. I've watched them all

  • @MilkJugA_
    @MilkJugA_ 6 годин тому +4

    I appreciate this discussion, I really enjoy both these channels :)

  • @Ma_ksi
    @Ma_ksi 11 годин тому +2

    The videos after the Narodnik Lenin one, yes

    • @jsmedia-ww6gb
      @jsmedia-ww6gb 10 годин тому +10

      If you watch the video, it's not arguing that there was a "Narodnik Lenin", but saying that there were other types of socialists in Russia in addition to Marxism, which all had an impact on Lenin's thinking growing up.

    • @Ma_ksi
      @Ma_ksi 10 годин тому +1

      @@jsmedia-ww6gb Wait did I misremember??? I though he argues that Lenin never left the ideas he had from when he was a Narodnik. Arguing that he was more of a Narodnik then a Marxist.

    • @gb4206
      @gb4206 9 годин тому +7

      I dont think he said "lenin is more a narodnik than a marxist" but that lenin retained some narodnik ideas after identifying as marxist

    • @jsmedia-ww6gb
      @jsmedia-ww6gb 9 годин тому +9

      @Ma_ksi Quote from the video: " I am not personally taking the position that Lenin wasn't a Marxist. Rather this video is to investigate why people accuse him of such, and especially to explore the other writings which could have influenced Lenin's thinking while growing up, in addition to Marx. Being inspired by other sources, or having certain beliefs prior to Marxism, don't disqualify you from being a Marxist ipso facto."

    • @Tvlogs22
      @Tvlogs22 9 годин тому +4

      @Ma_ksi Nah at no point does he say Lenin was a Narodnik, just that he grew up in that milieu. It's like pointing out that Marx read Hegel and was inspired by him.