Seiko SKX 173

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 30 вер 2024
  • The SKX 173 from Seiko is an excellent example of a good quality divers watch at a modest price point. The example in this video dates from c. Dec 2004.
    As an interesting aside as to how tough it is my poor watch suffered thru the following:
    1. fell off a nighstand (the floor was carpeted)
    2. it was dropped accidently onto the floor while I was sitting on a bus.
    3. I once tumbled down 3 steps rushing thru an airport and the lug of the watch impacted with the ground.
    After all of the above watch never stopped running :)
    Misc: Seiko mineral glass crystal goes by the trade name of "Hardlex".

КОМЕНТАРІ • 22

  • @voiceofexperience
    @voiceofexperience 7 років тому +2

    Being made for the US market, the county of manufacture must be stated on the watch. This (2004) example was made in Singapore, while the current (2016) version is made in Malaysia.

  • @MrSilvervw
    @MrSilvervw 7 років тому +2

    can you go more in to depth between Malaysia, Singapore, and Japan no one on youtube has done it. keep up the good work your videos are awesome.

    • @369168
      @369168  7 років тому +3

      to the best of my knowledge, the movements are idemtical. However some dial variants may be Japan only. Among the watch collecting community, there is more "prestige" attached to a Seiko that says "Japan Mov't. As far as the reason for multiple factories in differently locations around the world, I would imagine that factors such as cost of production, points of distribution, etc enter into the picture.

  • @repo4
    @repo4 6 років тому +1

    Accuracy pretty good? You are in the COSC territory with that piece. Good review.

    • @369168
      @369168  6 років тому

      I got lucky adjusting this. It took me a few tries before I got it to my satisfaction. I wore this watch to the Canadian Rockies last yr (just a bit of trivia). thanks for watching !

  • @brianhinder3652
    @brianhinder3652 8 років тому +1

    Thank you for reviewing other than a Turtle or 007/9.

  • @846524162
    @846524162 8 років тому +1

    love your reviews my friend, always very interesting and I like your style of reviewing the watch. Do you see any Seiko Tuna in your near future?

    • @369168
      @369168  8 років тому

      +Crater777 No Tuna in the foreseeable future but never say never :) thanks for tuning in again :)

  • @alittleolder
    @alittleolder 8 років тому

    Hi, I came upon your reviews by coincidence. I did watch every single one since yesterday. Are you maybe on watchuseek so we could converse a bit?

  • @xXSauceBawsXx
    @xXSauceBawsXx 6 років тому

    is it me or the lumes are more white than other skx173, I've seen other 173 on other videos and pictures, they were more yellow/greenish.

    • @369168
      @369168  6 років тому

      my background lighting was very bright so I guess it makes the lume more white looking ?

  • @johnvalatos4073
    @johnvalatos4073 8 років тому

    Thank you for the review. This watch is like the SKX007 with different markers and seconds hand. I like the seconds hand on this watch. I have the 007 with that same oyster bracelet.

    • @369168
      @369168  8 років тому

      +John Valatos I considered the one with the solid links but felt that it might have been overkill for a watch with such a modest price point. Thanks for wtching

  • @alexanderw49
    @alexanderw49 8 років тому

    Great review! You should definitely do more!

    • @369168
      @369168  8 років тому +1

      thanks! will do my best to keep'em coming thanks for watching :)

  • @nunomc2815
    @nunomc2815 8 років тому

    Great objective review, as usual. Can you, please, inform me what's the main difference between this timepiece and its "brother" SKX007 ? They look ident at first sight.

    • @369168
      @369168  8 років тому +2

      +Nuno MC the shape of the minute indices and where the position of the second hands dot is placed differs on the skx007 . Google some images of the SKX 007 and you'll see what I mean. Thanks again for tuning in :)

    • @nunomc2815
      @nunomc2815 8 років тому

      +NO BULLS**T WRISTWATCH REVIEWS I thank you very much for your nice reply and great reviews 😊👍

  • @tippersteffi1
    @tippersteffi1 5 років тому

    Great watch for the price

    • @369168
      @369168  5 років тому

      Agreed. Looks good, sturdily built, reliable durable moment that can be adjusted to a good level if accuracy, more than enough water resistance, comfortable to wear and has a day and date.. what more can you ask for ?

  • @JamesMinerTattoo
    @JamesMinerTattoo 8 років тому

    Glad to see a new review!

    • @369168
      @369168  8 років тому +1

      +James Miner thanks for patiently waiting for my new videos and for your continued viewership :)