These debates are investigative science that eventually will help Civilization to Destroy & Neutralize FOREVER the Roots of the Armies of Jihad that are camouflaged as "religion" to muck at NAIVE Judges & Politicians.. Movies are properly rated for its Level of Violence, but JIHAD is more protected than Winnie the Poo or Dr Zeus... 🧐
From the foregoing, it is becoming crystal clear that the Umayyad of the 7th century were Christians but not Moslems as SIN would have us believe. It follows, therefore, that if there we're no Moslems in the 7th century', there could have been no Quran in that century.
Careful, Daniel, there was almost certainly a Quran at the time of the Umayyads- however, it would not resemble the Quran of today. Today’s Quran has been designed and re-interpreted to legitimize the Abbasid rule and reign.
@Kilian Klaiber As the Quran makes little sense on its own without the Hadith and Sunnah, you’d have to imagine they were interpolations to create a holy book, a prophet and a religion that otherwise didn’t exist as described in the later Muslim literature and narrative.
@@jameswbuchananjr The Umayyads were a part of the 7th century Christology debate. The Quran is likely a series of poetic attempts to draw Arabic Christians or Arabs in general into the Umayyad Christian sect. Perhaps, as Joe has stated on his site, the Quran is with us today as the Syriac Lectionary. The Quran, as we know it, is a poetic “promotion” to embrace the Lectionary and the Umayyad brand of Christianity. Interested in what folks might think?
There was the Marwanid Qur'an which was based on an earlier collection of Judeo-Arabic Liturgical Dramas written by Judeo-Hagarenes who had adopted a Monophysite belief in Jesus. The authors were devout Trinitarians but they opposed adoptionism.
I am happy that Jews are chipping in to this debate about how Islam started. They should have joined in a long time ago. Their help in unpacking the Islamic ideology is sorely needed.
The 10 Best Things of Islam: *10* . The certainty that God loves you. *9* . Clear moral guidance and rules that exalt the best of our human nature, as we are made in the image of God, such as - do not kill, - do not steal, - do not lie, - do not commit adultery, - do not covet your neighbor's wife or possessions, and - forgive those who wrong you. *8* . A sanctified institution of marriage; which is the indissoluble union of a man and a woman; in which husband and wife become one flesh, are equal, and are both commanded to love, honor and respect one another. *7* .The promise of eternal life in loving union with God. *6* . A command from God to love your fellow human beings -- i.e. to want them good -- and to live in peace and harmony with them all, irrespective of their sexual orientation, faith, race, gender... *5* . A command from God to even love your enemies, i.e. to want them good! *4* . The certainty that God loves every human being as a father loves His children, irrespective of their faith, sexual orientation, gender, race... *3* . A command from God for you not to judge others or punish them, but to forgive them; because if anybody deserved punisment, God will punish them, not you. *2* . Beautiful and rich religious rituals which are celebrations of life, are meant to glorify and give thanks to a loving God, and are thus full of joy and are often accompanied with marvellous chants and wonderful music. *1* . A role model Who you can follow with your eyes closed, because He was pure and committed no sin; so in following Him you can make no error. Well, to be precise: these would be the ten best things of Islam if they were actually things of Islam, but they are not. Not at all. None of them is a thing of Islam. But they are all things of Christianity. These are some of the good things of Christianity. Accept Jesus as your Lord and Saviour. In Jesus you will find truth, love, beauty and eternal life.
HELLO!!!! ISLAM means a person WHO SUBMITS TO HIS CREATOR and all the prophets of God SUBMITTED TO THEIR CREATOR without partners, persons (pagan trinity) and intercessors, making them ALL MUSLIM by definition. Mohammad (saw) COMPLETED the religion that started with creation andall the Prophets of God. Here is a Jewish Prof, not to be biased. ua-cam.com/video/tw2UbF01BSw/v-deo.html ua-cam.com/video/GJLtu9qpuC4/v-deo.html
@@fantasia55 Where do you come on this - from the Evil missionaries...??? Jesus called the Creator Allah - Alaha in did Aramaic language. GET YOURSEF EDUCATED as you are making a fool of yourself.
The Abbasid Narrative is a monumental act of Government "spin-doctoring", sleight of hand and misdirection. The Sassanians used a text designed to attack them in order to strengthen their position while also diminishing its importance. Extremely Machiavellian and alarm g to see how easily the population can be manipulated as long as it happens slowly over a long period of time.
There is so much more still yet to be recorded. Such as the earliest use of the Arabic word Muhammad which was only in Jewish context 100 years before the new Arab calendar began.
Yes, all the evidence is pointing to this truth. Muhammad morphed from being a title of the Christ, to an entirely different person in an entirely different [tweaked] faith.
Christianity believes in the trinity. It was never Chrustian. Jews don't accept Jesus. It's also not Judaism. It's islam. It's as simple as that. Even the dome of the rock inscription says the deen is Islam.
@@alonzoharris6730 How can it be Islam when Abdel Malik was depicted in a coin wearing a Christian Cross on his head?. Same thing with another supposedly Islamic caliph Muawiyah who was also shown with a Christian Cross in another coin. Islam was invented by Arab Christians that didn't identify with certain practices of Judaism and Christianity.
The little girl wrote a TRUTH: GOD IS EVERYTHING! While Pantheism denies GOD to welcome Universal Forces. But King David said: -"GOD IS MY SHEPHERD, I WOULD NOT BE NEEDY." Because GOD is everything and HE Stablished & Controls Universal Forces to inspire Scientists, Artists and SMART children.
Excellent work you guys , I mean JS, Joe and AlFadi at this critical time such wonderful points need to reach millions in the middleast and else where Thak God
Christian Prince has mentioned multiple times that, from a simple Arabic reading of the the Quran, the text never really attacked the a traditional understanding of the Trinity. He say that the Quran refers to tri-theism. Very interesting work.
That was epic guys, I think Joe hit the nail on this one, going back to the 7th century the temple mount ( the Rock ) was all about the Jews mainly I doubt Christians would look at the site as been in God presents as its not idols or temples we worship we can pray to God anywhere any direction at any time, Jews however go to these places which is why I recon Joe hits the nail as it confronts them. We know Islam copies the Jewish traditions hence they both share the resting place of Abraham. So thanks Joe You are spot on and seeing from the eyes of a Jew it makes perfect sense. I'm not taking away what Thomas and Mel and others view see it we all need to see the alternatives between both Christian and Jews respective this is directed to the Jews in the area as Christians would not even visit this place as it has no bearing on our belief... Could be wrong but Joe makes a good point...
yes the temple mount has been destroyed as God intends to in the new testament. So we Christians should not push to any rebuild of the jewish temple. As we already have our own bloodless sacrifice.
There is no historical evidence for the temple of Solomon in Jerusalem. Not a single rock is found. Joe should start with the Christian and Jewish Standard narratives first.😊 There were no camels in the Levant in the time of Abraham or Moses. Camels were only found in What is now Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Eastern Arabia. The bible claims that there were camels in Arabia. Abraham was in Arabia and not in the Levant. The Chaldean didn't exist in the time of Moses either. They translated Kasdim as Chaldeans. The Chaldeans only came after 900 bce. Moses lived in 1400 bce. Abraham lived in 2000 bce. There is a lot of deception going on with translations into Greek and English. The Hebrews are from Yemen and not from the Levant. The deception started with the translation of the Canaanite text into Greek with the Septaguint in Alexandria. They started to make Egypt and the Levant the centre of the OT stories with made up translations. River became Nile.🤔 It's also assumed that UrShalim (Jerusalem) is always the same city in the OT. That's totally false. It simply means the city of peace. The earliest historical record of Jerusalem is from an Arab king called Abdi Heba in the Amarna letters. There is zero archaeological evidence for the temple of Solomon. It's even funnier that nobody ever documented a temple there. Alexander the Great never heard of it. The later stories of Josephus are all legends. The clown wrote that the pagan Roman Flavius leaders healed people. The Greeks passed through that strategic area and made Egypt the centre of their kingdom. No mention of a temple or Jerusalem. Nothing is found. The biblical Jesus says in Matthew 24 that no stone will be left. Josephus the Roman propagandist wrote that the temple was completely destroyed. Eusebius wrote that the temple was completely destroyed. There is no evidence found of one single piece of a Roman fortress where the Romans stayed in Jerusalem? Do you know why? Because the temple mount was the Roman fortress.😁 It has exactly the same shape as other Roman fortresses. It has the same dimensions. One example is not far away. The Roman fortress of Masada has the same dimensions. Something fishy is going on. Thank you Jay. You inspired me to a do a deep dive into the bible.👍🏼 I'm a scuba diver.🏊♂️ Where in Jerusalem was the 10th Roman legion? The Standard Christian Narrative is that it's a tiny small building outside the temple mount. The 10th Roman legion was at least 6000 men soldiers. We should count at least 3000 more which makes it almost 10000. 10000 people in a tiny building is impossible. It's a joke to believe that the Romans would give the Jews an entire strategic mount and they take in a small building outside the wall lol. The Romans are not stupid. The Wall is a Roman wall. It's the most strategic location in the city for soldiers. That's what the Romans did in every location. They build fortresses witj wall on strategic locations. Can you do a deep dive into this Joe?😊
@@alonzoharris6730 ,As the site for a future temple, David chose Mount Moriah, or the Temple Mount, where it was believed Abraham had built the altar on which to sacrifice his son Isaac. The First Temple was constructed during the reign of David's son, Solomon, and completed in 957 BC. It was apparently Abd al-Malik himself who began the work of replacing the nearby wooden structure built by Umar with the magnificent silver-domed stone mosque Al Aqsa. Its construction was to be completed by his son, Caliph Al-Walid I, in the beginning of the 8th century. The area was claimed by the waqf as a space that served in earlier Islamic periods as a place of prayer, but some saw the move as a part of a "political agenda" and a "pretext" for the Islamization of the underground space, and believed it had been instigated to prevent the site being used a synagogue for Jewish Just what was it that the Knights Templar found beneath the ruins of Solomon’s Temple? Was it a vast amount of buried treasure? Was it the location of the Ark of the Covenant? Or was it, as some firmly believe to this day, the Holy Grail? Believed to be constructed around the mid-10th Century BCE on an elevated area of ground in Jerusalem that would later come to be known as Temple Mount, Solomon’s Temple was said to be Phoenician in design. A magnificent, white marble and gold-covered building, the temple contained three chambers consisting of an outer vestibule, the main chamber and the ‘Holy of Holies’. The Holy of Holies was a small antechamber at the back of the temple where the Ark of the Covenant was traditionally thought to be kept. The Ark, as any Indiana Jones aficionado will tell you, contained two stone tablets on which were written the Ten Commandments. The jury’s still out on whether it also contained face-melting avenging angels. At the entrance to the temple stood two twenty-seven-foot-high brass pillars adorned with ornately decorated capitals. The pillars were known as Boaz and Jachin, and they stood either side of the door that led to the temple’s vestibule. Replicas of Boaz and Jachin - which in Hebrew mean ‘In Him is strength’ and ‘He will establish’ respectively - can be found in most Masonic lodges. Hiram Abiff, the chief architect of the temple, is an important figure in Freemasonry, and the order’s lodges are referred to as ‘temples’ in honor of Abiff’s greatest creation. The Temple of Solomon was not just a place of worship, but also one of ritual animal sacrifice and bizarre practices such as ‘sacred prostitution’, where pilgrims could pay to use the services of temple prostitutes who would ‘cleanse’ them of their sins by partaking in religiously sanctioned sexual intercourse. Sacred prostitution has been called into doubt by some historians who dispute the practice ever took place. The temple met its end in 587 BCE when the armies of King Nebuchadnezzar II besieged the city of Jerusalem. The city was razed to the ground and the temple, which had stood for nearly five hundred years, was completely destroyed. The Ark of the Covenant has never seen again, had it ever existed in the first place. A second, much more modest temple arose from the ashes of the first in 516 BCE. This temple would be vastly altered and turned into a huge and magnificent temple complex by Herod the Great, the king who is perhaps best known from his appearance in the Bible wherein he orders the so-called ‘Massacre of the Innocents’ at the time of the birth of Jesus Christ. Herod’s temple would eventually be destroyed by the Roman Empire in 70 BCE in retaliation for the Jewish Revolt that saw most of Jerusalem - the second temple included - reduced to rubble. Following the end of Roman rule, the Temple Mount and the ruins of the second temple were used as a huge rubbish dump for the next six hundred years. It wasn’t until the city was in Muslim hands under Caliph Abd al-Malik that the site was cleared in order that a mosque could be built in 691 CE. The mosque, known as the Dome of the Rock, would eventually be joined by the nearby Al-Aqsa mosque, completed in 705 CE. The Dome of the Rock famously stands over the Foundation Stone - a huge slab of rough bedrock on which the Jews believe Abraham attempted to sacrifice his son Isaac. It was over this stone that the Muslims built their mosque. Today, the Dome of the Rock is the third holiest shrine in Islam after Mecca and Medina. So you can see here how the Knight Temple's robbed temples they were later punished once captured those who survived started up a new group Knights of Christ, then the Freemasons all spin offs from Islam they even use the crescent moon as a symbol, not sure on Freemasons but if you watch the curse of Oak Island they believe the knight Temple's buried treasure there on the Island before been captured, the evidence points back to them, also Freemasons have had a role in it as one of them brought the Island many years ago. We Christians don't care much about sites of history that was then we now have Jesus but don't get me wrong this was history and played a part of history, good to know how we revolved to bad Islam is stuck in the 7th century bubble.. Its interesting hearing other points, like the cave below the Dome which Solomon built to store treasure and how people add things like well of the souls, I believe this is where Umar your Muhammad was getting Revelations from for his prototype quran you know the one they kicked around after stabbing Umar your prophet, he was the one after dying ascended into heaven not this crazy story from mecca, Mount Moriah is one of the mountain well rocks they built in mecca to copy the Jewish stories, a blind man can see how Islam revolved, peace out.
The part on "say not three" was fabulous! I've thought of that before, wondering if this is what was meant, but it's wonderful to hear it. We are in a great time.
mahmad in this case is an adjective about the archangel - something that had been said for a 1000 years in a similar order (or predicate verb?) and the jews of the time would have been confused since it is a usage of words in such a way that had a close and personal meaning that already existed in their language and culture i also want to point out that daal, raa, 'Haa, are different and can all be confused for each other between this character style and the next. the closed haa is surprisingly exactly as it is today and looked altered for some reason. a script written in straight strokes suddenly has a perfect circular curve...? hmmm.
I'm sorry, I'm sorry! Jay, Joe, Brother Al Fadi: I'm only 51 seconds into this video and SUDDENLY, a memory floats up from the Challenger Deep of my brain: _ it was my third class with an ancient, half blind, Jesuit, exegesis professor, who loved cognac, blue cheese and dark chocolate; _we hear the tap, tap, tap of his cane as he walks from the stairwell door, down the hall and into the classroom; _he tap, tap, taps his way over to the lectern, takes off one pair of very dark glasses, puts on another, very thick pair of clear glasses, peers his face down to the page, the tip of his nose is almost touching the papers on the lectern, he straightens up, softly clears his throat, and says: "A Jew, a Christian and a Muslim, half way through Ramadan, a couple of days after Easter and Passover, and after sundown, walk into a bar...", his voice trailed off as soon as we all burst out laughing. He waits till we've all quieted down and are once again composed, and then he said: "If you stay for the second half of my lecture, at the end, I'll tell you the rest of the joke." I want to thank you, on a day when the news from Europe is grim, for making me smile, remembering the antics of an old professor, who died long ago.
AA Abrams is partially correct. This Judaic approach is my own which I have been working on since 1996 and has been worked on my Judaix experts for hundreds of years. It has nothing to do with what others have been saying although many of the ideas that others use are harvested from the Judaix perspective.
Not in our lifetime. Whenever archeologists dig anywhere in the vicinity of the Temple Mount, the entire Muslim world starts screaming (falsely) that Israel is trying to undermine the mosque. Of course, no excavation in the mount itself is possible.
Yes the Islamusts themselves have been scraping off all the archaeology they can from the surface and taking truckloads of valuable archaeological evidence off to dumpsites.
Red Judaism could make his case so much better if he produced more PowerPoint slides to go with his presentation. He makes excellent discoveries and offers amazing insights
Jay u need to ask Joe to get a bigger curser coz when he's talking & saying over here & over there it's so so hard to see this tiny little arrow, I ended up having to cast the vid to my 55" Television Just to see what he's pointing out & not everyone will have this option
so from my understanding including previous videos joe is saying that quran never attacks trinity but only attacks theophany, trimurti, and adoptionism. am i right?
The Quran does not attack trinity nor theophany. In fact the Quran heavily promotes Jesus as the unity of the three Theophanies. But you are correct it attacks trimurty and adoptionism, yes.
@@Bei-Abedan STOP YOUR LIES The Quran is clear who Jesus is "the son of Mary and that he was a messenger of God" and God is NOT A 3RD. [Surah An-Nisa; 4:171]
Hi Joe. Great work. You mentioned the word Muhammad on the inscription on dome of the rock refers to Temple Mount, How would you explain the coins with inscription of Muhammad on them?
Shalom, I'm sorry there is a misunderstanding. I was trying to say that many Jews would have been familiar with Ezekiel 24 where the word MHMD is used to refer to the Presence of the Lord in the Holy of Holies (where the Dome now is) but that the inscription is saying that only Jesus is the Temple. So the coins are depicting Jesus.
@@Bei-Abedan honestly your findings and research on pre Islam should be published in a scholarly book. The missing link is how the Abbasid Islam was created, who were the creators, what motivated them, who is Muhammad, how he became a figure of prophecy, why Mecca became the fabricated center of the story? The truth must outshine all deadly fears Islam casts on its followers for doubting and leaving Islam.
@@joecarbone2316 I can't afford to self-publish and there aren't many publishers who would take the risk on publishing such a book right now. But if you come across one please do let me know. In the meantime, you might enjoy subscribing to my channel where many of the topics you mentioned are frequently discussed.
Please help me here: Are you telling us that the “Dome of the Rock” located in Jerusalem was built by Christians (Heretical Christians - the Umayyads) to confront (challenge) Jewish Scriptures? If so, it is starting to make sense as to why Muslims chose another place (Mecca) for their holy site - a location that cannot support the Quran both geographically and archeologically.
STOP WITH YOUR IDIOCY...HA HA HA Believing the Evil missionaries about Islam... The Umayyads weren't Heretical xtians... The Umayyads were the first Muslim dynasty, established in 661 in Damascus. Their dynasty succeeded the leadership of the first four caliphs-Abū Bakr, ʿUmar I, ʿUthmān, and ʿAlī. first great Muslim dynasty to rule the empire of the caliphate (661-750 CE). The Umayyads, headed by Abū Sufyān, were a largely merchant family of the Quraysh tribe centred at Mecca. IF these lies were true what those Evil missionaries say, ' tthe Umayyads were Heretical xtians' - they would have discarded Mecca and Medina and made Jerusalem the centre of Islam.
Yes Christ Above All. I am only referring to the Dome and not to Al Aqsa. But why should we call them heretical since they believed in Jesus and in the trinity?
Catholic Church never considers her Ortodox brothers as heretical. The schism was more political than dogmatic. Thomas Alexander interpretation of the DOTR was from anti-trinitarian pov, maybe due to anti-trinitarian nature of the quran, so he assumed that the muawiyah must have been anti-trinitarian. I think Joe had a clearer interpretation of the DOTR inscriptions from the linguistic pov that perfectly matched oriental Orthodox pov, against the Judeo-nazarene heresy. The Church of the Holy Sepulchre was (Roman) Catholic and DOTR temple was rebuilt by Orthodox. I would guess the al aqsa next door was actually an Orthodox Church.
@@AndiWidjaja The whole point of my series is to show that the Umayyad texts are trinitarian Monophysite far from anti-trinitarian. Not Eastern Orthodox but Oriental Orthodox against the Judeo-Nazarene Adoptionism (Nestorianism).
*Amazing! Thank you Al Fadi, Jay and Joe!* *Thank you for your time and dedication to finding out the truth!* Hmm ... Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan building the Dome of the Rock on the site of the Holy of Holies thereby casting shade on Judaism. And at the same time building the Dome at the place of one of the highest elevations in the city of Jerusalem; therefore towering over the Church of the Holy Sepulchre (aka: Church of the Resurrection) as well as the rest of the city. Although the Temple Mount and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre are some distance from each other. The CoHS was controlled by the Eastern Orthodox Church; the state church of the Eastern Roman/Byzantine empire; that practiced Nicene (Trinitarian) Christianity (the only legal form of Christianity in the Roman/Byzantine empire. *Hadrian did something similar when he defeated the Jews during the Bar Kokhba revolt* (aka: Third Jewish- Roman War ...132--136 CE) Hadrian had visited Jerusalem in either 129 or 130 CE and stated that he was going to rebuild the city. His visit and the ensuing taxation to rebuild the city were two of the several factors in the Bar Kokhba revolt After the Bar Kokhba revolt the rebuilding of the city of Jerusalem continued and Hadrian renamed the city: "Aelia Capitolina." The Jewish Temple was not rebuilt (It had been destroyed in 70 CE during the First Jewish- Roman war, ... 66--74 CE) Hadrian ordered a temple and statue of Zeus (Jupiter) to be placed on the site of the Jewish temple He also ordered a temple to Venus (Aphrodite) to be built over the site of Christ's tomb (to insult the very small Christian population, whom Hadrian considered to be a dangerous offshoot of Judaism). In addition, since the youths of Samaria had joined in the Bar Kokhba revolt; a statue of Zeus was placed on Mount Gerizim. (i.e. the Samaritan's holy place)
@@Bei-Abedan what you were verbally translating, English alongside the Arabic text. This would've made it easier to follow along with your commentary. Hope that makes my point clearer :)
MHMD is the temple of the body of Christ. Hence the temolars were dedicated to MHMD (not to any Arabian prophet which they were falsely accused of by their rivals).
That's a compelling case. I will be adding to that later by bringing in AJ Deus' interpretation that it is against the theology of a specific Jewish figure purporting to be the Messiah in the 16th century. For context, we need to establish when exactly the inscriptions were created. See upcoming series on this channel.
What do you think of the theory that the original pre Islamic devotion for the rock under the dome of the rock was Christian? I read that the anonymous Piacenza pilgrim (570’s) went to a church there above Mount Zion where the rock on which Christ stood during his judgment by Pilate is revered. He even described the footprints Christ left in the rock as being slender and graceful. I looked into it and found that there was a Byzantine church around that rock named Hagia Sophia which the Persians had destroyed in their invasion of 614. Could it be that Abdul Malik has the ambulatory inscribed with anti Christian or at least anti Chacedonian Christian engravings because pilgrims there would have associated that location with Christ? I find it interesting that there are traditions till today that there are Mohammed’s footprints in the rock as well.
The Mahmad is a Hebrew word for "the beloved" which is a reference to the sacred temple of God (the Temple Mount and the Holiest of Holies), but which Christians understand to be Jesus. Recall that after driving out the money-changers, "The Jews then responded to him, asking “What sign can you show us to prove your authority to do all this?” Jesus answered them, “Destroy this temple, and I will raise it again in three days.” - John 2:18-19
To mister Jay: You are right "politics" is very important in this regard, but in you saying this, you actually strengthen Joe's claim. If Abdul Malik ruled over the Umayyad kingdom, as a monophysite king, then he understood the same thing that Roman Christian caesars understood, which is that in order for his rule to be politically stable, he absolutely must bring the Jews to accept Jesus and Christianity. That is exactly what Joe explained. Abdul Malik used that spot, to try and explain to the Jews the 'Monophysite Trinity' in a way Jews could understand and therefore accept and thus come to Christianity... for the BENEFIT POLITICAL STABILITY for Abdul Malik's rule.
@@annemurphy9339 I don't understand. Why couldn't have he tried to sway his Jewish subjects to accept Jesus and the monophysite Trinity? More importantly, why wouldn't he?
I am not sure quite where to post this but I hope this is OK!... The Elder of Ziyon blogspot has an interesting article (including photos and links) _Why did the Muslims put a menorah on their coins? Could be to symbolize Islamic supremacy._ , in which the author (thinking from the perspective of the current SIN) mentions several interesting points: “….Some Muslim coins used "visual puns" where a different picture would be seen upside down than right side up. Back in 2013, I mentioned that coin collectors had noted (link) that the upside down version of the Muslim menorah resembles the Dome of the Rock, with the two-pronged Islamic crescent on top (photo)….This could account for the changes to the menorah appearance to look more dome-like….A few years after my post, some Israeli researchers came to the same conclusion (link), which was debated in certain circles. But a new proof for the upside down theory came from the discovery of an important inscription (link) that was found in Nuba, near Hebron, in 2016: (photo) ‘A team of archaeologists revealed the existence of a 1000-year-old text, dated to the beginning of the Islamic era, which indicates that the Muslims perceived the Dome of the Rock as a reestablishment of the earlier Jewish Temple. They referred to it as “Bayt al-maqdis” in the inscription, which derives from the biblical Hebrew terminology as ‘Beit Hamikdash’, known as the Hebrew reference to the Holy Temple.’ Turning the coins upside down could easily symbolize replacing the Jewish Temple, represented by the menorah, with the Dome of the Rock where early Muslims performed their own Temple-like rituals - and called it the "Bayt al-Maqdis," a term that later on started referring to all of Jerusalem….”
Rasul = Rashel = Archangel ??? The term “archangel,” which denotes an angel of high rank who commands other angels, doesn’t actually have a Hebrew equivalent in Jewish Scriptures. The book of Daniel, however, mentions two angels by name, Gabriel and Michael, and refers to Michael as a SAR, which means “prince” or “minister.” The term “minister” seems an apt description of what differentiates angels like Michael and Gabriel from the unnamed angels we encounter throughout the Bible, starting from Genesis. In the Midrash, Michael is called the “prince of kindness (chessed) and water” and Gabriel “the prince of severity (gevurah) and fire. Rasul means messanger not archangel
dear joe why is it that the so many jews in all the 2000 years of histpry have never spoken a word so far ? please give proofs for all your ground shaking new informations .
Spoke a word on what? We still dont believe in jesus (Joe does not represent us on this) You never asked, you christians/muslims conviced yourselves you are our successors and you wanted to teach us what our (not yours) scriptures say, you wanted to force us, you thought we are your pets.
@@Danielst15lm Hey shut the hell up blood idiot we christians popularized your torah and trust me when it comes to the defence of the torah you idiots are nowhere to be found i love jewish people for their preservation of my torah but stupid people like you spoil their name.
When you gonna research on following Quranic account on previous historical events Quran’s rhetoric that never changed Quran (600 plus pages) has memorized by millions of Muslims Quran has only one version Prophet Muhammad PBUM name mentioned in Torah and New Testament Most of the Rabis in prophet Muhammad PBUM times testified the coming of the last prophet in Arabia as it is mentioned in Torah And the list goes on and on. Remember I am waiting… And Allah is all wise and knows better.
The eternal Word of God (Kalimatullah) was made flesh by the Ruh Al-Qudus into The Temple (Body of Christ). It was destroyed and rebuilt in three days.
*Matthew* *7: 13,14* *14 Go in through the narrow gate; for WIDE is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth unto DESTRUCTION, and MANY are they which go in thereon.14 For the gate is NARROW, and the strait is the way, which leadeth unto LIFE, and FEW there be that find it.* *A.* *Timothy* *2: 4,5* *4 GOD wants all people to be saved and to know the TRUTH. 5 For there is one GOD, and one MEDITATOR between GOD and men, the MAN CHRIST JESUS;* *Revelation of John* *3:14* *14 And unto the angel of the church in Laodicea write; Thus saith the AMEN, the FAITHFUL and TRUE WITNESS. the beginning of the CREATION of GOD.* "ARE MANY" who will follow the path of loss but "A FEW" will find the narrow gate. Mattew 7:13 John 3:13 (Jesus said)No one ascended into heaven. but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which was from the heaven. Why do we grow old and die? GOD did not want humans to die. Our first parents, Adam and Eve, were created with a perfect mind and body.They could still be alive today.This is clear from what God said to Adam about a tree growing in the garden of Eden. God said to Adam:“The day you eat [from the tree] you will surely die.” Genesis 2:17. This command would have been meaningless if Adam had been created to grow old and die. Adam knew that if he did not eat from that tree, he would not die. GOD'S PURPOSE WAS NOT THAT PEOPLE DIE. God said to Adam:"Eat your bread with the sweat of your brow until you return to the ground from where you were taken.for you were dust and you will become dust. ” Genesis 3: 17-19 As a result,“all the days of Adam's life were nine hundred and thirty years and he died.”Genesis 5: 5. Adam did not go to heaven or hell.Or live in a spiritual realm. What is the Resurrection? The Bible's answer In the Bible,the Greek word translated "resurrection" means "to stand" or "to restore." The resurrected person is resurrected from the dead and is the same person who was before. 1 Corinthians 15:12, 13. It is true that the word "resurrection" is not found in the Hebrew Scriptures,which are known as the Old Testament, but the promise of resurrection is there.For example,through the prophet Hosea,God promised:“I will rescue them from the hand of the grave, and I will rescue them from death.” Hosea 13:14; Job 14: 13-15; Isaiah 26:19; Daniel 12: 2, 13. Where will people be resurrected? Some people will be resurrected to live in heaven.There they will reign with Jesus Christ. 2 Corinthians 5: 1; Revelation 5: 9, 10.The Bible calls this resurrection "the first resurrection" and the word "first" makes it clear that there will be another resurrection. Revelation 20: 6 That other resurrection will be for the living on paradise earth, and most of the dead will be resurrected in this way. Psalm 37:29. How are the dead raised?God gave Jesus the power to resurrect the dead. John 11:25. Jesus will bring to life “all those in the memorial tombs,” each with his own personality, attributes, and memories. John 5:28, 29. Some will be resurrected to live in heaven, while others will be resurrected to live on paradise earth with perfect and healthy bodies. Isaiah 33:24; 35: 5, 6. 1 Corinthians 15: 42-44, 50 They multiply priests and saints with sad faces pile up, perform miracles,cast out demons.But Jesus said,The tree is known by its fruit. MATTHEW 7: 21-23: 21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven;but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.22 Many will say to me in that day,'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name,and cast out demons in your name,and did many miracles in your name?'23 Then i will tell them plainly that I did not know you at all.Get away from me, you workers of iniquity. Matthew 7: 15-20 15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16 By their fruits ye shall know them.Do they gather grapes from thorns or figs from thistles?17 So every good tree bringeth forth good fruit;and an evil tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.20 Ye shall know them by their fruits. B.LETTER TO CORINTHIANS 11: 13-15: 13 For such are the apostles, liars, deceitful workers, impersonating the apostles of Christ.14 And it is not surprising. because Satan also takes the form of a bright angel.15 Wherefore, it is not a great thing that his ministers should be likened unto the ministers of righteousness. Their end will be in proportion to their deeds. 4: 4. In whom is the god of this world? (Satan) blinded the minds of the unbelievers, that the light of the glory of the gospel of Christ might not shine upon them, which is the image of God. Eternal life is a free gift from God. The eternal punishment is not righteousness because how many years can a human beeing live at most?God is Love Bible answers Ecclesiastes 3:19,20 19 for there is an outcome for humans and an outcome for animals,they all have the same outcome. As the one dies, so the other dies, and they all have but one life. So man has no superiority over animals,(No additional soul. Only have additional knowlege,thinking,talking,etc...)verything is futile. 20 All are going to the same place. They all come from the dust, and they all are returning to the dust. John 5:28,29 28 Do not be amazed at this, for the hour is coming in which all those in the memorial tombs will hear his voice 29 and come out, those who did good things to a resurrection of life, and those who practiced vile things to a resurrection of judgment. Psalm 37:29 it's clear A. LETTER TO TIMOTHY 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men,the man Christ Jesus! Mattew 24:36 36 “Concerning that day and hour nobody knows,neither the angels of the heavens nor the Son, but only the Father. *NO TRINITY* *John* *20:17* 17 *Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.* *JOHN* *6:38* *(Jesus said)* 38 *For I came down from heaven, not to do mine OWN will, but the will of HIM that sent me.* *John* *14:28* 28 *Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.* *Matthew* *20:23* 23 *And HE saith unto them, Ye shall drink indeed of MY cup, and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with: but to sit on my right hand, and on my left, is not MINE to give, but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of my FATHER.* *John* *5:30* 30 *I can of MINE own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not MINE own will, but the will of the FATHER which hath sent ME:* *John* *17:20**-23* *(ONE IN GLORY)* 20 *Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on ME through their word; 21 That they all may be ONE; as THOU, FATHER, art in ME, and I in THEE, that they also may be ONE in US: that the world may believe that THOU hast sent ME. 22 And the glory which thou gavest ME, I have given them; that they may be ONE, even as we are ONE: 23 I in THEM, and THOU in ME, that they may be made perfect in ONE; and that the world may know that thou hast sent ME, and hast loved THEM. as THOU hast loved ME.* TRINITY ARE FALSE* TEACHINGS only thrue Lord God is *JEHOVAH* (the Father*)and his first creation is *JESUS CHRIST*(the Son*) everything else created by *JESUS CHRIST* more Scriptures *NO TRINITY*
Hi.u suggest the is no trinitarian actuality. we have got God the Father and Jesus Christ/Christ Jesus.on top of that ,we have God is Spirit 👈 given by John the Apostle. That is God is Holy Spirit/Ghost👈 it's classed as God. and Paul says at 1 TIMOTHY 3:16 ,that Jesus was/is vindicated/justified in Spirit. in is as, as,so Jesus is God due to his rank with Spirit. Paul has mentioned that "as indeed the are many "gods" and many "lords" " . so, ok, Jesus has got god rank and Lord. wat u gonna do about it?🤦😅
@@aaabrams1889 . The Revelation to John (The Apocalypse) ,22:19 and if any one takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book. (This book refers to NT OT and to take away from the words is when a verse is taken and accused of being a lie/distributing falsehood).
@@aaabrams1889 . REVELATION 22:16 "I Jesus have sent my angel to you with this testimony for the churches. I am the root and the off-spring of David, the bright morning star." off-spring of David = Yeshua bin David a.k.a Joseph. Yeshua bin Joseph 👈 is Jesus Christ/Christ Jesus/Yeshua Ha'masiach. Nb.islamic uphold the claim that with Mary no man touched her,hence no bloodline to Joseph from Jesu. (islamic above claim may be untrue) eg.a verse says ,while baby Jesus is in a cradle,speaks and say literally ,that he has been given the kitab👈 and I don't think a baby is gonna have a book,and i don't think Jesus needed a book or writings.did u ever think god would need a.k.a Christ Jesus would need anything! as Son of Man,yes his food and bodily functionings,give us this day our daily bread(others sources have said our morrow bread). 😅💨
Alonzo,... if you put as much energy into learning and asking the right questions as you do in being a dull, unimaginative TROLL, you might just understand some truths you never ever did.
@@alonzoharris6730 have you even bothered to ask The God of Abraham? Knock on his door, ask for The Truth, and He will open the door and give you want you asked for. Salam to you
Zachary the judgement of the Beit Din is what matters, are you the one to judge whether the Lubavitcher messianists are Jewish or not? Also he doesn't follow the deceiver Yeshu ha notzri of the Talmud contemporary with Simeon Ben Shetach (60AD) and the son of Magdala, this is a common mixup everyone makes.
I am not religious but I find these debates fascinating. Keep it up guys and girls.
These debates are investigative science that eventually will help Civilization to Destroy & Neutralize FOREVER the Roots of the Armies of Jihad that are camouflaged as "religion" to muck at NAIVE Judges & Politicians..
Movies are properly rated for its Level of Violence, but JIHAD is more protected than Winnie the Poo or Dr Zeus... 🧐
it's not a debate
From the foregoing, it is becoming crystal clear that the Umayyad of the 7th century were Christians but not Moslems as SIN would have us believe. It follows, therefore, that if there we're no Moslems in the 7th century', there could have been no Quran in that century.
Careful, Daniel, there was almost certainly a Quran at the time of the Umayyads- however, it would not resemble the Quran of today. Today’s Quran has been designed and re-interpreted to legitimize the Abbasid rule and reign.
@Kilian Klaiber As the Quran makes little sense on its own without the Hadith and Sunnah, you’d have to imagine they were interpolations to create a holy book, a prophet and a religion that otherwise didn’t exist as described in the later Muslim literature and narrative.
It appears that the Ummayads were apostate; non Trinitarian Christians.
@@jameswbuchananjr The Umayyads were a part of the 7th century Christology debate. The Quran is likely a series of poetic attempts to draw Arabic Christians or Arabs in general into the Umayyad Christian sect. Perhaps, as Joe has stated on his site, the Quran is with us today as the Syriac Lectionary. The Quran, as we know it, is a poetic “promotion” to embrace the Lectionary and the Umayyad brand of Christianity. Interested in what folks might think?
There was the Marwanid Qur'an which was based on an earlier collection of Judeo-Arabic Liturgical Dramas written by Judeo-Hagarenes who had adopted a Monophysite belief in Jesus. The authors were devout Trinitarians but they opposed adoptionism.
It is Jesus from the beginning to the end. Fascinating that these guys got it right!!! Thanks Joe. You’re a genius!!! ✝️
I am happy that Jews are chipping in to this debate about how Islam started. They should have joined in a long time ago. Their help in unpacking the Islamic ideology is sorely needed.
The 10 Best Things of Islam:
*10* . The certainty that God loves you.
*9* . Clear moral guidance and rules that exalt the best of our human nature, as we are made in the image of God, such as
- do not kill,
- do not steal,
- do not lie,
- do not commit adultery,
- do not covet your neighbor's wife or possessions,
and
- forgive those who wrong you.
*8* . A sanctified institution of marriage;
which is the indissoluble union of a man and a woman;
in which husband and wife become one flesh,
are equal, and are both commanded to love, honor and respect one another.
*7* .The promise of eternal life in loving union with God.
*6* . A command from God to love your fellow human beings -- i.e. to want them good -- and to live in peace and harmony with them all, irrespective of their sexual orientation, faith, race, gender...
*5* . A command from God to even love your enemies, i.e. to want them good!
*4* . The certainty that God loves every human being as a father loves His children, irrespective of their faith, sexual orientation, gender, race...
*3* . A command from God for you not to judge others or punish them, but to forgive them; because if anybody deserved punisment, God will punish them, not you.
*2* . Beautiful and rich religious rituals which are celebrations of life, are meant to glorify and give thanks to a loving God, and are thus full of joy and are often accompanied with marvellous chants and wonderful music.
*1* . A role model Who you can follow with your eyes closed, because He was pure and committed no sin; so in following Him you can make no error.
Well, to be precise: these would be the ten best things of Islam if they were actually things of Islam, but they are not. Not at all.
None of them is a thing of Islam.
But they are all things of Christianity.
These are some of the good things of Christianity.
Accept Jesus as your Lord and Saviour.
In Jesus you will find truth, love, beauty and eternal life.
nice one 🙏
All praise be to Him...Halleluia Amen.
HELLO!!!!
ISLAM means a person WHO SUBMITS TO HIS CREATOR
and all the prophets of God SUBMITTED TO THEIR CREATOR without partners, persons (pagan trinity) and intercessors, making them ALL MUSLIM by definition.
Mohammad (saw) COMPLETED the religion that started with creation andall the Prophets of God. Here is a Jewish Prof, not to be biased.
ua-cam.com/video/tw2UbF01BSw/v-deo.html
ua-cam.com/video/GJLtu9qpuC4/v-deo.html
Allah loving humanity is not part of Islam. You are an apostate.
@@fantasia55
Where do you come on this - from the Evil missionaries...???
Jesus called the Creator Allah - Alaha in did Aramaic language.
GET YOURSEF EDUCATED
as you are making a fool of yourself.
This is Brilliant..Brother Joe. So many questions to answer by abbasaid perspective.
The Abbasid Narrative is a monumental act of Government "spin-doctoring", sleight of hand and misdirection. The Sassanians used a text designed to attack them in order to strengthen their position while also diminishing its importance. Extremely Machiavellian and alarm g to see how easily the population can be manipulated as long as it happens slowly over a long period of time.
It's eye opening. This is the best explanation of the DOTR inscriptions so far and explain why the quran attacked the Nazarenes all the time.
Yes, this is something that only I have noticed probably because I only wrestle with the Arabic and ignore translations.
I’m a native Arabic speaker. This is awesome. Excellent work.
Is RJ's assessment making sense to you?
Thank you for the support Abanoub. God bless you. I invite you to write to me.
@@אתשלום Yes, it does. Absolutely!
@@abanoubmikhail9632 Would you like to come on my show? Please send me an email.
Revolutionary! Groundbreaking ! Can’t wait for more ❤️
There is so much more still yet to be recorded. Such as the earliest use of the Arabic word Muhammad which was only in Jewish context 100 years before the new Arab calendar began.
Great video thank you all for this great presentation...
Thank you for enjoying it!
The Dome of the Rock inscriptions make much more sense now, Thanks Joe and Jay and Al Fadi...
CHRISTOS ANESTI!
@@Bei-Abedan Hi Red, Yes Christ is Risen, Yeshu Jeevit hua.
@@Bei-Abedan we hope that you could summarize you theory in a book or a video series...Thanks.
By the sound of it, Islam was initially "Christianity" that got "hijacked" to a different alleyway at the later date to what it is now !!
Yes, all the evidence is pointing to this truth. Muhammad morphed from being a title of the Christ, to an entirely different person in an entirely different [tweaked] faith.
Christianity believes in the trinity. It was never Chrustian.
Jews don't accept Jesus. It's also not Judaism. It's islam. It's as simple as that.
Even the dome of the rock inscription says the deen is Islam.
@@alonzoharris6730 Nice assertion.
Correct, the authors were devout trinitarians who believe in Jesus as his son and the ruler of God's creation. But they opposed adoptionism.
@@alonzoharris6730
How can it be Islam when Abdel Malik was depicted in a coin wearing a Christian Cross on his head?. Same thing with another supposedly Islamic caliph Muawiyah who was also shown with a Christian Cross in another coin. Islam was invented by Arab Christians that didn't identify with certain practices of Judaism and Christianity.
As my young daughter recently wrote on my driveway with chalk..."God is Everything".
careful of pantheism!
The little girl wrote a TRUTH:
GOD IS EVERYTHING!
While Pantheism denies GOD to welcome Universal Forces.
But King David said:
-"GOD IS MY SHEPHERD, I WOULD NOT BE NEEDY."
Because GOD is everything and HE Stablished & Controls Universal Forces to inspire Scientists, Artists and SMART children.
God is everything in a sense, that is His wisdom and power is dsiplayed in all things natural - that is created, as Romans 1 states.
Excellent work you guys , I mean JS, Joe and AlFadi
at this critical time such wonderful points need to reach millions in the middleast and else where
Thak God
Yes, well Al-Fadi has promised me that he will be trying to do just that. But he has been threatened by some people for supporting me.
Christian Prince has mentioned multiple times that, from a simple Arabic reading of the the Quran, the text never really attacked the a traditional understanding of the Trinity.
He say that the Quran refers to tri-theism.
Very interesting work.
That was epic guys, I think Joe hit the nail on this one, going back to the 7th century the temple mount ( the Rock ) was all about the Jews mainly I doubt Christians would look at the site as been in God presents as its not idols or temples we worship we can pray to God anywhere any direction at any time, Jews however go to these places which is why I recon Joe hits the nail as it confronts them. We know Islam copies the Jewish traditions hence they both share the resting place of Abraham. So thanks Joe You are spot on and seeing from the eyes of a Jew it makes perfect sense.
I'm not taking away what Thomas and Mel and others view see it we all need to see the alternatives between both Christian and Jews respective this is directed to the Jews in the area as Christians would not even visit this place as it has no bearing on our belief... Could be wrong but Joe makes a good point...
yes the temple mount has been destroyed as God intends to in the new testament. So we Christians should not push to any rebuild of the jewish temple. As we already have our own bloodless sacrifice.
There is no historical evidence for the temple of Solomon in Jerusalem. Not a single rock is found.
Joe should start with the Christian and Jewish Standard narratives first.😊
There were no camels in the Levant in the time of Abraham or Moses.
Camels were only found in What is now Saudi Arabia, Yemen and Eastern Arabia.
The bible claims that there were camels in Arabia. Abraham was in Arabia and not in the Levant.
The Chaldean didn't exist in the time of Moses either. They translated Kasdim as Chaldeans.
The Chaldeans only came after 900 bce. Moses lived in 1400 bce. Abraham lived in 2000 bce.
There is a lot of deception going on with translations into Greek and English.
The Hebrews are from Yemen and not from the Levant.
The deception started with the translation of the Canaanite text into Greek with the Septaguint in Alexandria. They started to make Egypt and the Levant the centre of the OT stories with made up translations.
River became Nile.🤔
It's also assumed that UrShalim (Jerusalem) is always the same city in the OT. That's totally false.
It simply means the city of peace.
The earliest historical record of Jerusalem is from an Arab king called Abdi Heba in the Amarna letters.
There is zero archaeological evidence for the temple of Solomon.
It's even funnier that nobody ever documented a temple there. Alexander the Great never heard of it. The later stories of Josephus are all legends. The clown wrote that the pagan Roman Flavius leaders healed people.
The Greeks passed through that strategic area and made Egypt the centre of their kingdom. No mention of a temple or Jerusalem. Nothing is found.
The biblical Jesus says in Matthew 24 that no stone will be left.
Josephus the Roman propagandist wrote that the temple was completely destroyed.
Eusebius wrote that the temple was completely destroyed.
There is no evidence found of one single piece of a Roman fortress where the Romans stayed in Jerusalem? Do you know why? Because the temple mount was the Roman fortress.😁
It has exactly the same shape as other Roman fortresses. It has the same dimensions. One example is not far away. The Roman fortress of Masada has the same dimensions.
Something fishy is going on.
Thank you Jay. You inspired me to a do a deep dive into the bible.👍🏼
I'm a scuba diver.🏊♂️
Where in Jerusalem was the 10th Roman legion? The Standard Christian Narrative is that it's a tiny small building outside the temple mount. The 10th Roman legion was at least 6000 men soldiers. We should count at least 3000 more which makes it almost 10000.
10000 people in a tiny building is impossible. It's a joke to believe that the Romans would give the Jews an entire strategic mount and they take in a small building outside the wall lol.
The Romans are not stupid. The Wall is a Roman wall. It's the most strategic location in the city for soldiers. That's what the Romans did in every location. They build fortresses witj wall on strategic locations.
Can you do a deep dive into this Joe?😊
@@alonzoharris6730 ,As the site for a future temple, David chose Mount Moriah, or the Temple Mount, where it was believed Abraham had built the altar on which to sacrifice his son Isaac. The First Temple was constructed during the reign of David's son, Solomon, and completed in 957 BC.
It was apparently Abd al-Malik himself who began the work of replacing the nearby wooden structure built by Umar with the magnificent silver-domed stone mosque Al Aqsa. Its construction was to be completed by his son, Caliph Al-Walid I, in the beginning of the 8th century.
The area was claimed by the waqf as a space that served in earlier Islamic periods as a place of prayer, but some saw the move as a part of a "political agenda" and a "pretext" for the Islamization of the underground space, and believed it had been instigated to prevent the site being used a synagogue for Jewish
Just what was it that the Knights Templar found beneath the ruins of Solomon’s Temple? Was it a vast amount of buried treasure? Was it the location of the Ark of the Covenant? Or was it, as some firmly believe to this day, the Holy Grail?
Believed to be constructed around the mid-10th Century BCE on an elevated area of ground in Jerusalem that would later come to be known as Temple Mount, Solomon’s Temple was said to be Phoenician in design. A magnificent, white marble and gold-covered building, the temple contained three chambers consisting of an outer vestibule, the main chamber and the ‘Holy of Holies’. The Holy of Holies was a small antechamber at the back of the temple where the Ark of the Covenant was traditionally thought to be kept. The Ark, as any Indiana Jones aficionado will tell you, contained two stone tablets on which were written the Ten Commandments. The jury’s still out on whether it also contained face-melting avenging angels.
At the entrance to the temple stood two twenty-seven-foot-high brass pillars adorned with ornately decorated capitals. The pillars were known as Boaz and Jachin, and they stood either side of the door that led to the temple’s vestibule. Replicas of Boaz and Jachin - which in Hebrew mean ‘In Him is strength’ and ‘He will establish’ respectively - can be found in most Masonic lodges. Hiram Abiff, the chief architect of the temple, is an important figure in Freemasonry, and the order’s lodges are referred to as ‘temples’ in honor of Abiff’s greatest creation.
The Temple of Solomon was not just a place of worship, but also one of ritual animal sacrifice and bizarre practices such as ‘sacred prostitution’, where pilgrims could pay to use the services of temple prostitutes who would ‘cleanse’ them of their sins by partaking in religiously sanctioned sexual intercourse. Sacred prostitution has been called into doubt by some historians who dispute the practice ever took place.
The temple met its end in 587 BCE when the armies of King Nebuchadnezzar II besieged the city of Jerusalem. The city was razed to the ground and the temple, which had stood for nearly five hundred years, was completely destroyed. The Ark of the Covenant has never seen again, had it ever existed in the first place.
A second, much more modest temple arose from the ashes of the first in 516 BCE. This temple would be vastly altered and turned into a huge and magnificent temple complex by Herod the Great, the king who is perhaps best known from his appearance in the Bible wherein he orders the so-called ‘Massacre of the Innocents’ at the time of the birth of Jesus Christ. Herod’s temple would eventually be destroyed by the Roman Empire in 70 BCE in retaliation for the Jewish Revolt that saw most of Jerusalem - the second temple included - reduced to rubble.
Following the end of Roman rule, the Temple Mount and the ruins of the second temple were used as a huge rubbish dump for the next six hundred years. It wasn’t until the city was in Muslim hands under Caliph Abd al-Malik that the site was cleared in order that a mosque could be built in 691 CE. The mosque, known as the Dome of the Rock, would eventually be joined by the nearby Al-Aqsa mosque, completed in 705 CE. The Dome of the Rock famously stands over the Foundation Stone - a huge slab of rough bedrock on which the Jews believe Abraham attempted to sacrifice his son Isaac. It was over this stone that the Muslims built their mosque. Today, the Dome of the Rock is the third holiest shrine in Islam after Mecca and Medina.
So you can see here how the Knight Temple's robbed temples they were later punished once captured those who survived started up a new group Knights of Christ, then the Freemasons all spin offs from Islam they even use the crescent moon as a symbol, not sure on Freemasons but if you watch the curse of Oak Island they believe the knight Temple's buried treasure there on the Island before been captured, the evidence points back to them, also Freemasons have had a role in it as one of them brought the Island many years ago.
We Christians don't care much about sites of history that was then we now have Jesus but don't get me wrong this was history and played a part of history, good to know how we revolved to bad Islam is stuck in the 7th century bubble..
Its interesting hearing other points, like the cave below the Dome which Solomon built to store treasure and how people add things like well of the souls, I believe this is where Umar your Muhammad was getting Revelations from for his prototype quran you know the one they kicked around after stabbing Umar your prophet, he was the one after dying ascended into heaven not this crazy story from mecca, Mount Moriah is one of the mountain well rocks they built in mecca to copy the Jewish stories, a blind man can see how Islam revolved, peace out.
@@alonzoharris6730 Oh and the well zamzam was also on Mount Moriah as it was used to clean the blood sacrifices down..
Thank you for the support Bob. Nb Zamzam is a different story about a place called Beer Lahai Roi.
Thank you for discussing clearly. everything has been answered the real meaning
Interesting perspective. All new to me. I like it, it makes sense.
The part on "say not three" was fabulous! I've thought of that before, wondering if this is what was meant, but it's wonderful to hear it. We are in a great time.
"say not three" YES - rather say what Jesus said: OUR lord is ONE GOD....including himself.
@@aaabrams1889 here we go again lol the troll is on hhh the SIN is a sin hhhh
@@aaabrams1889 exactly, including himself, they are all 1 God...
@@ssv7195
YES - they are all 1 God each.
Yes, the One God referred to includes Jesus himself who is also in turn a tripartite being.
mahmad in this case is an adjective about the archangel - something that had been said for a 1000 years in a similar order (or predicate verb?)
and the jews of the time would have been confused since it is a usage of words in such a way that had a close and personal meaning that already existed in their language and culture
i also want to point out that daal, raa, 'Haa, are different and can all be confused for each other between this character style and the next. the closed haa is surprisingly exactly as it is today and looked altered for some reason. a script written in straight strokes suddenly has a perfect circular curve...? hmmm.
Yes MHMD refers to the Archangel (the Lesser HaShem) as we will see from Judeo-Arabic inscriptions from the Jewish Kingdom of Himyar.
🙏😇
Awesome , praise the lord 💞🙏
I'm sorry, I'm sorry! Jay, Joe, Brother Al Fadi: I'm only 51 seconds into this video and SUDDENLY, a memory floats up from the Challenger Deep of my brain:
_ it was my third class with an ancient, half blind, Jesuit, exegesis professor, who loved cognac, blue cheese and dark chocolate;
_we hear the tap, tap, tap of his cane as he walks from the stairwell door, down the hall and into the classroom;
_he tap, tap, taps his way over to the lectern, takes off one pair of very dark glasses, puts on another, very thick pair of clear glasses, peers his face down to the page, the tip of his nose is almost touching the papers on the lectern, he straightens up, softly clears his throat, and says:
"A Jew, a Christian and a Muslim, half way through Ramadan, a couple of days after Easter and Passover, and after sundown, walk into a bar...", his voice trailed off as soon as we all burst out laughing. He waits till we've all quieted down and are once again composed, and then he said:
"If you stay for the second half of my lecture,
at the end, I'll tell you the rest of the joke."
I want to thank you, on a day when the news from Europe is grim, for making me smile, remembering the antics of an old professor, who died long ago.
LOL
It's fascinating how the understanding of Islam's origins is evolving with each new video.
Each video is a different theory - CONTRADICTING what was said previously...ha ha ha
@@aaabrams1889 I see it more as slowly peeling away the outer layers getting ever closer to the core truth of the matter.
@@chrishoff402
In your imagination - YES...as EVERY clown on Jay's show (yes, it's a show for idiots) comes up with a DIFFERENT theory...
@@aaabrams1889 says a abdul who literally follows an idiot.
AA Abrams is partially correct. This Judaic approach is my own which I have been working on since 1996 and has been worked on my Judaix experts for hundreds of years. It has nothing to do with what others have been saying although many of the ideas that others use are harvested from the Judaix perspective.
Extraordinary stuff, make more sense. We should always interpret things with the context of 7th century...
Archeological excavations at Al haqsa mosques can reveal historical facts and information about the underground structure.
Not in our lifetime. Whenever archeologists dig anywhere in the vicinity of the Temple Mount, the entire Muslim world starts screaming (falsely) that Israel is trying to undermine the mosque. Of course, no excavation in the mount itself is possible.
Yes the Islamusts themselves have been scraping off all the archaeology they can from the surface and taking truckloads of valuable archaeological evidence off to dumpsites.
@@Bei-Abedan Say, would you be interested in being a guest on an Israeli channel?
@@zarathustrasserpent1850
כן בוודאי!
at 25:00 "Oh ye 'People of the Book'" May be specifically referring to Karaite-Sadduccees (literalists without Oral Law) rather than Jews more broadly
Red Judaism could make his case so much better if he produced more PowerPoint slides to go with his presentation. He makes excellent discoveries and offers amazing insights
this is again a great video..but I think we meanwhile need a more complete paper with sources and cross references etc. again , great work.
Thank you! The more of my videos you watch, the more familiar with the sources you will become.
It looks like everything is Islam is open to the magic of reinterpretation.
As is always the case with man-made religion.
Rule Number One: My Definition is correct.
Rule Number Two: If your definition conflicts with my definition, refer to Rule One.
Jay u need to ask Joe to get a bigger curser coz when he's talking & saying over here & over there it's so so hard to see this tiny little arrow, I ended up having to cast the vid to my 55" Television Just to see what he's pointing out & not everyone will have this option
so from my understanding including previous videos joe is saying that quran never attacks trinity but only attacks theophany, trimurti, and adoptionism. am i right?
The Quran does not attack trinity nor theophany. In fact the Quran heavily promotes Jesus as the unity of the three Theophanies. But you are correct it attacks trimurty and adoptionism, yes.
@@Bei-Abedan
STOP YOUR LIES
The Quran is clear who Jesus is "the son of Mary and that he was a messenger of God" and God is NOT A 3RD.
[Surah An-Nisa; 4:171]
@@aaabrams1889 Inna yakun lahu walid
The council anathema Arian's adoptionism (Arius), not Nestorianism (Nestorius).
The council of Chalcedon attacked Nestorianism as an example of Adoptionsm.
Hi Joe. Great work. You mentioned the word Muhammad on the inscription on dome of the rock refers to Temple Mount, How would you explain the coins with inscription of Muhammad on them?
Shalom, I'm sorry there is a misunderstanding. I was trying to say that many Jews would have been familiar with Ezekiel 24 where the word MHMD is used to refer to the Presence of the Lord in the Holy of Holies (where the Dome now is) but that the inscription is saying that only Jesus is the Temple. So the coins are depicting Jesus.
@@Bei-Abedan shalom and thank you, it makes more sense.
@@joecarbone2316 And notice how the usual Dawah trolls are dumb-smacked and can not respond to this. It is the end of islamism.
@@Bei-Abedan honestly your findings and research on pre Islam should be published in a scholarly book. The missing link is how the Abbasid Islam was created, who were the creators, what motivated them, who is Muhammad, how he became a figure of prophecy, why Mecca became the fabricated center of the story?
The truth must outshine all deadly fears Islam casts on its followers for doubting and leaving Islam.
@@joecarbone2316 I can't afford to self-publish and there aren't many publishers who would take the risk on publishing such a book right now. But if you come across one please do let me know. In the meantime, you might enjoy subscribing to my channel where many of the topics you mentioned are frequently discussed.
Please help me here: Are you telling us that the “Dome of the Rock” located in Jerusalem was built by Christians (Heretical Christians - the Umayyads) to confront (challenge) Jewish Scriptures? If so, it is starting to make sense as to why Muslims chose another place (Mecca) for their holy site - a location that cannot support the Quran both geographically and archeologically.
I think Joe only refers to the AlAqsa
STOP WITH YOUR IDIOCY...HA HA HA
Believing the Evil missionaries about Islam...
The Umayyads weren't Heretical xtians... The Umayyads were the first Muslim dynasty, established in 661 in Damascus. Their dynasty succeeded the leadership of the first four caliphs-Abū Bakr, ʿUmar I, ʿUthmān, and ʿAlī. first great Muslim dynasty to rule the empire of the caliphate (661-750 CE).
The Umayyads, headed by Abū Sufyān, were a largely merchant family of the Quraysh tribe centred at Mecca.
IF these lies were true what those Evil missionaries say, ' tthe Umayyads were Heretical xtians' - they would have discarded Mecca and Medina and made Jerusalem the centre of Islam.
Yes Christ Above All. I am only referring to the Dome and not to Al Aqsa. But why should we call them heretical since they believed in Jesus and in the trinity?
Catholic Church never considers her Ortodox brothers as heretical. The schism was more political than dogmatic.
Thomas Alexander interpretation of the DOTR was from anti-trinitarian pov, maybe due to anti-trinitarian nature of the quran, so he assumed that the muawiyah must have been anti-trinitarian.
I think Joe had a clearer interpretation of the DOTR inscriptions from the linguistic pov that perfectly matched oriental Orthodox pov, against the Judeo-nazarene heresy.
The Church of the Holy Sepulchre was (Roman) Catholic and DOTR temple was rebuilt by Orthodox. I would guess the al aqsa next door was actually an Orthodox Church.
@@AndiWidjaja The whole point of my series is to show that the Umayyad texts are trinitarian Monophysite far from anti-trinitarian. Not Eastern Orthodox but Oriental Orthodox against the Judeo-Nazarene Adoptionism (Nestorianism).
Brother Joe is 💯. Btw why isn't the Armenian quarter stated on the map 7:00
Outstanding
*Amazing! Thank you Al Fadi, Jay and Joe!*
*Thank you for your time and dedication to finding out the truth!*
Hmm ... Abd al-Malik ibn Marwan building the Dome of the Rock on the site of the Holy of Holies thereby casting
shade on Judaism. And at the same time building the Dome at the place of one of the highest elevations in the
city of Jerusalem; therefore towering over the Church of the Holy Sepulchre (aka: Church of the Resurrection)
as well as the rest of the city.
Although the Temple Mount and the Church of the Holy Sepulchre are some distance from each other. The
CoHS was controlled by the Eastern Orthodox Church; the state church of the Eastern Roman/Byzantine empire;
that practiced Nicene (Trinitarian) Christianity (the only legal form of Christianity in the Roman/Byzantine empire.
*Hadrian did something similar when he defeated the Jews during the Bar Kokhba revolt* (aka: Third Jewish-
Roman War ...132--136 CE) Hadrian had visited Jerusalem in either 129 or 130 CE and stated that he was
going to rebuild the city. His visit and the ensuing taxation to rebuild the city were two of the several factors in
the Bar Kokhba revolt
After the Bar Kokhba revolt the rebuilding of the city of Jerusalem continued and Hadrian renamed the city:
"Aelia Capitolina." The Jewish Temple was not rebuilt (It had been destroyed in 70 CE during the First Jewish-
Roman war, ... 66--74 CE)
Hadrian ordered a temple and statue of Zeus (Jupiter) to be placed on the site of the Jewish temple
He also ordered a temple to Venus (Aphrodite) to be built over the site of Christ's tomb (to insult the very
small Christian population, whom Hadrian considered to be a dangerous offshoot of Judaism). In addition,
since the youths of Samaria had joined in the Bar Kokhba revolt; a statue of Zeus was placed on Mount Gerizim.
(i.e. the Samaritan's holy place)
What is the script on the DOTR, Aramaic? Why Aramaic, why now Hebrew? If it is targeted to jJews, to convert them to christianity,
This would've been a better presentation if we had Joe's commentary with Arabic and English text.
Which part would you like to see in Arabic?
@@Bei-Abedan what you were verbally translating, English alongside the Arabic text.
This would've made it easier to follow along with your commentary.
Hope that makes my point clearer :)
@@Stardust475 So just to be clear, you would like to see English words underneath the Arabic words?
@@Bei-Abedan
Yes :)
@@Stardust475 OK I've got you. Sadly it is too late for the next episode which has already been recorded but I will think about that for the future.
Speak slowly n clearly Joe...Tqvm
Dont get me wrong....i just want to grasp what was said....hope Dr Jay will unpack the issue in simple lang....please.
“Yeshua answered and said to them: “Tear down this temple, and in three days I will raise it up.”” John 2:19 (Aramaic Bible in Plain English)
MHMD is the temple of the body of Christ. Hence the temolars were dedicated to MHMD (not to any Arabian prophet which they were falsely accused of by their rivals).
So the Dome of the Rock was the forbidden meating place - the Haram Mosque - in Jerusalem nowhere near modern day Mecca.
So, mahmed was originally a Jewish word just like the other Arabic words like Rasulala, the Rahim and the Rahman. Waoooo.
That's a compelling case. I will be adding to that later by bringing in AJ Deus' interpretation that it is against the theology of a specific Jewish figure purporting to be the Messiah in the 16th century. For context, we need to establish when exactly the inscriptions were created. See upcoming series on this channel.
What do you think of the theory that the original pre Islamic devotion for the rock under the dome of the rock was Christian? I read that the anonymous Piacenza pilgrim (570’s) went to a church there above Mount Zion where the rock on which Christ stood during his judgment by Pilate is revered. He even described the footprints Christ left in the rock as being slender and graceful. I looked into it and found that there was a Byzantine church around that rock named Hagia Sophia which the Persians had destroyed in their invasion of 614. Could it be that Abdul Malik has the ambulatory inscribed with anti Christian or at least anti Chacedonian Christian engravings because pilgrims there would have associated that location with Christ? I find it interesting that there are traditions till today that there are Mohammed’s footprints in the rock as well.
The Mahmad is a Hebrew word for "the beloved" which is a reference to the sacred temple of God (the Temple Mount and the Holiest of Holies), but which Christians understand to be Jesus. Recall that after driving out the money-changers, "The Jews then responded to him, asking “What sign can you show us to prove your authority to do all this?” Jesus answered them, “Destroy this temple, and I will raise it again in three days.” - John 2:18-19
To mister Jay: You are right "politics" is very important in this regard, but in you saying this, you actually strengthen Joe's claim.
If Abdul Malik ruled over the Umayyad kingdom, as a monophysite king, then he understood the same thing that Roman Christian caesars understood, which is that in order for his rule to be politically stable, he absolutely must bring the Jews to accept Jesus and Christianity.
That is exactly what Joe explained.
Abdul Malik used that spot, to try and explain to the Jews the 'Monophysite Trinity' in a way Jews could understand and therefore accept and thus come to Christianity... for the BENEFIT POLITICAL STABILITY for Abdul Malik's rule.
But Abdul Malik could never have forced such a narrative if he did indeed hold to the [future] conception of islam.
@@annemurphy9339
I don't understand.
Why couldn't have he tried to sway his Jewish subjects to accept Jesus and the monophysite Trinity?
More importantly, why wouldn't he?
💐💐💐🙏♥️👍✝️
dear joe
please put all you want to say in a book form in the internet
It is difficult for me to grasp your prnounciation
Wow! Brain stretching. It is amazing what a few dot and squiggles can do to a text.
The theophanys are about Jesus and that's the point.Allat Aluzza and Manat don't feature anywhere in the Torah or do they?
I am not sure quite where to post this but I hope this is OK!... The Elder of Ziyon blogspot has an interesting article (including photos and links) _Why did the Muslims put a menorah on their coins? Could be to symbolize Islamic supremacy._ , in which the author (thinking from the perspective of the current SIN) mentions several interesting points: “….Some Muslim coins used "visual puns" where a different picture would be seen upside down than right side up. Back in 2013, I mentioned that coin collectors had noted (link) that the upside down version of the Muslim menorah resembles the Dome of the Rock, with the two-pronged Islamic crescent on top (photo)….This could account for the changes to the menorah appearance to look more dome-like….A few years after my post, some Israeli researchers came to the same conclusion (link), which was debated in certain circles. But a new proof for the upside down theory came from the discovery of an important inscription (link) that was found in Nuba, near Hebron, in 2016: (photo) ‘A team of archaeologists revealed the existence of a 1000-year-old text, dated to the beginning of the Islamic era, which indicates that the Muslims perceived the Dome of the Rock as a reestablishment of the earlier Jewish Temple. They referred to it as “Bayt al-maqdis” in the inscription, which derives from the biblical Hebrew terminology as ‘Beit Hamikdash’, known as the Hebrew reference to the Holy Temple.’ Turning the coins upside down could easily symbolize replacing the Jewish Temple, represented by the menorah, with the Dome of the Rock where early Muslims performed their own Temple-like rituals - and called it the "Bayt al-Maqdis," a term that later on started referring to all of Jerusalem….”
29:00
The angel of the Lord is the pre-incarnate Christ.
An Ippon seoi nage followed by a juji gatame, and the you can read the text. 😀
Maybe someone will get the joke. Fascinating video all the same.
Rasul = Rashel = Archangel ???
The term “archangel,” which denotes an angel of high rank who commands other angels, doesn’t actually have a Hebrew equivalent in Jewish Scriptures. The book of Daniel, however, mentions two angels by name, Gabriel and Michael, and refers to Michael as a SAR, which means “prince” or “minister.” The term “minister” seems an apt description of what differentiates angels like Michael and Gabriel from the unnamed angels we encounter throughout the Bible, starting from Genesis.
In the Midrash, Michael is called the “prince of kindness (chessed) and water” and Gabriel “the prince of severity (gevurah) and fire.
Rasul means messanger not archangel
Rochel is a name of Kabbalah angel ... doesn't mean archangel
WIKISHIA admits Rasul is a divine messenger so does St John of damascus who calls him GOD
dear joe
why is it that the so many jews in all the 2000 years of histpry have never spoken a word so far ?
please give proofs for all your ground shaking new informations .
Spoke a word on what?
We still dont believe in jesus (Joe does not represent us on this)
You never asked, you christians/muslims conviced yourselves you are our successors and you wanted to teach us what our (not yours) scriptures say, you wanted to force us, you thought we are your pets.
@@Danielst15lm Hey shut the hell up blood idiot we christians popularized your torah and trust me when it comes to the defence of the torah you idiots are nowhere to be found i love jewish people for their preservation of my torah but stupid people like you spoil their name.
Rochel is a name of Kabbalah angel ... doesn't mean archangel
Rochel means the God who sees everything
@@dwy8569 yes and it's not and archangel
@@roukayajannah5111facepalm Rasul being an archangel is the least of your worries
Joe's IQ must be above the roof...he knows a lot of stuff..
Jay ask al fadi what is the meaning of messiah in arabic?
Ask him
Yemani Arabik also part of Quran
All archangels and angels are created spirit beings.
But Jesus in His prefleshly form was NOT created.
When you gonna research on following
Quranic account on previous historical events
Quran’s rhetoric that never changed
Quran (600 plus pages) has memorized by millions of Muslims
Quran has only one version
Prophet Muhammad PBUM name mentioned in Torah and New Testament
Most of the Rabis in prophet Muhammad PBUM times testified the coming of the last prophet in Arabia as it is mentioned in Torah
And the list goes on and on.
Remember I am waiting…
And Allah is all wise and knows better.
Early Qurans did not have vowels. Modern Qurans have vowels.
Qur'an has changed.
Muhammed Abdullah Kadijah Khuwhalid
The Praised One of God 1st Born Rightous Eternal
The eternal Word of God (Kalimatullah) was made flesh by the Ruh Al-Qudus into The Temple (Body of Christ). It was destroyed and rebuilt in three days.
*Matthew* *7: 13,14*
*14 Go in through the narrow gate; for WIDE is the gate, and broad is the way, that leadeth unto DESTRUCTION, and MANY are they which go in thereon.14 For the gate is NARROW, and the strait is the way, which leadeth unto LIFE, and FEW there be that find it.*
*A.* *Timothy* *2: 4,5*
*4 GOD wants all people to be saved and to know the TRUTH. 5 For there is one GOD, and one MEDITATOR between GOD and men, the MAN CHRIST JESUS;*
*Revelation of John* *3:14*
*14 And unto the angel of the church in Laodicea write; Thus saith the AMEN, the FAITHFUL and TRUE WITNESS. the beginning of the CREATION of GOD.*
"ARE MANY" who will follow the path of loss but "A FEW" will find the narrow gate.
Mattew 7:13
John 3:13 (Jesus said)No one ascended into heaven. but he that came down from heaven, even the Son of man which was from the heaven.
Why do we grow old and die?
GOD did not want humans to die. Our first parents, Adam and Eve, were created with a perfect mind and body.They could still be alive today.This is clear from what God said to Adam about a tree growing in the garden of Eden.
God said to Adam:“The day you eat [from the tree] you will surely die.” Genesis 2:17. This command would have been meaningless if Adam had been created to grow old and die. Adam knew that if he did not eat from that tree, he would not die.
GOD'S PURPOSE WAS NOT THAT PEOPLE DIE.
God said to Adam:"Eat your bread with the sweat of your brow until you return to the ground from where you were taken.for you were dust and you will become dust. ”
Genesis 3: 17-19
As a result,“all the days of Adam's life were nine hundred and thirty years and he died.”Genesis 5: 5. Adam did not go to heaven or hell.Or live in a spiritual realm.
What is the Resurrection?
The Bible's answer
In the Bible,the Greek word translated "resurrection" means "to stand" or "to restore." The resurrected person is resurrected from the dead and is the same person who was before. 1 Corinthians 15:12, 13.
It is true that the word "resurrection" is not found in the Hebrew Scriptures,which are known as the Old Testament, but the promise of resurrection is there.For example,through the prophet Hosea,God promised:“I will rescue them from the hand of the grave, and I will rescue them from death.” Hosea 13:14; Job 14: 13-15; Isaiah 26:19; Daniel 12: 2, 13.
Where will people be resurrected? Some people will be resurrected to live in heaven.There they will reign with Jesus Christ.
2 Corinthians 5: 1; Revelation 5: 9, 10.The Bible calls this resurrection "the first resurrection" and the word "first" makes it clear that there will be another resurrection. Revelation 20: 6 That other resurrection will be for the living on paradise earth, and most of the dead will be resurrected in this way.
Psalm 37:29.
How are the dead raised?God gave Jesus the power to resurrect the dead. John 11:25. Jesus will bring to life “all those in the memorial tombs,” each with his own personality, attributes, and memories.
John 5:28, 29.
Some will be resurrected to live in heaven, while others will be resurrected to live on paradise earth with perfect and healthy bodies. Isaiah 33:24; 35: 5, 6. 1 Corinthians 15: 42-44, 50
They multiply priests and saints with sad faces pile up, perform miracles,cast out demons.But Jesus said,The tree is known by its fruit.
MATTHEW
7: 21-23:
21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven;but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven.22 Many will say to me in that day,'Lord, Lord, did we not prophesy in your name,and cast out demons in your name,and did many miracles in your name?'23 Then i will tell them plainly that I did not know you at all.Get away from me, you workers of iniquity.
Matthew 7: 15-20
15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16 By their fruits ye shall know them.Do they gather grapes from thorns or figs from thistles?17 So every good tree bringeth forth good fruit;and an evil tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither can a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit.19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire.20 Ye shall know them by their fruits.
B.LETTER TO CORINTHIANS
11: 13-15:
13 For such are the apostles, liars, deceitful workers, impersonating the apostles of Christ.14 And it is not surprising. because Satan also takes the form of a bright angel.15 Wherefore, it is not a great thing that his ministers should be likened unto the ministers of righteousness. Their end will be in proportion to their deeds.
4: 4. In whom is the god of this world?
(Satan) blinded the minds of the unbelievers, that the light of the glory of the gospel of Christ might not shine upon them, which is the image of God.
Eternal life is a free gift from God. The eternal punishment is not righteousness because how many years can a human beeing live at most?God is Love
Bible answers
Ecclesiastes 3:19,20
19 for there is an outcome for humans and an outcome for animals,they all have the same outcome. As the one dies, so the other dies, and they all have but one life. So man has no superiority over animals,(No additional soul. Only have additional knowlege,thinking,talking,etc...)verything is futile. 20 All are going to the same place. They all come from the dust, and they all are returning to the dust.
John 5:28,29
28 Do not be amazed at this, for the hour is coming in which all those in the memorial tombs will hear his voice 29 and come out, those who did good things to a resurrection of life, and those who practiced vile things to a resurrection of judgment.
Psalm 37:29
it's clear
A. LETTER TO TIMOTHY 2:5 For there is one God, and one mediator between God and men,the man Christ Jesus!
Mattew 24:36
36 “Concerning that day and hour nobody knows,neither the angels of the heavens nor the Son, but only the Father.
*NO TRINITY*
*John* *20:17*
17 *Jesus saith unto her, Touch me not; for I am not yet ascended to my Father: but go to my brethren, and say unto them, I ascend unto my Father, and your Father; and to my God, and your God.*
*JOHN* *6:38*
*(Jesus said)*
38 *For I came down from heaven, not to do mine OWN will, but the will of HIM that sent me.*
*John* *14:28*
28 *Ye have heard how I said unto you, I go away, and come again unto you. If ye loved me, ye would rejoice, because I said, I go unto the Father: for my Father is greater than I.*
*Matthew* *20:23*
23 *And HE saith unto them, Ye shall drink indeed of MY cup, and be baptized with the baptism that I am baptized with: but to sit on my right hand, and on my left, is not MINE to give, but it shall be given to them for whom it is prepared of my FATHER.*
*John* *5:30*
30 *I can of MINE own self do nothing: as I hear, I judge: and my judgment is just; because I seek not MINE own will, but the will of the FATHER which hath sent ME:*
*John* *17:20**-23*
*(ONE IN GLORY)*
20 *Neither pray I for these alone, but for them also which shall believe on ME through their word; 21 That they all may be ONE; as THOU, FATHER, art in ME, and I in THEE, that they also may be ONE in US: that the world may believe that THOU hast sent ME. 22 And the glory which thou gavest ME, I have given them; that they may be ONE, even as we are ONE: 23 I in THEM, and THOU in ME, that they may be made perfect in ONE; and that the world may know that thou hast sent ME, and hast loved THEM. as THOU hast loved ME.*
TRINITY ARE FALSE* TEACHINGS only thrue Lord God is *JEHOVAH* (the Father*)and his first creation is *JESUS CHRIST*(the Son*) everything else created by *JESUS CHRIST*
more Scriptures *NO TRINITY*
Hi.u suggest the is no trinitarian actuality. we have got God the Father and Jesus Christ/Christ Jesus.on top of that ,we have God is Spirit 👈 given by John the Apostle.
That is God is Holy Spirit/Ghost👈 it's classed as God.
and Paul says at 1 TIMOTHY 3:16 ,that Jesus was/is vindicated/justified in Spirit. in is as, as,so Jesus is God due to his rank with Spirit.
Paul has mentioned that "as indeed the are many "gods" and many "lords" " .
so, ok, Jesus has got god rank and Lord.
wat u gonna do about it?🤦😅
@@asifbrettishmaelmakki9
ALL PAGANISM with all those godsss...
@@aaabrams1889 .
I don't think Jesus was a pagan.
Holy Spirit/Ghost i don't think is a pagan.
God the Father i don't think is a pagan.
@@aaabrams1889 .
The Revelation to John
(The Apocalypse)
,22:19 and if any one takes away from the words of the book of this prophecy, God will take away his share in the tree of life and in the holy city, which are described in this book.
(This book refers to NT OT
and to take away from the words is when a verse is taken and accused of being a lie/distributing falsehood).
@@aaabrams1889 . REVELATION 22:16 "I Jesus have sent my angel to you with this testimony for the churches. I am the root and the off-spring of David, the bright morning star."
off-spring of David = Yeshua bin David a.k.a Joseph.
Yeshua bin Joseph 👈 is Jesus Christ/Christ Jesus/Yeshua Ha'masiach.
Nb.islamic uphold the claim that with Mary no man touched her,hence no bloodline to Joseph from Jesu.
(islamic above claim may be untrue)
eg.a verse says ,while baby Jesus is in a cradle,speaks and say literally ,that he has been given the kitab👈 and I don't think a baby is gonna have a book,and i don't think Jesus needed a book or writings.did u ever think god would need a.k.a Christ Jesus would need anything! as Son of Man,yes his food and bodily functionings,give us this day our daily bread(others sources have said our morrow bread).
😅💨
The Quran is so nonsensical and without any context you can interpret passages in many different ways. I need more proof for Joes theory.
Jay Smith believes in three gods.
"Bismillah, Al Rahman, Al Rahim" really means "In the Name of The Father, The Son and The Holy Spirit"
Christ is the Al Rahman
Alonzo,...
if you put as much energy into
learning and asking the right questions as you do
in being a dull,
unimaginative TROLL,
you might just understand
some truths you never ever did.
@@silverltc2729
Allah is ahad and wahid.
No need to try to force your 4th century pagan creed into each and every scripture.
Alonzo harris believes in a pedophile false prophet
@@alonzoharris6730 have you even bothered to ask The God of Abraham? Knock on his door, ask for The Truth, and He will open the door and give you want you asked for.
Salam to you
foolish news for foolish people
No. Joe is not Jewish if he follows Jesus. Pfander, your credibility is lessened by perpetuating that narrative.
@mysotiras 011 ethnicity is irrelevant, calling him a messianist seals the deal...a Christian.
@mysotiras 011
What is an ethnic Jew according to your bible?
Zachary the judgement of the Beit Din is what matters, are you the one to judge whether the Lubavitcher messianists are Jewish or not? Also he doesn't follow the deceiver Yeshu ha notzri of the Talmud contemporary with Simeon Ben Shetach (60AD) and the son of Magdala, this is a common mixup everyone makes.
@@dwy8569 they're certainly on their way out.
@@dwy8569 then he should clarify it for everyone.