Memory and the Philosophy of History

Поділитися
Вставка
  • Опубліковано 13 січ 2025

КОМЕНТАРІ • 11

  • @davidnollmeyer
    @davidnollmeyer 12 років тому +3

    Every event in space-time has a history independent of an observer. Hence in sensate beings as humans memory appears to be a collective condensation and interpretation of what has occurred. Hence history is not dependent on experience but memory is.

  • @Oishi08
    @Oishi08 12 років тому +1

    going to be getting Historico-Philosophical this afternoon!

  • @GS42SCHOPAWE
    @GS42SCHOPAWE 6 років тому +1

    I’ll try and remember this...

  • @GS42SCHOPAWE
    @GS42SCHOPAWE 6 років тому +1

    Interesting

  • @tet-limyee6743
    @tet-limyee6743 8 місяців тому

    Akin to a scientist addresses metaphysical issue.

  • @DinkerTinker1
    @DinkerTinker1 12 років тому +3

    Survival of the fittest means "survival of the most flexible party" (The Origin of Species by Charles Darwin). Charles Darwin´s theory of the "fittest" is seldom portrayed in the right way. Unfortunately.

  • @banq0o
    @banq0o 12 років тому

    respect!

  • @patrickrailroad
    @patrickrailroad 2 роки тому

    FALLACY of selective historical DEFINITIONS
    His explanation of history - the “reductio ad absurdum..fallacy” claimed Jewish Discrimination as the topic in the explanation of history. Not the horror of the Jewish bolsheviks, the entire world war, but a highly contested invective Jewish memory.

  • @patrickrailroad
    @patrickrailroad 2 роки тому

    Acta deos numquam mortalia fallunt."
    “Mortal actions never deceive the gods," this Latin phrase certainly fits the bill. Motzkin “selective memory” of Jews in history, dismissive facts of the history of the horrific Bolsheviks (90 %Jews) , And the gruesome murderer in the invasion of Palestine. Doesn’t fit his memory in his narrative of history.

  • @sudd3660
    @sudd3660 12 років тому +1

    forget history, remember informasjon and knowledge.