Don't forget that this is a clip from the FULL conference talk by David. Watch it at our channels: 👉Rumble: rumble.com/v4nq6mb-a-false-sister-lucia-by-david-rodrguez-fc24-dallas-tx.html 👉SpiritusTV: spiritustv.com/v/UH4KZE
Agreed. Bertone was NOT interviewing the real Sister Lucia and I strongly suspect he was well aware of that, but perhaps not. The real Lucia was long gone at the time of that interview -at least she had been MOVED somewhere else when John XXIII’s refusal was made public. At some point before 1967 Lucia was replaced; however, I believe this woman, probably already a nun, who replaced her had been convinced that she was doing God’s work and serving the Church in taking on the persona-finishing “the mission”-of Lucia. I don’t believe Sister Lucia was killed (definitely not then anyway)-only moved from her convent and probably from the area-because to announce her death at or near the time that the Church had just shocked the Catholic world by refusing to release the long-awaited Third Secret would have been to unleash a storm of not unreasonable suspicion … that the Vatican had something to do with her death.
I believe Sister Lucia was replaced with an imposter before 1960. There is no way the Sister Lucia who was interviewed in the 1980's and later is the REAL Sister Lucia.
The impostor lucy was first paraded by pope John 23 and then by the vatican 2 popes. I agree with you that the real Sister Lucia Dos Santos had been replaced in 1967. This guy is unreliable and unbelievable.
Why is the theory of the fake Sr Lucia widespread but there’s never anything on any theory of JPII being an communist infiltrator who’s true vocation was to help Russia to bury Fatima and help bring about the Perestroika deception? The furthest anyone seems to go with JPII is that he was simply a Modernist and a heretic.
That’s the imposter lucy whom the vatican 2 popes had been presenting to the public. I believe they are all involved in the coverup. Just wondering what they did to the real Sister Lucia dos Santos?
the message can never be discredited because lady of akita confirms it.....but if pope john23 nevver read message when explicitly was told to by not only sister Lucia but actually immaculate heart of virgin mary and disobeyed blessed mother's wish, then how can we not believe that the wheels were in motion just before or just after , that sister Lucia had to GO..
Did the REAL Sister Lucia live past 1960? If she were, say, 10 years old in 1917, she would be 53 in 1960. Then 63 in 1970, then 73 in 1980. Then 83 in 1990, and 93 in 2000. Did the Seer of Fatima, Sister Lucia, live that long? If she died when was that? The Fatima message should not be watered down, but by introducing a fake Sister Lucia it makes most believer suspicious of the Church’s motives. This speaker can try to convince us to not believe our eyes, but c’mon already… 🤨
Why insert the message about joining in the First Saturdays during the speaker's message? Why not just do it up front before the speaker begins? We miss the complete message he's trying to deliver.
That is purely a lie, if you want to convince yourself that they never have a fake sister Lucy go ahead and do that, you are telling me that sister Lucy decided to betrayed our lady and Jesus christ and decided to join the people that were trying to destroy the church, even when she saw hell fire?
Thank you for your comment. Yes, we agree. The subject of the photos from 1967 onward could not have been the true Sister Lucia. The woman was an imposter. Please see Mr. Rodriguez' full discussion of the subject at rumble.com/v4nq6mb-a-false-sister-lucia-by-david-rodrguez-fc24-dallas-tx.html
David, please stop screaming. There's a difference between enthusiasm, passion, and angry screaming. You need to learn how to speak 'on the breathe. Your vocal chords on turning into sandpaper. Your voice distracts from the message. Thank you!
Don't forget that this is a clip from the FULL conference talk by David. Watch it at our channels:
👉Rumble: rumble.com/v4nq6mb-a-false-sister-lucia-by-david-rodrguez-fc24-dallas-tx.html
👉SpiritusTV: spiritustv.com/v/UH4KZE
The Devil is just a creep ... He is no match for Our Lady 😇
There's still the issue of the real identity of Sr Lucia
I agree.
Agreed. Bertone was NOT interviewing the real Sister Lucia and I strongly suspect he was well aware of that, but perhaps not. The real Lucia was long gone at the time of that interview -at least she had been MOVED somewhere else when John XXIII’s refusal was made public. At some point before 1967 Lucia was replaced; however, I believe this woman, probably already a nun, who replaced her had been convinced that she was doing God’s work and serving the Church in taking on the persona-finishing “the mission”-of Lucia. I don’t believe Sister Lucia was killed (definitely not then anyway)-only moved from her convent and probably from the area-because to announce her death at or near the time that the Church had just shocked the Catholic world by refusing to release the long-awaited Third Secret would have been to unleash a storm of not unreasonable suspicion … that the Vatican had something to do with her death.
Sister Lucia wanted to be compliant to Mary's wishes, not Satan's.
I believe Sister Lucia was replaced with an imposter before 1960.
There is no way the Sister Lucia who was interviewed in the 1980's and later is the REAL Sister Lucia.
The impostor lucy was first paraded by pope John 23 and then by the vatican 2 popes. I agree with you that the real Sister Lucia Dos Santos had been replaced in 1967. This guy is unreliable and unbelievable.
I agree. Why was the imposter paraded around as if she were the seer of Fatima? Why would the Vatican do that? Something fishy about that!
Why is the theory of the fake Sr Lucia widespread but there’s never anything on any theory of JPII being an communist infiltrator who’s true vocation was to help Russia to bury Fatima and help bring about the Perestroika deception? The furthest anyone seems to go with JPII is that he was simply a Modernist and a heretic.
That is exactly correct. That person was not the real sister Lucia that was interviewed later on.
That’s the imposter lucy whom the vatican 2 popes had been presenting to the public. I believe they are all involved in the coverup. Just wondering what they did to the real Sister Lucia dos Santos?
Lord HAVE MERCY ON US
the message can never be discredited because lady of akita confirms it.....but if pope john23 nevver read message when explicitly was told to by not only sister Lucia but actually immaculate heart of virgin mary and disobeyed blessed mother's wish, then how can we not believe that the wheels were in motion just before or just after , that sister Lucia had to GO..
Did the REAL Sister Lucia live past 1960? If she were, say, 10 years old in 1917, she would be 53 in 1960. Then 63 in 1970, then 73 in 1980. Then 83 in 1990, and 93 in 2000. Did the Seer of Fatima, Sister Lucia, live that long? If she died when was that? The Fatima message should not be watered down, but by introducing a fake Sister Lucia it makes most believer suspicious of the Church’s motives. This speaker can try to convince us to not believe our eyes, but c’mon already… 🤨
He read it in the presence of some of the Cardinals. He is said to have turned white and was visibly upset.
@@annap7678 yes but i believe, he said it was not of his time and stashed it away..
Sister Agnes Sasagawa from Akita, Japan, was also silenced by the VATICAN II SECT.
Yes people the Vatican is run by the St Gallen Mafia.....who control the popes .....they made pope Benedict resign or die .
People can be threatened to stay silent.
That would not have worked on Sister Lucia. It’s why she was removed.
Sister Lucia talked to Our Blessed Mother and Jesus. She would never play Satan's game, she would have died before betraying OUR LORD.
Why insert the message about joining in the First Saturdays during the speaker's message? Why not just do it up front before the speaker begins? We miss the complete message he's trying to deliver.
Bertone was a modernist who was called the pink pope referring to his questionable masculinity and was a proven liar. Tom
That is purely a lie, if you want to convince yourself that they never have a fake sister Lucy go ahead and do that, you are telling me that sister Lucy decided to betrayed our lady and Jesus christ and decided to join the people that were trying to destroy the church, even when she saw hell fire?
Thank you for your comment. Yes, we agree. The subject of the photos from 1967 onward could not have been the true Sister Lucia. The woman was an imposter. Please see Mr. Rodriguez' full discussion of the subject at rumble.com/v4nq6mb-a-false-sister-lucia-by-david-rodrguez-fc24-dallas-tx.html
The fake sister Lucy is the one who discredited the Fatima message.
It doesn't matter when that's not the real Sister Lucia.
Why don't you talk with Sr Lucy Truth❓ Not like the Fatima Center doesn't know him
This guy is a bad Tap dancer
David, please stop screaming. There's a difference between enthusiasm, passion, and angry screaming. You need to learn how to speak 'on the breathe. Your vocal chords on turning into sandpaper. Your voice distracts from the message. Thank you!
THANK YOU FATHER FOR YOUR PASSSION. WE NEED THIS FOR PEOPLE TO WAKE UP.😊