Watch all new episodes of The UnXplained, Fridays at 9/8c, and stay up to date on all of your favorite The HISTORY Channel shows at history.com/schedule.
Where‘s the new research they’re promising in their video description? Which shall proof evidence of a „man“ made structure? The most interesting thing on Antarctica was this „it’s evil“ comment from Buzz Aldrin when he visited Antarctica a couple of years ago. But I guess he was referring to human made climate change and that this „is evil“…
I visited antartica 4 times when i served in the chilean army. On one occasion i flew to a base called glaciar union. Glaciar union is about 25 km away from the supposed pyramid. I visited the so called pyramid in 2019 in a treck organised because many new people in the base wanted to see it. Seeing it first hand i can tell you that the pyramid is nothing more than a small rocky hill. From space it looks like a pyramid but when you look it from a close distance its clearly a natural structure.
@@CornPopWazABadDudeI visited Antarctica more than 12 times as a maximum level intelligence officer, and I can also confirm that this pyramid is a totally natural structure.
@@CornPopWazABadDude They also sent me to Mars, so I can hereby confirm that all the ancient ruins and machinery artifacts out there are also nothing but totally natural structures. What else do you want me to confirm? 🤣
I am a former intelligence agent and part of my job was to infiltrate @felipebeltran2705 and @ancientremains1814 and their social circles for few years. I can confirm that they are legit masters of bullshido.
If true, this would be absolute proof of crust displacement; in other words, the surface of the Earth was once in different positions. It would also prove that there was a very advanced civilization that significantly pre-dates our oldest records.
This pyrimyd/mountain was found years ago, they've had plenty of time to go examine the site and take samples. I mean it should be pretty easy to differentiate between natural and manmade on close inspection. The fact that it has been years since the discovery and we are still only being shown satellite images and speculation kinda makes me doubt that it is unnatural.
@@00_runner That's nonsense. When we were there for our 6 months term we had no such restrictions. The environment was the only thing that hindered exploration
History channel in a nutshell: "So could it be?.." "it is believed.." "this might be.." "We think that.." "it looks like.." it seems to be.." Me: excuse me sir? Is this history channel or speculation channel?
Do you know anything about science? If scientists were concerned with accuracy and technicality, they would phrase their sentences the same way. Even gravity is "just a theory".
Are you sure that history is “actual” history? Maybe there is more like this now because people are beginning to discover the hidden truths of the world, hidden by those with power to keep their power. 🤷♂️
when 'actual history' was just white men, what they 'discovered' when indigenous people's around the world already had knowledge on subjects such as agriculture, architecture, and geographic intelligence.
@@hendricksonrunner5015 I've seen a lot of mountains, and this is definitely one of them. People like to try to see meaning and structure where it does not exist. While it's possible that it's a pyramid built by man at a time when Antarctica was sub-tropical, that chance is so close to zero that it's on par with the chance that ghosts, aliens, dragons *AND* unicorns are all real. Basically not even worth bringing up...
I noticed some of the structure is off from being square and one of the ridge line I skewered . it would be cool if it was true but someone needs to take a closer look.
I love shows like this. They always say things like "so is this evidence that there could have possibly may have been?" and you think to yourself "nah"
It's neat when they bring attention to these things. You just need a massive grain of salt to go with it. Those are probably natural formations. But it would be really neat to investigate.
I can imagine that biologists and archeologists are more than curious what lies under the ice ! There will be a treasure trove of what life was millions of years ago when Antarctica was covered with trees and vegetation !
This is an earlier video about this there are later ones saying that they know now the N and S poles become as they are saying in this video ever few million years
It's in the book people refuse to believe. God separated them, the land and confused their language so they only understood their kind. How did the ice get so thick over dry land ? I believe it was from the Flood.
It's the 2nd biggest & only fully functional/active pyramid in the world right now. The biggest and most magnetic pyramid that we know of is between Florida, Puerto Rico, and Bermuda on the ocean floor. This was detected with a marine magnetometer, and the strength was tested using a Gaussmeters, aka Tesla meter. They've gone twice to check it out.
It’s been proven to be a natural landscape. There are hundreds like this in the area. Also the dimensions are not nearly as “perfect” as they made it sound.
I honestly hate the "history" channel. Its so full of pure lies. The antarctic pyramids were literally discovered over a hundred years ago (1910) and the process that formed them is well understood. The pyramids is formed by cirque erosion of glaciers which converge on a central point. This same process has happened in numerous locations around the world. For example, the matterhorn, a mountain in the Alps or mt.snowdon in wales.
It's been proven huh... Yeah I don't trust nothing unless I see it in front of my face... Unfortunately you can't trust anything nowadays unless you see it firsthand..
Yup, I honestly didn't bother watching the full thing because it's pretty easy to see what direction they wanted to take the video considering how they edited it.
I think someone needs to take an expedition to those rocks and see if they are seperate rocks like the pyramids or just degraded rock from being under ice. I mean any symmetry is weird but not impossble by natural means.
Thats already been done and people have known about this mountain range since the 1930s The pyramidal mountain, which doesn't have a formal name, is one of the many peaks that make up Antarctica's Ellsworth Mountains, which were discovered by the American aviator Lincoln Ellsworth during a flight on Nov. 23, 1935, according to a 2007 research paper that was published by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). More specifically, the unnamed mountain - located at 79°58’39.25"S 81°57’32.21"W - is in the southern part of the Ellsworth Mountains in an area called Heritage Range, which is known for its extraordinary fossils, including those of Cambrian-period trilobites from more than 500 million years ago, according to a 1972 USGS report. The mountain isn't that tall by planetary standards - just 4,150 feet (1,265 meters) - or a little less than one-fifth the height of Denali, the tallest mountain in North America, according to Google Earth. The mountain may not have Denali's height, but its unique pyramidal shape sets it apart, said Mauri Pelto, a professor of environmental science at Nichols College in Dudley, Massachusetts. Freeze-thaw erosion likely led to its pyramid-like shape, Pelto said. This happens when snow or water fills up cracks within a mountain during the day. When night falls and temperatures drop, the snow freezes and expands, turning into ice. The expanding ice causes the cracks to grow, Pelto said. This freeze-thaw erosion happens countless times, leading to the creation of larger cracks that can, eventually, cause entire rock sections to break off, he said. These forces likely also shaped other pyramidal mountains, including the Matterhorn in the Alps, he said.
Well considering the Earth possesses thousands of pyramid structures through out it's continents , having a pyramid structure in Antarctica would not surprise me .
How do you know what happened 100 years ago, were you there? Someone else was and they wrote it down right? That's good enough to know for sure what really happened? No biases or misconceptions? Only facts?
@@antony3482 there’s bias and there’s “an agricultural society created a 2km square pyramid in a frozen desert.” And you don’t need to individually and personally reconfirm all information, how does the saying go? ‘great science is built on the shoulders of giants’
@J Lund not even God is perfect. Remember the bible specifically mentions "Let us make them in our own image." If mankind was made in God's image we should also be as perfect as them. Younshould read the bible more often
It looks totally natural to me. Incredible forms are found in nature, yet it is not form; but rather composition that shows something to be not natural. This is just hype.
I must say I’m impressed with how the history channel gets away with their questionnaire-like ‘documentaries’ . It’s literally just a bunch of hypotheticals and guesses, questions and guesstimations with absolutely no conclusion other than a reformulation of what had already been said in the introduction. I don’t need a documentary to be a perfect academic piece of work but I’d expect it to be coherent and informative at the very least. There already is so much disinformation and dissonance that we don’t need to further nudge unfounded ideas. There is a lot of responsibility in education and the spreading of information through different platforms should be considered beyond the lines of freedom of speech and or other worldly amendments.
Because that extreme weather can’t possibly be blurring the lines by covering it with tons of ice and snow….. And who ever said pyramids were Egyptian? They’re not even the oldest known pyramids by a long shot.
@@ThePinkBinks Seriously? Do you actually think any of that is sensible, or are you making jokes? (Sarcasm is notoriously difficult to communicate in text form.)
So, these guys made a whole episode on suspicion of pyramid, I watched to get a confirmation if there is really a pyramid in Antarctica, but they themselves are asking questions such as “if this is true… is it really possible…”!
The pyramidal mountain, which doesn't have a formal name, is one of the many peaks that make up Antarctica's Ellsworth Mountains, which were discovered by the American aviator Lincoln Ellsworth during a flight on Nov. 23, 1935, according to a 2007 research paper that was published by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). More specifically, the unnamed mountain - located at 79°58’39.25"S 81°57’32.21"W - is in the southern part of the Ellsworth Mountains in an area called Heritage Range, which is known for its extraordinary fossils, including those of Cambrian-period trilobites from more than 500 million years ago, according to a 1972 USGS report. The mountain isn't that tall by planetary standards - just 4,150 feet (1,265 meters) - or a little less than one-fifth the height of Denali, the tallest mountain in North America, according to Google Earth. The mountain may not have Denali's height, but its unique pyramidal shape sets it apart, said Mauri Pelto, a professor of environmental science at Nichols College in Dudley, Massachusetts. Freeze-thaw erosion likely led to its pyramid-like shape, Pelto said. This happens when snow or water fills up cracks within a mountain during the day. When night falls and temperatures drop, the snow freezes and expands, turning into ice. The expanding ice causes the cracks to grow, Pelto said. This freeze-thaw erosion happens countless times, leading to the creation of larger cracks that can, eventually, cause entire rock sections to break off, he said. These forces likely also shaped other pyramidal mountains, including the Matterhorn in the Alps, he said.
That is because it doesn't fit in with evolution to hard for them to explain. However it does help to prove the great flood and that the pyramids where actually built by a much bigger antediluvian population.
This is a great example of how to apply Occam's Razor: Theory A: This photo is of an ancient pyramid built by an unknown human civilization in Antarctica. This theory requires completely upending all known archaeology, anthropology and history. It requires explaining when and how humans could possibly have built such a thing when the Antarctic has been basically the same climate it is now for all of the human species existence. Theory B: It's just a mountain that happens to look like a pyramid. Given all the many mountain forms tectonics and erosion can create a pointy one with four sides was one inevitable result. Which theory is simpler? Which theory requires less leaps?
Same theory can explain the moon landings, either A it was all faked or B it was all real, what is simpler. Clearly it was simpler to go to the darn moon then fake the entire thing.
People mostly follow the crowd. Science, archaeology, geologist, history anthropology all change over time when what was not accepted become accepted to most then again follow the crowd. I for one follow the Bible.(nothing new under the sun. What is has already been.) Can you go to the Pole's any where you want? Or do you have to have permission? I agree that a lot of this is made up to sell. Not all is some information is in plain sight but the crowd say impossible, so it becomes impossible. Sometimes they are paid, threatened, or just fear being ruined so they say what is wanted not what they really think. Example the earth is round, The earth orbit's the sun. Today It is the crowd that agree with this not a long time ago you would have been ruined to say that. Yet ancient civilizations already knew this. Another example is flat earth today laughed at, what If they were talking about a parallel universe hence flat because parallel cannot be round. That is a lot of writing just to say the simplest theory is not always the correct one. A theory is just that a theory. A fact always has an exception always ,even if it is not known.
It is so obvious that this is just a mountain. I am open to the idea of there potentially being ruins under the ice of Antarctica. But this is clearly just a mountain. It just makes you look stupid and crazy trying to present the pictures of that mountain as evidence of a Pyramid.
@@retributionpics Exactly right. If we find archeological evidence of settlements or even mega structures beneath Antarctic ice, I would be amazed and very curious to know more about it. It would change the human history as we know it. But randomly picking a picture of a mountain and claiming it as a pyramid will only trivialize entire enthusiasm about Antarctica.
The great Pyramids in Egypt didnt even look like Pyramids after 3k years of being abandoned. The marble, Gold and limestone broke apart and it looked more like a pile of rubble. From 1300 to 1700 much of it was taken as it was more valuable material and the pyramids where reshaped around 1800 to look more like pyramids again. If not for modern interference it wouldnt look much different from the "pyramids" we see in Alaska or Antarctica that could very well just be sharp mountains or Megalifts with stuff piled on it. We have seen Megalifts structures that are well older then any civilization we have today like that.
Its well known across the Marijuana community that the pyramids were build by the predators for there yearly population control hunts,we could sure use them now,these violent criminals and gangs could be offered up.for free,
So you don't believe in Ice Cores recovered from Antarctica? As far as the pyramids go, There might need to be a study done. Visiting the site could debunk it immediately. How do you believe science works? Should a hypothesis be rejected because it sounds crazy to you? If so everything you use in modern life should be thrown away.
Feels like History channel sometimes don’t think twice, they immediately go with the most impossible answer, “our ancestors could have lived here, ET’s might live here!”, why not to do more research?! It just might be a really precise mountain formation that our mother nature made with cold winds and snow!!! Think twice people!!
Obviously it's Jesus. I know that because the same face appeared on my best friends burnt toast many years ago, and while it's true he's a drinker, who sometimes exaggerates, I've never known him to lie outright.. in fact, his whole family verified it was a miracle. Explain THAT, unbelievers! 🤤
Just send someone there to check it out. It's totally improbable that people all of a sudden decided to build pyramids in an area that is mostly dark for part of the year. I'm willing to bet it's just a geologic formation that resembles pyramids. The fact that something resembles some other known object, doesn't mean it's also the same. If something is the shape of the Space Shuttle, it doesn't mean there were Space Shuttles 20,000 years ago.
It isn't likely that anyone will go, one wrong move and you could be eaten by polar bears, trapped in a crevice, freeze to death, run out of food. Most likely there will be shows like this, but not enough interest to get someone to take a team out there to do anything.
@@vipervidsgamingplus5723 If the researchers thought their evidence of a pyramid was solid, they would have gotten funding for a team long ago. Pyramids discovered in the harshest place on Earth is the kind of find that defines careers. Researchers don't really think that was a pyramid (or at least they aren't confident enough to say it is), which is why nothing is happening after six years
@@vipervidsgamingplus5723 Wrong part of the world. Polar bears live in the North Pole. Penguins live in the South Pole. The other options are likely though - freezing or falling into a crevice. Food's not much of an issue as humans can survive for a while without that. Ignoring the cold and safety issues, you could live almost long enough to walk across all of Antarctica before starving to death theoretically. With the cold, you wouldn't make it nearly as far due to the extra calories required to keep up your internal heat.
One summer season, in Mactown, on the Ice in the 90's, my surveyor friend was flown across the Ross Sea by Navy helos and was lowered down on to the top of this peak to mark it. It is called the Pyramid because it resembles a pyramid, even from across the sea-ice in McMurdo. It is not a pyramid, it is natural.
Yea, the channel’s talking about ice cores and imagining scenarios. It’s best to just head to the location (as your friend did), check it out and report back (as you did). So, thanks ;) Gonna finish watching this and see how “high this pyramid goes”...
"One summer season, in Mactown, on the Ice in the 90's, my surveyor friend was flown across the Ross Sea by Navy helos and was lowered down on to the top of this peak to mark it." And it would destroy the History Channel's pseudoscience narrative if they ever mentioned that.
All the channels that get close to zero views do it. Just like how mtv dosent play music. Discovery is moon shiners and drag races. Animal planet actually has hunting shows now. And history channel covers aliens and big foot. Next year we'll all be getting our computers fixed at the gym, and then go buy beer at the local library.
Yes there's also an old abandoned soviet mining town in Svalbard in the Arctic circle called Pyramiden, it's named after the mountain nearby because the mountain has a pyramid like shape. I honestly think these massive pyramid like structures in Antarctica are probably just mountains. It would be incredible to find a real pyramid in Antarctica but I think it would be highly unlikely.
So, you mean to tell me that, around 4000 BC, the same rough time period of the Bibical flood, where the landscape was hugely shifted and temperatures around the world changed, was when Antarctica experienced a drastic change in climate. Huh. So weird, I'm sure we'll never figure it out.
It wasn't a drastic shift. Antarctica used to be further north with a tropical climate. Tectonic drift took it south to where it is now. We're talking millions of years.
@@mrwakacorp it was actually 90 million, but that’s only speculation, we’ve been wrong about almost everything until we discovered artifact, the new pyramids/remains they are finding in the Amazon from deforestation debunk the theory that we came to North America during the ice age over ice bridges, it’s now accepted that we were here before that but they don’t know how, and how did they share Egyptian beleifs when they existed 1000s of years apart separated by seas. The new evidence shows the Amazon became the jungle it is, because humans planted trees that took over the area long after they died.
"It has a PERFECTLY square base..." Perfectly square if your eyes are cross-eyed and you think not even close to perfect means PERFECTLY squared. It's amazing how when people have an agenda to prove a conclusion that they will see things that are obviously false as if they were true.
NEIN! This a secret military base built on the hight of the third Reich. It's located in a area wich is called Neuschwabenland. My grandfather was a snow plow driver back then, he told us all of it!
This video made me face palm so hard I look like I'm surviving an abusive relationship. You're as blind as Ray Charles in the womb if you think the base of that mountain is even remotely close to square.. I'm fairly certain Hellen Keller suffering from stage 4 hypothermia could both draw a more perfect square than insinuated in this video and identify it visually.
OK as a Canadian, I feel obliged to say that I'm sorry.. This roast was triggered by this absolute mockery of actual history.. Hindsight is always 20/20. I look forward to using this mistake as an opportunity to be a better person. Looking back I now see this comment was made from an ignorant POV but no offence to blind people you can't really see my point
Yeah, that was a lie. This video is also a lie as this is a known mountain range that has been known about since the 1930s. The pyramidal mountain, which doesn't have a formal name, is one of the many peaks that make up Antarctica's Ellsworth Mountains, which were discovered by the American aviator Lincoln Ellsworth during a flight on Nov. 23, 1935, according to a 2007 research paper that was published by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). More specifically, the unnamed mountain - located at 79°58’39.25"S 81°57’32.21"W - is in the southern part of the Ellsworth Mountains in an area called Heritage Range, which is known for its extraordinary fossils, including those of Cambrian-period trilobites from more than 500 million years ago, according to a 1972 USGS report. The mountain isn't that tall by planetary standards - just 4,150 feet (1,265 meters) - or a little less than one-fifth the height of Denali, the tallest mountain in North America, according to Google Earth. The mountain may not have Denali's height, but its unique pyramidal shape sets it apart, said Mauri Pelto, a professor of environmental science at Nichols College in Dudley, Massachusetts. Freeze-thaw erosion likely led to its pyramid-like shape, Pelto said. This happens when snow or water fills up cracks within a mountain during the day. When night falls and temperatures drop, the snow freezes and expands, turning into ice. The expanding ice causes the cracks to grow, Pelto said. This freeze-thaw erosion happens countless times, leading to the creation of larger cracks that can, eventually, cause entire rock sections to break off, he said. These forces likely also shaped other pyramidal mountains, including the Matterhorn in the Alps, he said.
Wow, what a reach. As a certified armchair scientist, I can tell just by the shadow alone it's an organic, natural mountain formation. They actually built a whole show around this with William Shatner narrating and everything? lol
Yes, the flood of Noah changed many things including the oxygen levels in the atmosphere. They find trees under the ice, more proof the Earth’s atmosphere was vastly different not too long ago contrary to the unprovable equations used to justify evolution!
@@stiimuli actually no, alot less than that. Theres is maps of Antarctica before ice. Check out Graham Hancok interview with Joe Rogan. Really interesting stuff
I watched a documentary on the Anti-Diluvian Period here on UA-cam. It makes a compelling case for that very thing as well as many other theories. The archeologist that was making the presentation tried to be neutral on whether it was evidence for Creation or evolution.
@@SmithyyGCN evolution is quite obviously an established scientific fact whether Antarctica was recently ice-less or not. These people who try to pretend they are neutral are really just creationists trying to create doubt. This is what they do since they can never prove anything.
@@sigmundferd1359 the ice in Antarctica is two miles thick in places , it would have to snow mighty frickin hard for that to build up within the span of written history ! 1 foot of snow when compacted equals about an inch of ice and there are 63360 inches in a mile . That would be roughly 126, 720 feet of snow ! Doesn't seem very likely now does it ! That's roughly 633 feet of snow a year if and only if zero snow melted .
The people who say it's just a mountain confuse me. Look at all of the other mountains, 100% random and unpredictable in shape and form. Even height, but a perfectly square mountain? Two perfectly square mountains? It's wildly unlikely especially considering the structure of the other mountains in the region which just don't have that kind of consistent shape and definitely leans towards a man made object structure. It's sort of relating to the argument for Creationism, there is so much evidence towards intelligent design that it is more likely than not that there was A creator, or that we were at some point created. True atheism is so unbelievably rare because it's a leap of faith in a place and time which just doesn't really support it anymore, especially when we have the Webb telescope and everything it's uncovered about the origin of our universe.
1. Those "pyramids" are clearly rocky mountainous formations -- a single structure, rather than blocks of stone, as the true pyramids in Egypt and the Americas are. So, unless ancient humans carved pyramids out of a single mountain -- a superhuman feat way beyond today's technology -- looks like they're just works of nature. 2. Antartica WAS a much milder, rainforest climate once. But that was tens of millions of years ago, when human ancestors were shrew-like creatures scuttling under the feet of the great dinosaurs. Since the time of man, the continent has been a block of ice. I do love a great folk tale, though.
The pyramidal mountain, which doesn't have a formal name, is one of the many peaks that make up Antarctica's Ellsworth Mountains, which were discovered by the American aviator Lincoln Ellsworth during a flight on Nov. 23, 1935, according to a 2007 research paper that was published by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). More specifically, the unnamed mountain - located at 79°58’39.25"S 81°57’32.21"W - is in the southern part of the Ellsworth Mountains in an area called Heritage Range, which is known for its extraordinary fossils, including those of Cambrian-period trilobites from more than 500 million years ago, according to a 1972 USGS report. The mountain isn't that tall by planetary standards - just 4,150 feet (1,265 meters) - or a little less than one-fifth the height of Denali, the tallest mountain in North America, according to Google Earth. The mountain may not have Denali's height, but its unique pyramidal shape sets it apart, said Mauri Pelto, a professor of environmental science at Nichols College in Dudley, Massachusetts. Freeze-thaw erosion likely led to its pyramid-like shape, Pelto said. This happens when snow or water fills up cracks within a mountain during the day. When night falls and temperatures drop, the snow freezes and expands, turning into ice. The expanding ice causes the cracks to grow, Pelto said. This freeze-thaw erosion happens countless times, leading to the creation of larger cracks that can, eventually, cause entire rock sections to break off, he said. These forces likely also shaped other pyramidal mountains, including the Matterhorn in the Alps, he said.
If this proves true in the near future, then yes, this will indeed be relevant for the HISTORY channel. You can mock the pyramid theory, but core samples with the plant specimens is hard science.
Why doesn't the clip show the age of those core samples with plants? Likely because it is from millions of years not thousands. The video implies this was recent but the scientist doesn't.
@@jordonbeem1184 the implications of humans in antartica millions of years ago is earth shattering to say the least. The ice will continue to melt. And we're going to rewrite history. Prepare yourselves accordingly.
- Some random mountain in Antartica: "I'm not square, I'm not triangular, you can't really see me because I'm covered in ice. I'm not a pyramid." - History channel: "You are a pyramid."
@@musicluvr70 Search more pictures. Those from the top with the bigger zoom out shows clearly it's part of a larger mountain structure. Here on youtube they cherry picked images to fool everyone.
History: "There's all these crazy pyramids all over the place." Me: "Those are mountains." History: "Ohhhh... Good thing we're not the Geography channel."
I wouldn't doubt it. I have long believed that antarctic was once in the tropic zone and was a flourishing capital that stretched its empire to all other continents of the world. I thinknit may have been the ancient civilization of Atlantis and had pyramids just as Egypt does and as other countries do. A meteor hit it and created a huge crater that was so magnetized it pulled the whole crust around the mantle towards the south pole. Which made it freeze suddenly and brought the already frozen ice into the tropics which melted and cause the great flood. That would explain alot about why we find artifacts and stories from around the world about the civilization and ive heard recent reports that they may have found the place of impact. All of this is theory but I think more and more information point this. Well never know until we find absolute proof though so I have my fingers crossed 🤞. Imagine what we could discover
Or (if you are a believer) the water canopy before the flood produced a greenhouse effect on the planet evenly distributing the heat, and after the flood deserts started forming and Antarctica iced up due to the angle of the earth and exposure to sunlight without the water canopy.
@@valerieshipston I meant if you believe in the bible account of the flood. Genesis 1:6,7 talks about 2 bodies of water being divided by 'heaven' or sky. Meaning there was once a water canopy surrounding earth. The flood waters would have come from that canopy.
It's possible that humans could build a pyramid over there. In 1513 year Piri Reis made a Map of the World with Antarctic without Ice, there are rivers, lakes and exact shape of shoreline as we know now.
The real brilliant part about these pyramids is how the builders constructed them to be indistinguishable from natural mountain formations. We can't even do that today. They must have used lasers!
Before watching: This ought to be good.. "History" channel has such a great reputation for documenting facts. After watching: Not disappointed. Promised utter conjecture based on flimsy evidence and delivered just that. 10/10.
An entire episode based on a clearly mistaken observation of a “perfectly” shaped mountain, explained by authors of science fiction books. And all this on the ‘HISTORY’ channel. Rating is everything.
@@Flexyourmemes Why are you being like this 😂.. My point is that his "scientific" argument is that a people would only believe something if it was true. But in societies there are myths propaganda etc. that people believe in that are not true. Therefore just because people believe something it does not mean that its true. The people could have been lied to and they continued believing it.. He should base his conclusions on finding artifacts that prove the belief rather than asserting that people can only believe something if it is true. I hope this clarifies my point 😇
They wont because they know for a fact that it isnt because these mountains were discovered in 1930s The pyramidal mountain, which doesn't have a formal name, is one of the many peaks that make up Antarctica's Ellsworth Mountains, which were discovered by the American aviator Lincoln Ellsworth during a flight on Nov. 23, 1935, according to a 2007 research paper that was published by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS). More specifically, the unnamed mountain - located at 79°58’39.25"S 81°57’32.21"W - is in the southern part of the Ellsworth Mountains in an area called Heritage Range, which is known for its extraordinary fossils, including those of Cambrian-period trilobites from more than 500 million years ago, according to a 1972 USGS report. The mountain isn't that tall by planetary standards - just 4,150 feet (1,265 meters) - or a little less than one-fifth the height of Denali, the tallest mountain in North America, according to Google Earth. The mountain may not have Denali's height, but its unique pyramidal shape sets it apart, said Mauri Pelto, a professor of environmental science at Nichols College in Dudley, Massachusetts. Freeze-thaw erosion likely led to its pyramid-like shape, Pelto said. This happens when snow or water fills up cracks within a mountain during the day. When night falls and temperatures drop, the snow freezes and expands, turning into ice. The expanding ice causes the cracks to grow, Pelto said. This freeze-thaw erosion happens countless times, leading to the creation of larger cracks that can, eventually, cause entire rock sections to break off, he said. These forces likely also shaped other pyramidal mountains, including the Matterhorn in the Alps, he said.
@@tamingguppies my point is they already have scientists there in Antarctica for the very purpose of studying everything there. So if there were any evidence of man made pyramids they can just go over to where they are and confirm it instead of making full blown conclusions based on satellite photos. As far as I am concerned just go there and see weather it is or is not man made. Going to the site directly is the only way to know for sure.
@@Coinz8 Based on what you say here assuming it is absolutely true then that means the content of this video is knowingly pushing a lie. Wouldn't be the first time I heard of people lying for a sensational story.
@@kaanjel Some of the nutcases swear it was proven right. One guy traced the map and layered it over a map of the globe from today. Lot's of inaccuracies and he suggested that the continent that supposed to be "Antarctica" was more likely South America.
no.. have you actually seen that map? it's backwards. is missing major. ountain ranges that do exist irl. has formations on the map that dont exist irl. and is the completely wrong size.
@@FreebirthBoccara One error doesn't make another anymore than one true thing makes another. Any map could have some right parts and some wrong parts and most did.
You know, when researchers lack funding, they typically start making stuff up to get more funding. Also people have a tendency to want to see patterns where none exist. This is both of those cases
@@speckgens according to history channel, the faces on mars is a structure for when the free mason lived on mars before it lost it's atmosphere and they moved to earth
@@majorpwner241 it's not about the cleverness of any given individual. Clearly you don't know how information works and how compartmentalized access to it allows for complex processes to be carried out by people who couldn't complete the entire project individually. History and your access to truth has been compartmentalized and you have been given an acceptable version of the truth that facilitates modern life. You probably think all conspiracy theories are stupid because nobody would "keep it a secret" right? It would eventually get out? Yet you ignore the reality that institutions like governments learned a long time ago how to manipulate and direct access to information. You've got no access to classified data in this system and you don't see classified data being exposed all the time. You're dreaming if you think the version of history you have accepted is actually true.
@@danmoore6062 No, I think things like the JFK assassination were very clearly perpetrated by the government, and you'd have to be as big a mook to believe that official story as you'd have to be to believe some illuminati or some NWO is actually controlling the world and all information therein. There's things people simply don't know because it was lost to history or never known to begin with, but everything has to be some wild conspiracy against you. Why?
@@majorpwner241 Why are you continually projecting this notion that I believe it is against me personally? You're clearly just trying to lazily attach this label to me so you can feel satisfied with your opinion of me. You're not listening. Just because some things might be lost to history doesn't exclude the possibility that the people in power have created a beneficial control of the history that we do currently have access to right? You seem to think you can propose certain things that you believe rule out what I'm saying. Even if entire civilizations were lost to history that we have never learned about, that doesn't mean that the history we do have access to hasn't been intentionally manipulated. I don't believe the world is run by 9 men in robes in a dark room laughing maniacally about subjugating the whole world. I do believe we have been led into an intentional gilded cage in which the information we engage with and the power structures we exist under are controlled by a hierarchy we don't have access to. I don't believe the President of the United States runs the United States. The roots run deeper and I have research and legitimate reasons for thinking this. If you want to just call me a delusional paranoid and then go about your day thinking you're smarter than me or whatever then be my guest. I'm only pointing out how the system plays defense for itself through entertainment and control over the relationship minds develop with information they are exposed to. I am thinking on a layer you aren't even considering.
Watch all new episodes of The UnXplained, Fridays at 9/8c, and stay up to date on all of your favorite The HISTORY Channel shows at history.com/schedule.
How do you pin a comment 6 days before the video was posted to UA-cam this video was uploaded less then 2 hours ago
@@Chameleonjones exacly 💩🤔🤔🤔🤔
Keep deleting my comments History. You know Ive found better stuff then this on my channel.
@@Chameleonjones you upload it 6 days ago.. And comment on it. But only release it now.
Tension guy's this is common it's not a mysterious thing 😆
I can see where this is heading.There is an alien queen down in the pyramid and soon the Predators will show up.
Yup, the next big thing they will try to scare us with.
Lol that movie was soo bad
1st thing I thought!! 😆 🤣 😂
Same i thought of 😂😂
There is apparently an ancient city down there. Many heads of state, including the Pope, have gone down to look at it.
that doesn't look like a pyramid... more like a mountain
yes and gunung padang looks like a mountain as well yet it is a man made
Stick with making sushi
It's obviously a mountain.
@@ileanaphillips1253 that's 100% a mountain. Also.... Santa isn't real, sorry.
main stream shill
It looks like a nicely shaped mountain
William Shatners voice is perfect for making a mountain shaped like a pyramid seem like it might be a real one.
Shhh, you’re ruining the fantasy 😎
Possibly a mountain, it wouldnt be a surprise if its a pyraid though. There are thousand of pyramids all around the world, most still under soil
maybe Atlantis being underwater meant snow
Where‘s the new research they’re promising in their video description? Which shall proof evidence of a „man“ made structure? The most interesting thing on Antarctica was this „it’s evil“ comment from Buzz Aldrin when he visited Antarctica a couple of years ago. But I guess he was referring to human made climate change and that this „is evil“…
I visited antartica 4 times when i served in the chilean army. On one occasion i flew to a base called glaciar union. Glaciar union is about 25 km away from the supposed pyramid. I visited the so called pyramid in 2019 in a treck organised because many new people in the base wanted to see it. Seeing it first hand i can tell you that the pyramid is nothing more than a small rocky hill. From space it looks like a pyramid but when you look it from a close distance its clearly a natural structure.
Oh ok, if YOU say so then I guess it's obviously true!
@@CornPopWazABadDudeI visited Antarctica more than 12 times as a maximum level intelligence officer, and I can also confirm that this pyramid is a totally natural structure.
@@ancientremains1814 suuuure you did buddy, suuuure you did
@@CornPopWazABadDude They also sent me to Mars, so I can hereby confirm that all the ancient ruins and machinery artifacts out there are also nothing but totally natural structures. What else do you want me to confirm? 🤣
I am a former intelligence agent and part of my job was to infiltrate @felipebeltran2705 and @ancientremains1814 and their social circles for few years. I can confirm that they are legit masters of bullshido.
That's the pyramid that was built by Predators so that they can harvest Aliens 👽 🤣 😳
Thank you! Was so afraidred I was the only one who saw the similarities.
Today predators harvest children
The only truth I believe 🤣
Facts bro
🤣🤣🤣
Back in my day, the History Channel had integrity.
yeah it was factual, but now its entertainment just like WWE
Like Dogfights, Battle 360 . . .
tegridy weed
Makes me cry! :(
Now its Bigfoot chupacabra horseshit
I'm still waiting for the day when:
Episodes like these are actually solved, and not perpetuated.
Can't keep you watching that way.
Its like a soap opera...they keep you hanging.....which the same reason why they never find Bigfoot....if they ever did, then its game over.
@@Slo-ryde Yeah, we'd just trap it and eat it and Kim K would have a mansuit out o it.
Like Bigfoot, the story just keeps going..
Like Oak Island. Just keeps going
If true, this would be absolute proof of crust displacement; in other words, the surface of the Earth was once in different positions. It would also prove that there was a very advanced civilization that significantly pre-dates our oldest records.
Finally a comment that’s interesting
@@veontaywalkerexactly. Others have small minds and fear even the slightest change to their small world views.
See Graham Hancock.
Delusional
Someone with a brain. Nice post
This pyrimyd/mountain was found years ago, they've had plenty of time to go examine the site and take samples. I mean it should be pretty easy to differentiate between natural and manmade on close inspection. The fact that it has been years since the discovery and we are still only being shown satellite images and speculation kinda makes me doubt that it is unnatural.
They don't have the permission to wonder off wherever they want - basically not allowed.
@@00_runner That's nonsense. When we were there for our 6 months term we had no such restrictions. The environment was the only thing that hindered exploration
Right ✅️ some people whants to make us wonder never give any answers. Like there is purpose to it.
@@shawnl9523 What did you research there?
The fact that it’s on the history channel should already cause said speculation.
I love how the "History" channel has fully embraced becoming the "Fantasy" channel
Explain ?
@@toscanoplaster5603 This channel is nothing more than a sensationaliost tabloid of pseudoscience and pseudoarcheology and alternative facts
It’s like entertainers being “politicians”
@@toscanoplaster5603 lmao, you must be just watching CN😂
💯% facts. They also found a rectangle shape mountain that is said to be an ancient Walmart
Remember when the History Channel had programs that were historical and provided factual information?
Peppridge Farms remembers.
Maybe documentary on admiral Bird's exposition in the 30s or 40s? It was early. There was an oasis, pyramids I believe as well. Check it out
Too many Predator sequels. Lmao
Yeah it was lame. Now its way better
@@sashaalpatru8100 best of the day!
we are going back to the void century with this one😂😂😂
History channel in a nutshell:
"So could it be?.." "it is believed.."
"this might be.." "We think that.."
"it looks like.." it seems to be.."
Me: excuse me sir? Is this history channel or speculation channel?
Hahhaha so true
Do you know anything about science? If scientists were concerned with accuracy and technicality, they would phrase their sentences the same way. Even gravity is "just a theory".
@@abominationdesolation8322 they are
I am old enough to remember when The History Channel was about actual history.
Are you sure that history is “actual” history? Maybe there is more like this now because people are beginning to discover the hidden truths of the world, hidden by those with power to keep their power. 🤷♂️
when 'actual history' was just white men, what they 'discovered' when indigenous people's around the world already had knowledge on subjects such as agriculture, architecture, and geographic intelligence.
@@teydo14 ooops, your tinfoil hat fell off.
@@j.jester7821 😂
When was that?
The best example of this (the 2km square) is still not even close to symmetrical. It's just a mountain.
@@hendricksonrunner5015 I've seen a lot of mountains, and this is definitely one of them. People like to try to see meaning and structure where it does not exist. While it's possible that it's a pyramid built by man at a time when Antarctica was sub-tropical, that chance is so close to zero that it's on par with the chance that ghosts, aliens, dragons *AND* unicorns are all real. Basically not even worth bringing up...
I noticed some of the structure is off from being square and one of the ridge line I skewered . it would be cool if it was true but someone needs to take a closer look.
Closed minded must hurt
@@fibonacho nice! I mean really, all you need is the spirit of a dragon from another planet and you've got all three!
@@BRRB-pu4gy im very open minded. I'm also knowledgeable, smart, and realistic about probabilities.
When the history channel was actually about history, good times.
Don’t have cable, what do they show now?
Hey, anyone els here old enough to remember when the history channel made quality educational content?
Yes, sigh.
Why don't you come out of your box? There are many mysteries on this planet Michael. QUESTIONING is the beginning of science.
@@mullcrumthesage6303 yet blind belief without question is way worse! and the opposite of science.
@@mullcrumthesage6303 there's also a lot of facts that people need to be aware of.
Babble for babies same nlp programming
I love shows like this. They always say things like "so is this evidence that there could have possibly may have been?" and you think to yourself "nah"
Yes like, FACT = someone claimed something...... haha not a fact
Sometimes I just watch because it's fun to see what crazy ideas they come up with
@@hassassinator8858 what if the history books are a lie
@@diamondhectorgt6668 They are, but that's no excuse to say whatever lol
It's neat when they bring attention to these things. You just need a massive grain of salt to go with it. Those are probably natural formations. But it would be really neat to investigate.
I can imagine that biologists and archeologists are more than curious what lies under the ice ! There will be a treasure trove of what life was millions of years ago when Antarctica was covered with trees and vegetation !
We'll probably know the whole story in about a decade- one decade before we become extinct.
More like paleontologists but yeah
At The Mountains of Madness
This is an earlier video about this there are later ones saying that they know now the N and S poles become as they are saying in this video ever few million years
It's in the book people refuse to believe. God separated them, the land and confused their language so they only understood their kind.
How did the ice get so thick over dry land ? I believe it was from the Flood.
Everyone: nice mountains
History channel: let's say it's a piramid with ideal structure even if it's not.
I love how a perfectly drawn square around "the pyramid" doesn't actually meet the pyramid corners.
Covered in snow and possibly erosion that's why 🤦♂️ use some common sense sometimes.
@@mop6278 You shouldn't be mentioning common sense lol
This is the stupidest comment i have seen.
@@mop6278 you're telling someone else to use common sense in this discussion? 😆😅🤣😂🤣😅😆🤣😅😂🤣😆😁😆🤣
@@docv73 no doubt !
Outlineing the Pyramid "perfectly". I had to palm my face to hard. Very unethical video to bring these claims forward with such bad evidence.
Everyone forgot this was a faked photo in 2016
exactly lol, these docs always have that moment where they show "the perfect angle" or something , and its clearly far from perfect :D
You speak the truth, sir.
I guess I am old I remember when the History Channel much like CNN gave you just the facts
@@donise8406 And BOTH have devolved into a joke.
If your only tool is a hammer, everything looks like a nail.
imagination and the hammer . With those two things other tools can be made.
@@IANHANDS You may have missed the point of that figure of speech.
?
Imagination works itself no need in tool
His point is, If they're only looking for the unexplainable explanation, everything starts seeming like it's unexplainable.
It doesnt look like a pyramid... I believe there is stuff we don't know, but the footage in this video is just a mountain with a huge snow dune 😂😂
It's the 2nd biggest & only fully functional/active pyramid in the world right now. The biggest and most magnetic pyramid that we know of is between Florida, Puerto Rico, and Bermuda on the ocean floor. This was detected with a marine magnetometer, and the strength was tested using a Gaussmeters, aka Tesla meter. They've gone twice to check it out.
@@johns8120 Where did you get this information?
@kaanjel Do you have IG, FB or Tiktok I can send you a link or two.
@kaanjel I sent you a reply, and it disappeared, that's weird. I asked if you had FB, IG or tiktok and I could send you a couple links or videos.
It’s been proven to be a natural landscape. There are hundreds like this in the area. Also the dimensions are not nearly as “perfect” as they made it sound.
🤣🤣🤣
That means they are right.
Yes the dimensions they show are inaccurate.
I honestly hate the "history" channel.
Its so full of pure lies. The antarctic pyramids were literally discovered over a hundred years ago (1910) and the process that formed them is well understood.
The pyramids is formed by cirque erosion of glaciers which converge on a central point.
This same process has happened in numerous locations around the world. For example, the matterhorn, a mountain in the Alps or mt.snowdon in wales.
It's been proven huh... Yeah I don't trust nothing unless I see it in front of my face... Unfortunately you can't trust anything nowadays unless you see it firsthand..
Yup, I honestly didn't bother watching the full thing because it's pretty easy to see what direction they wanted to take the video considering how they edited it.
This finally explains why there was a Stargate in Antarctica. Thank you History Channel
This made me chuckle out loud. I wonder if we broke open that Pyramid, if the ZPM would still have power.
@@general330 idk I think we're a couple decades late.... it's probably in Atlantis already...
@@StrangeTerror Ah, you are correct. I always get confused when crossing SG1 and Atlantis time lines. Either way....glorious post.
jaja
The show was more fact based than this show. Haha
I love history channels logic.
"Why would they believe this if it was untrue?"
by that logic the aztec failed to kill enough people to feed the sun lol we should have no sunlight now lmao
I literally burst out laughing when the man said that. I can hardly breathe.
So storms really are angry gods?
But the people said that jesus walked on water, why would they believe this if it was untrue?
@@Hubris423 if Jesus can walk on water can he swim on land?
The narrator sounding like he is reciting a Dr Seuss book perfectly fits these type of conspiracy shows.
I think someone needs to take an expedition to those rocks and see if they are seperate rocks like the pyramids or just degraded rock from being under ice. I mean any symmetry is weird but not impossble by natural means.
Thats already been done and people have known about this mountain range since the 1930s The pyramidal mountain, which doesn't have a formal name, is one of the many peaks that make up Antarctica's Ellsworth Mountains, which were discovered by the American aviator Lincoln Ellsworth during a flight on Nov. 23, 1935, according to a 2007 research paper that was published by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).
More specifically, the unnamed mountain - located at 79°58’39.25"S 81°57’32.21"W - is in the southern part of the Ellsworth Mountains in an area called Heritage Range, which is known for its extraordinary fossils, including those of Cambrian-period trilobites from more than 500 million years ago, according to a 1972 USGS report.
The mountain isn't that tall by planetary standards - just 4,150 feet (1,265 meters) - or a little less than one-fifth the height of Denali, the tallest mountain in North America, according to Google Earth. The mountain may not have Denali's height, but its unique pyramidal shape sets it apart, said Mauri Pelto, a professor of environmental science at Nichols College in Dudley, Massachusetts.
Freeze-thaw erosion likely led to its pyramid-like shape, Pelto said. This happens when snow or water fills up cracks within a mountain during the day. When night falls and temperatures drop, the snow freezes and expands, turning into ice. The expanding ice causes the cracks to grow, Pelto said.
This freeze-thaw erosion happens countless times, leading to the creation of larger cracks that can, eventually, cause entire rock sections to break off, he said. These forces likely also shaped other pyramidal mountains, including the Matterhorn in the Alps, he said.
The ridge clearly continues to the mountain that is no way a pyramid form next to the so called pyramid
But Shitlner wouldn't have this job if they did. After all that kosher needs the money.
Well considering the Earth possesses thousands of pyramid structures through out it's continents , having a pyramid structure in Antarctica would not surprise me .
i am waiting for them to go visit the site of Noah's Ark....they keep showing on these satellite pics.......lol
What I see ... Somebody drew a perfect square around an asymmetrical mountain.
Stop using logic, we don't like that here at the History Channel
@@cameron9292 😏😏
I see that too, but I've seen that before and then they were right
@@Vshamann336 where?
I was laughing so hard when they did that 😂
First::: that's ANTARCTICA
Second::: that is what geologists call A MOUNTAIN.
They thought the one in Bosnia was a mountain too.....
Don’t doubt it..
I remember a time when history was based on actual facts, not click bait.
Yep. It's sad.
Adorable, you literally copied the comment below you just for likes from strangers LOL CRINGE
How do you know what happened 100 years ago, were you there? Someone else was and they wrote it down right? That's good enough to know for sure what really happened? No biases or misconceptions? Only facts?
@@antony3482 there’s bias and there’s “an agricultural society created a 2km square pyramid in a frozen desert.” And you don’t need to individually and personally reconfirm all information, how does the saying go? ‘great science is built on the shoulders of giants’
“What is history? But a fable agreed upon.” -Napoleon Bonaparte
I like how he said it's a *"perfect"* pyramid. The builders must have been drunk and he must be on acid to see it as perfect
true
Your mum's perfect though
hahahah
@J Lund preys him
@J Lund not even God is perfect. Remember the bible specifically mentions "Let us make them in our own image." If mankind was made in God's image we should also be as perfect as them. Younshould read the bible more often
It looks totally natural to me. Incredible forms are found in nature, yet it is not form; but rather composition that shows something to be not natural. This is just hype.
Agree, it looks natural. There are similar formations around the globe.
@@cabforwardooo9983 such as?
@@erlend6338 ever been to the grand canyon?
It's not real it's a fake photo from 2016 that became internet famous only. Probably from the flat earther people
The pyramids of Egypt was also created naturally 😁😁
Look at Byrds films from Operation Highjump 1946.Flyover.
What do it show
What do it show 😂😂😂😂😂
So what? Can't penguins build their own pyramids?
Great
Now I imagine those fuzzy things waddling around with whips
Don’t make penguins even more depressed they are free nation free from human labor.
First it was just Ancient Aliens… now the History Channel as a whole has lost its marbles.
The fantasy channel.
@@iamnegan1515 Just like the "Travel Channel." All about ghosts and paranormal rubbish.
the distraction channel eat it up
The marbles tournaments are on espn.
I liked the History channel alot more when it was the Hitler channel
"History" should change its name to "Fantasy"
I must say I’m impressed with how the history channel gets away with their questionnaire-like ‘documentaries’ . It’s literally just a bunch of hypotheticals and guesses, questions and guesstimations with absolutely no conclusion other than a reformulation of what had already been said in the introduction.
I don’t need a documentary to be a perfect academic piece of work but I’d expect it to be coherent and informative at the very least. There already is so much disinformation and dissonance that we don’t need to further nudge unfounded ideas. There is a lot of responsibility in education and the spreading of information through different platforms should be considered beyond the lines of freedom of speech and or other worldly amendments.
100%
95%
Well said
Thanks guys!
Misleading titles, that’s why I stopped watching
Sounds like they probably found a mountain, but I bet there are tons of cool discoveries to be found beneath the ice.
Nope, just more rocks
Obviously you know jack$hit about jack$hit.
@@standupstraight9691 Thanks for reporting on your most recent expedition. You're a true hero.
@@noonehere0987 LMAO
@@noonehere0987 . Hey I do what I can. I dont do it for the applause, just the cash.
Andrew's idea of a "perfect" pyramid shape is rather...imperfect. That pyramid looks more Picasso than Egyptian.
😂😂
Exactly, it clearly looked imperfect.
Because that extreme weather can’t possibly be blurring the lines by covering it with tons of ice and snow…..
And who ever said pyramids were Egyptian? They’re not even the oldest known pyramids by a long shot.
@@ThePinkBinks Seriously? Do you actually think any of that is sensible, or are you making jokes? (Sarcasm is notoriously difficult to communicate in text form.)
Glen W Well were you being serious or sarcastic?
The Cradle of Mankind is Antarctica and it will be ice-free again... soon.
So, these guys made a whole episode on suspicion of pyramid, I watched to get a confirmation if there is really a pyramid in Antarctica, but they themselves are asking questions such as “if this is true… is it really possible…”!
same
The pyramidal mountain, which doesn't have a formal name, is one of the many peaks that make up Antarctica's Ellsworth Mountains, which were discovered by the American aviator Lincoln Ellsworth during a flight on Nov. 23, 1935, according to a 2007 research paper that was published by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).
More specifically, the unnamed mountain - located at 79°58’39.25"S 81°57’32.21"W - is in the southern part of the Ellsworth Mountains in an area called Heritage Range, which is known for its extraordinary fossils, including those of Cambrian-period trilobites from more than 500 million years ago, according to a 1972 USGS report.
The mountain isn't that tall by planetary standards - just 4,150 feet (1,265 meters) - or a little less than one-fifth the height of Denali, the tallest mountain in North America, according to Google Earth. The mountain may not have Denali's height, but its unique pyramidal shape sets it apart, said Mauri Pelto, a professor of environmental science at Nichols College in Dudley, Massachusetts.
Freeze-thaw erosion likely led to its pyramid-like shape, Pelto said. This happens when snow or water fills up cracks within a mountain during the day. When night falls and temperatures drop, the snow freezes and expands, turning into ice. The expanding ice causes the cracks to grow, Pelto said.
This freeze-thaw erosion happens countless times, leading to the creation of larger cracks that can, eventually, cause entire rock sections to break off, he said. These forces likely also shaped other pyramidal mountains, including the Matterhorn in the Alps, he said.
That is because it doesn't fit in with evolution to hard for them to explain. However it does help to prove the great flood and that the pyramids where actually built by a much bigger antediluvian population.
I'm pretty sure that pyramid was built by Jesus in the future but it's a wormhole
Do you really think man is the 1st intelligent life from on earth and it's possible that man is much older the. What were are led to believe
Sometimes i see castle formations in coulds. Could our ancestors used to live in clouds? And if so, how did they built castles in it?
Mathew Reilly penned a similar Antarctic story. Great fantasy. History channel is stuffed. Content pffft.
That never happened but if it did its a sighn of mental health issues so maybe see a doctor
Hayo Miyazaki already did Castle in the Sky
😂😂
@@Farmer101 you are all forgetting the great Lovecraft's "At the mountains of madness"
William Shatner has a unique voice, like Leonard Nemoy, James Earl Jones, etc, that is brilliant for narration.
Back when people had talent not fake hype.
I'm sure there are incredible discoveries to be made, but this isn't one of them. It's clearly a mountain.
i agree
HAVE U BEEN THERE
This is a great example of how to apply Occam's Razor:
Theory A: This photo is of an ancient pyramid built by an unknown human civilization in Antarctica. This theory requires completely upending all known archaeology, anthropology and history. It requires explaining when and how humans could possibly have built such a thing when the Antarctic has been basically the same climate it is now for all of the human species existence.
Theory B: It's just a mountain that happens to look like a pyramid. Given all the many mountain forms tectonics and erosion can create a pointy one with four sides was one inevitable result.
Which theory is simpler? Which theory requires less leaps?
Same theory can explain the moon landings, either A it was all faked or B it was all real, what is simpler. Clearly it was simpler to go to the darn moon then fake the entire thing.
People mostly follow the crowd. Science, archaeology, geologist, history anthropology all change over time when what was not accepted become accepted to most then again follow the crowd. I for one follow the Bible.(nothing new under the sun. What is has already been.) Can you go to the Pole's any where you want? Or do you have to have permission? I agree that a lot of this is made up to sell. Not all is some information is in plain sight but the crowd say impossible, so it becomes impossible. Sometimes they are paid, threatened, or just fear being ruined so they say what is wanted not what they really think. Example the earth is round, The earth orbit's the sun. Today It is the crowd that agree with this not a long time ago you would have been ruined to say that. Yet ancient civilizations already knew this. Another example is flat earth today laughed at, what If they were talking about a parallel universe hence flat because parallel cannot be round. That is a lot of writing just to say the simplest theory is not always the correct one. A theory is just that a theory. A fact always has an exception always ,even if it is not known.
From that picture, that doesn't even look like a pyramid. Any close inspection would easily debunk this.
Ikr, they aren’t even objective at all, they should just inspect it first then with the facts propose an hypothesis
WHO IS ALLOWED PAST THE 60 PARALLEL
It is so obvious that this is just a mountain. I am open to the idea of there potentially being ruins under the ice of Antarctica. But this is clearly just a mountain. It just makes you look stupid and crazy trying to present the pictures of that mountain as evidence of a Pyramid.
@@retributionpics Exactly right. If we find archeological evidence of settlements or even mega structures beneath Antarctic ice, I would be amazed and very curious to know more about it. It would change the human history as we know it. But randomly picking a picture of a mountain and claiming it as a pyramid will only trivialize entire enthusiasm about Antarctica.
The great Pyramids in Egypt didnt even look like Pyramids after 3k years of being abandoned. The marble, Gold and limestone broke apart and it looked more like a pile of rubble. From 1300 to 1700 much of it was taken as it was more valuable material and the pyramids where reshaped around 1800 to look more like pyramids again. If not for modern interference it wouldnt look much different from the "pyramids" we see in Alaska or Antarctica that could very well just be sharp mountains or Megalifts with stuff piled on it. We have seen Megalifts structures that are well older then any civilization we have today like that.
hi from Mexico. That makes one think a lot about Antarctica and climate change.
I've seen this, some aliens were using it as a hunting ground for other aliens
I love being hispanic, no one questions who built our pyramids
really ? it's still a mystery who built Machu Picchu.
I've heard Black Americans saying your Pyramids were built by Blacks. But I don't believe that.
Mr Taco Bell
LMAO THATS COLD RICO
Its well known across the Marijuana community that the pyramids were build by the predators for there yearly population control hunts,we could sure use them now,these violent criminals and gangs could be offered up.for free,
It's crazy how far the history channel has fallen this beyond pathetic!
The earth is flat also! Just saying. Lol soon enough that will be the docs on the history channel. Lol
The History Channel used to be really awesome, now the lunatics run the asylum.
Bunch of crybabies in this thread...
So you don't believe in Ice Cores recovered from Antarctica? As far as the pyramids go, There might need to be a study done. Visiting the site could debunk it immediately. How do you believe science works? Should a hypothesis be rejected because it sounds crazy to you? If so everything you use in modern life should be thrown away.
who doesnt want to hear about hollow earth theory? lmao.
Feels like History channel sometimes don’t think twice, they immediately go with the most impossible answer, “our ancestors could have lived here, ET’s might live here!”, why not to do more research?! It just might be a really precise mountain formation that our mother nature made with cold winds and snow!!! Think twice people!!
When will you "investigate" who the man in the moon really is?
@@lazy5373 lactose intolerance got him!
Everyone knows it's Andy Kaufman
that was a hot one, it just made me bust out laughing! whaaaa haaa haaa
investigators has found that it was alice that got sent to the moon in the 70s, mystery solved
Obviously it's Jesus. I know that because the same face appeared on my best friends burnt toast many years ago, and while it's true he's a drinker, who sometimes exaggerates, I've never known him to lie outright.. in fact, his whole family verified it was a miracle. Explain THAT, unbelievers! 🤤
Just send someone there to check it out. It's totally improbable that people all of a sudden decided to build pyramids in an area that is mostly dark for part of the year. I'm willing to bet it's just a geologic formation that resembles pyramids. The fact that something resembles some other known object, doesn't mean it's also the same. If something is the shape of the Space Shuttle, it doesn't mean there were Space Shuttles 20,000 years ago.
Maybe because the shifts of the poles?
It isn't likely that anyone will go, one wrong move and you could be eaten by polar bears, trapped in a crevice, freeze to death, run out of food. Most likely there will be shows like this, but not enough interest to get someone to take a team out there to do anything.
@@vipervidsgamingplus5723 If the researchers thought their evidence of a pyramid was solid, they would have gotten funding for a team long ago. Pyramids discovered in the harshest place on Earth is the kind of find that defines careers. Researchers don't really think that was a pyramid (or at least they aren't confident enough to say it is), which is why nothing is happening after six years
@@vipervidsgamingplus5723 Wrong part of the world. Polar bears live in the North Pole. Penguins live in the South Pole. The other options are likely though - freezing or falling into a crevice. Food's not much of an issue as humans can survive for a while without that. Ignoring the cold and safety issues, you could live almost long enough to walk across all of Antarctica before starving to death theoretically. With the cold, you wouldn't make it nearly as far due to the extra calories required to keep up your internal heat.
The treaty keeps most research limited to a few specific locations
One summer season, in Mactown, on the Ice in the 90's, my surveyor friend was flown across the Ross Sea by Navy helos and was lowered down on to the top of this peak to mark it. It is called the Pyramid because it resembles a pyramid, even from across the sea-ice in McMurdo. It is not a pyramid, it is natural.
Yea, the channel’s talking about ice cores and imagining scenarios. It’s best to just head to the location (as your friend did), check it out and report back (as you did). So, thanks ;)
Gonna finish watching this and see how “high this pyramid goes”...
"One summer season, in Mactown, on the Ice in the 90's, my surveyor friend was flown across the Ross Sea by Navy helos and was lowered down on to the top of this peak to mark it."
And it would destroy the History Channel's pseudoscience narrative if they ever mentioned that.
Oh it's just a peak? Why have these channels tuned into fiction writers?
All the channels that get close to zero views do it.
Just like how mtv dosent play music.
Discovery is moon shiners and drag races.
Animal planet actually has hunting shows now.
And history channel covers aliens and big foot.
Next year we'll all be getting our computers fixed at the gym, and then go buy beer at the local library.
Yes there's also an old abandoned soviet mining town in Svalbard in the Arctic circle called Pyramiden, it's named after the mountain nearby because the mountain has a pyramid like shape. I honestly think these massive pyramid like structures in Antarctica are probably just mountains. It would be incredible to find a real pyramid in Antarctica but I think it would be highly unlikely.
How cool they got Johnny Cash to do the voiceover!
I’d love to see a doc on what happened to the history channel
So, you mean to tell me that, around 4000 BC, the same rough time period of the Bibical flood, where the landscape was hugely shifted and temperatures around the world changed, was when Antarctica experienced a drastic change in climate. Huh. So weird, I'm sure we'll never figure it out.
It wasn't a drastic shift. Antarctica used to be further north with a tropical climate. Tectonic drift took it south to where it is now. We're talking millions of years.
I am not surprised because Antarctica has not always been covered with ice. It used to be a tropical climate similar to the South pacific.
You should be surprised cause that was 450million years ago.
@@mrwakacorp bro there wasn’t even trees back then. More like 200 million years ago.
@@paintfatpurple7394 what makes me your bro is beyond me but let's say it's 200million. Still no humans for a good 197 million years.
@@mrwakacorp it was actually 90 million, but that’s only speculation, we’ve been wrong about almost everything until we discovered artifact, the new pyramids/remains they are finding in the Amazon from deforestation debunk the theory that we came to North America during the ice age over ice bridges, it’s now accepted that we were here before that but they don’t know how, and how did they share Egyptian beleifs when they existed 1000s of years apart separated by seas. The new evidence shows the Amazon became the jungle it is, because humans planted trees that took over the area long after they died.
Magnetic pole shift
From "history" to Stories Channel
"It has a PERFECTLY square base..." Perfectly square if your eyes are cross-eyed and you think not even close to perfect means PERFECTLY squared. It's amazing how when people have an agenda to prove a conclusion that they will see things that are obviously false as if they were true.
Confirmation bias
And they're not even wearing their reading glasses.
Any potential writing samples found? If they found that. It would certainly be more concrete.
@@ChrisF_1982 I think it's more of just another example of people wanting their pet idea to be real and are willing to accept anything to keep it.
@@ronneff5894 More like people who know they're lying and want to sell a book.
Obvously, the pyramyds of ant arctica were built by the ant cestors of the ants.
Don't make this more complicated than it is.
It's not ANT Arctica, it's AUNT Arctica!
@@thefurrybastard1964 bruh
Antarctic Ants?
😂🤣😝
🤣
Thats not a pyramid, thats a normal mountain...
Yes. Not a pyramid.
NEIN! This a secret military base built on the hight of the third Reich. It's located in a area wich is called Neuschwabenland. My grandfather was a snow plow driver back then, he told us all of it!
Clearly
But just buy into the psychosis. And you begin to realize you are nothing more than a blithering idiot. :)
@@haraldzimmermann3274 you meant your grossefarter! 👍
This video made me face palm so hard I look like I'm surviving an abusive relationship.
You're as blind as Ray Charles in the womb if you think the base of that mountain is even remotely close to square..
I'm fairly certain Hellen Keller suffering from stage 4 hypothermia could both draw a more perfect square than insinuated in this video and identify it visually.
OK as a Canadian, I feel obliged to say that I'm sorry.. This roast was triggered by this absolute mockery of actual history..
Hindsight is always 20/20. I look forward to using this mistake as an opportunity to be a better person. Looking back I now see this comment was made from an ignorant POV but no offence to blind people you can't really see my point
You leave Helen Keller out of this!
😂
For anybody who loves rabbit trails, look into Admiral Byrd's trip there and his claims of an opening to a hollow earth.
Rabbit holes?
Those journals are known fakes. Written by an author with absolutely no connection to Admiral Byrd.
Not a hollow earth he details a another land underneath the ice that is lush with life not intelligent life but trees and animals and vegetation
Yeah, that was a lie. This video is also a lie as this is a known mountain range that has been known about since the 1930s. The pyramidal mountain, which doesn't have a formal name, is one of the many peaks that make up Antarctica's Ellsworth Mountains, which were discovered by the American aviator Lincoln Ellsworth during a flight on Nov. 23, 1935, according to a 2007 research paper that was published by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).
More specifically, the unnamed mountain - located at 79°58’39.25"S 81°57’32.21"W - is in the southern part of the Ellsworth Mountains in an area called Heritage Range, which is known for its extraordinary fossils, including those of Cambrian-period trilobites from more than 500 million years ago, according to a 1972 USGS report.
The mountain isn't that tall by planetary standards - just 4,150 feet (1,265 meters) - or a little less than one-fifth the height of Denali, the tallest mountain in North America, according to Google Earth. The mountain may not have Denali's height, but its unique pyramidal shape sets it apart, said Mauri Pelto, a professor of environmental science at Nichols College in Dudley, Massachusetts.
Freeze-thaw erosion likely led to its pyramid-like shape, Pelto said. This happens when snow or water fills up cracks within a mountain during the day. When night falls and temperatures drop, the snow freezes and expands, turning into ice. The expanding ice causes the cracks to grow, Pelto said.
This freeze-thaw erosion happens countless times, leading to the creation of larger cracks that can, eventually, cause entire rock sections to break off, he said. These forces likely also shaped other pyramidal mountains, including the Matterhorn in the Alps, he said.
And the secret break away civilization by the Germans who fled there to their underground facilities and perfected their flying discs.
A perfect case of biased confirmation and it's a disgrace to even try to make this look like some sort of scientific investigation.
If you look really hard in the lower left corner, you can see Bigfoot building the foundation! LOL!
Wow, what a reach. As a certified armchair scientist, I can tell just by the shadow alone it's an organic, natural mountain formation. They actually built a whole show around this with William Shatner narrating and everything? lol
Everything that is perceived real is fake. Everything that is perceived fake is real.
Yeah, absolute BS. They make stories out of nonsense.
I know ! Shatter must really be hurting for work to sink this low ! I guess he can't even get commercials anymore !
That's warp-factor showbiz.
yeah dont know what theyre smoking
The plant core sample is amazing, the climate must have been different on Antarctica before
Yes, the flood of Noah changed many things including the oxygen levels in the atmosphere. They find trees under the ice, more proof the Earth’s atmosphere was vastly different not too long ago contrary to the unprovable equations used to justify evolution!
Yes....roughly 90 million years ago.
@@stiimuli prove it without unprovable math?!?!
@@stiimuli actually no, alot less than that. Theres is maps of Antarctica before ice. Check out Graham Hancok interview with Joe Rogan. Really interesting stuff
Yeah it use to be tropical millions of years ago.
One of the oldest maps shows Antarctica without ice, with trees and animals.
Ancient maps are well known for their accuracy. Check out the Mountains of Kong.
I watched a documentary on the Anti-Diluvian Period here on UA-cam. It makes a compelling case for that very thing as well as many other theories. The archeologist that was making the presentation tried to be neutral on whether it was evidence for Creation or evolution.
Pfft, when you guys discover the earth is hollow you'll forget about silly pyramids in antarctica.
@@SmithyyGCN evolution is quite obviously an established scientific fact whether Antarctica was recently ice-less or not. These people who try to pretend they are neutral are really just creationists trying to create doubt. This is what they do since they can never prove anything.
@@sigmundferd1359 the ice in Antarctica is two miles thick in places , it would have to snow mighty frickin hard for that to build up within the span of written history ! 1 foot of snow when compacted equals about an inch of ice and there are 63360 inches in a mile . That would be roughly 126, 720 feet of snow ! Doesn't seem very likely now does it ! That's roughly 633 feet of snow a year if and only if zero snow melted .
The people who say it's just a mountain confuse me. Look at all of the other mountains, 100% random and unpredictable in shape and form. Even height, but a perfectly square mountain? Two perfectly square mountains? It's wildly unlikely especially considering the structure of the other mountains in the region which just don't have that kind of consistent shape and definitely leans towards a man made object structure. It's sort of relating to the argument for Creationism, there is so much evidence towards intelligent design that it is more likely than not that there was A creator, or that we were at some point created. True atheism is so unbelievably rare because it's a leap of faith in a place and time which just doesn't really support it anymore, especially when we have the Webb telescope and everything it's uncovered about the origin of our universe.
1. Those "pyramids" are clearly rocky mountainous formations -- a single structure, rather than blocks of stone, as the true pyramids in Egypt and the Americas are. So, unless ancient humans carved pyramids out of a single mountain -- a superhuman feat way beyond today's technology -- looks like they're just works of nature.
2. Antartica WAS a much milder, rainforest climate once. But that was tens of millions of years ago, when human ancestors were shrew-like creatures scuttling under the feet of the great dinosaurs. Since the time of man, the continent has been a block of ice.
I do love a great folk tale, though.
The pyramidal mountain, which doesn't have a formal name, is one of the many peaks that make up Antarctica's Ellsworth Mountains, which were discovered by the American aviator Lincoln Ellsworth during a flight on Nov. 23, 1935, according to a 2007 research paper that was published by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).
More specifically, the unnamed mountain - located at 79°58’39.25"S 81°57’32.21"W - is in the southern part of the Ellsworth Mountains in an area called Heritage Range, which is known for its extraordinary fossils, including those of Cambrian-period trilobites from more than 500 million years ago, according to a 1972 USGS report.
The mountain isn't that tall by planetary standards - just 4,150 feet (1,265 meters) - or a little less than one-fifth the height of Denali, the tallest mountain in North America, according to Google Earth. The mountain may not have Denali's height, but its unique pyramidal shape sets it apart, said Mauri Pelto, a professor of environmental science at Nichols College in Dudley, Massachusetts.
Freeze-thaw erosion likely led to its pyramid-like shape, Pelto said. This happens when snow or water fills up cracks within a mountain during the day. When night falls and temperatures drop, the snow freezes and expands, turning into ice. The expanding ice causes the cracks to grow, Pelto said.
This freeze-thaw erosion happens countless times, leading to the creation of larger cracks that can, eventually, cause entire rock sections to break off, he said. These forces likely also shaped other pyramidal mountains, including the Matterhorn in the Alps, he said.
@@Coinz8 Ha. Just saw your post below. I didn't know those specifics, but could sure tell they were mountains anyway lol. Thanks!
@A Parker Yeah, and humans werent around 10 million years ago but these MOUNTAINS might have been.
Its possible to carve a mountain into a pyramid with today's technology
Yeah, it was much warmer roughly 32 Million years ago. You're right on the ball there!
If this proves true in the near future, then yes, this will indeed be relevant for the HISTORY channel. You can mock the pyramid theory, but core samples with the plant specimens is hard science.
"Follow the Science" unless you don't like it. Then call it ridiculous.
Why doesn't the clip show the age of those core samples with plants? Likely because it is from millions of years not thousands. The video implies this was recent but the scientist doesn't.
@@jordonbeem1184 the implications of humans in antartica millions of years ago is earth shattering to say the least. The ice will continue to melt. And we're going to rewrite history. Prepare yourselves accordingly.
@@jordonbeem1184 ...EXACTLY!...typical history channel distorted rubbish 🗑. This is the kind of thing you don't find on BBC programs.
@@jordonbeem1184 or it’s a mountain….
‘It has a perfectly square base. Here let me show you’
Proceeds to draw a perfect square in the snow 😅
right, the image isn't directly above the pyramid, unless its top isn't centred.
- Some random mountain in Antartica: "I'm not square, I'm not triangular, you can't really see me because I'm covered in ice. I'm not a pyramid."
- History channel: "You are a pyramid."
The mind sees what it wants to see.
The pyramid is clearly a mountain.
@@club4ghz And you have what to back that up, or is it simply your 'opinion'?
Well a free mind sees the truth .
@@musicluvr70 Search more pictures. Those from the top with the bigger zoom out shows clearly it's part of a larger mountain structure. Here on youtube they cherry picked images to fool everyone.
@Joshua Preston And the channel funds with what the mind sees
History: "There's all these crazy pyramids all over the place."
Me: "Those are mountains."
History: "Ohhhh... Good thing we're not the Geography channel."
I wouldn't doubt it. I have long believed that antarctic was once in the tropic zone and was a flourishing capital that stretched its empire to all other continents of the world. I thinknit may have been the ancient civilization of Atlantis and had pyramids just as Egypt does and as other countries do. A meteor hit it and created a huge crater that was so magnetized it pulled the whole crust around the mantle towards the south pole. Which made it freeze suddenly and brought the already frozen ice into the tropics which melted and cause the great flood. That would explain alot about why we find artifacts and stories from around the world about the civilization and ive heard recent reports that they may have found the place of impact. All of this is theory but I think more and more information point this. Well never know until we find absolute proof though so I have my fingers crossed 🤞. Imagine what we could discover
Or (if you are a believer) the water canopy before the flood produced a greenhouse effect on the planet evenly distributing the heat, and after the flood deserts started forming and Antarctica iced up due to the angle of the earth and exposure to sunlight without the water canopy.
@@CallipygianMoose ?.
@@valerieshipston I meant if you believe in the bible account of the flood. Genesis 1:6,7 talks about 2 bodies of water being divided by 'heaven' or sky. Meaning there was once a water canopy surrounding earth. The flood waters would have come from that canopy.
Just check the Adam & Eve Story bynDr Chan Thomas. It was sanituzed by the CIA
You lost me at tropical zone
When I was a kid, the History Channel showed actual history. It was amazing, factual, and fun to learn from.
They lowered the academic standards to get people. Why we have bad teachers and programs. History Channel is pure speculation. Like Ancient Aliens.
Ya but you’re a goofy .. don’t like it keep it moving
history is subjective and written by the winners
@@bonbon5418 scientist agree on that but also that these fantasy things have no evidence at all😂
Yea bro tell me how a perfectly cut mountain like that appeared
It's possible that humans could build a pyramid over there. In 1513 year Piri Reis made a Map of the World with Antarctic without Ice, there are rivers, lakes and exact shape of shoreline as we know now.
That map is based on older source maps
It dosent get older then that😂😂😂 the map he is refering too@aliveonmoonrocks
Love Shatner's commentary - he delivers it all like he knows the story is complete bollocks.
He is being paid as a narrator to do exactly that. Narrators are just actors or actresses delivering their lines, you just can not see them.
To use the correct English, it’s utter bollocks.
Yep, Shatner is a pro.
+B mcGOO
Right, and we know the captain of a star ship is an expert. :D
I don't care f it's bollocks, I could listen to Shatner narrate the drying of paint.
The real brilliant part about these pyramids is how the builders constructed them to be indistinguishable from natural mountain formations. We can't even do that today. They must have used lasers!
Lmao what pyramids those are mountain ranges and very easily distinguishable from man made objects
@@fbi805 dude…they were obv being sarcastic
@@greylark2759 he was*
@@visual7150 I’m not gonna assume
@@greylark2759 also even if it wasnt who cares
Perfectly square face? More like a perfectly unsquare mountain
Will's a great narrator, makes the show seem that much more fascinating.
Khannnnn!!!!!!!!
Spock would have been good also. Like the one show from the 70's he did.
@@moparone7962 he dead
I know, 2015 I think
@@tunadog1945 Precisely!
Before watching: This ought to be good.. "History" channel has such a great reputation for documenting facts.
After watching: Not disappointed. Promised utter conjecture based on flimsy evidence and delivered just that. 10/10.
An entire episode based on a clearly mistaken observation of a “perfectly” shaped mountain, explained by authors of science fiction books. And all this on the ‘HISTORY’ channel.
Rating is everything.
Yes, I can see it's a mountain myself!
At the mountains of madness..
I can't believe this guys argument is, "Why would they believe this if it wasn't true" 🤣
Why wouldn't you believe him if it was true?
@@Flexyourmemes Why are you being like this 😂.. My point is that his "scientific" argument is that a people would only believe something if it was true. But in societies there are myths propaganda etc. that people believe in that are not true. Therefore just because people believe something it does not mean that its true. The people could have been lied to and they continued believing it.. He should base his conclusions on finding artifacts that prove the belief rather than asserting that people can only believe something if it is true. I hope this clarifies my point 😇
@@Theomatikalli read it again dude...
They need to go out to the site and directly confirm that they are man made pyramids.
They wont because they know for a fact that it isnt because these mountains were discovered in 1930s The pyramidal mountain, which doesn't have a formal name, is one of the many peaks that make up Antarctica's Ellsworth Mountains, which were discovered by the American aviator Lincoln Ellsworth during a flight on Nov. 23, 1935, according to a 2007 research paper that was published by the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).
More specifically, the unnamed mountain - located at 79°58’39.25"S 81°57’32.21"W - is in the southern part of the Ellsworth Mountains in an area called Heritage Range, which is known for its extraordinary fossils, including those of Cambrian-period trilobites from more than 500 million years ago, according to a 1972 USGS report.
The mountain isn't that tall by planetary standards - just 4,150 feet (1,265 meters) - or a little less than one-fifth the height of Denali, the tallest mountain in North America, according to Google Earth. The mountain may not have Denali's height, but its unique pyramidal shape sets it apart, said Mauri Pelto, a professor of environmental science at Nichols College in Dudley, Massachusetts.
Freeze-thaw erosion likely led to its pyramid-like shape, Pelto said. This happens when snow or water fills up cracks within a mountain during the day. When night falls and temperatures drop, the snow freezes and expands, turning into ice. The expanding ice causes the cracks to grow, Pelto said.
This freeze-thaw erosion happens countless times, leading to the creation of larger cracks that can, eventually, cause entire rock sections to break off, he said. These forces likely also shaped other pyramidal mountains, including the Matterhorn in the Alps, he said.
MAN MADE LOL YOU HAVE NO CLUE
Cant be man made
@@tamingguppies my point is they already have scientists there in Antarctica for the very purpose of studying everything there. So if there were any evidence of man made pyramids they can just go over to where they are and confirm it instead of making full blown conclusions based on satellite photos. As far as I am concerned just go there and see weather it is or is not man made. Going to the site directly is the only way to know for sure.
@@Coinz8 Based on what you say here assuming it is absolutely true then that means the content of this video is knowingly pushing a lie. Wouldn't be the first time I heard of people lying for a sensational story.
I'm surprised they didn't mention the ancient map of the area that was proven accurate.
Which one?
@@kaanjel Piri Reis
@@julianj9830 ah, thnx
@Butterb0ne was it proven accurate, tho?
@@kaanjel Some of the nutcases swear it was proven right. One guy traced the map and layered it over a map of the globe from today. Lot's of inaccuracies and he suggested that the continent that supposed to be "Antarctica" was more likely South America.
Perfectly squared 🧐. I must be needing glasses or my eye site is distorted 😂
BS alert.
You believe in Santa
The Easter Bunny
Jesus Christmas
@@richardmaclean7581 You don't believe in nature.
@@richardmaclean7581 Im pretty sure, like most adults, DONT.
The Piri Reis map alone is proof that Antarctica hasn't been covered with ice for as long as we're led to believe.
no.. have you actually seen that map? it's backwards. is missing major. ountain ranges that do exist irl. has formations on the map that dont exist irl. and is the completely wrong size.
@@FreebirthBoccara One error doesn't make another anymore than one true thing makes another. Any map could have some right parts and some wrong parts and most did.
Feel free to trust a map made in 1513. 🤣🤣🤣
This is misinformation 😢
You know, when researchers lack funding, they typically start making stuff up to get more funding. Also people have a tendency to want to see patterns where none exist. This is both of those cases
so do tv channels
You look like creepier version of an already creepy Elon musk. Go home.
I agree!
True. Remember the "Face" on Mars?
@@speckgens according to history channel, the faces on mars is a structure for when the free mason lived on mars before it lost it's atmosphere and they moved to earth
I love how they pretend to not know the true history that they have completely hidden from us
They think they are ancient aliens.
What person do you actually think is that clever to hide all this stuff from you? You're dreaming.
@@majorpwner241 it's not about the cleverness of any given individual. Clearly you don't know how information works and how compartmentalized access to it allows for complex processes to be carried out by people who couldn't complete the entire project individually. History and your access to truth has been compartmentalized and you have been given an acceptable version of the truth that facilitates modern life. You probably think all conspiracy theories are stupid because nobody would "keep it a secret" right? It would eventually get out? Yet you ignore the reality that institutions like governments learned a long time ago how to manipulate and direct access to information. You've got no access to classified data in this system and you don't see classified data being exposed all the time. You're dreaming if you think the version of history you have accepted is actually true.
@@danmoore6062 No, I think things like the JFK assassination were very clearly perpetrated by the government, and you'd have to be as big a mook to believe that official story as you'd have to be to believe some illuminati or some NWO is actually controlling the world and all information therein. There's things people simply don't know because it was lost to history or never known to begin with, but everything has to be some wild conspiracy against you. Why?
@@majorpwner241 Why are you continually projecting this notion that I believe it is against me personally? You're clearly just trying to lazily attach this label to me so you can feel satisfied with your opinion of me. You're not listening. Just because some things might be lost to history doesn't exclude the possibility that the people in power have created a beneficial control of the history that we do currently have access to right? You seem to think you can propose certain things that you believe rule out what I'm saying. Even if entire civilizations were lost to history that we have never learned about, that doesn't mean that the history we do have access to hasn't been intentionally manipulated. I don't believe the world is run by 9 men in robes in a dark room laughing maniacally about subjugating the whole world. I do believe we have been led into an intentional gilded cage in which the information we engage with and the power structures we exist under are controlled by a hierarchy we don't have access to. I don't believe the President of the United States runs the United States. The roots run deeper and I have research and legitimate reasons for thinking this. If you want to just call me a delusional paranoid and then go about your day thinking you're smarter than me or whatever then be my guest. I'm only pointing out how the system plays defense for itself through entertainment and control over the relationship minds develop with information they are exposed to. I am thinking on a layer you aren't even considering.
it's a pity that so far and deep under the ice ... I won't film these pyramids 😉✌
good joke🤣