Congrats! That is super impressive!!! Impressive, that is, if Stanford and Penn Law Reviews' do not consider race, reserve a certain number of spots for URMs, or use backdoor ways of considering race (e.g., my school's law review claimed not to consider race but they would allow personal statements, make explicitly clear it was okay for applicants to reveal their race in such statements, and then the executive boards would make explicitly clear that they personally consider race in making admission decisions, so race really was a decision making criteria despite formally not being one). Unfortunately, until such systems are remove from schools, and affirmative action admissions are truly eliminated (no one believes these law schools are going to give up easy, facially neutral but racially discriminatory admissions criteria are already in the works), your accomplishments are always tainted with the doubt that you did not really earn them. No one on Earth has it easier than a black woman in an American law school.
Who’s tainting my accomplishments, you? I ask because it’s surely not me, nor jobs, nor judges, etc etc. Respectfully, Brandon, your frustrations are irrelevant. I am sorry you did not make your law review. I hope you continue engaging with diverse perspectives!
finally stanford content!! congratsss sis, super proud of you and your achievements!!
yesss we’re here! thank you!
I wish you made a video about the transfer process & 1L grades etc
6:15 Barbieeeee
What a bop
please keep us updated on how you like NorCal and Stanford!! I’ve been watching your videos on my lsat study breaks. Thanks for all the motivation
of course!! good luck on the LSAT!
Girl... you're on it!!!! I haven't even watched the video yet, but so happy for you omg.
lol thank you!!!
A whole legend out here! Congratulations 🎉
thank you 🥹
I like your content because I feel like there is content that I can grasp onto and remember
aw yay! :)
Congrats! That is super impressive!!! Impressive, that is, if Stanford and Penn Law Reviews' do not consider race, reserve a certain number of spots for URMs, or use backdoor ways of considering race (e.g., my school's law review claimed not to consider race but they would allow personal statements, make explicitly clear it was okay for applicants to reveal their race in such statements, and then the executive boards would make explicitly clear that they personally consider race in making admission decisions, so race really was a decision making criteria despite formally not being one). Unfortunately, until such systems are remove from schools, and affirmative action admissions are truly eliminated (no one believes these law schools are going to give up easy, facially neutral but racially discriminatory admissions criteria are already in the works), your accomplishments are always tainted with the doubt that you did not really earn them. No one on Earth has it easier than a black woman in an American law school.
Who’s tainting my accomplishments, you? I ask because it’s surely not me, nor jobs, nor judges, etc etc. Respectfully, Brandon, your frustrations are irrelevant. I am sorry you did not make your law review. I hope you continue engaging with diverse perspectives!
Yesssss♥️♥️♥️
💗☺️
CONGRATS!!!
thank you!!!
6:18 ok miss vibratoooooo!!! But congrats on law review!
haha thank you!!
The Red book is followed throughout California Law Schools. The Law School I attended used both the Red Book as well as the Blue Book.
Interesting!! Good to know!
LETS GO!!!!! CONGRATULATIONS!!!!
thank you!!!
Congratulations!! 🎉
thank you!!
You're such an inspiration 🥰Congratulations!!🎉
thank you!!💗💗
Congratulations! You should be very proud! Also you have a nice singing voice!
haha thank you!!
That's fireee
ikr!!
Can you teach me how to get into law school?
this channel is basically a crash course!